DOCSLIB.ORG

SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE in the MEKONG DELTA Applying a Political Economy Lens to the Farmer Loophole with a Focus on Vietnam and Laos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE in the MEKONG DELTA Applying a Political Economy Lens to the Farmer Loophole with a Focus on Vietnam and Laos TURTLE FARM NEAR HAI PHONG CITY, VIETNAM SOURCE: AUSTRALIAN DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE IN THE MEKONG DELTA Applying a Political Economy Lens to the Farmer Loophole with a Focus on Vietnam and Laos DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by a team from DevLab@Duke, including Edmund Malesky, Songkhun Nillasithanukroh, Ekta Patel, and Erika Weinthal, under the Research Technical Assistance Center. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) or the U.S. Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................. IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2. THE RELEVANCE OF TURTLES IN WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN VIETNAM .... 6 2.1 WHY TURTLES? ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 TURTLE SPECIES ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3. FARMER LOOPHOLE ...................................................................................................... 10 3.1 THE FARMER LOOPHOLE AND ITS CONTEXT IN MEKONG REGION .......................... 10 3.2 CRITICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY ISSUES IN FARMER LOOPHOLE .................................. 13 3.2.1 LOCAL-CENTRAL RELATIONS ............................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 COMMERCIAL WILDLIFE FARMING REGULATIONS IN VIETNAM AND LAOS . 17 3.2.3 CORRUPTION ............................................................................................................................ 21 3.2.4 INFORMATIONAL GAPS ......................................................................................................... 21 3.2.5 POVERTY ...................................................................................................................................... 24 4. INTERVENTIONS AND EXPERIMENTS ..................................................................... 25 4.1 BEHAVIORAL CHANGE TO REDUCE DEMAND OF END-USERS ...................................... 28 4.1.1 THEORY OF CHANGE ............................................................................................................ 30 4.1.2 OUTCOME AND IMPACT VARIABLE ................................................................................. 30 4.1.3 INTERVENTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.4 LOGIC MODEL ........................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 ENFORCEMENT THROUGH BETTER TRAINING AND TECHNOLOGY ......................... 33 4.2.1 THEORY OF CHANGE ............................................................................................................ 35 4.2.2 OUTCOME AND IMPACT VARIABLE ................................................................................. 35 4.2.3 INTERVENTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.4 LOGIC MODEL ........................................................................................................................... 37 4.3 SUSTAINABLE FARMING TO INCREASE INCOMES OF WILDLIFE FARMERS ................. 38 4.3.1 THEORY OF CHANGE ............................................................................................................ 40 4.3.2 OUTCOME AND IMPACT VARIABLE ................................................................................. 40 4.3.3 INTERVENTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 40 4.3.4 LOGIC MODEL ........................................................................................................................... 41 5. CONCLUSION: POTENTIAL FOR IMPACT ............................................................. 42 APPENDIX 1: TURTLE SPECIES ........................................................................................ 44 APPENDIX I1: LIST OF RESPONDENTS......................................................................... 49 APPENDIX I1I: RELEVANT LAWS .................................................................................... 52 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 55 USAID.GOV SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE | II LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Critical representations of turtles in Vietnamese culture ...................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Vietnam’s Institutional Framework for Wildlife Protection ................................................................. 16 Figure 3: Turtle supply chain and intervention targets ........................................................................................... 26 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Laws relevant to the wildlife trade .............................................................................................................. 10 Table 2: List of permits required of commercial wildlife farms in Vietnam ..................................................... 18 Table 3: Modified replication of a table from a TRAFFIC report on some turtle species protected by law in Vietnam (ENV, 2018; McCormack and Thuy, 2013) ......................................................... 18 Table 4: Past and Current Intervention Efforts in the Mekong Region .............................................................. 27 Table 5: Behavioral Change Logic Model .................................................................................................................. 32 Table 6: Enforcement Logic Model ............................................................................................................................ 38 Table 7: Sustainable Development Logic Model for Turtle Farming .................................................................. 42 USAID.GOV SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE | III ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ARI – Aquatic Research Institute (Vietnam) ATP – Asian Turtle Program CITES – Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CRES – Centre for Resources, and Environment Studies (Vietnam) DARD – Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (Vietnam) DOF – Department of Fisheries (Cambodia) DOIT - Department of Industry and Trade (Vietnam) DONRE – Department of Natural Resources and Environment (Vietnam) DoP – Department of Police (Vietnam) DPI - Department of Planning and Investment (Vietnam) ENV – Education for Nature – Vietnam FAO – United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization FPD – Forest Protection Department (Vietnam) LURC - Land use certificate IEBR – Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources (Vietnam) INGO – International Non-Governmental Organization IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature MAF – Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Laos) MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (Cambodia) MARD – Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development (Vietnam) MONRE – Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (Vietnam) MPS – Ministry of Public Security (Vietnam) M&E – Monitoring and Evaluation NAPA – Vietnamese National Academy of Public Administration NGO – Non-Governmental Organization PanNature – People and Nature Reconciliation PCC – People’s Committee Chairman (Vietnam) PEER – Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research PFPD – Provincial Forest Protection Department (Vietnam) RCT – Randomized Control Trial USAID – United States Agency for International Development VCCI – Vietnamese Chamber of Commerce and Industry VCP – Vietnamese Communist Party WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society WWF – World Wide Fund for Nature USAID.GOV SCALING BACK WILDLIFE TRADE | IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Greater Mekong region across Southeast Asia is host to a wealth of biodiversity that has historically played an important role in local daily life and traditional culture. People from this region have raised animals as pets as well as hunted them for use in medicines, delicacies, and ornaments. In recent years, however, growing economic prosperity in the region has increased the demand for wildlife products. This rise in demand has led to illegal animal trafficking, which greatly threatens the survival of many endangered species in the region. Chief among the animals facing an increased risk of extinction are turtles. Their rapid decline in the region has led conservationists to call this situation the “Asian Turtle Crisis.” Rising demand for turtle products in jewelry and traditional medicine across China, the largest consumer of turtles in the world, accounts for the exploitative turtle trade. With the Chinese economy’s growth and the expansion of the middle class, this turtle consumption has become increasingly unsustainable. Nations in the Mekong region play a significant role as suppliers to China due to their geographical proximity and rich turtle fauna. However, the demand for turtles and the proliferation of the local trade in the Mekong region also comes from Vietnam’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Programme of the Visit Tours Is Available for Download (Pdf)
    STUDY TOURS HANOI INTA 37 VIETNAM Date: 2 December 2013. Time: 13.00 to 17.00 Start Pullman Hanoi Hotel National Urban Planning Exhibition Palace Group 1: Group 2: NEW NEIGHBORHOODS HERITAGE HANOI Destination 1: Destination 1: Ciputra Hanoi International City Hoan Kiem Lake Destination 2: Destination 2: Lac Long Quan flower garden The Old Quarter Destination 3: Destination 3: Tay Ho Temple Hanoi Opera House Destination 4: Destination 4: Tran Quoc Pagoda Ngoc Son temple Back to Pullman Hanoi Hotel INTRODUCTION ON TOUR LOCATION NATIONAL URBAN PLANNING EXHIBITION PALACE (NUPEL) The National Planning Hall The building is located about 10km from the city centre, in one of the most recent development area of Hanoi. This building is surrounded by several contemporary architecture buildings such as the Vietnam national convention centre, Hanoi Museum and Marriott Hotel, creating a beautiful urban landscape. The National Urban Planning Exhibition Palace was established by the Minister of Construction, functioning as a place for organizing exhibitions, events and activities involving introducing key National and Hanoi construction plans. This also a great place for information in architecture, construction, planning, technical infrastructure and urban development fields. The National Urban Planning Exhibition Palace, where are displayed models, information and drawings of Hanoi City planning up to the year 2050, provides more understanding of Hanoi city, its urban growth and future planning. This building will be the start place of both study tours: Hanoi Heritage and New Neighborhoods tours. Study tours – INTA37 – Hanoi – 2/12/2013 2 NEW NEIGHBORHOODS: CIPUTRA HANOI INTERNATIONAL CITY AND ITS WEST LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD West Lake, a freshwater-lake in the centre of Hanoi, this is the largest lake of the city with a shore length of 17 km.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turtle Free
    FREE THE TURTLE PDF Cynthia Rylant,Preston McDaniels | 48 pages | 01 Apr 2006 | Beach Lane Books | 9780689863127 | English | New York, NY, United Kingdom Turtle (submersible) - Wikipedia They scored their biggest and best-known hit in with the song " Happy Together " [2]. The band broke up in Adhering to the prevailing musical trend, they rebranded themselves as a folk rock group under the name The Tyrtlesan intentionally stylized misspelling inspired by The The Turtle and The Beatles. However, the trendy spelling did not survive long. As with the Byrds, the Turtles achieved breakthrough success with a cover of a Bob The Turtle song. One single, the tough "Outside Chance", written by Warren Zevon and featuring guitar work in the The Turtle of The Beatles' " Taxman ", did not chart. At the start ofdrummer Don Murray and bassist Chuck Portz quit the group. The first of several key Turtles singles co-written by Garry Bonner and Alan Gordon" Happy Together " had already been rejected by countless performers. The Turtles' only No. An album of the same name followed and peaked at No. Impressed by Chip Douglas's studio arrangements, Michael Nesmith approached him after a Turtles show at the Whisky a Go Go and invited him to become The Monkees ' new producer, as that band wanted to break out of their "manufactured" studio mold. Douglas was replaced by Jim Pons on bass. Nineteen sixty-seven proved to be the Turtles' most successful year on the music charts. Both 45s signaled a certain shift in the band's style. Golden Hits was released later The Turtle year, charting in the top The similar album covers for The Turtle Turtles! Inrhythm guitarist Jim Tucker left the band citing the pressure of touring and recording new material.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in the Historical Centre of Hanoi, Vietnam
    remote sensing Article TerraSAR-X Data for High-Precision Land Subsidence Monitoring: A Case Study in the Historical Centre of Hanoi, Vietnam Tuan S. Le 1, Chung-Pai Chang 1,2,*, Xuan T. Nguyen 1 and Akano Yhokha 2 1 Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan; [email protected] (T.S.L.); [email protected] (X.T.N.) 2 Institute of Geophysics, National Central University, Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-3-422-7151 (ext. 57627); Fax: +886-3-425-4908 Academic Editors: Zhong Lu and Prasad S. Thenkabail Received: 21 February 2016; Accepted: 12 April 2016; Published: 19 April 2016 Abstract: In this study, subsidence patterns in the Historical Centre of Hanoi, Vietnam are mapped using the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technique, with particular emphasis on the stability of ancient monuments, historical buildings and archaeological sectors. Due to the small and scattered characteristics of these structures, not only is a comprehensive coverage of radar targets needed, but also the details of a single building or monument. We took advantage of the high-resolution TerraSAR-X imagery with the aid of oversampling implementation on the Small Baseline (SB) InSAR approach to reveal the subsidence patterns. A total of 6.29 million radar targets were obtained, maintaining the average density of 217,012 points/km2. Our results suggest that image oversampling not only increased the number of measurement points 4.4 times more than the standard processing chain, but also removed some of the noisiest points.
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the Turtle Survival Alliance 55 Visit Us Online At
    TurtleA PUBLICATION OF THE Survival TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE 2015 TSA EUROPE Captive Breeding Critical to Saving the Highly Endangered Vietnamese Pond Turtle (Mauremys annamensis) Henk Zwartepoorte, Herbert Becker, Elmar Meier, Martina Raffel & Tim McCormack The Vietnamese Pond Turtle is not a particularly attractive or colorful species, so they were not very popular with private owners and zoos. Be- lieved extinct as recently as 2006, their fortunate survival now depends on captive breeding efforts to increase their numbers in the wild. Serious scientiic inquiry was initiated after it was discovered that individual specimens of M. annamensis were occasionally offered for sale in Asian animal markets. Field research and local interviews revealed that the species was not ex- tinct, and eventually discovered the origin of the market turtles. A wild, residential population was discovered in Central Vietnam within a distant and isolated area of the Quang Nam Province. Shortly afterwards, Vietnamese authorities began conservation efforts to protect the species with enthusiastic support from leading European zoos. A plan was developed whereby Vietnamese Pond Turtles hatched in Europe would be made available for a reintroduction project in Vietnam. The project’s plan requires inding out how many A juvenile M. annamensis in the wild – still a rarity. animals are left in the wild, where they live, and how these areas can be protected. The plan Association for Zoos and Aquariums (EAZA) The implementation of the EAZA studbook also includes the important goal of gaining local discussed how the breeding of the Vietnamese took longer than expected, so there was over- community support for reintroduction of M.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File Containing Table of Lengths and Thicknesses of Turtle Shells And
    Source Species Common name length (cm) thickness (cm) L t TURTLES AMNH 1 Sternotherus odoratus common musk turtle 2.30 0.089 AMNH 2 Clemmys muhlenbergi bug turtle 3.80 0.069 AMNH 3 Chersina angulata Angulate tortoise 3.90 0.050 AMNH 4 Testudo carbonera 6.97 0.130 AMNH 5 Sternotherus oderatus 6.99 0.160 AMNH 6 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 7 Sternotherus oderatus 7.00 0.165 AMNH 8 Homopus areolatus Common padloper 7.95 0.100 AMNH 9 Homopus signatus Speckled tortoise 7.98 0.231 AMNH 10 Kinosternon subrabum steinochneri Florida mud turtle 8.90 0.178 AMNH 11 Sternotherus oderatus Common musk turtle 8.98 0.290 AMNH 12 Chelydra serpentina Snapping turtle 8.98 0.076 AMNH 13 Sternotherus oderatus 9.00 0.168 AMNH 14 Hardella thurgi Crowned River Turtle 9.04 0.263 AMNH 15 Clemmys muhlenbergii Bog turtle 9.09 0.231 AMNH 16 Kinosternon subrubrum The Eastern Mud Turtle 9.10 0.253 AMNH 17 Kinixys crosa hinged-back tortoise 9.34 0.160 AMNH 18 Peamobates oculifers 10.17 0.140 AMNH 19 Peammobates oculifera 10.27 0.140 AMNH 20 Kinixys spekii Speke's hinged tortoise 10.30 0.201 AMNH 21 Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle 10.30 0.406 AMNH 22 Terrapene ornata North American box turtle 10.76 0.257 AMNH 23 Geochelone radiata radiated tortoise (Madagascar) 10.80 0.155 AMNH 24 Malaclemys terrapin diamondback terrapin 11.40 0.295 AMNH 25 Malaclemys terrapin Diamondback terrapin 11.58 0.264 AMNH 26 Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle 11.80 0.259 AMNH 27 Chrysemys picta Painted turtle 12.21 0.267 AMNH 28 Chrysemys picta painted turtle 12.70 0.168 AMNH 29
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Director Report
    CEPF/DC16/5 Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Sixteenth Meeting of the Donor Council Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia 15 January 2010 8 a.m. – 11 a.m. EST Executive Director Report For Information Only: The Acting Executive Director will highlight key developments since the Fifteenth Meeting of the Donor Council on 9 September 2009. For information, a report highlighting the following activities since that date is attached: Partnership Highlights Featured New Grants Highlights from the Field Approved Grants (15 August 2009 – 1 December 2009) A financial summary is also included. 1 Program Overview Hotspot strategies implemented: 18 Countries and territories covered within those hotspots: 51 Partners supported: 1,500+ Committed grants: $116 million Amount leveraged by those grants: $222 million Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Summary Fund Statement As of September 30, 2009 Revenue Cumulative Grants and Contributions $210,386,650 Gain (Loss) on Foreign Exchange 1,888,006 Interest Earned 1,956,822 Total Revenue 214,231,479 Expenses Grants 116,111,639 Ecosystem Profile Preparation 7,576,812 External Evaluation and Compliance Audit 344,653 Operations 20,005,668 Total Expenses 144,038,772 $70,192,707 FUND BALANCE AT THE END OF THE PERIOD CONSISTING OF: Cash Net of Amount Due to/from CI $33,654,669 Accounts Receivable 51,873,558 Grants Payable (15,335,521) Fund balance at end of the period $70,192,707 2 Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Summary Fund Statement As of September 30, 2009 Cumulative Revenue
    [Show full text]
  • OM 4.5.4 (Rev) CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
    OM 4.5.4 (Rev) CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: Cleveland Zoological Society Research and Conservation Action for Tortoises and Project Title: Freshwater Turtles in Indo-Burma Date of Report: 15th July 2013 Timothy McCormack – Program Coordinator Asian Turtle Program (ATP) of Cleveland Zoological Society Report Author and Contact [email protected] Information PO Box 179, Hanoi Central Post Office, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84 (0) 4 3514 9750 CEPF Region: Indo-Burma Strategic Direction: 1. Safeguard priority globally threatened species in Indochina by mitigating major threats Grant Amount: US$154,950 Project Dates: 1 October, 2009 to 31 March, 2013 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): The Asian Turtle Program (ATP) of Cleveland Zoological Society (CZS) has worked closely with a number of NGO and governmental partners to ensure the successful implementation of this project in Vietnam and Cambodia. With a long term working relationship with the local NGO, Education for Nature Vietnam (ENV), we have worked closely with them on development and implementation of all awareness and environmental education components, with staff receiving training and guidance from ENV management. We have also provide wildlife trade information to ENV’s wildlife trade hotline and helped facilitate confiscations from central Vietnam to rescue centres such as the Turtle Conservation Centre (TCC) of Cuc Phuong National Park in Ninh Binh province. For surveys in Vietnam we have also coordinated with relevant authorities, all surveys have included communications with Forest Protection Departments (FPD) and People Committee in the province, districts or protected areas being surveyed, with meetings pre and post surveys with FPD to discuss survey areas, objectives and findings.
    [Show full text]
  • TCF Summary Activity Report 2002–2018
    Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 1 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Recommended Citation: Turtle Conservation Fund [Rhodin, A.G.J., Quinn, H.R., Goode, E.V., Hudson, R., Mittermeier, R.A., and van Dijk, P.P.]. 2019. Turtle Conservation Fund: A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organi- zations and Individuals—Summary Activity Report 2002–2018. Lunenburg, MA and Ojai, CA: Chelonian Research Foundation and Turtle Conservancy, 54 pp. Front Cover Photo: Radiated Tortoise, Astrochelys radiata, Cap Sainte Marie Special Reserve, southern Madagascar. Photo by Anders G.J. Rhodin. Back Cover Photo: Yangtze Giant Softshell Turtle, Rafetus swinhoei, Dong Mo Lake, Hanoi, Vietnam. Photo by Timothy E.M. McCormack. Printed by Inkspot Press, Bennington, VT 05201 USA. Hardcopy available from Chelonian Research Foundation, 564 Chittenden Dr., Arlington, VT 05250 USA. Downloadable pdf copy available at www.turtleconservationfund.org 2 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 by Anders G.J. Rhodin, Hugh R. Quinn, Eric V. Goode, Rick Hudson, Russell A. Mittermeier, and Peter Paul van Dijk Strategic Action Planning and Funding Support for Conservation of Threatened Tortoises and Freshwater
    [Show full text]
  • Help Us Keep the Turtle Conservation Centre Going Throughout the Current Crisis Right Now, the World Is Going Through an Materials and Some Items of Food
    Asian Turtle Program & Turtle Conservation Centre Protecting today so we can see tomorrow... Keep up to date For more current news and updates on tortoise and freshwater turtle conservation in Asia, visit our website: www.asianturtleprogram.org Big headed turtle (Platysternon megacephalum). Photo credit: Hoang Van Ha – ATP/IMC Help us keep the Turtle Conservation Centre going throughout the current crisis Right now, the world is going through an materials and some items of food. We are also unprecedented crisis; people around the world concerned about the longer term effects of the are in lockdown while we hope and pray that the pandemic. In particular, it might severely impact coronavirus pandemic passes swiftly and with as wild releases of tortoises and freshwater turtles little cost to human life as possible. In Vietnam, and conservation breeding plans for this year and and at the Turtle Conservation Centre (TCC) of next. Cuc Phuong National Park (CPNP), we are also struggling to cope with governmental restrictions; What is frustrating is we have some groups of CPNP was closed to tourists for some weeks and animals who are eligible for release, having just is only now opening up again, and the movement passed through both health screening (including of animals has been severely limited. testing for Mycoplasma and Herpesvirus), and genetic screening. Right now we have almost 70 Although Vietnam has been doing a fantastic Big-headed Turtles (Platysternon megacephalum), job in containing the spread of COVID-19, with 18 Bourret’s Box Turtles (Cuora bourreti), 13 only 288 cases and 0 deaths at the time of writing Indochinese box turtle (Cuora galbinifrons) and (11th May 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • TSA Magazine 2015
    A PUBLICATION OF THE TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE Turtle Survival 2015 RICK HUDSON FROM THE PRESIDENT’S DESK TSA’s Commitment to Zero Turtle Extinctions more than just a slogan Though an onerous task, this evaluation process is completely necessary if we are to systematically work through the many spe- cies that require conservation actions for their survival. Determining TSA’s role for each species is important for long-term planning and the budgeting process, and to help us identify areas around the globe where we need to develop new field programs. In Asia for example, Indonesia and Vietnam, with nine targeted species each, both emerged as high priority countries where we should be working. Concurrently, the Animal Management plan identified 32 species for man- agement at the Turtle Survival Center, and the associated space requirements imply a signifi- cant investment in new facilities. Both the Field Conservation and Animal Management Plans provide a blueprint for future growth for the TSA, and document our long-term commitment. Failure is not an option for us, and it will require a significant investment in capital and expansion if we are to make good on our mission. As if to test TSA’s resolve to make good on our commitment, on June 17 the turtle conser- vation community awoke to a nightmare when we learned of the confiscation of 3,800 Palawan Forest Turtles in the Philippines. We dropped everything and swung into action and for weeks to come, this crisis and the coordinated response dominated our agenda. In a show of PHOTO CREDIT: KALYAR PLATT strength and unity, turtle conservation groups from around the world responded, deploying Committed to Zero Turtle Extinctions: these species that we know to be under imminent both staff and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Assessment of CEPF Investment in the Indo-Burma Hotspot 2008-2013
    Final Assessment of CEPF Investment in the Indo-Burma Hotspot 2008-2013 A Special Report May 2014 1 OVERVIEW The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Conservation International (CI), the European Union, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. CEPF provides strategic assistance to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), community groups and other civil society partners to help safeguard Earth’s biodiversity hotspots: the biologically richest yet most threatened ecosystems. A fundamental goal of CEPF is to ensure that civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. CEPF commenced its investment in the Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot on July 1, 2008, following the approval of an ecosystem profile1 developed with stakeholders’ input and a spending authority of $9.5 million to be awarded over five years. Thanks to additional support from the MacArthur Foundation, the spending authority was increased to $9.9 million in 2012, and the investment period was extended to five-and-a-half years. Figure 1. The Indo-Burma Hotspot 1 The ecosystem profile for the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot is available on the Web, in English at http://www.cepf.net/where_we_work/regions/asia_pacific/indo_burma/ecosystem_profile/Pages/default.aspx and in Vietnamese at http://www.birdlifeindochina.org/sites/default/files/CEPFIndoChina_EP%26info_VN_6Nov08.pdf 2 Indo-Burma is the largest biodiversity hotspot, in terms of land area. It spans mainland Southeast Asia, including all or most of Myanmar (Burma), Thailand, Cambodia, Lao PDR and Vietnam, parts of southern China, and small areas of eastern Bangladesh and northeastern India (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]