The Contribution of Ion Channels in Input-Output Plasticity Dominique Debanne, Michaël Russier
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The contribution of ion channels in input-output plasticity Dominique Debanne, Michaël Russier To cite this version: Dominique Debanne, Michaël Russier. The contribution of ion channels in input-output plasticity. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Elsevier, 2019, 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107095. hal-02363603 HAL Id: hal-02363603 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02363603 Submitted on 14 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 166 (2019) 107095 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neurobiology of Learning and Memory journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynlme The contribution of ion channels in input-output plasticity T ⁎ Dominique Debanne , Michaël Russier UNIS, UMR1072 INSERM – AMU, Marseille, France ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Persistent changes that occur in brain circuits are classically thought to be mediated by long-term modifications Ion channels in synaptic efficacy. Yet, many studies have shown that voltage-gated ion channels located at the input and Activity-dependent plasticity output side of the neurons are also the subject to persistent modifications. These channels are thus responsible Learning for intrinsic plasticity that is expressed in many different neuronal types including glutamatergic principal Memory neurons and GABAergic interneurons. As for synaptic plasticity, activation of synaptic glutamate receptors in- LTP itiate persistent modification in neuronal excitability. We review here how synaptic input can be efficiently LTD fi STDP altered by activity-dependent modulation of ion channels that control EPSP ampli cation, spike threshold or resting membrane potential. We discuss the nature of the learning rules shared by intrinsic and synaptic plas- ticity, the mechanisms of ion channel regulation and the impact of intrinsic plasticity on induction of synaptic modifications. 1. Introduction dependent plasticity (STDP) rule (Abbott & Nelson, 2000; Feldman, 2012) in which positive correlation between excitatory post-synaptic Information storage in the brain is classically thought to result from potentials (EPSPs) and single spikes led to LTP whereas their negative long-lasting modifications of chemical synaptic transmission. Support correlation led to LTD (Bi & Poo, 1998; Debanne, Gahwiler, & to this has been provided by many studies showing up- or down-reg- Thompson, 1998; Feldman, 2000; Markram, Lubke, Frotscher, & ulation of synaptic transmission following specific regimes of synaptic Sakmann, 1997). activity. For instance, long-term synaptic potentiation (LTP) occurs All these synaptic modifications are specific to the synapse stimu- following high frequency stimulation of afferent glutamatergic inputs at lated during the cellular conditioning (Bliss & Collingridge, 1993; many synaptic pathways including the Schaffer collateral-CA1 cell sy- Debanne, Gahwiler, & Thompson, 1994; Malenka, 1991) and may thus napse (Bliss & Collingridge, 1993; Malenka, 1991), mossy-fibre-CA3 allow high capacity of information storage. However, synaptic plasti- cell synapse (Zalutsky & Nicoll, 1990), visual neocortical inputs (Artola city appears to not constitute the sole manner to modify input-output & Singer, 1987), and glutamatergic afferents to inhibitory interneurons function and voltage-gated channels located at the input and output (Lamsa, Heeroma, Somogyi, Rusakov, & Kullmann, 2007). Long-term sides of neurons are also subject to activity-dependent modification synaptic depression (LTD) is induced homosynaptically following low (Debanne, Inglebert, & Russier, 2019; Titley, Brunel, & Hansel, 2017; frequency stimulation of glutamatergic inputs. Evidence for homo- Zhang & Linden, 2003). Here, we review recent in vitro works devoted synaptic LTD has been provided at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 cell sy- to the role of ion channels in the modulation of input-output function in napse (Dudek & Bear, 1992; Mulkey & Malenka, 1992), inputs to visual mammalian neurons. First, we will consider the different ways of cortical neurons (Kirkwood, Dudek, Gold, Aizenman, & Bear, 1993). modulating input-output function at the neuronal scale. Then, we will LTP and LTD have been shown to be induced associatively when a sy- review the learning rules of input-output plasticity on the basis of those naptic input is paired with postsynaptic spiking activity. LTP is induced defined for synaptic modifications. Finally, we will discuss intrinsic at Schaffer collateral inputs when glutamatergic input is synchronously plasticity in GABAergic interneurons, the impact of ion channel reg- paired with burst of action potentials (Gustafsson, Wigstrom, Abraham, ulation on induction of synaptic plasticity and intrinsic plasticity in vivo. & Huang, 1987; Kelso, Ganong, & Brown, 1986; Sastry, Goh, & Auyeung, 1986) whereas LTD results of asynchronous activation of 2. Activity-dependent modulation in input-output function these two stimuli (Debanne et al., 1994, 1996). These forms of asso- ciative synaptic plasticity led to the emergence of the spike-timing- Input-output function is a critical operation at the neuronal scale ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Debanne). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107095 Received 19 June 2019; Received in revised form 4 September 2019; Accepted 16 September 2019 Available online 17 September 2019 1074-7427/ © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. D. Debanne and M. Russier Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 166 (2019) 107095 AB (Magee, 1999). These channels are activated at resting membrane po- Synaptic plasticity Amplified EPSP tential and attenuate EPSP amplitude through their deactivation. Thus, any modulation of h-channels may increase or decrease EPSP-spike coupling (Gastrein et al., 2011). The down-regulation of these channels EPSC EPSC HCN, Kv4 have been shown to enhance EPSP summation (Wang, Xu, Wu, Duan, & Poo, 2003) and input-output function (Campanac, Daoudal, Ankri, & Debanne, 2008) following LTP induction. Kv4.2 is another voltage- gated ion channel located in the dendrites that attenuates both EPSP amplitude and back-propagating action potentials in distal dendrites (Hoffman, Magee, Colbert, & Johnston, 1997). The down-regulation of EPSP Kv4.2 channel activity results in enhancement of both EPSP amplitude C D and local back-propagation (Frick, Magee, & Johnston, 2004; Kim, Jung, Clemens, Petralia, & Hoffman, 2007). As synaptic plasticity, the Threshold modulation Depolarized resting potential modulation of EPSP amplification is generally local as other inputs re- main unchanged (Campanac & Debanne, 2008; Wang et al., 2003). + EPSC EPSC EPSPs are also shaped by small conductance calcium-activated K (SK) HCN, Na/K ATPase channels. Calcium influx through NMDAR has been shown to activate SK channels located in the dendritic spines thus attenuating EPSP am- plitude and duration (Adelman, Maylie, & Sah, 2012; Faber, Delaney, & Sah, 2005; Ngo-Anh et al., 2005). Interestingly, SK channels are Nav, Kv1 downregulated following stimulation of synaptic metabotropic gluta- mate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) resulting in enhancement of EPSP- Fig. 1. Multiple mechanisms of input-output plasticity. (A) Synaptic contribu- spike coupling (Sourdet, Russier, Daoudal, Ankri, & Debanne, 2003). tion to input-output modulation. Potentiation of synaptic transmission through an increase in transmitter release and/or postsynaptic receptor density is Nevertheless, EPSP-spike coupling in cortical neurons is poorly de- characterized by an enhanced excitatory post-synaptic current (EPSC). At the termined by EPSP amplitude and highly dependent on the rate and the axon initial segment (AIS), the excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) be- waveform of dendritic EPSPs (Larkum, Zhu, & Sakmann, 2001). In comes large enough to cross the action potential (AP) threshold. As synaptic cerebellar Purkinje cells, EPSP amplitude has also limited control over strength is regulated, EPSP slope is enhanced. (B) Change in EPSP amplifica- cell firing but pharmacological modulation of SK channel and SK-de- tion. When dendritic HCN or Kv4 channels (green) are regulated, the resulting pendent plasticity strongly regulate spike firing (Ohtsuki & Hansel, EPSP is amplified and crosses the spike threshold. Note that here the synaptic 2018). current (EPSC) is kept constant to clearly distinguish intrinsic from synaptic changes and the initial EPSP slope remains unchanged. These first two mod- ifications (A & B) are local because they do not affect all synaptic inputs. (C) 2.2. Modulation of spike threshold Change in spike threshold. Spike firing increases as a result of hyperpolarization of AP threshold by the regulation of voltage-gated ion channels (Nav or Kv1) located at the AIS. Here again, the excitatory synaptic current (EPSC) remains Input-output function may also be altered via modulation of ion + unchanged. (D) Depolarization of resting membrane potential. Following channels that control the spike threshold (Fig. 1C). Voltage-gated Na + modulation of voltage-gated channels (HCN) or ion pumps