DOCSLIB.ORG

ATFM Delays in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ATFM Delays in Europe Delays decreased in August 2012, with airline delay data for all causes showing an average delay per delayed flight of 25 minutes, this was a decrease of 9.8% in comparison to the delays observed in August 2011. This was the best August punctuality of recent years. Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 FOREWORD This report gives an overview of the delay situation in the European Civil Aviation Conference Area. This report has been prepared by the Central Office for Delay Analysis (CODA), a service of EUROCONTROL. It is based on the EUROCONTROL CODA database which contains delay data provided directly by airlines. The report consists of an overview of the reporting period, a summary of the main delay effects, and a series of charts and graphics, which illustrate the main characteristics of the reporting period. A glossary of terms and abbreviations used throughout the report is given in Annex 1. Airline data from the CODA database contains real recorded delays provided to CODA by airlines and is based on the difference between scheduled time of departure and actual off block time. This report discusses delays from all-causes; for information regarding ATFCM delays see the complementary reports available at http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting Table of Contents 1. Headlines and Overview. ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. All-Causes Departure Delay Summary ................................................................................................... 6 3. All-Causes Arrival Delay Summary ...................................................................................................... 10 4. Summary of Significant Events in July 2012. ........................................................................................ 12 5. Scheduling Indicators............................................................................................................................ 12 A. Year-on-Year Trends in All-Causes Delay Indicators............................................................................ 15 B. Busiest Airport pairs .............................................................................................................................. 16 C. All-causes departure delay by hour....................................................................................................... 17 D. Average Delay per Delayed Flight & Percentage of Flights Delayed at Departure Airports ................. 18 E. Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................... 19 F. Standard IATA Delay Codes (AHM730)................................................................................................ 20 G. Standard IATA Delay Sub-Codes (AHM731) ........................................................................................ 22 H. Correlation between IATA Delay Codes and the CFMU Reasons for Regulation ................................. 23 I. August 2012 CODA coverage of commercial flights in the ECAC region.............................................. 24 © 2012 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) This document is published by EUROCONTROL for information purposes. It may be copied in whole or in part provided that EUROCONTROL is mentioned as the source and to the extent justified by the non-commercial use (not for sale). The information in this document may not be modified without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL. The use of this document is at the user’s sole risk and responsibility. EUROCONTROL expressly disclaims any and all warranties with respect to any content within the document, express or implied. Central Office for Delay Analysis EUROCONTROL 96 Rue de la Fusée B - 1130 Brussels The Central Office for Delay Analysis (CODA) is ISO 9001:2008 certified. Tel: + 32-2 729 33 91 Fax : + 32-2 729 90 04 E-Mail : [email protected] Web Site: http://www.eurocontrol.int/coda Date of publication of this issue: 10/10/2012 EUROCONTROL 2 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 1. Headlines and Overview. August 2012 saw a reduction in all causes of delay when compared to August 2011. Airport delays saw small increases following delays in Brussels as a result of works in progress, an airline strike on the 31st August affected Frankfurt with the airport seeing delays to parking stand unavailability. Amsterdam Schiphol experienced delays due to a historical bomb disposal on the 29th. Weather conditions, particularly low visibility, thunderstorms and winds impacted operations at Brussels, Frankfurt, London Heathrow and Palma airports. The average delay per delayed flight (ADD) for departure traffic as well as for arrival traffic decreased respectively by 2.8 and 2.5 minutes The percentage of flights delayed (by 5 minutes or more) decreased by 3.8 percentage points for departures and 4.4 percentage points for arrivals. Figure 1. Average Delay per Delayed Departure and Percentage of Delayed Departures Comparison Figure 2. Average Delay per Delayed Arrival and Percentage of Delayed Arrivals Comparison EUROCONTROL 3 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 Analysis of the delay causes contributing to the August 2012 average delay per flight of 8.5 minutes (Figure 3) shows a decrease in the contribution of reactionary delay, this was down from 4.6 to 3.58 minutes per flight. ATFM en-route related delays decreased to 0.45 minutes per flight from 0.96 minutes per flight in August 2011. Note: IATA Delay Code 19 (Passengers with Reduced Mobility) is included in airline grouping Figure 3. Primary delay causes, August 2011 vs. August 2012 Figure 4. Primary delay causes, August 2012 EUROCONTROL 4 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 Figure 5. ATFM Share of All-Causes Primary Delay. Looking further into the history of the ATFM proportion of primary delay (Figure 5), the en-route percentage share of the total primary delay minutes was 9.7%, this was the lowest share noted since August 2008. The share of ATFM airport delay increased by 2 percentage points, however ATFCM Airport delay minutes fell by 2% (Figure 4). EUROCONTROL 5 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 2. All-Causes Departure Delay Summary 1 The average delay per flight from all causes of delay decreased compared to August 2011 by 24% to 8.5 minutes per flight (Figure 6). In August 2012, 45% of flights departed within the 5 minute threshold before or after the scheduled departure time. Flights departing >5 minutes ahead of schedule increased by 2 points to 17% (Figure 7) Figure 6. Average delay per flight (All-Causes) for Departures Figure 7. All-Causes Departure Punctuality 2011 vs. 2012 1A flight is considered delayed as from 5 minutes. The analysis was based on airline data provided to CODA. Unless otherwise mentioned, a flight is considered delayed/advanced as from 5 minutes. EUROCONTROL 6 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 Figure 8. Long departure delays >120 minutes Figure 9. Primary and reactionary all-cause delay, by IATA code (%) Figure 9 shows that: Reactionary delay and Technical and Aircraft Equipment saw a decrease in its contribution to the average delay per flight in minutes but their share of delay remained at the similar level as previous year. The ATFM En-Route Demand/Capacity delay in minutes as well as it share dropped compared to August 2011 (0.42 minutes and 3%). EUROCONTROL 7 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 The link from these categories to IATA codes is summarised in Figure 17. Figure 10. All-Causes Delay. Top 20 Affected Departure Airports August 2012 Average Delay Per Average Average Flight Percentage ICAO delay per Delay per Rank Departure airport Percentage Delayed Code departure Delayed Change Departures (mins) Departure (vs. Aug 2011) 1 LISBOA LPPT 20.0 8% 31.5 63.4% 2 MANCHESTER EGCC 14.4 14% 33.5 42.9% 3 LONDON/GATWICK EGKK 12.5 -3% 25.9 48.2% 4 PORTO LPPR 11.9 3% 27.9 42.6% 5 MALAGA LEMG 11.7 -3% 28.5 40.9% 6 ALICANTE LEAL 11.3 -10% 26.6 42.4% 7 IBIZA LEIB 11.2 -19% 27.9 40.3% PALMA DE 8 LEPA 11.2 -38% 26.4 42.5% MALLORCA PARIS CH DE 9 LFPG 10.8 -20% 22.2 48.5% GAULLE 10 LONDON/LUTON EGGW 10.7 -28% 27.6 38.6% BRUSSELS 11 EBBR 10.3 -4% 29.2 35.3% NATIONAL 12 BARCELONA LEBL 10.2 -10% 28.6 35.6% 13 ROME FIUMICINO LIRF 10.1 -29% 21.4 47.4% 14 MADRID BARAJAS LEMD 10.1 -44% 23.7 42.6% 15 NICE LFMN 10.1 -18% 24.6 41.0% 16 LONDON/HEATHROW EGLL 10.0 6% 23.7 42.4% 17 BIRMINGHAM EGBB 9.9 5% 25.5 38.7% 18 ANTALYA LTAI 9.7 -17% 28.0 34.8% 19 GLASGOW EGPF 9.5 -6% 32.0 29.7% FERIHEGY- 20 LHBP 9.4 -17% 26.8 35.1% BUDAPEST Figure 11. Main delay causes at the top 10 affected departure airports Lisbon Airport noted the highest departure delay, where Porto, Malaga and Ibiza Airport suffered the most from reactionary delays and Paris Charles De Gaulle noted the highest share of airline delay. EUROCONTROL 8 CODA Digest – Delays to Air Transport in Europe August 2012 Figure 12. All-Causes delay situation for the 20 most affected airport pairs August 2012 Average Delay Per Average Average Flight Percentage delay per delay per Rank Departure airport Arrival airport Percentage delayed Departure delayed Change Departures (mins) Departure (vs. Aug 2011) AEROPORTO DA 1 LISBOA 22.3 12% 37.2 60.0% MADEIRA 2 LISBOA BARCELONA 19.9 11% 36.0 55.4% 3 LONDON/HEATHROW LISBOA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ibiza Airport 2019
    13/2/2020 PORTADA Ibiza Airport 2019 1/1 18/2/2019 MAPA Ibiza Canary Islands Aena Spanish Airports (excluding MCV, QSA, SBO exclusive for GA) 1/1 18/2/2019 CONTENTS Contents Ibiza Highlights Ibiza Airport Traffic statistics Route maps New routes and new airlines Passenger profile Operational data Infrastructures & facilities Quality, environment & awards Our commitment with the sustainability Incentives & marketing support 1/1 13/2/2020 HIGHLIGHTS Highlights 2019 Ibiza 8,2M % Var. previous year Pax 0,6 % 75,4K % Var. previous year Ops -2,1 % 1,4M % Var. previous year Cargo -11,2 % Source: Aena. Provisional non-audited data 2019 (round trip) 1/1 13/2/2020 HIGHLIGHTS (web) Highlights 2019 Ibiza Avg. pax / week Avg. ops / week 156,8K 1.450 16 38 158 Domestic Low cost 22 Destinations * * * International 70 % Routes Countries 83 Airlines 136 80% holidays H24 airport · Residence · · Runway cap. · 17% IBZ apt. province Ops. dep: 16 23% rest of Spain Ops. arr: 16 Pax profile 60% foreign Info Total ops: 28 Sources: * + 5,000 pax/year. Aena. Provisional non-audited data 2019 (round trip) Aena surveys 1/1 13/2/2020 STATISTICS (Stats) Traffic statistics 2019 Ibiza Annual traffic evolution 5,6 % Pax % Var. Pax CAGR 14,5% 7,9M 8,1M 8,2M 7,4M 6,2M 6,5M 8,5% 6,6% 4,3% 2,5% 0,6% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Monthly traffic evolution 1,38M 1,33M 1,18M 1,15M 1,0M 0,89M 0,71M 0,52M 0,5M 0,24M 0,17M 0,18M 0,21M 0,20M 0,0M 1 Ene 2 Feb 3 Mar 4 Abr 5 May 6 Jun 7 Jul 8 Ago 9 Sep 10 Oct 11 Nov 12 Dic 88 % Source: Summer season Aena.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Capacity
    AIRPORT CAPACITY Looking Beyond the Runway Airport Capacity – Looking Beyond the Runway Introduction Air transportation is a fast-growing industry – regionally, nationally and globally. This growth has in turn created local and global impact in economic and social areas. Increasing air traffic demand now exposes the shortage of airport infrastructure capacity, which will be a crucial issue in the near future. This is especially true for mature air transport markets in the US, Europe and the Asia-Pacific regions, where airport capacity has been affected by different operational, economic and environmental constraints. These constraints have started to impede the future growth of airport and air traffic demand. As we explore constraints to airport capacity, it appears that there is not one clear definition, and that airports are constrained in different ways. This factsheet explores the different definitions of airport capacity, categorizes them in several ways, investigates the influence of airlines on the definition of airport capacity and provides examples of how we can solve these constraints. Defined by capacity as a constraining element 3. Allowed capacity is defined by regulations and legislation that Airport capacity is not a clear-cut phenomenon, with many different balance economic importance definitions depending on the point of view adopted (1). However, against any nuisance that may be everybody agrees that airports are constrained in different ways by caused for local residents. For different types of capacity. We can categorize definitions by considering the instance, a government or other constraining element (Figure 1), and then divide definitions into technical authority might cap the annual capacity, acceptable capacity and allowed capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • 211 REPORT IN-011/2011 LOCATION FLIGHT DATA REPORT CREW Pilot Copilot Pilot Copilot AIRCRAFT Engines DATA SUMMARY INJURIES DAMAG
    REPORT IN-011/2011 DATA SUMMARY LOCATION Date and time Thursday, 14 April 2011; 08:30 UTC1 Site Barcelona Airport AIRCRAFT Registration EI-EKB N366AA Type and model BOEING 737-800 BOEING 767-300 Operator Ryanair American Airlines Engines Type and model CFM 56-7B CF6-80C2B6 Serial Number 22 CREW Pilot Copilot Pilot Copilot Age 34 29 57 51 Licence ATPL(A) CPL(A) ATPL(A) ATPL(A) Total flight hours 6,500 h 750 h 14,995 h 10,010 h Flight hours on the type 2,215 h 500 h 5,005 h 6,297 h INJURIES Fatal Serious Minor/None Fatal Serious Minor/None Crew 614 Passengers 169 225 Third persons DAMAGE Aircraft Minor Minor Third parties None None FLIGHT DATA Operation Commercial Air Transport – Sche- Commercial Air Transport – Sche- duled – International – Passenger duled – International – Passenger Phase of flight Taxiing Taxiing REPORT Date of approval 3 May 2012 1 All times in this report are in UTC unless otherwise specified. 211 Report IN-011/2011 Addenda Bulletin 2/2012 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1. History of the flight On 14 April 2011 at around 08:30, a Boeing 737-800 (B737) operated by Ryanair was taxiing on taxiway K toward the runway 25L holding point at the Barcelona Airport. A Boeing 767-300 (B767), operated by American Airlines, was stopped at position G3, one of the three positions available at this holding point (G1, G2 and G3). In order to access one of the unoccupied positions, the B737 had to pass behind the American Airlines airplane.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Structural Factors Influencing the Survivability Of
    DOT/FAA/TC-16/31 A Study into the Structural Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Factors Influencing the Aviation Research Division Atlantic City International Airport Survivability of Occupants in New Jersey 08405 Airplane Accidents September 2016 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. This document is also available from the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority NOTICE This research was carried out at the request of the United Kingdom Civil Aviation Authority and the United States Federal Aviation Administration. This activity has been carried out in cooperation with the Federal Aviation Administration and the UK Civil Aviation Authority under the auspices of the International Cabin Safety Research Technical Group whose goal is to enhance the effectiveness and timeliness of cabin safety research. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute FAA certification policy. Consult your local FAA aircraft certification office as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center’s Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF).
    [Show full text]
  • FAB Short-List Revealed As Global Gathering of Airport Food & Beverage Operators in Dallas Nears - the Moodie Davitt Report - the Moodie…
    6/12/2019 FAB short-list revealed as global gathering of airport food & beverage operators in Dallas nears - The Moodie Davitt Report - The Moodie… FAB short-list revealed as global gathering of airport food & beverage operators in Dallas nears by The Moodie Davitt Report News Room Source: ©The Moodie Davitt Report 24 May 2019 INTERNATIONAL. A high-class roll-call of food & beverage operations is today revealed in the short-list for the annual Airport FAB Awards to be named in Dallas next month. The Airport Food & Beverage (FAB) Conference & Awards, organised by The Moodie Davitt Report, will be hosted by Dallas Fort Worth International Airport at The Westin Galleria Dallas on 26-27 June. FAB is owned and organised by The Moodie Davitt Report with sister title The Foodie Report. The only industry event dedicated solely to the airport F&B sector, FAB attracts senior representatives from the world’s leading airports, food & beverage concessionaires and brands. “This year’s FAB Awards attracted a record 302 entries, 18% up on last year’s record level. But it was the diversity and quality of entries in FAB 2019 that really impressed.” As announced, HMSHost/Autogrill and SSP Group are Platinum Partners for FAB 2019. Other confirmed sponsors so far include Areas (Gold) Lagardère Travel Retail (Silver) and HWH Hospitality Investments (Bronze). Chick-fil-A is lunch partner; while other partners include Booster Juice, Crews, Grab, High Flying Foods, Jackmont Hospitality, MAG Hospitality, Reco-Air, Robolab (Yanu), Tea Forté, Travel Food Services and TRG Concessions. https://www.moodiedavittreport.com/fab-short-list-revealed-as-global-gathering-of-airport-food-beverage-operators-in-dallas-nears/ 1/11 6/12/2019 FAB short-list revealed as global gathering of airport food & beverage operators in Dallas nears - The Moodie Davitt Report - The Moodie… The Moodie Davitt Report Founder & Chairman Martin Moodie said: “This year’s FAB Awards attracted a record 302 entries, 18% up on last year’s record level.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Hz September 2020 1 of 28
    LIST OF REFERENCES ‐ 400 Hz September 2020 1 of 28 End‐user Segment Product Units Location Year Algiers Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 23 Algeria 2017 BOU‐SAÂDA Helicopter Hangar Airport 2300 ‐ 60 kVA 4 Algeria 2014 Air Algerie Airline 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Air Algerie Airline 2400 ‐ 180 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Protection civile Defence 2400 ‐ 30 kVA w/ARU 2 Algeria 2020 Protection civile Defence 2400 ‐ 30 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Aerolineas Airline 2400 ‐ 60 kVA 1 Argentina 2020 Aerolineas Airline 2400 ‐ 30 kVA 1 Argentina 2016 Austral Airlines Airline 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 1 Argentina 2017 Brisbane Airport Airport 7400 ‐ 90 kVA 1 Australia 2018 Brisbane Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 8 Australia 2013 Darwin Airport Airport 7400 ‐ 90 kVA 5 Australia 2019 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2018 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 9 Australia 2018 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 2 Australia 2017 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 11 Australia 2014 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 22 Australia 2011 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 10 Australia 2011 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2009 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 8 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ 90 kVA w/TRU 14 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 21 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 2 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil
    [Show full text]
  • Balearic Islands, Spain) on 1 September 2015
    CCIAIIAACIAC COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Report IN-031/2015 Incident involving an Airbus A-321-211, registration G-TCDX, operated by Thomas Cook Airlines, while on approach to the Menorca Airport (Balearic Islands, Spain) on 1 September 2015 Report IN-031/2015 Incident involving an Airbus A-321-211, registration G-TCDX, operated by Thomas Cook Airlines, while on approach to the Menorca Airport (Balearic Islands, Spain) on 1 September 2015 SUBSECRETARÍA GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE FOMENTO COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Edita: Centro de Publicaciones Secretaría General Técnica Ministerio de Fomento © NIPO: 161-17-153-6 Depósito Legal: M-24884-2017 Diseño, maquetación e impresión: Centro de Publicaciones COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Tel.: +34 91 597 89 63 E-mail: [email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 http://www.ciaiac.es 28011 Madrid (España) Foreword This report is a technical document that reflects the point of view of the Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC) regarding the circumstances of the accident object of the investigation, and its probable causes and consequences. In accordance with the provisions in Article 5.4.1 of Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Convention; and with articles 5.5 of Regulation (UE) nº 996/2010, of the European Parliament and the Council, of 20 October 2010; Article 15 of Law 21/2003 on Air Safety and articles 1., 4. and 21.2 of Regulation 389/1998, this investigation is exclusively of a technical nature, and its objective is the prevention of future civil aviation accidents and incidents by issuing, if necessary, safety recommendations to prevent from their reoccurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of REFERENCES AXA Power Coil
    Page 1 of 2 January 2017 LIST OF REFERENCES AXA Power Coil AIRPORT Country Year Number of Units Number of Units AXA 2200/2300 AXA 2400 Power Coil Power Coil Zvartnots International Airport Armenia 2007 7 Brisbane Airport Australia 2013 8 Melbourne Airport Australia 2009-11-14 36 Perth Airport Australia 2010-11-13 27 Bahrain Royal Stand Bahrain 2010 2 Minsk Airport Belarus 2014 2 Dubrovnik Airport Croatia 2016 2 Larnaca Airport Cyprus 2008 22 Copenhagen Airport Denmark 2008-10 4 Tallinn Airport Estonia 2007-08 8 Finnavia Finland 2011 2 Aéroport International Martinique Aimé Césaire France (French West Indies) 2014 14 Biarritz Airport France 2007 2 Lille Airport France 2014 6 Lyon Airport France 2008-16 16 6 Toulon Airport France 2008 2 Erfurt-Weimar Airport Germany 2016 1 Germania Germany 2015 1 Hannover Airport Germany 2006-08-12-16 13 2 Lufthansa Technik, Munich Germany 2016 2 Hong Kong International Airport Hong Kong 2011-12-14-15 6 Bangalore Airport India 2008-13 22 Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. India 2010 83 Mumbai Airport India 2015 70 Dublin Airport Ireland 2016 2 Shannon Airport Ireland 2006-08 5 Milan Malpensa Airport Italy 2011-12 25 Venice Airport Italy 2014 11 Queen Alia International Airport Jordan 2010-12-15 25 Jomo Kenyatta Int'l Airport (JKIA), Nairobi Kenya 2014-15 14 Almaty Airport Khazakstan 2008 12 Astana Airport Khazakstan 2016 6 Pristina Airport Kosovo 2013 4 Kuwait Airport Kuwait 2008 4 Riga International Airport Latvia 2016 5 Bamako-Sénou International Airport Mali 2012-16 4 2 New Ulaanbaatar International Airport Mongolia 2016 6 Cacablanca Airport Morocco 2009 10 Moroccan Airports Authority Morocco 2015 4 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Netherlands 2010-11-12-16 59 4 Auckland Intl.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz Gpus AIRPORTS
    Page 1 of 15 January 2017 LIST OF REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz GPUs AIRPORTS Alger Airport Algeria 2005 Zvartnots Airport Armenia 2007 Brisbane Airport Australia 2013 Melbourne Airport Australia 2011-14 Perth Airport Australia 2011-12-13 Klagenfurt Airport Austria 1993 Vienna International Airport Austria 1995-2001-14-15 Bahrain International Airport Bahrain 2010-12 Minsk Airport Belarus 2014 Brussels International Airport Belgium 2001-02-08-15-16 Charleroi Airport Belgium 2006 Sofia Airport Bulgaria 2005 Air Burkina Burkina Faso 2004 Punta Arenas Chile 2001 Santiago Airport Chile 2011 Pointe Noitre Airport Congo Brazzaville 2009-10 Dubrovnik Airport Croatia 2014-16 La Habana Airport Cuba 2010 Larnaca Airport Cyprus 2008 Ostrava Airport Czech Republic 2010 Prague Airport Czech Republic 1996-97-2002-04-05-07-12-14-16 Aalborg Airport Denmark 1997-98-99-2012-15 Billund Airport Denmark 1999-2000-02-08-12-13-16 Copenhagen Airports Authorities Denmark 89-93-99-2000-01-03-07-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16 Esbjerg Airport Denmark 2007-08-14 Hans Christian Andersen Airport (Odense) Denmark 1991-95-2015 Roenne Airport Denmark 1993 Karup Airport Denmark 1997-2016 Curacao Airport Dutch Antilles 2007 Cairo Intl. Airport Egypt 2015 Tallinn Airport Estonia 2004-05-14 Aéroport de Malabo Equatorial Guinea 2012 Vága Floghavn Faroe Islands 2015 Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Finland 1996-97-2000-05-06-09-10-13-14 Rovaniemi Airport Finland 2000 Turku Airport Finland 2014 Aéroport d’Aiglemont for Prince Aga Khan France 20007 Aéroport de Biarritz France 2009 Aéroport de Brest
    [Show full text]
  • Download, Display, Print, Reproduce and Distribute This Material in Unaltered Form (Retaining This Notice)
    ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report – AR-2008-018(1) Final Runway excursions Part 1: A worldwide review of commercial jet aircraft runway excursions ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report AR-2008-018(1) Final Runway excursions Part 1 A worldwide review of commercial jet aircraft runway excursions - i - Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 62 Northbourne Ave, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: 1800 020 616; from overseas + 61 2 6257 4150 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117; from overseas + 61 2 6247 3117 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2009. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN and formal report title: see ‘Document retrieval information’ on page v.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Services Content
    AEROSPACE SERVICES CONTENT NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING 2 METROLOGY AND CALIBRATION 3 OIL AND FUEL LABORATORIES 4 CERTIFICATION 5 ENVIRONMENT 6 AIRPORT 7 SUPPLY CHAIN INSPECTION AND TECHNICAL ASSITANCE 8 CE MARKING 9 EMC TESTING 10 GLOBAL REACH WHO ARE SGS is the world’s leading inspection, verification, testing and certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. With more than 95,000 em- WE? ployees, SGS operates a network of over 2,400 offices and laboratories around the world. INDSUTRY EXPERTISE Our NDT division has more than 200 NDT technicians (levels II and III) who are highly qualified to provide the highest level of service and expertise. SGS, as an EASA 145 aircraft maintenance center, has the experience and capabilities to satisfy a wide variety of customers needs within the aerospace sector. Other approvals, including NADCAP, are evidence of our high performance and experience in the industry, with clients such as EADS, Airbus, R&R and more. CONTACT: To speak to our North American aerospace team, use the contact information below. +1 844 730 4175 (toll-free) [email protected] 1 NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING SGS is the world’s leading inspection services company, providing: BENEFITS • Experience and knowledge in aeronautical maintenance and the manufacturing Our comprehensive range of NDT industry methods can help you to: • Availability of human and material resources • Detect defects and irregularities • Localized service in aviation parts and assets before they result in damage or SGS boasts several accreditations specific to the aeronautical sector, including: non-compliance • Ensure safe and reliable operation of your fleet or • NADCAP aerospace products • EASA Part 145 • Gain NDT services and composite inspection during fabrication • CESSNA AUTHORIZED INDEPENDENT NDI FACILITY in different sites, under our NADCAP approval NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING TAILORED TO THE AVIATION INDUSTRY We offer the most effective NDT methods tailored to the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]