DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Modern Editors and the Value of Middle English Literature By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Modern Editors and the Value of Middle English Literature By Early Modern Editors and the Value of Middle English Literature by Cameron Bryce Burt A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English, Theatre, Film & Media University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright Ó 2019 by Cameron Bryce Burt Burt ii Abstract This study examines the emergence of editorial figures in sixteenth-century editions of Sir Isumbras, Robert Henryson’s Fables, John Lydgate’s Serpent of Division, and Geoffrey Chaucer’s poetry. I argue that the increasing alterity of Middle English texts in the early modern period compelled editorial interventions designed to make the texts accessible as well as to identify, to emphasize, or to establish the texts’ relevance to contemporary audiences. Early editors managed and controlled the contents and appearance of the books in which the older literary texts appeared in order to redefine their value and purpose for a new audience. They accomplished this with practices such as editing the primary text, collecting or contributing paratext, selecting or designing codicological features, as well as through methods I have termed “codicological translation,” “gathering and framing,” and “selective copying and purposeful omission.” By comparing what these editors say they are doing in their prefatory writings to the results of their editorial contributions, my methodology allows me to determine what these early editors believed themselves to be doing, why, and in what context. These insights have significant implications for the study of both early modern book history and literature. Specifically, they contribute to developing academic conversations among critics like Stephanie Trigg, Tim William Machan, and A.E.B. Coldiron concerning the influence and authority of editors and craftspeople in the production of early modern books. Burt iii Acknowledgements Financial support in the form of fellowships, scholarships and awards from the following academic units at the University of Manitoba helped to alleviate the travel and research costs of this project: the Faculty of Graduate Studies; the Faculty of Arts; the Department of English, Theatre, Film and Media; and the Institute for the Humanities. I am thankful for their support. Much of this project is the result of research conducted at libraries in the United Kingdom. I am grateful for the support of each library’s staff, including those of the Bodleian Library, Oxford; the British Library, London; University Library, Cambridge; the National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh; and the Gonville and Caius College Library, Cambridge. I offer a heartfelt thank you to Marianne Harnish, Anita King, and Darlene McWhirter— the amazing administrative team of the Department of English, Theatre, Film and Media—who helped me throughout my graduate career in more ways than I can recall. I would also like to thank everyone who has helped, encouraged, or inspired me in one way or another. In particular, thank you to Glenn Clark, who offered a great deal of support and encouragement from the project’s original inception until its final publication. As well, thank you to Robert Finnegan, who inspired my initial fascination with Middle English literature and shaped my early scholarship. I am deeply appreciative of the members of my dissertation committee: Drs. David Watt, Judith Owens, Roisin Cossar, and Murray McGillivray. Each member offered encouragement and support, as well as probing questions and invaluable feedback. I am grateful for each member’s contributions. I am especially indebted to my advisor, Dr. Watt, without whom this project would not have come to fruition. It was a pleasure to work with each of you; thank you. Finally, thank you to my family, whose patience has proven truly to have no limits. Burt iv Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... iii Note on References ........................................................................................................................ v Abbreviated Sources ..................................................................................................................... vi Introduction: Early Modern Editors and the Value of Middle English Literature ......................... 1 Chapter 1: The Phenomenon of Sixteenth-Century Editors ........................................................ 18 Chapter 2: William Caxton and the Rise of the English Editor.................................................... 49 Chapter 3: Textual Editing and the Popularity of Sir Isumbras.................................................... 82 Chapter 4: Englishing Late-Medieval Exempla: Henryson’s Moral Fables and Lydgate’s Serpent of Division ............................................................................ 117 Chapter 5: Thomas Speght’s Chaucer: Alterity, Continuity and Progress ................................ 163 Chapter 6: From Print to Manuscript: Restoring Cambridge, University Library MS Gg.4.27 ........................................................................................................ 201 Conclusion: Found and Lost ...................................................................................................... 232 Appendix A: Reconstructing the Print Tradition of Sir Isumbras.............................................. 241 Appendix B: Isumbras’s Substantive Variants .......................................................................... 245 Appendix C: Additional Lines in Isumbras’s t-Branch Texts ................................................... 262 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................... 264 Burt v Note on References In this study, I strive for thoroughness and consistency when quoting texts and describing manuscripts and printed books. Unless otherwise identified, all quotes from manuscripts are based on my own transcriptions and cited by folio. Early printed books are cited by signature except in cases of very large books that provide sufficient foliation (e.g., John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments [1583]). Prefatory pages that do not provide suitable signatures—either no signature or symbols not reasonably reproduced—are assigned lower case letters (e.g., a1). Signatures of prefatory pages signed A when the beginning of the primary text is also assigned A are subsequently changed to lower case letters. Unless identified, signatures beyond Z in books that repeat their signatures as single letters (e.g., A) are changed to double letters (e.g., Aa). Regardless of how printed books sign double letters (e.g., AA, A2, AB, etc.), double letters are always cited as a single upper-case letter followed by the same letter in lower case (e.g., Aa). The same method is applied to signatures beyond Zz, Zzz, etc. (e.g., Aaa, Aaaa, etc.). In cases where a range of signatures are cited (e.g., Aa-Bbb), readers should be aware that most early printed books do not include “j” or “v” in their signatures, limiting the range of a single set of letters to twenty-four quires. Quoted text is not adjusted for type unless more than one type is used in the primary source. For example, if a page of the primary text is printed entirely in italic, the italic is not reproduced in the quotation. However, if a page printed in blackletter includes select words in Roman, the Roman will be reproduced in italic in the quote. Italics in quoted text are used to represent difference, not italics. Important type distinctions are identified in-text. When quoting primary sources, I endeavour to provide a diplomatic transcription that follows the following conventions: I convert long “s”s (ſ) to the modern short “s” (s). Abbreviations marked by a macron (e.g., cōffession) are expanded in square brackets (e.g., Burt vi co[n]fession). Printed yoghs (ʒ) used in place of “y”s have been corrected and printed thorns (þ) have been modernized as “th.” Virgules (/) are converted to commas (,). Forward slashes (/) in this thesis represent line breaks. Abbreviated Sources CHBB Cambridge History of the Book STC Short Title Catalogue, 2nd Edition ESTC English Short Title Catalogue estc.bl.uk EEBO Early English Books Online https://eebo.chadwyck.com MED Middle English Dictionary MER Database of Middle English Romance middleenglishromance.org.uk OED Oxford English Dictionary www.oed.com ODNB Oxford Dictionary of National Biography www.oxforddnb.com SRealm The Statutes of the Realm, vol.3 (1509-1545) Burt 1 Introduction: Early Modern Editors and the Value of Middle English Literature What did early modern editors think about the Middle English texts that they prepared? This question may seem paradoxical since the concept of an editor had not been fully realized in the first century and a quarter of printing in England: the earliest printers tended to edit texts themselves, the earliest editors were not explicitly associated with the text, and the term “editor” was not used in our modern sense until the early eighteenth century. However, the increasing prevalence of editorial figures and practices in sixteenth-century printed books suggests that such interventions were part of a broader cultural phenomenon of specialization in the process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Arms on the Chaucer Tomb at Ewelme with a Note on the Early Manorial History
    The Arms on the Chaucer Tomb at Ewelme with a note on the early manorial history . of the parish by E. A. GREENING LAMBORN ALTHOUGH representing one of the largest and most interesting collec­ ..r-\. tions of mediaeval coats to be found on any tomb in England, the arms on the Chaucer tomb at Ewelme have never been competently examined, so that the persons represented by them have been only partially, and sometimes incorrectly, identified. The most recent account of them, in the otherwise admirable notes on the church compiled by a late rector, is of little genealogical or heraldic value; and the account in the first volume of the Oxford Journal of Monumental Brasses is of no value at all : , Others to some faint meaning make pretence But Shadwell never deviates into sense.' its author's competence may be judged by his description of ' time-honoured Lancaster' as ' the Duke of Gaunt.' Sir Harris Nicolas, who wrote the Memoir prefixed to the Aldine Chaucer of 1845, realised that the solution of the problem was the construction of a pedigree; but the tree he drew up was quite inade­ quate for the purpose. The earliest record of the coats is in the notebook of Richard Lee, Port­ cullis, who sketched them for his Gatherings of Oxfordshire on his Visitation of the County in 1574. It is now in the Bodleian (Wood MS. D. 14), and a page of it, showing some of the shields on the Ewelme tombs, was reproduced in facsimile in the Harleian Society'S volume of the Visitations of Oxfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Apish Art': Taste in Early Modern England
    ‘THE APISH ART’: TASTE IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND ELIZABETH LOUISE SWANN PHD THESIS UNIVERSITY OF YORK ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE JULY 2013 Abstract The recent burgeoning of sensory history has produced much valuable work. The sense of taste, however, remains neglected. Focusing on the early modern period, my thesis remedies this deficit. I propose that the eighteenth-century association of ‘taste’ with aesthetics constitutes a restriction, not an expansion, of its scope. Previously, taste’s epistemological jurisdiction was much wider: the word was frequently used to designate trial and testing, experiential knowledge, and mental judgement. Addressing sources ranging across manuscript commonplace books, drama, anatomical textbooks, devotional poetry, and ecclesiastical polemic, I interrogate the relation between taste as a mode of knowing, and contemporary experiences of the physical sense, arguing that the two are inextricable in this period. I focus in particular on four main areas of enquiry: early uses of ‘taste’ as a term for literary discernment; taste’s utility in the production of natural philosophical data and its rhetorical efficacy in the valorisation of experimental methodologies; taste’s role in the experience and articulation of religious faith; and a pervasive contemporary association between sweetness and erotic experience. Poised between acclaim and infamy, the sacred and the profane, taste in the seventeenth century is, as a contemporary iconographical print representing ‘Gustus’ expresses it, an ‘Apish Art’. My thesis illuminates the pivotal role which this ambivalent sense played in the articulation and negotiation of early modern obsessions including the nature and value of empirical knowledge, the attainment of grace, and the moral status of erotic pleasure, attesting in the process to a very real contiguity between different ways of knowing – experimental, empirical, textual, and rational – in the period.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPERS DELIVERED at SHARP CONFERENCES to DATE (Alphabetically by Author; Includes Meeting Year)
    PAPERS DELIVERED AT SHARP CONFERENCES TO DATE (alphabetically by author; includes meeting year) Abel, Jonathan. Cutting, molding, covering: media-sensitive suppression in Japan. 2009 Abel, Trudi Johanna. The end of a genre: postal regulations and the dime novel's demise. 1994 ___________________. When the devil came to Washington: Congress, cheap literature, and the struggle to control reading. 1995 Abreu, Márcia Azevedo. Connected by fiction: the presence of the European novel In Brazil. 2013 Absillis, Kevin. Angele Manteau and the Indonesian connection: a remarkable story of Flemish book trade (1958-1962). 2006 ___________. The biggest scam in Flemish literature? On the question of linguistic gatekeeping In literary publishing. 2009 ___________. Pascale Casanova's The World Republic of Letters and the analysis of centre-periphery relations In literary book publishing. 2008 ___________. The printing press and utopia: why imaginary geographies really matter to book history. 2013 Acheson, Katherine O. The Renaissance author in his text. 1994 Acerra, Eleonora. See Louichon, Brigitte (2015) Acres, William. Objet de vertu: Euler's image and the circulation of genius in print, 1740-60. 2011 ____________. A "religious" model for history: John Strype's Reformation, 1660-1735. 2014 ____________, and David Bellhouse. Illustrating Innovation: mathematical books and their frontispieces, 1650-1750. 2009 Aebel, Ian J. Illustrating America: John Ogilby and the geographies of empire in Restoration England. 2013 Agten, Els. Vernacular Bible translation in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century: the debates between Roman Catholic faction and the Jansenists. 2014 Ahokas, Minna. Book history meets history of concepts: approaches to the books of the Enlightenment in eighteenth-century Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge in the Mist by Graham Turner Richard III Society, Inc. Vol
    Richard III Society, Inc. Vol. 42 No. 1 April, 2011 Challenge in the Mist by Graham Turner Dawn on the 14th April 1471, Richard Duke of Gloucester and his men strain to pick out the Lancastrian army through the thick mist that envelopes the battlefield at Barnet. Printed with permission l Copyright © 2000 In Richard’s Footsteps, 2010 Ricardian Tour Cover In This Issue Challenge in the Mist by Graham Turner Prints of this painting, and others of Richard III and In the Footsteps of King Richard III: 2010 the Wars of the Roses, are available from Studio 88 • Ricardian Tour, Pam Butler …3 www.studio88.co.uk • Studio 88 Ltd, PO Box 568, Aylesbury, Bucks. HP17 8ZX, England • phone/fax Towton Battlefield: Richard’s Cross to +44 (0)1296 338504. Bear, G. Peter Algar …14 York Minster stained glass of Richard III’s coat of In Memory of Frank Murph, arms. Public domain image from WikiMedia Commons (wikimedia.org) Mary Miller …15 ©2011 Richard III Society, Inc., American Branch. No The Duke of Gloucester and Edward V’s part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or Convocation, Annette Carson …16 by any means mechanical, electrical or photocopying, recording or information storage retrieval—without American Branch -- Academic Support written permission from the Society. Articles submitted Laura Blanchard …17 by members remain the property of the author. The Ricardian Register is published four times per year. Ricardian Reading, Myrna Smith …21 Subscriptions are available at $20.00 annually. In the belief that many features of the traditional accounts of AGM: FIFTY YEARS OF LOOKING the character and career of Richard III are neither FOR RICHARD, Nita Musgrave …37 supported by sufficient evidence nor reasonably tenable, the Society aims to promote in every possible way A Word from the Editor …38 research into the life and times of Richard III, and to Pull-out inserts–center of Register: secure a re-assessment of the material relating to the period, and of the role in English history of this monarch.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Missals Printed for Wynkyn De Worde
    TWO MISSALS PRINTED FOR WYNKYN DE WORDE GEORGE D. PAINTER, DENNIS E. RHODES, AND HOWARD M. NIXON The British Library has recently acquired two important and exceedingly rare editions of the Sarum Missal. These mere produced in Paris m I4gj and i^ii for Wynkyn de Worde and others., and are fully described in the second and third sections of this article. The first section gives a brief general account of the printing of the Sarum Missal for the English market during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. I THE English printers of the fifteenth century seemed curiously reluctant to print the major service-books of their own national liturgy, the rite of Sarum. This apparent disinclination cannot be explained by any lack of a market for such works. The Sarum Missal, above all, was certainly in greater demand than any other single book in pre- Reformation England, for every mass-saying priest and every church or chapel in the land was obliged to own or share a copy for daily use. Yet it is a striking fact that of the twelve known editions of the Sarum Missal during the incunable period all but two were printed abroad, in Paris, Basle, Venice, or Rouen, and imported to England. The cause of this paradoxical abstention was no doubt the inability of English printers to rise to the required magnificence of type-founts and woodcut decoration, and to meet the exceptional technical demands of high-quality red-printing, music printing, and beauty of setting, which were necessary for the chief service-book of the Roman Church in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Books Published in Paris, 1501-1540
    Latin Books Published in Paris, 1501-1540 Sophie Mullins This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 6 September 2013 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Sophie Anne Mullins hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 76,400 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2007 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2007; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [2007] and 2013. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, …..., received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by …… Date 2/5/14 signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date 2/5/14 signature of supervisor ……… 3. Permission for electronic publication: (to be signed by both candidate and supervisor) In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteenth Century Literary Culture with Particular
    FIFTEENTH CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR* REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, **FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY Elizabeth Ann Urquhart Submitted for the Degree of Ph.!)., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. .1 ''CONTENTS page SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ill INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 The Stafford Family 1066-1521 12 CHAPTER 2 How the Staffords could Afford Patronage 34 CHAPTER 3 The PrIce of Patronage 46 CHAPTER 4 The Staffords 1 Ownership of Books: (a) The Nature of the Evidence 56 (b) The Scope of the Survey 64 (c) Survey of the Staffords' Book Ownership, c. 1372-1521 66 (d) Survey of the Bourgchiers' Book Ownership, c. 1420-1523 209 CHAPTER 5 Considerations Arising from the Study of Stafford and Bourgchier Books 235 CHAPTER 6 A Brief Discussion of Book Ownership and Patronage Patterns amongst some of the Staffords' and Bourgchiers' Contemporaries 252 CONCLUSION A Piece in the Jigsaw 293 APPENDIX Duke Edward's Purchases of Printed Books and Manuscripts: Books Mentioned in some Surviving Accounts. 302 NOTES 306 TABLES 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY 379 FIFTEENTR CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. Elizabeth Ann Urquhart. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. SUMMARY The aim of this study is to investigate the nature of the r61e played by literary patronage in fostering fifteenth century English literature. The topic is approached by means of a detailed exam- ination of the books and patronage of the Stafford family.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EARLY MODERN BOOK AS SPECTACLE by PAULINE
    THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY: THE EARLY MODERN BOOK AS SPECTACLE by PAULINE E. REID (Under the Direction of Sujata Iyengar) ABSTRACT This dissertation approaches the print book as an epistemologically troubled new media in early modern English culture. I look at the visual interface of emblem books, almanacs, book maps, rhetorical tracts, and commonplace books as a lens for both phenomenological and political crises in the era. At the same historical moment that print expanded as a technology, competing concepts of sight took on a new cultural prominence. Vision became both a political tool and a religious controversy. The relationship between sight and perception in prominent classical sources had already been troubled: a projective model of vision, derived from Plato and Democritus, privileged interior, subjective vision, whereas the receptive model of Aristotle characterized sight as a sensory perception of external objects. The empirical model that assumes a less troubled relationship between sight and perception slowly advanced, while popular literature of the era portrayed vision as potentially deceptive, even diabolical. I argue that early print books actively respond to these visual controversies in their layout and design. Further, the act of interpreting different images, texts, and paratexts lends itself to an oscillation of the reading eye between the book’s different, partial components and its more holistic message. This tension between part and whole appears throughout these books’ technical apparatus and ideological concerns; this tension also echoes the conflict between unity and fragmentation in early modern English national politics. Sight, politics, and the reading process interact to construct the early English print book’s formal aspects and to pull these formal components apart in a process of biblioclasm.
    [Show full text]
  • LIT 372 Topics in Early Modern Literature
    John Jay College of Criminal Justice The City University of New York New Course Proposal When completed, this proposal should be submitted to the Office of the Associate Provost for consideration by the College Curriculum Committee. 1. Department (s) proposing this course: English 2. Title of the course: Topics in Early Modern Literature Abbreviated title (up to 20 characters): TPCS LIT Early Mod 3. Level of this course: ___100 Level ____200 Level ___X__300 Level ____400 Level 4. Course description as it is to appear in the College bulletin: (Write in complete sentences except for prerequisites, hours and credits.) Topics in Early Modern Literature will examine major and minor literary movements, authors, or ideas at work in sixteenth and seventeenth century literature with an eye to the formal features of texts as well as the social, historical, and political contexts in which they appeared. The course will approach the canon for this period not as a fixed entity but as a body of work consistently open to reevaluation and critique; alternative texts, voices, and subject positions relevant to the topic(s) will be included. As a means of understanding the literature of the period, the course may focus on a literary genre or convention (e.g., drama, sonnet) or an important theme (e.g., the Other in literature, hierarchy, literature of love, monarchy in crisis). The specific focus of the course will be determined by the individual professor and may be concerned exclusively with English literature, Western Literature more broadly, or Western and nonWestern literature. Pre-requisite: ENG 102/201 Co-requisite: LIT 2XX (Introduction to Literary Study) or permission of the instructor.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation, Early Printing, and Gender in England, 1484-1535
    05fl_23.1_hosington.qxd 2008/11/19 16:00 PM Page 41 Translation, Early Printing, and Gender in England, 1484-1535 Brenda M. Hosington Translation cannot be divorced from the context in which it flourishes, that is, from the linguistic, literary, social, and cultural developments taking place at a given time and in a given setting. Nor can it be fully comprehended without a consideration of certain ideological impulses. One of the socio-cultural developments affecting translation in the years 1484-1535 is the introduction of printing to England. One of the ideological con- cerns in the period also affecting translation is that of gender. Both intersect in the pro- duction of translations concerning women and women’s issues, of which there is a sig- nificant number. These, I think, should be considered against the backdrop of early printing in England, for printers and patrons often had specific agendas in mind, moti- vated by ideological concerns — be they religious, moral, or commercial — which dic- tated not only the choice of texts to be published but also the editorial changes to be made within those texts. As Lotte Hellinga has pointed out, the history of printing reflects two dynamics that are in varying balance — the obvious one that is commercial and borne of the printer’s need to cover expenses and make a profit, and the more complex one that is non-commercial and relates to the power of the printed text to disseminate knowledge, implant new ideas, and so on.1 The first, the commercial aspect, has been an ongoing consideration in the history of print.
    [Show full text]