A Systems Engineering Reference Model for Fuel Cell Power Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Systems Engineering Reference Model for Fuel Cell Power Systems A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING REFERENCE MODEL FOR FUEL CELL POWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT T. L. BLANCHARD Bachelor of Arts in Physics Cleveland State University December, 1999 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY November, 2011 © Copyright by T. L. Blanchard 2011 This Thesis has been approved for the Department of Mechanical Engineering And the college of Graduate Studies by Chairperson, Professor L. Kenneth Keys Date Mechanical Engineering Department Professor Paul P. Lin Date Mechanical Engineering Department Professor Walter Kocher Date Civil & Environmental Engineering Department DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my mother, who taught me the value of observation, examination and, the appreciation of the quest for answers. She taught me that even the greatest of obstacles could be surmounted and the greatest task could be accomplished if one, fueled by the desire to persevere, used three gifts: the knowledge of knowing what needs to be achieved, the willingness to do the diligence of working hard to accomplish and lastly, the ability to tolerate the (sometimes, painful) discomfort of personal growth. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the help of numerous others. I have been blessed with good people who have been with me in good and bad times. They should share the pride I feel because they are a big part of what I have been able to accomplish. It is with immense gratitude that I acknowledge the support and help of my Professor, Dr. L. Kenneth Keys, for his sage advice, insightful criticisms, and patient encouragement in the writing of this thesis in innumerable ways. I would also like to thank Dr. Christopher Milliken, currently the Group Leader and the Production Manager at Technology Management Inc. whose steadfast support of this project was greatly needed and deeply appreciated. Much appreciation and gratitude to Benson Lee and Michael Petrik for giving me the opportunity to work in the fuel cell industry. This achievement would have been impossible to reach without the technical, business and entrepreneurial insights of Benison Lee and Dr. Robert Ruhl. I cannot find words to express my gratitude to Melinda Grigson for her help. Melinda‘s technical writing and computer skills are par excellent. Lastly, but not least, I owe my deepest gratitude to my father and the rest of my family for their undying support and love! A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING REFERENCE MODEL FOR FUEL CELL POWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT T. L. BLANCHARD ABSTRACT This research was done because today the Fuel Cell (FC) Industry is still in its infancy in spite over one-hundred years of development has transpired. Although hundreds of fuel cell developers, globally have been spawned, in the last ten to twenty years, only a very few are left struggling with their New Product Development (NPD). The entrepreneurs of this type of disruptive technology, as a whole, do not have a systems engineering ‗roadmap‘, or template, which could guide FC technology based power system development efforts to address a more environmentally friendly power generation. Hence their probability of achieving successful commercialization is generally, quite low. Three major problems plague the fuel cell industry preventing successful commercialization today. Because of the immaturity of FC technology and, the shortage of workers intimately knowledgeable in FC technology, and the lack of FC systems engineering, process developmental knowledge, the necessity for a commercialization process model becomes evident. vi This thesis presents a six-phase systems engineering developmental reference model for new product development of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Power System. For this work, a stationary SOFC Power System, the subject of this study, was defined and decomposed into a subsystems hierarchy using a Part Centric Top-Down, integrated approach to give those who are familiar with SOFC Technology a chance to learn systems engineering practices. In turn, the examination of the SOFC mock-up could gave those unfamiliar with SOFC Technology a chance to learn the basic, technical fundamentals of fuel cell development and operations. A detailed description of the first two early phases of the systems engineering approach to design and development provides the baseline system engineering process details to create a template reference model for the remaining four phases. The NPD reference template model‘s systems engineering process, philosophy and design tools are presented in great detail. Lastly, the thesis draws an overall picture of the major commercialization challenges and barriers (both technical and non-technical) that SOFC developers‘ encounter. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………….. …vi LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………… ..vii CHAPTER I THE PURPOSE AND THE OUTLINE OF THE THESIS………………… …….1 1.1 Introduction…….…………………………………………………. 1 1.2 The Thesis‘ Focus and Oranganization….………………………. 2 1.3 The Breakdown of the Thesis……………………………………...3 II INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………... 5 2.1 The History of Energy Sources and Technology Change………… 5 2.2 The Energy Technology S-Curve………………………………….6 2.3 Non-renewable Energy Source – Wood…………………………...8 2.4 Non-renewable Energy Source – Coal as Fuel…………………….8 2.5 Non-renewable Energy Source – Whale Oil…………………….. ..9 1.6 Non-renewable Energy Source - Crude Oil………………………. 9 2.7 Non-renewable Energy Source – Natural Gas…………………... 10 2.8 Non-renewable Energy Source – Nuclear Energy………………. 11 2.9 Renewable Energy Sources are Needed………………………… 12 2.10 Types of Renewable Energy Sources…………………………….13 2.11 Solar Power Systems……………………………………………..13 2.12 Wind Farms……………………………………………………… 14 2.13 Wind and Fuel Cell Technologies Combo………………………. 14 2.14 Biofuels…………………………………………………………. 15 viii 2.15 Algaculture………………………………………………………. 17 2.16 Hydrogen Production on the Spot………………………………. 18 2.17 A Few of the Accelerators of the SOFC Power System…………19 2.18 The Engineering Stages of a System (Product) Lifecycle………. 19 2.19 The Proper Implementation of Systems Engineering…………… 20 2.20 A Total Life-cycle Approach……………………………………. 23 2.21 The Reasons Products Fail and What Can Be Done About It……24 III THE HISTORY OF FUEL CELLS, THEIR MATERIALS, THE GIRD AND THE NEGAWTT…………………………………………………. 31 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………… 31 3.2 From Davy‘s Experiments………………………………………. 32 3.3 Faraday, Hittorf and Others………………………………………32 3.4 Cavendish……………………………………………………….. 34 3.5 Grove, Mond and Langer……………………………………….. 35 3.6 Ostwald‘s Predictions…………………………………………… 37 3.7 Nernst…………………………………………………………… 38 3.8 What were Helmholtz and Ostwald doing? …………………….. 39 3.9 The Search for the Dry Fuel Cells………………………………. 41 3.10 Temperature Ranges and Materials…………………………….. 41 3.11 The Bacon Cell………………………………………………….. 41 3.12 The Patents Mill…………………………………………………. 42 3.13 Fuel Cells through the 1950s, the 1960s, and the 1970s………… 43 3.14 Almost a Hit in the 1990s……………………………………….. 44 3.15 The Meaning of Success………………………………………… 44 3.16 One in a Million? ……………………………………………….. 45 ix 3.17 Bloom Energy…………………………………………………… 45 3.18 One in a Large, Large Crowd…………………………………… 46 3.19 Meeting the Needs of Power Hungry Cities……………………. 49 3.20 Look there! We are grid locked! ……………………………….. 51 3.21 Improvements coming? ………………………………………… 53 3.22 Enter the Smart Grid…………………………………………….. 54 3.23 The Anatomy of the Grid and the Smart Grid‘s Function………. 54 3.24 Governmental and Customer Support for the Smart Grid - A Future Vision………………………………………………. 56 3.25 Obstacles the Smart Grid………………………………………... 58 3.26 Up in Thin Air – Negawatt……………………………………….58 3.27 Typical Electric Power Supply Systems………………………… 60 3.28 The Cost of Power………………………………………………. 64 3.29 Conclusion………………………………………………………. 67 IV THE INTRODUCTION TO THE SIX PHASE LIFECYCLE REFERENCE MODEL FOR INNOVATIVE/DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES……... 69 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………………… 69 4.2 Key‘s System Life Cycle Approach……………………………...70 4.3 The Learning Curve for SOFCs – Rivera-Tinoco (et al)………... 77 4.4 The General Learning Curve and Rivera-Tinoco‘s Model……… 80 4.5 System Engineering, Cost and Life-Cycle Engineering - Key Approach………………………………………………. 82 4.6 The NIST/NSPE Reference Document Modified by Keys……… 82 4.7 The System View – From Keys‘ and Blanchard‘s Perspectives….83 4.8 Systems Configuration Management – From Keys‘ And Blanchard‘s Perspective………………………………... 85 x 4.9 Quality Systems Engineering Management - From Keys‘ and Blanchard‘s Perspective…………………….85 4.10 Reliability Systems Engineering Management - From Keys‘ and Blanchard‘s Perspective ……………………86 4.11 Systems Testing Engineering - From Keys‘ and Blanchard‘s Perspective …………………….86 4.12 Concurrent Engineering – From Keys‘ and Blanchard‘s Perspective …………………...87 4.13 Conclusion – Playing the Game – The Players…………………. 92 V THE INRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND ADVANCE PLANNING PHASE – PHASE ONE……………………………………95 5.1 Introduction……………………………………………………… 95 5.2 The Conceptual Design & Advance Planning Phase……………. 95 5.3 The Major Activities of the Conceptual Design & Advance Planning Phase………………………………………………….96 5.4 In the Early Part of the Phase – The Major Focus………………. 97 5.5 The Middle Part of the Phase – The Major Focus………………. 98 5.6 The End of the Phase – The Major Focus……………………….. 99 5.7 Advance Planning……………………………………………… 100 5.8 The Milestones of the Conceptual Design and Advance Planning Phase consists
Recommended publications
  • Fuel Properties Comparison
    Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Markets for Hydrogen Vehicles: Lessons from LPG
    Making Markets for Hydrogen Vehicles: Lessons from LPG Helen Hu and Richard Green Department of Economics and Institute for Energy Research and Policy University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT United Kingdom Hu: [email protected] Green: [email protected] +44 121 415 8216 (corresponding author) Abstract The adoption of liquefied petroleum gas vehicles is strongly linked to the break-even distance at which they have the same costs as conventional cars, with very limited market penetration at break-even distances above 40,000 km. Hydrogen vehicles are predicted to have costs by 2030 that should give them a break-even distance of less than this critical level. It will be necessary to ensure that there are sufficient refuelling stations for hydrogen to be a convenient choice for drivers. While additional LPG stations have led to increases in vehicle numbers, and increases in vehicles have been followed by greater numbers of refuelling stations, these effects are too small to give self-sustaining growth. Supportive policies for both vehicles and refuelling stations will be required. 1. Introduction While hydrogen offers many advantages as an energy vector within a low-carbon energy system [1, 2, 3], developing markets for hydrogen vehicles is likely to be a challenge. Put bluntly, there is no point in buying a vehicle powered by hydrogen, unless there are sufficient convenient places to re-fuel it. Nor is there any point in providing a hydrogen refuelling station unless there are vehicles that will use the facility. What is the most effective way to get round this “chicken and egg” problem? Data from trials of hydrogen vehicles can provide information on driver behaviour and charging patterns, but extrapolating this to the development of a mass market may be difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light Duty Vehicles
    Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles An MIT Energy Initiative Symposium April 19, 2012 MIT Energy Initiative Symposium on Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles | April 19, 2012 C Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles An MIT Energy Initiative Symposium April 19, 2012 ABOUT THE REPORT Summary for Policy Makers The April 19, 2012, MIT Energy Initiative Symposium addressed Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles. The symposium focused on natural gas, biofuels, and motor gasoline as fuels for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) with a time horizon of the next two to three decades. The important transportation alternatives of electric and hybrid vehicles (this was the subject of the 2010 MITEi Symposium1) and hydrogen/fuel-cell vehicles, a longer-term alternative, were not considered. There are three motivations for examining alternative transportation fuels for LDVs: (1) lower life cycle cost of transportation for the consumer, (2) reduction in the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint of the transportation sector (an important contributor to total US GHG emissions), and (3) improved energy security resulting from greater use of domestic fuels and reduced liquid fuel imports. An underlying question is whether a flex-fuel/bi-fuel mandate for new LDVs would drive development of a robust alternative fuels market and infrastructure versus alternative fuel use requirements. Symposium participants agreed on these motivations. However, in this symposium in contrast to past symposiums, there was a striking lack of agreement about the direction to which the market might evolve, about the most promising technologies, and about desirable government action.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Day Taxi Report May Through July 2019
    DATE: October 10, 2019 TO: SFMTA Board of Directors Malcolm Heinicke, Chair Gwyneth Borden, Vice Chair Cheryl Brinkman, Director Amanda Eaken, Director Steve Heminger, Director Cristina Rubke, Director Art Torres, Director THROUGH: Tom Maguire Interim Director of Transportation FROM: Kate Toran Director of Taxis and Accessible Services SUBJECT: Second Quarterly Report on Taxi Medallion Rules at San Francisco International Airport: May – July 2019 Introduction The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is providing a regular quarterly update to the Board regarding the implementation of the new airport taxi rules, which imposed restrictions on the types of taxi medallions that are authorized to provide a taxicab trip originating at San Francisco International Airport (SFO or Airport). The first quarterly report provides background information and tracks the first quarter of implementation of the new SFO rules, February through April 2019. This second quarterly report tracks progress in meeting the policy goals, from the time period from May through July, comparing the three-month time period in 2018 “before” with the same three-month period in 2019 “after” the Airport rule changes. Comparing the same three-month period from year to year helps exclude any seasonal variation, and assures the comparison is for the same number of days in the quarter; both factors can significantly impact taxi ridership. One major continuing issue is with poor data quality sent by the taxicabs, aggregated by color scheme, and transmitted by their dispatch service and/or data provider. The transmittals contain a large amount of data that do not appear to be valid trip or activity records, and inconsistencies vary across different dispatch companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z
    Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 1 Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z (The Aerospace En- gines, A-Z) Versión 12 2018 por Ricardo Miguel Vidal * * * -MOTOR: Máquina que transforma en movimiento la energía que recibe. (sea química, eléctrica, vapor...) Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 Este facsímil es < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 ORIGINAL si la Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © página anterior tiene Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 2 el sello con tinta Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal VERDE Edición: 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Presentación de la edición 2018-V12 (Incluye todas las anteriores versiones y sus Apéndices) La edición 2003 era una publicación en partes que se archiva en Binders por el propio lector (2,3,4 anillas, etc), anchos o estrechos y del color que desease durante el acopio parcial de la edición. Se entregaba por grupos de hojas impresas a una cara (edición 2003), a incluir en los Binders (archivadores). Cada hoja era sustituíble en el futuro si aparecía una nueva misma hoja ampliada o corregida. Este sistema de anillas admitia nuevas páginas con información adicional. Una hoja con adhesivos para portada y lomo identifi caba cada volumen provisional. Las tapas defi nitivas fueron metálicas, y se entregaraban con el 4 º volumen. O con la publicación completa desde el año 2005 en adelante. -Las Publicaciones -parcial y completa- están protegidas legalmente y mediante un sello de tinta especial color VERDE se identifi can los originales.
    [Show full text]
  • FUJI ELECTRIC REVIEW Vol.65-No.3,2019
    Whole Number 266, ISSN 0429-8284 FUJI ELECTRIC REVIEW 2019 Vol.65 No. 3 Energy Solutions Contributing to Stable and Optimal Power Supply Energy Solutions Contributing to Stable and Optimal Power Supply Vol.65 No.3 2019 No.3 Vol.65 Printed on recycled paper Fuji Electric Korea Co., Ltd. Overseas Subsidiaries Sales of power distribution and control equipment, drive control equipment, Non-consolidated subsidiaries rotators, high-voltage inverters, electronic control panels, medium- and * large-sized UPS, and measurement equipment Tel +82-2-780-5011 America URL http://www.fujielectric.co.kr/ Fuji Electric Corp. of America Fuji Electric Co.,Ltd. (Middle East Branch Offi ce) Sales of electrical machinery and equipment, semiconductor devices, drive Promotion of electrical products for the electrical utilities and the industrial control equipment, and devices plants Tel +1-732-560-9410 Tel +973-17 564 569 URL https://americas.fujielectric.com/ Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. (Myanmar Branch Offi ce) Reliable Turbine Services LLC Providing research, feasibility studies, Liaison services Repair and maintenance of steam turbines, generators, and peripheral Tel +95-1-382714 equipment Tel +1-573-468-4045 Representative offi ce of Fujielectric Co., Ltd. (Cambodia) 2019 Providing research, feasibility studies, Liaison services Energy Solutions Contributing to Stable and Optimal Fuji SEMEC Inc. Tel +855-(0)23-964-070 Vol.65 No. Power Supply Manufacture and sales of door opening and closing systems 3 Europe Tel +1-450-641-4811 Fuji Electric is engaged in stabilizing and optimizing electric power Asia Fuji Electric Europe GmbH Sales of electrical/electronic machinery and components supply by supporting power infrastructure through reliable technologies Fuji Electric Asia Pacifi c Pte.
    [Show full text]
  • Entityname Filenumber "D" PLATINUM CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC L00005029984 #Becauseoffutbol L.L.C. L00005424745 #KIDSMA
    EntityName FileNumber "D" PLATINUM CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC L00005029984 #BecauseOfFutbol L.L.C. L00005424745 #KIDSMATTERTOO, INC N00005532057 #LIVEDOPE Movement N00005462346 (2nd) Second Chance for All N00004919509 (H.E.L.P) Helping Earth Loving People N00005068586 1 800 Water Damage North America, LLC L00005531281 1 city, LLC L00005556347 1 DUPONT CIRCLE, LLC L00005471609 1 HOPE LLC L00005518975 1 Missouri Avenue NW LLC L00005547423 1 P STREET NW LLC L42692 1 S Realty Trust LLC L00005451539 1 SOURCE CONSULTING Inc. 254012 1 Source L.L.C. L00005384793 1 STOP COMMERCIAL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT, LLC L00005531370 1% for the Planet, Inc. N00005463860 1,000 Days N00004983554 1,000 DREAMS FUND N00005415959 10/40 CONNECTIONS, N00005517033 100 EYE STREET ACQUISITION LLC L00004191625 100 Fathers, The Inc. N00005501097 100 Property Partners of DC LLC L00005505861 100 REPORTERS N0000000904 1000 47th Pl NE LLC L00004651772 1000 CONNECTICUT MANAGER LLC L31372 1000 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE LLC L30799 1000 VERMONT AVENUE SPE LLC L36900 1001 17th Street NE L.L.C. L00005524805 1001 CONNECTICUT LLC L07124 1001 PENN LLC L38675 1002 3RD STREET, SE LLC L12518 1005 17th Street NE L.L.C. L00005524812 1005 E Street SE LLC L00004979576 1005 FIRST, LLC L00005478159 1005 Rhode Island Ave NE Partners LLC L00004843873 1006 Fairmont LLC L00005343026 1006 W St NW L.L.C. L00005517860 1009 NEW HAMPSHIRE LLC L04102 101 41ST STREET, NE LLC L23216 101 5TH ST, LLC L00005025803 101 GALVESTON PLACE SW LLC L51583 101 Geneva LLC L00005387687 101 P STREET, SW LLC L18921 101 PARK AVENUE PARTNERS, Inc. C00005014890 1010 25TH STREET LLC L52266 1010 IRVING, LLC L00004181875 1010 VERMONT AVENUE SPE LLC L36899 1010 WISCONSIN LLC L00005030877 1011 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE LLC L17883 1012 13th St SE LLC L00005532833 1012 INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Fuel Cell Market Report, November 2010
    Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy 2009 FUEL CELL MARKET REPORT NOVEMBER 2010 Authors This report was written primarily by Bill Vincent of the Breakthrough Technologies Institute in Washington, DC, with significant assistance from Jennifer Gangi, Sandra Curtin, and Elizabeth Delmont. Acknowledgement This report was the result of hard work and valuable contributions from government staff and the fuel cell industry. The authors especially wish to thank Sunita Satyapal, Nancy Garland and the staff of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Fuel Cell Technologies Program for their support and guidance in the preparation of this report. The authors also wish to thank Robert Rose and Robert Wichert of the U.S. Fuel Cell Council, Lisa Callaghan-Jerram of Fuel Cell Today Consulting, Rachel Gelman of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Jennifer Gangi, Sandra Curtin, and Elizabeth Delmont from Fuel Cells 2000, and the many others who made this report possible. Table of Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Financials......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Fuel Cells
    2016 FUEL CELLS SECTION 3.4 Fuel Cells Fuel cells efficiently convert diverse fuels directly into electricity without combustion, and they are key elements of a broad portfolio for building a competitive, secure, and sustainable clean energy economy. They offer a broad range of benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions; reduced oil consumption; expanded use of renewable power (through the use of hydrogen derived from renewable resources as a transportation fuel as well as for energy storage and transmission); highly efficient energy conversion; fuel flexibility (use of diverse, domestic fuels, including hydrogen, natural gas, biogas, and methanol); reduced air pollution, criteria pollutants, water use; and highly reliable grid support. Fuel cells also have numerous advantages that make them appealing for end users, including quiet operation, low maintenance needs, and high reliability. Because of their broad applicability and diverse uses, fuel cells can address critical challenges in all energy sectors: commercial, residential, industrial, and transportation. The fuel cell industry had revenues of approximately $2.2 billion in 2014, an increase of almost $1 billion over revenues in 2013.1 The largest markets for fuel cells today are in stationary power, portable power, auxiliary power units, backup power, and material handling equipment. Approximately 155,000 fuel cells were shipped worldwide in the four-year period from 2010 through 2013, accounting for 510–583 MW of fuel cell capacity.2 In 2014 alone, more than 50,000 fuel cells accounting for over 180 MW of capacity were shipped.1 In transportation applications, manufacturers have begun to commercialize fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs). Hyundai and Toyota have recently introduced their FCEVs in the marketplace, and Honda is set to launch its new FCEV in the market in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • An Initiative Supported by Disclaimer
    An initiative supported by Disclaimer: The views and analyses represented in the documents do not necessarily reflects that of Shakti. The company accepts no liability for the content of this document, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. The information and opinions in this document were prepared by India Smart Grid Forum (ISGF). ISGF has no obligation to communicate with all or any readers of this document when opinions or information in this document change. We make every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information but we do not claim that it is accurate or complete. In no event shall ISGF or its members be liable for any damages, expenses, loss of data, opportunity or profit caused by the use of the material or contents of this document. Acknowledgement ISGF would like to express our sincere gratitude to Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation who gave ISGF an opportunity to do this wonderful project on the Smart Grids. Shakti Foundation works to strengthen the energy security of India by aiding the design and implementation of policies that support energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable Urban Transport. We would like to give special thanks to following Contributors and Reviewers of this handbook: Contributors and Reviewers 1. Akshay Ahuja 2. Amol Sawant 3. Amritha C. 4. Anamika Bhargava 5. Hem Thukral 6. Larisa Dobriansky 7. Mahesh Patankar 8. Pradeep Yemula 9. Rahul Vikram 10. Reji Kumar Pillai 11. Sonia Shukla 12. Vijay Sonavane Table of Content CHAPTER 1: 21ST
    [Show full text]
  • Data Driven Path to Economic and Ecological Sustainability: a Roadmap for Community Choice Innovation
    Data Driven Path to Economic and Ecological Sustainability: A Roadmap for Community Choice Innovation January 2017 North Bay Clean Energy Forum This page intentionally blank. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Audacious Idea ............................................................................................................................... 1 A New Strategy for Climate Leadership ................................................................................................. 2 Core Concepts ................................................................................................................................... 3 Practical Program Steps and Initial Pilot Studies ................................................................................ 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Appendix A: Economic Analysis of 100% Conversion to Zero Emission Building and Transport .......... 11 Real World Example......................................................................................................................... 11 Switching from Natural Gas Heating/Cooling Appliances to Electric Appliances ........................... 13 Reduction of GHGs through Purchase/Lease of EVs or High Mileage Vehicles ............................ 14 Grid Consumed Electricity Emissions
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregation Business Framework
    Aggregation business framework Yasuhiro HAYASHI (WASEDA University) - Dean, Advanced Collaborative Research Organization for Smart Society (ACROSS) - Director, Research Institute of Advanced Network Technology (RIANT) - Professor, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Major in Electrical Engineering and Bioscience June 9, 2017 Agenda 1. Background 2. Communication standard for aggregation 3. Aggregation business 4. Future prospects and efforts 2 Energy saving and renewable energy for low-carbon society COP21-Paris Agreement Japan committed to reduce CO2 emissions by 26% compared to 2013. Expand into policy Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry: Energy Innovation Strategy (April 2016) Cabinet Office: Energy and environment innovation strategy NESTI2050 (April 2016) Plan to arrest global warming (May 2016) Currently, Japan depends heavily on overseas fossil fuels (High geopolitical risk) It is important to realize the energy mix centered on energy saving and renewable energy. 3 Electric Power System Reform & Markets 1. Keep stable supply Electric Power 2. Suppress electricity price System Reform 3. Expanding choices of customers and business opportunities 2015 2016 ~2020 Establishment of the Organization for Cross- regional Coordination 1st of Transmission reform Operators (OCCTO) nd Period of 2 Full retail transitional reform competition arrangement for Abolishment retail tariff of retail tariff 3d Legal unbundling of reform transmission / distribution sector Hour-Ahead Market Negawatt Market Real-time Market Spot
    [Show full text]