DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Technical Report for Phase I Perris Valley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Technical Report for Phase I Perris Valley BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT FOR PHASE I PERRIS VALLEY STORM DRAIN CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PERRIS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, LLP 1900 Main Street 5th Floor Irvine, California 92614-7321 Contact: John Condas Phone: (949) 851-5551 Prepared By: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. 1940 E. Deere Avenue, Suite 250 Santa Ana, California 92705 Phone: (949) 340-3851 Report Preparer: Martin Rasnick/Lesley Lokovic September 10, 2020 i INFORMATION SUMMARY A. Report Date: September 10, 2020 B. Report Title: Biological Technical Report for the Phase I Perris Valley Storm Drain Channel Improvement Project Located in the City of Perris, Riverside County, California. C. Project Site Location: USGS 7.5’ series Perris Quadrangle, City of Perris, Riverside County, Township 4 South, Range 3 West, Section 8, 850 feet north of the Ramona Expressway, 1,600 feet south of East Rider Street, east of Redlands Avenue. D. Owner/Applicant: Steve Hollis IDIL Rider 2, LLC and IDIL Rider 4, LLC 840 Apollo Street Suite 343 El Segundo, California 90245 Phone: (213) 334-4804 Email: [email protected] E. Principal Investigator: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA) 1940 E. Deere Avenue, Suite 250 Santa Ana, California 92705 Phone: (949) 340-3851 Report Preparer: Martin Rasnick/Lesley Lokovic F. Report Summary: A biological study was performed for the proposed Phase I Perris Valley Storm Drain Channel Improvement Project (Phase I/Project) Study Area located in the City of Perris, Riverside County, California. The Project would make improvements to an approximate 3,491 linear-foot segment of the Perris Valley Storm Drain (PVSD) and adjacent uplands located east of Redlands Avenue from an area approximately 100 feet north of East Morgan Street to an area approximately 120 feet south of East Rider Street. Phase I improvements will be constructed in connection with the development of the Rider 2 and 4 Warehouse Project (Rider 2 and 4), which is located adjacent to the site. The biological resources and impacts associated with Rider 2 and 4 have been addressed separately as part of a separate standalone report1. This document provides the results of field studies performed to evaluate the potential occurrence of biological resources and the requirements triggered by environmental laws and regulations. The site is within the 1 Biological Technical Report for the Rider 2 and Rider 4 Warehouse Project, located in the City of Perris, Riverside County, California. Prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates (November 2019). ii Mead Valley Area Plan of the Western Riverside County Multiple-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), but outside of Criteria Cells and survey areas for mammals and amphibians, as well as outside of core and linkage areas. The Phase I Project Study Area occurs in the Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area, Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area, and Burrowing Owl Survey Area for the MSHCP. The PVSD is classified as Public/Quasi-Public (PQP) Conserved Lands by the MSHCP. Habitat assessments were performed for special-status plants and animals, and evaluations were performed to determine the presence/absence of federal and/or state jurisdictional waters and wetlands, including MSHCP Riparian/Riverine areas and vernal pools. The Project Study Area does not support potential habitat for riparian birds or fairy shrimp. The Project Study Area supports both state and federal jurisdictional waters and MSHCP Riparian/Riverine areas. No vernal pools are present. The Project is expected to increase the overall limits of Corps/Regional Board, CDFW, and MSHCP Riparian/Riverine habitats and PQP Conserved Lands by at least 20 acres. A focused habitat assessment for rare plants was performed and suitable habitat was determined to be absent from the site. A focused survey for burrowing owl was performed and the species was determined to be absent from the site. There is no proposed or designated Critical Habitat present. G. Individuals Conducting Fieldwork: Lesley Lokovic Gamber, GLA Trina Ming, GLA April Nakagawa, GLA Martin Rasnick, GLA David Smith, GLA Jillian Stephens, GLA iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Scope of Work .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project Description ............................................................................................... 2 1.4 Relationship of the Project Site to the MSHCP ................................................... 3 1.4.1 MSHCP Background .................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Relationship of the Project Site to the MSHCP ............................................ 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Summary of Surveys ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 Botanical Resources ............................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 Literature Search ........................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Vegetation Mapping ...................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Special-Status Plant Species and Habitats Evaluated for the Project Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.4 Botanical Surveys ......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Wildlife Resources ............................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 General Surveys ............................................................................................ 8 2.3.2 Special-Status Animal Species Evaluated for the Project Study Area ......... 9 2.3.3 Habitat Assessment for Special-Status Animal Species ............................... 9 2.3.4 Focused Surveys for Special-Status Animals Species .................................. 9 2.4 Jurisdictional Delineation ................................................................................... 10 2.5 MSHCP Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools .......................................... 11 3.0 REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................... 11 3.1 Endangered Species Acts ................................................................................... 12 3.1.1 California Endangered Species Act ............................................................ 12 3.1.2 Federal Endangered Species Act ................................................................ 12 3.1.3 State and Federal Take Authorizations ....................................................... 13 3.1.4 Take Authorizations Pursuant to the MSHCP ............................................ 13 3.2 California Environmental Quality Act ............................................................... 14 3.2.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15380 ............................................................... 14 3.2.2 Special-Status Plants, Wildlife and Vegetation Communities Evaluated Under CEQA ............................................................................................................. 14 iv 3.3 Jurisdictional Waters .......................................................................................... 16 3.3.1 Army Corps of Engineers ........................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board ...................................................... 18 3.3.3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife ............................................... 19 4.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 20 4.1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................... 20 4.2 Vegetation Mapping ........................................................................................... 20 4.2.1 Developed ................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Ruderal (Upland) ........................................................................................ 21 4.2.3 Ruderal (Channel) ....................................................................................... 21 4.2.4 Disturbed Southern Riparian Scrub ............................................................ 21 4.3 Special-Status Vegetation Communities ............................................................ 21 4.4 Special-Status Plants .......................................................................................... 22 4.4.1 Special-Status Plants Detected at the Project Study Area .......................... 30 4.5 Special-Status Animals ...................................................................................... 30 4.5.1 Special-Status Wildlife Species Observed within the Project Study Area . 36 4.5.2 Special-Status Wildlife Species Not Observed but with a Potential to Occur at the Project Study Area .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia Robusta) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in Canada Scarlet Ammannia 2014 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2014. Recovery Strategy for the Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. XXI pp. + Appendix. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover illustration: © Emmet J. Judziewicz Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de l’ammannie robuste (Ammannia robusta) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2014. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE SCARLET AMMANNIA (Ammannia robusta) IN CANADA 2014 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of British Columbia has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the “Recovery Strategy for the scarlet ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in British Columbia and Ontario” (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • LFLT V27 N3-4 Drft 5
    Southern California Botanists NON-PROFIT ORG. 2017 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1500 North College Avenue U.S. POSTAGE Claremont, CA 91711-3157 PAID Expenses for 2017 Claremont, CA Printing (Leaflets and Crossosoma): $5,109.05 Address Service Requested PERMIT NO. 147 Symposium (supplies + speaker costs + banquet mixer) $5,295.68 Research grants $4,000.00 Mailing $470.44 Taxes $177.03 Merch. (T-shirts + Sticker printing) $873.85 Board insurance $1,769.00 Volume 27 Number 3 & 4 May-August 2018 Storage rent $718.00 Sponsorships (CNPS, NCB) $1,200.00 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Supplies (storage, table, chairs, office) $119.79 ALTHOUGH WE DIDN’T have a sequel to the Bank Fees $60.00 original 'Miracle March' of 1991, March of 2018 Total Expenditures $20,274.89 will be remembered as a month that saved spring Income for 2017 for much of California. Rainfall totals in areas Membership $6,664.54 such as Ventura and Santa Barbara increased from Publication sales $670.00 less than 15% of average to more than 50% of average in one month. The series of storms that Merchandise sales $1,869.00 came during March triggered wildflower blooms Symposium (registration+banquet) $5,056.18 Interest $42.28 throughout much of northern and central Susan Hobbs auction $1,440.00 California and more isolated displays throughout Gifts $1,810.00 southern California. Precipitation from Los Dividend insurance $102.77 Angeles south to San Diego remains extremely Total Income low with less than 30% of the average $17,654.77 precipitation having fallen to date. Regardless of Account summary for the end of 2017 the low rainfall amounts, wildflower blooms are still being seen by those willing to venture beyond Checking end of 2017 = $13,025.56 roadside stops (an exception is the Grapevine, Savings end of 2017 = $56,083.00 APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP PayPal balance end of 2017 = $1,566.85 where the finest show in years is currently in full ___Individual (family) $25.00 Leaflets of the display from I-5).
    [Show full text]
  • Noteworthy Collections from Tempe Towne Lake Riverbed
    Noteworthy Collections from Tempe Town Lake Riverbed Item Type Article Authors Makings, Elizabeth; Butler, Lane; Chew, Matthew; Stromberg, Juliet Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 02/10/2021 06:39:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/556794 Tempe Towne Lake Makings et. a!. 3 Noteworthy Collections from (south of Lake Pleasant). She was investigating propagule (seed) banks from soil samples collected at various depths, and A. coc­ Tempe Towne Lake Riverbed cinea emerged in a growth chamber. There have been 5 more col­ lections since 1998: L. McGill 7196- north of the Willcox Playa, Cochise County, in 1999; E. Makings 1620- St. David Cienega Elizabeth Makings along the San Pedro River, Cochise County, in 2003; J. White 163 Lane Butler - Salt River at Price Drain under Loop 101 in Tempe, Maricopa County, in 2006; D. Jenke 164- Salt River Bed at the Tres Rios Matthew Chew Wetlands, Maricopa County, in 2007; and most recently, E. Mak­ Juliet Stromberg ings et al. 3535- in the river bed of Tempe Towne Lake, 9 weeks School of Life Sciences after the failure of the bladder dams. Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287-4501 In an e-mail communication, Shirley Graham, a Lythraceae ex­ [email protected] pert from the Missouri Botanical Garden, confirmed the identity of this particular species, and had this to say regarding the genus: "A Tempe Towne Lake is a water body created by inflatable bladder drying, previously flooded habitat is ideal for Ammannia and the dams that were constructed along the highly regulated and for­ irregular appearance of the genus at any one locality of this kind merly-perennial Salt River in Phoenix, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Plant Species Known to Occur at Canaveral National Seashore
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Canaveral National Seashore, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/256 ON THE COVER Pitted stripeseed (Piriqueta cistoides ssp. caroliniana) Photograph by Sarah L. Corbett. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Canaveral National Seashore, 2009 Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/256 Michael W. Byrne and Sarah L. Corbett USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 and Joseph C. DeVivo USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network University of Georgia 160 Phoenix Road, Phillips Lab Athens, Georgia, 30605 March 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulicaria Arabica (L.) Cass. Et Rhanterium Adpressum Coss
    REPUBLIQUE ALGERIENNE DEMOCRATIQUE ET POPULAIRE MINISTERE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT SUPERIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE UNIVERSITE LARBI BEN M’HIDI -OUM El BOUAGHI- FACULTE DES SCIENCES EXACTES ET DES SCIENCES DE LA NATURE ET DE LA VIE DEPARTEMENT DES SCIENCES DE LA NATURE ET DE LA VIE N° d’ordre :………… N° de série :………… MEMOIRE présenté pour l’obtention du diplôme de Magister En BIOCHIMIE APPLIQUEE Option: Biochimie des produits naturels d’origine végétale Thème : Extraction des métabolites secondaires de plantes médicinales: Pulicaria arabica (L.) Cass. et Rhanterium adpressum Coss. & Durieu. Et evaluation de leurs propriétés bioactives Présenté par : Djermane Nadia Soutenu le 30 juin 2014 devant le jury : Président: Pr. Snoussi Med Mourad UNIVERSITE LARBI BEN M’HIDI-OEB Rapporteur: Pr. Gherraf Noureddine UNIVERSITE LARBI BEN M’HIDI-OEB Examinateur: Pr. Zellagui Amar UNIVERSITE LARBI BEN M’HIDI-OEB Examinateur: Dr. Arhab Rabeh UNIVERSITE LARBI BEN M’HIDI-OEB Année universitaire 2013-2014 SOMMAIRE REMERCIEMENT-DEDICACE……………………………………………………………………………………………………. I LISTE DES ABRIVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. II LISTE DES TABLEAUX……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III LISTE DES FIGURES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 ETUDE BIBLIOGRAPHIQUE I. Les métabolites secondaires……………………………………………………………………………………………….. I.1.Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 I.2.Classification…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 I.2.1.Les
    [Show full text]
  • Dodecahema Leptoceras): Geomorphic Analysis
    Final Report: Characterizing the Habitat of Slender-Horned Spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras): Geomorphic Analysis by Ms. Yvonne Wood, Ph.D. Candidate ." .. • Department of Soils and Environmental Sciences University of California-Riverside Riverside, CA 92521 and Dr. Stephen G. Wells, Adjunct Professor, UC-Riverside and Executive Director and Research Professor Quaternary Sciences Center Desert Research Institute P.O. Box 60220 Reno, NV 89506 Prepared for" Mary Meyer, Plant Ecologist, Region 5 California Department of Fish and Game 330 Golden Shore Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 Funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Section 6 Funds Contract Number FG4632-R5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Statement of Purpose The slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) is a state and federally-listed endangered species found solely in Southern Califomia. It is threatened by extinction due to the rapid pace of development in this region. This plant is found associated with fluvial and alluvial fan sediments related to streams draining the Transverse (San Gabriel) and Peninsular (San Bernardino and San Jacinto) Mountain Ranges. Known occurrences of Dodecahema are not in active channels but are typically found on nearby stream terraces and alluvial fan surfaces which have been estimated to be the result of 100 year flooding events (M. Meyer, 1994, pers. comm.). Recorded populations are spatially distinct from one another and have shown no areal increase in historic times (M. Meyer, 1994, pers. comm.). Little is understood about this species' method of dispersal; and while seeds can be propagated under greenhouse conditions, the resulting plants produce few seeds. Thus, there is great concern about the future viability of Dodecahema leptoceras (DOLE) as increased alteration of its habitat occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama
    The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama T. Wayne Barger1* and Brian D. Holt1 1Alabama State Lands Division, Natural Heritage Section, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Montgomery, AL 36130 *Correspondence: wayne [email protected] Abstract provides public lands for recreational use along with con- servation of vital habitat. Since its inception, the Forever The Red Hills Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) is a 1785 ha Wild Program, managed by the Alabama Department of property that was acquired in two purchases by the State of Conservation and Natural Resources (AL-DCNR), has pur- Alabama Forever Wild Program in February and Septem- chased approximately 97 500 ha (241 000 acres) of land for ber 2010. The RHFWT is characterized by undulating general recreation, nature preserves, additions to wildlife terrain with steep slopes, loblolly pine plantations, and management areas and state parks. For each Forever Wild mixed hardwood floodplain forests. The property lies tract purchased, a management plan providing guidelines 125 km southwest of Montgomery, AL and is managed by and recommendations for the tract must be in place within the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural a year of acquisition. The 1785 ha (4412 acre) Red Hills Resources with an emphasis on recreational use and habi- Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) was acquired in two sepa- tat management. An intensive floristic study of this area rate purchases in February and September 2010, in part was conducted from January 2011 through June 2015. A to provide protected habitat for the federally listed Red total of 533 taxa (527 species) from 323 genera and 120 Hills Salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti Highton).
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Native Plant Record, Volume 17, Number 1, December
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 53 Volume 17, December 2017 VASCULAR FLORA OF E. C. HAFER PARK, EDMOND, OKLAHOMA Gloria M. Caddell Katie Christoffel Carmen Esqueda Alonna Smith Department of Biology University of Central Oklahoma Edmond, OK 73007 [email protected] Keywords: floristic inventory, urban park, Cross Timbers, non-native, invasive ABSTRACT E. C. Hafer Park is located on the western edge of the Cross Timbers ecoregion, in central Oklahoma within the City of Edmond. The park contains post oak-blackjack oak forest, tallgrass prairie, riparian forest, and areas developed for recreational activities. A vascular plant inventory conducted during 2013, 2015, 2016, and 2017 yielded 270 species in 190 genera and 65 families. The largest families were the Asteraceae (46 species), Poaceae (42), and Fabaceae (27). There were 96 annuals, four biennials, and 170 perennials. Sixty species (22.2%) were not native to the United States. No rare species currently being tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. Compared to floristic inventories for other sites of similar size in Oklahoma, Hafer Park has a relatively high number of species. However, it also has a relatively high percentage of exotic species from other continents, some of which are invasive and are threatening the native forest, grassland, and riparian plant communities. INTRODUCTION groups. For vascular plants, however, urban parks often have a large percentage of exotic Efforts to protect biodiversity often species, sometimes over 50% (Nielsen et al. focus on large natural habitats outside of 2013). highly urbanized locations, but efforts Palmer et al. (1995) summarized the should also be made to preserve and importance of floristic inventories in promote biodiversity in urban forests and providing data for research on biodiversity, other urban green spaces that have environmental impact assessment, and maintained relatively high levels of management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • September 16, 2009
    October 30, 2009 Ms. Jemellee Cruz VIA EMAIL AND OVERNITE EXPRESS Flood Maintenance Division [email protected] Department of Public Works County of Los Angeles 900 South Fremont Ave Annex Building, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Subject: Results of Focused Plant Surveys for the Los Angeles River Soft-Bottom Channel, Los Angeles County, California Dear Ms. Cruz: This letter report presents the findings of focused plant surveys conducted for the Los Angeles River Soft-Bottom Channel (SBC), in Los Angeles County, California. Surveys were conducted for southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis), a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) List 1B species with potential to occur because of the presence of suitable habitat. Los Angeles River SBC is located in the City of Long Beach, and is surrounded mainly by residential, commercial, and industrial development (Exhibits 1 and 2). This SBC reach starts at State Highway 1/Pacific Coast Highway, flows south parallel to and east of Interstate 710, and ends at Ocean Boulevard. The survey area is located on the Long Beach U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle map, with an elevation below approximately ten feet above mean sea level (msl). METHODS Prior to the field survey, a literature review was conducted to identify special status plants known from the general vicinity. This included a review of Inglewood, South Gate, Whittier, Torrance, Long Beach, Los Alamitos, San Pedro, and Seal Beach USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles in the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) California Natural Diversity Database (CDFG 2009) and the CNPS Inventory (CNPS 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, a Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California
    Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, A Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed In Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California By Jennifer Buck-Diaz and Julie M. Evens California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 In cooperation with Arlee Montalvo Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD) 4500 Glenwood Drive, Bldg. A Riverside, CA 92501 September 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Standards .......................................................................................................... 1 Table 1. Classification of Vegetation: Example Hierarchy .................................................... 2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................3 Field Sampling ..........................................................................................................................3 Figure 1. Study area map illustrating new alluvial scrub surveys.......................................... 4 Figure 2. Study area map of both new and compiled alluvial scrub surveys. ....................... 5 Table 2. Environmental Variables ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]