Cartea Albastra
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Report [PDF
This Annual Report can also be accessed at website: www.meaindia.nic.in Front Cover: Illustration of Central Secretariat buildings from water colour painting by Shri Kashi Nath Das Designed and produced by: CYBERART INFORMATIONS PVT. LTD. Kanu Chambers, 3rd Floor, C-2, Sanwal Nagar, New Delhi 110 049, INDIA Telefax: 26256148/26250700 E mail:[email protected] Contents Introduction 1 Highlights of the Year 2 Synopsis 4 1. Indias Neighbours n Thailand 43 n Morocco 59 n Afghanistan 11 PMs Visit and Agreement for 44 n Palestine 59 n Bangladesh 12 Bilateral FTA n Sudan 60 n Bhutan 14 n Timor Leste 45 n Syria 60 Military Operation in Bhutan 14 n Vietnam 45 n Tunisia 60 by Royal Bhutanese Army China 15 n 3. East Asia 6. Africa (South of Sahara) PMs visit to China, 15 n Japan 46 n Angola 61 22-27 June 2003 n Republic of Korea (ROK) 47 n Botswana 61 n Hongkong 22 n Democratic Peoples Republic 49 n Namibia 61 n Iran 22 of Korea (DPRK) n Zambia 61 President Khatamis Visit and 22 n Mongolia 49 n Mozambique 62 The New Delhi Declaration n Swaziland 62 n Maldives 24 4. Central Asia n South Africa 62 n Myanmar 24 n Azerbaijan 50 n Lesotho 65 n Nepal 27 n Kazakhstan 50 n Zimbabwe 65 Maoist Insurgency in Nepal 27 n Kyrghyzstan 50 n Ethiopia 65 n Pakistan 28 n Tajikistan 51 n Madagascar 65 PMs Initiative at 28 n Turkey 51 n Tanzania 65 Srinagar, 18 April 2003 n Turkmenistan 52 n Zanzibar 66 Indian proposals to Pakistan: 28 n Uzbekistan 52 n Uganda 66 22 October 2003 n Rwanda 66 Ceasefire along the 30 5. -
Post-Communist Romania
Political Science • Eastern Europe Carey Edited by Henry F. Carey Foreword by Norman Manea “Henry Carey’s collection captures with great precision the complex, contradic- tory reality of contemporary Romania. Bringing together Romanian, West European, and American authors from fields as diverse as anthropology, politi- Romania cal science, economics, law, print and broadcast journalism, social work, and lit- ROMANIA SINCE 1989 erature, the volume covers vast ground, but with striking detail and scholarship and a common core approach. Romania since 1989 provides perhaps the most comprehensive view of the continuing, murky, contested reality that is Romania today and is a must read for any scholar of modern Romania, of East-Central Europe, and of the uncertain, troubled, post-socialist era.” since 1989 —David A. Kideckel, Central Connecticut State University Sorin Antohi “The wealth of detail and quality of insights will make this an excellent source- Wally Bacon book for students of political change after the Cold War. It should be taken seri- Gabriel Ba˘ descu ously by policy practitioners increasingly involved with Romania’s problems.” Zoltan Barany —Tom Gallagher, Professor of Peace Studies, Bradford University, U.K. Politics, Jóhanna Kristín Birnir Larry S. Bush Those who study Romania must confront the theoretical challenges posed by a Economics, Pavel Câmpeanu country that is undergoing a profound transformation from a repressive totali- Henry F. Carey tarian regime to a hazy and as yet unrealized democratic government. The most and Society Daniel Da˘ ianu comprehensive survey of Romanian politics and society ever published abroad, Dennis Deletant this volume represents an effort to collect and analyze data on the complex prob- Christopher Eisterhold lems of Romania’s past and its transition into an uncertain future. -
Official Directory of the European Union
ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND -
Defining the Complementary Institution of Conditional Release in Romania (2000-2019) Costea, Vladimir Adrian
www.ssoar.info (Re)defining the complementary institution of Conditional release in Romania (2000-2019) Costea, Vladimir Adrian Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Costea, V. A. (2020). (Re)defining the complementary institution of Conditional release in Romania (2000-2019). Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 20(1), 55-86. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-68465-6 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de (Re)defining the complementary institution of Conditional release in Romania (2000-2019) VLADIMIR-ADRIAN COSTEA* (University of Bucharest) Abstract This article aims to investigate the legal and political evolution of the institution of Conditional release in Romania between 2000 and 2019 with a special focus on the abrupt changes during the mentioned period. The aim of this research consists in bringing together the redefining of the regulatory framework of Conditional release in relation to the dynamic political context and personal strategies used by the right-holder of individual liberation. Two important episodes -
EU Grant Agreement Number: 290529
This project is co-funded by the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development of the European Union EU Grant Agreement number: 290529 Project acronym: ANTICORRP Project title: Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Work Package: WP8 Corruption, assistance and development Title of deliverable: D8.1.5 Romanian public procurement in the construction sector. Corruption risks and particularistic links Due date of deliverable: 28 February 2015 Actual submission date: 30 March 2015 Editor: Alina Mungiu-Pippidi Authors: Mădălina Doroftei, Valentina Dimulescu Romanian Academic Society Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) only and do not reflect any collective opinion of the ANTICORRP consortium, nor do they reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. Romanian public procurement in the construction sector. Corruption risks and particularistic links ABSTRACT Improving infrastructure in Romania has been a significant project in the past 25 years. Unfortunately, although large amounts of public funds were spent in the construction sector from 2007 to 2013 (an average of 6.6% of GDP), the physical results in terms of project quality and completion do not match this investment. -
DECIZIA Nr.375 Din 6 Iulie 2005
DECIZIA Nr.375 din 6 iulie 2005 referitoare la sesizările de neconstituţionalitate a Legii privind reforma în domeniile proprietăţii şi justiţiei, precum şi unele măsuri adiacente Publicată în Monitorul Oficial nr.591 din 08.07.2005 Curtea Constituţională a fost sesizată, în temeiul dispoziţiilor art.146 lit.a) din Constituţia României şi ale art.15 din Legea nr.47/1992 pentru organizarea şi funcţionarea Curţii Constituţionale, cu privire la neconstituţionalitatea Legii privind reforma în domeniile proprietăţii şi justiţiei, precum şi unele măsuri adiacente, de către un grup de 101 deputaţi şi 39 senatori, după cum urmează: - deputaţi: Viorel Hrebenciuc, Dan Ioan Popescu, Valeriu Ştefan Zgonea, Bogdan Nicolae Niculescu-Duvăz, Constantin Niţă, Constantin Amarie, Petru Andea, Ecaterina Andronescu, Mihai Cristian Apostolache, Nicolae Bădălău, George Băeşu, Nicolae Bănicioiu, Eugen Bejinariu, Dumitru Bentu, Ioan Bivolaru, Răzvan-Petrică Bobeanu, Ovidiu Brânzan, Ioan Buda, Cătălin Ovidiu Buhăianu Obuf, Romeo Gheorghe Leonard Cazan, Ion Călin, Gheorghe Chiper, Filonaş Chiş, Ioan Cindrea, Titus Corlăţean, Gabriela Creţu, Vasile Emilian Cutean, Iosif Dan, Marin Diaconescu, Corneliu Ioan Dida, Vaier Dorneanu, Doina Micşunica Dreţcanu, Cristian Sorin Dumitrescu, Zamfir Dumitrescu, Mihai Dumitru, Ion Dumitru, Mircea Dusa, Monalisa Gălăteanu, Filip Georgescu, Ion Giurescu, Aurel Gubandru, Iulian Iancu, Florin Iordache, Costică Macaleţi, Iulian Claudiu Manda, Eduard-Stelian Martin, Cătălin Lucian Matei, Alexandru Mazăre, Vladimir Alexandru Mănăstireanu, -
Instabilite Du Personnel Gouvernemental Et Continuite Decisionnelle En Roumanie Postcommuniste Ionașcu, Alexandra
www.ssoar.info Instabilite du personnel gouvernemental et continuite decisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste Ionașcu, Alexandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Ionașcu, A. (2006). Instabilite du personnel gouvernemental et continuite decisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 6(2), 319-356. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-56152-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de Instabilité du personnel gouvernemental 319 Instabilité du personnel gouvernemental et continuité décisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste ALEXANDRA IONAŞCU Pour les pays de l’Europe Centrale et de l’Est l’année 1989 marque la fin du communisme et l’écroulement des régimes de «démocratie populaire». Ce change- ment de régime nous pouvons le retrouver avec sa spécificité dans le cas roumain. Comme Daniel Barbu l’observait, la théorie du vide du pouvoir qui a succédé aux événements de 1989 a permis à l’ancienne classe dominante de s’instituer non pas comme une partie dans la négociation, mais comme un arbitre de celle-ci. Pour cette raison on ne pourrait pas parler d’un changement au niveau des élites, mais seulement d’une reconfiguration institutionnelle, car au fond «le macro-change- ment politique a été accompagné par une micro-continuité individuelle»1. -
10 Romania R01848
Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 11 Tab Number: 10 Document Title: IFES Pre-election Technical Assessment Project Romania Document Date: 1995 Document Country: Romania lFES ID: R01848 ~ ~I //:/ES Internatianal Faundatia~ far Electian Systems ~ 110115th STREET, N.w., THIRD flOOR, WASHINGTON, D.C 20005 • (202) 82&8507 • fAX (202) 452.Q804 I I IFES PRE-ELECTION TECHNICAL AsSESSMENT PROJECT I ROMANIA I SEPTEMBER 8 - 28, 1995 I I I I I I I Charles Lasham Paul DeGregorio I This project was made possible by a grant from U.S. Agency for International Development. This material is in the public domain and may by reproduced without permission, however citation I of this source is welcomed and appreciated. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and I not necessarily that of US AID and the U.S. Gove=ent. I BOARD OF DIREOORS Barbara Boggs Peter G. Kelly William R. Sweeney, Jr. DIREOORS EMERITI Charles T. Manatt Patricia Hutar Dame Eugenia Charles Maureen A. Kindel leon J. Weil James M. Cannon I Chairman Secretary (Dominica) Jean-Pierre Kingsley Randal C. Teague Richard M. Scammon David R. Jones Joseph Napolitan Judy G. Fernald (Canada) Counsel Vice Chairman Treasurer Victor Kamber Peter McPherson Richard W. Soudriette I President I I I Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 3 I I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. , .......................... 5 a. Scope of the Project ................................................................ 5 b. Country Background ............................................................... 5 c. The Electoral System. .. 7 I I. National. .. 7 2. Local .................................................................... 8 I 3. Time Line ............. : .................................................. 9 II. IFES TEAM'S ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ........... : .................................... 10 a. Training ofLncal Election Commission Members ...................................... -
5Th QUARTERLY REPORT
United States Agency for International Development Contract IQC NO.LAGI-00-98-00006-00 Task Order No. 814 5thQUARTERLY REPORT 5 October 1 -December 31,2001 NEXANT, Inc. A Bechtel -Affiliated Company Gas Restructuring and Regulatory Assistance in Romania 5" Quarterly Report - Oct./Dec. 2001 5thQUARTERLY REPORT October 1 -December 3 1,2001 CONTENTS I. Background 11. Summary of Project Activities During the Reporting Period 111. Future Activities IV. In-Country Staff Activities During the Reporting Period V. Deliverables During the Reporting Period VI. Budget Activity Appendix A: Schedule of Events & Deliverables Appendix B: COPPresentation on Focus Areas & Selection of Project Team Members Appendix C: Project Team Appendix D: Review of Legislative and Market Changes Gas Restructuring and Regulatory Assistance in Romania 5" Quarterly Report - Oct./Dec. 2001 1. Background The objective of USAID's Gas Regulatory and Restructuring Assistance Project in Romania (hereinafter referred to as "The Project") is to provide technical assistance to the Romanian Ministry of Industry and Resources ("MoIR"), formerly Ministry of Industry and Trade ("MoIT"), the Romanian National Gas Regulatory Authority ("ANRGN"), and the gas sector companies that, prior to Romanian Governmental Decision No. 334 of April 2000, were part of the Romanian National Gas Company, ROMGAZ SA'. The Project supports USAID's Strategic Objective 1.5: "A more economically sustainable and environmentally sound energy sector." Assistance under The Project is provided in two areas: 1) -
Privatizare La Petrom?
JOI, 13 FEBRUARIE 2003 ANUL V / NR. 1.059 12 PAGINI PRE}: 10.000 lei Privatizare la Petrom? Sta]i www.zf.ro ABONEAZ~-TE NOU! INSTANT mai \ntåi s` ne concentr`m Acum v` pute]i abona pe loc la Ziarul Financiar pe o lun` de zile! Ministerul Industriilor vrea s` strång` \ntr-o singur` mån` ce a mai r`mas Trimite]i un SMS \n re]eaua Orange cu textul „ZF“ la 6666 [i \n cel mai scurt timp ve]i fi contactat de din petrochimia romåneasc` departamentul abonamente al ZIARULUI FINANCIAR pentru a vi se cere adresa pe care dori]i s` primi]i Lumea abonamentul. Vi se va da totodat` o parol` [i un Dup` aproape 12 ani de nume de user pe baza c`rora ve]i putea accesa integral site-ul www.zf.ro. laude la adresa Puzzle de Stat arat` mai Valoarea abonamentului - 4 USD + TVA - beneficiilor aduse va fi inclus` \n factura de telefon din luna respectiv`. economiei de afacerile Ministerul Industriilor are o idee: s` fac` un bine Dac` trimite]i SMS-ul private mici [i mijlocii, colos, cu vånz`ri de 700 milioane de dolari pån` la data de 25 a anual, din diviziile petrochimice a trei fiec`rei luni ve]i primi statul romån se uita companii. printr-un abonamentul \ncepånd cu data oftånd \n urm`, de \ntåi a lunii |ns`: - una nu-i apar]ine (Petromidia), display urm`toare. \ncercånd s` reg`seasc` - una este \nglodat` \n datorii (Oltchim), Pentru informa]ii suplimentare sinergiile [i avantajele - alta este \n plin proces de privatizare color pute]i suna la 202.18.42 concentr`rilor (SNP Petrom). -
Page 1 F R E E X R E P O R T M E D I a F R E E D O M
FREEX REPORT M E D I A FREEDOM I N R O M A N I A 2012 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - Bucharest 2013 This report has been drawn up as part of the FreeEx program of ActiveWatch – Media Monitoring Agency. The FreeEx program's aim is to contribute to the protection and promotion of freedom of speech and media freedom. The program was launched in 1999. ActiveWatch publishes annual reports regarding the status of media freedom in Romania. This report is financed by the Open Society Institute (OSI). The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the OSI. The english translation of the report is a shortened version of the Romanian language report Authors: Liana Ganea, Maria Popa, Răzvan Martin, Sorina Vasile, Laura Ștefănuț, Ștefan Mako, Victor Ilie, Vlad Ursulean, Radu Ciorniciuc, Ana-Maria Telbis, Cosmin Dumbravă, Ovidiu Vanghele Many thanks for the assistance provided to the FreeEx department during the entire year, by: Mircea Toma, Dan Mihai, Ștefan Cândea, Bogdan Manolea Diana Hatneanu, Nicoleta Popescu Many thanks to: The Romanian Center for Investigative Journalism, the "Journalist's House", the European Human Rights Association, the Romanian Association of Technology and Internet, the Center for Independent Journalism, APADOR-CH Layout and design: Alexandra Cândea Dan Ichimescu English translation: Irina Isaia Donor: O p e n S o c i e t y I n s t i t u t e © ActiveWatch Member of the Reporters without Borders Network 98 Calea Plevnei, building 10C, 1st district, Bucharest; P.O. Box 2 Post Office 67 021 313 40 47 021 637 37 67 [email protected] www.activewatch.ro IBAN Account: RO 83 BTRL 0450 1205 A793 02XX Transilvania Bank Știrbei Vodă Branch C.I.F. -
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).