DOCSLIB.ORG

NATIONAL ACTION PLAN for Conservation of Wetlands of High Significance in Bulgaria 2013 – 2022

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NATIONAL ACTION PLAN for Conservation of Wetlands of High Significance in Bulgaria 2013 – 2022 “LIFE FOR THE BURGAS LAKES” PROJECT (LIFE08/NAT/BG/000277) implemented by the Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds with the financial support of LIFE+ Program of the European Union NATIONAL ACTION PLAN for Conservation of Wetlands of High Significance in Bulgaria 2013 – 2022 МИНИСТЕРСТВО НА ОКОЛНАТА СРЕДА И ВОДИТЕ Authors: Ventzislav Vassilev – team leader, author of the general parts of the plan Rossen Vassilev – coordinator, author of the wetland characteristics Dr. Petar Yankov – avifauna Dr. Nevena Kamburova, Research Associate – avifauna Dr. Yordan Uzunov, Senior Research Associate – hydrobiology, invertebrate fauna Dr. Lachezar Pehlivanov, Senior Research Associate – fish fauna Prof. Dr. Boiko Georgiev – mammals Dr. Georgi Popgeorgiev – herpetofauna, GIS and maps Boris Assyov – flora and vegetation Stefan Avramov – coordinator protected areas and species Radostina Tzenova – coordinator of stakeholder work, editor Yurii Kornilev – editor of the Bulgarian and English version of the Plan Sofia, 2013 Publication of Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation Design and print by C print Ltd., Burgas ISBN: 978-954-9959-63-5 © R. Tzenova Acknowledgments The authors express their gratitude to the experts, government institution representatives and other stakeholders who have provided information, comments and recommendations during the preparation of the plan. We acknowledge the contribution of the MOEW representatives and, mainly, Mrs. Aylin Hasan (the National Coordinator for the Ramsar Convention) for editing the Bulgarian and English versions of the plan, for information and photos provided, and for taking an active part in the meetings and discussions related to this plan. We value very highly the contribution of Lyubomir Profirov and of senior scientific collaborator Dr. Tanyo Michev, who, being the main authors of the first national plan (1995), became involved in this update by making recommendations and by providing information. We are grateful to Stoycho Stoychev (Conservation Director, BSPB) and to Stefan Avramov (Protected areas and species, BBF) for their comments and improvements to the plan. We acknowledge the contribution of the Royal Society for the protection of Birds (RSPB) team and the Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention for their support for the plan’s finalization. We are grateful to Ventzislav Gradinarov and Peter Todorov from BBF for the translation of the document to English. 4 National Action Plan for Conservation of Wetlands of High Significance in Bulgaria 2013 – 2022 Contents 1. Summary 7 2. Introduction 9 2.1. Grounds for the Plan .................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Development Process of the Plan ................................................................................ 9 2.3. Intent and Features of the Plan ..................................................................................... 10 2.4. Goals and Tasks of the Plan ......................................................................................... 11 3. Legal and Institutional Framework 12 3.1. Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1. International Conventions and European Union Regulations ....................................... 12 3.1.2. National Legislation ................................................................................................. 13 3.1.3 Strategic and program documents ............................................................................. 13 3.2. Institutional Framework Roles and Responsibilities of the Institutions ........................... 14 4. Social and Economic Aspects 15 4.1 Social Aspects ............................................................................................................. 15 4.2 Economic Aspects ....................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Economic Benefits and Ecosystem Services ................................................................. 18 5. General Status of Wetlands in Bulgaria 22 5.1 General Status and Trends for Bulgaria’s Wetlands ........................................................ 22 5.2 Review of the Implementation of the Previous Plan – at the national level ...................... 23 6. Characteristics of Bulgaria’s Most Significant Wetlands 27 6.1 Ramsar Sites ............................................................................................................... 27 Srebarna ..................................................................................................................... 28 Ropotamo Complex ..................................................................................................... 31 Atanasovsko Lake ........................................................................................................ 34 Durankulak Lake ......................................................................................................... 37 Shabla Lake ............................................................................................................... 40 Belene Islands Complex ............................................................................................. 43 Ibisha Island ............................................................................................................... 46 Poda ........................................................................................................................... 48 Pomorie Wetland Complex .......................................................................................... 51 Vaya Lake (Burgas Lake) ............................................................................................. 54 Dragoman Marsh Karst Complex ................................................................................... 57 National Action Plan for Conservation of Wetlands of High Significance in Bulgaria 2013 – 2022 5 6.2 Potential Ramsar Sites and Other Wetlands with National Importance ........................... 61 Mandra Dam / Mandra Lake ............................................................................................ 62 Ovcharitsa Dam .............................................................................................................. 63 Pyasachnik Dam ............................................................................................................. 64 The Glava Panega wetlands ............................................................................................. 66 Rozov Kladenets Reservoir .............................................................................................. 67 Maritsa - Zlato pole ........................................................................................................ 68 Choklyovo blato ............................................................................................................. 69 Chengene Skele ............................................................................................................. 70 Island near Upper Tsibar ................................................................................................. 71 Orsoya Fisheries ............................................................................................................. 72 Vardim Island ................................................................................................................. 73 The Mechka Fisheries ..................................................................................................... 74 Kalimok .......................................................................................................................... 75 Pozharevo Island ............................................................................................................ 76 Garvan marsh ................................................................................................................. 78 Kaliakra - Tyulenovo coastline ......................................................................................... 79 Baltata ............................................................................................................................ 80 Kamchia Complex .......................................................................................................... 82 Varnensko-Beloslavsko Lake Complex ............................................................................. 83 Malko Sharkovo Water Reservoir ..................................................................................... 85 Straldzha Marsh .............................................................................................................. 86 Veleka - Silistar ............................................................................................................... 87 The Seven Rila Lakes ...................................................................................................... 88 Hadzhi Dimitrovo fisheries .............................................................................................. 89 Zvanichevo fisheries ....................................................................................................... 90 7. Priorities and measures 92 7.1 Priorities for conservation, maintenance and restoration of wetlands in Bulgaria .................................................................................... 92 7.2 Horizontal measures for protection and wise use of wetlands ............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park
    Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park October 2006 Abbreviations AF Agricultural Fund BAS Bulgarian Academy of Science BD Basin Directorate BDA Biodiversity Act (Bulgaria) BGN Bulgarian Leva BSPB Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds CBD Convention on Conservation of Biological Diversity CC Consultative Council CHH Cultural Historical Heritage CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CMS Conservation Management System CoM Council of Ministers dka Decares (1,000m2) EA Environmental assessment EAFA Executive Agency for Fishing and Aquaculture EEA Environmental Executive Agency EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMEPA Enterprise for management of environmental protection activities ESE Ecologically sustainable enterprise EU European Union EUNIS European Nature Information System FF Forestry Fund FMS Forest management section GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System ha Hectare IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources km Kilometre l Litre LAG Local Action Group m Metre m/s Metres per second m2 Square metre m3 Cubic metre MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MDC Main drainage canal MoEW Ministry of Environment and Waters MoF Ministry of Finance MP Management Plan MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MWH Montgomery Watson Hauser m/s Metres per second NFB National Forestry Board NGO Non Governmental Organisation NIMH National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology NP Nature
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Paounovsky
    THE B ULGARIAN POLICY TTHE BB ULGARIAN PP OLICY ON THE BB ALKAN CCOUNTRIESAND NN ATIONAL MM INORITIES,, 1878-19121878-1912 Vladimir Paounovsky 1.IN THE NAME OF THE NATIONAL IDEAL The period in the history of the Balkan nations known as the “Eastern Crisis of 1875-1879” determined the international political development in the region during the period between the end of 19th century and the end of World War I (1918). That period was both a time of the consolidation of and opposition to Balkan nationalism with the aim of realizing, to a greater or lesser degree, separate national doctrines and ideals. Forced to maneuver in the labyrinth of contradictory interests of the Great Powers on the Balkan Peninsula, the battles among the Balkan countries for superiority of one over the others, led them either to Pyrrhic victories or defeats. This was particularly evident during the 1912-1913 Balkan Wars (The Balkan War and The Interallied War) and World War I, which was ignited by a spark from the Balkans. The San Stefano Peace Treaty of 3 March, 1878 put an end to the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). According to the treaty, an independent Bulgarian state was to be founded within the ethnographic borders defined during the Istanbul Conference of December 1876; that is, within the framework of the Bulgarian Exarchate. According to the treaty the only loss for Bulgaria was the ceding of North Dobroujda to Romania as compensa- tion for the return of Bessarabia to Russia. The Congress of Berlin (June 1878), however, re-consid- ered the Peace Treaty and replaced it with a new one in which San Stefano Bulgaria was parceled out; its greater part was put under Ottoman control again while Serbia was given the regions around Pirot and Vranya as a compensation for the occupation of Novi Pazar sancak (administrative district) by Austro-Hun- - 331 - VLADIMIR P AOUNOVSKY gary.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdwatching Tour
    PIRT “Via Pontica” Birdwatching Tour PROMOTING INNOVATIVE RURAL TOURISM IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN REGION 2014 Table of Contents Birdwatching Sites .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenia ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bulgaria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Turkey ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Technical Requirements, Issues and Solutions ............................................................................................................................................................ 70 Detailed Itinerary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Page 1 of 14
    2005 Country Report on Human Rights in Bulgaria Page 1 of 14 Facing the Threat Posed by Iranian Regime | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Bulgaria Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Bulgaria is a parliamentary democracy of approximately 7.7 million persons, and is ruled by a coalition government headed by Prime Minister Sergei Stanishev. Multiparty parliamentary elections in June were deemed generally free and fair despite some reported irregularities. While civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of law enforcement officers, there were some instances in which law enforcement officers acted independently of government authority. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in several areas. The following human rights problems were reported: police abuses, including beatings and mistreatment, of criminal suspects, prison inmates, and members of minorities harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities arbitrary arrest and detention impunity limitations on freedom of the press some restrictions on freedom of religion discrimination against certain religious minorities widespread corruption in executive and judicial branches violence and discrimination against women, children, and minority groups, particularly the Roma trafficking in persons discrimination against persons with disabilities child labor RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life Neither the government nor its agents committed any politically motivated killings; however, there were reports that police killed two persons during the year. On November 10, Anguel Dimitrov died while being arrested in a nationwide operation against organized crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Report 2020
    MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD ANDAND THE THEFORESTRY FORESTRY ANNUALANNUAL REPORT REPORT MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD AND THEAND FORESTRY THE FORESTRY ON THEON STATETHE STATE AND AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF OF AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE20202020 2020AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL REPORT REPORT 2020 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2020 AGRICULTURAL REPORT) AGRICULTURALСъдържание REPORT 2020 Списък на използваните съкращения 7 РАЗДЕЛ А 11 I. СЪСТОЯНИЕ И РАЗВИТИЕTable of НАContents НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА. М Abbreviation list 6 SECTION A 13 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. PLACE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 13 II. AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN 2019 AND FORECASTS FOR 2020 19 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 19 1.1. Use of agricultural land 19 1.2. Use of agricultural parcels 20 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 20 1.3. Registration of farmers 21 1.4.State Land Fund participation in land relations in Bulgaria 22 1.4.1. Providing SLF Own Terrains for Rent or Lease 22 1.4.2. Distribution of pastures, grasslands and meadows, part of a state or municipal land fund, in accordance with the procedure of Article 37 and the ALOUA 22 1.4.3. Establishment of limited rights in rem over SLF lands 23 1.5. Activities and Contracts for Reinstated Ownership Map and Registers Maintenance 23 1.6. Land Relations 23 1.6.1. Consolidation of Agricultural Land 24 1.7. Agricultural Land Protection Activities 24 2. Economic and Production Results in 2019 and forecast data for 2020 25 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of Tipulidae (Diptera) to the Fauna of Bulgaria
    ZooNotes 90: 1-3 (2016) …90… www.zoonotes.bio.uni-plovdiv.bg ISSN 1313-9916 Newly registered tracks of Raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) indicate the presence of resident population in the region of Bolata dere (NE Bulgaria) NIKOLAY NATCHEV Department of Integrative Zoology, Vienna University, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Faculty of Natural Science, Shumen University, Universitetska 115, 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria Abstract. The Raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834) is an invasive species which was first recorded for the Bulgarian fauna in 1968. To date, data concerning the distribution of the species in Bulgaria are rather scarce and often provided by non specialists (mostly local fishermen and hunters). The present note includes information concerning the presence of Raccoon dogs in the region of Bolata dere (NE Bulgaria). Faeces and footprints were found in the springs of 2014 and 2015. Apparently, the predators are resident inhabitants of the site, so that particular population could be used for field surveys on the biology of the Raccoon dogs in Bulgaria. Key words: Bulgarian fauna, zoology, monitoring, Canidae, invasive species, predator Introduction The Raccoon dogs belong to an aberrant branch in the evolution of the canids, which had its phylogenetically split from the other dogs about 10 million years ago, or even earlier (see Wayne 1993). One of the Raccoon dog species - Nyctereutes procyonoides (native to the Far East), was artificially introduced to the western regions of the Soviet Union in the thirtieth year of the nineteenth century (for overview see Koneva & Durnev 2012). According to these authors, the populations of the Raccoon dog had increased dramatically in short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Current State and Risk Vulnerability of Transport Networks and Related Infrastructural Systems in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coastal Region
    h Current State and Risk Vulnerability of Transport Networks and Related Infrastructural Systems in the Bulgarian Black Sea Coastal Region Common borders. Common solutions. Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin 2014-2020 www.blacksea-cbc.net Table of Contents Purpose and Methodology of Study ................................................................................................ 4 Current State of Transport Networks .............................................................................................. 6 Qualitative Description of TRIS .................................................................................................... 9 Critical Infrastructure in the Coastal Region........................................................................... 17 Overall Transport System Vulnerability ..................................................................................... 19 Regional Quantitative Data ........................................................................................................ 25 TRIS Characteristics of Varna District .................................................................................... 26 TRIS Characteristics of Burgas District .................................................................................. 37 Traits and Considerations Valid for Both North and South Black Sea Coast ........................... 54 Critical Event Impacts on Regional TRIS ...................................................................................... 57 Major Types of Risks
    [Show full text]
  • National Report Bulgaria
    NATIONAL REPORT BULGARIA AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS (The Hague, 1995) Implementation during the period 2006 and 2008 Contracting Party: BULGARIA Designated AEWA Administrative Authority: Ministry of Environment and Water Full name of the institution: Name and title of the head of the institution: Dzhevdet Chakarov - Minister Mailing address: 22, Maria Luisa Blvd Telephone: (+ 359 2) 988 25 77 Fax: (+ 359 2) 986 25 33 Email: [email protected] Name and title (if different) of the designated contact officer for AEWA matters: Valeri Georgiev Mailing address (if different) for the designated contact officer: 22, Maria Luisa Blvd Telephone: (+ 359 2) 940 6151 Fax: (+ 359 2) 940 6127 Email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1. Overview of Action Plan implementation 5 2. Species conservation 6 Legal measures 6 Single Species Action Plans 8 Emergency measures 8 Re-establishments 8 Introductions 8 3. Habitat conservation 8 Habitat inventories 8 Conservation of areas 9 Rehabilitation and restoration 10 4. Management of human activities 11 Hunting 13 Eco-tourism 14 Other human activities 14 5. Research and monitoring 15 Status of research and monitoring programmes for species 15 6. Education and information 16 Training and development programmes 16 Raising public awareness 16 7. Final comments 17 8. Progress to implement Resolutions and Recommendations of the Meeting of the Parties 17 9. OPTIONAL SECTION – Planned and future actions 17 List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the
    [Show full text]
  • BOURGAS LAST.Pmd
    WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF THE MONTHLY WATERBIRD MONITORING 1996 - 2002 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov 1 WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS 2 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF THE MONTHLY WATERBIRD MONITORING 1996 - 2002 Drawings Assen Ignatov Cover design Ivan Yanchev Editor of English Translation Vladimir Pomakov PENSOFT PUBLISHERS BULGARIAN BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION BOURGAS WETLANDS PUBLICATION SERIES No 6 2005 3 WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS Results and Evaluation of the Monthly Waterbird Monitoring 1996 - 2002 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov We dedicate this book to Alexandur Prostov (1926 – 2000), born in Bourgas, who was one of the first to draw the attention of the Bulgarian public to the exceptional richness and diversity of the wildlife and especially the birds of Bourgas Lakes First published 2005 Pensoft Publishers ISBN 954-642-236-3 Pensoft Series Faunistica No 44 ISSN 1312-0174 Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation ISBN 954-9959-33-3 This book was published with the financial support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation We recommend this book to be cited in the following way: Dimitrov, M., T. Michev, L. Profirov, K. Nyagolov. 2005. Waterbirds of Bourgas Wetlands. Results and Evaluation of the Monthly Waterbird Monitoring 1996-2002. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation and Pensoft Publishers, Sofia–Moscow, 160 pp. On the back cover: Sattelite photo of the region of Bourgas Bay (Original Data © ESA; 1992; Distributed by Eurimage) © PENSOFT Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Scale Distribution of Geese in Relation to Key Landscape Elements in Coastal Dobrudzha, Bulgaria
    Fine-scale distribution of geese in relation to key landscape elements in coastal Dobrudzha, Bulgaria Preliminary report Anne Harrison & Dr Geoff Hilton May 2014 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire GL2 7BT UK T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 E [email protected] Registered charity in England & Wales, number 1030884, and Scotland, number SC039410 This publication should be cited as: Harrison, AL, & GM Hilton. 2014. Fine-scale distribution of geese in relation to key landscape elements in coastal Dobrudzha, Bulgaria. Preliminary report, WWT Slimbridge, 28 pp. Email [email protected] This study was funded by the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community under the ‘Safe Ground for Red-breasts’ project LIFE09/NAT/BG/000230. 2 Table of Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 Aims ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Study area ................................................................................................................................... 6 Materials and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 Dropping density as response variable ................................................................................
    [Show full text]