Frances Mary Wilson Historical Commentary on Plutarch's Life of Brutus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
w:i:t FRANCES MARY WILSON HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ON PLUTARCH'S LIFE OF BRUTUS ProQuest Number: 10107222 All rights reserved INF0RMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10107222 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 The commentary attempts to ?ain a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the events and personalities included in the Life of B-utus or forming part of the historical background of the biography. Since Plutarch is biographer and moralist first and only then an historian, his narrative is checked and complemented from a comparison of other sources, in order to out].ine Brutus' part in the final struggle of the Roman Republic. Rome modern questions and discussions on points raised by this survey are included also. Plutarch's portrayal of Brutus - since, again, be is prepared to sacrifice strict accuracy to his general moral purpose - is briefly considered in relation to other evidence, especially the contemporary evidence of Cicero, which affords a comparison and modifies the idealistic presentation of Plutarch's Life. 1 . c . 1- The ancestors of Brutus. Cicero: ^rutus 97, 521. Tusc. IV 1, 2. ^hii, % 6, 15. II 11, 26. IV 5, 7, X r. 14. Orat. II 55, 224 - 56, 22^. Att.'xiII 40, 1. XVI 5. Appian; II 1 1 2 , 469. Dio 44, 12, 1-5. 45, 45, 4. Nicolaus: (Vita Caes.) 19. 26. Livy: I 56-60. II 1-6. IV 14 f. Dioysirs of Halicarnassus IV 6" ff. V 18. VI 70, 1. Valerius Maximus: IT a. o, %v 1. v 5, T. 8, 1. VI 4. Ext. ll VII 5, 2. VIII 14, 6. 2. IX 1, 5 Rilius Italiens: Punica VII 642-660. VIII 607 f. IX 415. Pauly - Wissawa X 961 ff. Suppl. V 255 ff. Grueber - CRRBM I pp. 477-480, Sydenham: Roman Republican Coinage p. 150. The Life begins conventionally rith some account of Brutus' family. This chapter deals with the two most famous of the reputed ancestors of Brutus: Lucius Junius Brutus, in popular belief the expeller of the kings and first consul, and Rervilius Ahala who assassinated Spurius Maelius in 429 B.C., on suspicion of aiming at monarch (see Dion. Hal. IV 67 f., Livy I 56 - II 6. IV 14 f.). The association of the Servilian and Junian families with these early Liberators was general in antiquity. According to Plutarch (l, 6); no-nne doubted Brutus' descent from Ahala through his mother Servilia, but objections ^^ere raised especially by enemies to his claim to be a descendant of the first consul; and v.ûth reason. Even if f. B?mtus is an historical figure, there is no possibility that the later Junii Bruti were connected with him. His line was believed to have died out with the two sons whom he executed (Dion. Hal. V 18. Val. Max. V 7, 1), Posidonius, who defended the claim (1, 7); seems to have originated the theory that L. Brutus had a third son. There is no trace of his existence in traditional accounts of the early Republic. The family apparently disregarded the chief objection to their claim - that the first consul must have been a patrician, while the historical Junii are plebeians (Dion, Hal, V 18). Accounts of them before the fourth century are unreliable. They did not attain nobility until the consul ship was throv.n open to the Plebeians. Thereafter they are found holding the chief offices of the Republic (see Livy VIII 12, 12. 29, 2. IX 21, 1. 28, 2. - cf. Val. ItAx. II 9, 2. VÏIT 14, 6. IX 1, 2. Livpr Per. 16. 8il. It. VII 607 f. IX 415); for their plebeian origin see TJ.vy 24, 45, 2 - the tribune of 195 B.C. The origin of the connection with the first consul is imknown., but was well-established by the mid-second century when the poet Accius produced his nraetexta "Brutus" in honour of his patron, Dec. Junius Brutus Callaicus, cos. 128 B.C. (see Gic. Brnt, 28, 107. de leg. Il 54. nro Arch. 27. l'^arro de C.L. 5, 80). Dionysius (VI 70, 1) invents an '::'arly plebeian L. Junius Wiio tried to assume to cognomen Brut"''s and ■'uno is later numbered among the first tribunes (cf. Plut. Coriol. 7, 1^. He is almost certainly a fictitious counte:rart of the first consul (see X 968). Schur (T^'^ Suppl. V 266 -8) reaches the conclusion that L. Brutus himself is a figure of legend. He is not the sole example of a patrician, famous in the traditions of the early Republic, who is represented in later times only by a plebeian family bearing the same name (note the Cassii, Bemnronii, Volumnii, etc.). Possibly, ennobled plebeians fabricated patrician ancestors for themselves "vithout troubling to reconcile the discrepancy. However it developed, the connection was commonly accented in the time of Marcus Brutus, Cicero frequently referred to it (e.g. Brut. 97, 221. Tusc. IV 12. Att. XIII 40, 1. Phil. I 6, 13. IV 3, 7. X 6, 14), stressing the association of Brutus' name and family with liberation from tyranny. In 44 B.C. it was fully exploited by Republicans in order to prepare the ground for,and after^ popularize^the assassi- nation of Caesar (see below 9, 6 f.). To accomplish it under the name of Brutus was all but a guarantee of good faith. In the struggle following Caesar's death, Cicero helped to propagate this view (see Phil. IV 3, 7. I 6, 13). In the Tenth Philinnic he urged it, to overcome the apprehension of certain senators concerning Brutus' intentions in occuuyln? Macedonia (X 6, 14). In the same way, Brutus, hoping to win the people with his Games in July 44, intended to revive the "Brutus" of Accius (Att. XVI 5). Brutus himself clearly believed (or -ished to believe) in his descent and took pride in it. 'Imagines' of L. Brutus and Ahala were to be seen in his house among his ancestors (Phil, II 11, 26), and he induced Atticus to draw up his genealogy, tracing his line back to the two heroes (wepos Att. IB, 2. Cic. Att. XIII 40, 1). His natural interest was increased by his sympathy with the strong Republican views of his supposed ancestors. At the beginning of his career he turned to this tradition and as triumvir monetalis GO/59 B.C. issued coins bearing portraits of his ancestors and "Libertas" (see Grueber I pp. 478-80. Sydenham p. 150). in addition to the family pride displayed here, there ma^ have been some intention of advertising his political stand on entering public life. At that time, too, when the first triumvirate was forming, the reminder of former champions of liberty was significant. Brutus v/as not alone in recalling them. Vettius tried to implicate Cicero in his "plot" (see below"' oy quoting a remark of his; "Ahalam Rervilium aliquem aut Brutum opus esse reperiri" (Att. II 24, 2), 5 . Later writers, aware of Brutus' keen interest in his family history, believed it was one of the chief motives for his part in the conspiracy against Caesar (Dio 44, 12-12. App. II 112, 469). In this connection, L. Brutus was more important to him than the Bervilian line. Ahala is never mentioned escept in conjunction with Brutus. It is significant, too, that Brutus continued to be known by his father's name after his adoption and even in his official title the name of Brutus was retained (see Phil. X 11, 25-26. Dio 41, 63, 6). And this, although in the first century B.C. the Servilii were more prominent than the Junii Bruti, who in the preceding generation had produced several lawyers and minor Populares, no important figures (see Cic. Brut. 47, 175. 34, 130. de Orat. II 55-56. Livy Per. 88. App. I 60, 271). Apart from distant Junian ancestors, the Servilii played a greater part in Brutus' life. After his father's early death in 77 B.C., he was drawn closer to his mother's family and eventually adopted by his maternal p-3/- uncle (see belowÿ. The personal influence of his Mother, Servilia, may be seen in this. From Cicero's letters it is clear that she was always active in his affairs, both public and private (see Att, XIII 16, 17, 22. XV 11. ad Brut. I 18). 2, 1. More important was the influence of her half-brother, Cato (cf. Cato Min. 1, 1). His attachment to her (see Asconius in Rcaur. 17 "apud Catonem maternam obtinebat auctoritatem".; and the death of the elder Brutus porhans first led him to take particular interest in his nephew. Plutarch introduces Cato here, "here some account of Brutus' father might have been expected. (Tihe latter is not mentioned until c. land then very briefly). He notes Brutus' admiration for his uncle and his imitation of him. Certainly his political and philosophic views display the effect of his association from youth with the uncompromising Republican and Stoic - though he was never, like Favonius, a blind imitator.