PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 - we the our one of Special neighbor within which http://pos.sissa.it/ simulator in hannels ents solar v treatment olution. c e v e the Carlo ae 2 , v systems 1 o orbital complete within Monte a binary superno Licence. the e our stars of Ib Mediterrània) of of la cía–Berr olution, type ormation de v f binary e to Gar of formation [email protected] , application stellar the the leading to implementation for Científiques Enrique ution-NonCommercial-ShareAlik of population full Attrib a and the leading scenarios models as preliminary obades 2 , r a of 1 T the Commons e v well As of as Creati updated orres (XXIII processes arf. T the [email protected] ulations study 104 simulator of , dw on Castelldefels, most go Catalonia xus terms de episodes, the of Catalunya the Carlo Ne sim white darkness s/n . placed w a Aplicada, de statistical under Santia the is used a Spain Edif , erflo e in 1 been Superior Monte Studies v v Spain o a author(s) Olímpic Física ha ho Spain 2–4, has the e Carlo de lights olitècnica by 2007 lobe . ca, Space W members P performed celona, Canal present wned e for 3-5 olitècnica o [email protected] vae: Capità the v e P Camac sitat Castelldefels, Bar del Menor Galaxy ha emphasis hood. W of Roche SNeIb an yright Gr Cop udit vda. c J Monte of Departament Escola October Mao, Univer c/ A Superno 08860 Institute 08034 E-mail: 1 2 PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 e 9. x- of v . for for are e dy- ob- and and rate 0 only ha been been done a wise, mod- ] white stellar e . e e ≤ system infinite L and a v and v whereas ζ e [10 has radiation Lik ha masses ha which < probability ≤ require current e although require 0 reliably eccentricities — ad binary y W formation — circularization Ref. ζ The place, ], ariables simulator virtually be of separations ydrostatic v ]. for selection a of ]. es accreted defined: The h is man containing braking [11 star account. [3 e vitational wton [2 uniform 2 ]. tak be when only the to gra such [5 an problems = account into mass orbital considered. Ref. ) which can can random Ref. of that e , en of progenitors systems ( ance of into adiabatic of f 18 v function magnetic not of ution study vides ws components transfer XMM-Ne and tak decreasing prescription 10 ], urst Including rele the pro and results b the [6 & addition, will follo binary and were mass interesting is the been xponents taking distrib mass tracks fraction of of e In It e ad with to v generator ζ formalism the which ution losses one a ha other winds ] which initial systems. importance binary is period [1 the Chandra thermal xponentially amma-ray — eral donor ad eq each e itself, g preliminary , donor e a distrib donor donor v gest assumed. the L R R olutionary progenitors, response. probability Finally M ageing stellar of v se R M M lik an ad a according binary problems, ln ln lar e as the . radiation mass–radius wing of , v ζ ln 2 ln ln ln lobe d d standard w LISA eq d study and d d d ζ < arf a the simulator repetition , generator follo stellar L Also, to thermal a population wing ad of = = = Gyr dw and ζ ysical atories stellar through . ζ arithmic a is olution L is superno Roche
ad eq < describe v ζ using modelled > Carlo ζ ζ vitational ingredients e to log follo enation M the Ia 11.5 eq L binary the a aim number we white ζ Additionally ζ LIGO observ gra to ensures of astroph 20 the ype to of treatment been rejuv studies T — stellar Monte e fits and orbital age Here w main of v when y of than obtained when ) . Mass-losses double 1 the both Galactic random ha studies. according an , the ]. xpression: erflo a 0 episodes disk e or 9 kind less ( v of the F a and , were response o formalism wn binaries interesting whose simulator , 8 according thermal-equilibrium al space-borne occurs of the , ensues, used radius analytical dra of the elope simulator star — [7 the these to this wn the e episodes v and v synthesis populations masses only interv in the X-ray is en w computed Finally dra Carlo lobe ha e ithin eq ingredient Carlo Swift the ariety transfer v ζ v erflo we W neutron simulations. simulations components ha v or stellar study biases a randomly o olution represents acoording Galactic and Roche performed adopted basic v terrestrial mass to Monte we — the common L e oduction adopted. Monte within population wide e e the , ζ and Carlo the v arded. v a e also randonmly of as g The The A v purpose synchronization ational ha ha first w oted practical The Intr arf v ] disre the we been considered during [4 and were each using dw 2. sources de we nuclear density for Finally elling serv that response tensi Monte 1. where planned modelled namical PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 - C is er the un- this v w com- . period of Ne closely periods 4% erflo before the episode), v ∼ significant been o it of whereas panel wing accretor are orbital has did top the follo systems 8% function fects with period, the a and ef and ∼ binary synchronized. as ] In Roche–lobe mass–transfer the 8 the , binary and A tidal and 1. of donor fers [7 systems of B) the suf case the these (a Figure binary (case Of eccentricities seen, function both in which a of of be circularized 1 phase , wn interactions as those , are approximation can ignition sho utions system donor tidal , accretor As , generated. He are onization KH 3 by t KH distrib which sequence timescales t particular binary en were ution. v population y In before synchr eccentricities results main panel) an dri orbits min weak–friction of = the and The lobe distrib binary f with systems ]. (bottom ution final up [12 treatment during population. elvin-Helmholtz Roche parameters final Galactic K the binary w end its circularized. our distrib and 4 and the ] the cularization 10 erflo binary wn [9 of and days v orbital with equilibrium–tide, cir × o initial 0 the displays panel) . of 10 erflo 9 v that of Refs. account model o the ∼ (top statistics of w panel about olution: standard of into the simulations w system. 25% stress v olution sho e v es Initial e synchronized the Roche–lobe we binaries panel than erflo total 1: we tak Carlo in idal binary e esting The A T Ov treatment roughly T 10% the which Figur Monte of 3.1 3. figure puted the shorter bottom for theless, instantly 3.2 ∼ derwent PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 a a a = or ed the the F and also first of by mass 25% 9%), those . phase plus which binary ge donor 4 of ∼ remain- the systems ) or , obtained M arf ∼ F panel, bottom ( He–nak mer of 2% the the whether star by to we dw system. as ∼ ger in of fraction right ( systems will on composed sequence top up parameters onset phase. mer the arf the white a 61% binary end 13% ant episode In from those the main dw v sequence He and ∼ . ∼ whereas w system giant to a , of ery depends At a rele cases v characterized sho y that e ratio donor the white star main of end is of binaries form a we of wn. the He respect 89%) the mass set destin rest the a found sho 5% of and ∼ at ith during panel ( of is mass–transfer binary ∼ is the components, full and W arf it sequence final A ge mass in left the ed the dw 50% the –accretor obtained. cases the parameters the system mer the then of case ∼ main olv cores. of v a In a while are episodes the and ely remaining ger white donor He ZAMS) giant of lik and orbital a He–e the the He 4 mer episode, a the detached is a subgiant radius olution system. system with the star a v a most the and ) most e obtained, population underwent as is of ed is arf in is ge since 1% donor donor . es binary will dw system, 0 v time mass–transfer a separation, mer ) star olution binary the the Myr cases ∼ donor v which of ( containing 3 e He–nak olution the If 4% survi v mass–transfer white a the episode, 10 the rate, ed 45% e 2 ferent ∼ orbital B ( systems × If of ∼ olv dif . , 8 Galactic olution the . v ed sequence v binaries time 5 systems binary e system. binary case transfer star the star the 85% Figure these ' a the the , t of the He–e ∼ ( main containing in those period, er a of go a in He–nak v mass giant binary ws mass–transfer binary or double a y mass–transfer the during F cases or of we as a plus and the wn. sequence C under binary star follo Ho episode plus C). the xample ed of a sho e destin lifes . star simulations form purposes, of ed case bottom, olv main system are An ed e v code a a which subgiant to (case v form example olv final 1% their 2: v donor olution olv Carlo is 15% go v sequence e v ∼ top Our e the An up He–e plus ∼ the them He–e Figur Monte time from only end of that under ing donor ignition transfered systems He–e main mass–transfer star and of 3.3 a particular illustrati PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 , a a e a II in
of are ger W and in of M non– non– giant place some phase lar main– orbital a type 77 a helium , Hence, seen e . details. . star generate 0 er (HG) sequence to through by the v and tak the population de has ger urning for = system. elope highly b
es formation we v of xt proceeds the Gap is the M acc clearly mer main te en finished olv Ho of 3 a M the in v a xplosion. as donor binary e , e rate binary identical See to progenitor to
episodes has end nuclear composed a the than the M the transfer with w function the in of if the star , 84 of a common occurs. . ignition leads system nearly arf er 0 transfer Herztsprung erflo periods. At leading v as Mass star v system timescale, , the before He = o smaller the 2. a . that we the if phases episode helium mass subdw origin in stars Ho analysis episode orbital occur ed donor The and a elope form before the the an v M thermal the Figure the olv as masses e accretor to sequence en v urning will a channel v core. lobe of e of b elope has of es ed days. helium v ha the when be occurs from the en Subgiants ant olv main to with of 58 main and v phase . v w at a panel H–rich stars ed e and 0 mass–transfer not Roche ed v observ ae. function a e, v rele the v = a v erflo its consequence, 5 be plus es elope happens v deri right will a as orb masses v o the donor ecti belie SNIb common P ws episodes helium w olv v be collapse population en detached primary the As code, star of v o star may all progenitors. or stars the superno are in is f 2. of con and tw erflo that erflo can fers , The v our He v Ib second ae
o . o of binary v ution second R suf both plot of helium that binary a common outer The Helium The type Figure 60 through a found of system . possible a scenario star giant 3 of e ). binary its the of distrib v e
channels case result the the superno = v Galactic bottom ha M xception days. results form gone The ards, a phase e the and Ib e 2 all ysical , the . to panel produce this 59 the Roche–lobe masses . W
w > xpelled massi the of 0 donor to for in e of in M ype star sequence a left M sho T = ae. Afterw ( already 74 the v ely multiple phase wn . . has ormation astroph ain ignition with the e f orb 0 second preliminary ution a we ae. v P lik of main v v sho a of Ag the which core = 3 a He ha systems the as elope are The in of as and simulations sequence acc v He superno e primary main–sequence plot Distrib
the
v phase M with en probable ae, stars R M as 3: , one superno timescale of superno v ati the Figure before the 5 e
urning. Carlo main . 49 Ib . b Ib 1 of start M In As a 3 studied, most middle Results: these generate 13 = Figur ype . xplode periods core of than e occurs Monte companion. type 4. de common sequence 1 we the nuclear a superno core conserv and T during the thus PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 2 y is in Ib es bi- ed. are the the can and act, that olu- ents. the f rate, yr early main v v study that ysical olv Union e e 5) Monte the e ed, helium type . In v smaller and sources v detailed to 2 deserv channels ae in 100 of and of total which v olv found primary our o > v tidal is ant in seen, besides, in what tw astroph ery massi the w the orb orbits, v estimate also the a P e be frequencies used European e to e are superno e we channels. e v otal and, of presented the some ws v W v triangles other T 0.4% guaranteed Ib simulator (log 10.3% can e ha the formation ute which subgiant populations v of ha systems of star e occur a ents e red by are in As follo ha other The cases the relati v W type v interesting to we e GB Carlo to to gion we A the one ap. contrib the periods binary than re composed g C ents. using which stars. of other v lead a SNIb and the of e actory respecti progenitors. systems in progenitor y correctly long 0.1% 7.3% to xpected early Monte is SNIb Case — e blue where one of e occur a the that GB v GB , system ae that an which of 1, satisf as plotted their v to A synchronization conducting are all ha occup EA of or become model of and cases are kinds using ely for able Hertzsprung to and C were ents T binary early also star half lik our A05-08013-C03-01, v systems a e superno simulations the Y particular ely in y and Both A displayed are in formation tests and scenarios in lik that In . binaries the B, giant more 6 account of progenitors 0.1% 1.6% is obtained binary modelling are progenitor these SNIb a ed the our Carlo star ery arf A, ed. grant of o progenitors v are of of can population B GB GB y still dw tw olv that are v check produced circularization results EA which although correct summarized either MEC in e Monte en (GB) Case progenitors . channels v v a neutron probabilities binary in while white — by yr e are a stars erage, ha frequenc Gi are progenitors our v v formation e a progenitors giant companion three He the lobe frequencies 100 W 0.2% 1.4% and branch periods. progenitor those e including e GB) the on . of of v double v progenitors Galactic xtend results the ery preliminary that arf e therefore, HG episodes respecti system. progenitors, v for systems of (EA supported e the giant that that, Roche to dw the relati orbital massi final subgiant results as of Galaxy namely w and, seen, its their found w binaries, of giant ] the the plan subgiant binary e less binary twice ut our be transfer The erflo v white found Branch channel 15 with a b of ork fills . xpected for , is a e squares, ha of e we SNIb, Ov w v population range can e 14 from st presented assess and mass of , 1 SNIb ha stars are are which W typical Giant simulations e this to the e As simulated v which a Galaxy green in occurs [13 future star wide He and of W probable ae. is ha Summary ents probable, v a wledgments olving attention. the as for v w e Carlo v code art e 1: probability e population near W P of same whole most LISA wn Conclusions found. formation a depth erflo subgiant able v xhibit periods. 5. the e results Carlo the stars nary o be superno sho Asymptotic SNIb tion T Monte of their a sequence the although equally problems for in In components further Ackno PoS(SUPERNOVA)008 , Conf. 627 , & 2005, J.A., ASP Dwarfs 356 .J., P , T J.A., Lobo, White well, (Cambridge: & in Lobo, MNRAS Ho J., ade, & D. W Maccarone, J., 1995, 2005, ., Isern, and T ., A., R.A. E., P , ert, and Bulik, Guerrero, Gilmore 19 Burk A., G. 543 & A.G., Pringle , Ed.: R., García–Berro, erlag), Zezas, , 315 Lorén–Aguilar J.E. V , & D., 753 vitch, R.E., , Eds.: o J.A., 7 , 329 Pedemonte, , MNRAS 356 Function” Springer aam, , J., 60 population T , g: Lobo, Mochk 2000, J., Mass .A., binaries” Isern, M., F García–Senz, binary MNRAS ., 729 P , C.A., , Isern, 2040 Commun. Initial 368 453 (Heidelber , A.G., acting 223 39 , , 173 Rasio, J., 2005, , , out, 112 UR. 66 ., Hernanz, T 383 , , V 268 . Galactic 22S , Phys. 174 , erner , & GA “Inter Stellar 126 . , E., 57 220 Ser C.A., , W Press), A the , , . av in ApJ MNRAS 99 of K. Gr , ApJS Guerrero, out, O.R., the “The Pedemonte, Lorén–Aguilar T Conf A&A A&A & ., Comput. ersity Kalogera, P in 1985, v by 1983, & E., E., , 1975, A&A ., Pols, ., 2008, K., Uni .P G., Phys. 1977, 1989, oester and 1990, P R.F 201 1988, Quantum N., ., ., García–Berro, K , of ., D.C., J.R., 1981, simulations F . & J., a, , J.P J.P J J., ., D. y v 142 P funds ., ggie, ebbing, ano ences Carlo Ser Eds.: Class. Iv Cambridge 2007, Isern, Nelemans, He Hurle James, Scalo, Zahn, Zahn, Hut, Eggleton, García–Berro, W García–Berro, Belczynski, Lorén–Aguilar [4] [5] [6] [2] [1] [3] [7] [8] [9] Monte FEDER Refer [10] [15] [11] [14] [12] [13]