Arxiv:1703.10181V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 29 Mar 2017 Ordo H G.W Alteesas“E Stragglers” “Red Stars These Call We Similar Found RGB
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version October 15, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 01/23/15 ON THE ORIGIN OF SUB-SUBGIANT STARS II: BINARY MASS TRANSFER, ENVELOPE STRIPPING, AND MAGNETIC ACTIVITY Emily Leiner1, Robert D. Mathieu1, and Aaron M. Geller2,3 Draft version October 15, 2018 ABSTRACT Sub-subgiant stars (SSGs) lie to the red of the main-sequence and fainter than the red giant branch in cluster color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs), a region not easily populated by standard stellar evo- lution pathways. While there has been speculation on what mechanisms may create these unusual stars, no well-developed theory exists to explain their origins. Here we discuss three hypotheses of SSG formation: (1) mass transfer in a binary system, (2) stripping of a subgiant’s envelope, perhaps during a dynamical encounter, and (3) reduced luminosity due to magnetic fields that lower convective efficiency and produce large star spots. Using the stellar evolution code MESA, we develop evolu- tionary tracks for each of these hypotheses, and compare the expected stellar and orbital properties of these models with six known SSGs in the two open clusters M67 and NGC 6791. All three of these mechanisms can create stars or binary systems in the SSG CMD domain. We also calculate the frequency with which each of these mechanisms may create SSG systems, and find that the magnetic field hypothesis is expected to create SSGs with the highest frequency in open clusters. Mass transfer and envelope stripping have lower expected formation frequencies, but may nevertheless create occa- sional SSGs in open clusters. They may also be important mechanisms to create SSGs in higher mass globular clusters. 1. INTRODUCTION rather than sub-subgiants, though the two types may be Optical color-magnitude diagrams reveal that 25% of related and have similar formation mechanisms. Geller the evolved stars in older open clusters do not fall along et al. 2017a give a census of the open cluster and globular standard single-star evolutionary tracks. These stars in- cluster red stragglers and SSGs known from the litera- clude the well-known blue stragglers, but also the yellow ture. giants and sub-subgiants. No well-developed theory has yet been presented for Sub-subgiant stars (SSGs) were first identified in the the origin and evolutionary status of these non-standard color-magnitude diagram (CMD) of the open cluster M67 stars. Mathieu et al. (2003) suggest they may be prod- (Belloni, Verbunt & Mathieu 1998; Mathieu et al. 2003). ucts of close stellar encounters involving binaries, or stars These two SSGs fall to the red of both the main-sequence with enhanced extinction (i.e. due to the presence of cir- and main-sequence binary track and well below the sub- cumstellar material). Other authors invoke mass transfer giant branch. Both SSGs have high membership proba- and stellar collision events to form SSGs (Hurley et al. bilities based on both proper-motion and radial-velocity 2005; Albrow et al. 2001). (RV) data, leaving a negligible probability that both are While many SSGs are kinematic cluster members, most field interlopers. do not have binary orbital information (Geller et al. Broadly speaking, the populations of SSGs in globu- 2017a). The sample of SSGs with both high quality lar and open clusters share similar characteristics. They 3D kinematic memberships and known orbital solutions fall to the red of the main sequence and below the sub- for the binaries is small, consisting of 6 stars in two giant and giant branch on optical CMDs, a region that open clusters in the WIYN Open Cluster Study (WOCS; can not be easily populated by either single-star evo- Mathieu 2000): 4 SSGs (3 binaries and one single star) arXiv:1703.10181v1 [astro-ph.SR] 29 Mar 2017 lutionary theory or by any combination of two normal in NGC 6791 (Platais et al. 2011; Milliman et al. 2016) cluster stars. They are also typically X-ray sources with and 2 binaries in M67 (Mathieu et al. 2003). We use this 30 31 −1 sample to guide the formation of an origin theory that Lx ∼ 10 − 10 erg s and photometric variables with periods between 1 and 20 days. Where binary status is matches the observed properties of this sample. We focus known, they are often found to be close binary systems on three hypotheses for SSG formation: mass transfer in with orbital periods on the order of 1-10 days. Similar a binary system, stripping of a subgiant’s envelope, or a X-ray sources and photometric variables are also found reduced luminosity due to the presence of a strong mag- to red of the RGB. We call these stars “red stragglers” netic field. 2. SUB-SUBGIANT SAMPLE AND OBSERVATIONS [email protected] 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin- 2.1. M67 and NGC 6791 Cluster Properties Madison, 475 North Charter St, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2 Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in As- Our sample of six SSGs is drawn from two WOCS open trophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics and Astronomy, clusters: M67 and NGC 6791. CMDs for both clusters Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd, Evanston, IL 60208, are shown in Figure 1 with the locations of the SSGs USA 3 highlighted. Adler Planetarium, Department of Astronomy, 1300 S. Lake ′ ′′ Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605 Located at α = 8h51m23s.3, δ = +11◦49 02 2 Leiner et al. Figure 1. (left) A BV color-magnitude diagram of M67 showing all 3D kinematic members (Geller, Latham & Mathieu 2015). The sub-subgiants are shown with red circles. (right) A VI CMD showing proper-motion members of NGC 6791 (Platais et al. 2011). The SSGs confirmed to be 3D kinematic members of NGC 6791 are shown in red circles (Milliman et al. 2016). The binary SSGs in both plots are circled in black. (J2000), M67 is an old, solar-metallicity open clus- sis for the M67 SSGs, calculating a 9% probability that ter (e.g. Montgomery, Marschall & Janes 1993; Taylor one of the 246 3D kinematic members in their sample is a 2007). Distance measurements for the cluster nonmember. The probability of finding 2 nonmembers is range from 800-900 pc, with reddening measure- just 0.4%. This is within their entire sample of kinematic ments ranging from E(B − V ) = 0.015 to 0.056 members, so the likelihood that the 2 SSGs specifically (Geller, Latham & Mathieu 2015). For this study, are field stars is smaller still. we adopt E(B − V ) = .041 (Taylor 2007) and Milliman et al. (2016) provide a similar analysis of the (m − M)0 = 9.7 (Sarajedini, Dotter & Kirkpatrick NGC 6791 SSGs. Their analysis, based on the kinematic 2009). Age determinations put the cluster at around membership probabilities and the CMD location of the 4 Gyr (e.g. Montgomery, Marschall & Janes 1993; stars, indicates that it is highly unlikely for all four stars van den Berg et al. 2004) with a main-sequence-turnoff to be field contaminants. Specifically, they calculate a mass of ∼ 1.3 M⊙. 17% probability that one of the four SSGs is a field star, ′ ′′ Located at α = 19h20m58s.09, δ = +37◦46 31 dropping to just 1.8% chance that two SSGs are field (J2000), NGC 6791 is an old (8 Gyr; stars, 0.13% for 3, and 0.007 % for all 4. We are thus Carney, Lee & Dodson 2005; Grundahl et al. 2008) confident that our sample of 6 SSGs cannot be explained and metal-rich ([Fe/H]=+0.40, Carney, Lee & Dodson simply by field contamination. 2005) open cluster. Distance measurements put the 2.3. SSG Spectral Energy Distributions cluster at around 4 kpc (e.g. Grundahl et al. 2008). The In order to measure the physical characteris- turn-off mass of the cluster is ∼ 1.1 M⊙ (Brogaard et al. tics of the open cluster SSGs, we pieced together 2012). For this study we use the distance modulus spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from existing and reddening values found by Carney, Lee & Dodson optical observations (Montgomery, Marschall & Janes (2005): E(B − V )=0.14, (m − M) = 13.07. 0 1993; Stetson, Bruntt & Grundahl 2003) and photom- 2.2. SSG Cluster Memberships and Orbital Parameters etry from the Two-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006), Wide Field Infrared Explorer In Table 1 we list the WOCS ID, coordinates, proper- (WISE; Wright et al. 2010), and Spitzer Space Tele- motion membership probabilities (Pµ), and the radial- scope Infrared Array Camera (Skrutskie, Cutri & Marsh velocity membership probabilities (PRV ) for the six SSGs 2007). We used these SEDs to fit a temperature and in our sample. We also include the BV I photometry radius to each star and determine the bolometric lumi- from Stetson, Bruntt & Grundahl (2003) for NGC 6791, nosities of the systems. and Montgomery, Marschall & Janes (1993) for M67. In 2.3.1. the comments section we include other identifiers for SED Fitting these targets from previous studies. We performed a χ2-minimization between the ob- Five of the six SSGs in our sample are binary systems, served photometry and a grid of Castelli-Kurucz models and for these we also list periods and eccentricities in (Castelli & Kurucz 2004) convolved with filter transmis- Table 1. One SSG is a double-lined spectroscopic binary sion functions. We fit only Teff (K) and R (R⊙) while (SB2; WOCS 15028), and the other four are single-lined fixing the distance and reddening to cluster values. Al- (SB1s). All but one of these binaries are circular, and tering the distance does significantly affect the values of they all have short periods ranging from 2.8 to 18.4 days.