DOCSLIB.ORG

English Place-Name Elements Relating to Boundaries Jepson, Boel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
English Place-Name Elements Relating to Boundaries Jepson, Boel English Place-Name Elements Relating to Boundaries Jepson, Boel 2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Jepson, B. (2011). English Place-Name Elements Relating to Boundaries. Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 English Place-Name Elements Relating to Boundaries Boel Jepson Centre for Languages and Literature Lund University 2011 1 Printed by Media-Tryck, Lund 2011 ISBN 978-91-7473-165-1 © 2011 Boel Jepson 2 In Memory of my Parents 3 4 Acknowledgements Now that my thesis is finished at last, I have many people to thank. The person who deserves it most is Docent Gillis Kristensson, my supervisor from the very beginning. He suggested that I should write about words meaning „boundary‟ in English place-names and set me going. He has helped me at all stages of my work, and it has been a real privilege to have had such a brilliant supervisor. His deep learning and great wisdom and the kind interest he has always shown me have meant more to me than words can express, and had he not been so encouraging and patient and understanding my thesis would never have been finished. Thank you, Gillis, with all my heart! The late Professor Olof Arngart had retired from his chair in English before I started to work on my thesis, but I have pleasant memories of him, and it has been inspiring to be a place-name student at the University where he made such important contributions to the knowledge of English place-names. I am also grateful to his successor, Professor Jan Svartvik, for the interest he has shown in my studies, and to the present holder of the chair, Carita Paradis, for all the help she has given me at the final stages of my work. Her support has really been most valuable. My thanks are further due to the late Dr Stig Carlsson, the late Dr Jan Jönsjö, Fil.mag, Anna Brita Adrian, Dr Örjan Svensson, Docent Björn Wallner, and the late Dr Nils Wrander, all of them members of Gillis Kristensson‟s name research group at the English Department, Lund University, for all good discussions and for their interest in my work. I have received a great deal of help from Mrs Margaret Greenwood Petersson, for which I am very grateful. The late Professor Bertil Ejder, Lund, kindly put his vast knowledge of Scandinavian place-names at my disposal and gave me valuable literature references. He also introduced me to Docent Gillian Fellows Jensen, Copenhagen, and from her, too, I have received useful hints on literature. I have also met Gillian Fellows Jensen as well as many other scholars at conferences in Britain arranged by the Council for Name Studies in Great Britain and Ireland (now the Society for Names Studies in Britain). These conferences 5 have been very stimulating, and I am truly grateful to all the scholars I have met there. I have paid many visits to Dialekt- och Ortnamnsarkivet i Lund (DAL) (the Department of Dialectology and Onomastics in Lund), and I have received a great deal of help and always felt myself welcome there. My thanks are also due to the many relatives and friends who have been interested and helpful. Several friends are library colleagues and library visitors. Moreover, I wish to thank the society of Råå Biblioteks Vänner (The Friends of Råå Library) for the very generous gift for my research work that I received when I retired. Mr Bengt Pettersson of the IT-department, Lund, Mr Jonas Palm with colleagues of Media-Tryck, Lund, and the staff of Dataporten, Hässleholm, have given me invaluable help with my computer problems. This book is justly dedicated to the memory of my parents, fil. lic. Reinhold Jepson and Mrs Märta Jepson. My father died before I had begun to work on my thesis, but he has set me an excellent example, and the thought of him has inspired me during all the years of this project. My mother followed with great interest my work until she died, and without her loving support this thesis would never have been written. Hässleholm, September, 2011. Boel Jepson 6 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 9 1.1 General background .................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Boundaries ......................................................................................................................9 1.1.2 When there were no maps ............................................................................................. 12 1.1.3 Boundary disputes ......................................................................................................... 13 1.1.4 How old are the boundaries? ......................................................................................... 15 1.2 Previous research .................................................................................................... 15 1.3 The present work ..................................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Aim and scope ............................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Sources .......................................................................................................................... 18 1.3.3 Method and material ..................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 2 OE (ge)mǣre .............................................................................. 23 2.1 Introductory remarks ............................................................................................... 23 2.2 Material ................................................................................................................... 24 2.2.1 GLOUCESTERSHIRE ................................................................................................. 24 2.2.2 THE WEST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE ....................................................................... 38 2.2.3 OTHER COUNTIES ..................................................................................................... 49 2.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 89 Chapter 3 OE mearc .................................................................................... 93 3.1 Introductory remarks ............................................................................................... 93 3.2 Material ................................................................................................................... 96 3.2.1 GLOUCESTERSHIRE ................................................................................................. 96 3.2.2 THE WEST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE ....................................................................... 99 3.2.3 OTHER COUNTIES ................................................................................................... 103 3.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 119 Chapter 4 OE *rān, *rǣn(e), ON rein ....................................................... 125 4.1 Introductory remarks ............................................................................................. 125 4.2 Material ................................................................................................................. 128 4.2.1 GLOUCESTERSHIRE ............................................................................................... 128 4.2.2 THE WEST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE ..................................................................... 129 4.2.3 OTHER COUNTIES ................................................................................................... 146 4.3 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 152 Chapter 5 ON rá ........................................................................................ 157 5.1 Introductory remarks ............................................................................................. 157 5.2 Material ................................................................................................................. 158 (5.2.1 GLOUCESTERSHIRE) ............................................................................................. 158 5.2.2 THE WEST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE ..................................................................... 158 5.2.3 OTHER COUNTIES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2016
    Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 December 2016 Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Harrogate context 3 3 Links with other council strategies and objectives 4 4 Local Plan update and the Local Development Scheme 5 5 Neighbourhood Planning 9 6 Duty to co-operate 10 7 Community Infrastructure Levy 11 8 Housing 12 9 Jobs and Business 24 10 Travel 31 11 Environment and Quality of Life 32 12 Communities 36 Appendices Appendix 1 Shop Vacancies 38 2 Harrogate Borough Council Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 The requirement to produce a Local Plan monitoring report is set out in the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended by the Localism Act 2011. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 provides more detail about what an authority should include in its annual monitoring report (AMR). 1.2 The AMR must be made available for inspection and put on the council's website. The Harrogate District Local Plan AMR 2016 covers the period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016, but also, where appropriate, includes details up to the time of publication. 1.3 This AMR contains details relating to: the progress made on documents included in the Local Development Scheme (LDS); progress with Neighbourhood Plans; co-operation with other local planning authorities; the community infrastructure levy; monitoring indicators; and the availability of a five year housing land supply. Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council 3 Harrogate context 2 2 Harrogate context 2.1 Harrogate district (see picture 2.1) is part of the county of North Yorkshire and local government service delivery is split between Harrogate Borough Council and North Yorkshire County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrogate Borough Council Planning Committee – Agenda Item 6: List of Plans
    HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE – AGENDA ITEM 6: LIST OF PLANS. DATE: 9 June 2015 PLAN: 04 CASE NUMBER: 15/01177/FUL GRID REF: EAST 428264 NORTH 465817 APPLICATION NO. 6.52.54.D.FUL DATE MADE VALID: 26.03.2015 TARGET DATE: 21.05.2015 REVISED TARGET: 12.06.2015 CASE OFFICER: Mrs Linda Drake WARD: Bishop Monkton VIEW PLANS AT: http://uniformonline.harrogate.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=NL5UNAHYFZG00 APPLICANT: Mr Ronnie Spragg AGENT: Mr Stephen Courcier PROPOSAL: Erection of replacement dwelling (site area 0.14 ha) LOCATION: Home Cottage Ingerthorpe Grange Markington North Yorkshire HG3 3PD REPORT SITE AND PROPOSAL Home Cottage is a detached dwelling sited to the south-west of Ingerthorpe Grange, Markington. The existing dwelling is a single storey bungalow, constructed from stone with a slate roof. To the side is a former barn, now used for storage. To the rear there is a garden at a raised level. Parking lies to the front. The site is in a secluded location and surrounded by trees. Planning permission was granted in 2012 for a replacement dwelling on the site, comprising a living room, study and kitchen on the ground floor with two bedrooms within the roofspace, of traditional design. The dwelling would be on same site as the existing dwelling. This permission is still extant. This scheme for a replacement dwelling is marginally larger in footprint to the approved scheme. The proposed dwelling also includes a full first floor with a taller height overall. The siting of the dwelling on the site remains the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    CHAPTER 1 HISTORY AND CONCEPT OF BOUNDARIES 1.1 INTRODUCTION The history and location of boundaries are steeped in the history of the world from prerecorded times to today. These boundaries are a result of actions and law. Boundar- ies can be related to the areas of history, politics, surveying, and law. Both boundaries of an international nature as well as between individuals have caused problems to have been fought, are being fought, and will be fought, in the future over the location of boundaries between nations, states, and individual parcels of land within “ Happy Acres ” subdivision. Wars have been fought on both an international basis and in local neighborhoods, and people have been killed over boundary disputes of an inconsequential nature that have ranged from hundreds of miles to a fraction of a foot or meter. Boundaries are personal in nature, and people have been and will continue to be protective over the misidentification or misalignment of a known or perceived boundary infringement. The surveyor may become the common denominator in a boundary problem, from preparing an erroneous map showing the boundary between two or more nations to the erroneous depictionCOPYRIGHTED of a single line between twoMATERIAL landowners. In the primeval forest, particularly in the plant kingdom, there are no known boundaries between living things. Although some horticulturists dispute the fact, we accept the fact that plants do not create boundaries to separate themselves. Animals — especially humans — create boundaries. Although we like to think that only humans create and appreciate boundaries, it has been recorded in nature that most mammals, some reptiles, and a few fish create, identify, mark, and defend boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Assessment Volume 9
    Built and Natural Environment Site Assessments Volume 9: Ingerthorpe – Kirkby Malzeard October 2016 Harrogate District Draft Local Plan: Site Assessments Harrogate Borough Council Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Policy Context 3 National Policy Context 3 Emerging Local Policy Context 5 3 Methodology 8 Landscape 8 Conservation and Design 13 Ecology 17 Land Drainage 20 4 Site Assessments 21 Ingerthorpe 23 Killinghall 26 Kirby Hill 103 Kirk Deighton 130 Kirk Hammerton 143 Kirkby Malzeard 181 2 Harrogate Borough Council Harrogate District Draft Local Plan: Site Assessments 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 The Harrogate District Local Plan will make allocations of land for housing, employment uses and a range of other uses where appropriate. The Built and Natural Environment Site Assessments document(s) has been prepared as part of the evidence base to support the Draft Local Plan and has been used to help inform the the choice of draft allocations for housing, employment and mixed use development.(1) This report looks at site options in: Ingerthorpe Killinghall Kirby Hill Kirk Deighton Kirk Hammerton Kirby Malzeard 1.2 Full details of how sites have been selected can be found in Appendices 7 and 8 of the Harrogate District Draft Sustainability Appraisal (October 2016).(2) 1.3 The council's consultancy team have undertaken studies of potential impacts of development on the following: Landscape; Conservation and design; Ecology; and Land Drainage 1 There are number of volumes of The Built and Natural Environment Site Assessment documents, each dealing with different settlements across the district. 2 For further details please visit www.harrogate.gov.uk/sa Harrogate District Draft Local Plan: Site Assessments Harrogate Borough Council 3 Policy Context 2 2 Policy Context National Policy Context Introduction 2.1 The government is committed to protecting and enhancing the quality of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrogate Landscape Character Assessment February 2004
    HARROGATE DISTRICT Landscape Character Assessment February 2004 T P Richards Dip T&RP, MRTPI, Head of Planning Services PLANNING DIVISION Department of Technical Services, Knapping Mount, West Grove Road, Harrogate HG1 2AE. www.harrogate.gov.uk/planning Contents Figures: 4 Harrogate District Land- scape Character Areas 23 1. Countryside Agency Character Areas in Harrogate District 7 4.1 Introduction 23 2 Harrogate District Soil Types 8 4.2 Historic Parks & Gardens 24 3 Harrogate District Topography 10 4.3 List of Character Areas 26 4 Harrogate District Landscape Character Areas 23 Appendices 1 Bibliography i Summary 2 2 Project for the review of the 1993 Landscape Appraisal for Harrogate District & Special 1 Introduction 3 Landscape Areas iii 3 Summary of the results of May 2 Overview of District 2003 meetings xiii Landscape Character 6 2.1 National & regional context 6 4 The biodiversity of Harrogate District xvii 2.2 Physical characteristics 6 5 The buildings of Harrogate 2.3 Human influences 11 District xxi 6 Soils in Harrogate District xxiii 3 Forces for Change and Generic Guidelines 13 Glossary xxv 3.1 Context 13 3.2 Built development 14 3.3 Infrastructure 16 3.4 Tourism, recreation & amenity 17 3.5 Quarrying & mineral extraction 19 3.6 Agriculture 20 3.7 Forestry & woodland 21 p. 1 Summary The Harrogate District Landscape Character Assessment provides a detailed breakdown of the District into 106 smaller Character Areas, each with their own distinct character and sense of place. These areas are described in detail with regard to geology, landform, drainage, land use, vegetation, wildlife, built form and communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitchforks and Perambulation: Borders, Violence, and Mapping in 17Th-Century New England
    Braccio 1 Pitchforks and Perambulation: Borders, Violence, and Mapping in 17th-Century New England Disputes over boundaries and deeds dominated the records colonists produced in New England between 1630 and 1700. When these disputes were particularly contentious, they became punctuated by rare and dramatic acts: mapping, violence, and indigenous testimony. These infrequent moments in generally mundane records reveal several important points, First, mapping, violence, and English reliance on indigenous knowledge were all powerful tools that colonists only employed out of desperation. The English population in the colonies was rapidly growing and land had become scarce. When they looked at a few acres of land, they saw farms for their children, future divisions of the town, and prosperity. It was this feeling of necessity and desperation that began a serious colonial engagement with mapping. Amongst the colonists, employed mapping far less frequently than violence and it should be understood as an extraordinary act. Second, the mundane land records concealed a greater project. By establishing written legal records, maps, memories of perambulation, and tales of violence over the landscape, colonists replaced the Algonquian spatial epistemology, that they had initially relied on, with an English way of understanding the landscape. Despite colonists’ project to silence them, indigenous people continuously occupied important roles in clashes over the land. For the first twenty-years of English occupation of the New England coastline, they had been utterly reliant on indigenous spatial knowledge. Mapping and land disputes were part of a process of replacing dependence on the indigenous with English knowledge and an anglicized landscape. Nothing could be more English than squabbling over the boundary between two Englishmen, ignoring any indigenous claim.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Dep 1980/1 Archives of the Dean and Chapter Of
    Handlist 47 LEEDS UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Archives of the Dean and Chapter of Ripon MS Dep 1980/1 The greater part of their accumulated archives was very generously deposited recently in the Brotherton Library of the University of Leeds by the Dean and Chapter of Ripon. It is hoped that by this arrangement the material will be more conveniently accessible to the majority of researchers. A few items, however, remain at Ripon because they are currently in use or are on permanent display to visitors. The cathedral was a parish church before it was raised to its present status and the parish registers are deposited at the North Yorkshire County Record Office, Northallerton. This list includes both the material remaining at Ripon and that at Northallerton. The archives of the Dean and Chapter have been listed twice before. A summary list was prepared for the Pilgrim Trust in 1946. A much fuller list was compiled for the National Register of Archives (Historical Manuscripts Commission) and issued in 1959. Upon the archives being inspected after their arrival at Leeds it was immediately apparent that the collection contained even more than had been listed in 1959, and it was decided with the ready concurrence of the Commission, that a new listing would be essential. This new list has been designed to avoid as much confusion as possible. It follows the style and numeration of the 1959 list and new entries have been inserted as close as possible to suitable places within its original framework. Some documents had identifications unrelated to the serial numbers used in that list; they have now been numbered to correspond and the additional items have been given appropriate subdivisions within the original notation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beating the Bounds: Property and Perambulation in Early New England
    Beating the Bounds: Property and Perambulation in Early New England Allegra di Bonaventura INTRODUCTION In 1654, lay historian Edward Johnson wrote of the colonial project in New England in flushed, sanguine terms: "Thus hath the Lord been pleased to turn one of the most hideous, boundless, and unknown wilder- nesses in the world in an instant, as 'twere, .[..] to a well-ordered com- monwealth."' Colonists who came from England in the seventeenth- century, arriving on New England's soil, cultivated an array of evolving aspirations from economic opportunity and political consensus to religious reform and even toleration. Their claims to any higher purpose, however, rested first and foremost on establishing a firm hold on the ground below. For colonists, imposing order on this "most hideous, boundless"2 land usually meant clearing trees, planting crops and constructing buildings, but it also required them to impose their thinking onto the earth, reworking and rewording the land from "wilderness" into a Western idea of "prop- erty."3 Ordinary New Englanders compelled this legal and symbolic transformation,4 not simply by writing it into statutes or deeds, pleading it before magistrates at court or even in idle musings over rum or a neighbor's fence. They enacted the change, scoring it deeply into trees and stumps, heaving it onto mounds of native stones and, of course, by stamping out its lines with the soles of their feet. During the period of the Protestant Reformation, Europeans' view of the * John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics at Yale Law School and Ph.D. candidate in History at Yale University.
    [Show full text]
  • 360 Years of Perambulation | New Hampshire Municipal Association 360 Years of Perambulation
    4/12/2020 360 Years of Perambulation | New Hampshire Municipal Association 360 Years of Perambulation By Christopher J. Porter What comes to mind when you hear the word perambulation? 1. Arcane, archaic state statutes? 2. Au-pairs pushing prams though Hyde Park? 3. Beating the bounds? 4. PERambulation? I thought it was PREambulation! 5. Selectmen tramping though the woods in search of "a certain large maple tree" mentioned in the town's charter that probably died back in 1783? 6. Pre-meditated amputation? If you said "some of the above" (numbers 1, 3 and 5) you are clearly a keen student of perambulation, the subject of which was the focus of a survey conducted this past summer by the New Hampshire Municipal Association (NHMA). Before diving into the study's findings, a bit of background on perambulation may be useful. By definition, according to Merriam-Webster, to perambulate is to: (1) travel over or through, especially on foot; or (2) make an official inspection of (a boundary) on foot. Although the etymology is Latin, the "modern" form and usage of perambulate dates to 1568. Perambulation was a colonial import, as described in the following piece on the custom's British traditions, "Selectmen on the Trail!" by James W. Baker, published at Jabez Corner: Years ago, one of the more practical festivals of the Christian Year was Rogation. A moveable holiday that occurred the Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday before Ascension Thursday, Rogation was when each town organized a procession to trace the parish or borough boundaries. Civic and religious leaders led a perambulation which stopped at each boundary marker where a prayer was given (in part to prevent evil spirits from spreading diseases and spoiling the harvest) before returning to the church for cakebread and ale.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin, Et Al
    No. 15-214 In the Supreme Court of the United States JOSEPH P. MURR, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. STATE OF WISCONSIN, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT STATE OF WISCONSIN BRAD D. SCHIMEL MISHA TSEYTLIN Attorney General Solicitor General Counsel of Record STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DANIEL P. LENNINGTON 17 West Main Street LUKE N. BERG Madison, WI 53703 Deputy Solicitors General [email protected] (608) 267-9323 Attorneys for the State of Wisconsin QUESTION PRESENTED Whether land lots that were created and defined under state law, which merged pursuant to a preex- isting state law merger provision, are a single “parcel” for regulatory takings purposes. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ......................................... i INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 STATEMENT ..............................................................2 A. Land Lots Are Creatures Of State Law ..........2 B. Lot Merger Is A Commonly-Used Tool For Phasing Out Substandard Lots .......................8 C. Factual Background ....................................... 13 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................... 23 ARGUMENT ............................................................. 27 I. As This Court Suggested In Lucas, The Relevant Land “Parcel” Should Be Defined By Objectively “Reasonable Expectations,” As “Shaped By The States’ Law Of Property” ......................................................... 27 II. Contiguous, Commonly Owned Land Lots Are One “Parcel” Under The Approach Suggested By Lucas Where—As Here—The Lots Are Merged Under State Law ................ 37 III. Even If This Court Decides That A Multifactor Analysis Is Warranted, The Lots Here Are Still One “Parcel” ................... 43 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 47 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Appolo Fuels, Inc. v. United States, 381 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2004) ........................... 44 Ariz. State Legislature v.
    [Show full text]
  • Cause Papers Project Standardization
    1 Cause Papers in the Diocesan Courts of the Archbishopric of York, 1300–1858 Editing and Standardisation in the Cause Papers Database The Cause Papers project provided an on-line searchable catalogue of more than 13,000 cause papers relating to cases heard between 1300 and 1858 in the Church Courts of the diocese of York, the original records for which are held at the Borthwick Institute for Archives at the University of York. The project aimed to pioneer a new standard of excellence in data accuracy and standardization. Cataloguing such a large and varied number of records posed numerous challenges in these areas, including the problem of how to incorporate spelling and language variations of surname and place names. The following document provides information on the methods used by the project team in compiling, editing and standardizing the data. It is split into the following sections:- 1) Information provided by the database 2) List of standard reference works used by the project team 3) List of types and sub-types of cases commonly used in the database 4) Standardization of Forenames 5) Standardization of Surnames – Part A 6) Standardization of Surnames – Part B 7) Problematic Place-names – Identification and Standardization Please note that this text is not intended as a guide to on-line catalogue. Users requiring assistance with searching the catalogue should consult the on-screen help text. 2 Editing and standardisation for the Cause Paper Database 1) Information provided by the database Owing to the volume and complexity of manuscript material involved, it was not possible to provide full transcriptions of the cause papers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feast of Corpus Christi in the West Country
    Early Theatre 6.1(2003) . The Feast of Corpus Christi in the West Country The feast of Corpus Christi, a late addition to the medieval calendar of festivals, was established in the thirteenth century as a response to the new eucharistic doctrine of transubstantiation. As Miri Rubin has shown in her rich study of the eucharist in late medieval culture, the energy for the establishment of the feast came, not from the hierarchy, but from the laity and the clergy who served them. It was the Beguines of Liege, inspired by the eucharistic visions of Juliana of Cornillon, who first sought to establish a special feast to honour the real presence of Christ in the sacrament.1 But the local bishop showed little interest in the feast and it was the Dominicans who spread the new celebration beyond Liege.2 It was not until Pope Urban IV championed the feast in his bull Transiturus in 1264, arguing that the day of the institution of the sacrament should be celebrated ‘not in sorrow in the Passion week, but on another, joyful, occasion’,3 that the feast gained real recognition. It reached England in the early fourteenth century, with the earliest references to its celebration coming from the west country, first in the dioceses of Bath and Wells and Gloucester in 1318 and in the diocese of Exeter in 1320.4 Dioceses across the country soon enthusiastically adopted Corpus Christi, adding a new festival to the progression of spring and summer events that began with Easter and ended with Midsummer or the feast of St John the Baptist, 24 June.
    [Show full text]