Volume 16 Preview.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume 16 Preview.Pdf TAEKWON DO (The Korean Art of Self-Defence) XVI VOLUME (SUPPLEMENTAL VOLUME) 1 2 TAEKWON-DO (The Korean Art of Self-Defence) By: Nick Campbell With: Catherine Galvin, Paul Bailey, Indra Talip & Jon Lennart Løbak Special Thanks To: Valda Gallagher, Renee Robinson, Matt Wood, 林琳 (Lin Lin), John Harvery, Zoe Campbell, Quinn Campbell, Aquielle Campbell, Dr. George Vitale Ph.D. (VIII Degree), Master Nathan Doggett, Grandmaster Al Cole, Grandmaster Jung Woo Jin & Grandmaster C.K. Choi Based On The Works Of General Choi Hong Hi 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Mokcha) FORWARD by Dr. George Vitale, Ph.D. (VIII Degree) . 10 PREFACE . 14 KO-DANG – TAEKWON-DO’S REPLACED PATTERN . 18 U-NAM – TAEKWON-DO’S FORGOTTEN PATTERN . 22 ADDITIONAL TECHNIQUES FOR PATTERN KO-DANG . 28 PATTERN KO-DANG . 33 ADDITIONAL TECHNIQUES FOR PATTERN U-NAM . 121 PATTERN U-NAM . 130 HOW THE PATTERNS WERE DOCUMENTED . 233 ANALYSIS OF THE PATTERN’S USE OF TERMINOLOGY . 264 CONDENSED PATTERNS . 284 Four Direction Punch (Saju Jirugi) . 292 Four Direction Block (Saju Makgi) . 294 Chon-Ji Tul . 296 Dan-Gun Tul . 298 Do-San Tul . 302 Won-Hyo Tul . 306 Yul-Gok Tul . 309 Joong-Gun Tul . 313 5 Toi-Gye Tul . 317 Four Direction Thrust (Saju Tulgi) . 320 Hwa-Rang Tul . 323 Choong-Moo Tul . 327 Kwang-Gae Tul . 331 Po-Eun Tul . 335 Gae-Baek Tul . 339 Eui-Am Tul . 343 Choong-Jang Tul . 346 Juche Tul . 350 Ko-Dang Tul . 355 Sam-Il Tul. 359 Yoo-Sin Tul . 363 Choi-Yong Tul . 367 Yon-Gae Tul. 371 Ul-Ji Tul . 375 Moon-Moo Tul . 379 Seo-San Tul . 383 Se-Jong Tul . 389 U-Nam Tul . 392 Tong-Il Tul . 396 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 400 INDEX . 402 6 Forward By Dr. George Vitale, Ph.D. (VIII Degree) As many will know, General Choi Hong-Hi authored a 15 volume masterpiece he called the Encyclopedia of Taekwon-Do. There should be little doubt that the scope of this work is truly unprecedented in the history of Martial Arts. During his lifetime (1918-2002) he wrote seven books on Taekwon-Do which have been translated into at least 10 languages. I am certain that no other Korean Martial Artist can brag of similar accomplishments and do not believe many other Koreans can boast of achieving a comparable level of global recognition for their leadership and teachings. The theme of a 16th volume to supplement, add to, or refine the over 3200 fundamental movements outlined in his life's crowning achievement has been bantered around for some time. Perhaps the first person who suggested this to me is someone who is my friend, colleague and senior – Master Earl Weiss, Esq. His idea was to use a 16th volume to fill in gaps that, for one reason or another, General Choi never had the opportunity to clarify. General Choi, like all human beings, had a limited time on Earth. Like all of us he was imperfect, however he left us with specific instructions to expand upon his teachings. He taught that changes could come, but cautioned us to consider them only after careful deliberation and deep thought. This book however is not primarily concerned with change, but rather addition. It is adding, or actually re-adding, two patterns that have never benefited from the expanded and detailed treatment that the current 24 patterns in the syllabus have had in the Encyclopedia. These two patterns, U-Nam Hyung (as they were called in those days) and Ko-Dang Tul, were removed from the syllabus back in 1960 and the early 1980s, respectfully. Since U-Nam was around only for a brief period of time (removed early on and only appearing in the 1959 Textbook, which was the first ever book on Taekwon-Do and very rare) it came to be called the 10 lost or forgotten pattern. Ko-Dang was of course in both the 1965 first English book as well as the 1972 Textbook. However, none of those books had the detailed and expanded layouts of the pattern's movements like that which appears in the Encyclopedia. So it appears that a Volume 16 which includes both of these heirloom patterns is a great place to start in further documenting General Choi's complete system. When these patterns were removed and replaced, there was the taint of politics involved. However, now in 2016, with General Choi gone, reacquainting the Taekwon-Do world with these gems can be done for pure technical enjoyment, minus any political restrictions or ramifications. Therefore, I salute Instructor Nick Campbell for his groundbreaking work and worthy contribution. My own research uncovered that a pattern named U-Nam (in honor of the first Republic of Korea's President, Dr. Syngman Rhee, Ph.D.) did indeed exist. However, it was by pure coincidence that U-Nam was rediscovered in my digital copy of General Choi’s rare 1959 book. The rediscovery happened at a conference in 2013 where I had only a limited amount of time to try to reconstruct it. The translation efforts were assisted by many, which in the end turned out to be both a blessing and a disadvantage. It gave us a creative opportunity that lacked consistency and an authoritative review. Mr. Campbell's work however was much more exhaustive and has resulted in a much better interpretation and more accurate recreation of this historic lost or forgotten pattern. He has extensively documented the source of every description, foot diagram, and photograph – all of which come directly from General Choi’s books. Likewise, the expanded detail with this pattern and the replaced Ko-Dang Tul provides a uniform addition to the other 15 Volumes. It is exciting to have a definitive way to examine the movements so students all around the world can recreate these Taekwon-Do gems. I appreciate Mr. Campbell’s efforts and I am certain that this Volume 16 will be a great addition to everyone's library. I encourage all students of Taekwon-Do to follow his lead and expand your Martial Arts knowledge. Mr. Campbell has trained in Taekwon-Do for over a decade and has 11 supplemented his Martial Art training and self-defense capabilities by cross training in other Arts. This is also how the Original Taekwon-Do began in the Korean Army as Military Taekwon-Do, which eventually became the Taekwon-Do governed and distributed by the ITF worldwide. Originally started as Mr. Campbell’s 4th degree paper, he has greatly expanded beyond the scope of his organizations’ grading guidelines with a work that can be embraced by all, no matter where they live or train! My sincere thanks and deep appreciation for sharing these historical gems! I whole-heartedly encourage others to submit ideas on adding to this project, either here within subsequent editions of Volume 16 or for Volume 17 and beyond. All Taekwon-Do will be better for it! – Taekwon-Do Historian Dr. George Vitale, Ph.D. (VIII Degree) 12 Catherine Galvin, Dr. George Vitale and Nick Campbell at the Dosanseodang Academy 13 PREFACE (Morimal) In Taekwon[-Do], “form” [tul, pattern] does not merely mean a simple form as in regular sports. It is an expression where every kind of exquisite skill of attack, defense and breaking are gathered together systematically into continuous movements. This makes it the core of the three essential elements of Taekwon[-Do] [forms, sparring and breaking]. For a General like Xiang Yu [項籍 232-202 B.C.] the task of breaking 2-3 bricks was an extremely easy thing. A Taekwon[-Do] opponent is always well trained with quick movements, so there is no use in basing it all on pure physical power. Furthermore, even just by sparring a naturally well-developed athlete, one will be able to hit and receive in a very similar way (as a trained person) even without systematic training and research. But that is not a scientific way of dallyon [conditioning], so in front of an opponent who is stronger and better conditioned one cannot achieve a big result. On the other hand, the forms were realized by several great masters’ long time research and experience, so they cannot be mastered without studying even though the person is strong and has fast movements. About practicing, there is a saying - "one form three years". Accordingly, in order to achieve the profound exquisiteness of each form one must invest a long time in its practice. That’s why the author [General Choi] emphasizes the forms instead of sparring and breaking and has depicted the features of actual fighting of the famous Generals of Korea and researched and improved them into new forms to inspire the patriotism of new generations. One must emphasize on the exactness of the movements and avoid the "dance likeness" of the form in order to show the proper power of Taekwon[-Do]. – “TAEKWON-DO TEXTBOOK” (跆拳道教本, 1959) page 125 14 Ko-Dang and U-Nam, two patterns connected by fate and politics, are invaluable parts of Taekwon-Do’s history. While neither pattern was discarded entirely, both are complete patterns once considered part of the syllabus. Over time, the namesakes of Ko-Dang and U-Nam failed to continue to inspire a positive patriotic image for all Koreans as each presents acute political discomfort for one side of the Korean Peninsula; Ko-Dang for the North and U-Nam for the South. However, as Taekwon-Do’s patterns are the core of the art, both patterns deserve inclusion in this Encyclopedia in order to document the whole of the art equally. The presentations of Ko-Dang and U-Nam presented below have been made as consistent and accurate as possible: • The modernized pattern description text is based on each pattern’s last official published text; Ko-Dang from “TAEKWON-DO: THE KOREAN ART OF SELF-DEFENCE” (1972, 6th Edition 1986) and U-Nam from the “TAEKWON-DO TEXTBOOK” (跆拳道教本, 1959).
Recommended publications
  • The Making of a Modern Myth: Inventing a Tradition for Taekwondo*
    Korea Journal, vol. 56, no. 1 (spring 2016): 61-92. © Korean National Commission for UNESCO, 2016 The Making of a Modern Myth: Inventing a Tradition for Taekwondo* Steven D. CAPENER Abstract In their recent article entitled “Evidence of Taekwondo’s Roots in Karate: An Analysis of the Technical Content of Early Taekwondo Literature” published in the Korea Journal, Udo Moenig, Cho Sungkyun, and Kwak Taek-Yong present compelling empirical evi- dence that taekwondo originated from Japanese karate in the mid-twentieth century. The present article aims to discuss the implications of that assertion in the context of the nationalist project to invent a tradition for taekwondo. This article postulates that such myth-making is possible even in the face of strong empirical evidence to the con- trary due to an anti-intellectual and anti-empirical nationalism that operates in the production/suppression of knowledge, especially in regard to issues that involve Korea’s complicated historical relation with Japan. This article discusses the process of the con- struction of an indigenous origin narrative for taekwondo and the response to that nar- rative in the form of a counter-narrative that postulates the role of karate in taekwon- do’s formation. The construction and rationale of the indigenous origin narrative is then examined through the lens of the modern phenomenon of the invented tradition. Keywords: taekwondo, indigenous origin, anti-intellectual, anti-empirical, national- ism, Japanese karate, invented tradition * !is article was supported by research funds from Seoul Women’s University. Steven D. CAPENER is Associate Professor of Literature and Translation Studies at the Department of English Language & Literature of Seoul Women’s University.
    [Show full text]
  • Choi Hong Hi (November 9, 1918 - June 15, 2002) Was a South Korean Army General and the Founder of Taekwon-Do
    Choi Hong Hi (November 9, 1918 - June 15, 2002) was a South Korean army general and the founder of Taekwon-do. As a retired Major-General, he was his country's first ambassador to Malaysia. He later fled the country and eventually settled in Canada and North Korea for the rest of his life. General Choi was born in what was to be North Korea during the Japanese Colonial Period and died in P'yongyang, the North Korean capital. During his adult life, however, Choi lived in Japan, South Korea, and Canada gaining the rank of Major-General during his career in the South Korean army. When written in combination with ones name, the military title General refers to a particular rank, that represented in the US and ROK armies by four stars worn on the collar. Choi, Hong Hi never held this rank; neither in the Army of the Republic of Korea, nor in any other army. The rank of general does refer to a four star general. They are also addressed as general. So in this case the rank and title are the same. However, a one star (brigadier) general, two star (major) general and three star (Lt. General) are all properly referred to as general. So the title to any general, regardless of stars is simply general. That is standard military protocol for the US and ROK Army. Choi did serve in the Korean army. He was a general officer. As a Brigadier, (wearing one star) Choi served as the Chief of Staff to General Paik Sun Yup, the first Korean officer to achieve four-star rank in that army.
    [Show full text]
  • Moo Duk Kwan
    Tae Kwon Do Moo Duk Kwan A Review What is Tae Kwon Do? • Taekwondo is a Korean martial art and the national sport of South Korea. In Korean, tae means "to strike or break with foot"; means "to strike or break with fist"; and means "way", "method", or "path". Thus, taekwondo may be loosely translated as "the way of the hand and the foot.” Source: Wikipedia So, what is Tae Kwon Do? • "Traditional taekwondo" typically refers to the martial art as it was established in the 1950s and 1960s in the South Korean military, and in various civilian organizations, including schools and universities. In particular, the names and symbolism of the traditional patterns often refer to elements of Korean history, culture and religious philosophy. Today, the Kukkiwon, or World Taekwondo Headquarters is the traditional center for Taekwondo in Korea. Source: Wikipedia What are Original Tae Kwon Do Schools? • The Five Original Kwans (Schools) – Song Moo Kwan - founded March 11, 1944 by Ro, Byung Jick. – Chung Do Kwan - founded in 1944 by Lee, Won Kyuk. – Moo Duk Kwan - founded after 1946 by Hwang Kee. – Kwon Bop Bu/Chang Moo Kwan - founded in 1946 by Yoon, Byung-In. – Yun Moo Kwan/Jidokwan - founded March 3, 1946 by Chun, Sang Sup. • Later Kwans (derived from the original five) – Han Moo Kwan - founded in August 1954 by Lee Kyo Yoon. – Oh Do Kwan - founded in 1955 by Choi Hong Hi, Nam Tae Hi, and Han Cha Kyo. – Kang Duk Won - founded in 1956 by Park Chul Hee and Hong Jong Pyo – Jung Do Kwan - founded in 1956 by Lee Yong Woo.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwan's Name: “Bluewaves” Meaning a Youngster's Spirit and Vitality
    The Development of the “Kwan’s” Kwan: in Korean literally means building or hall, but when used in martial arts it can also refer to a school or clan of martial artists who follow the same style and/or leader. At the time, there were 9 major Kwans throughout Korea and once someone joined a particular Kwan, it was very difficult to transfer to another Kwan. When someone wanted to transfer to another Kwan, his original Kwan Jang had to authorize and approve the transfer, but in reality, the Kwan Jang usually threatened the member using authoritative means in an effort to persuade the potential transferee to not leave. This was a critical issue in those days. Chung Do Kwan Established by Won Kuk Lee, seated in the middle and next led by Duk Sung Son, the back row, second from the right. After the independence of Korea, the Chung Do Kwan, one of the five key Dojangs, was founded first. It symbolized Chung Do Kwan's name: “Bluewaves” meaning a youngster's spirit and vitality. Chung Do Kwan's founder, LEE Won Kuk, moved to Japan when he was 19 years old in 1926. While in Japan, he first attended middle and high school, and then entered the Law School of Chuo University. Then he entered Japan's Karate headquarters, the Song Do Kwan (Shotokan). He received Karate instruction from Karate's father, Gichin Funakoshi. There, he learned Karate with Song Moo Kwan's founder, RO Byung Jick. Later, he moved back to Korea and taught Tang Soo Do in the Yong Shin school hall in Suh Dae Moon Gu's Ochun Dong, Seoul because he had a good relationship with Japan's Cho-sun Governor General Abe in 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Taekwondoаа the Three Kingdoms of Korea
    A History of TaeKwonDo by Isaac Myers (2016) Throughout the years, TaeKwonDo has evolved in many different ways. TaeKwonDo means “way of the fist and foot” or “the art of punching and kicking”. Its roots date back to over 2,300 years ago evolving into the two main TaeKwonDo organizations currently active. They are the International TaeKwonDo Federation (ITF) and the World TaeKwonDo Federation (WTF). The Three Kingdoms of Korea (300 B.C. ­ 676 A.D.) Around 300 B.C., the peninsula that we now know as Korea was three separate kingdoms. The first and the smallest of the three was Silla (57 B.C. ­ 936 A.D.). The second and by far the largest in both population and landmass was Koguryo (37 B.C. ­ 668 A.D.). The final kingdom was Paekje (18 B.C. ­ 600 A.D.). There was a great war for territory raging between the three kingdoms. This war lasted until Silla conquered Koguryo and Paekje and unified the three kingdoms in 676 A.D. The HwaRang th The 24 ​ king of Silla, Chin Heung, ordered a group of young men to be trained in the ​ ways of the bow and arrow, sword, spear, and SooBak. SooBak was a primitive form of foot fighting, using some hand techniques. The king called these individuals the HwaRang, meaning “Flowering Knight.” He also ordered a Buddhist monk and scholar, Won Kang, to train the HwaRang in the Buddhist religion and the art of Korean culture. Won Kang developed a code of conduct for the HwaRang. The code of conduct included five basic rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Kim Chi, K-Pop, and Taekwondo: the Nationalization of South Korean Martial Arts
    © Idōkan Poland Association “IDO MOVEMENT FOR CULTURE. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology”, Vol. 18, no. 2 (2018), pp. 1–14 DOI: 10.14589/ido.18.2.1 HISTORY & ANTHROPOLOGY John Forrest1(AE), Badger Forrest-Blincoe2(ABDEF) 1 Professor Emeritus of Anthropology, Purchase College, State University of New York (USA), 2 Yonsei University, Seoul (South Korea) Contact: No 213J Street 19z, Chey Chomneas, Daun Penh Phnom Penh 12206, Cambodia, (+855) 8987 3956, e-mail: [email protected] Kim Chi, K-Pop, and Taekwondo: The Nationalization of South Korean Martial Arts Submission: 11.12.2017; acceptance: 7.01.2018 Key words: Korea, taekwondo, tang soo do, taekkyon, nationalism Abstract Background. Forrest-Blincoe is a 4th dan black belt master in Tang Soo Do which he has studied in the United States and Korea. He has also studied Taekkyon in South Korea.1 During this time, he has been interested in the official histories of these martial arts in contrast with documented histories (which often differ significantly). Both Forrest and Forrest-Blincoe are trained anthropologists. Forrest specializes in symbols and national identity, and has published extensively on the anthropology of movement and dance. Problem and Aim. The martial arts Taekwondo, Tang Soo Do, and Taekkyon have competed within Korea for some time to rep- resent Korean culture, and Korea has used martial arts as an export as one component in its drive to gain legitimacy as a world power competitive with its more powerful neighbors of China and Japan. This paper examines the process of using martial arts as symbols of Korean national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Taekwon-Do Red Manual Available
    Mike Louie’s TaeKwon-Do School This Book Belongs to:______________ Updated January 2017 TaeKwon-Do Definition TAE – Jumping, flying, and kicking with the foot. KWON – Denotes fist, to punch or destroy with the hand. DO – An art or the way. The constant effort of a martial artist to improve in every facet of life. TAEKWON-DO: “The Way of the Hand and Foot.” Style of TaeKwon-Do We practice the Chan Hun style of TaeKwon-Do. It is based on 24 patterns, which represent one hour of each day of our lives that we dedicate to training, the tenets, and a better society through TaeKwon-Do. In 1955, General Choi Hong Hi named the art he founded as TaeKwon-Do. General Choi was born in North Korea and his lifelong dream is to see Korea once again unified. General Choi's pen name is Chan Hun, which means "small cottage". Tenets of TaeKwon-Do (TaeKwon-do jungshin) A tenet is an opinion, principle or doctrine, which a person holds as truth. EXPLANATION OF TENETS Needless to say, the success or failure of Taekwon-Do training depends largely on how one observes and implements the tenets of Taekwon-Do which should serve as a guide for all serious students of the art. COURTESY (Ye Ui) It can be said that courtesy is an unwritten regulation prescribed by ancient teachers of philosophy as a means to enlighten human beings while maintaining a harmonious society. It can be further be as an ultimate criterion required of a mortal. Taekwon-Do students should attempt to practice the following elements of courtesy to build up their noble character and to conduct the training in an orderly manner as well.
    [Show full text]
  • April 19Th, 1938 - November 28, 1985
    (April 19th, 1938 - November 28, 1985) Master Britt By Jesse Elliott: 3rd Dan I enjoyed going through the resources Sabom Medeiros passed on to us for Grandmaster Lee’s 80th birthday. It’s amazing to me that Grandmaster Lee could still be alive today -- 80 years isn’t really that old. But it seems like another age looking back at his life. There are so many stories about him and his training. It seems difficult to imagine training under him and yet, because of all the stories, I can almost picture it myself. The stories about Master Britt have always fascinated me. Master Britt was Grandmaster Lee’s youngest student, he was 12 years old when he started training. I was 10 years old when I started my martial arts training. I have many vivid memories from those early years, but I certainly wasn’t training under Grandmaster Lee. Master Britt was incredibly dedicated and very close to Grandmaster Lee. He was even with Grandmaster Lee in his dying days and was one of the last people to speak with him. On his deathbed, the day before he died, Grandmaster Lee promoted Master Britt to 5th degree, the highest rank Grandmaster Lee had ever awarded. It is inspiring to think of the dedication Master Britt had to the art and to his Master. When I read further about how Master Britt fell on hard times and was unable to teach or train for almost 8 years I was shocked. I had no idea he had been away from Martial Arts at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Taekwon-Do in North Korea: a Pedagogical Case Study
    © Idōkan Poland Association “IDO MOVEMENT FOR CULTURE. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology”, Vol. 20, no. 2 (2020), pp. 33–43 DOI: 10.14589/ido.20.2.5 PEDAGOGY AND TOURISM, AND MARTIAL ARTS TOURISM John A. Johnson1(A-G), Wojciech J. Cynarski2(A-E), Sunjang Lee1(BD) 1 Department of Taekwondo, College of Physical Education, Keimyung University, 1095, Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu (Korea), Tel.: +82-53-580-5760, e-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-9612 2 Department of Social-Cultural Foundations for Physical Education and Sport, University of Rzeszow, al. Tadeusza Rejtana 16C, 35-310, Rzeszow (Poland) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-5456 3 Department of Taekwondo, College of Physical Education, Keimyung University, 1095, Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu (Korea) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-8148 Corresponding Author: Sunjang Lee, e-mail: [email protected] Taekwon-Do in North Korea: A Pedagogical Case Study Submission: 7.08.2019; acceptance: 17.10.2019 Key words: musul (martial technique), muyae (martial artistry), mudo (martial way), General Choi Hong Hi, International Taekwon-Do Federation (ITF), behavioral-rational curriculum design Abstract Background. Notwithstanding the fact that the style of Taekwon-Do taught by the International Taekwon-Do Federation (ITF) was inaugurated in the Republic of Korea (ROK; South Korea) during the 1950s and 60s by the ROK Army General Choi Hong Hi, that style is known around the world as “North Korean Taekwon-Do” since it is also practiced in the People’s Democratic Repub- lic of Korea (DPRK; North Korea).
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 293 – Choi Hong Hi | Whistlekickmartialartsradio.Com
    Episode 293 – Choi Hong Hi | whistlekickMartialArtsRadio.com Jeremy Lesniak: Hey what's going on this is whistlekick martial arts radio episode 293 and today, we're going to talk about a controversial figure in the martial arts. A man often considered the founder of taekwondo sometimes General Choi Hung Hi. Here in whistlekick we talk about figures from martial arts, we interview guests we talk about other subjects, ego how to get better at certain things we really try to cover it all and that's because this is part of my development as a martial artist. My name is Jeremy Lesniak, I'm the founder of whistlekick we make sparring gear, we make apparel, we make kicking paddles, we make a bunch of other stuff, we’re adding new stuff all the time. And the best place to find that stuff is at whistlekick.com. You can also find a lot of our stuff over at Amazon, for the same prices because were trying to make it easy for you. Another thing that's easy for you is to head on over to whistlekickmartialartsradio.com check out photos videos, all the stuff that we collect for the show notes for this episode, for all of the other episodes that give you more context, more value around the words that I am speaking into your ears right now. While you're over there you can set up for the newsletter, you can comment on episodes and of course you can always reach out to us via social media, we are @whistlekick and my email address, my personal email address [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Taekwondo Doesn't Go Back 1000
    001_084_Taekwondo0907 30/7/07 3:08 pm Page 12 TAEKWONDOTAEKWONDO DOESN’TDOESN’T GOGO BACKBACK 1,0001,000 YEARS!YEARS! By Don Warrener “MY DREAM IS ONE TAEKWONDO!” Taekwondo’s Grandmaster Choi Hong Hi was most certainly a leader and visionary for one of the world’s most popular martial arts. He was the one who realised that Korea needed its own martial art with its own name and it was he who was able to bring about the joining together of the different martial arts in Korea under one roof. 12 | September 07 | Taekwondo and Korean Martial Arts 001_084_Taekwondo0907 30/7/07 3:08 pm Page 13 Moo Duk Kwan, Oh Do Kwan, Tang Soo Park has dedicated the new series to our dream of establishing a Korean hand-to- Do, and Chun Do Kwan were the original founder - General Choi Hong Hi. hand system of combat.” styles that contributed towards and were Park said, “Many Grandmasters and incorporated into the new. Masters have lied about Tae Kwon Do’s “Yes it is true!” said Park, “that our Tae roots. The fact that Tae Kwon Do does Kwon Do does have much more kicking Choi realized that he needed an individ- not go back 1,000 years should not than the other arts but the truth is that ual - an individual who was tech- embarrass us! Tae Kwon Do is new and our Tae Kwon Do came from Japanese nically gifted and who it is exciting!” Karate in the same way as Karate came embraced his own ideals of from Okinawan Karate, and the same as honor, integrity, humility and “In fact Tae Kwon Do goes back to the Okinawan Karate came from Chinese discipline - to help him propa- end of WW2 when our founder was in Kung Fu.
    [Show full text]
  • A Broken Family?
    © ITFNZ Inc 2016 TAEKWON-DO: A BROKEN FAMILY? Author: David Lo, 3rd Dan Edited by: Chris Morton, 1st Dan Prepared for: 4th Dan Grading Requirements Date: 18 October 2011 The materials in this thesis are summarised from published and publicly available sources as referenced. Some of the stories and references cannot be verified personally and Disclaimer may be subjective opinions as opposed to being factual. The interpretations of the story lines are of the personal opinion of the author. Page 1 of 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 3 2 GENERAL CHOI’S FAMILY ............................................................................... 4 3 HOW BROKEN WAS THE ORIGINAL TAEKWON-DO IN EARLY YEARS? ............. 7 4 DIFFERENT FAMILIES OF TAEKWON-DO ......................................................... 9 5 GENERAL CHOI’S IDEAS OF BUILDING A FAMILY AGAIN .............................. 11 6 PROPOSED STRATEGIES FOR A TAEKWON-DO FAMILY ................................. 13 7 REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 16 Page 2 of 16 1 INTRODUCTION Taekwon-Do (TKD) is an art of self-defence which was founded by General Choi Hong-Hi that has been through a series of bizarre and wondrous events. The exact date of the inception of TKD is unknown, but it was in development and the name itself was first mentioned in 1955. Taekwon-Do is not only an art of killing, but also an art of empowerment which includes many responsibilities. Taekwon-Do can empower more than just the body - some practitioners can control their mental states through this martial art. TKD can erode or raise a practitioner’s emotional state, can erode or empower families and countries. Practitioners can create or destroy reputations, careers or even friends.
    [Show full text]