Architecture with Landscape Methods Case Study of the Rolex Learning Centre Lausanne by SANAA Tokyo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proceedings of the 8th ISAIA, Nov.9-12, 2010, Kitakyushu, Japan A-34 Architecture with Landscape Methods Case Study of the Rolex Learning Centre Lausanne by SANAA Tokyo Daniel Jauslin Researcher, Chair of Landscape Architecture, Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology Dipl. Architect ETH, Principal at Drexler Guinand Jauslin Architects Rotterdam, Frankfurt, Zürich Abstract Contemporary architecture has been strongly influenced by the concept of landscape in recent times. A new mindset evolves that changes the core of the architectural discipline: the organization and composition of architectural space as a landscape. The scope of this thesis is to investigate and understand architecture that has been designed like a landscape. In projects of OMA, MVRDV, Peter Eisenman, Foreign Office or Diller+Scofidio the building inside and landscape outside do not merely interact, but the building is designed as an artificial landscape on its own. Landscape constitutes the inside. The landscape to architecture relation is turned inside-out. The author is studying these phenomena and their design methodologies. As a first finalized and completely documented case study the analysis of the Rolex Learning Center in Lausanne by SANAA is surely an important part of our discovery of landscape methods for architectural design. Landscape is developing here as the aesthetic mediator between nature and human. Keywords: Design Theory; Landscape 1. Introduction TheThe recentlyrecently opened Rolex LeLearningarning CentreCentre inin 1.2. Rolex Leraning Centre Case Study Lausanne of SANAASANAA TokyoTokyo may may well often be becited cited as aas ex- a Paper manuscripts should be written and arranged in exampleample of ofenormous enourmous success success of Asian of Asian architecture Architecure in the in a style that is succinct easily followed. An informative theworld world. in general. Especially It contributed if it’s oftentime to the honours of the two but short title, a concise abstract with keywords, and a principalsThis is the Kazuyo first presentationSejima and Ruye of this Nishisawa case study with to the a well-written introduction will help to achieve this. widerPritzker audience price (1) outside and alsothe TUto SejimaDelft. being nominated Simple language, short sentences and a good use of the curator of the Venice Biennale as first women and headings all help to communicate the information first1.1. Asian Architecture ever (2). withAll this Landscape happend Methodsaround the begin- more effectively. Discursive treatment of the subject ningPaper of 2010.manuscripts Their largestshould foreignbe written building and arranged yet is not in matter is discouraged Figures should be used to aid the aonly style a thatimportant is succinct contribution easily followed. to theses An successes informative but clarity of the paper. The reader should be carefully butalso short of particular title, a concise interest abstractas a built with landscape keywords, (3). and a guided through the paper. Always think about your wellSince-written 2008 introductionthe author ofwill this help paper to is achieve studying this. the reader. Simplephenomenon language, of Architecture short sentences with Landscapeand a good Methods use of DiscussionFig. 1 (above) Rolexmanuscripts Leraning Centreshould EPF Lausannefollow 2010the headingsin a series allof designhelp tocase communicate studies. This thepaper information is the first requirementArchitecture: of paper SANAA manuscripts Tokyo Foto: except Ariel that Huber they do morepresentation effectively. of the DiscursiveSANAA case treatment study analysis of the tosubject a wid- not have abstracts, keywords, introductions, or mater audienceter is discouraged outside the Figures TU Delft. should be used to aid the conclusions.mal and spatial They aspects must ofbe landscapessubmitted withinto describe 6 months their clarity of the paper. The reader should be carefully afterdesigns the and publication summarize date them of the under paper. the term ‘landscape’ guided1.1. Architecture through the withpaper. Landscape Always thinkMethods about your with various connotations. A new mindset evolves that reader.Contemporary architecture has been strongly influ- changes the core of the architectural discipline: the or- encedDiscussion by the concept manuscripts of landscape should in recent follow times. Anal-the 2.ganization Methods and composition of architectural space as a requirementogies to nature of paperare transforming manuscripts the except concepts that theyof form do landscape. The scope of the authors ongoing thesis is notand space,have afterabstracts, both formkeywords, and space introductions, had undergone or to 2.1.investigate Composition and understand of 4 Layers architecture that has been conclusions.revolutionary They developments must be submitted in modern within architecture. 6 months designedPaper manuscripts like a landscape. should be written and arranged in afterContemporary the publication architects date oftentimesof the paper. refer to specific for- a style that is succinct easily followed. An informative but1.2. short Architecture title, a concise as a abstractFour-Layer with Landscapekeywords, and a Daniel Jauslin, Researcher wellWe-written can distinguish introduction a development will help ofto architectureachieve this. to- TU Delft Faculty of Architecture Simplewards landscape. language, Weshort would sentences like to andput thisa good to a usetest, ofto Dept. Urbanism, Chair of Landscape Architecture headingsanswer the all question help toas tocommunicate what landscape the could information mean to P.O. BoxBox 5043,50 NL-2600 GA Delft morearchitecture effectively. as a concept Discursive or design treatment method. of Whilethe subject doing Tel: +31 6 392 51 377 matterso we iscould discouraged not only Figures expand shouldthe vocabulary be used to of aid archi the- e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] claritytecture ofwith the that paper. of landscape The reader but shouldalso formulate be carefully some guidedcommon through ground thefor apaper. new understandingAlways think ofabout SANAA’s your 8th ISAIA 2010 Architecture with Landscape Methods Daniel Jauslin 1 - 162 - Fieldtrip: SANAA Rolex Learning Center EPF Lausanne Rolexreader. Learning Centre in particular and a new kind of but short title, a concise abstract with keywords, and a architectureDiscussion in general.manuscripts should follow the well-written introduction will help to achieve this. requirementThere is an ofentry paper into manuscripts landscape architecture except that from they thedo Simple language, short sentences and a good use of sidenot ofhave architectural abstracts, theory: keywords, Steenbergen introductions, and Reh’s (4)or headings all help to communicate the information adaptationconclusions. of Theyan architectural must be submitted theory of within Paul Frankl 6 months (5) more effectively. Discursive treatment of the subject intoafter a the framework publication for date landscape of the paper.architectural composi- matter is discouraged Figures should be used to aid the tion. Frankl’s theory of Architecture is especially valu- clarity of the paper. The reader should be carefully ableTable to us, 1. Typebecause Table it involves Name Here. phenomenological, spa- guided through the paper. Always think about your tial,Column temporal, Header metaphorical, Goes andColumn programmatic Header Goesaspects. reader. Frankl’s particularHere skill is combining phenomenologicalHere Discussion manuscripts should follow the andRow structural Name Goescritiques Here of architecture intox a complete requirement of paper manuscripts except that they do systemRow Namefrom a Goes human Here perspective; he combinesx the log- not have abstracts, keywords, introductions, or ic Rowof making Name Goeswith thoseHere of perceiving architecture.x In conclusions. They must be submitted within 6 months his opinion, “people are part of architecture” - without after the publication date of the paper. Row Name Goes Here x Fig. 2 (above) Basic Form - Site and Building Topography them a building would be a “mummy” (5 p.159). We Montage of a relief of the site of EPFL in Ecublens (source www.geoplanet.vd.ch) with relief of Learning Center (rendered by the author) 1:10’000 Papermap source manuscripts www.geoplanet.vd.ch. should be written montage and by thearranged author in are Paperhere lookingmanuscripts for the should intellectual be written substance, and arranged content, in a II.2.6style The that four layersis succinct of the Landscape easily Architectural followed. Composition An informative sensea style of that the iswhole succinct (5 p.15)easily To followed. try and Anunderstand informative the turebutAsked shortof about their title, the futurearchitecture, a concise of learning abstractbut Kazuyo also the withfuture Sejima ofkeywords, their architecture,and Ryueand Kazyuo a architecture of landscapes, Clemens Steenbergen and SejimaNishizawa and Ryue Nishizawa want to want create to create a alandscape landscape for the for people the (El people Croquis 139)(7) – the but short title, a concise abstract with keywords, and a essentialwell -contemporarywritten introduction scenery. Landscape will sceneries help are hardto toachieve describe and this. splendid Wouterwell-written Reh have introduction established will a set help of layers to achieve - basic form,this. to– Simplediscover. the essential language, contemporary short sentences scenery. and Landscape a