DOCSLIB.ORG

Acariformes, Oribatida) Del Mundo (1758-2002)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Graellsia, 60(número extraordinario): 3-305 (2004) LISTADO SISTEMÁTICO, SINONÍMICO Y BIOGEOGRÁFICO DE LOS ÁCAROS ORIBÁTIDOS (ACARIFORMES, ORIBATIDA) DEL MUNDO (1758-2002) L. S. Subías* RESUMEN Se elabora por primera vez un listado mundial de ácaros oribátidos y en él se relacionan sistemática- mente las cerca de 9.000 especies (y subespecies) válidas hasta ahora descritas con sus correspondientes sinonimias, más de un millar, las cuales se agrupan en 1.204 géneros (y subgéneros), también con sus sinonimias reconocidas, pertenecientes a 169 familias. Para cada una de ellas se aporta su distribución geográfica actualmente conocida (alrededor de 3.200 especies paleárticas, 1.500 etiópicas, 1.500 neotro- picales, 1.400 orientales, 1.200 neárticas, 1.000 australianas y 100 antárticas), y lo mismo se hace para cada género y familia. Se han realizado numerosas modificaciones sistemáticas y nomenclaturales desta- cando la creación de las nuevas familias Cerocepheidae y Ametroproctidae, de los nuevos géneros Multimaudheimia y Perezinigokalumma y de los nuevos subgéneros Malaconothrus (Cristonothrus) y Oribatella (Multoribatella). Además se ha dado el nuevo nombre genérico de Paschoalia para Hammeriella Paschoal, 1898, nombre ya utilizado por Balogh, 1983, así como 83 nuevos nombres espe- cíficos y subespecíficos para otros tantos casos de homonimias que han surgido en la realización del lis- tado. Se reivindica y generaliza el uso del subgénero como una categoría taxonómica de gran utilidad y, en cambio, sólo se ha utilizado la categoría de subfamilia dentro de la extensa familia de los Oppiidae, la cual agrupa 13 subfamilias y 166 géneros (y subgéneros) válidos que incluyen unas 1.000 especies des- critas. Las distribuciones geográficas conocidas de algunas especies son notablemente ampliadas. Palabras clave: Ácaros, Oribatida, listado sistemático, taxonomía, biogeografía, nuevas familias, nue- vos géneros, nuevos subgéneros, nuevos nombres, sinonimias. ABSTRACT Systematic, synonimical and biogeographical check-list of the world’s oribatid mites (Acariformes, Oribatida) (1758-2002) This is the first check-list of the world’s oribatid mites in which the approximately 9,000 currently valid, described species (and subspecies) are systematically recorded. In addition, the list contains over a thousand corresponding synonomies, grouped into 1.204 genera (and subgenera) along with their recogni- zed synonomies, belonging to 169 families. The currently known geographic distribution is given for each species (approximately 3,200 palaearctic species, 1,500 ethiopic, 1,500 neotropical, 1,400 oriental, 1,200 neoarctic, 1,000 australian and 100 antarctic) as well as for each family and genus. Numerous systematic and nomenclatorial modifications have been made. Particularly noteworthy is the creation of the new fami- lies Cerocepheidae and Ametroproctidae, the new genera Multimaudheimia and Perezinigokalumma, and the new subgenera Malaconothrus (Cristonothrus) and Oribatella (Multoribatella). A new name, Paschoalia, is given to the genus Hammeriella Paschoal, 1898 (a name already used by Balogh, 1983) along with 83 new specific and subspecific names for other homonimies that appeared during the making of this check-list. The subgenus category is re-established as a very useful category and used widely in this revision; however, the subfamily category has only been used within the extensive Oppiidae family, which includes 13 valid subfamilies, 166 genera (and subgenera), and some 1,000 described species, only the sub- family category is used. The geographic distribution of some known species is notably enlarged. Key words: Mites, Oribatida, sistematic check-list, taxonomy, biogeography, new families, new gene- ra, new subgenera, new names, synonymies. * Departamento de Zoología. Facultad de Biología. Universidad Complutense. Madrid 28040. E-mail: [email protected] (c) Sociedad de Amigos del Museo http://graellsia.revistas.csic.es Nacional de Ciencias Naturales y Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Licencia Creative Commons 3.0 España (by-nc) 4 SUBÍAS Índice lias (incluso géneros y hasta especies) con una dis- Introducción ................................................................................ 4 tribución geográfica muy cosmopolita y que los Metodología ................................................................................ 5 taxónomos que se dedican a su estudio deban de Taxonomía y nomenclatura ........................................................ 6 hacerlo a un nivel mundial y no se puedan restrin- Biogeografía ................................................................................ 11 gir a faunas más o menos locales. Ordenación sistemática de familias y géneros .......................... 13 Listado sistemático de especies .................................................. 27 La continua descripción de nuevos taxones (al Comentarios al listado ................................................................ 223 ritmo de unas 150-200 especies y 10-15 géneros Agradecimientos ........................................................................ 224 por año), así como las permanentes recolocaciones Referencias .................................................................................. 224 de los ya existentes, han complicado enormemente Índice alfabético de nombres taxonómicos ................................ 229 la sistemática del grupo, proliferando las descrip- ciones de especies, en algunos géneros de amplia distribución, que no tienen en cuenta muchas de las Introducción ya existentes en la literatura (aunque en muchos casos es muy difícil disponer de toda la bibliografía Los ácaros oribátidos constituyen un grupo cos- existente por lo disperso de la misma) lo que, segu- mopolita de microartrópodos edáficos de los más ramente, implicará numerosas sinonimias cuando importantes, tanto por su abundancia en los más en el futuro se lleven a cabo las tan necesarias revi- variados tipos de suelos, hasta en los más adversos, siones globales; este es el caso, por ejemplo, del como por su diversidad pero que, desgraciadamen- género Scheloribates Berlese, 1908 (el que más te, no han sido tratados con la profundidad necesa- especies presenta de todos los oribátidos) que ria debido a su aparente poco interés económico incluye en la actualidad 234 especies (y subespe- (son de vida libre y saprófagos o microfitófagos), a cies) conocidas. También contribuye a esta comple- su pequeño tamaño (lo que implica mayores difi- jidad el hecho de que se describan nuevos géneros cultades de manipulación) y a su complejidad taxo- sin que se incluyan en ellos todas las especies que nómica; todo esto ha hecho que hayan despertado por su diagnosis deberían de estarlo, o que se basen poca atracción y hayan pasado bastante desaperci- en caracteres de nueva utilización que no se sabe si bidos, motivando que su conocimiento actual sea los presentan los taxones próximos ni cual es su bastante incompleto, existiendo en la actualidad verdadero valor filogenético-sistemático, y como extensas regiones del globo totalmente inexplora- nuestra intención ha sido facilitar el acceso de este das y siendo numerosas las especies (y otros taxo- complejo grupo a nuevos investigadores se han nes de nivel superior) que quedan por describir. considerado, por el momento, como sinónimos a Además, la tendencia general que ha habido en los una serie de taxones supraespecíficos de difícil últimos años (lo que afortunadamente parece que acceso, hasta para los especialistas. Todo esto ahora está cambiando) a menospreciar los trabajos explica que, aproximadamente, la tercera parte de de tipo taxonómico en favor de los ecológicos o los géneros descritos de oribátidos sean considera- aplicados, ha traído consigo que cada vez sea dos en la actualidad como sinónimos. Una de las menor el número de investigadores que se dedican pruebas de la complejidad nomenclatural existente al estudio de este grupo de artrópodos. dentro de los oribátidos y de la necesidad de traba- Por otra parte, se trata de un grupo animal muy jos como el presente, lo constituye el hecho de las antiguo del que ya se conocen fósiles paleozoicos: numerosas homonimias que se han recogido y que del Ordovícico (BERNINI et al., 2002), del Devónico han obligado a que se les tenga que dar un nuevo (NORTON et al., 1988) y del Carbonífero (SUBÍAS & nombre (procurando tener presente en todo ARILLO, 2002), muy similares a los actuales oribá- momento el Código Internacional de Nomenclatura tidos primitivos pertenecientes a los Palaeosomata Zoológica), en total 83 nuevos nombres específicos y Enarthronota, debido fundamentalmente a que el y subespecíficos, además de uno genérico. medio en el que viven, el edáfico, ha variado Por lo tanto, se hacía ya necesaria la existencia mucho menos que otros con el transcurso del tiem- de un listado mundial de especies de oribátidos po (dando lugar a formas más estables debido a que (algunos autores citan un trabajo de Piffl de 1969: su ritmo evolutivo sería mucho más lento que el de Katalog der Oribatiden der Welt, Zoologische otros grupos de animales) apareciendo ya desde el Institut der Universität Wien, que nunca fue publi- Jurásico fósiles de oribátidos pertenecientes a géne- cado) que recopilase las más de 10.000 especies ros presentes en la fauna actual y considerados descritas hasta la fecha y pertenecientes a los más como muy evolucionados, lo que ha motivado que de 1.500 géneros también descritos hasta ahora, los ácaros oribátidos de hoy en día incluyan
Recommended publications
  • Stanislav Knor Školitel

    Stanislav Knor Školitel

    UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE PŘÍRODOV ĚDECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE Interakce rostlin a hmyzu ve fosilním záznamu Bakalá řská práce Stanislav Knor Školitel: RNDr. Jakub Prokop, Ph.D. Praha 2008 Tímto prohlašuji, že jsem uvedenou práci vypracoval samostatn ě, s využitím uvedené citované literatury. V Praze dne 12. srpna 2008 Stanislav Knor 1 Abstrakt V sou časné dob ě je rozmanitost života na Zemi dána p ředevším druhovým bohatstvím hmyzu, cévnatých rostlin a jejich vzájemnými vztahy. Jejich po čátek spadá do doby p řed více než 400 milión ů let, kdy vznikly první suchozemské ekosystémy. Fosilní nálezy umož ňují geochronologické a taxonomické za řazení jednotlivých druh ů a jejich vývojových stádií. Přestože n ěkteré fosilní doklady jsou vzácné, existuje jich dostate čné množství k utvo ření relevantních záv ěrů. Studované fosilní nálezy související s koevolucí rostlin a hmyzu je možné roz členit následujícím zp ůsobem: poškození rostlinných tkání, koprolity, obsah trávící trubice, typy ústního ústrojí hmyzu a rozmnožovací orgány rostlin. Z t ěchto skupin pak mají pravd ěpodobn ě nejv ětší význam stopy poškození rostlinných tkání spole čně s morfologií hmyzího ústního ústrojí vytvá řející spojené funk čně potravní skupiny. Cílem bakalá řské práce je p ředstavení jednotlivých vývojových etap hmyzího ústního ústrojí, demonstrace n ěkterých p říklad ů herbivorních asociací hmyzu a rostlin, a to se zřetelem k jejich fylogenetickému postavení a stratigrafickému kontextu. Klí čová slova: Hmyz, cévnaté rostliny, fosilní asociace, herbivorie, typy ústní ústrojí, mina, hálka, poškození rostlin, koprolity, obsah trávící trubice Abstract Life biodiversity on the Earth is mainly represented by enormous richness of the vascular plants and insect species and their associations.
  • Deformation to Users

    Deformation to Users

    DEFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. IDgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell InArmadon Compai^ 300 Noith Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Conservation of Biodiversity: Guilds, Microhabitat Use and Dispersal of Canopy Arthropods in the Ancient Sitka Spruce Forests of the Carmanah Valley, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. by Neville N.
  • The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia

    The Armoured Mite Fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a Long-Term Study in the Scots Pine Forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia

    FRAGMENTA FAUNISTICA 57 (2): 141–149, 2014 PL ISSN 0015-9301 © MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY PAS DOI 10.3161/00159301FF2014.57.2.141 The armoured mite fauna (Acari: Oribatida) from a long-term study in the Scots pine forest of the Northern Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia 1 2 1 Uģis KAGAINIS , Voldemārs SPUNĢIS and Viesturs MELECIS 1 Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, 3 Miera Street, LV-2169, Salaspils, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology,University of Latvia, 4 Kronvalda Blvd., LV-1586, Riga, Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In 1992–2012, a considerable amount of soil micro-arthropods has been collected annually as a part of a project of the National Long-Term Ecological Research Network of Latvia at the Mazsalaca Scots Pine forest sites of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve. Until now, the data on oribatid species have not been published. This paper presents a list of oribatid species collected during 21 years of ongoing research in three pine stands of different age. The faunistic records refer to 84 species (including 17 species new to the fauna of Latvia), 1 subspecies, 1 form, 5 morphospecies and 18 unidentified taxa. The most dominant and most frequent oribatid species are Oppiella (Oppiella) nova, Tectocepheus velatus velatus and Suctobelbella falcata. Key words: species list, fauna, stand-age, LTER, Mazsalaca INTRODUCTION Most studies of Oribatida or the so-called armoured mites (Subías 2004) have been relatively short term and/or from different ecosystems simultaneously and do not show long- term changes (Winter et al.
  • Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

    Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska

    Zootaxa 4666 (1): 001–180 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4666.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA01E30E-7F64-49AB-910A-7EE6E597A4A4 ZOOTAXA 4666 Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER1,3 & ZOË LINDO1 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A0C6, Canada. 2Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Pfingstl: 26 Jul. 2019; published: 6 Sept. 2019 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 VALERIE M. BEHAN-PELLETIER & ZOË LINDO Checklist of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Canada and Alaska (Zootaxa 4666) 180 pp.; 30 cm. 6 Sept. 2019 ISBN 978-1-77670-761-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-762-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2019 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 4666 (1) © 2019 Magnolia Press BEHAN-PELLETIER & LINDO Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................5
  • Hotspots of Mite New Species Discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015)

    Hotspots of Mite New Species Discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015)

    Zootaxa 4208 (2): 101–126 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Editorial ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4208.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47690FBF-B745-4A65-8887-AADFF1189719 Hotspots of mite new species discovery: Sarcoptiformes (2013–2015) GUANG-YUN LI1 & ZHI-QIANG ZHANG1,2 1 School of Biological Sciences, the University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2 Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, Auckland, New Zealand; corresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract A list of of type localities and depositories of new species of the mite order Sarciptiformes published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology) during 2013–2015 is presented in this paper, and trends and patterns of new species are summarised. The 242 new species are distributed unevenly among 50 families, with 62% of the total from the top 10 families. Geographically, these species are distributed unevenly among 39 countries. Most new species (72%) are from the top 10 countries, whereas 61% of the countries have only 1–3 new species each. Four of the top 10 countries are from Asia (Vietnam, China, India and The Philippines). Key words: Acari, Sarcoptiformes, new species, distribution, type locality, type depository Introduction This paper provides a list of the type localities and depositories of new species of the order Sarciptiformes (Acari: Acariformes) published in two journals (Zootaxa and Systematic & Applied Acarology (SAA)) during 2013–2015 and a summary of trends and patterns of these new species. It is a continuation of a previous paper (Liu et al.
  • 10010 Processing Mites and Springtails

    10010 Processing Mites and Springtails

    Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute www.abmi.ca Processing Mites (Oribatids) and Springtails (Collembola) Version 2009-05-08 May 2009 ALBERTA BIODIVERSITY MONITORING INSTITUTE Acknowledgements Jeff Battegelli reviewed the literature and suggested protocols for sampling mites and springtails. These protocols were refined based on field testing and input from Heather Proctor. The present document was developed by Curtis Stambaugh and Christina Sobol, with the training material compiled by Brian Carabine. Jim Schieck provided input on earlier drafts of the present document. Updates to this document were incorporated by Dave Walter and Robert Hinchliffe. Disclaimer These standards and protocols were developed and released by the ABMI. The material in this publication does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of any individual or organization other than the ABMI. Moreover, the methods described in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the individual scientists participating in methodological development or review. Errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in this publication are the sole responsibility of ABMI. The ABMI assumes no liability in connection with the information products or services made available by the Institute. While every effort is made to ensure the information contained in these products and services is correct, the ABMI disclaims any liability in negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage which may occur as a result of reliance on any of this material. All information products and services are subject to change by the ABMI without notice. Suggested Citation: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, 2009. Processing Mites and Springtails (10010), Version 2009-05-08.
  • Mite (Acari) Ecology Within Protea Communities in The

    Mite (Acari) Ecology Within Protea Communities in The

    MITE (ACARI) ECOLOGY WITHIN PROTEA COMMUNITIES IN THE CAPE FLORISTIC REGION, SOUTH AFRICA NATALIE THERON-DE BRUIN Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Agrisciences at Stellenbosch University Promoter: Doctor F. Roets, Co-promoter: Professor L.L. Dreyer March 2018 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author hereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication therefore by the Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. ..................................... Natalie Theron-de Bruin March 2018 Copyright © 2018 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za GENERAL ABSTRACT Protea is a key component in the Fynbos Biome of the globally recognised Cape Floristic Region biodiversity hotspot, not only because of its own diversity, but also for its role in the maintenance of numerous other organisms such as birds, insects, fungi and mites. Protea is also internationally widely cultivated for its very showy inflorescences and, therefore, has great monetary value. Some of the organisms associated with these plants are destructive, leading to reduced horticultural and floricultural value. However, they are also involved in intricate associations with Protea species in natural ecosystems, which we still understand very poorly. Mites, for example, have an international reputation to negatively impact crops, but some taxa may be good indicators of sound management practices within cultivated systems.
  • Invertebrates and Nutrient Cycling in Coniferous Forest Ecosystems: Spatial Heterogeneity and Conditionality 255 T.M

    Invertebrates and Nutrient Cycling in Coniferous Forest Ecosystems: Spatial Heterogeneity and Conditionality 255 T.M

    INVERTEBRATES AS WEBMASTERS IN ECOSYSTEMS This is an edited volume honouring the contributions of Professor D.A. (Dac) Crossley, Jr to the field of ecosystem science. Invertebrates as Webmasters in Ecosystems Edited by D.C. Coleman and P.F. Hendrix Institute of Ecology University of Georgia Athens, USA CABI Publishing CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 10 E 40th Street, Wallingford Suite 3203 Oxon OX10 8DE New York, NY 10016 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 212 481 7018 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 212 686 7993 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] © CAB International 2000. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Invertebrates as webmasters in ecosystems / edited by D.C. Coleman and P.F. Hendrix. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–85199–394–X (alk. paper) 1. Invertebrates––Ecology. I. Coleman, David C., 1938– . II. Hendrix, Paul F. QL364.4.I58 2000 592.17––dc21 99–41246 CIP ISBN 0 85199 394 X Typeset in 10/12pt Photina by Columns Design Ltd, Reading Printed and bound in the UK by Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King’s Lynn. Contents Contributors vii Preface ix Part I. Webmaster Functions in Ecosystems 1 1 Food Web Functioning and Ecosystem Processes: Problems and Perceptions of Scaling 3 J.M.
  • Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites

    Fossils – Adriano Kury’S Harvestman Overviews and the Third Edition of the Manual of Acarology for Mites

    1 A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) with additional contributions from Lyall I. Anderson, Simon J. Braddy, James C. Lamsdell, Paul A. Selden & O. Erik Tetlie Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2011. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 11.5 American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2010 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the fossil record of spiders – and other arachnids – and numerous new taxa have been described. Spiders remain the single largest fossil group, but our aim here is to offer a summary list of all fossil Chelicerata in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list for Araneae follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Platnick Catalog. For this reason some of the family groups proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities.
  • Hungarian Acarological Literature

    Hungarian Acarological Literature

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals Opusc. Zool. Budapest, 2010, 41(2): 97–174 Hungarian acarological literature 1 2 2 E. HORVÁTH , J. KONTSCHÁN , and S. MAHUNKA . Abstract. The Hungarian acarological literature from 1801 to 2010, excluding medical sciences (e.g. epidemiological, clinical acarology) is reviewed. Altogether 1500 articles by 437 authors are included. The publications gathered are presented according to authors listed alphabetically. The layout follows the references of the paper of Horváth as appeared in the Folia entomologica hungarica in 2004. INTRODUCTION The primary aim of our compilation was to show all the (scientific) works of Hungarian aca- he acarological literature attached to Hungary rologists published in foreign languages. Thereby T and Hungarian acarologists may look back to many Hungarian papers, occasionally important a history of some 200 years which even with works (e.g. Balogh, 1954) would have gone un- European standards can be considered rich. The noticed, e.g. the Haemorrhagias nephroso mites beginnings coincide with the birth of European causing nephritis problems in Hungary, or what is acarology (and soil zoology) at about the end of even more important the intermediate hosts of the the 19th century, and its second flourishing in the Moniezia species published by Balogh, Kassai & early years of the 20th century. This epoch gave Mahunka (1965), Kassai & Mahunka (1964, rise to such outstanding specialists like the two 1965) might have been left out altogether. Canestrinis (Giovanni and Riccardo), but more especially Antonio Berlese in Italy, Albert D.
  • The "Giardino Di Boboli", Florence, Type-Locality of Many Species Mentioned in the Present Paper. BERLESE's PRIMITIVE ORIBATID MITES

    The "Giardino Di Boboli", Florence, Type-Locality of Many Species Mentioned in the Present Paper. BERLESE's PRIMITIVE ORIBATID MITES

    The "Giardino di Boboli", Florence, type-locality of many species mentioned in the present paper. BERLESE'S PRIMITIVE ORIBATID MITES by L. VAN DER HAMMEN Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden CONTENTS I. Introduction I II. Bibliography 4 III. Systematic review 8 IV. References 84 V. Index 90 I. INTRODUCTION Among the works of acarologists of the past, Berlese's numerous writings take a particular place. Although they contain descriptions of an enormous number of new species, and notwithstanding the fact that they must be regarded as an important contribution to progress of systematics, the way of publishing is superficial to such a degree that Berlese appears to be the author that created the largest number of problems. As a rule his Latin descriptions are extremely short and consist of a few lines only. When exceptionally a figure is given, it represents at most some elementary characters. It even happens that reference is made to a species of which the diagnosis has never been published, whilst on the contrary it also occurs that a species is men- tioned two times as new to science. Considering at the same time that it is difficult to recover the dates of publication of many papers, it is clear that reinvestigations are badly needed. Several authors published excellent descriptions of some of Berlese's species, but a review of a group has never been given. Besides, a complete catalogue of the records 1) and a definite bibliography are both still wanting. Because studies of the type-species of genera, and monographs of some groups of primitive Oribatid mites are in course of preparation, a revision of Berlese's material appeared to be inevitable.
  • Heft Oribatida 27.Pdf

    Heft Oribatida 27.Pdf

    ABHANDLUNGEN UND BERICHTE DES NATURKUNDEMUSEUMS GÖRLITZ Band 69, 2. Supplement Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus., Suppl. 1-24 Erschienen am: 19. 7. 1996 Redaktionsschluß: 12. 7. 1996 Bibliographia Oribatologica Nummer 27 Contens / Sommaire Publica tions 4 - 16 Nomina nova New spec ies / new subspec ies 16 - 19 New genera / n. gen. 19 - 20 New subgenera / n. subgen. 20 New subfamilies / n. subfam. 20 New combinati ons / n. co mbo 20 - 2 1 New names / nom. n. 2 1 New sy nonyms / sy n. n. 2 1 - 22 New statu s / n. staL 22 Con ferences 22 - 24 book review 24 2 BIBLIOGRAPHIA ORIBATOLOGICA [ISSN : 0863-1794] Zusammengestellt von Thomas Schwalbe In den ABHANDLUNGEN UND BERICHTEN DES NATURKUNDEMUSEUMS GÖRLITZ werden jährlich die neuesten Oribatidenarbeiten veröffentlicht , soweit sie uns bekannt wurden . Die Zu sendung Ihrer Publikationen sowie Informationen über gerade laufende Arbeiten sind die Basis dieser Bibliografie . Vorschläge und Kritiken sind zur Verbesserung sehr willkommen . Es wird eine Kostenbeteiligung von DM 10 . - erbeten . Bitte überweisen Sie auf das Konto 6165 bei : Niederschlesische Sparkasse , BLZ : 850 501 00 (Bitte geben Sie bei "Verwendungszweck" Bibliographia Oribatologica an) . Um Gebühren zu ersparen , schlagen wir vor , die Beträge für die Nummern 27-30 zusammen zu überweisen . Sind Sie an der Bibliographia in Diskettenform interessiert , legen Sie bitte e ine Diskette Ihrer Post bei . In ABHANDLUNGEN UND BERICHTE DES NATURKUNDEMUSEUMS GÖRLITZ latest works on Oribatei are published every year in so far as they have come to our knowledge . The basis of this Bibliography is to get your publications as weIl as informations about your current works . Proposals and criticisms are very wellcome for improvement .