REDD+ on the Ground

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REDD+ on the Ground REDD+ on the ground A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe Edited by Erin O Sills, Stibniati S Atmadja, Claudio de Sassi, Amy E Duchelle, Demetrius L Kweka, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo and William D Sunderlin REDD+ on the ground A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe Editor Erin O Sills Co-editors Stibniati S Atmadja Claudio de Sassi Amy E Duchelle Demetrius L Kweka Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo William D Sunderlin Editorial assistant Eskil Mattsson Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) © 2014 by the Center for International Forestry Research. All rights reserved. Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-602-1504-55-0 Sills EO, Atmadja SS, de Sassi C, Duchelle AE, Kweka DL, Resosudarmo IAP and Sunderlin WD, eds. 2014. REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Photo credits: Cover photos by Icaro Cooke Vieira/CIFOR, Marco Simola/CIFOR, Neil Palmer/CIAT, Ollivier Girard/CIFOR, Ricky Martin/CIFOR Pages 2 Nugroho Adi Utomo/CIFOR, 33 Kate Evans/CIFOR, 51 Neil Palmer/CIAT 68 Icaro Cooke Vieira/CIFOR, 86 Mariana Gomes Pereira/CIFOR, 106 Rodrigo Calvet/ CIFOR, 124 Marina Cromberg/CIFOR, 147 Valerie Garrish/CIFOR, 166 Dina Reyes/CIFOR, 188 Patrice Levang/CIFOR, 203 Patrice Levang/CIFOR, 222 Demetrius L Kweka/CIFOR, 234 Susan Caplow/CIFOR, 245 Demetrius L Kweka/CIFOR, 261 Demetrius L Kweka/CIFOR, 272 Demetrius L Kweka/CIFOR, 290 Nugroho Adi Utomo/CIFOR, 309 Yayan Indriatmoko/CIFOR, 329 Siswanto/CIFOR, 348 Yayan Indriatmoko/CIFOR, 362 Cut Augusta Mindry Anandi/CIFOR, 380 Cut Augusta Mindry Anandi/CIFOR, 401 Thu Ba Huynh/CIFOR, 420 Rodrigo Calvet/CIFOR Designed by CIFOR’s Multimedia Team CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all donors who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a list of Fund donors please see: https://www.cgiarfund.org/FundDonors Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers. FSC® C014287 Contents List of authors xiii Acknowledgments xviii Foreword xx Arild Angelsen Executive summary xxii Erin O Sills and Eskil Mattsson Part 1. Introduction 1 REDD+ on the ground: The need for scientific evidence 2 William D Sunderlin, Christy Desta Pratama, Astrid B Bos, Valerio Avitabile, Erin O Sills, Claudio de Sassi, Shijo Joseph, Made Agustavia, Uji Astrono Pribadi and Aneesh Anandadas Part 2. Case reports BRAZIL 2 Acre’s State System of Incentives for Environmental Services (SISA), Brazil 33 Amy E Duchelle, Maron Greenleaf, Denyse Mello, Maria Fernanda Gebara and Tadeu Melo 3 Bolsa Floresta, Brazil 51 Riyong Kim Bakkegaard and Sven Wunder 4 Cotriguaçu Sempre Verde, Brazil: Conservation and sustainable management of natural resources 68 Raissa Guerra, Amy E Duchelle, D Sergio de Freitas Jr. and Maytê Rizek 5 Jari/Amapá REDD+ Project, Brazil 86 Marina Cromberg, Mariana G Pereira and Renata B Caramez 6 Sustainable Landscapes Pilot Program in São Félix do Xingu, Brazil 106 Maria Fernanda Gebara 7 Sustainable Settlements in the Amazon, Brazil 124 Marina Cromberg, Amy E Duchelle, Gabriela Simonet and Alexandra Coraça de Freitas iv REDD+ on the ground PERU 8 The REDD Project in Brazil Nut Concessions in Madre de Dios, Peru 147 Valerie Garrish, Emilio Perales, Amy E Duchelle and Peter Cronkleton 9 Valuation of Environmental Services in the Managed Forests of Seven Indigenous Communities in Ucayali, Peru 166 Dawn Rodriguez-Ward and Pilar Paredes del Aguila CAMEROON 10 REDD+ around Mount Cameroon, southwest region of Cameroon 188 Abdon Awono, Akombi Andreas Tambe, Henri Owona and Elise Barreau 11 Community Payments for Ecosystem Services in the south and east regions of Cameroon 203 Abdon Awono, Elise Barreau and Henri Owona TANZANIA 12 Building REDD Readiness in the Masito Ugalla Ecosystem Pilot Area in Support of Tanzania’s National REDD Strategy 222 Demetrius L Kweka 13 Piloting REDD in Zanzibar Through Community Forest Management, Tanzania 234 Susan Caplow, Andina Auria Dwi Putri and Demetrius L Kweka 14 Making REDD Work for Communities and Forest Conservation in Tanzania 245 Therese Dokken, Andina Auria Dwi Putri and Demetrius L Kweka 15 Mpingo Conservation and Development Initiative: Combining REDD, PFM and FSC certification in southeastern Tanzania 261 Demetrius L Kweka 16 Pilot project on Community-Based REDD Mechanisms for Sustainable Forest Management in Semiarid Areas: The Case of Ngitilis in the Shinyanga Region, Tanzania 272 Andina Auria Dwi Putri and Demetrius L Kweka INDONESIA 17 Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia 290 Stibniati S Atmadja, Yayan Indriatmoko, Nugroho Adi Utomo, Mella Komalasari and Andini Desita Ekaputri Contents v 18 Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia 309 Yayan Indriatmoko, Stibniati S Atmadja, Nugroho Adi Utomo, Andini Desita Ekaputri and Mella Komalasari 19 Ketapang Community Carbon Pools, West Kalimantan, Indonesia 329 Dian Yusvita Intarini, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Mella Komalasari, Andini Desita Ekaputri and Made Agustavia 20 Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia 348 Yayan Indriatmoko, Stibniati S Atmadja, Andini Desita Ekaputri and Mella Komalasari 21 TNC’s initiative within the Berau Forest Carbon Program, East Kalimantan, Indonesia 362 Cut Augusta Mindry Anandi, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Mella Komalasari, Andini Desita Ekaputri and Dian Yusvita Intarini 22 Ulu Masen REDD+ initiative, Aceh, Indonesia 380 Cut Augusta Mindry Anandi, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Andini Desita Ekaputri, Mella Komalasari, Pangestuti Astri and Riza Aryani VIETNAM 23 Cat Loc Landscape – Cat Tien National Park Pro-Poor REDD+ Project, Vietnam 401 Thu Ba Huynh Part 3. Synthesis 24 REDD+ on the ground: Global insights from local contexts 420 Claudio de Sassi, William D Sunderlin, Erin O Sills, Amy E Duchelle, Ashwin Ravikumar, Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Cecilia Luttrell, Shijo Joseph, Martin Herold, Demetrius L Kweka and Stibniati S Atmadja References 445 Terms and abbreviations 482 Glossary 484 Appendices 490 List of boxes, figures and tables Boxes A Estimating forest loss and carbon emissions 8 Astrid B Bos and Valerio Avitabile B Challenges to measuring emission sources and sinks in REDD+ subnational initiatives 22 Shijo Joseph C REDD+ in-depth costing 24 Eduardo Marinho, Noah Greenberg, Demetrius L Kweka and Erin O Sills D REDD+ in Brazil: The national context 31 Sven Wunder and Amy E Duchelle E REDD+ in Peru: The national context 145 Mary Menton, Jazmín Gonzales and Laura F Kowler F REDD+ in Cameroon: The national context 186 Abdon Awono G REDD+ in Tanzania: The national context 219 Demetrius L Kweka, Sheryl Quail and Jessica Campese H REDD+ in Indonesia: The national context 287 Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, Stibniati S Atmadja, Nugroho Adi Utomo, Christy Desta Pratama, Andini Desita Ekaputri, Josil P Murray, Andina Auria Dwi Putri, Made Agustavia, Cut Augusta Mindry Anandi, Riza Aryani, Pangestuti Astri, Yayan Indriatmoko, Dian Yusvita Intarini, Mella Komalasari and Karlina Indraswari J REDD+ in Vietnam: The national context 399 Thu Ba Huynh K The role of women in early REDD+ implementation 440 Anne M Larson, Therese Dokken and Amy E Duchelle L Can REDD+ deliver biodiversity co-benefits in Indonesia? 442 Josil P Murray, Richard Grenyer, Sven Wunder, Niels Raes and Julia PG Jones Contents vii Figures 1.1 CIFOR-GCS abbreviated and formal names and locations of subnational initiatives. 6 C.1 Budgeted annual costs of the REDD+ initiatives over time. 24 C.2 Cost per household and per hectare of the Transamazon initiative and the Katingan Project. 25 C.3 Costs of the Transamazon initiative. 26 C.4 Costs of the Katingan Project. 27 2.1 Map of Acre. 35 2.2 Timeline of SISA in Acre. 38 2.3 Sources of income for all households in sample (n = 127). 45 2.4 Sources of income for average household by community (or village) (+/- SE) (n = 127). 45 3.1 Map of the Bolsa Floresta initiative. 53 3.2 Timeline of the Bolsa Floresta initiative. 59 3.3 Annual income shares among households in two Bolsa Floresta reserves (n = 192). 63 3.4 Household self-reported use of Bolsa Floresta family component payment in Juma and Uatumã reserves. 66 4.1 Map of the REDD+ initiative in Cotriguaçu. 70 4.2 Timeline of the REDD+ initiative in Cotriguaçu. 73 4.3 Sources of income for all households in sample (n = 122). 80 4.4 Sources of income for average household by community (or village) (+/- SE) (n = 122). 81 5.1 Map of the REDD+ initiative in Jari/Amapá. 88 5.2 Timeline of the REDD+ initiative in Jari/Amapá. 92 5.3 Sources of income for average household by community (or village) (+/- SE) (n = 122). 99 5.4 Sources of income for all households in sample (n = 122). 100 6.1 Map of the REDD+ initiative in SFX. 108 6.2 Timeline of the REDD+ initiative in SFX. 113 6.3 Sources of income for all households in sample (n = 124). 117 6.4 Sources of income for average household by community (or village) (+/- SE) (n = 124). 118 7.1 Map of the REDD+ initiative in the Transamazon. 126 7.2 Timeline of the REDD+ initiative in the Transamazon. 129 viii REDD+ on the ground 7.3 Sources of income for all households in sample (n = 137). 137 7.4 Sources of income for average household by community (or village) (+/- SE) (n = 137). 137 8.1 Map of the REDD+ initiative in Madre de Dios. 148 8.2 Timeline of the REDD+ initiative in Madre de Dios.
Recommended publications
  • Thailand Highlights 14Th to 26Th November 2019 (13 Days)
    Thailand Highlights 14th to 26th November 2019 (13 days) Trip Report Siamese Fireback by Forrest Rowland Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Forrest Rowland Trip Report – RBL Thailand - Highlights 2019 2 Tour Summary Thailand has been known as a top tourist destination for quite some time. Foreigners and Ex-pats flock there for the beautiful scenery, great infrastructure, and delicious cuisine among other cultural aspects. For birders, it has recently caught up to big names like Borneo and Malaysia, in terms of respect for the avian delights it holds for visitors. Our twelve-day Highlights Tour to Thailand set out to sample a bit of the best of every major habitat type in the country, with a slight focus on the lush montane forests that hold most of the country’s specialty bird species. The tour began in Bangkok, a bustling metropolis of winding narrow roads, flyovers, towering apartment buildings, and seemingly endless people. Despite the density and throng of humanity, many of the participants on the tour were able to enjoy a Crested Goshawk flight by Forrest Rowland lovely day’s visit to the Grand Palace and historic center of Bangkok, including a fun boat ride passing by several temples. A few early arrivals also had time to bird some of the urban park settings, even picking up a species or two we did not see on the Main Tour. For most, the tour began in earnest on November 15th, with our day tour of the salt pans, mudflats, wetlands, and mangroves of the famed Pak Thale Shore bird Project, and Laem Phak Bia mangroves.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRDS of HALIMUN-SALAK NATIONAL PARK, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA: Saitou, N
    Treubia 43: 31–46, December 2016 Treubia 43: 47–70, December 2016 BIRDS OF HALIMUN-SALAK NATIONAL PARK, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA: Saitou, N. & M. Nei 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-425. ENDEMISM, CONSERVATION AND THREATENED STATUS Simmons, N.B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D.E. & D.M. Reeder (eds.). Mammal Species of the Dewi M. Prawiradilaga World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. pp. 312- Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) 529. Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km 46 Cibinong 16911, Indonesia e-mail: [email protected] Suyanto, A. 2001. Kelelawar di Indonesia. Bogor: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. 126 pp. Temminck, C.J. 1827 (1824)-1841. Monographies de Mammalogie, ou description de quelques genres de Received: 8 August 2016; Accepted: 5 December 2016 mammiferes, dont les espèces ont été observées dans les différens musées de l’Europe. C.C. Vander Hoek, Leiden, 392 pp. ABSTRACT Thompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson & F. Plewniak 1997. The Clustal X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by the Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: Bird surveys and long-term bird monitoring in Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park were 4876-4882. conducted between 1998 and 2009 to obtain comprehensive data on the bird species in the area. Compilation of bird data from this study and other studies have recorded a total of 271 species, which is about 53.4% of van Strien, N.J. 1986. Abbreviated checklist of the mammals of the Australian Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • DIVERSITY of BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE and HABITAT GRADIENTS in FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS and RUBBER PLANTATIONS of NORTH SUMATRA Asep Ayat1,* and Hesti L
    Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 2, No. 2, October 2015, 103-120 ISSN: 2355-7079 / E-ISSN: 2406-8195 DIVERSITY OF BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE AND HABITAT GRADIENTS IN FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS AND RUBBER PLANTATIONS OF NORTH SUMATRA Asep Ayat1,* and Hesti L. Tata2 1Burung Indonesia, Jalan Dadali 32, Bogor 16161, Indonesia 2Forest Research and Development Center, Jl. Gunung Batu 5, Bogor, Indonesia Received: 31 March 2014, Revised: 10 May 2014, Accepted: 11 October 2015 DIVERSITY OF BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE AND HABITAT GRADIENTS IN FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS AND RUBBER PLANTATIONS OF NORTH SUMATRA. Birds play a pivotal role in the ecosystem, but in disturbed areas their roles may be limited due to the changes of their natural habitats. This paper studies the birds' habitats in Simalungun and Asahan Districts, North Sumatra. The study was conducted in four habitats: natural forest, rubber agroforests, rubber monoculture plantations and emplacement areas. The birds were observed using descriptive survey methods by implementing a quick biodiversity survey, data were collected along one km transect. The results showed that in total, 142 species of birds from 42 families were observed in the four habitats. Natural forests had the highest diversity of bird species, followed by rubber agroforests, emplacement areas and rubber plantations, with a Shannon-Wiener index of 3.8, 3.6, 3.0 and 2.9, respectively. Regarding the IUCN red list species, 12 bird species of near- threatened status and 2 species of vulnerable status were recorded. Based on CITES categories, one species was listed in the Appendix I, 12 species were classified in Appendix II and 26 bird species were protected under Indonesian regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIRDS of BUKTT TIGAPULUH, SOUTHERN RIAU, SUMATRA By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KUKILA KUKILA 7 No. 2 (1995): 99 - 120 THE BIRDS OF BUKTT TIGAPULUH, SOUTHERN RIAU, SUMATRA by Finn Danielsen and Morten Heegaard (first draft received 21 July 1994) Summary A study was made of the avifauna of the Bukit Tigapuluh area in Riau and Jambi Provinces, Sumatra in July-September 1991. This is the first major study of the lowland bird fauna of mainland Riau in this century. A total of 193 bird species was recorded, including 18 species listed as globally threatened. Extensions to known ranges were made for 26 species of which 25 were new to Riau and 3 to Jambi- Data were also provided on 5 species for which there were no recent Sumatran records: Cresttess Fireback Pheasant Lophura erythropthalma. Garnet Pitta Pitta granatina, Striped Wren-babbler Kenopia striata. Large Wren-babbler Napothera macrodactyla and Chestnut- capped Thrush Zoothera interpres. In addition, information on breeding was provided for 51 species, of which 22 species were not previously documented to breed in Sumatra. Introduction Between 26 July and 30 September 1991, under the auspices of the Norwegian Indonesian Rain Forest and Resource Management Project, the authors surveyed the avifauna of Bukit Tiga Puluh, centered on 1°00'S, 102°30'E, in the lowlands of Riau Province, eastern Sumatra. Observations were made in primary forest, logged forests, 'jungle rubber', and plantations, concentrating on six study sites. From a review of Marle & Voous (1988) it is apparent that few ornithological surveys have been conducted in Riau Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Second South-East Asian Songbird Crisis Summit
    S H O R T R E P O R T SECOND SOUTH-EAST ASIAN SONGBIRD CRISIS SUMMIT outh-east Asia is a hotspot for illegal and unsustainable trade in songbirds, leading to serious declines in many species. The vast majority of the songbirds in trade are taken from the wild, sought after for their attractive song, colourful plumage and their increasing rarity. Unfortunately, Ssongbird conservation has not received the attention it deserves, and as a result, many species have slipped perilously close to extinction, all but unnoticed. In September 2015, a group of concerned experts SERENE CHNGTRAFFIC / FDPHWRJHWKHUIRUWKH¿UVW$VLDQ6RQJELUG7UDGH&ULVLV Sharing the discussion outcomes following a break-out Summit, held in Singapore, to begin the process of group activity on behaviour change. co-ordinating a response to the alarming numbers of songbirds trapped from the wild in South-east Asia for domestic and international trade (see TRAFFIC Bulletin to end this crisis. The focus has also been on particular 7KLVXQSUHFHGHQWHGPHHWLQJLQWKHUHJLRQOHG species in dire need of immediate conservation attention, to the development of the much-needed Conservation including the Rufous-fronted Laughingthrush Garrulax Strategy for Southeast Asian Songbirds in Trade. UX¿IURQV , which is now known from fewer than a In this strategy, four main themes of work were dozen individuals, and others, such as the Sumatran LGHQWL¿HGWRUHGXFHLOOHJDODQGXQVXVWDLQDEOHELUGWUDGH Laughingthrush G. bicolor DQG WKH *UHDWHU *UHHQ LQ6RXWKHDVW$VLD7KHVHZHUHJHQHWLFDQG¿HOGUHVHDUFK Leafbird Chloropsis
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralisation of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan
    AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR INTERNATION- AL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Decentralisation of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Endriatmo Soetarto, MT Felix Sitorus and Yusup Napiri © 2001 by Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved. Published in 2001 Printed by Subur Printing, Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-85-4 Published by Center for International Forestry Research Mailing address: P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB, Jakarta 10065, Indonesia Office address: Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Decentralisation and Forests in Indonesia: An Overview of the Study ince early-2000, the Center for International Forestry S Research (CIFOR) has conducted research on the decentralisation of forest administration and policies affecting forests in Indonesia. This project has sought to document the real and anticipated impacts of decentralisation on forest management, forest community livelihoods, and economic development at the provincial and district levels. During the initial phase of this research, CIFOR conducted case studies in nine kabupaten or districts, in four provinces: Riau, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, and West Kalimantan. These case studies were carried out in 2000, with follow up visits to some districts conducted in early 2001. As such, the findings presented in the present report and the companion case studies reflect the conditions and processes that existed in the study districts during the initial phase of Indonesia’s decentralisation process. The following reports have been produced by this project. The first of these represents a synthesis of the major findings from the nine case studies, accompanied by a historical analysis of forest administration and forestry sector development in Indonesia, and a discussion of the origins and legal-regulatory basis of the nation’s ongoing decentralisation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Procedural Equity in Government-Led Community-Based Forest Management
    Copyright © 2020 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Friedman, R. S., J. R. Rhodes, A. J. Dean, E. A. Law, T. Santika, S. Budiharta, J. A. Hutabarat, T. P. Indrawan, A. Kusworo, E. Meijaard, F. A. V. St. John, M. J. Struebig, and K. A. Wilson. 2020. Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management. Ecology and Society 25(3):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11710-250316 Research Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management Rachel S. Friedman 1, Jonathan R. Rhodes 1, Angela J. Dean 2,3, Elizabeth A. Law 4,5, Truly Santika 6,7,8, Sugeng Budiharta 9, Joseph A. Hutabarat 10, Tito P. Indrawan 10, Ahmad Kusworo 10,11, Erik Meijaard 7,12, Freya A.V. St. John 13, Matthew J. Struebig 7 and Kerrie A. Wilson 2 ABSTRACT. Participatory approaches to forest management have been promoted as a means of returning rights historically removed, and as a way of managing natural resources sustainably, fairly, and to improve livelihoods in communities. Top-down models of community-based forest management take the perspective that if people feel ownership over, have a voice in decisions about, and can benefit from surrounding ecosystems, then they will be motivated to maintain and protect them. However, even participatory approaches, such as community-based forest management, may not always result in clear positive outcomes for involvement in decision making and forest conservation. We examine whether an Indonesian government initiative for community-based forest management was positively associated with community members' participation in local decision making and support for conservation and sustainable management of forest resources, in the context of state-owned lands.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to GENERA and SPECIES Genera and Species Listed in Appendices Are Not Indexed
    INDEX TO GENERA AND SPECIES Genera and species listed in appendices are not indexed Abarema filamentosa . 483 minuta ........................ 444 Abrophyllum . .. 223 Arenga undulatifolia .................. 444 Abryna regispetri .................... 94 Argyrodendron peralatum . 373 Acacia. .. 11 Arhopala buddTia .................... 292 Acalypha stipulacea .................. 327 metamuta ....................... 292 Acantho/epsls ...................... 120 Armigeres ....................... 89, 97 Acanthomyrmex ..................... 120 dolichocephalus . .. 93 Acer saccharum ..................... 219 flavus .. .. 93 Acmena acuminatissima ................ 327 Artocarpus ovatus .................... 328 Acronychia vestita ................... 219 Asyndetus . 185 Acropsilus . 185 Athertonia diversifolia .. .. 224, 225 Acropyga ......................... 120 Atta ............................ 10 Actyolepis puspa .................... 292 Attalea acaulis . 479 Acylophorus ................... 88-91, 93 funifera .................. 477-479, 483 Adinandra ...................... .. 223 humilis ........................ 483 Aedes gombakensis . .. 93 Baccaurea kunst/eri . 155 Aenictus . 120 Bactris . 483 Afromomum ..................... .. 219 Baptista ................. 88-90, 93, 96, 97 Agelaea bomeensis ................... 441 Barbodes collingwoodi .... 309-312, 380, 381, 384 Aglaia ditfusa ...................... 327 Barringtonia . 429 iloilo ......................... 328 Basilia hispida . .. 91 llanosiana ...................... 327 Batraxis . .. 93 longipes
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following for their schemes which came back to us with written feedback and comments: Sergio Bafoni, Lafcadio feedback and comments, including the RSPO, the Cortesi, Catharine Grant, Aida Greenbury, Jonas Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, ISCC, MSPO, RTRS, Hulsens, Cristina Mestre, Shiobhan Pearce ProTerra and PEFC. We incorporated these where and Nancy Vallejo. possible and where appropriate. The responses we received from the schemes are all available on Furthermore we would like to thank several the Greenpeace International website. researchers that helped complete the report, including Rachel Wheeler, Barbara Kuepper Designer: Sam Walter, Festoon Studios from Profundo, Nick Mawdsley, Mario Rautner, Front page image: Rebecca Spencer and Rob Sykes. 24 June, 2013 - Indonesia. Open flames on dry We shared the draft text about the different tree branches in an area of recently deforested schemes from Chapters 2 and 3, including the peatland in the PT Rokan Adiraya Plantation oil draft scorecard, with the respective schemes palm concession. for comments. We would like to thank the 'Certification does not equal the definition of deforestation-free.' Marc Engel, chief supply chain officer Unilever1 1 Webster, B. (2020, 24 August) 2 CONTENTS Executive summary 8 Introduction 14 Certification – definitions 18 Contents Chapter 1: Inherent limitations of certification 20 Chapter 2: Key aspects that determine certification schemes’ effectiveness and credibility 26 Governance and decision making 28 Standards
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDES BIRDING TOURS Borneo
    Field Guides Tour Report Borneo Jun 7, 2012 to Jun 24, 2012 Rose Ann Rowlett & Hamit Suban Sunrise over craggy Mt. Kinabalu, as seen from our doorsteps at the Hill Lodge inside Kinabalu Park. (Photo by tour participant Fred Dalbey) It was another fabulous tour to Borneo! As always, it was different from all previous tours in many of the specifics, from the weather (windy and rainy in the highlands this trip; surprisingly dry in the lowlands) to some of the birds and other critters observed. But there is great overlap among many of the spectacular basics from one tour to the next. And we had another wonderful sampling of the best of Borneo. In our efforts to overcome jetlag, we all arrived early and managed to get in a little extra birding pre-tour. Most folks went to Manukan Island for a morning, and we all went to the KK Wetland the day before the tour started, seeing a handful of species we wouldn't see on our official tour route. I've included those species in the list below since most folks in the group were experiencing Asian birding for the first time. Our most exciting encounter was with a pair of White-breasted Waterhens duetting as we watched at close range. We began officially in the Crocker Range, where we saw a number of highland endemics, from the usually very tough Whitehead's Spiderhunter to Mountain and Bornean barbets, Bornean Bulbul, Bornean Leafbird, and endearing flocks of Chestnut-crested Yuhinas, not to mention the non-endemic but dramatic Long-tailed Broadbill.
    [Show full text]
  • Destruction: Certified 3 5 26 Greenpeace International - Destruction: Certified - Destruction: International Greenpeace Clearly and Demonstrably Met the Indicator
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS Executive summary 8 We would like to thank the following for their schemes which came back to us with written feedback and comments: Sergio Bafoni, Lafcadio feedback and comments, including the RSPO, the Introduction 14 Cortesi, Catharine Grant, Aida Greenbury, Jonas Rainforest Alliance, Fairtrade, ISCC, MSPO, RTRS, Hulsens, Cristina Mestre, Shiobhan Pearce ProTerra and PEFC. We incorporated these where Certification – definitions 18 and Nancy Vallejo. possible and where appropriate. The responses Contents we received from the schemes are all available on Furthermore we would like to thank several Chapter 1: Inherent limitations of certification 20 the Greenpeace International website. researchers that helped complete the report, including Rachel Wheeler, Barbara Kuepper Designer: Sam Walter, Festoon Studios Chapter 2: Key aspects that determine certification schemes’ effectiveness and credibility 26 from Profundo, Nick Mawdsley, Mario Rautner, Front page image: Rebecca Spencer and Rob Sykes. Governance and decision making 28 24 June, 2013 - Indonesia. Open flames on dry We shared the draft text about the different tree branches in an area of recently deforested Standards 30 schemes from Chapters 2 and 3, including the peatland in the PT Rokan Adiraya Plantation oil Traceability and transparency 34 draft scorecard, with the respective schemes palm concession. Contents for comments. We would like to thank the Auditing 38 Implementation 40 Chapter 3: Analysis of the major certification schemes 52 Biofuels certification
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Master’s Program in Environmental Sciences Process of Deforestation and Agricultural Expansions in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia Franky Zamzani 200620287 January 2008 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirementsٍ for the degree of Master of Environmental Sciences, in the Master’s Program in Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba Process of Deforestation and Agricultural Expansions in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia Franky Zamzani 200620287 January 2008 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Sciences, in the Master’s Program in Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba Degree Assessment Board Prof. Misa MASUDA Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences Kunihiko YOSHINO, PhD Graduate School of System and Information Engineering DISCLAIMER This document describes work undertaken as part of a program of study at Master’s Program in Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the institute. This work is dedicated to my national park for sustainable management ABSTRACT Gunung Palung National Park (GPNP) represents the biodiversity of tropical forests remaining in Kalimantan Island. However, the natural ecosystem has been threatened by human impact. This study aimed to identify the deforestation process inside the national park by imagery analysis of Landsat TM (1992), Landsat ETM+ (1999), and SPOT5 (2004), and to find the driving forces behind agricultural expansions by interviews to randomly selected households living nearby GPNP. Supervised classification method combined with visual interpretation and field-based analysis was applied to map land cover changes and specify the human impact.
    [Show full text]