DOCSLIB.ORG

!IJJJ OJ Considered Together for the Purpose of Displaying the Same Imagery, However, the Inherent Incompatibility Becomes ..R---···------, More Clear

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
!IJJJ OJ Considered Together for the Purpose of Displaying the Same Imagery, However, the Inherent Incompatibility Becomes ..R---···------, More Clear SMPTE TUTORIAL Searching for the Perfect Aspect Ratio By Mark Schubin A debate is currently taking place over the appropriate aspect ratio for some degradation of the imagery advanced television displays. Any selected aspect ratio is inherently involved.' There are only three basic incompatible with any other and will require the use of some form of methods of accommodating existing accommodation technique. The derivation ofthe 16:9 (1.78:1) aspect ratio material shot in a fixed aspect ratio on a display of a different fixed aspect ratio, from accommodation techniques and display modes is explained, as is the though the techniques may be com­ relationship between aspect ratio and display memory. Research into the bined. These three basic techniques are history ofaspect ratios indicates that the 1.78:1 aspect ratio was adopted shown in Fig. 1. by the Standards Committee of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers Figure I a shows the truncation (SMPE) in 1930. It also indicates that the factors that may initially have method, a variant of which is some­ led to widescreen motion picture systems may no longer be applicable. times referred to as "pan and scan." The research for this paper found no clear indication ofa preference for When going from a wider aspect ratio any particular aspect ratio for moving images nor any physiological rea­ to a narrower one in this method, the son to favor one over another. The research did show that cinematogra­ heights of the two images are matched, phers have not always favored the same aspect ratio. and any excess width in the wider image is removed from the display. The A 1988 paper entitled "Another That incompatibility became most position of the displayed rectangle in ./'"'\..Method of Aspect-Ratio Conver­ noticeable in 1961, when the 1953 the pan-and-scan mode may vary either sion For Use In Receiver-Compatible CinemaScope movie, How to Marry a by gradual panning (or tilting, in the EDTV Systems" begins: ''Two systems Millionaire, was broadcast on the NBC case of accommodation of a narrower with different aspect ratios are inherently television network.' Intended to be seen aspect ratio) or by rapid repositioning incompatible."' (EDTV is extended-def­ at an aspect ratio of 2.55: 1 (and with (cutting) between frames. inition television.) The statement bears image composition intentionally filling Figure 1b shows the shrinking looking into. the wide frame), the movie was truncat­ method, referred to as "letterbox," due For the purposes of this paper, aspect ed to television's 4:3 (1.33:1). Almost to the shape of the shrunken image ratio will be defined as the ratio of an immediately, technical publications window when a wider aspect ratio is image's width to its height. Ever since began to carry information about how being accommodated on a narrower there have been rectangular images, best to deal with the "conversion" of display. The black bands need not be there have been aspect ratios (and it one aspect ratio to another.' evenly spaced. It is often the case that may be argued that even elliptical the lower band (when a wider aspect images have aspect ratios). Aspect Ratio Accommodation ratio is being accommodated) is made We are surrounded daily by multiple In fact, imagery is not "converted" larger for the purpose of carrying subti­ aspect ratios not seeming to cause any from one aspect ratio to another; one tles, and, as will be discussed later in incompatibility problems. Images in aspect ratio is merely accommodated this paper, when a narrower ratio is newspapers and magazines have a vari­ by another, almost invariably with being accommodated, the elimination ety of aspect ratios both greater and less than one; the same is true of paintings and photographs. Even some computer display screens may be rotated from a horizontal aspect ratio (landscape) to a vertical one (portrait). When theatrical motion picture and television screens are !IJJJ OJ considered together for the purpose of displaying the same imagery, however, the inherent incompatibility becomes ..r---···-------------, more clear. Presented at the 137th SMPTE Technical Conference in New Orleans (paper no. 137·61) on September 8. , J0 1995. Mark Schubin is a technological consultant in New York. NY 10036. An unedited version of this paper appeared in Moving Images: Meeting the B c Challenges, SMPTE. 1995. Copyright © 1996 by the A Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. Inc. Figure 1. Aspect ratio accommodation: (a) truncation; (b) shrinking; and (c) distortion. 460 SMPTE Journal, August 1996 Authorized licensed use limited to: Mark Schubin. Downloaded on August 22,2016 at 17:03:04 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. SMPTE TUTORIAL of one of the side bands offers the pos­ preserves the original image composi­ oped for excitation of the unused areas sibility of stacking additional images in tion but reduces the visual angle avail­ with signals that vary to match average the other side band, a technique that has able to the viewer and, often, resolution picture level, however, and those tech­ been referred to as multiple picture-in­ as well. Detail that is just perceptible in niques appear to eliminate image strip­ picture (MPIP). an image when it is viewed at a particu­ ing." No investigation of viewer accep­ Figure lc shows the distortion lar display resolution will be lost if the tance of display stripes with varying method, whereby the linearity of the same image is shrunk on the same dis­ brightness was found in the research for geometry of the image is changed to play. this paper. squeeze it into a different display In most cases when the viewing The differential phosphor luminance shape. In a recent variation on this tech­ screen is video-based, this shrinking decay issue is related only to displays nique, a nonlinear distortion is used, results in noticeably empty portions of using phosphors, such as those based affecting the edges of the image more the display device, a condition that has on typical direct-view or projection than the center (e.g., in two of JYC's been considered objectionable to audi­ cathode-ray tubes. Some video projec­ consumer widescreen projection ences by some television program­ tors, such as the Schlieren-optics-based receivers). mers." One television set manufacturer Eidophor,!" have never used phosphors, As can be seen from the two rows of (lVC) has introduced a widescreen and advanced television displays may Fig. 1, the same basic methods apply model with a mechanical masking sys­ be able to take advantage of other phos­ whether the original image is wider tem that covers the unused portions of phor-free technologies. 11.12 than the display or narrower. In fact, the display much as drapes mask There are two other techniques asso­ the same techniques apply whether the unused portions of some motion picture ciated with aspect ratio accommoda­ two aspect ratios are both film, both theater screens, possibly resulting in the tion, but they require that either the video, or one of each. From 1961 to reduction or elimination of such objec­ image or the display be effectively non­ date, however, generally only the tech­ tions.' fixed in shape. One of these techniques niques of the upper row have been A potentially more serious problem is sometimes used in video walls. As seen, as widescreen movies have been related to the shrinking technique is shown in Fig. 2, a video walI com­ shown on narrower video screens in differential phosphor luminance prised of 4:3 image modules can create homes, aircraft, or other venues. Unless decay, a reduction in the light output a 4:3 image when stacked in a 3 x 3 or otherwise specified, the word wide­ of the cathode ray tube phosphors in 4 x 4 module configuration, but the screen, for the purposes of this paper, the active picture section relative to same modules can create a 16:9 will be used as defined by the British that in the blank section, often affect­ (1.78:1) image when stacked in a 4 x 3 Kinematograph Sound and Television ing blue phosphors more than red or configuration. Society (BKSTS): "in general, pictures green." As a result, when the full dis­ When the goal has been not aspect presented with an aspect ratio greater play area is viewed, the shrunken ratio accommodation but the creation than 1.4:1."5 image area can become visible as a of a different aspect ratio than is com­ AlI of the accommodation tech­ stripe somewhat yellower than the rest monly used in a particular medium, niques of Fig. 1 are problematic. of the display. The effect is greater in similar modular-screen techniques have Sometimes aspect ratio accommodation projection displays than in direct-view been used in many film and video pro­ is demonstrated with so-called "neu­ displays due to the higher beam cur­ jection systems. These range from the tral" imagery: pictures that appear no rents of the former. 19th-century Cineorama system (using less desirable when cropped. Motion It has been suggested that the differ­ ten interlocked motion picture film pro­ pictures and television shows are not ential phosphor luminance decay prob­ jectors)" to the current Geographica shot to be neutral, however. The trunca­ lem may be eliminated by making the theater (using three synchronized video tion technique clearly causes portions inactive sections of the display gray sources) at the National Geographic of the image to be lost, and the variants instead of black, but in one experiment, Society's Explorers Hall in Washing­ associated with pan and scan introduce the outline of an inactive section of a ton, D.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof
    CHAPTER 4 ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. SECTION 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample IV: Division into Cases and the Quotient-Remainder Theorem Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Direct Proof and Counterexample IV: Division into Cases and the Quotient-Remainder Theorem The quotient-remainder theorem says that when any integer n is divided by any positive integer d, the result is a quotient q and a nonnegative remainder r that is smaller than d. 3 Example 1 – The Quotient-Remainder Theorem For each of the following values of n and d, find integers q and r such that and a. n = 54, d = 4 b. n = –54, d = 4 c. n = 54, d = 70 Solution: a. b. c. 4 div and mod 5 div and mod A number of computer languages have built-in functions that enable you to compute many values of q and r for the quotient-remainder theorem. These functions are called div and mod in Pascal, are called / and % in C and C++, are called / and % in Java, and are called / (or \) and mod in .NET. The functions give the values that satisfy the quotient-remainder theorem when a nonnegative integer n is divided by a positive integer d and the result is assigned to an integer variable. 6 div and mod However, they do not give the values that satisfy the quotient-remainder theorem when a negative integer n is divided by a positive integer d. 7 div and mod For instance, to compute n div d for a nonnegative integer n and a positive integer d, you just divide n by d and ignore the part of the answer to the right of the decimal point.
    [Show full text]
  • CINERAMA: the First Really Big Show
    CCINEN RRAMAM : The First Really Big Show DIVING HEAD FIRST INTO THE 1950s:: AN OVERVIEW by Nick Zegarac Above left: eager audience line ups like this one for the “Seven Wonders of the World” debut at the Cinerama Theater in New York were short lived by the end of the 1950s. All in all, only seven feature films were actually produced in 3-strip Cinerama, though scores more were advertised as being shot in the process. Above right: corrected three frame reproduction of the Cypress Water Skiers in ‘This is Cinerama’. Left: Fred Waller, Cinerama’s chief architect. Below: Lowell Thomas; “ladies and gentlemen, this is Cinerama!” Arguably, Cinerama was the most engaging widescreen presentation format put forth during the 1950s. From a visual standpoint it was the most enveloping. The cumbersome three camera set up and three projector system had been conceptualized, designed and patented by Fred Waller and his associates at Paramount as early as the 1930s. However, Hollywood was not quite ready, and certainly not eager, to “revolutionize” motion picture projection during the financially strapped depression and war years…and who could blame them? The standardized 1:33:1(almost square) aspect ratio had sufficed since the invention of 35mm celluloid film stock. Even more to the point, the studios saw little reason to invest heavily in yet another technology. The induction of sound recording in 1929 and mounting costs for producing films in the newly patented 3-strip Technicolor process had both proved expensive and crippling adjuncts to the fluidity that silent B&W nitrate filming had perfected.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrayals of Religious Studies in Popular Culture Brian Collins Ohio University
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected 2018 Faculty Bibliography Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage 6-2018 From Middlemarch to The aD Vinci Code: Portrayals of Religious Studies in Popular Culture Brian Collins Ohio University Kristen Tobey John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib_2018 Part of the Religion Commons, and the Television Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Brian and Tobey, Kristen, "From Middlemarch to The aD Vinci Code: Portrayals of Religious Studies in Popular Culture" (2018). 2018 Faculty Bibliography. 55. https://collected.jcu.edu/fac_bib_2018/55 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Bibliographies Community Homepage at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2018 Faculty Bibliography by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Middlemarch to The Da Vinci Code: Portrayals of Religious Studies in Popular Culture TEMPLE MIDDLEMARCH Directed by Michael Barrett Television serial Screen Media, 2017. 78 minutes Directed by Anthony Page BBC, 1994 DEXTER. SEASON SIX Created by James Manos Jr. MIDDLEMARCH: THE SERIES Showtime, 2011 Directed by Rebecca Shoptaw DEATH DU JOUR YouTube, 2017 By Kathy Reichs New York: Pocket Books, 1999 ANGELS & DEMONS Pp. 480. $17.19 By Dan Brown New York: Washington Square Press, 2006 [2000] THE BLACK TAPES Pp. 496. $17.00 Podcast. Created by Paul Bae and Terry Miles 2015–2017 THE DA VINCI CODE By Dan Brown. THE REAPING New York: Anchor Books, 2009 [2003] Directed by Stephen Hopkins Pp. 597. $9.99 Warner Brothers, 2007. 99 minutes THE LOST SYMBOL SINISTER By Dan Brown Directed by Scott Derickson New York: Anchor Books, 2012 [2009] Blumhouse Productions, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Square Vs Non-Square Pixels
    Square vs non-square pixels Adapted from: Flash + After Effects By Chris Jackson Square vs non square pixels can cause problems when exporting flash for TV and video if you get it wrong. Here Chris Jackson explains how best to avoid these mistakes... Before you adjust the Stage width and height, you need to be aware of the pixel aspect ratio. This refers to the width and height of each pixel that makes up an image. Computer screens display square pixels. Every pixel has an aspect ratio of 1:1. Video uses non-square rectangular pixels, actually scan lines. To make matters even more complicated, the pixel aspect ratio is not consistent between video formats. NTSC video uses a non-square pixel that is taller than it is wide. It has a pixel aspect ratio of 1:0.906. PAL is just the opposite. Its pixels are wider than they are tall with a pixel aspect ratio of 1:1.06. Figure 1: The pixel aspect ratio can produce undesirable image distortion if you do not compensate for the difference between square and non-square pixels. Flash only works in square pixels on your computer screen. As the Flash file migrates to video, the pixel aspect ratio changes from square to non-square. The end result will produce a slightly stretched image on your television screen. On NTSC, round objects will appear flattened. PAL stretches objects making them appear skinny. The solution is to adjust the dimensions of the Flash Stage. A common Flash Stage size used for NTSC video is 720 x 540 which is slightly taller than its video size of 720 x 486 (D1).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Widescreen Aspect Ratios
    HISTORY OF WIDESCREEN ASPECT RATIOS ACADEMY FRAME In 1889 Thomas Edison developed an early type of projector called a Kinetograph, which used 35mm film with four perforations on each side. The frame area was an inch wide and three quarters of an inch high, producing a ratio of 1.37:1. 1932 the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences made the Academy Ratio the standard Ratio, and was used in cinemas until 1953 when Paramount Pictures released Shane, produced with a Ratio of 1.66:1 on 35mm film. TELEVISION FRAME The standard analogue television screen ratio today is 1.33:1. The Aspect Ratio is the relationship between the width and height. A Ratio of 1.33:1 or 4:3 means that for every 4 units wide it is 3 units high (4 / 3 = 1.33). In the 1950s, Hollywood's attempt to lure people away from their television sets and back into cinemas led to a battle of screen sizes. Fred CINERAMA Waller of Paramount's Special Effects Department developed a large screen system called Cinerama, which utilised three cameras to record a single image. Three electronically synchronised projectors were used to project an image on a huge screen curved at an angle of 165 degrees, producing an aspect ratio of 2.8:1. This Is Cinerama was the first Cinerama film released in 1952 and was a thrilling travelogue which featured a roller-coaster ride. See Film Formats. In 1956 Metro Goldwyn Mayer was planning a CAMERA 65 ULTRA PANAVISION massive remake of their 1926 silent classic Ben Hur.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPECT RATIO Aspect Ratios Are One of the More Confusing Parts of Video
    ASPECT RATIO Aspect ratios are one of the more confusing parts of video, although they used to be simple. That's because television and movie content was all about the same size, 4:3 (also known as 1.33:1, meaning that the picture is 1.33 times as long as it is high). The Academy Standard before 1952 was 1.37:1, so there was virtually no problem showing movies on TV. However, as TV began to cut into Hollywood's take at the theater, the quest was on to differentiate theater offerings in ways that could not be seen on TV. Thus, innovations such as widescreen film, Technicolor, and even 3-D were born. Widescreen film was one of the innovations that survived and has since dominated the cinema. Today, you tend to find films in one of two widescreen aspect ratios: 1. Academy Standard (or "Flat"), which has an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 2. Anamorphic Scope (or "Scope"), which has an aspect ratio of 2.35:1. Scope is also called Panavision or CinemaScope. HDTV is specified at a 16:9, or 1.78:1, aspect ratio.If your television isn't widescreen and you want to watch a widescreen film, you have a problem. The most common approach in the past has been what's called Pan and Scan. For each frame o a film, a decision is made as to what constitutes the action area. That part of the film frame is retained, and the rest is lost.. This can often leave out the best parts of a picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents PART I. Introduction 5 A. Overview 5 B. Historical Background 6 PART II. The Study 16 A. Background 16 B. Independence 18 C. The Scope of the Monitoring 19 D. Methodology 23 1. Rationale and Definitions of Violence 23 2. The Monitoring Process 25 3. The Weekly Meetings 26 4. Criteria 27 E. Operating Premises and Stipulations 32 PART III. Findings in Broadcast Network Television 39 A. Prime Time Series 40 1. Programs with Frequent Issues 41 2. Programs with Occasional Issues 49 3. Interesting Violence Issues in Prime Time Series 54 4. Programs that Deal with Violence Well 58 B. Made for Television Movies and Mini-Series 61 1. Leading Examples of MOWs and Mini-Series that Raised Concerns 62 2. Other Titles Raising Concerns about Violence 67 3. Issues Raised by Made-for-Television Movies and Mini-Series 68 C. Theatrical Motion Pictures on Broadcast Network Television 71 1. Theatrical Films that Raise Concerns 74 2. Additional Theatrical Films that Raise Concerns 80 3. Issues Arising out of Theatrical Films on Television 81 D. On-Air Promotions, Previews, Recaps, Teasers and Advertisements 84 E. Children’s Television on the Broadcast Networks 94 PART IV. Findings in Other Television Media 102 A. Local Independent Television Programming and Syndication 104 B. Public Television 111 C. Cable Television 114 1. Home Box Office (HBO) 116 2. Showtime 119 3. The Disney Channel 123 4. Nickelodeon 124 5. Music Television (MTV) 125 6. TBS (The Atlanta Superstation) 126 7. The USA Network 129 8. Turner Network Television (TNT) 130 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Uncertainties (Prepared for Physics 15 and 17)
    Introduction to Uncertainties (prepared for physics 15 and 17) Average deviation. When you have repeated the same measurement several times, common sense suggests that your “best” result is the average value of the numbers. We still need to know how “good” this average value is. One measure is called the average deviation. The average deviation or “RMS deviation” of a data set is the average value of the absolute value of the differences between the individual data numbers and the average of the data set. For example if the average is 23.5cm/s, and the average deviation is 0.7cm/s, then the number can be expressed as (23.5 ± 0.7) cm/sec. Rule 0. Numerical and fractional uncertainties. The uncertainty in a quantity can be expressed in numerical or fractional forms. Thus in the above example, ± 0.7 cm/sec is a numerical uncertainty, but we could also express it as ± 2.98% , which is a fraction or %. (Remember, %’s are hundredths.) Rule 1. Addition and subtraction. If you are adding or subtracting two uncertain numbers, then the numerical uncertainty of the sum or difference is the sum of the numerical uncertainties of the two numbers. For example, if A = 3.4± .5 m and B = 6.3± .2 m, then A+B = 9.7± .7 m , and A- B = - 2.9± .7 m. Notice that the numerical uncertainty is the same in these two cases, but the fractional uncertainty is very different. Rule2. Multiplication and division. If you are multiplying or dividing two uncertain numbers, then the fractional uncertainty of the product or quotient is the sum of the fractional uncertainties of the two numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • 24P and Panasonic AG-DVX100 and AJ-SDX900 Camcorder Support in Vegas and DVD Architect Software
    ® 24p and Panasonic AG-DVX100 and AJ-SDX900 camcorder support in Vegas and DVD Architect Software Revision 3, Updated 05.27.04 The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Sony Pictures Digital Media Software and Services. The software described in this manual is provided under the terms of a license agreement or nondisclosure agreement. The software license agreement specifies the terms and conditions for its lawful use. Sound Forge, ACID, Vegas, DVD Architect, Vegas+DVD, Acoustic Mirror, Wave Hammer, XFX, and Perfect Clarity Audio are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sony Pictures Digital Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks or registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners in the United States and other countries. Copyright © 2004 Sony Pictures Digital Inc. This document can be reproduced for noncommercial reference or personal/private use only and may not be resold. Any reproduction in excess of 15 copies or electronic transmission requires the written permission of Sony Pictures Digital Inc. Table of Contents What is covered in this document? Background ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Vegas ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FILM FORMATS ------8 Mm Film Is a Motion Picture Film Format in Which the Filmstrip Is Eight Millimeters Wide
    FILM FORMATS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 mm film is a motion picture film format in which the filmstrip is eight millimeters wide. It exists in two main versions: regular or standard 8 mm and Super 8. There are also two other varieties of Super 8 which require different cameras but which produce a final film with the same dimensions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Standard 8 The standard 8 mm film format was developed by the Eastman Kodak company during the Great Depression and released on the market in 1932 to create a home movie format less expensive than 16 mm. The film spools actually contain a 16 mm film with twice as many perforations along each edge than normal 16 mm film, which is only exposed along half of its width. When the film reaches its end in the takeup spool, the camera is opened and the spools in the camera are flipped and swapped (the design of the spool hole ensures that this happens properly) and the same film is exposed along the side of the film left unexposed on the first loading. During processing, the film is split down the middle, resulting in two lengths of 8 mm film, each with a single row of perforations along one edge, so fitting four times as many frames in the same amount of 16 mm film. Because the spool was reversed after filming on one side to allow filming on the other side the format was sometime called Double 8. The framesize of 8 mm is 4,8 x 3,5 mm and 1 m film contains 264 pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Season 2016-2017
    23 Season 2016-2017 Friday, March 17, at 7:00 Saturday, March 18, at 7:00 The Philadelphia Orchestra Sunday, March 19, at 2:00 David Newman Conductor Paramount Pictures Presents A Lucasfilm Ltd. Production A Steven Spielberg Film in Concert Starring Harrison Ford Karen Allen Paul Freeman Ronald Lacey John Rhys-Davies Denholm Elliott Music by John Williams Executive Producers George Lucas and Howard Kazanjian Screenplay by Lawrence Kasdan Story by George Lucas and Philip Kaufman Produced by Frank Marshall Directed by Steven Spielberg Raiders of the Lost Ark licensed by Lucasfilm Ltd. and Paramount Pictures. This program licensed by Lucasfilm Ltd. and Paramount Pictures. Motion picture, artwork, photos © 1981 Lucasfilm Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Music written by John Williams, Bantha Music (BMI). All rights administered by Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. (BMI). All rights reserved. Used by permission. This program runs approximately 2 hours, 15 minutes. Philadelphia Orchestra concerts are broadcast on WRTI 90.1 FM on Sunday afternoons at 1 PM. Visit www.wrti.org to listen live or for more details. 25 PRODUCTION CREDITS Raiders of the Lost Ark—Film with Orchestra produced by Film Concerts Live!, a joint venture of IMG Artists, LLC, and the Gorfaine/Schwartz Agency, Inc. Producers: Steven A. Linder and Jamie Richardson Production Manager: Rob Stogsdill Production Coordinator: Rebekah Wood Worldwide Representation: IMG Artists, LLC Supervising Technical Director: Mike Runice Technical Director: Luke Dennis Music composed by John Williams Music Preparation: Jo Ann Kane Music Service Film Preparation for Concert Performance: Ramiro Belgardt Technical Consultant: Laura Gibson Sound Remixing for Concert Performance: Chace Audio by Deluxe The score for Raiders of the Lost Ark has been adapted for live concert performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Introduction This book consists of edited conversations between DP’s, Gaffer’s, their crew and equipment suppliers. As such it doesn’t have the same structure as a “normal” film reference book. Our aim is to promote the free exchange of ideas among fellow professionals, the cinematographer, their camera crew, manufacturer's, rental houses and related businesses. Kodak, Arri, Aaton, Panavision, Otto Nemenz, Clairmont, Optex, VFG, Schneider, Tiffen, Fuji, Panasonic, Thomson, K5600, BandPro, Lighttools, Cooke, Plus8, SLF, Atlab and Fujinon are among the companies represented. As we have grown, we have added lists for HD, AC's, Lighting, Post etc. expanding on the original professional cinematography list started in 1996. We started with one list and 70 members in 1996, we now have, In addition to the original list aimed soley at professional cameramen, lists for assistant cameramen, docco’s, indies, video and basic cinematography. These have memberships varying from around 1,200 to over 2,500 each. These pages cover the period November 1996 to November 2001. Join us and help expand the shared knowledge:- www.cinematography.net CML – The first 5 Years…………………………. Page 1 CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Page 2 CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Introduction................................................................ 1 Shooting at 25FPS in a 60Hz Environment.............. 7 Shooting at 30 FPS................................................... 17 3D Moving Stills......................................................
    [Show full text]