DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday, November 25, 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 037 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, November 25, 1997 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2141 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, November 25, 1997 The House met at 10 a.m. appropriation bills be used to legislate. This is a fundamental principle and one which the government wholeheartedly supports. _______________ I am not going to question that principle at all. I would just indicate that the point of order which the hon. member has made in fact Prayers does not apply in this case. _______________ The hon. member identifies five votes in which he claims that the government is seeking parliamentary approval of funds for D (1000) purposes for which Parliament has not yet given legislative author- [English] ity. I will argue that this is simply not the case in any of the five votes which have been mentioned. POINTS OF ORDER I can understand why the hon. member may have come to his MAIN ESTIMATES conclusion. The part IIIs explain the government’s plans for the next three years, not just the first year, 1997-98, which is the only Hon. Marcel Massé (President of the Treasury Board and subject of the appropriation bill. Minister responsible for Infrastructure, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise today to provide additional information to that provided by the In each of the five cases cited, the government has signalled its government House leader as to why the point of order raised by the intention to modify the way it does business. It has done this member for St. Albert is not a valid one. In no way do the estimates through tabling draft legislation for consideration by Parliament which are before the House derogate from or usurp the authority of and, as it undertook to do as part of the improved reporting to this House to adopt legislation, nor do they presuppose the will of Parliament project, it has done this by spelling out its plans in the this House in any way. part IIIs of the department concerned, not just for the main estimates here but for two additional years. D (1005) In being asked to approve supply legislation, Parliament is To begin with, I would like to commend the hon. member for St. requested to approve a series of specific votes. It is the wording of Albert on his continuing interest in the supply process and for the these votes that provides the legislative basis for the expenditures diligence of his research. He will recall, through his active of government. participation in the improved reporting to Parliament project, the initiatives that the government has taken in improving the informa- The previous Speakers’ rulings which the hon. member cited tion provided to parliamentarians over the last 12 months, initia- dealt with specific instances where this wording was considered tives in which the hon. member has been an active participant and inappropriate. That is not the case with the appropriation bill at which he has supported on two occasions in this House. issue here. In no case is the vote wording providing or seeking As part of the 1997-98 estimates process, the government additional authority that has not already been granted by Parlia- introduced modifications to part III of the estimates on a pilot basis ment. for 16 departments. These changes were intended to improve the In each of the five cases identified the funds sought through the quality of the information provided to Parliament and to provide estimates process are needed for continuing operations of the better information on strategic and future plans, as well as to lay programs concerned. If the legislation authorizing the operational the basis for providing performance information on a more timely changes is approved by Parliament, and only if, in each case, then basis. the funds will be spent in accordance with the new legislation. If It is in fact from the part IIIs for these pilot departments that the the enabling legislation is not adopted, then these same funds will hon. member has drawn most of the information he uses to support be spent in accordance with existing parliamentary authorities. his point of order. The part IIIs from which the hon. member draws his information The point of order is based broadly on the precept that the are all quite clear that they are dealing with future plans and in estimates should neither anticipate enabling legislation, nor should depicting any legislation at issue as proposed. 2142 COMMONS DEBATES November 25, 1997 Points of Order D (1010) has not been set aside, repealed or declared invalid by the government or by the court. [Translation] Part II of the estimates that I tabled earlier this year contained For example, part III states clearly, under Agriculture and two assurances. I will repeat both here again. Agri-Food Canada, and I quote: Individual expenditure proposals included in votes seek authority during the Priorities over the next three years include continuing reform of safety nets and 1997-98 fiscal year to make expenditures necessary to deliver various mandates grain policy. which are under the administration of a Minister and are contained in legislation approved by Parliament. Part III under the heading Environment Canada is equally clear: In light of the House of Commons Speaker’s ruling in 1981, the government has made a commitment that the only legislation that will be amended through the The proposed new CEPA, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, will result estimates process, other than cases specifically authorized by statute, will be in a more efficient process for categorizing toxic substances. previous appropriation acts. [English] D (1015 ) For the hon. member to argue that these votes be struck down on the basis that the government has provided specific details on its I think that in the estimates what we have done is have submitted future strategies is to argue that the government should retreat for the vote of the House expenditures which correspond exactly to under a veil of secrecy. That is precisely what we are trying to the wording of each vote. avoid as part of the improved reporting to Parliament project, a project that, I underline again, has received the hon. member’s The explanations given in part III, which once again are for three support, for which I both commend and thank him. future years, explained the plans of the government in case new legislation or new policies are adopted. In every one of the cases What a wonderful opportunity these documents provide. Parlia- mentioned by the hon. member for St. Albert, the expenditures that ment now has a three year planning horizon to help them under- are sought in supply are expenditures under the authority expressed stand the context within which new legislative proposals will properly by the wording of the votes. operate. I would go so far as to suggest that this level of future planning information and disclosure is probably unique among our The Speaker: Yesterday when the point of order was brought up fellow OECD countries. I permitted what was like a mini debate. This is new information which I have decided to hear. If there is anything else to be added, The situation is similar for the three items where the hon. if you are going to make an interjection you will get one shot at it. member claims that we are legislating through supply legislation. We are not going to go back and forth. Whatever you have to say on Again, this is simply not the case. this point of order I will listen to. I will then take all the information, retreat and make my own decision. Vote 35 for the Canadian International Trade Tribunal is simply for program expenditures. That is the wording of the vote. There is Mr. John Williams (St. Albert, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, I listened to nothing in these words that could possibly be construed as extend- the President of the Treasury Board with interest and I appreciated ing its mandate as the hon. member suggests. The vote is neither the compliments regarding the work we have done on the improved providing nor is it seeking new or additional authority. It is merely performance and reporting to Parliament. seeking supply. The point we want to make is that by the very definition of As the hon. member notes, the Canada Communications Group improved reporting to Parliament we are in command of better item is statutory. By definition, the amount shown is authorized by information in order for us to make appropriate decisions and vote legislation previously approved by Parliament and by that same according to the information laid before us. definition it is shown in the estimates or information as it does not form part of the appropriation bill that Parliament will be asked to I think the government and the estimates, especially the part IIIs, approve. It is statutory. have not provided that information to us or the minister is alleging that we are unable to discern from these part IIIs what monies are The final item with which the hon. member takes issue is the to be expended including the part IIs and what are for future years. Canada Information Office. The fact of the matter is that the order in council in question is presumed valid until repealed or set aside I have already written to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans by a court.
Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, October 1, 1997

    Wednesday, October 1, 1997

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 008 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, October 1, 1997 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the followingaddress: http://www.parl.gc.ca 323 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, October 1, 1997 The House met at 2 p.m. Columbians are crying out for federal leadership and this govern- ment is failing them miserably. _______________ Nowhere is this better displayed than in the Liberals’ misman- Prayers agement of the Pacific salmon dispute over the past four years. The sustainability of the Pacific salmon fishery is at stake and the _______________ minister of fisheries sits on his hands and does nothing except criticize his own citizens. D (1400) Having witnessed the Tory government destroy the Atlantic The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing fishery a few years ago, this government seems intent on doing the O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Souris— same to the Pacific fishery. Moose Mountain. It is a simple case of Liberal, Tory, same old incompetent story. [Editor’s Note: Members sang the national anthem] This government had better wake up to the concerns of British Columbians. A good start would be to resolve the crisis in the _____________________________________________ salmon fishery before it is too late. * * * STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS TOM EDWARDS [English] Ms. Judi Longfield (Whitby—Ajax, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the outstanding municipal career of Mr.
  • Calgary Declaration Page 2 Freedom Flyer 33 June? 1998 Eec£6Ac We Get Fetters

    Calgary Declaration Page 2 Freedom Flyer 33 June? 1998 Eec£6Ac We Get Fetters

    THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FREEDOM PARTY OF ONTARIO JUNE 1998 #33 Calgary Declaration Page 2 Freedom Flyer 33 June? 1998 eeC£6ac We get fetters ... Instead of bringing you our regular 'Openers' column this issue (which will return next issue), we thought we'd use this opportunity to let our readers do some of the talking, and to introduce you to a new regular feature of Freedom Flyer: Feedback. By no means exhaustive, the following selection of letters and e-mail represents a broad sampling of correspondence received by Freedom Pa~during the period January 1997 to May 1998. While many of these letters have already been personally responded to, others have not. Editorial responses, as they appear here, may be entirely new and/or edited versions of our original personal responses. To the greatest degree possible, original letters to Freedom Pa~ are left unedited, though there are exceptions with regard to length, structure and grammar (the latter applying particularly to e-mail and Usenet (news groups) correspondence). As always, we'd like to hear from you. Your comments, criticisms, suggestions, and occasional compliments are always welcomed. To contact Freedom Party, write: Box 2214, London, Ontario N6A 4E3, or fax us at (519) 681 -2857, or e-mail us at "feedback@freedomparty org". OJ NO DONATION up on freedom. To simply ignore the disastr· the text of Joe Armstrong's first-class ous consequences of drug prohibition and the speech to Kingston's Canadian Club. It's a Too bad you folks are still hung up on effect that such laws have on individual free· clarion call which, unfortunately, will not drugs! No donation.
  • Federal Spending Power: Practices, Principles, Perspectives

    Federal Spending Power: Practices, Principles, Perspectives

    Reflections on the Federal Spending Power: Practices, Principles, Perspectives Thomas J. Courchene IRPP Working Paper Series no. 2008-01 1470 Peel Suite 200 Montréal Québec H3A 1T1 514.985.2461 514.985.2559 fax www.irpp.org Reflections on the Federal Spending Power: Practices, Principles, Perspectives * Thomas J. Courchene ** I: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW1 The federal spending power (FSP) has returned to centre stage in public policy debates, in large part due to Stephen Harper’s call for “open federalism” replete with a commitment to respect the constitutional division of powers on the one hand and the subsequent Parliamentary proclamation that “the Québécois form a nation within a united Canada” on the other. Watts (1999,1) defines the spending power as “the power of Parliament to make payments to people, institutions or provincial governments for purposes on which Parliament does not necessarily have the power to legislate, for example, in areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction.” However, for the purposes of this paper the exercise of the federal spending power will be viewed more broadly and will encompass areas like federal regulation that can also affect the division of powers. In any event, the key issue here is that for Prime Minister Harper’s commitment to respect the constitutional division of powers to be credible it follows that the exercise of the federal spending power in selected areas must somehow be circumscribed. Not surprisingly, therefore, the October 2007 Speech from the Throne contained the following undertaking with respect to the narrower conception of the spending power: ...guided by our federalism of openness, our Government will introduce legislation to place formal limits on the use of the federal spending power for new shared-cost programs in areas of exclusive * This paper was prepared for the January 2008 symposium “Open Federalism and the Spending Power,” sponsored by Queen’s Law School and Queen’s Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.
  • Monday, September 28, 1998

    Monday, September 28, 1998

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 127 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, September 28, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 8431 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, September 28, 1998 The House met at 11 a.m. how taxpayers feel on certain issues, for example, the credibility of political leaders in negotiating these types of deals. _______________ Even though it is taxpayer money that is used to find out what the taxpayers feel about particular situations, they are not being Prayers told. They are not being given the information. We have some _______________ serious problems with that. This is very reminiscent of what happened with Brian Mulroney in 1992 when the Tories refused to release the taxpayer-funded PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS polls on Charlottetown. It begs the question of why this taxpayer money is being spent. Why are these polls being held back? Why D (1100 ) are we not being apprised of the situation? [English] It boils down to a few reasons. One of the things the government likes to say is that somehow this will taint federal-provincial CALGARY DECLARATION relations. That was decided in court by Judge Rothstein. I will get into the quotes in a minute. In that case there was a determination Mr. Rob Anders (Calgary West, Ref.) moved: that the government did not have a legitimate case to deprive the That a Humble Address be presented to His Excellency praying that he will cause public of these documents.
  • Constitutional Workarounds: Senate Reform and Other Examples

    Constitutional Workarounds: Senate Reform and Other Examples

    CONSTITUTIONAL WORKAROUNDS: SENATE REFORM AND OTHER EXAMPLES Robert E Hawkins* The process for amending Canada’s constitution is complex and difficult. As a result, “back door” routes for realizing change of a constitutional nature have been adopted. These “workarounds” include “formula shopping,” where amendment procedures requiring a lesser measure of provincial consent are adopted; ordinary legislation, where no provincial consent is sought at all; and hortatory declarations, where mere statements purport to define a government’s position with respect to particular constitutional issues. Workarounds in areas such as Senate reform, fixed date election laws, secession and clarity acts, and regional vetoes, along with declarations dealing with special status for Quebec, the federal spending power, and prorogation of Parliament, will be examined. Key to the constitutional validity of these workarounds is whether they bind the actions of relevant political actors, as opposed to being merely advisory or consultative. At stake is the interplay between two fundamental constitutional values: flexibility, which permits the constitution to adapt to changing societal realities; and federalism, which requires a meaningful degree of provincial consent for significant constitutional change. Il est difficile et complexe d’amender la constitution canadienne. C’est pourquoi, les modifications de nature constitutionnelle sont souvent effectuées par des moyens indirects. Ces “tactiques d’évitement” des difficultés constitutionnelles comprennent l’utilisation stratégique de procédures d’amendement qui requièrent un niveau d’appui provincial moindre; l’adoption de lois ordinaires, qui ne requièrent aucun appui provincial; et l’adoption par le Parlement de textes de nature déclaratoire, en vertu desquels le gouvernement tente de se positionner par rapport à un enjeu constitutionnel donné.
  • Chapter Sixteen

    Chapter Sixteen

    Ch a p t e r Si x t e e n National Unity Figure 16-1 Québec cartoonist Terry Mosher, also known as Aislin, drew this Figure 7-1cartoon In 1970, in 1990 Manitoba to show celebrated his opinion its 100th anniversary of enteringof the into way Confederation. constitutional As debates part of hadthat celebration, in 1971 a statueaffected (below) Canadian of Métis unity. leader Louis Riel was unveiled on the grounds of the Manitoba Legislature in Winnipeg. In the following years, controversies erupted over the statue; over Riel’s naked and contorted figure, and over the role Riel played in the time leading up to Manitoba’s entrance into Confederation and beyond. In 1995, the statue was removed from the grounds of the legislature to Collège universitaire de Saint-Boniface and was replaced on the grounds of the legislature by another statue (left). The removal and replacement of the original statue caused a controversy of its own. Figure 16-2 In 1995, just days before Québec held a referendum on whether to separate from Canada, thousands of Canadians from across the country descended on Montréal to tell Québec that they wanted the province to stay united with Canada. image P7-39 460 CLUSTER 5 • Defining Contemporary Canada (1982 to present) • MHR How has the question of national unity influenced federalism, constitutional debate, and political change? To explore this essentialEssential question,Question, you you will will KEY TERMS • examine the issues,attempts events, to have and Québec people signthat theshaped Canadian the history ofConstitution
  • Schools, Signs, and Separation: Quebec Anglophones, Canadian Constitutional Politics, and International Language Rights

    Schools, Signs, and Separation: Quebec Anglophones, Canadian Constitutional Politics, and International Language Rights

    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 27 Number 3 Summer Article 4 May 2020 Schools, Signs, and Separation: Quebec Anglophones, Canadian Constitutional Politics, and International Language Rights William Green Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation William Green, Schools, Signs, and Separation: Quebec Anglophones, Canadian Constitutional Politics, and International Language Rights, 27 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 449 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SCHOOLS, SIGNS, AND SEPARATION: QUEBEC ANGLOPHONES, CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, AND INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE RIGHTS WILLIAM GREEN* I. INTRODUCTION Contemporary Canadian politics has been defined by Quebec's vi- sion of the province as a linguistically distinct society and by its 1980 and 1995 sovereignty referendums.' Quebec's rejection of Canada as a bilingual nation, embodied in the 1982 Charter of Rights and Free- doms, 2 and Canada's obsession with keeping Quebec in Canada have, however, left unexamined the impact of the province's language policies on its anglophone minority. In Quebec, the enactment of the Charter of the French Language 3 and the government's promotion of a French cul- ture have intruded upon the Canadian Charter freedom of its anglo- phones to conduct their business in English and their Canadian Char- ter right to have their children educated in English.4 In response, the * William Green, Professor of Government, Morehead State University; J.D., University of Kentucky, 1984; Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo, 1977; and M.A.
  • Wednesday, December 6, 1995

    Wednesday, December 6, 1995

    CANADA VOLUME 133 S NUMBER 272 S 1st SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, December 6, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates and the Proceedings of Committee evidence are accessible on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 17271 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, December 6, 1995 The House met at 2 p.m. ment’s constitutional veto to provincial governments rather than the people, the government will pit one province against the _______________ others. Prayers The net effect of the government’s package is to increase inequality. Without a doubt, denying all citizens constitutional _______________ equality will entrench the notion that all Canadians are unequal. The Speaker: As is our custom, we will be led today in the My constituents in Edmonton—Strathcona and I support the singing of the national anthem by the hon. member for Kootenay Reform’s blue book policy which states clearly our commitment East. to Canada as one nation and to our vision of Canada as a [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national an- balanced federation of 10 equal provinces and citizens. them.] * * * _____________________________________________ SRI LANKA STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Ms. Colleen Beaumier (Brampton, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, Sri Lanka is a country consumed in violence by the ongoing conflict [English] between the Sri Lankan army and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. Since 1983, 50,000 people have been killed and another NATIONAL SAFE DRIVING WEEK 500,000 Tamils have been forced into exile.
  • The Politics of Asymmetrical Federalism: Reconsidering the Role and Responsibilities of Ottawa Author(S): Kathy L

    The Politics of Asymmetrical Federalism: Reconsidering the Role and Responsibilities of Ottawa Author(S): Kathy L

    Canadian Public Policy The Politics of Asymmetrical Federalism: Reconsidering the Role and Responsibilities of Ottawa Author(s): Kathy L. Brock Reviewed work(s): Source: Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Jun., 2008), pp. 143-161 Published by: University of Toronto Press on behalf of Canadian Public Policy Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25463605 . Accessed: 02/10/2012 16:46 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Toronto Press and Canadian Public Policy are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques. http://www.jstor.org The Politics of Asymmetrical Federalism: Reconsidering the Role and Responsibilities of Ottawa Kathy L. Brock School of Policy Studies and Department of Political Studies Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Dans cet article, je soutiens que, s'il est souhaitable et meme n6cessaire que les diverses composantes de toute federation concluent des arrangements asymetriques, au Canada, depuis plusieurs ann6es, les empifctements du gouvernement federal sur les competences des provinces ont graduellement suscite un r6flexe protecteur dans les provinces, et que cela a entrain^ une multiplication des ententes reconnaissant les differences provinciales.
  • Core 1..176 Hansard

    Core 1..176 Hansard

    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 142 Ï NUMBER 082 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, April 18, 2008 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5099 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, April 18, 2008 The House met at 10 a.m. It is important to keep this in mind. We have to remember that these provisions and ones similar to them in many other countries grew out of the period immediately following the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, a period when all of us Prayers were concerned for our security and anxious and fearful. Ï (1005) There are two major provisions in the bill before us, one for investigative hearings and the other for preventive detention. These [Translation] were part of the Anti-terrorism Act that was passed in the period POINT OF ORDER immediately following September 11, 2001. In that original legislation, these particular provisions sunsetted after five years. COMMENTS BY MEMBER FOR HOCHELAGA Mr. Réal Ménard (Hochelaga, BQ): Mr. Speaker, yesterday Under the terms of the sunset clause, the provisions of the Anti- during members' statements, I spoke without thinking when I terrorism Act relating to investigative hearings and recognizance described the government's unfair assessment of the actions of the with conditions were set to expire on March 1, 2007 unless extended Bloc Québécois regarding justice matters. I used some language that by a resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament.
  • Friday, November 7, 1997

    Friday, November 7, 1997

    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 030 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 7, 1997 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1695 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 7, 1997 The House met at 10 a.m. telecommunication and, for that purpose, section 487.1 applies, with any modifications that the circumstances require, to the warrant or authorization.’’ _______________ He said: Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak to this amendment with some regret that we are in this situation. We are facing a problem Prayers within the Department of Justice when important amendments are _______________ being made to the Criminal Code that for all intents and purposes are being ramrodded through at the committee level and through the House. GOVERNMENT ORDERS As a result of the supreme court decision in the Queen v Feeney, D (1000) the Department of Justice was faced with a situation in which it had to fill a gap that had been left by the supreme court when it struck [English] down sections of the Criminal Code that pertained to the powers of arrest. CRIMINAL CODE The House proceeded to the consideration of Bill C-16, an act to What has happened here is akin to the trampling on the right of amend the Criminal Code and the Interpretation Act (powers to Parliament to actively and in a substantive way participate in the arrest and enter dwelling), as reported (with amendment) from the debate and the process to make recommendations as they pertain to committee.
  • Document on Québec's Positions on Constitutional And

    Document on Québec's Positions on Constitutional And

    TIMETABLE QUÉBEC'S POSITIONS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES FROM 1936 TO MARCH 2001 1864 Charlottetown and Québec 1948 The Fleur-de-lys flag officially Conferences for a project to becomes the flag of Québec. unite the British colonies of North America. 1949 Entry of Newfoundland into the Canadian federation. 1867 Birth of the Canadian federa- tion. The federation then had Abolition of appeals to the four provinces: Québec, Ontario, Judicial Committee of the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Privy Council in London. 1870 The federal Parliament creates 1951 Constitutional amendment the Northwest Territories. regarding old-age pensions. Manitoba becomes the fifth 1954 Québec income tax. Canadian province. 1956 Report of the Royal Commis- 1871 British Columbia enters the sion of Inquiry on Constitu- Canadian federation. tional Problems (Tremblay 1873 Prince Edward Island enters Commission, Québec). the Canadian federation. 1964 Constitutional amendment 1875 Creation of the Supreme Court regarding old-age pensions of Canada by the federal and additional benefits. Parliament. 1965 Preliminary report of the Royal 1898 Creation of the Yukon Territory Commission on Bilingualism by the federal Parliament. and Biculturalism (Laurendeau- 1905 Alberta and Saskatchewan Dunton Commission, federal). becomes the eighth and the ninth Canadian provinces. 1966 Québec refuses to accept the procedure for constitutional 1914-1918 The First World War. amendment, thereafter re- 1926 The Balfour Declaration on ferred to as the “Fulton-Favreau the status of the Dominions of Formula.” the British Empire. 1967 Interprovincial “Confederation of 1931 Statute of Westminster: confir- Tomorrow” Conference, Toronto, mation of Canada’s accession November 27 to 30, 1967. to independence.