DOCSLIB.ORG

MM Colour Techreport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MM Colour Techreport Biodiversity Action Plan Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project July 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Biodiversity290039 EVT ActionEMS 01Plan A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 1 November 2012 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project July 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC 1. Abashidze Street 6, 6010 Batumi, Georgia Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom t +44 (0)1223 463500 f +44 (0)1223 461007, www.mottmac.com Biodiversity Action Plan Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 2/11/2012 Celia Figueira Vanessa Hovland Caroline McParland Draft for client review Mihai Coroi Tristan Folland Róisín Ní Mhathúna B 29/11/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Draft Report C 11/12/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Report D 19/07/2013 Mihai Coroi Iain Bray Lucy Morton Revised Report with IFC comments addressed (draft for client review) E 22/07/2013 Mark Barnard Lucy Morton Lucy Morton Revised report with IFC comments addressed (for issue) This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which used for any other purpose. is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. 290039/TRD/EFR/BAP/01/E 22 July 2013 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 Biodiversity Action Plan Content Chapter Title Page 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project _______________________________________________________ 1 1.1.1 Overview __________________________________________________________________________ 1 1.1.2 Project Description __________________________________________________________________ 2 1.2 Why is the Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project BAP Needed? ___________________________________ 5 1.3 Structure of this report _______________________________________________________________ 5 2. Scope of the Adjaristsqali Hydropower BAP 6 2.1 Aims and Objectives of the BAP ________________________________________________________ 6 2.2 Formulation of the Project BAP _________________________________________________________ 7 2.3 Consultation with Stakeholders and Biodiversity Experts _____________________________________ 8 2.3.1 Overview __________________________________________________________________________ 8 2.3.2 Stakeholder Categorisation ____________________________________________________________ 8 2.3.3 Stakeholder Influence/Interest Analysis _________________________________________________ 10 2.4 Study Area _______________________________________________________________________ 11 3. Legal, Regulatory, Planning and Third Party Requirements 13 3.1 Legal and Regulatory Requirements ____________________________________________________ 13 3.1.1 International Legislation and Policy _____________________________________________________ 13 3.1.2 European Union (EU) Legislation and Policy _____________________________________________ 13 3.1.3 National Legislative and Policy Framework_______________________________________________ 14 3.2 Planning and Permitting Requirements __________________________________________________ 17 3.2.1 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ____________________________________________ 17 3.3 AGL’s Environmental and Social Sustainability Policy ______________________________________ 20 3.4 Third Party Requirements ____________________________________________________________ 20 3.4.1 Overview _________________________________________________________________________ 20 3.4.2 International Finance Corporation (IFC) Standards and Guidance _____________________________ 20 3.4.3 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Standards _______________________ 21 3.4.4 Asian Development Bank (ADB) Standards ______________________________________________ 22 4. Biodiversity Baseline 23 4.1 General Approach and Methodology ___________________________________________________ 23 4.1.1 Desktop Study _____________________________________________________________________ 23 4.1.2 Field surveys ______________________________________________________________________ 24 4.1.2.1 Overview _________________________________________________________________________ 24 4.1.2.2 Vegetation and Floristic Surveys _______________________________________________________ 24 4.1.2.3 Bird Surveys ______________________________________________________________________ 25 4.1.2.4 Mammal Surveys __________________________________________________________________ 25 4.1.2.5 Reptile & Amphibian Surveys _________________________________________________________ 25 4.1.2.6 Fish and Zoo-benthos Surveys and Interviews ____________________________________________ 25 4.1.2.7 River Habitat Surveys _______________________________________________________________ 26 4.2 Ecoregions and Biodiversity Hotspots ___________________________________________________ 26 4.3 Protected and Nature Conservation Areas _______________________________________________ 27 4.3.1 Kintrishi Nature Reserve and Important Bird Area _________________________________________ 27 4.3.2 Machakhela National Park ___________________________________________________________ 28 290039/TRD/EFR/BAP/01/E 22 July 2013 http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 Biodiversity Action Plan 4.3.3 Mtirala National Park ________________________________________________________________ 28 4.3.4 Batumi Important Bird Area ___________________________________________________________ 29 4.3.5 Adjara-Imereti Ridge Important Bird Area ________________________________________________ 29 4.3.6 Shavsheti Ridge Important Bird Area ___________________________________________________ 29 4.3.7 Key Biodiversity Areas ______________________________________________________________ 29 4.4 Habitats __________________________________________________________________________ 29 4.4.1 Overview _________________________________________________________________________ 29 4.4.2 Main Habitats _____________________________________________________________________ 31 4.4.2.1 Shuakhevi Scheme _________________________________________________________________ 31 4.4.2.2 Koromkheti Scheme ________________________________________________________________ 32 4.4.2.3 Western Part of Study Area __________________________________________________________ 32 4.5 Flora ____________________________________________________________________________ 33 4.6 Birds ____________________________________________________________________________ 38 4.7 Mammals ________________________________________________________________________ 40 4.8 Reptiles and Amphibians ____________________________________________________________ 43 4.9 Fish _____________________________________________________________________________ 44 4.10 Invertebrates and Algae _____________________________________________________________ 46 5. Critical Habitat Assessment 47 5.1 Background Information _____________________________________________________________ 47 5.2 Determination of Critical Habitat _______________________________________________________ 47 5.2.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 47 5.2.2 Critically endangered and/or endangered species at global and/or national level _________________ 48 5.2.3 Endemic and/or restricted-range species ________________________________________________ 52 5.2.4 Migratory and/or congregatory species __________________________________________________ 54 5.2.5 Legally protected and internationally recognised areas _____________________________________ 54 5.2.6 Critical habitat trigger features ________________________________________________________ 55 5.3 Critical habitat impacts and project requirements __________________________________________ 56 5.3.1 Overview _________________________________________________________________________ 56 5.3.2 Critically endangered and/or endangered species at global and national level ____________________ 57 5.3.3 Endemic and/or restricted range species ________________________________________________ 58 5.3.4 Migratory and/or congregatory species __________________________________________________ 59 5.3.5 Legally protected and internationally recognised areas _____________________________________ 59 6. Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation 60 6.1 Selection criteria ___________________________________________________________________ 60 6.2 Priorities _________________________________________________________________________ 60 6.2.1 Habitats __________________________________________________________________________ 60 6.2.2 Species __________________________________________________________________________ 61 6.2.2.1 Plant species of conservation importance in Adjara, Georgia and Caucasus _____________________ 61 6.2.2.2 Mammal species of Georgian and/or global conservation importance __________________________ 61 6.2.2.3 Bird species of global and national importance ____________________________________________ 62 6.2.2.4 Globally and nationally threatened species of reptiles and amphibians _________________________ 62 6.2.2.5 Fish
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Ser Oliver Uordropi 150
    saqarTvelos parlamentis erovnuli biblioTeka saqarTvelos erovnuli arqivi ser oliver uordropi 150 Tbilisi 2015 1 UDC (uak) 001 (410)(092) 008.1 (479.22.410) wigni Seadgina, SeniSvnebi da komentarebi daurTo, redaqtireba gaukeTa, inglisuri teqsti qarTul Targmans Seudara istoriis doqtorma: beqa kobaxiZem teqsti inglisuridan qarTul enaze Targmna: salome beniZem qarTuli Targmanis stilisturi redaqtireba diana anfimiadisa wina ydaze gamosaxulia saqarTvelos sagareo saqmeTa ministri - evgeni gegeWkori da didi britaneTis umaRlesi komisari - ser oliver uordropi tfilisSi 1919 wlis 30 agvistos mowyobil daxvedraze. foto daculia saqarTvelos erovnul arqivSi. On the front cover there are illustrated Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia – Evgeni Gegechkori and British High Commissioner in Transcaucasia – Sir Oliver Wardrop at the arrival meeting of Wardrop in Tiflis on 30th of August 1919. The photograph is preserved in the National Archives of Georgia. ukana ydaze gamosaxulia ser oliver uordropi - misi udidebulesobis generaluri konsuli strasburgSi. 1925 weli. foto hilari grandis uordropebis ojaxis albomidan. On the back cover there is illustrated Sir Oliver Wardrop – His Majesty’s Consul-General in Strasbourg. 1925. Photograph from Wardrops family album of Hilary Grundy. © saqarTvelos parlamentis erovnuli biblioTeka © saqarTvelos erovnuli arqivi Sps “irida” rusTavi, firosmanis q.#7 ISBN 978-9941-0-8216-0 2 sarCevi: redaqtoris winasityvaoba ...............................................................................................4 “ser oliver uordropi:
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Muroid Rodents Driven by the Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2018 Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling Nelish Pradhan University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Pradhan, Nelish, "Diversification Of Muroid Rodents Driven By The Late Miocene Global Cooling" (2018). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 907. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/907 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIVERSIFICATION OF MUROID RODENTS DRIVEN BY THE LATE MIOCENE GLOBAL COOLING A Dissertation Presented by Nelish Pradhan to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Biology May, 2018 Defense Date: January 8, 2018 Dissertation Examination Committee: C. William Kilpatrick, Ph.D., Advisor David S. Barrington, Ph.D., Chairperson Ingi Agnarsson, Ph.D. Lori Stevens, Ph.D. Sara I. Helms Cahan, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT Late Miocene, 8 to 6 million years ago (Ma), climatic changes brought about dramatic floral and faunal changes. Cooler and drier climates that prevailed in the Late Miocene led to expansion of grasslands and retreat of forests at a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoacanthocephalus
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Smales, Lesley R and Allain, Steven J. R. and Wilkinson, John W. and Harris, Eileen (2020) A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, with comments on the implications of the introductions of toads and their parasites into the UK. Journal of Helminthology, 94 . DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/80268/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Journal of Helminthology A new species of Pseudoacanthocephalus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from cambridge.org/jhl the guttural toad, Sclerophrys gutturalis (Bufonidae), introduced into Mauritius, Research Paper with comments on the implications of the Cite this article: Smales LR, Allain SJR, Wilkinson JW, Harris E (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic History of the Yellow-Necked Fieldmouse
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32 (2004) 788–798 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeographic history of the yellow-necked fieldmouse (Apodemus flavicollis) in Europe and in the Near and Middle East J.R. Michaux,a,b,* R. Libois,a E. Paradis,b and M.-G. Filippuccic a Unite de Recherches Zoogeographiques, Institut de Zoologie, Quai Van Beneden, 22, 4020 Liege, Belgium b Laboratoire de Paleontologie-cc064, Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (UMR 5554-CNRS), Universite Montpellier II, Place E. Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier Cedex 05, France c Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita di Roma ‘‘Tor Vergata’’ Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy Received 25 July 2003; revised 3 February 2004 Available online 15 April 2004 Abstract The exact location of glacial refugia and the patterns of postglacial range expansion of European mammals are not yet com- pletely elucidated. Therefore, further detailed studies covering a large part of the Western Palearctic region are still needed. In this order, we sequenced 972 bp of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b (mtDNA cyt b) from 124 yellow-necked fieldmice (Apodemus flavicollis) collected from 53 European localities. The aims of the study were to answer the following questions: • Did the Mediterranean peninsulas act as the main refuge for yellow-necked fieldmouse or did the species also survive in more easterly refugia (the Caucasus or the southern Ural) and in Central Europe? • What is the role of Turkey and Near East regions as Quaternary glacial refuges for this species and as a source for postglacial recolonisers of the Western Palearctic region? The results provide a clear picture of the impact of the quaternary glaciations on the genetic and geographic structure of the fieldmouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment – Part 6 Project Number: 47919 April 2014 GEO: Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project Prepared by Mott MacDonald and Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity Action Plan Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Biodiversity290039 EVT Action EMS 01Plan A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 1 November 2012 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC 1. Abashidze Street 6, 6010 Batumi, Georgia Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom t +44 (0)1223 463500 f +44 (0)1223 461007, www.mottmac.com Biodiversity Action Plan Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 2/11/2012 Celia Figueira Vanessa Hovland Caroline McParland Draft for client review Mihai Coroi Tristan Folland Róisín Ní Mhathúna B 29/11/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Draft
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Evolution of Carnivory Among Indo-Australian Rodents
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12871 Repeated evolution of carnivory among Indo-Australian rodents Kevin C. Rowe,1,2 Anang S. Achmadi,3 and Jacob A. Esselstyn4,5 1Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Australia 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Research Center for Biology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Cibinong, Jawa Barat, Indonesia 4Museum of Natural Science, 119 Foster Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 5Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 Received February 1, 2015 Accepted January 12, 2016 Convergent evolution, often observed in island archipelagos, provides compelling evidence for the importance of natural selection as a generator of species and ecological diversity. The Indo-Australian Archipelago (IAA) is the world’s largest island system and encompasses distinct biogeographic units, including the Asian (Sunda) and Australian (Sahul) continental shelves, which together bracket the oceanic archipelagos of the Philippines and Wallacea. Each of these biogeographic units houses numerous endemic rodents in the family Muridae. Carnivorous murids, that is those that feed on animals, have evolved independently in Sunda, Sulawesi (part of Wallacea), the Philippines, and Sahul, but the number of origins of carnivory among IAA murids is unknown. We conducted a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of carnivorous murids of the IAA, combined with estimates of ancestral states for broad diet categories (herbivore, omnivore, and carnivore) and geographic ranges. These analyses demonstrate that carnivory evolved independently four times after overwater colonization, including in situ origins on the Philippines, Sulawesi, and Sahul. In each biogeographic unit the origin of carnivory was followed by evolution of more specialized carnivorous ecomorphs such as vermivores, insectivores, and amphibious rats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasian Toad, Bufo Verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) in the Levant: Evidence from Mitochondrial DNA
    Herpetozoa 32: 255–258 (2019) DOI 10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e37560 The Caucasian Toad, Bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) in the Levant: evidence from mitochondrial DNA Daniel Jablonski1, Riyad A. Sadek2 1 Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 6, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia 2 Department of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon http://zoobank.org/017F0D1F-7467-43A9-9D7C-46335D293038 Corresponding author: Daniel Jablonski ([email protected]) Academic editor: Günter Gollmann ♦ Received 20 June 2019 ♦ Accepted 5 October 2019 ♦ Published 29 October 2019 Abstract We present the first molecular analysis of the Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) complex population in the Levant. This complex contains four species distributed through the Western Palearctic. Based on the analysis of the widely used mitochondrial marker 16S rRNA, populations from the Levant belong to B. verrucosissimus (Pallas, 1814) and have a close affiliation to populations from the Trans- caucasian region rather than southern Turkey. Such identified relationships may imply past rapid colonisation from north to south and support the need for further research. Key Words common toad, Bufonidae, mtDNA, biogeography, taxonomy, Middle East The Caucasian Toad, Bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas, western and southern Turkey (García-Porta et al. 2012; 1814), is a member of the Western Palearctic B. bufo (Lin- Arntzen et al. 2013). naeus, 1758) complex along with three other species: B. Although information about B. bufo complex in the bufo, B. eichwaldi and B. spinosus (García-Porta et al. Levant region (Syria, Lebanon) is absent in recent phylo- 2012; Recuero et al. 2012; Arntzen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus Globalization
    Volume 3 Issue 4 2009 1 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION INSTITUTE O STRATEGIC STUDIES O THE CAUCASUS THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Volume 3 Issue 4 2009 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 2 Volume 3 Issue 4 2009 OUNDEDTHE CAUCASUS AND& GLOBALIZATION PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE O STRATEGIC STUDIES O THE CAUCASUS Registration number: M-770 Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press® Sweden Registration number: 556699-5964 Registration number of the journal: 1218 Editorial Council Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council (Baku) ISMAILOV Tel/fax: (994 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Kenan Executive Secretary (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Azer represents the journal in Russia (Moscow) SAFAROV Tel: (7 495) 937 77 27 E-mail: [email protected] Nodar represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi) KHADURI Tel: (995 32) 99 59 67 E-mail: [email protected] Ayca represents the journal in Turkey (Ankara) ERGUN Tel: (+90 312) 210 59 96 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Nazim Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) MUZAFFARLI Tel: (994 – 12) 499 11 74 E-mail: [email protected] (IMANOV) Vladimer Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Georgia) PAPAVA Tel: (995 – 32) 24 35 55 E-mail: [email protected] Akif Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) ABDULLAEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 3 IssueMembers 4 2009 of Editorial Board: 3 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Zaza Doctor of History, professor, Corresponding member of the Georgian National Academy ALEKSIDZE of Sciences, head of the scientific department of the Korneli Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts (Georgia) Mustafa Professor, Ankara University (Turkey) AYDIN Irina D.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan of Georgia
    Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan - Georgia – Tbilisi, 2005 Foreword Georgia signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1994, thus accepting responsibility to safeguard the nation’s rich diversity of plant, animal, and microbial life, to begin using biological resources in sustainable way, and to ensure equitable sharing of benefits from biodiversity. Later the country joined other conventions including the Convention on Climate Change, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, CITES and the Bonn Convention. As a signatory to these important international environmental treaties, Georgia enters the world scene with the potential for joining the most advanced nations in the field of environmental protection. At the present moment of transition, Georgia has a unique opportunity to use the early experiences of other countries, and avoid irreversible changes in the quality of its environment. The national legislation on environmental protection adopted over the past few years provides an adequate legal basis for this, although further elaboration and reinforcement of the existing legislation is needed. With the Ministry of Environment being currently reorganised and assuming broader responsibilities, Georgia’s institutional arrangements for environmental protection already has the necessary structure for improving the quality of the environment throughout the country. The role of non-governmental groups has been very important in resolving problems related to nature conservation. Georgia has shown an excellent example of co-operation between governmental and non-governmental organizations in the field of environment, and particularly in the field of biodiversity conservation. After signing the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Georgian Government immediately acted to develop a Biodiversity Country Study, in partnership with UNEP, and implemented by NACRES, a local conservation organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of War Prospects for Peace
    Georgian Orthodox Church Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung CAUSES OF WAR PROS P E C TS FOR PEA C E Tbilisi, 2009 1 On December 2-3, 2008 the Holy Synod of the Georgian Orthodox Church and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung held a scientific conference on the theme: Causes of War - Prospects for Peace. The main purpose of the conference was to show the essence of the existing conflicts in Georgia and to prepare objective scientific and information basis. This book is a collection of conference reports and discussion materials that on the request of the editorial board has been presented in article format. Publishers: Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Katia Christina Plate Bidzina Lebanidze Nato Asatiani Editorial board: Archimandrite Adam (Akhaladze), Tamaz Beradze, Rozeta Gujejiani, Roland Topchishvili, Mariam Lordkipanidze, Lela Margiani, Tariel Putkaradze, Bezhan Khorava Reviewers: Zurab Tvalchrelidze Revaz Sherozia Giorgi Cheishvili Otar Janelidze Editorial board wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Irina Bibileishvili, Merab Gvazava, Nia Gogokhia, Ekaterine Dadiani, Zviad Kvilitaia, Giorgi Cheishvili, Kakhaber Tsulaia. ISBN 2345632456 Printed by CGS ltd 2 Preface by His Holiness and Beatitude Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia ILIA II; Opening Words to the Conference 5 Preface by Katja Christina Plate, Head of the Regional Office for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Opening Words to the Conference 8 Abkhazia: Historical-Political and Ethnic Processes Tamaz Beradze, Konstantine Topuria, Bezhan Khorava - A
    [Show full text]