DOCSLIB.ORG

Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Preliminary Options Appraisal Report Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Preliminary Options Appraisal Report Final Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Preliminary Options Appraisal Report Final On behalf of Nestrans, Aberdeenshire Council and Aberdeen City Council Project Ref: 47533 | Rev: ES | Date: January 2021 Registered Office: Buckingham Court Kingsmead Business Park, London Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 1JU Office Address: 3rd Floor, Randolph House, 4 Charlotte Street, Edinburgh EH2 4QZ T: +44 (0)131 297 7010 E: info.edinburgh@stantec Preliminary Options Appraisal Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Document Control Sheet Project Name: Aberdeen City Regional Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Project Ref: 47533 Report Title: Preliminary Options Appraisal Date: 29th January 2021 Name Position Signature Date Associate Transport Prepared by: Emily Seaman ES / SR 04/02/2020 Planners Director, Transport Reviewed by: Scott Leitham SL 04/02/2020 Planning Director, Transport Approved by: Scott Leitham SL 04/02/2020 Planning For and on behalf of Stantec Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved 1 17/01/2020 First Draft ES SL SL 2 04/02/2020 Second Draft ES SL SL 3 17/04/2020 Third Draft ES SL SL 4 29/05/2020 Fourth Draft ES SL SL 5 11/06/2020 Fifth Draft ES SL SL 6 15/06/2020 Sixth Draft ES SL SL 7 29/01/2021 Seventh Draft (post-Consultation) ES SL SL This document entitled Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal – Preliminary Options Appraisal of Regional Transport Projects was prepared by Stantec for the account of Nestrans (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. ii Preliminary Options Appraisal Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 10 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 24 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 24 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................. 24 1.3 COVID-19 .................................................................................................................... 25 2 Updated Policy Environment ................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 27 2.2 National Level .............................................................................................................. 27 2.3 Regional Level ............................................................................................................. 28 2.4 Local Level .................................................................................................................. 29 2.5 Projects ........................................................................................................................ 31 2.6 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 33 3 Initial Appraisal: Case for Change – Summary ...................................................................... 35 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 35 3.2 Problems, Opportunities and Objectives ..................................................................... 35 3.3 Option Generation and Sifting ..................................................................................... 37 4 Transport Planning Objectives ................................................................................................ 46 4.1 Transport Planning Objectives – Case for Change ..................................................... 46 4.2 Transport Planning Objectives – Draft National Transport Strategy ........................... 46 4.3 Transport Planning Objectives – RTS2040 ................................................................. 47 4.4 Revising the Study TPOs ............................................................................................ 47 5 Option Development ................................................................................................................. 52 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 52 5.2 Review of the options .................................................................................................. 52 5.3 Review of Strategic and Policy Landscape Changes .................................................. 53 5.4 Strategic Corridors....................................................................................................... 55 5.5 Option Development Workshop .................................................................................. 57 5.6 Option Consolidation ................................................................................................... 58 6 Option Appraisal Context ......................................................................................................... 71 6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 71 6.2 Regional Overview ...................................................................................................... 71 6.3 Strategic Corridor Analysis .......................................................................................... 78 6.4 Corridor Audit .............................................................................................................. 85 7 Option Appraisal (Preliminary Appraisal) ............................................................................... 99 7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 99 7.2 Options: 1- 4: Active Travel ....................................................................................... 101 7.3 Option 5: Improve bus services and network ............................................................ 111 7.4 Option 6: Demand Responsive Transport Services .................................................. 119 iii Preliminary Options Appraisal Aberdeen City Region Deal – Strategic Transport Appraisal 7.5 Option 7: New railway stations on existing lines ....................................................... 123 7.6 Option 8: New railway lines and associated stations ................................................ 130 7.7 Option 9: Strategic Public Transport Corridor Scheme ............................................. 139 7.8 Option 10: Park & Ride Facility at Portlethen ............................................................ 151 7.9 Option 11: Improved Transport Hub .......................................................................... 156 7.10 Option 12: Improved Integrated Ticketing ................................................................. 160 7.11 Option 13: Improved marketing and information about Public Transport services ... 165 7.12 Option 14: Access for All across all public transport (including taxi) modes ............. 169 7.13 Options 15 – 17: Strategic Trunk Road Improvements ............................................. 173 7.14 Options 18 – 21: Regional Road Improvements ....................................................... 180 7.15 Option 22: Long Term Asset Management strategy ................................................. 185 7.16 Option 23: Community road safety measures ........................................................... 190 7.17 Option 24: Low / Zero Emission Zones ..................................................................... 197 7.18 Option 25: Electric Vehicle and Hydrogen vehicles .................................................. 205 7.19 Option 26: Enhance network monitoring capability ................................................... 212 7.20 Option 27: Congestion Zone Charging ...................................................................... 217 7.21 Option 28: Parking Demand Management ................................................................ 225 7.22 Option 29: Improve Inter-City Rail Connections ........................................................ 233 7.23 Appraisal Summary ................................................................................................... 242 7.24 Option Categorising and Prioritisation ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finalised Structure Plan Background Paper
    ABERDEEN Strategic Development CITY AND Planning Authority SHIRE Finalised Structure Plan Background Paper February 2009 Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire (excluding the Cairngorms National Park) Structure Plan Area covered by the Aberdeen City and Shire Structure Plan The Finalised Structure Plan was submitted to Scottish Ministers on 27 February 2009. The following documents were published in support of the Finalised Plan and are available from the Strategic Development Planning Authority or can be downloaded from its website: Appropriate Assessment Publicity and Consultation Statement Equalities and Human Rights Impact Assessment Addendum to the Report of Survey Addendum to the Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report Background Paper Aberdeen City and Shire Structure Plan Background Paper Background Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils formally started the preparation of a new structure plan for the area in February 2007. At the same time a ‘Report of Survey’ was published containing up-to-date information on the area in terms of its population and households, environment, economy, transport and housing. Purpose A draft structure plan was published for consultation in June 2008 and the finalised structure plan was submitted to Scottish Minister on 27 February 2009. However, the period February 2007 – February 2009 (the period between the publication of the Report of Survey and the finalised structure plan, a number of pieces of more up-to- date information have become available. It is necessary to provide an update on issues by way of background to the finalised structure plan. These relate to: 1. Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR); 2. Population and Household Forecasts & Projections; 3. Brownfield Urban Capacity (Aberdeen); 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Transport Assessment (May 2021)
    www.bexley.gov.uk Local Plan Transport Assessment May 2021 Local Plan Transport Assessment Contents Local Plan Transport Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Contents .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Local Plan Transport Assessments .................................................................................................................................... 6 This LPTA for Bexley .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Preface: Covid-19 and the Local Plan Transport Assessment ................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2 – Partnering with Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Highways England ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Distribution Strategy
    4ABZ3 Freight Distribution Strategy Deliverable No.: 4ABZ3 WD2 Project Acronym: CIVITAS PORTIS Full Title: Port Cities-Innovation for Sustainability Grant Agreement No.: 690713 Workpackage/Measure No.: 4ABZ3 Workpackage/ Measure Title: Freight Distribution Centre Responsible Author(s): Rab Dickson & Nicola Laird Responsible Co-Author(s): Date: 23 November 2018 Status: Final Dissemination level: Public Cleaner and better transport in cities Abstract Not Applicable Project Partners Organisation Country Abbreviation Nestrans Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level 01/08 Nicola Laird First Draft Draft Internal 16/10 Nicola Laird Second Draft Draft Internal 23/11 Nicola Laird Final Draft Final Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted (to European Commission). Dissemination Level: PC = Project Coordinator, SC=Site Coordinator, TC=Technical Coordinator, EM=Evaluation Manager. Nestrans • November 2018 2 / 32 Cleaner and better transport in cities Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Background ..................................................................................... 4 1.1 Aberdeen in 2018 & the Future ............................................................................ 4 1.2 Previous Freight Work .......................................................................................... 9 2. Vision .......................................................................................................................... 12 3. Work To-Date ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nestrans Active Travel Action Plan (Actrap) 2014-2035 DRAFT
    Nestrans Active Travel Action Plan (AcTrAP) 2014-2035 DRAFT 1. Introduction 1.1. The Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy (published in 2008 and refreshed in 2013) states that ‘increasing the proportion of journeys undertaken on foot and by bicycle will make a significant contribution to achieving the strategy’s accessibility, health and environmental objectives’. 1.2. A commitment to develop an Active Travel Action Plan was included in the 2013 refresh of the RTS with the aim of encouraging increased levels of active travel across the region. This action plan contains a long term vision for active travel in the north east and covers the period to 2035 with a review to be carried out every five years in line with the RTS. 2. Policy Context 1.3. The need to develop an Active Travel Action Plan was identified in the 2013 refresh of the Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy (RTS). This action Case study – Copenhagen plan will sit alongside and complement action plans already developed for bus; rail; freight; 40 years ago Copenhagen health and transport; and the Nestrans travel was just as congested as planning strategy. many other major cities, but now 36% of the population arriving at work or education 1.4. As well as contributing to achieving the objectives do so on bicycles, travelling of the RTS, the Active Travel Action Plan also from all over the Metro area needs to take account of, and work alongside, a on over 1,000km of cycle number of other partners and policies in the lanes. north east of Scotland and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland/Northern Ireland
    Please send your reports, observations, and comments by Mail to: The PSV Circle, Unit 1R, Leroy House, 9 436 Essex Road, LONDON, N1 3QP by FAX to: 0870 051 9442 by email to: [email protected] SCOTLAND & NORTHERN IRELAND NEWS SHEET 850-9-333 NOVEMBER 2010 SCOTLAND MAJOR OPERATORS ARRIVA SCOTLAND WEST Limited (SW) (Arriva) Liveries c9/10: 2003 Arriva - 1417 (P807 DBS), 1441 (P831 KES). Subsequent histories 329 (R129 GNW), 330 (R130 GNW), 342 (R112 GNW), 350 (S350 PGA), 352 (S352 PGA), 353 (S353 PGA): Stafford Bus Centre, Cotes Heath (Q) 7/10 ex Arriva Northumbria (ND) 2661/57/60/2/9/3. 899 (C449 BKM, later LUI 5603): Beaverbus, Wigston (LE) 8/10 ex McDonald, Wigston (LE). BLUEBIRD BUSES Limited (SN) (Stagecoach) Vehicles in from Highland Country (SN) 52238 9/10 52238 M538 RSO Vo B10M-62 YV31M2F16SA042188 Pn 9412VUM2800 C51F 12/94 from Orkney Coaches (SN) 52429 9/10 52429 YSU 882 Vo B10M-62 YV31MA61XVC060874 Pn 9?12VUP8654 C50FT 5/98 (ex NFL 881, R872 RST) from Highland Country (SN) 53113 10/10 53113 SV 09 EGK Vo B12B YV3R8M92X9A134325 Pn 0912.3TMR8374 C49FLT 7/09 Vehicles re-registered 52137 K567 GSA Vo B10M-60 YV31MGC1XPA030781 Pn 9212VCM0824 to FSU 331 10/10 (ex 127 ASV, K567 GSA) 52141 K571 DFS Vo B10M-60 YV31MGC10PA030739 Pn 9212VCM0809 to FSU 797 10/10 54046 SV 08 GXL Vo B12BT YV3R8M9218A128248 Pn 0815TAR7877 to 448 GWL 10/10 Vehicle modifications 9/10: fitted LED destination displays - 22254 (GSU 950, ex V254 ESX), 22272 (X272 MTS) 10/10: fitted LED destination displays - 22802 (V802 DFV).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Urban Transit Technologies Market Testing Final Report
    Advanced Urban Transit Technologies – Worldwide Market Testing Report summarising the feedback received through the Market Testing March 2020 £69.6 Billion GVA A region packed with ambition and untapped potential In partnership with: Institute for Transport Studies Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................................................. 4 Who is undertaking the Market Testing? .................................................................................................................. 5 What Happens Next? ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................... 6 This report ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3. SUMMARY OF KEY MESSAGES ........................................................................................................................... 8 4. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 1A ................................................................................................................12 Illustrative Quotes from Respondents ..................................................................................................................... 12 Points raised
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen International Airport Consultative Committee Annual Report 2017
    ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 1 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ABERDEEN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Chairman’s Introduction This is the fourth formal annual report of the Aberdeen International Airport Consultative Committee (AIACC). Every UK airport of any size is required under civil aviation legislation to provide an appropriate mechanism for consultation on its activities with representatives of the communities most affected by its activities. In practice, this requirement is universally discharged by setting up an airport consultative committee (ACC) that meets local needs. The Aberdeen Committee has a history spanning more than 60 years, from when it was first established in 1953 at the request of the government of the day. The airport’s operations have grown exponentially since then and the airport continues to make an invaluable contribution to the economy of the north east of Scotland. We believe it is vitally important that we publish a summary of our work over the previous year. We pride ourselves on being one of the more proactive airport consultative committees in the UK. On the one hand, we seek to influence the operation of the airport for the wider benefit of all our stakeholders, including the local communities affected by the business. On the other, we have gained a reputation at UK and Scottish government level for making time to submit considered responses to a whole range of consultation documents affecting aviation strategy and practice. We are never more pleased than when we can see our views taken into account in government decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • PE1236/LL 11 October 2012 Our Ref: N1/10 & N13/2 Your Ref: Alison
    PE1236/LL 11 October 2012 Our Ref: N1/10 & N13/2 Your Ref: Alison Wilson Assistant Clerk to the Public Petitions Committee T3.40 The Scottish Parliament EDINBURGH EH99 1SP Dear Ms Wilson Consideration of Petition PE1236 I refer to your letter dated 3 October 2012 to Nestrans requesting a timetable for the completion of our final report on the grade separated junction as was referred to in our earlier letter to the Committee dated 10 August 2012. This work was completed by the end of September and the Nestrans Board considered the draft report at their meeting on 9 October 2012. The Board approved the report for publication on the Nestrans website and it can be viewed at: http://www.nestrans.org.uk/a90-t-laurencekirk-junctions.html I have also enclosed an electronic copy of the report should this be of assistance. The Nestrans Board also instructed that the report be commended to Transport Scotland to urge that further consideration be given to the construction of grade separated junctions on the A90 at Laurencekirk. I hope the information within the report and this response is of assistance to the Committee, but please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. Yours sincerely Derick Murray Director A90 (T) Laurencekirk Junctions October 2012 A90 (T) Laurencekirk Junctions 1. Introduction 1.1 Nigel Don MSP met with officers of Aberdeenshire and Angus Councils and Nestrans on 9 January 2012 to discuss safety concerns at the Laurencekirk junctions with the A90 Trunk Road and the possible requirement for grade separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Is Getting Ahead
    COMMENT northern ireland same time human interaction, in less theatrical form (unless you are fare dodging), is retained jonathan in the form of roving teams of jovial inspectors. The well thought through concept and bray the well thought through details mean the whole adds up to a lot more than the sum of the parts. It’s what FirstGroup’s FTR should have been and wasn’t - despite the hype and sycophancy from the trade press, Department for Transport and so on that greeted its launch at the time. This isn’t plonking fancy new bendy buses on the streets, and walking away Northern Ireland - it’s a whole new Belfast thing. People say they are getting the Glider rather than saying is getting ahead they are getting the bus. Suburban shopping centres are giving Glider the credit for higher You may not have yet noticed, but it’s become the place to watch, footfall. Before it was implemented the media with growing bus and rail demand and plans for unified ticketing said all that bus priority would lead to is the shuttering up of local traders. Yet now look at Ballyhackamore - on a Glider route and voted Of the four main constituent parts of the getting bus priority in was trickier - however, one of the best places to live in the UK. And UK, only one of them saw bus use grow last rather than attempt to barrel bus lanes through it’s also doing its bit for bringing communities year. It is the same one on track to having a for the benefit of suburbanites, the opportunity together as some people from nationalist smart and fully unified ticketing system across was taken to renew local streetscapes, giving communities have been travelling on it across all forms of public transport, and which has local high streets a boost in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Bdoy 2018 Score Sheet Final Version
    BDoY Blackpool 2018 Scoresheet Competitor Name Company Final Position Competitor Number Country Designation TfL Left Tail Swing Bay Bus Right Tail Swing Front Separation Test Lay-By Bus Test Bicycle Stop Line StopBus 1 StopBus 2 Right Turn Prom KnowledgeDriver Total 1 39 Ian FIELD Stagecoach East Scotland SCO STA N 100 150 100 130 220 90 120 190 190 110 128 1528 2 80 Anthony QUINN Stagecoach West ENG STA N 100 160 120 130 250 50 120 210 140 70 160 1510 3 75 Raj VISWANATHAN Go-Ahead London ENG GA Y 70 150 120 110 250 60 120 160 190 110 160 1500 4 27 Nicholas GRAHAM First Hampshire, Dorset & Berkshire ENG FIR N 80 170 70 130 220 50 120 190 190 110 136 1466 5 7 Graham HALL Stagecoach South East ENG STA N 50 170 80 130 230 50 120 190 190 110 144 1464 6 21 Delfino GOUVEIA DE FREITAS RATP Dev London ENG RATP Y 60 150 50 130 220 90 120 170 210 110 152 1462 7 88 David WHITEHEAD Stagecoach East Midlands ENG STA N 80 160 80 130 220 90 120 180 170 110 120 1460 8 83 Stephen APPIAH Go-Ahead London ENG GA Y 80 210 50 130 220 90 120 160 190 110 96 1456 9 20 Steven MCLEOD Lothian Buses SCO ALB N 60 130 100 80 250 90 120 180 210 110 120 1450 10 64 Daniel BAINES Stagecoach Yorkshire ENG STA N 80 150 60 130 230 90 120 190 210 70 120 1450 11 60 Toni BRADLEY First Glasgow SCO FIR N 100 150 100 100 220 50 120 160 190 110 144 1444 12 5 Terence MILES RATP Dev London ENG RATP Y 100 130 80 130 220 50 120 180 190 110 128 1438 13 29 Glenn FOSTER First Cymru WAL FIR N 40 190 90 110 220 90 120 170 210 70 128 1438 14 10 Adam KSIAZEK First Aberdeen SCO FIR N 30 170
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTE of TRANSPORT and LOGISTICS STUDIES WORKING
    WORKING PAPER ITLS-WP-19-05 Collaboration as a service (CaaS) to fully integrate public transportation – lessons from long distance travel to reimagine Mobility as a Service By Rico Merkert, James Bushell and Matthew Beck Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), The University of Sydney Business School, Australia March 2019 ISSN 1832-570X INSTITUTE of TRANSPORT and LOGISTICS STUDIES The Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics Management The University of Sydney Established under the Australian Research Council’s Key Centre Program. NUMBER: Working Paper ITLS-WP-19-05 TITLE: Collaboration as a service (CaaS) to fully integrate public transportation – lessons from long distance travel to reimagine Mobility as a Service Integrated mobility aims to improve multimodal integration to ABSTRACT: make public transport an attractive alternative to private transport. This paper critically reviews extant literature and current public transport governance frameworks of both macro and micro transport operators. Our aim is to extent the concept of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), a proposed coordination mechanism for public transport that in our view is yet to prove its commercial viability and general acceptance. Drawing from the airline experience, we propose that smart ticketing systems, providing Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) can be extended with governance and operational processes that enhance their ability to facilitate Collaboration-as-a-Service (CaaS) to offer a reimagined MaaS 2.0 = CaaS + SaaS. Rather than using the traditional MaaS broker, CaaS incorporates operators more fully and utilises their commercial self-interest to deliver commercially viable and attractive integrated public transport solutions to consumers. This would also facilitate more collaboration of private sector operators into public transport with potentially new opportunities for taxi/rideshare/bikeshare operators and cross geographical transport providers (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland
    Research and Information Service Research Paper 7 October 2020 Des McKibbin Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland NIAR 289-20 This paper provides an overview of potential policies for decarbonising road and rail transport in Northern Ireland in support of UK wide commitments to reach net zero Green House Gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. It has been prepared for the NI Assembly Infrastructure Committee to inform their discussion on potential areas of inquiry. Paper 57/20 7 October 2020 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relate to our papers and these should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 289-20 Research Paper Executive Summary Policy Framework Tackling climate change requires an international effort and as such both the UK and the EU are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Both the UK and EU have signed up to international climate change obligations, such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The 2015 Paris Agreement, a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, has been signed by 194 states and the European Union The UK has ratified the Paris Agreement separately from the EU and has committed to upholding its Paris Agreement obligations post Brexit. The Climate Change Act 2008 (2008 Act) originally established long term statutory targets for the UK to achieve an 80% reduction in GHG by 2050 against a 1990 baseline.
    [Show full text]