DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced Urban Transit Technologies Market Testing Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced Urban Transit Technologies Market Testing Final Report Advanced Urban Transit Technologies – Worldwide Market Testing Report summarising the feedback received through the Market Testing March 2020 £69.6 Billion GVA A region packed with ambition and untapped potential In partnership with: Institute for Transport Studies Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................................................. 4 Who is undertaking the Market Testing? .................................................................................................................. 5 What Happens Next? ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................... 6 This report ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3. SUMMARY OF KEY MESSAGES ........................................................................................................................... 8 4. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 1A ................................................................................................................12 Illustrative Quotes from Respondents ..................................................................................................................... 12 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 12 5. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 1B ................................................................................................................16 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 16 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 16 6. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 1C ................................................................................................................19 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 19 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 20 7. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 2 ..................................................................................................................26 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 26 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 27 8. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 3 ..................................................................................................................32 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 32 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 32 9. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 4 ..................................................................................................................35 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 35 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 36 10. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 5 ..................................................................................................................39 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 39 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 41 11. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 6 ..................................................................................................................45 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 45 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 46 12. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 7 ..................................................................................................................48 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 48 Points raised by respondents................................................................................................................................... 50 13. FEEDBACK ON DISCUSSION AREA 8 ..................................................................................................................54 Illustrative Quotes from respondents ...................................................................................................................... 54 Key Feedback Received from Respondents ............................................................................................................. 56 Page 2 of 112 Appendices • Appendix 1: Market Testing Prospectus issued in August 2019 • Appendix 2: Copy of Prior Invitation Notice issued in August 2019 • Appendix 3: List of participants • Appendix 4: Summary of images provided by respondents Page 3 of 112 1. Purpose of this report 1.1. This report summarises the messages and opinions which the West Yorkshire Combined Authority has heard from Industry regarding the “Advanced Urban Transit Technologies: Market Testing”. 1.2. The market testing has been targeted towards all promoters, manufacturers, suppliers, constructors, engineers, system developers and operators of urban transit systems from across the world. There was strong industry interest with around 120 organisations taking part in the market testing. Organisations from sectors including monorail, pod, bus, tram, train, metro manufacturers and operators and consultancies as well as interested stakeholder groups took part, with bases from across the UK, Europe, North America, Asia and Japan. 1.3. Based on the feedback received, this report highlights the areas where the mass transit sector is undertaking research and development to enable cities to come forward with innovative and advanced mass transit systems. It highlights the views from industry around how mass transit can contribute to addressing the climate emergency and how mass transit can help to stimulate inward investment. 1.4. The feedback received through this market testing will form an important part of the evidence base for the development of the business case for mass transit in West Yorkshire. It should be noted that: 1.4.1. As the report focuses on the key messages received, it does not specifically identify which organisations provided which feedback, or reflect all feedback provided. All the organisations which have participated in the market testing are listed in Appendix 3. 1.4.2. Whilst the report reflects the common messages, opinions and views of industry, it should not be taken as a West Yorkshire Combined Authority policy position. 1.4.3. The report solely focuses on the evidence submitted from respondents and whilst the market testing received a strong level of response from industry, it is not an exhaustive review of all mass transit technologies which could exist. 1.4.4. As can be expected with any engagement, there have been a wide range of views received with several conflicting opinions expressed for certain questions. 1.4.5. Finally, choices on future mass transit technologies for West Yorkshire will be informed by the conclusions of this report but will not be constrained by it. 1.5. The West Yorkshire Combined Authority project team are grateful to the time, effort and resource provided by all the respondents to this important market testing. Page 4 of 112 Who is undertaking the Market Testing? 1.6. This market testing was undertaken in partnership between the following organisations: 1.6.1. The West Yorkshire Combined Authority 1.6.2. The University of Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies 1.6.3. The University of Huddersfield, Institute for Railway Research What Happens Next? 1.7. The Combined Authority are keen to continue to develop the conversations with respondents, as the work continues around mass transit. 1.8. The Combined Authority, in partnership with partner councils are currently progressing development of a Transit Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) which is expected to report during 2020. This business case will be informed by a range of sources including the evidence provided in this report. 1.9. Engagement would be anticipated to take place on the conclusions of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Plan Transport Assessment (May 2021)
    www.bexley.gov.uk Local Plan Transport Assessment May 2021 Local Plan Transport Assessment Contents Local Plan Transport Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Contents .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1 – Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Local Plan Transport Assessments .................................................................................................................................... 6 This LPTA for Bexley .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Preface: Covid-19 and the Local Plan Transport Assessment ................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2 – Partnering with Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Highways England ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Element
    Town of Cary Comprehensive Transportation Pllan Chapter 6 – Introduction At the time of the 2001 Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the Town of Cary had no bus service other than Route 301 operated by the Triangle Transit Authority (TTA). Since then, Cary has expanded its transit Transit services considerably, with a new local fixed-route service for the public and demand-responsive paratransit for seniors and persons with disabilities. TTA has added routes as well. As the Town’s Element population continues rising and travel demand increases, the Town plans to expand its local service, capturing riders coming from and going to planned residential and commercial developments. Situated amidst the Research Triangle of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, Cary is served today by multiple transit providers. Fixed route bus services within Cary are provided by C-Tran and TTA. C-Tran, Wake Coordinated Transportation Services (WCTS), and the Center for Volunteer Caregiving provide demand-responsive paratransit services. WCTS also provides rural general public transit via its TRACS service program; however, services are not provided for urban trips within Cary. Amtrak operates daily train service. This chapter describes current fixed-route transit and paratransit conditions, projected growth in the Town, and proposed future service changes. C-Tran Overview C-Tran is the Town of Cary’s sponsored transit service which originated as a door-to-door service for seniors and disabled residents in 2001. In July 2002, door-to-door services were expanded
    [Show full text]
  • BUS SERVICES (WALES) BILL Explanatory Memorandum
    BUS SERVICES (WALES) BILL Explanatory Memorandum incorporating the Regulatory Impact Assessment and Explanatory Notes March 2020 Bus Services (Wales) Bill Explanatory Memorandum to Bus Services (Wales) Bill This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by Department of Economy, Skills and Natural Resources of the Welsh Government and is laid before the National Assembly for Wales. Member’s Declaration In my view the provisions of the Bus Services (Wales) Bill, introduced by me on the 16 March 2020, would be within the legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales. Ken Skates AM Minister for Economy and Transport Assembly Member in charge of the Bill 16 March 2020 1 Contents page Part 1 – EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. Description 2. Legislative Competence 3. Purpose and intended effect of the legislation 4. Consultation 5. Power to make subordinate legislation PART 2 – REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6. Regulatory Impact Assessment summary 7. Options 8. Costs and benefits 9. Impact Assessments 10. Post implementation review ANNEX 1 – Explanatory Notes ANNEX 2 – Index of Standing Orders ANNEX 3 – Schedule of Amendments 2 PART 1 – EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. Chapter 1 – Description 1.1 The Bus Service (Wales) Bill will make changes to the legislative framework relating to the planning and delivery of local bus services in Wales. It will amend the existing legislative provision and provide local authorities with an improved range of tools to consider using when planning and delivering local bus services. The Bill will put in place new information sharing arrangements. 3 2. Chapter 2 – Legislative Competence 2.1 The National Assembly for Wales (‘the Assembly") has the legislative competence to make the provisions in the Bus Services (Wales) Bill (“the Bill”) pursuant to Part 4 of the Government of Wales Act 2006 ("GoWA 2006") as amended by the Wales Act 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Zero Next Steps Towards Cleaner Road Transport and Delivering Our Industrial Strategy
    The Road to Zero Next steps towards cleaner road transport and delivering our Industrial Strategy July 2018 The Road to Zero Next steps towards cleaner road transport and delivering our Industrial Strategy The Government has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Government’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk Website www.gov.uk/dft © Crown copyright, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Printed in July 2018. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v2.0. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Contents Foreword 1 Policies at a glance 2 Executive Summary 7 Part 1: Drivers of change 21 Part 2: Vehicle Supply and Demand 33 Part 2a: Reducing emissions from vehicles already on our roads 34 Part 2b: Driving uptake of the cleanest new cars and vans 42 Part 2c:
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Is Getting Ahead
    COMMENT northern ireland same time human interaction, in less theatrical form (unless you are fare dodging), is retained jonathan in the form of roving teams of jovial inspectors. The well thought through concept and bray the well thought through details mean the whole adds up to a lot more than the sum of the parts. It’s what FirstGroup’s FTR should have been and wasn’t - despite the hype and sycophancy from the trade press, Department for Transport and so on that greeted its launch at the time. This isn’t plonking fancy new bendy buses on the streets, and walking away Northern Ireland - it’s a whole new Belfast thing. People say they are getting the Glider rather than saying is getting ahead they are getting the bus. Suburban shopping centres are giving Glider the credit for higher You may not have yet noticed, but it’s become the place to watch, footfall. Before it was implemented the media with growing bus and rail demand and plans for unified ticketing said all that bus priority would lead to is the shuttering up of local traders. Yet now look at Ballyhackamore - on a Glider route and voted Of the four main constituent parts of the getting bus priority in was trickier - however, one of the best places to live in the UK. And UK, only one of them saw bus use grow last rather than attempt to barrel bus lanes through it’s also doing its bit for bringing communities year. It is the same one on track to having a for the benefit of suburbanites, the opportunity together as some people from nationalist smart and fully unified ticketing system across was taken to renew local streetscapes, giving communities have been travelling on it across all forms of public transport, and which has local high streets a boost in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Light Rail Transit with Bus Semirapid Transit
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ESE) Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering 10-2000 Comparison of Light Rail Transit With Bus Semirapid Transit Vukan R. Vuchic University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/ese_papers Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Systems Engineering Commons, and the Transportation Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Vukan R. Vuchic, "Comparison of Light Rail Transit With Bus Semirapid Transit", 5th UITP Light Rail Conference . October 2000. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/ese_papers/741 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comparison of Light Rail Transit With Bus Semirapid Transit Abstract Selection of transit modes is one of the most important decisions in the transit planning process. A particularly important decision is the selection between bus and rail modes, because it influences the type of service that will be offered and, more importantly, the role transit will play in the city. Ultimately, such a decision has an impact on the quality of life in the city. It is therefore necessary to include in the selection process the physical and economic characteristics of modes, as well as the quality of service, attraction of passengers and the impacts of the transit system on its served area and the entire city or suburb. Disciplines Civil Engineering | Engineering | Systems Engineering | Transportation Engineering This conference paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/ese_papers/741 Vukan R. Vuchic 5th UITP Light Rail Conference University of Pennsylvania Melbourne, Australia 9 October 2000 COMPARISON OF LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT WITH BUS SEMIRAPID TRANSIT Selection of transit modes is one of the most important decisions in the transit planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demand Performance of Bus Rapid Transit
    Demand Performance of BRT The Demand Performance of Bus Rapid Transit Graham Currie, Monash University Abstract This article uses a trip attribute approach to examine the relative passenger attrac- tiveness of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems compared to other transit modes. It examines how passengers value trip attributes for on-street bus, BRT, and light rail and heavy rail systems in passenger behavior research. Empirical data is presented which suggests that passengers value trip attributes for BRT and rail modes in a broadly similar manner. All of these transit modes are favored relative to on-street bus. These findings suggest that BRT systems should be as effective as rail in generat- ing patronage when developed to replace on-street bus services. This conclusion, in association with research demonstrating lower costs for BRT systems compared to rail, may be used to claim cost effectiveness advantages for BRT. However, a number of limitations in the evidence are identified and additional research suggested. Con- clusions of the research are also used to suggest ways to improve BRT system design to enhance demand performance. Introduction Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is now a major trend in the development of public trans- port systems worldwide. While BRT has been shown to have lower implementa- tion costs compared to other transit modes (General Accounting Office 2001), its cost effectiveness can only be assessed by examining its relative performance in generating demand compared to other transit modes. 41 Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005 This article explores the relative passenger attractiveness of BRT systems compared to other transit modes by studying trip attribute research evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Service Vehicles (Open Data) (England) Regulations 2020 No
    Draft Legislation: This is a draft item of legislation. This draft has since been made as a UK Statutory Instrument: The Public Service Vehicles (Open Data) (England) Regulations 2020 No. 749 Draft Regulations laid before Parliament under section 160(2A) of the Transport Act 2000, for approval by resolution of each House of Parliament. DRAFT STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No.0000 PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT, ENGLAND The Public Service Vehicles (Open Data) (England) Regulations 2020 Made - - - - 2020 Coming into force in accordance with regulation 1 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 141A of the Transport Act 2000(1), makes the following Regulations. The Secretary of State has, in accordance with section 141A(10) of the Transport Act 2000, consulted such persons and organisations appearing to him to represent the interests of operators and users of relevant local services, such persons and organisations appearing to him to represent the interests of local transport authorities whose areas are in England, and such other persons and organisations as he considered appropriate. A draft of this instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament pursuant to section 160(2A) of the Transport Act 2000(2). Citation and commencement 1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Public Service Vehicles (Open Data) (England) Regulations 2020. (2) These Regulations come into force twenty-one days after the day on which they are made. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Regulations— “the 1986 Regulations” means the Public Service Vehicles (Registration of Local Services) Regulations 1986(3); (1) 2000 c.38.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Change Improving Urban Bus Services
    Delivering change Improving urban bus services Simon Jeffrey November 2019 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about Partnerships Centre for Cities is always keen to work in partnership with like-minded organisations who share our commitment to helping cities to thrive, and supporting policy makers to achieve that aim. As a registered charity (no. 1119841) we rely on external support to deliver our programme of quality research and events. To find out more please visit: www.centreforcities.org/about/partnerships About the author Simon Jeffrey is a policy officer at Centre for Cities: [email protected] | 020 7803 4321 About the sponsor This report was supported by Abellio, Metroline and Tower Transit. Delivering change • Improving urban bus services • November 2019 00 Executive summary Buses are critical urban infrastructure. They not only provide access to jobs for workers without a car, but they offer the mass-transit capacity that make jobs-dense, high-wage city centre economies possible. In so doing they take cars off of the road, and reduce greenhouse gases, nitrogen dioxides and fine particulate matter from tyres and brakes. Bus services link people to friends and family, young people to education, shoppers to high streets and communities to the public services — from GPs’ surgeries to libraries — that they need.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland
    Research and Information Service Research Paper 7 October 2020 Des McKibbin Decarbonising Transport in Northern Ireland NIAR 289-20 This paper provides an overview of potential policies for decarbonising road and rail transport in Northern Ireland in support of UK wide commitments to reach net zero Green House Gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. It has been prepared for the NI Assembly Infrastructure Committee to inform their discussion on potential areas of inquiry. Paper 57/20 7 October 2020 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relate to our papers and these should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 289-20 Research Paper Executive Summary Policy Framework Tackling climate change requires an international effort and as such both the UK and the EU are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Both the UK and EU have signed up to international climate change obligations, such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The 2015 Paris Agreement, a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, has been signed by 194 states and the European Union The UK has ratified the Paris Agreement separately from the EU and has committed to upholding its Paris Agreement obligations post Brexit. The Climate Change Act 2008 (2008 Act) originally established long term statutory targets for the UK to achieve an 80% reduction in GHG by 2050 against a 1990 baseline.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transport: a New Generation of Interchanges
    Integrated transport A new generation of interchanges www.bettertransport.org.uk Contents Executive summary Executive summary 3 Transport networks should be efficient, affordable, Funding and support accessible and comprehensive. Good modal Introduction 4 A Bus and Coach Investment Strategy is long overdue. interchanges are central to creating such networks. The Government should develop a multi-year bus Planning and interchanges 6 and coach investment strategy to sit alongside other That much of the country lacks such systems is the Case study - Thurrock 12 transport investment, such as the Road Investment result of disjointed and reductive transport planning Strategy and rail’s High Level Output Specification. Case study - Catthorpe Interchange 16 and investment. Despite in-principle support and a number of small national initiatives, there has been Case study - Luton North 19 A joint Department for Transport (DfT), Department a widespread and ongoing failure to link transport for Housing, Communities and Local Government Other opportunities for improved connectivity 23 networks and modes. The resulting over-reliance on fund should be established to support the delivery cars is engendering negative social, economic and Conclusions and recommendations 26 of national priority interchanges and to fund regional environmental ramifications. These consequences assessment of interchange opportunities. Cross- References and image credits 30 unfairly disadvantage those who do not have a car government working should also examine how better and lead to perverse spending decisions to address interchanges can contribute to policies such as the the resulting congestion. Industrial Strategy. We need a better way forward. This report makes the Infrastructure schemes funded via the Road Investment case for a new generation of transport interchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Tram, Trolley Or Guided Bus: What Are the Best Choices for London? Proceedings of a Seminar Held by the Transport Committee April 2004 Transport Committee
    Transport Committee Tram, trolley or guided bus: what are the best choices for London? Proceedings of a seminar held by the Transport Committee April 2004 Transport Committee Tram, trolley or guided bus: what are the best choices for London? Proceedings of a seminar held by the Transport Committee April 2004 copyright Greater London Authority April 2004 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 585 0 Cover photographs Tram and guided bus ©Robert Bain Trolley bus ©Lars Freund This publication is printed on recycled paper Chair’s foreword One of the most useful and positive parts of the London Assembly’s work is to host seminars where leading experts in particular fields can inform and debate with stakeholders, politicians and local government officers. The publication of these contributions will help Londoners and their representatives to develop opinions based on well-researched information instead of speculation and prejudice. It was in this spirit that the Transport Committee of the Assembly hosted a seminar into trams, trolley buses and guided busways, with a view to informing ourselves and London about the proposals for tram and bus schemes that the Mayor is promoting through Transport for London. Peter Hendy provided a rapid but thorough overview of Transport for London’s policies, plans and programme in this area. Carmen Hass-Klau contrasted this with what is going on in continental Europe, looking at what London has to learn. She gave us a glimpse of tram projects in Nantes, Paris and Orleans, the Translohr rubber-tyred tram, and bus trains in Utrecht and Hamburg.
    [Show full text]