DOCSLIB.ORG

South Philadelphia Transportation Center 0IV Figure 50 | Route 29 to IKEA Transit Facility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Philadelphia Transportation Center 0IV Figure 50 | Route 29 to IKEA Transit Facility I I I I I I I I South Philadelphia I I I I I I Transportation I I I I I I Center I I I I I I Washington Avenue I I 64 I ' Columbus Boulevard Columbus I ' I I 25 I 7 I I 47 64 Pier 70 Transit Facility Tasker Street G 29 64 79 Morris Street 29 29 \ \ \ \ 57 \ \ 23rd Street 22nd Street 8th Street 7th Street Snyder Avenue 79 79 Weccacoe Avenue 4th Street 2nd Street BSL 47 57 Oregon Avenue G 7 3rd Street Transit Facility 25 47 57 April 2019 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for a diverse nine-county region in two states: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and MD Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. • Baltimore DE dDELAWARE VALLEY DVRPC's vision for the Greater Philadelphia Region is a prosperous, innovative, equitable, "'.,J!rpc resilient, and sustainable region that increases PLANNING COMMISSION mobility choices by investing in a safe and modern transportation system; that protects and preserves our natural resources while creating healthy communities; and that fosters greater opportunities for all. DVRPC's mission is to achieve this vision by convening the widest array of partners to inform and facilitate data-driven decision-making. We are engaged across the region, and strive to be leaders and innovators, exploring new ideas and creating best practices. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE I DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 7987, Executive Order 72898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC's website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and in transit-accessible locations when possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting. Requests will be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by DVRPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint. Any such complaint may be in writing and filed with DVRPC's Title VI Compliance Manager and/or the appropriate state or federal agency within 780 days of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. For more information on DVRPC's Title VI program or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, please visit: www.dvrpc.org/GetlnvolvedlTitleVI, call (275) 592-7800, or email [email protected]. DVRPC is funded through a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC's state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Introduction......................................................................................................................................3 Related Plans.............................................................................................................................................................5 Existing Conditions..................................................................................................................................................8 Accessing Major Destinations of Activity...........................................................................................................10 SEPTA Passenger Survey.......................................................................................................................................12 Chapter 2: Finding the Best Location..........................................................................................................17 Transit Facilities......................................................................................................................................................17 Examples of Bus Facilities in the SEPTA Network............................................................................................18 Finding a Site for the Facility: Parcel Analysis...................................................................................................22 Conclusion...............................................................................................................................................................22 Chapter 3: Understanding Operations........................................................................................................25 Candidate Locations..............................................................................................................................................26 Enhanced Stops or Plazas......................................................................................................................................31 Operations Principles.............................................................................................................................................32 Operations Analysis...............................................................................................................................................34 Route G Overview..................................................................................................................................................36 Route G Modifications...........................................................................................................................................38 Route 7 Overview...................................................................................................................................................40 Route 7 Modification..............................................................................................................................................42 Route 25 Overview.................................................................................................................................................44 Route 25 Modification ...........................................................................................................................................46 Route 29 Overview.................................................................................................................................................48 Route 29 Modifications .........................................................................................................................................50 Route 47 Overview.................................................................................................................................................52 Route 47 Modification ...........................................................................................................................................54 Route 47M Overview.............................................................................................................................................56 Route 57 Overview.................................................................................................................................................58 Route 57 Modification............................................................................................................................................60 Route 64 Overview.................................................................................................................................................62 Route 64 Modifications..........................................................................................................................................64 Route 79 Overview.................................................................................................................................................66 Route 79 Modifications..........................................................................................................................................68 Chapter 4: Recommendations.......................................................................................................................71 Composite Operations Scenario 1: Pier 70 and 3rd Street Transit Facilities..................................................72 Composite Operations Scenario 2: IKEA and 3rd Street Transit Facilities.....................................................74 Pier 70 Proposed Transit Facility..........................................................................................................................76 3rd Street Proposed Transit Facility.....................................................................................................................82 Chapter 5: Next Steps.......................................................................................................................................89 0III Figures: Figure 1 | Stakeholder Committee Meeting Participants........................................................................3 Figure 2 | Project Study Area .....................................................................................................................4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation
    visionHagerstown 2035 5 | Transportation Transportation Introduction An adequate vehicular circulation system is vital for Hagerstown to remain a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Road projects that add highway capacity and new road links will be necessary to meet the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for growth management, economic development, and the downtown. This chapter addresses the City of Hagerstown’s existing transportation system and establishes priorities for improvements to roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities over the next 20 years. Goals 1. The city’s transportation network, including roads, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, will meet the mobility needs of its residents, businesses, and visitors of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. 2. Transportation projects will support the City’s growth management goals. 3. Long-distance traffic will use major highways to travel around Hagerstown rather than through the city. Issues Addressed by this Element 1. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs to be enhanced to maintain safe and efficient flow of people and goods in and around the city. 2. Hagerstown’s network of major roads is generally complete, with many missing or partially complete segments in the Medium-Range Growth Area. 3. Without upgrades, the existing road network will not be sufficient to accommodate future traffic in and around Hagerstown. 4. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs more alternatives to the automobile, including transit and bicycle facilities and pedestrian opportunities. Existing Transportation Network Known as “Hub City,” Hagerstown has long served as a transportation center, first as a waypoint on the National Road—America’s first Dual Highway (US Route 40) federally funded highway—and later as a railway node.
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • Baltlink Rider Guide-944004A2.Pdf
    WHAT IS BALTIMORELINK? BaltimoreLink is a complete overhaul and rebranding of the core transit system operating within Baltimore City and the surrounding region. Many of MTA’s current bus routes are outdated, and BaltimoreLink will improve service through a more reliable and efficient network. BaltimoreLink also includes transfer facilities, dedicated bus lanes, signal priority, and improved bus stop signs, among many other improvements. To deliver an interconnected transit network, existing MTA bus and rail services will be restructured and renamed: • CityLink: Twelve new high-frequency, color-coded bus routes will connect with each other, as well as Metro SubwayLink, Light RailLink, MARC Train, Commuter Bus, Amtrak, and other services, into one integrated transit network. • LocalLink (currently Local Bus): LocalLink routes will provide comprehensive crosstown connections and improved connections to neighborhoods and communities throughout the system. • Express BusLink (currently Express Bus): Express BusLink will include several existing Express Bus services that provide suburb-to- city connections and recently launched routes providing suburb-to-suburb connections. Typically, Express Bus routes have fewer stops and use higher speed roads. • Light RailLink (currently Light Rail): Light Rail service will operate along the same line but with improved connections to buses. • Metro SubwayLink (currently Metro Subway): This service will not change but will have improved connections to buses. baltimorelink.com | 1 BETTER BUS STOPS BALTIMORELINK RESOURCE INFORMATION To create a better rider experience by providing information you can use, the MTA will be All MTA routes will change under installing new bus stop signs throughout the BaltimoreLink. Please look for Rider Alerts for entire MTA bus network.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Philadelphia Families During Coronavirus (Covid-19)
    RESOURCES FOR PHILADELPHIA FAMILIES DURING CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) Are you pregnant or a parent/caregiver of a young child? We know there is a lot of fear and change right now because of Coronavirus (COVID-19) so we want to share important information about supplies and resources to care for you and your child. Please visit phila.gov/(COVID-19) or call 1-800-722-7112 for more information. Note: Please call organizations first for updated services and hours. Breastfeeding Support Pacify: https://www.pacify.com/ • A FREE mobile app that provides on-demand access to lactation specialists right from your smartphone • Get the “Pacify” app in the Apple Store or Google Play • Enter the enrollment code PHILLY at signup for FREE 24/7 access Breast pumps: You can reach out to your insurance provider to request a breast pump delivered to your home Baby Supplies (Diapers, Formula, and Food) WIC: http://northwic.org/ • Resource: WIC EBT card • Note: Participants will now be seen outside of the office for safety reasons using a new card exchange system. Please call on arrival to the office. WIC has stopped the requirement of infants, children, and/or pregnant women having to come in for their WIC benefits – participants can send someone to come in for them if they tell WIC staff over the phone who will be coming to pick up their benefits and that person needs to bring photo identification. • Sites: − North Philadelphia WIC Office: 215-229-3786, 1300 W Lehigh Ave #104, Phila, PA 19132 − South Philadelphia WIC Office: 215-463-5571, 1165 S Broad St, Phila,
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Report
    1 Bethesda Transportation Management District Bethesda Transportation Solutions Montgomery County, Maryland BIENNIAL REPORT FY2008 – FY2009 Operating under a contract between Montgomery County, Maryland and the Bethesda Urban Partnership Executive Director Director David Dabney Danielle Milo Contributing Staff : Rachel Porter Anne Kaiser Allison Kemp Tom Robertson Jennifer Zucker Bethesda Transportation Solutions Biennial Report FY2008 - FY2009 MARCH 2010 2 Bethesda Transportation Management District Montgomery County, Maryland Biennial Report FY2008 – FY2009 Completed: March 2010 Prepared by: Bethesda Transportation Solutions Request additional copies from: Bethesda Transportation Solutions 7700 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, MD 20814 Telephone: (301) 656-0868 Fax: (243) 223-0200 Email: [email protected] www.bethesdatransit.org www.bethesda.org Bethesda Transportation Solutions Biennial Report FY2008 - FY2009 3 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 7 II. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 11 III. TMD Operations, Programs & Services....................................................................... 13 A. TMD Objectives ....................................................................................................13 B. TMD Operations ...................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Gail Farmer Director of Education
    Gail Farmer Director of Education Children spend 1% of their free time outdoors Hofferth, S. and Sandberg, J. ( 1999). Changes in American Children’s Time, 1981-1997, University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. Children spend 7.5 hours per day in front of screens. Rideout, VJ et al. Kaiser Family Foundation Report. 2010 Angora Park 57th St. & Baltimore Ave. Childhood has Retreated Indoors “...we will not fight to save what we do not love” -Stephen Jay Gould Angora Park 57th St. & Baltimore Ave. Childhood has Retreated Indoors Sitting is the New Smoking Diabetes Hypertension Asthma Obesity Depression Vitamin D deficiency Angora Park 57th St. & Baltimore Ave. Childhood has Retreated Indoors Nature Rx Big Goal and Potential Outcomes Nature Rx Big Goal and Potential Outcomes Value of urban Green space Get more Healthy Social Phila families Behaviors Capital active in green spaces Nature connection Nature Rx Systems Thinking Urban planning Environmental Municipalities Orgs Social workers Clinicians Municipalities Urban planning Public health agencies and Health orgs – Social workers social orgs determinants of health Environmental Orgs Nature Rx Strategic Planning & Implementation Stakeholder & Partner Organizations Non-Profit Organizations National Environmental Education Foundation Smith Memorial Playground The Circuit Coalition Philadelphia Play Works Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia The Workshop School Health Promotion Council Physicians for Social Responsibility Dela. Valley Assoc. for the Education of Young Children
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report
    Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report of the Advisory Committee August 2002 Advisory Committee Imagine the possibilities. In September 2001, Maryland Department of Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari appointed 23 a system of fast, convenient and elected, civic, business, transit and community leaders from throughout the Baltimore region to reliable rail lines running throughout serve on The Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Advisory Committee. He asked them to recommend the region, connecting all of life's a Regional Rail System long-term plan and to identify priority projects to begin the Plan's implemen- important activities. tation. This report summarizes the Advisory Committee's work. Imagine being able to go just about everywhere you really need to go…on the train. 21 colleges, 18 hospitals, Co-Chairs 16 museums, 13 malls, 8 theatres, 8 parks, 2 stadiums, and one fabulous Inner Harbor. You name it, you can get there. Fast. Just imagine the possibilities of Red, Mr. John A. Agro, Jr. Ms. Anne S. Perkins Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, and Orange – six lines, 109 Senior Vice President Former Member We can get there. Together. miles, 122 stations. One great transit system. EarthTech, Inc. Maryland House of Delegates Building a system of rail lines for the Baltimore region will be a challenge; no doubt about it. But look at Members Atlanta, Boston, and just down the parkway in Washington, D.C. They did it. So can we. Mr. Mark Behm The Honorable Mr. Joseph H. Necker, Jr., P.E. Vice President for Finance & Dean L. Johnson Vice President and Director of It won't happen overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Fqhcs in Philadelphia Federally Qualified Health Centers
    FQHCs in Philadelphia Federally Qualified Health Centers Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are “safety net” providers such as community health centers. The main purpose of the FQHC Program is to enhance the provision of primary care services in underserved communities. Any Philadelphia resident is eligible for free or low cost care at the City’s AHS Health Centers. North Philadelphia Facility Address Zip Code Phone AHS Health Center #5 1900 N. 20th St 19121 215-685-2933 AHS Health Center #6 301 W. Girard Ave 19123 215-685-3803 Strawberry Mansion Health Center 2840 Dauphin St 19132 215-685-2401 DVCH Fairmount Primary Care Center 1412 Fairmount Ave 19130 215-235-9600 QCHC Cooke Family Health Center 1300 W. Louden St 19141 215-457-6902 QCHC Family Health Center 2501 W. Lehigh Ave 19132 215-227-0300 QCHC Meade Family Health Center 1600 N. 18th St 19121 215-765-9501 GPHA Hunting Park Health Center 1999 W. Hunting Park Ave 19140 215-228-9300 GPHA Medical Suite At Temple 3223 North Broad St 19140 215-226-3789 DVCH Maria De Los Santos Health Center 401 W. Allegheny Ave 19133 215-291-2500 Esperanza Health Center – Kensington 3156 Kensington Ave 19134 215-831-1100 Esperanza Health Center – N. 5th St. 2940 N. 5th St 19133 215-221-6633 Esperanza Health Center – N. 6th St. 4417 N. 6th St 19134 215-302-3600 PHMC Health Connection 1900 N 9th St 19122 215-765-6690 PHMC Health Center at Temple 3401 North Broad St 19140 215-731-7144 PHMC Congreso 412 W. Lehigh Ave 19133 267-765-2272 Project Home-Stephen Klein Wellness Ctr 2144 Cecil B Moore Ave 19121 215-320-6187 Spectrum Broad St Health Center 1415 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement for Lower Northeast Planning District 2012
    ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH AND CULTURAL HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT 2012 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT EMILY T. COOPERMAN, PH.D. Geographical Summary The Lower Northeast Planning District (figure 1) lies inland (northwest) of the Delaware River waterfront at the point where the northeast and northwest sections of the city branch off from north Philadelphia. The Lower Northeast Planning District is characterized by relatively flat topography that rises gradually from the southeast to the northwest, moving away from the river. The Planning District is bounded on the southwest by the Frankford and Tacony creeks, and abuts Montgomery County on the northwest just south of the Tacony Creek as it turns to the northeast. The Tacony Creek becomes the Frankford Creek at the point where it historically met the Wingohocking Creek, which flowed east from Germantown and is now culverted, near the intersection of Tabor Road and Garland Street. Historically, the Little Tacony Creek flowed in several branches through the heart of the Planning District, meeting the Frankford Creek below where Erie Avenue is now located. Figure 1. Lower Northeast Planning District, outlined in black, with the area previously studied shown in gray LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT HISTORIC CONTEXT – PAGE 1 ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH AND CULTURAL HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LOWER NORTHEAST PLANNING DISTRICT 2012 Introduction The Lower Northeast Planning District can be divided into three general zones that developed at different rates. The settlement and industrial village of Frankford, which was studied in the Historic Context Statement for Neighborhood Cluster 1 (2008-2009), was the historic town center of the Planning District and was one of several such urban concentrations that developed in Philadelphia’s former county before the 1854 Consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Status of the Appalachian Development Highway System
    Status of the Appalachian Development Highway System as of September 30, 2020 December 2020 Status of the Appalachian Development Highway System as of September 30, 2020 APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM as of September 30, 2020 N EW Y ORK W ISCONSIN T M ICHIGAN T U-1 U P ENNSYLVANIA P O-1 P-1 O M M I LLINOIS I NDIANA O HIO M O EW N N ERSEY M J C E AR WARE C-1 YLAND A D D H EL C D B-1 WEST VIRGINIA D B L B G R I B ENTUCKY V IRGINIA K I HART Q B Q J F J F B S J-1 B T ENNESSEE N ORTH C AROLINA J K K A W V V V A-2 A A-1 S OUTH C AROLINA X X-1 MISSISSIPPI G EORGIA A LABAMA ADHS Miles Open to Traffic ADHS Miles Not Open to Traffic Interstate Highway System Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) FY 2020 Accomplishments & Future Outlook Status of Completion of the ADHS At the end of FY 2020, a total of 2,814.0 miles, or 91.1 percent of the 3,090.1 miles authorized for the ADHS, were either complete, currently meeting traffic needs, open to traffic or under construction; 44.7 miles were in the final design or right-of-way acquisition phase, and 231.4 miles were in the location studies phase (pre- environmental). See Table 1 for the latest mileage totals by status category and state. See Appendix A for the latest mileage totals by ADHS Corridor, status category and state.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area
    Prepared for: Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: with Crossroads Transportation Financial Assistance Provided By: February 26, 2016 MPO Adopted: March 24, 2016 Federal Concurrence: Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Process, Purpose, and the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.1 What is Transportation Planning? ....................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.2 What Is the Role of an MPO in Regional Transportation Planning? .................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Why are MPOs required? .................................................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 What is the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)? ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Where is the CAMPO Region? ............................................................................................................................................. 1‐4 1.6 What is CAMPO’s Organizational Structure? ...................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.7 What is Plan 2040? .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Routes, Customers Will Be Able to Use a New App to Flag Or Call the Next Available Bus to Alternate Pickup Locations
    T&E COMMITTEE #1-10 April 25, 2019 MEMORANDUM April 23, 2019 TO: County Councileo FROM: Glenn Orlin, Deputy Director SUBJECT: FYI 9-24 Capital Improvements Program (CIP): amendments FY20 Operating Budget: Department of Transportation (DOT), Vacuum Leaf Collection Fund, General Fund, and Mass Transit Fund; Homeowners' Association Road Maintenance Reimbursement NDA; Rockville Parking District NDA; Vision Zero NDA, and Snow Removal and Storm Cleanup NDA Supplemental Appropriation to the FY19 Operating Budget, Montgomery County Government: Snow Removal/Wind and Rain Storm Cleanup, Department of Transportation- $11,584,423; Department of General Services - $3,641,663 Supplemental Appropriation to the FY19 Capital Budget, Montgomery County Government: Resurfacing: Residential/Rural Roads - $3,885,000 PURPOSE: Develop recommendations on CIP amendments and on the above portions of the FY20 Operating Budget1 Those expected to attend this worksession include: Al Roshdieh, Director, DOT Emil Wolanin, Deputy Director, DOT Christopher Conklin, Deputy Director for Transportation Policy, DOT Tim Cupples, Chief, Division of Transportation Engineering, DOT Richard Dorsey, Chief, Division of Highway Services, DOT Dan Hibbert, Chief, Division of Transit Services, DOT Fred Lees, Chief, Management Services, DOT Michael Paylor, Chief, Division of Transportation Engineering and Operations, DOT Brady Goldsmith, Alison Dollar-Sibal, and Deborah Lambert, Budget Analysts, Office of Management and Budget (0MB) I. FY19-24 CIP: transportation amendments (except Parking Lot Districts) 1. Resurfacing: Residential/Rural Roads (©I-4). In January the Executive recommended accelerating $1 million from FY22 to FYI 9-for which he requested a supplemental appropriation-and accelerating $400,000 in FY23 and $ I million from FY24 to FY20. The six-year total would be unchanged.
    [Show full text]