DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relationship Between the Papacy and the Jews in Twelfth-Century Rome: Papal Attitudes Toward Biblical Judaism and Contemporary European Jewry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Relationship Between the Papacy and the Jews in Twelfth-Century Rome: Papal Attitudes Toward Biblical Judaism and Contemporary European Jewry Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 The elr ationship between the papacy and the Jews in twelfth-century Rome: papal attitudes toward biblical Judaism and contemporary european Jewry Marie Therese Champagne Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Champagne, Marie Therese, "The er lationship between the papacy and the Jews in twelfth-century Rome: papal attitudes toward biblical Judaism and contemporary european Jewry" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1931. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1931 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PAPACY AND THE JEWS IN TWELFTH-CENTURY ROME: PAPAL ATTITUDES TOWARD BIBLICAL JUDAISM AND CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN JEWRY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Marie Therese Champagne B.S.N., Southeastern Louisiana University, 1977 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1999 May, 2005 For my Father, Leo Pierre Champagne, Sr. (1921-2005), who gave me his integrity, his love, and his faith, and for my second Mother, Lorraine Edwards Champagne, who has steadfastly loved, supported, and encouraged me ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My mentors, friends, and family have provided me with invaluable support and inspiration. Dr. Maribel Dietz, my major professor, not only gave me her time, wisdom, knowledge, and insight, but also offered encouragement when the obstacles confronting me seemed insurmountable. Her belief in me and my abilities sustained and motivated me, and for that I will always be grateful. Professor Brenda Bolton generously translated portions of Latin texts, graciously facilitated my contacts with other scholars, and propelled me in my professional life through her faith in my work. Professor Kenneth Stow of Haifa University cheerfully and kindly offered encouragement and advice as my research progressed. The late Dr. Robert Edgeworth offered valuable corrections to my Latin translations in Chapter II until his untimely death in October of 2004. Dr. Edgeworth’s extraordinary kindness and humanity surpassed his incredible talents as a classicist and linguist. I am grateful to the scholars who offered their help after his death, including Dr. Mary Sirridge and Dr. Lauge Nielsen, and to those who translated portions of Latin inscriptions and Italian and German texts: Drs. Rex Stem, Steven Ross, Sarah Ross, and Anna Rocca. My friends, family, and colleagues have steadfastly stood with me on this journey through graduate school; I could not imagine succeeding in this goal without their help and support. My thanks extend especially to my brother Mike Champagne, and my friend Mary Ann Henchy. My fellow graduate student, Jean Anne Hayes Williams, generously listened and supported me through the most stressful moments. My children Tommy, Sarah, and Lauren, as always, remind me of what is most important in my life. iii PREFACE As the start of my graduate studies in history, in a graduate seminar in Art History, I read about the Treasures of the Temple of Herod, taken from Jerusalem in the first century CE, and lost to public notice after the sixth century. Textual mention of the Treasures re- emerged in an ecclesiastical text from a Lateran cleric in the late eleventh century. Fascinated with the history of the Catholic Church and Judaism and their relationship through the past two millennia, and confronted by seemingly endless popular publications about the Ark of the Covenant and mysterious secrets of the Church, I wondered what had actually happened to the Treasures and why that eleventh-century cleric suddenly promoted the idea that the Treasures were in the Lateran basilica. As I researched the subject, I decided to focus on the beliefs about the Treasures, and how those beliefs were utilized, not on whether the Treasures actually existed in the Middle Ages. That will probably never be known definitively. The story that emerged revealed that a particular relationship existed between the popes and the Roman Jews in the twelfth century, especially between 1145 and 1181. The Treasures formed an important component of biblical Judaism that was utilized by the papacy during that period. My investigation into that usage of the Temple Treasures by the popes, while they maintained a restrictive and protective relationship with the Jews, revealed an incredibly complex mosaic of papal attitudes toward the Jews and toward biblical Judaism. In light of the often tortuous journey that Christians and Jews have followed in their interactions and associations from the beginning of the Common Era, it is my wish that this dissertation will spur further research into that relationship in the latter twelfth century, a truly unique era in papal/Jewish relations. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………………….iii PREFACE……………………………………………………………………………………..iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………………………vi ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………..vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………..1 II FROM JERUSALEM TO ROME: THE ORIGIN, LOSS, AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TREASURES OF THE TEMPLE OF HEROD………………………………..16 The Origin of the Treasures and the Temple………………………………………18 The Final Destruction of the Temple and Transport of the Treasures to Rome…...29 The Papacy’s Claim to Possess the Temple Treasures…………………………….41 III CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH RELATIONS AND INTERACTIONS FROM THE CHURCH FATHERS TO THE TWELFTH-CENTURY POPES……………….…..58 The Relationship between Christianity and Judaism………………………….……60 The Relationship between the Papacy and the Jews………………….…...………..81 Twelfth-Century Christian/Jewish Contact…………………………………………86 IV POLITICAL AND DOCTRINAL INFLUENCES ON THE ATTITUDE OF EUGENIUS III TOWARD THE JEWS………………….…………………………..99 The Struggle between Church and Empire: The Reform Papacies……………….104 Papal Protection of the Jews: Sicut Judaeis……………………………………...113 Political Upheaval in Rome: 1130-1145………………………………………....124 Eugenius III: 1145-1153…………………………………………………………137 V CONTINUITY OF TRADITIONS AND ATTITUDES THROUGH ALEXANDER III: THE CHURCH’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF BIBLICAL JUDAISM……………………………………………………………………….…..159 The Holy Thursday Ritual and the Temple Treasures……………………………163 Alexander III: 1159-1181………………………………………………………..173 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..188 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………...198 APPENDIX: LIST OF POPES 1049-1216……………………………………………..…...216 VITA……….…………………………………….……………………………………….....217 v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BT Babylonian Talmud DBV Petrus Mallius, Descriptio basilicae Vaticanae DLE Descriptio Lateranensis ecclesiae Gesta Albinus, Gesta pauperis scolaris HIS Nicolaus Maniacutius, Historia Imaginis Salvatoris Lib. Cens. Cencius, Liber Censuum Lib. pol. Benedict, Liber Politicus LP Duchesne, Liber Pontificalis MGH Monumenta Germania Historiae SS Scriptores Const. Constitutiones MUR Benedict, Mirabilia Urbis Romae Ordo Bernard, Ordo officiorum ecclesiae Lateranensis PL Migne, Patrologia cursus completus. Series latina Regesta Jaffé, Regesta Pontificum Romanorum Sacrorum cons. Mansi, Sacrorum consiliorum nova, et amplissima collectio Vulg. Vulgate vi ABSTRACT The relationship of the papacy to the Jews in the Middle Ages, which had developed under the influences of Patristic writers, Roman law, and papal precedent, was marked in the twelfth century by toleration and increasing restriction, but also by papal protection. Between the First Crusade massacres of Jews and the restrictions and persecutions of the thirteenth century, the twelfth century is set apart as a unique era in the lives of European Jews. As Eugenius III (1145-1153) and Alexander III (1159-1181) extended their protection to the Jews of Rome and perhaps all of Christendom through the papal document Sicut Judaeis, and simultaneously proclaimed Christianity’s doctrinal superiority over Judaism, the Roman Jews also acknowledged the pope as their temporal lord and ruler in Rome through their presentation of the Torah. Other motivations for that contractual relationship perhaps existed, including the popes’ need for financial backing. Eugenius III and Alexander III lived in exile through much of their reigns and struggled to maintain control of the Patrimony, a major source of papal revenues. During the same era, Eugenius III and Alexander III publicly promoted the Church’s inheritance of biblical Judaism in the claim that the Treasures of the Temple of Herod existed in the Lateran basilica. Lateran texts, special liturgical rituals, and papal processions through Rome reinforced that claim. At the same time, the attitudinal influences of the Cistercians Nicolaus Maniacutius and Bernard of Clairvaux on Eugenius, and the Jewish steward Jechiel in the papal household on Alexander, cannot be measured definitively but suggest a paradoxical relationship with the Jews. The history of continuing papal conflicts with the Roman Commune and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa confirms that Eugenius
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Times (A.D
    The Catholic Faith History of Catholicism A Brief History of Catholicism (Excerpts from Catholicism for Dummies) Ancient Times (A.D. 33-741) Non-Christian Rome (33-312) o The early Christians (mostly Jews who maintained their Jewish traditions) o Jerusalem’s religious establishment tolerated the early Christians as a fringe element of Judaism o Christianity splits into its own religion . Growing number of Gentile converts (outnumbered Jewish converts by the end of the first century) . Greek and Roman cultural influences were adapted into Christianity . Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (resulted in the final and formal expulsion of the Christians from Judaism) o The Roman persecutions . The first period (A.D. 68-117) – Emperor Nero blamed Christians for the burning of Rome . The second period (A.D. 117-192) – Emperors were less tyrannical and despotic but the persecutions were still promoted . The third period (A.D. 193-313) – Persecutions were the most virulent, violent, and atrocious during this period Christian Rome (313-475) o A.D. 286 Roman Empire split between East and West . Constantinople – formerly the city of Byzantium and now present- day Istanbul . Rome – declined in power and prestige during the barbarian invasions (A.D. 378-570) while the papacy emerged as the stable center of a chaotic world o Roman Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 which legalized Christianity – it was no longer a capital crime to be Christian o A.D. 380 Christianity became the official state religion – Paganism was outlawed o The Christian Patriarchs (Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople) .
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology Translation of L
    Ludwig Neidhart: Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology translation of L. Neidhart, Biblische Trinitätslehre und Christologie, published on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/Trinitaet.html, 2017, translated by the author, published online on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/downloads/TrinityChristology.pdf, 2017, © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Hannover 1990 (original German Version), © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2017 (extended German Version and English translation, both issued on September 15, 2017) Contents: 1. Unity in Essence and Personal Distinction between Father and Son.......................................................3 2. The Unity in Essence between the Father and the Son: Ten Biblical Arguments...................................8 3. The Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost...................................................................................................................18 4. The Triune God...........................................................................................................................................21 5. Trinity and Incarnation..............................................................................................................................29 6. Development of the Doctrine of Trinity and Incarnation.......................................................................31 7. Summary and Graphic Presentation of the Concepts of Trinity and Incarnation...............................48 8. Discussion: Is the Son subordinated to the Father?................................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Forerunners to the Reformation
    { Lecture 19 } FORERUNNERS TO THE REFORMATION * * * * * Long before Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the Wittenberg Door, there were those who recognized the corruption within the Roman Catholic Church and the need for major reform. Generally speaking, these men attempted to stay within the Catholic system rather than attempting to leave the church (as the Protestant Reformers later would do). The Waldensians (1184–1500s) • Waldo (or Peter Waldo) lived from around 1140 to 1218. He was a merchant from Lyon. But after being influenced by the story of the fourth-century Alexius (a Christian who sold all of his belongings in devotion to Christ), Waldo sold his belongings and began a life of radical service to Christ. • By 1170, Waldo had surrounded himself with a group of followers known as the Poor Men of Lyon, though they would later become known as Waldensians. • The movement was denied official sanction by the Roman Catholic Church (and condemned at the Third Lateran Council in 1179). Waldo was excommunicated by Pope Lucius III in 1184, and the movement was again condemned at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. • Waldensians were, therefore, persecuted by the Roman Catholics as heretics. However, the movement survived (even down to the present) though the Waldensians were often forced into hiding in the Alps. • The Waldensian movement was characterized by (1) voluntary poverty (though Waldo taught that salvation was not restricted to those who gave up their wealth), (2) lay preaching, and (2) the authority of the Bible (translated in the language of the people) over any other authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Babylonian Captivity ( 1520 ) Erik Herrmann
    The Babylonian Captivity ( 1520 ) Erik Herrmann Lutheran Quarterly, Volume 34, Number 1, Spring 2020, pp. 71-81 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2020.0002 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/751529 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] COMMENT: ANOTHER QUINCENTENNIAL The Babylonian Captivity (1520) by Erik Herrmann y the waters of Babylon we sit down and weep, when we “Bremember thee, O Zion. On the willows there we hang up our lyres” (Ps. 137:1). Overcome with grief, Israel could not sing for their captors. They were at a loss for words. Apparently this was not a problem for Luther. Luther would sing—he would sing high and loud and the captors would know that there still was a God in Israel. “I know another little song about Rome and the Romanists. If their ears are itching to hear it, I will sing that one to them, too—and pitch it in the highest key!” Babylon was a powerful trope. The Apocalypse made it a symbol of all the decadence and prolificacy of the kingdoms of the earth, that wicked harlot of the world. In the City of God, Augustine had identified it with the worldliness of the city of man which was also epitomized by pagan Rome. Petrarch, disgusted by the worldliness of the papacy in Avignon and the consequent influence of the French crown on the Roman church, called to mind the ancient Chal- dean captivity so that Avignon was the new “Babylon of the west,” holding the rest of the church hostage to its excesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Events of the Reformation Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution
    May 20, 2018 Events of the Reformation Protestants and Roman Catholics agree on first 5 centuries. What changed? Why did some in the Church want reform by the 16th century? Outline Why the Reformation? 1. Church becomes powerful institution. 2. Additional teaching and practices were added. 3. People begin questioning the Church. 4. Martin Luther’s protest. Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution Evidence of Rome’s power grab • In 2nd century we see bishops over regions; people looked to them for guidance. • Around 195AD there was dispute over which day to celebrate Passover (14th Nissan vs. Sunday) • Polycarp said 14th Nissan, but now Victor (Bishop of Rome) liked Sunday. • A council was convened to decide, and they decided on Sunday. • But bishops of Asia continued the Passover on 14th Nissan. • Eusebius wrote what happened next: “Thereupon Victor, who presided over the church at Rome, immediately attempted to cut off from the common unity the parishes of all Asia, with the churches that agreed with them, as heterodox [heretics]; and he wrote letters and declared all the brethren there wholly excommunicate.” (Eus., Hist. eccl. 5.24.9) Everyone started looking to Rome to settle disputes • Rome was always ending up on the winning side in their handling of controversial topics. 1 • So through a combination of the fact that Rome was the most important city in the ancient world and its bishop was always right doctrinally then everyone started looking to Rome. • So Rome took that power and developed it into the Roman Catholic Church by the 600s. Church granted power to rule • Constantine gave the pope power to rule over Italy, Jerusalem, Constantinople and Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Look at Passover
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program 1977 A Brief Look at Passover Jon Potest Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, History Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Potest, Jon, "A Brief Look at Passover" (1977). Honors Theses. 270. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/270 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OUACHITA BAPTIST UN I VERS ITY A BRIEF' LOOK AT PASS OVER HONORIs PROJECT BY JON POTEET MAY 25 , 1977 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this paper is to oriefly examine the tradition of the Passover in light of its origins , histor­ icization and historical development, and its relevance t the Christology expressed in the New Testament gospels. It is necessary to realize from the beginning that in some cases the traditions being dealt with are ancient, and therefore there is scant concrete evidence with which to deal. How­ ever, I feel that one can deal with what evidence there is available and realize that his conclusions must be somewhat tentative. 1 ' I. ORIGINS AND EARLY HISTORY When one looks at the traditions of the Passover in the biblical materials it becomes apparent that the feast originally consisted of two elements, these being pesach and mazzoth. 1 For purpos~s of study I propose to look at the two elements separately and then later look at how they came to be joined together.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Vatican the Papacy: Is the Pope King?
    Inside the Vatican The Papacy: Is the Pope King? Misconceptions 1. The Pope cannot sin 2. Everything the Pope says is infallible 3. Catholics worship the Pope 4. Pope is a dictator Definition of Infallibility Infallible 1. Incapable of error; not liable to deceive or mislead 2. Absolutely trustworthy or sure Applies to the Papacy VS. Impeccable: 1. faultless; flawless; irreproachable 2. not liable to sin; incapable of sin. Does NOT apply to the Papacy Three Requirements for Infallibility 1. The pronouncement must be made by the official successor to Peter. 2. The subject matter must be in the area of faith and morals. 3. The Pope must be speaking ex cathedra (from the chair) of Peter, and must be intending to proclaim a doctrine that binds the entire Church to assent. Apostolic Succession “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven” Mt. 16:19 Therefore his definitions, of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, are justly held irreformable, for they are pronounced with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, an assistance promised to him in blessed Peter." - Second Vatican Council The Holy Spirit’s Role Jesus Christ is the Head of the Church The Holy Spirit guides the Church "When the Spirit of truth comes He will guide you to all truth” –John 16:13 “So that she can fulfill her mission, the Holy Spirit ‘bestows upon the Church varied hierarchic and charismatic gifts, and in this way directs her’” CCC 768 Ex Cathedra “From the chair” in Latin “Jesus spoke of the authority of the Old Testament magisterium saying, ‘The scribes and the Pharisees have taken their seat on the chair of Moses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St
    NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome About NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome Title: NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.html Author(s): Jerome, St. Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Freemantle, M.A., The Hon. W.H. (Translator) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Public Domain Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome St. Jerome Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 Title Page.. p. 2 Translator©s Preface.. p. 3 Prolegomena to Jerome.. p. 4 Introductory.. p. 4 Contemporary History.. p. 4 Life of Jerome.. p. 10 The Writings of Jerome.. p. 22 Estimate of the Scope and Value of Jerome©s Writings.. p. 26 Character and Influence of Jerome.. p. 32 Chronological Tables of the Life and Times of St. Jerome A.D. 345-420.. p. 33 The Letters of St. Jerome.. p. 40 To Innocent.. p. 40 To Theodosius and the Rest of the Anchorites.. p. 44 To Rufinus the Monk.. p. 44 To Florentius.. p. 48 To Florentius.. p. 49 To Julian, a Deacon of Antioch.. p. 50 To Chromatius, Jovinus, and Eusebius.. p. 51 To Niceas, Sub-Deacon of Aquileia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatius of Aquileia: Marian Ecclesiologist Vincent R
    Marian Library Studies Volume 10 Article 4 1978 Chromatius of Aquileia: Marian Ecclesiologist Vincent R. Vasey Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/ml_studies Recommended Citation Vasey, Vincent R. (1978) "Chromatius of Aquileia: Marian Ecclesiologist," Marian Library Studies: Vol. 10, Article 4, Pages 27-36. Available at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/ml_studies/vol10/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Library Studies by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CliROMATIUS OF AQUILEIA: MARIAN ECCLESIOLOGIST Cardinal Journet in his monumental work on the Church makes the acute observation, in which Karl Barth concurs, that Mariology and ec­ clesiology run parallel, so that one's Mariology images his ecclesiology and vice versa. He points out that the fundamental differences between Prot­ estant and Catholic views on these two key phases of theology arise from the divergent conceptions of justification and grace held by the Catholic Church and the Churches of the Reform.1 Chromatius of Aquileia exemplifies the principle enunciated by Mon­ sieur Journet. When Chromatius evokes Mary he associates her with the Church. His contribution to Mariology and ecclesiology is highlighted by Pope Paul VI in Marialis Cultus. The Pope climaxes his own harmonies of Mariology and ecclesiology in Marian devotion, p·ractice and doctrine with a citation from Chromatius (Sermo XXX, 1), showing how the love of Christians for the Church develops their love for Mary and their love for Mary blends with their love for the Church.2 Chromatius, the tenth bishop of Aquileia, did not write much.
    [Show full text]
  • Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2011 Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C. Skinner D. Morgan Davis Carl Griffin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Skinner, Andrew C.; Davis, D. Morgan; and Griffin,a C rl, "Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown" (2011). Maxwell Institute Publications. 17. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. bountiful harvest bountiful harvest essays in honor of s. kent brown Edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin Cover design by Stephen Hales Creative, Inc. Frontispiece by Mark A. Philbrick Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 maxwellinstitute.byu.edu © 2011 The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bountiful harvest : essays in honor of S. Kent Brown / edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8425-2804-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology. 2. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I. Brown, S. Kent. II. Skinner, Andrew C., 1951- III.
    [Show full text]