Roy E. Trask B-17 Bomber Crew

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roy E. Trask B-17 Bomber Crew Roy E. Trask B-17 Bomber Crew L-R: Front Crew Chief: Marshall O. Johnson Middle: Emil Wilke wg, Charles Krone bt, Carl Nuessen eng, Joseph Belker ro, and Elmer Wilke tg. Back: Roy Trask P, George Kerr B, John Morere CP and Guy Lateano N. Compiled December 2017 by Randolph B. Woolley 410 W. Sunset Road Lookout Mountain, TN 37350 (423) 821-5736 [email protected] i ii Table of Contents Roy E. Trask B-17 Bomber Crew ..................................................................................... i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. iii Gratefully Dedicated To: ................................................................................................. vi Preface .............................................................................................................................. vii Introduction .................................................................................................................... viii 306th Bomb Group ............................................................................................................ ix Bombardier’s Story .......................................................................................................... 1 Basic Indoctrination Training ......................................................................................... 3 Pre-Flight Training ........................................................................................................... 4 Army Air Forces Classification Center - Nashville ....................................................... 5 Aerial Gunner’s School – Harlingen Army Air Field ................................................... 7 Flexible Gunnery Training........................................................................................... 7 West Texas Bombardier Quadrangle - Childress, Texas ............................................ 11 Bombardier Training.................................................................................................. 11 Dyersburg Army Air Base.............................................................................................. 18 The Roy E. Trask B-17 Bomber Crew .......................................................................... 18 Kearney Army Air Field ................................................................................................ 20 Bomb Bay of Blues (43-38285) ....................................................................................... 21 Roy E. Trask Crew Get Orders to Ship Overseas ....................................................... 23 Northern Route ............................................................................................................... 27 Combat Crew Replacement Unit – Bovingdon ............................................................ 27 RAF Bovingdon - USAAF Station No 112 .................................................................... 28 Example of Pre-Combat Training ................................................................................. 28 Preparation For Combat ............................................................................................ 28 Typical Raid Procedures ............................................................................................ 32 To the Target and Back .............................................................................................. 34 Assignment to 369th BS/306th BG ................................................................................... 40 1. Eisenbach, Germany September 11, 1944 ................................................................ 44 2. Ruhland, Germany September 12, 1944 ................................................................... 50 3. Volkel, Holland September 17, 1944 ......................................................................... 53 4. Frankfurt, Germany September 25, 1944................................................................. 55 5. Cologne, Germany September 27, 1944 .................................................................... 57 6. Magdeburg, Germany September 28, 1944 .............................................................. 59 7. Munster, Germany September 30, 1944 ................................................................... 62 8. Kassel, Germany October 2, 1944 ............................................................................. 64 9. Koblenz, Germany October 5, 1944 .......................................................................... 68 10. Stralsund, Germany October 6, 1944 ...................................................................... 72 11. Ruhland, Germany October 7, 1944 ....................................................................... 75 12. Cologne, Germany October 15, 1944 ...................................................................... 80 13. Cologne, Germany October 17, 1944 ...................................................................... 85 14. Mannheim, Germany October 19, 1944 .................................................................. 89 15. Hanover, Germany October 22, 1944 ..................................................................... 92 16. Hamburg, Germany October 25, 1944 .................................................................... 96 iii 17. Bielefeld, Germany October 26, 1944 ..................................................................... 99 18. Munster, Germany October 30, 1944 .................................................................... 103 19. Hamburg, Germany November 4, 1944 ................................................................ 108 20. Frankfurt, Germany November 5, 1944 ............................................................... 112 21. Hamburg, Germany November 6, 1944 ................................................................ 116 22. Merseberg, Germany November 8, 1944 .............................................................. 120 23. Metz, France November 9, 1944 ............................................................................ 124 24. Eschweiler, Germany November 16, 1944 ............................................................ 128 George S. Patton Letter of Appreciation ................................................................ 132 25. Meppen, Germany November 21, 1944................................................................. 134 26. Misburg, Germany November 29, 1944 ................................................................ 137 27. Gera, Germany November 30, 1944 ...................................................................... 142 28. Koblenz, Germany December 2, 1944 ................................................................... 145 Berlin, Germany December 5, 1944 – Aborted .......................................................... 150 29. Stuttgart, Germany December 9, 1944 ................................................................. 153 Messenger A-70 Airfield ........................................................................................... 157 30. Kassel, Germany December 15, 1944 .................................................................... 161 31. Kaiserslautern, Germany December 18, 1944 ...................................................... 164 32. Nidda, Germany December 24, 1944..................................................................... 171 33. Koblenz, Germany December 28, 1944 ................................................................. 177 34. Bingen, Germany December 29, 1944 ................................................................... 182 Hermulhelm, Germany January 3, 1944 – Aborted .................................................. 188 35. Cologne, Germany January 14, 1944 .................................................................... 190 36. Frieburg, Germany January 15, 1944 ................................................................... 195 Roy E. Trask, Pilot, Thirty Five Combat Missions .................................................... 200 Aircraft Flown By Lt. Roy E. Trask ........................................................................... 202 J. S. Belker, Radio Operator, Thirty Five Combat Missions .................................... 203 Carl H. Nuessen, Top Turret Gunner/Engineer, Thirty Five Combat Missions .... 204 C. C. Krone, Ball Turret Gunner, Thirty Five Combat Missions ............................ 205 Emil R. Wilke, Waist Gunner, Thirty Five Combat Missions .................................. 206 37. Bielefeld, Germany January 17, 1944 ................................................................... 207 George T. Kerr Jr, Bombardier, Thirty Five Combat Missions .............................. 212 Elmer R. Wilke, Tail Gunner, Thirty Five Combat Missions .................................. 214 38. Koblenz, Germany January 29, 1944 .................................................................... 215 39. Mannheim, Germany February 1, 1944 ............................................................... 220 40. Berlin, Germany February 3, 1944 ....................................................................... 224 Guy J Lateano, Navigator, Thirty One Missions ....................................................... 230 41. Hamburg, Germany February 24, 1944 ............................................................... 233 42. Berlin, Germany February 26, 1944 ..................................................................... 237 43. Leipzig, Germany February
Recommended publications
  • Nachhaltiges Kommunales Flächenmanagement Der Weg in Eine Zukunftsfähige Stadtentwicklung
    Nachhaltiges kommunales Flächenmanagement Der Weg in eine zukunftsfähige Stadtentwicklung Modellprojekt 2008 – 2010 Grundlagen, Fazit und Perspektiven Gefördert durch: © LAG 21 NRW e.V. 2010 Übersicht 1 Flächenmanagement als neue Herausforderung 5 2 Das Modellprojekt 10 3 Ergebnisse - beispielhaft 18 4 Erfahrungen der Projektkommunen – Ergebnisse der Befragung 24 5 Perspektiven 26 LAG 21 NRW e.V. 2 Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Agenda 21 NRW e.V. Nachhaltigkeit ist unser Thema Netzwerk Nachhaltigkeit 120 Kommunen, Kreise, Verbände, Initiativen Arbeitsfelder Professionalisierung Agenda 21-Prozesse Bildung für Nachhaltige Entwicklung Nachhaltigkeitsmanagementsysteme Forschung LAG 21 NRW e.V. 3 Nachhaltiges kommunales Flächenmanagement als neue Herausforderung Das Nachhaltige kommunale Flächenmanagement verknüpft Lösungs- ansätze zu aktuellen Herausforderungen der Städte und Gemeinden: flächenschonende Stadtentwicklung kosteneffiziente Nutzung der Infrastrukturen Bewältigung des demografischen Wandels. In Deutschland werden täglich nahezu 100 ha Böden neu für Siedlungs- und Verkehrsfläche in Anspruch genommen. Grundgesetzlich verankert ist, ist die kommunale Planungshoheit bei der Einführung eines Nachhaltigen Kommunalen Flächenmanagementsystems zu berücksichtigen. LAG 21 NRW e.V. 4 Nachhaltiges kommunales Flächenmanagement als neue Herausforderung Beitrag zur systematischen Verankerung des Leitbilds Nachhaltigkeit in der kommunalen Flächenplanung Infrastrukturkostenentlastung, Standortqualität, Ökonomie Wettbewerbsvorteil Bewältigung
    [Show full text]
  • Lärmaktionsplanung, 3. Stufe, Überprüfung
    KURZ UND FISCHER GmbH ▪ Brückenstraße 9 ▪ 71364 Winnenden KURZ UND FISCHER GmbH Brückenstraße 9 Verbandsbauamt Plochingen 71364 Winnenden Abt. Hochbau Fon: 0 71 95 . 91 47 – 0 Schulstraße 5 Fax: 0 71 95 . 91 47 – 10 73207 Plochingen Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.kurz-fischer.de 17.03.2020 12597/Ku/gb Lärmaktionsplanung 3. Stufe, Überprüfung LAP Plochingen Gutachterliche Stellungnahme 1. Aufgabenstellung Die Europäische Union (EU) hat im Jahr 2002 die Richtlinie 2002/49/EG [1] (EU- Umgebungslärmrichtlinie) verabschiedet. Mit dieser Richtlinie sollte ein gemeinsames Konzept festgelegt werden, um schädliche Auswirkungen durch Umgebungslärm zu verhindern, ihnen vorzubeugen und diese zu mindern. Die EU-Umgebungslärm- richtlinie [1] ist die Basis für die Lärmminderungsplanung auf nationaler Ebene und wurde mit dem Gesetz zur Umsetzung der EU-Umgebungslärmrichtlinie [2] in deut- sches Recht überführt, der § 47 des BImSchG [3] zur Lärmminderungsplanung wurde dadurch novelliert. Entsprechend diesen gesetzlichen Vorgaben hat der GVV Plochingen den Lärmakti- onsplan der 1. Stufe mit Stand vom 28. Januar 2013 verabschiedet. Dieser wurde im Zuge der 2. Stufe der Lärmaktionsplanung am 13. Dezember 2017 [4] überarbeitet. Die Erstellung dieser Lärmaktionspläne wurde anhand eigener detaillierter Berechnungen durchgeführt. In diese Betrachtungen sind neben den vom Land kartierten Hauptver- kehrsstraßen (Bundes- und Landesstraßen) auch sonstige Straßen (Kreis- und Gemein- destraßen) eingeflossen, d. h. der Detaillierungsgrad der Untersuchungen war deutlich größer als die der Lärmkartierung des Landes. [1] Richtlinie 2002/49/EG, vom 25. Juni 2002 über die Bewertung und Bekämpfung von Umgebungslärm (EU- Umgebungslärmrichtlinie 2002/49/EG) [2] Gesetz zur Umsetzung der EG-Richtlinie über die Bewertung und Bekämpfung von Umgebungslärm vom 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany to the Draft Final Audit Report Were Received in a Letter Dated April 19, 2006, Which Is Included As an Addendum to the Final Report
    , United States Food Safety liTashington.D.C'. a Department of and Inspection 20250 Agriculture Sen ice Dr. Antje Jaensch Deputy Head of L'nit Unit I06 Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety Diedersdorfer Weg 1 12277 Berlin - Mariendorf Gern~any Dear Dr. Jaensch: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) conducted an on-site audit of the Gern~anmeat il:spectior, syster,: from Nover;.,ber 24 thrOUgE,December 20, 2005. EEclosed is 3 Of tile final audit report. Comments from Germany to the draft final audit report were received in a letter dated April 19, 2006, which is included as an addendum to the final report. If you have any questions regarding the FSIS audit, please contact me at telephone (202) 720- 378 1. You may also reach me at my facsimile number (202) 690-4040 or e-mail address (sally.\\bite@ fsis.usda.gov). Sincerely, Saliy White Director Internatiot~alEquivalence Staff Office of International Affairs Enclosure FSIS Form 2630-916861 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES Dr. Antje Jaensch cc: William Westman, Minister Counselor, US Embassy. Bonn Friedrich it'acker, Agricultural Counselor. Embassy of Germany Norval Francis, Minister Counselor, US Mission to the EU.Brussels Canice Nolan, EC Mission to the US, Washington. DC Scott Bleggi, FAS Area Ofticer Barbara Masters, Administrator, FSIS Linda Swacina, Executive Director, FSIA, 01'4 Karen Stuck, Assistant Administrator, OIA William James, Deputy Asst. Administrator, OIA Donald Smart, Director, Review Staff, OPEER Clark Danford, Director, IEPS, OIA Sally White, Director, IES, OIA Mary Stanley, Director, IID, OIA Barbara McNiff, Director, FSIS Codex Progranls Staff Gerald Zimstein, IES, OIA Amy Winton, State Department rnulltry File (Gern~anyFY 2006 .Anni.~al.At~dit) FINAL REPORT OF AN AUDIT CANED OUT IN GERMANY COVERING GERMANY'S MEAT INSPECTION SYSTEM I- ood Safety and Inspection Senice LTnitedStates Department of Agriculture TA4BLEOF CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • “Research in Germany“ the Rig - Campaign
    “Research in Germany“ The RiG - Campaign ▪ Initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) since 2006 ▪ Promoting Germany as a location for research and innovation What the RiG Campaign aims at… ▪ Increasing the visibility of Germany as a research location and providing information abroad ▪ Attracting excellent researchers on different academic career stages ▪ Expanding and strengthening scientific collaborations between Germany and international partners ▪ Marketing support for German institutions “Research in Germany” member institutions Humboldt German Academic Foundation Exchange Service ▪ Vast alumni network and ▪ Self-governing German ambassador scientists around the organization body of the world universities ▪ Fellowhips and awards for foreign ▪ Scholarships and fellowships for postdocs and senior scientists students and scientists ▪ Brazil: Capes-Humboldt ▪ Higher Education Cooperations fellowship programme for postdocs and senior scientists German Research Foundation Fraunhofer Society ▪ Research institution ▪ Largest German funding agency ▪ Interface between research and ▪ Funding for projects and cooperations Companies (innovation) ▪ Strong interaction with scientists ▪ Contract research for industry ▪ Executive Organisation of the „Excellence and government Initiative“ and „Excellence Strategy“ Pillars of the German research sector Universities (HEIs) Non-university Industrial research research institutes Klauser /DAAD Gombert © Presseamt Münster/Angelika © PresseamtMünster/Angelika Volker Lannert/DAAD
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study North Rhine-Westphalia
    Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.020 concerning the ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000‐2006 co‐financed by the European Regional Development Fund (Objectives 1 and 2) Work Package 4 “Structural Change and Globalisation” CASE STUDY NORTH RHINE‐WESTPHALIA (DE) Prepared by Christian Hartmann (Joanneum Research) for: European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Policy Development Evaluation Unit CSIL, Centre for Industrial Studies, Milan, Italy Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria Technopolis Group, Brussels, Belgium In association with Nordregio, the Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden KITE, Centre for Knowledge, Innovation, Technology and Enterprise, Newcastle, UK Case Study – North Rhine‐Westphalia (DE) Acronyms BERD Business Expenditure on R&D DPMA German Patent and Trade Mark Office ERDF European Regional Development Fund ESF European Social Fund EU European Union GERD Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D GDP Gross Domestic Product GRP Gross Regional Product GVA Gross Value Added ICT Information and Communication Technology IWR Institute of the Renewable Energy Industry LDS State Office for Statistics and Data Processing NGO Non‐governmental Organisation NPO Non‐profit Organisation NRW North Rhine‐Westphalia NUTS Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics PPS Purchasing Power Standard REN Rational Energy Use and Exploitation of Renewable Resources R&D Research and Development RTDI Research, Technological Development and Innovation SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPD Single Programming Document
    [Show full text]
  • Interreg I / Ii : Cross-Border Cooperation
    INTERREG I / II : CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION Euregio Meuse-Rhine: implementation and management in practice Speech by Mr K.H. Lambertz - Chair of the Monitoring Committee for the Euregio Meuse-Rhine Interreg Programme - Director of Euregio Meuse-Rhine - Minister-President of the German-speaking community of Belgium 1. General background and geographical situation In 1974, the governors of the Dutch and Belgian provinces of Limburg, together with the Chief Executive of the Cologne county administration, acted on the proposal made to them by the future Queen of the Netherlands, Princess Beatrix, during an official visit to Maastricht, to draw up draft arrangements for an association under which even closer cross-border collaboration could develop, along the lines of the Dutch-German Euregio project that had been running since 1957. This initiative was part of the new Community direction in regional policy, which in 1975 was to be provided with an instrument to assist economic development called the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). In 1976, the principle of cross-border institutions was passed in law. Initially formed as an ad hoc association, the Euregio Meuse-Rhine was designed to promote integration between inhabitants on each side of the national borders. The area covers: • in Holland: the southern part of the Dutch province of Limburg; • in Germany: the city of Aachen, and the districts of Aachen, Heinsberg, Düren and Euskirchen, which make up the Aachen Regio, and • in Belgium: the entire province of Limburg. The province of Liège joined the Euregio Meuse-Rhine in 1978. In 1992, the German-speaking community of Belgium became the fifth partner in the Euregio Meuse- Rhine.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtsblatt Ausgabe Nr. 02 2021
    Amt_02_2015.qxp 06.01.2015 12:31 Seite 9 139 Amtsblatt GG 12941294 für den Regierungsbezirk Köln Amtsblatt-Abo online Info unter http://www.boehm.de/amtsblatt Herausgeber: Bezirksregierung Köln 195.201. Jahrgang Jahrgang Köln,Köln, 12.11. JanuarJanuar 20152021 NummerNummer 2 2 Inhaltsangabe:Inhaltsangabe: B Verordnungen,Verordnungen, 18.12. Aufgebot23. Änderung eines desSparkassenbuches Regionalplans Köln, Teilabschnitt Region VerfügungenVerfügungen undund Bekanntmachungen hier:Aachen Kreissparkasse– Festlegung eines Euskirchen Gewerbe- und IndustrieansiedlungsSeite 15- der Bezirksregierung der Bezirksregierung 19. Kraftloserklärungbereiches für zweckgebundene eines Sparkassenbuches regionale gewerbliche und in- hier:dustrielle Stadtsparkasse Nutzungen GIBregional, Wermelskirchen Stadt Düren und GemeindeSeite 15 16.8. SatzungBekanntmachung des Schulzweckverbandes der Ernennung Aldenhoven-Linnich der Kreiswahlleiter/innen für die Niederzier Seite 21 interkommunaleund ihrer Stellvertreter/innen Gesamtschule für Aldenhoven-Linnich die Bundestagswahl 2021Seite 9 Seite 14 E13. 24. Änderung desSonstige Regionalplans Mitteilungen Köln, Teilabschnitt Region C Rechtsvorschriften und Aachen – Festlegung eines Gewerbe- und Industrieansiedlungs- 9. 06. Änderung des Regionalplanes Köln, Teilabschnitt Region 20. Liquidation Bekanntmachungen anderer Behörden hier:bereiches, „Die Stadt Insel“ Geilenkirchen – Verein für Qualifizierung und Beschäfti- Seite 23 Bonn/Rhein-Sieg – undUmwandlung Dienststellen eines Allgemeinen Siedlungs- bereiches (ASB) in einen
    [Show full text]
  • German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE,WASHINGTON,DC REFERENCE GUIDE 24 GERMAN JEWS IN THE UNITED STATES: AGUIDE TO ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS Contents INTRODUCTION &ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 ABOUT THE EDITOR 6 ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS (arranged alphabetically by state and then city) ALABAMA Montgomery 1. Alabama Department of Archives and History ................................ 7 ARIZONA Phoenix 2. Arizona Jewish Historical Society ........................................................ 8 ARKANSAS Little Rock 3. Arkansas History Commission and State Archives .......................... 9 CALIFORNIA Berkeley 4. University of California, Berkeley: Bancroft Library, Archives .................................................................................................. 10 5. Judah L. Mages Museum: Western Jewish History Center ........... 14 Beverly Hills 6. Acad. of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Margaret Herrick Library, Special Coll. ............................................................................ 16 Davis 7. University of California at Davis: Shields Library, Special Collections and Archives ..................................................................... 16 Long Beach 8. California State Library, Long Beach: Special Collections ............. 17 Los Angeles 9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Library: Special Collections ...............18 10. UCLA Film and Television Archive .................................................. 18 11. USC: Doheny Memorial Library, Lion Feuchtwanger Archive ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unmistakably
    DEUTZINSIDE The magazine of DEUTZ AG Edition 3 I 2011 Unmistakably: The new corporate philosophy of DEUTZ AG: An interview with Management Board members, Dr Helmut Leube and Dr Margarete Haase INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY TRADE FAIRS DEUTZ clears the way A great show for DEUTZ CONTENTS EDITORIAL nEws FAsCinatiOn & VisiOn Dear Readers Page 12 News and information “I have called the thing It has been a strong year for from around DEUTZ ............. Page 4 a suspension railway” DEUTZ AG. With a total value DEUTZ co-founder, Eugen of 1,169 million euros, the le- 75th anniversary at Henkelhausen Langen, is the “Father” vel of orders grew by 18.5 per DEUTZ partner Henkelhausen of the Wuppertal suspension cent in the first nine months of GmbH & Co.KG celebrates railway .................................... Page 22 the year 2011 compared with its anniversary ......................... Page 7 the same period in the previ- PEOPlE & MARkETs ous year. Sales are also looking World premiere in Las Vegas very impressive: in the period Hamm AG presents the Russian etiquette is different! from January to September first road roller with Business customs and how 2011 we sold 168,508 engines Tier 4i technology ................... Page 8 to behave in Moscow, and were able to see increased St. Petersburg and growth over and against the previous year of around 45 per cent. In line with this, there was a No compromises Nowosibirsk ............................ Page 24 clear growth in turnover at 1123.5 million euros. With 69.4 million euros, we were even able to Interview with Heinz Schmidt, triple our operating profit (EBIT before one-off items) compared with 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Axis Advances
    wh07_te_ch17_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 568 Monday, March 12, 2007 2:32WH07MOD_se_CH17_s02_s.fm PM Page 568 Monday, January 29, 2007 6:01 PM Step-by-Step German fighter plane SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Objectives Janina’s War Story As you teach this section, keep students “ It was 10:30 in the morning and I was helping my focused on the following objectives to help mother and a servant girl with bags and baskets as them answer the Section Focus Question they set out for the market. Suddenly the high- and master core content. pitch scream of diving planes caused everyone to 2 freeze. Countless explosions shook our house ■ Describe how the Axis powers came to followed by the rat-tat-tat of strafing machine control much of Europe, but failed to guns. We could only stare at each other in horror. conquer Britain. Later reports would confirm that several German Janina Sulkowska in ■ Summarize Germany’s invasion of the the early 1930s Stukas had screamed out of a blue sky and . Soviet Union. dropped several bombs along the main street— and then returned to strafe the market. The carnage ■ Understand the horror of the genocide was terrible. the Nazis committed. —Janina Sulkowska,” Krzemieniec, Poland, ■ Describe the role of the United States September 12, 1939 before and after joining World War II. Focus Question Which regions were attacked and occupied by the Axis powers, and what was life like under their occupation? Prepare to Read The Axis Advances Build Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Diplomacy and compromise had not satisfied the Axis powers’ Remind students that the German attack • Describe how the Axis powers came to control hunger for empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrinking German Cities -The Cases of Halle and Gelsenkirchen
    Master Thesis Shrinking German cities -The cases of Halle and Gelsenkirchen- Author: Nora Kaminski Supervisor: Jan-Evert Nilsson Tutor: Alina Lidén Submitted to Blekinge Tekniska Högskola for the Master of European Spatial Planning and Regional Development on the 13/04/2012 Abstract The thesis researches the reasons of shrinking cities, especially the impact of deindustrialisation, in Germany using the example of Halle and Gelsenkirchen. Additionally, the policy response towards this phenomenon in terms of urban consolidation in the cities is posed. For doing that, the economic history of the towns is investigated and simultaneously the development of population and of unemployment is researched, as they are closely connected to the economy. With an analysis of the proportion of employees in the different economic sectors in the course of time the structural change becomes more obvious. A shifting has taken place: both cities engage currently more people in the tertiary sector and less people in the secondary sector as twenty years ago. Concluding all indicators it can be said that a deindustrialisation took place. However, also other influences on shrinking, as for example migration, are described and their impact on both cities is explained. With investigating the consolidation areas of the programme Stadtumbau Ost and Stadtumbau West in Halle and Gelsenkirchen the possible course of action by the policy is presented and those areas in Halle and Gelsenkirchen are identified, which have the biggest population decline and the highest vacancy rates. Critique about the Stadtumbau programme is given at the end of the research. The result of the analysis is that deindustrialisation can explain big parts of the shrinking process in both cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory
    To Our Dead: Local Expellee Monuments and the Contestation of German Postwar Memory by Jeffrey P. Luppes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Germanic Languages and Literatures) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Andrei S. Markovits, Chair Professor Geoff Eley Associate Professor Julia C. Hell Associate Professor Johannes von Moltke © Jeffrey P. Luppes 2010 To My Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a dissertation is a long, arduous, and often lonely exercise. Fortunately, I have had unbelievable support from many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor and dissertation committee chair, Andrei S. Markovits. Andy has played the largest role in my development as a scholar. In fact, his seminal works on German politics, German history, collective memory, anti-Americanism, and sports influenced me intellectually even before I arrived in Ann Arbor. The opportunity to learn from and work with him was the main reason I wanted to attend the University of Michigan. The decision to come here has paid off immeasurably. Andy has always pushed me to do my best and has been a huge inspiration—both professionally and personally—from the start. His motivational skills and dedication to his students are unmatched. Twice, he gave me the opportunity to assist in the teaching of his very popular undergraduate course on sports and society. He was also always quick to provide recommendation letters and signatures for my many fellowship applications. Most importantly, Andy helped me rethink, re-work, and revise this dissertation at a crucial point.
    [Show full text]