<<

for Acute After Propofol Administration James Sherer, BA, Tomas Salazar, BE, Kevin B. Schesing, BA, Shannon McPartland, BS, Jeffrey Kornitzer, MD

Extrapyramidal symptoms are an uncommon but well-recognized side abstract effect after the administration of general anesthesia in patients without a significant neurologic history. Several case reports implicate propofol as the likely causative agent producing these symptoms, which include ballismus, , choreoathetosis, and . Currently, there is no clear consensus on first-line treatment of these symptoms. In each of the published cases, and Department of , Rutgers New Jersey Medical were central to initial management, although the speed and extent of School, Newark, New Jersey symptom resolution were variable. Here we present a case of a 17-year- Mr Sherer performed the literature review, drafted old boy with ulcerative colitis who presented with ballismus, torticollis, the original case report, edited the fi nalized case tongue thrusting, and oculogyric movements after colonoscopy under report, and coordinated with co-authors; Mr Salazar reviewed the details of the case and aided general anesthesia with propofol. The patient responded promptly to in drafting the original case report; Mr Schesing treatment with diphenhydramine. This is the first reported case in which reviewed the literature and aided in drafting the diphenhydramine was successfully used as the primary treatment of original case report; Ms McPartland reviewed the severe extrapyramidal symptoms in a pediatric patient after propofol literature, aided in drafting the original case report, and edited the fi nalized case report; Dr Kornitzer administration. diagnosed and treated the patient discussed in the case report, conceptualized the original case report, and edited and critically reviewed the case report; and all authors approved the fi nal An intravenous anesthetic agent been effective in only a minority of manuscript as submitted. cases.4 Our case demonstrates how a commonly used in the pediatric DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1135 population, propofol is approved by regimen of diphenhydramine followed Accepted for publication Oct 10, 2016 the US Food and Drug Administration by benztropine may be an effective for anesthesia maintenance in patients treatment for relief of extrapyramidal Address correspondence to Jeffrey Kornitzer, MD, Department of Neurology, Rutgers New Jersey symptoms caused by propofol. >2 months old and for anesthesia Medical School, Suite 5300, 90 Bergen Street, induction in patients >3 years old. 1 Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail: [email protected] With wide clinical use, propofol PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, is considered invaluable by many CASE 1098-4275). physicians, given its overall safety A 17-year-old boy with ulcerative Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of 2 and efficacy in patients of all ages. colitis presented with severe Pediatrics However, propofol may cause a extrapyramidal symptoms after FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have number of well-recognized adverse a colonoscopy under general indicated they have no fi nancial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. reactions, including hypotension, anesthesia. At home, the patient took injection site burning, apnea, and mercaptopurine 75 mg and 100 mg FUNDING: No external funding. central nervous system (CNS) effects. 3 on alternating days, mesalamine POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors The CNS effects of propofol are varied 2.4 mg daily, omeprazole 20 mg twice have indicated they have no potential confl icts of interest to disclose. and well documented, ranging from daily, and a multivitamin daily. The prolonged unresponsiveness to patient had never experienced an abnormal movements. 3 Treatment of adverse reaction to any , To cite: Sherer J, Salazar T, Schesing KB, et al. the CNS side effects of propofol has and there was no family history of Diphenhydramine for Acute Extrapyramidal traditionally consisted of a cocktail anesthesia problems. The procedure Symptoms After Propofol Administration. Pediatrics. 2017;139(2):e20161135 of benzodiazepines, although it has was performed with propofol 200 mg,

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 26, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 139 , number 2 , February 2017 :e 20161135 CASE REPORT lidocaine 60 mg, and sevoflurane not recur, the patient was maintained literature review describes the use 2%. To reduce the risk of aspiration on intravenous diphenhydramine of benzodiazepines as treatment during the procedure, given for the next 2 days, with the dosage in 7 reported cases. 4 In 5 of these vomiting and gastroesophageal tapered from 25 mg every 6 hours cases, there was no response to reflux in the days leading up to the the first day to 12.5 mg every 6 hours treatment, and the remaining 2 cases colonoscopy, the anesthesiologist the second day. He had no more displayed only partial remission of used rapid induction with abnormal movements. symptoms. The only documented succinylcholine 100 mg, followed patient to achieve complete by uncomplicated intubation. remission of extrapyramidal The patient did not receive DISCUSSION symptoms was treated with ondansetron, , or , an anticholinergic In addition to propofol, many any other antiemetic medication, agent. 4 Interestingly, none of the anesthetics, including sevoflurane, because he did not complain of published cases report treatment thiopentone, and etomidate, have nausea or vomiting the morning with diphenhydramine, despite been associated with extrapyramidal of the colonoscopy. The procedure the fact that diphenhydramine movements. Propofol is of particular lasted for 1 hour. Shortly after is often used as prophylaxis for interest because of its widespread regaining consciousness, the patient extrapyramidal symptoms caused use for anesthesia induction and experienced violent, uncontrolled by other medications, such as maintenance in the pediatric bilateral ballismus involving all 4 metoclopramide. 15 population. Although there are a extremities. Additionally, he had number of reports of abnormal Our treatment regimen builds on torticollis, intermittent tongue movements associated with the successful treatment with an thrusting, and sporadic oculogyric propofol, 5 – 11 no clear treatment has anticholinergic described in the crises. Despite the movements, he been developed. Reported reactions literature but uses diphenhydramine remained awake and communicative to propofol include opisthotonus, rather than biperiden for its throughout these events, stating that a state of spine and extremity anticholinergic properties. he was unable to control his arms, hyperextension. 5 Dystonic reactions, Previously, diphenhydramine has legs, neck, and eyes. During this time such as intermittent or sustained been used to aid in the treatment the patient’s cardiopulmonary status contractions of muscles in the face, of movement disorders in the remained stable, he had no tongue larynx, trunk, pelvis, and extremities, pediatric population, 16 – 18 but it biting, and he did not exhibit bladder have also been detailed in the has not specifically been used to or bowel incontinence. literature. 6– 8 Our patient experienced treat extrapyramidal symptoms (with prolonged associated with propofol use. Midazolam 2 mg was administered upward deviation of the eyes), a rare In this case, prompt and nearly intravenously without relief of side effect previously reported in complete resolution of severe symptoms, and the patient was association with propofol. 12 Although symptoms was achieved with 50 mg transferred to the postanesthesia the neuroexcitatory mechanisms of diphenhydramine alone, although full care unit. Because of continuing propofol are not well understood, 13 resolution required the addition of symptoms, he received 1 mg it is hypothesized that the potential 2 mg benztropine soon after. Benefits intravenous lorazepam and an extrapyramidal effects of propofol of using diphenhydramine in this way additional 2 mg midazolam. When result from activation of excitatory include its widespread availability the patient did not respond to these pathways in the subcortical region, and limited side effects at low medications, the neurology team was 19 extended refractory periods in dosages. Although more research consulted. After determining him to inhibitory pathways in the brainstem is clearly indicated, we suggest that be having an extrapyramidal reaction and spinal cord, or a combination of giving diphenhydramine, followed by to propofol, the neurology team both. 14 benztropine for lingering movements, gave the patient diphenhydramine and then a diphenhydramine taper 50 mg intravenously. Within several Recent therapeutic attempts aimed is an effective and safe approach to minutes, there was near complete at alleviating extrapyramidal treating extrapyramidal symptoms cessation of all extrapyramidal symptoms associated with propofol associated with propofol use. movements. Some lingering, have included intermittent, athetoid movements and benzodiazepines, but these were completely halted by 2 mg interventions have led to suboptimal benztropine administered 30 minutes outcomes. 4 In the literature to ABBREVIATION after diphenhydramine was given. To date, there is no clear consensus on CNS: central nervous system ensure that these symptoms would treatment of these symptoms. One

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 26, 2021 e2 SHERER et al REFERENCES anaesthesia--with focus on propofol 14. Campbell GA, Morgan DJ, Kumar anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. K, Crankshaw DP. Extended blood 1. Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D’Mello 2000;44(2):144–149 collection period required to defi ne A. Propofol: a review of its role in distribution and elimination kinetics pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS 7. Diltoer MW, Rosseneu S, Ramet J, of propofol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. Drugs. 2015;29(7):543–563 et al. Anticholinergic treatment for choreoathetosis in a child after 1988;26(2):187–190 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists induction with propofol. Anesth Analg. Task Force on Sedation and 15. Friedman BW, Bender B, Davitt 1996;82(3):670 Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. M, et al. A randomized trial of Practice guidelines for sedation and 8. Chan A, Nickoll E, Thornton C, diphenhydramine as prophylaxis analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Doré C, Newton DEF. Spontaneous against metoclopramide-induced Anesthesiology. 2002;96(4):1004–1017 movement after injection of propofol. in nauseated emergency Anaesthesia. 1996;51(7):663–666 department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 3. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, 2009;53(3):379–385 Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH; Pediatric 9. Schramm BM, Orser BA. Dystonic Sedation Research Consortium. The reaction to propofol attenuated by 16. Sawicka KM, Goez H, Huntsman RJ. incidence and nature of adverse benztropine (cogentin). Anesth Analg. Successful treatment of paroxysmal events during pediatric sedation/ 2002;94(5):1237–1240 movement disorders of infancy with and diphenhydramine. anesthesia with propofol for 10. M äkelä JP, Iivanainen M, Pediatr Neurol. 2016;56:72–75 procedures outside the operating Pieninkeroinen IP, Waltimo O, room: a report from the Pediatric Lahdensuu M. Seizures associated 17. Gra ñana N, Ferrea M, Scorticati Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth with propofol anesthesia. Epilepsia. MC, et al. Benefi cial effects of Analg. 2009;108(3):795–804 1993;34(5):832–835 diphenhydramine in dystonia. Medicina 4. Saravanakumar K, Venkatesh P, 11. Anderson BJ, Marks PV, Futter ME. (B Aires). 1999;59(1):38–42 Bromley P. Delayed onset refractory Propofol--contrasting effects in 18. Truong DD, Sandroni P, van den Noort dystonic movements following movement disorders. Br J Neurosurg. S, Matsumoto RR. Diphenhydramine propofol anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 1994;8(3):387–388 is effective in the treatment of 2005;15(7):597–601 12. Dingwall AE. Oculogyric crisis after idiopathic dystonia. Arch Neurol. 5. Ries CR, Scoates PJ, Puil E. day case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1995;52(4):405–407 Opisthotonos following propofol: 1987;42(5):565 19. Tu RH, Grewall P, Leung JW, et al. a nonepileptic perspective and 13. Borgeat A, Dessibourg C, Popovic V, Diphenhydramine as an adjunct treatment strategy. Can J Anaesth. Meier D, Blanchard M, Schwander D. to sedation for colonoscopy: a 1994;41(5 pt 1):414–419 Propofol and spontaneous movements: double-blind randomized, placebo- 6. Islander G, Vinge E. Severe an EEG study. Anesthesiology. controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. neuroexcitatory symptoms after 1991;74(1):24–27 2006;63(1):87–94

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 26, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 139 , number 2 , February 2017 e3 Diphenhydramine for Acute Extrapyramidal Symptoms After Propofol Administration James Sherer, Tomas Salazar, Kevin B. Schesing, Shannon McPartland and Jeffrey Kornitzer Pediatrics 2017;139; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1135 originally published online January 5, 2017;

Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at: Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/139/2/e20161135 References This article cites 19 articles, 0 of which you can access for free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/139/2/e20161135#BIBL Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Neurology http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/neurology_sub Neurologic Disorders http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/neurologic_disorders_ sub Anesthesiology/Pain Medicine http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/anesthesiology:pain_m edicine_sub Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 26, 2021 Diphenhydramine for Acute Extrapyramidal Symptoms After Propofol Administration James Sherer, Tomas Salazar, Kevin B. Schesing, Shannon McPartland and Jeffrey Kornitzer Pediatrics 2017;139; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1135 originally published online January 5, 2017;

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/139/2/e20161135

Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca, Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 26, 2021