Diversity and Roles of Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bee Orchid Ophrys Apifera

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diversity and Roles of Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bee Orchid Ophrys Apifera Diversity and Roles of Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bee Orchid Ophrys apifera By Wazeera Rashid Abdullah April 2018 A Thesis submitted to the University of Liverpool in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy Table of Contents Page No. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. xiv Abbreviations ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Chapter one: Literature review: ........................................................................................ 3 1.1 Mycorrhiza: .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) or Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM): ........... 5 1.1.2 Ectomycorrhiza: ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Ectendomycorrhiza: ................................................................................................ 6 1.1.4 Ericoid mycorrhiza, Arbutoid mycorrhiza, and Monotropoid mycorrhiza: ............ 6 1.1.5 Orchid mycorrhiza: ................................................................................................. 7 1.1.5.1 Orchid mycorrhizal interaction: ....................................................................... 8 1.2 Rhizoctonia systematics: ................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1 Rhizoctonia as a pathogen: ...................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 Rhizoctonia as a mycorrhizal symbiont: ................................................................. 9 1.3 Isolation of orchid symbiont fungi: .............................................................................. 10 1.4 Molecular Identification of fungi: ................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Barcoding sequences for fungi: ............................................................................. 11 1.4.2 Molecular methods in Rhizoctonia classification: ................................................ 12 1.5 Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technologies: .................................................... 13 1.5.1 Illumina sequencing: ............................................................................................. 14 1.5.2 NGS application: ................................................................................................... 15 1.5.3 Transcriptomes in non-model plants: .................................................................... 15 1.6 Family Orchidaceae: ................................................................................................... 16 1.6.1Terrestrial orchids: ................................................................................................. 16 1.7 Aims of this thesis: ....................................................................................................... 19 2 Chapter two: Life history of Ophrys apifera. .................................................................. 21 2.1 Introduction: - ............................................................................................................ 21 2.1.1 Life history of orchid plant: .................................................................................. 21 2.1.2 Genus Ophrys: ...................................................................................................... 25 2.1.2.1 Ophrys apifera: .............................................................................................. 25 2.2 Materials and Method: .............................................................................................. 27 2.2.1 Study area - Biosciences plants: ............................................................................ 27 2.2.2 Data recording ....................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Environmental data: .............................................................................................. 28 2.3 Results: ........................................................................................................................ 29 2.3.1 Bee orchid growth cycle: ...................................................................................... 29 2.3.1.1 Vegetative development: ................................................................................ 29 2.3.1.2: Flower shoots development: ......................................................................... 31 i 2.3.1.3: Relationship between vegetative and reproductive development: ................ 33 2.4 Discussion: .................................................................................................................. 36 3 Chapter three: Seed germination of Ophrys apifera in vitro. ........................................ 38 3.1 Introduction: .............................................................................................................. 38 3.1.1 Orchid seeds: ......................................................................................................... 38 3.1.1.1 Orchid seeds structure: ................................................................................... 38 3.1.1.2 Interaction between orchid seeds and fungi during germination: .................. 38 3.1.2 Laboratory culture of orchid seeds:....................................................................... 39 3.1.2.1 Decontamination of capsules and seeds: ........................................................ 40 3.1.2.2 Culture medium: ............................................................................................ 41 3.1.2.3 Growth regulators: ......................................................................................... 42 3.1.4 Culture of seedlings asymbiotically: ..................................................................... 43 3.1.5 Other factors that affect seed germination in vitro:............................................... 43 3.1.5.1 Effects of temperature on the seed germination: ............................................ 43 3.1.5.2 Effects of light on seed germination: ............................................................. 44 3.1.5.3 Effect of seed maturity on germination in vitro: ............................................ 44 3.1.6 Germinating genus Ophrys in vitro: ...................................................................... 45 3.2 Materials and Method: .............................................................................................. 46 3.2.1 Collection of orchid capsules: ............................................................................... 46 3.2.2 Equipment: ............................................................................................................ 46 3.2.3 Culture medium composition: ............................................................................... 46 3.2.4 Seed isolation: ....................................................................................................... 46 3.2.5 Culture Condition:................................................................................................. 46 3.2.6 Inoculation of fungi into seed germination cultures: ............................................ 48 3.3 Results: ........................................................................................................................ 49 3.3.1 Developmental stages of seed germination in vitro: ............................................. 49 3.3.2 Effects of media on in vitro seed germination and protocorm formation: ............ 49 3.4 Discussion: .................................................................................................................. 52 3.4.1 In vitro cultivation:................................................................................................ 52 3.4.2 Factors that impact on germination: ...................................................................... 52 4 Chapter four: Isolation and identification of orchid mycorrhizal fungi: .................... 53 4.1 Introduction: - ............................................................................................................ 53 4.1.1 Overview: .............................................................................................................. 53 4.1.2 Isolation of fungi from orchid roots: ..................................................................... 53 4.1.3 Identification fungi from orchid roots: .................................................................. 54 4.1.4 Methods for isolation and estimation of fungi in soil: .......................................... 55 4.1.5 Growth of fungi in culture: ................................................................................... 55 4.1.5.1 Effect of different culture media and temperature ......................................... 55 4.1.6 Isolation of DNA of fungi from soil: .................................................................... 56 ii 4.1.7 Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS):........................................................................ 57 4.1.7.1 ITS primers and limitation: ...........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of the Orchids of the Crimea (Orchidaceae)
    J. Eur. Orch. 46 (2): 407 - 436. 2014. Alexander V. Fateryga and Karel C.A.J. Kreutz Checklist of the orchids of the Crimea (Orchidaceae) Keywords Orchidaceae, checklist of species, new nomenclature combinations, hybrids, flora of the Crimea. Summary Fateryga, A.V. & C.A.J. Kreutz (2014): Checklist of the orchids of the Crimea (Orchidaceae).- J. Eur. Orch. 46 (2): 407-436. A new nomenclature checklist of the Crimean orchids with 49 taxa and 16 hybrids is proposed. Six new taxa are added and ten taxa are excluded from the latest checklist of the Crimean vascular flora published by YENA (2012). In addition, five nomenclature changes are proposed: Epipactis persica (Soó) Nannf. subsp. taurica (Fateryga & Kreutz) Fateryga & Kreutz comb. et stat. nov., Orchis mascula (L.) L. var. wanjkovii (E. Wulff) Fateryga & Kreutz stat. nov., Anacamptis ×simorrensis (E.G. Camus) H. Kretzschmar, Eccarius & H. Dietr. nothosubsp. ticinensis (Gsell) Fateryga & Kreutz stat. nov., ×Dactylocamptis uechtritziana (Hausskn.) B. Bock ex M. Peregrym & Kuzemko nothosubsp. magyarii (Soó) Fateryga & Kreutz comb. et stat. nov., and Orchis ×beyrichii Kern. nothosubsp. mackaensis (Kreutz) Fateryga & Kreutz comb. et stat. nov. Moreover, a new variety, Limodorum abortivum (L.) Sw. var. viridis Fateryga & Kreutz var. nov. is described. Zusammenfassung Fateryga, A.V. & C.A.J. Kreutz (2014): Eine Übersicht der Orchideen der Krim (Orchidaceae).- J. Eur. Orch. 46 (2): 407-436. Eine neue nomenklatorische Liste der Orchideen der Krim mit 49 Taxa und 16 Hybriden wird vorgestellt. Sechs Arten sind neu für die Krim. Zehn Taxa, die noch bei YENA (2012) in seiner Checklist aufgelistet wurden, kommen auf der Krim nicht vor und wurden gestrichen.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Clitopilus Byssisedoides</I>
    MYCOTAXON Volume 112, pp. 225–229 April–June 2010 Clitopilus byssisedoides, a new species from a hothouse in Germany Machiel Noordeloos1, Delia Co-David1 & Andreas Gminder2 [email protected] Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section NHN) P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 2Dorfstrasse 27, D-07751 Jena, Germany Abstract — Clitopilus byssisedoides is described as a new species found in a hothouse in Botanischer Garten Jena, in Jena, Germany, of unknown, possibly tropical origin. In this study, it is described, illustrated and distinguished from other pleurotoid Clitopilus species with rhodocyboid spores, particularly from other members of (Rhodocybe) sect. Claudopodes Key words — Entolomataceae, phylogeny, taxonomy Introduction Gminder (2005) described a remarkable pleurotoid species with rhodocyboid spores from a hothouse in the botanical garden in Jena, Germany. It was provisionally called “Rhodocybe byssisedoides” because of its resemblance to Entoloma byssisedum (Pers.) Donk. In a recent molecular phylogenetic study of the Entolomataceae (where this new species was included as “Rhodocybe sp.”), it has been shown that Clitopilus is nested within Rhodocybe. As a result, both genera were merged into Clitopilus sensu lato (Co-David et al. 2009). In this study, we formally describe the new species, Clitopilus byssisedoides and compare it to the other pleurotoid taxa. Material and methods The morphology was studied on dried material with standard methods, using sections mounted in either ammonia 5% or Congo red and a Leica DM1000 microscope. Microscopic structures were drawn with help of a drawing tube. 226 ... Noordeloos, Co-David & Gminder Taxonomic description Clitopilus byssisedoides Gminder, Noordel. & Co-David, sp. nov. MycoBank # 515443 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf of JHOS January 2012
    JJoouurrnnaall of the HHAARRDDYY OORRCCHHIIDD SSOOCCIIEETTYY Vol. 9 No. 1 (63) January 2012 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 9 No. 1 (63) January 2012 The Hardy Orchid Society Our aim is to promote interest in the study of Native European Orchids and those from similar temperate climates throughout the world. We cover such varied aspects as field study, cultivation and propagation, photography, taxonomy and systematics, and practical conservation. We welcome articles relating to any of these subjects, which will be considered for publication by the editorial committee. Please send your submissions to the Editor, and please structure your text according to the “Advice to Authors” (see website www.hardyorchidsociety.org.uk , January 2004 Journal, Members’ Handbook or contact the Editor). Views expressed in journal arti - cles are those of their author(s) and may not reflect those of HOS. The Hardy Orchid Society Committee President: Prof. Richard Bateman, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS Chairman: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Vice-Chairman: David Hughes, Linmoor Cottage, Highwood, Ringwood, Hants., BH24 3LE [email protected] Secretary: Alan Leck, 61 Fraser Close, Deeping St. James, Peterborough, PE6 8QL [email protected] Treasurer: John Wallington, 17, Springbank, Eversley Park Road, London, N21 1JH [email protected] Membership Secretary: Moira Tarrant, Bumbys, Fox Road, Mashbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Bodenmikrobiologie (Version: 07/2019)
    Langzeitmonitoring von Ökosystemprozessen - Methoden-Handbuch Modul 04: Bodenmikrobiologie (Version: 07/2019) www.hohetauern.at Impressum Impressum Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: Dr. Fernando Fernández Mendoza & Prof. Mag Dr. Martin Grube Institut für Biologie, Bereich Pflanzenwissenschaften, Universität Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz Nationalparkrat Hohe Tauern, Kirchplatz 2, 9971 Matrei i.O. Titelbild: Ein Transekt im Untersuchungsgebiet Innergschlöss (2350 m üNN) wird im Jahr 2017 beprobt. © Newesely Zitiervorschlag: Fernández Mendoza F, Grube M (2019) Langzeitmonitoring von Ökosystemprozessen im Nationalpark Hohe Tauern. Modul 04: Mikrobiologie. Methoden-Handbuch. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien. ISBN-Online: 978-3-7001-8752-3, doi: 10.1553/GCP_LZM_NPHT_Modul04 Weblink: https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at und http://www.parcs.at/npht/mmd_fullentry.php?docu_id=38612 Inhaltsverzeichnis Zielsetzung ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Inhalt Vorbereitungsarbeit und benötigtes Material ................................................................................................... 2 a. Materialien für die Probenahme und Probenaufbewahrung ................................................................ 2 b. Materialien und Geräte für die Laboranalyse ...................................................................................... 2 Arbeitsablauf ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Reproduction in the Order Cystofilobasidiales
    Alexandra Sofia Rodrigues Cabrita Licenciada em Biologia Celular e Molecular Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Reproduction in the Order Cystofilobasidiales Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Genética Molecular e Biomedicina Orientadora: Professora Doutora Paula Gonçalves, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Co-orientador: Doutor Marco Coelho, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Júri: Presidente: Professora Doutora Margarida Casal Ribeiro Castro Caldas Braga Arguente: Doutora Maria Teresa Proença Mendes Maia Vogal: Professora Doutora Paula Maria Theriaga Mendes Bernardo Gonçalves Novembro, 2018 Alexandra Sofia Rodrigues Cabrita Licenciada em Biologia Celular e Molecular Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Reproduction in the Order Cystofilobasidiales Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Genética Molecular e Biomedicina Orientadora: Professora Doutora Paula Gonçalves, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Co-orientador: Doutor Marco Coelho, Universidade Nova de Lisboa Júri: Presidente: Professora Doutora Margarida Casal Ribeiro Castro Caldas Braga Arguente: Doutora Maria Teresa Proença Mendes Maia Vogal: Professora Doutora Paula Maria Theriaga Mendes Bernardo Gonçalves Novembro, 2018 Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Reproduction in the Order Cystofilobasidiales Copyright Alexandra Sofia Rodrigues Cabrita, FCT/UNL, UNL A Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia e a Universidade Nova de Lisboa têm o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicar esta dissertação através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por qualquer outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, e de a divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distribuição com objectivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor. ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Paula Gonçalves, for having hosted me in the Yeast Genomics lab and for all the help and support throughout this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Selected Species Subject to Long- Standing Import Suspensions
    UNEP-WCMC technical report Review of selected species subject to long- standing import suspensions Part II: Asia and Oceania (Version edited for public release) Review of selected species subject to long-standing import suspensions. Part II: Asia and Oceania Prepared for The European Commission, Directorate General Environment, Directorate E - Global & Regional Challenges, LIFE ENV.E.2. – Global Sustainability, Trade & Multilateral Agreements, Brussels, Belgium Prepared February 2016 Copyright European Commission 2016 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2016. Review of selected species subject to long-standing import suspensions. Part II: Asia and Oceania. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with policy advice and the development of decision tools. We are able to provide objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision- makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. To do this, we collate and verify data on biodiversity and ecosystem services that we analyze and interpret in comprehensive assessments, making the results available in appropriate forms for national and international level decision-makers and businesses. To ensure that our work is both sustainable and equitable we seek to build the capacity of partners
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Crittendenia Gen. Nov., a New Lichenicolous Lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a Review of the Biology
    The Lichenologist (2021), 53, 103–116 doi:10.1017/S002428292000033X Standard Paper Crittendenia gen. nov., a new lichenicolous lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a review of the biology, phylogeny and classification of lichenicolous heterobasidiomycetes Ana M. Millanes1, Paul Diederich2, Martin Westberg3 and Mats Wedin4 1Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, E-28933 Móstoles, Spain; 2Musée national d’histoire naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg; 3Museum of Evolution, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden and 4Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The lichenicolous ‘heterobasidiomycetes’ belong in the Tremellomycetes (Agaricomycotina) and in the Pucciniomycotina. In this paper, we provide an introduction and review of these lichenicolous taxa, focusing on recent studies and novelties of their classification, phylogeny and evolution. Lichen-inhabiting fungi in the Pucciniomycotina are represented by only a small number of species included in the genera Chionosphaera, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma. The phylogenetic position of the lichenicolous representatives of Chionosphaera has, however, never been investigated by molecular methods. Phylogenetic analyses using the nuclear SSU, ITS, and LSU ribosomal DNA mar- kers reveal that the lichenicolous members of Chionosphaera form a monophyletic group in the Pucciniomycotina, distinct from Chionosphaera and outside the Chionosphaeraceae. The new genus Crittendenia is described to accommodate these lichen-inhabiting spe- cies. Crittendenia is characterized by minute synnemata-like basidiomata, the presence of clamp connections and aseptate tubular basidia from which 4–7 spores discharge passively, often in groups. Crittendenia, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma are the only lichenicolous lineages known so far in the Pucciniomycotina, whereas Chionosphaera does not include any lichenicolous taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Udeniomyces Kanasensis Sp. Nov., a Ballistoconidium-Forming Yeast Species in the Cystofilobasidiales
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2012) 102:45–51 DOI 10.1007/s10482-012-9711-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Udeniomyces kanasensis sp. nov., a ballistoconidium-forming yeast species in the Cystofilobasidiales Pei-Jie Han • Jun-Zhi Qiu • Qi-Ming Wang • Feng-Yan Bai Received: 10 November 2011 / Accepted: 4 February 2012 / Published online: 22 February 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract In a survey of ballistoconidium-forming Abbreviation yeast diversity in the phyllosphere, five strains from ITS Internal transcribed spacer wilting plant leaves collected from Kanas Nature Reserve in Xinjiang province, China were selected based on morphological comparison. These strains Introduction formed pinkish-white colonies and large bilaterally symmetrical ballistoconidia. Molecular phylogenetic The genus Udeniomyces was proposed for threes analyses based on the 26S rRNA D1/D2 domain and species, Udeniomyces megalosporus, Udeniomyces pu- ITS region sequences showed that these strains niceus and Udeniomyces pyricola (Nakase and Tak- belonged to the Udeniomyces clade in the Cystofi- ematsu 1992), which were classified previously in the lobasidiales. They differ from the described Udeni- ‘pyricola group’ of the genus Bullera (Nakase 1987)and omyces species significantly in the rRNA sequences as characterized by forming large bilaterally symmetrical well as physiological criteria. Therefore, a new species ballistoconidia and pinkish-white to pale pink colonies Udeniomyces kanasensis sp. nov. (type strain XJ (Nakase 1989). Niwata et al. (2002)describedUdeni- 6E2T=CGMCC 2.02627 T=CBS 12488 T) is proposed omyces pannonicus on the basis of its morphological to accommodate these strains. The MycoBank number and chemotaxonomic characteristics. However, this of the new species is MB 563659.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Phytogeography of Northeast Asia
    Chapter 4 Phytogeography of Northeast Asia Hong QIAN 1, Pavel KRESTOV 2, Pei-Yun FU 3, Qing-Li WANG 3, Jong-Suk SONG 4 and Christine CHOURMOUZIS 5 1 Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, USA, e-mail: [email protected]; 2 Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia, e-mail: [email protected]; 3 Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 417, Shenyang 110015, China; 4 Department of Biological Science, College of Natural Sciences, Andong National University, Andong 760-749, Korea, e-mail: [email protected]; 5 Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, 3041-2424 mail Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Northeast Asia as defined in this study includes the Russian Far East, Northeast China, the northern part of the Korean Peninsula, and Hokkaido Island (Japan). We determined the species richness of Northeast Asia at various spatial scales, analyzed the floristic relationships among geographic regions within Northeast Asia, and compared the flora of Northeast Asia with surrounding floras. The flora of Northeast Asia consists of 971 genera and 4953 species of native vascular plants. Based on their worldwide distributions, the 971 gen- era were grouped into fourteen phytogeographic elements. Over 900 species of vascular plants are endemic to Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia shares 39% of its species with eastern Siberia-Mongolia, 24% with Europe, 16.2% with western North America, and 12.4% with eastern North America.
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Translation Initiation Codons for the Plastid Maturase Matk: Unraveling the Pseudogene Misconception in the Orchidaceae Michelle M
    Barthet et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:210 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0491-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Alternative translation initiation codons for the plastid maturase MatK: unraveling the pseudogene misconception in the Orchidaceae Michelle M. Barthet1,2* , Keenan Moukarzel3, Kayla N. Smith1, Jaimin Patel3 and Khidir W. Hilu3 Abstract Background: The plastid maturase MatK has been implicated as a possible model for the evolutionary “missing link” between prokaryotic and eukaryotic splicing machinery. This evolutionary implication has sparked investigations concerning the function of this unusual maturase. Intron targets of MatK activity suggest that this is an essential enzyme for plastid function. The matK gene, however, is described as a pseudogene in many photosynthetic orchid species due to presence of premature stop codons in translations, and its high rate of nucleotide and amino acid substitution. Results: Sequence analysis of the matK gene from orchids identified an out-of-frame alternative AUG initiation codon upstream from the consensus initiation codon used for translation in other angiosperms. We demonstrate translation from the alternative initiation codon generates a conserved MatK reading frame. We confirm that MatK protein is expressed and functions in sample orchids currently described as having a matK pseudogene using immunodetection and reverse-transcription methods. We demonstrate using phylogenetic analysis that this alternative initiation codon emerged de novo within the Orchidaceae, with several reversal events at the basal lineage and deep in orchid history. Conclusion: These findings suggest a novel evolutionary shift for expression of matK in the Orchidaceae and support the function of MatK as a group II intron maturase in the plastid genome of land plants including the orchids.
    [Show full text]