DOCSLIB.ORG

Visualizing Geometry with Pictures, Symbols and Words

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Visualizing geometry with pictures, symbols and words Jemma Lorenat | Université Pierre et Marie Curie Simon Fraser University! !!! [email protected] [email protected] ! “Just as the entire mode of existence of human collectives changes over long historical periods, so too does their mode of perception.” ! Walter Benjamin, Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936) “In a word, to translate into Algebra the questions of Geometry, and reciprocally, to translate into Geometry the results obtained by Algebra, that is the goal that we propose in the APPLICATION OF ALGEBRA TO GEOMETRY.” Pierre Louis Marie Bourdon, Application de l’algèbre à la géométrie (1825) Geometry in books Geometry in research Visualizing geometry with Poncelet’s figures pictures, symbols and words: Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Representation and perception of geometry in Another form of purity France and Germany during the first third of the Conclusions nineteenth century Geometry in books Geometry in research Visualizing geometry with Poncelet’s figures pictures, symbols and words: Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Representation and perception of geometry in Another form of purity France and Germany during the first third of the Conclusions nineteenth century Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions French publications, illustrations, definitions of geometry, textbooks Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Sylvestre François Lacroix, Application de l’algèbre à la géométrie (1807) Geometry in books “GEOMETRY takes its name from the principal Geometry in research usage for which it seems that this science was originally employed, that is, land measurement, Poncelet’s figures because this word signifies the art of land measuring. Poncelet’s view But then we have applied it to anything which Pure analytic geometry concerns bodily extension: so geometry has become Another form of purity the science of extension.” Conclusions G. F. Olivier, Géométrie usuelle (1835) Geometry in books “GEOMETRY takes its name from the principal Geometry in research usage for which it seems that this science was originally employed, that is, land measurement, Poncelet’s figures because this word signifies the art of land measuring. Poncelet’s view But then we have applied it to anything which Pure analytic geometry concerns bodily extension: so geometry has become Another form of purity the science of extension.” Conclusions G. F. Olivier, Géométrie usuelle (1835) “In each science there are things which cannot be Geometry in books taught, and that the student must acquire by himself; Geometry in research this is the habit of the procedures of science, or Poncelet’s figures otherwise the mechanism of the operations it Poncelet’s view prescribes: in arithmetic and in algebra these are Pure analytic geometry calculations, in geometry, constructions.” Another form of purity Sylvestre François Lacroix, Essai sur l’enseignement en général Conclusions et sur celui des mathématiques en particulier (1805) “In each science there are things which cannot be Geometry in books taught, and that the student must acquire by himself; Geometry in research this is the habit of the procedures of science, or Poncelet’s figures otherwise the mechanism of the operations it Poncelet’s view prescribes: in arithmetic and in algebra these are Pure analytic geometry calculations, in geometry, constructions.” Another form of purity Sylvestre François Lacroix, Essai sur l’enseignement en général Conclusions et sur celui des mathématiques en particulier (1805) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Jean-Victor Poncelet, Traité des propriétés projectives des figures (1822) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Pierre Louis Marie Bourdon, Application de l’algèbre à la géométrie (1825) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions M. H. Vernier, Géométrie élémentaire (1830) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Sylvestre François Lacroix, Élémens de géométrie (1799) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Journal articles, spiny geometry, generality of algebra Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions “Ancient geometry bristled with figures. The reason for this is simple. Because then they lacked general Geometry in books and abstract principles, each question could only be Geometry in research treated in a concrete manner, on the same figure which was the subject in question, and about which Poncelet’s figures the only view could discover the elements necessary Poncelet’s view for the proof or the solution sought.” Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Michel Chasles, Aperçu historique sur l’origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie (1837) Conclusions “Ancient geometry bristled with figures. The reason for this is simple. Because then they lacked general Geometry in books and abstract principles, each question could only be Geometry in research treated in a concrete manner, on the same figure which was the subject in question, and about which Poncelet’s figures the only view could discover the elements necessary Poncelet’s view for the proof or the solution sought.” Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Michel Chasles, Aperçu historique sur l’origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie (1837) Conclusions Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions L. M. P. Coste, Propriétés peu connues de la parabole, et construction de cette courbe au moyen de quatre conditions données (1818) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Jean Baptiste Durrande, “Théorie élémentaire des contacts des cercles, des sphères, des cylindres et des cônes” (1820) “We believe it superfluous to accompany this memoir with figures, often more overwhelming than useful in the geometry of space; figures that we Geometry in books could besides only present in a unique and Geometry in research individual aspect to the reader, who could, instead, Poncelet’s figures construct and fashion them to his taste, if he judges Poncelet’s view the assistance at all necessary. We are concerned, Pure analytic geometry indeed, only with logical deductions, always easy to Another form of purity follow when the notations are chosen in a Conclusions convenient manner.” Joseph-Diez Gergonne, “Considéraons philosophiques sur les élémens de la science de l’étendue” (1826) “We believe it superfluous to accompany this memoir with figures, often more overwhelming than useful in the geometry of space; figures that we Geometry in books could besides only present in a unique and Geometry in research individual aspect to the reader, who could, instead, Poncelet’s figures construct and fashion them to his taste, if he judges Poncelet’s view the assistance at all necessary. We are concerned, Pure analytic geometry indeed, only with logical deductions, always easy to Another form of purity follow when the notations are chosen in a Conclusions convenient manner.” Joseph-Diez Gergonne, “Considéraons philosophiques sur les élémens de la science de l’étendue” (1826) Geometry in books Geometry in research Poncelet’s figures Poncelet’s view Pure analytic geometry Another form of purity Conclusions Annales de mathématiques pures et appliquées (1820) Geometry in books “This fault of ancient Geometry was one of the relative advantages of analytic Geometry [...] One Geometry in research must ask, thus, if there was not also, in pure and Poncelet’s figures speculative Geometry, a manner of reasoning without Poncelet’s view the continual assistance of the figures, whose real Pure analytic geometry inconvenience, even when their construction is easy, is Another form of purity at least to tire the spirit and exhaust the mind.” Conclusions Michel Chasles, Aperçu historique sur l’origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie (1837) Geometry in books “This fault of ancient Geometry was one of the relative advantages of analytic Geometry [...] One Geometry in research must ask, thus, if there was not also, in pure and Poncelet’s figures speculative Geometry, a manner of reasoning without Poncelet’s view the continual assistance of the figures, whose real Pure analytic geometry inconvenience, even when their construction is easy, is Another form of purity at least to tire the spirit and exhaust the mind.” Conclusions Michel Chasles, Aperçu historique sur l’origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie (1837) “In geometry [...] the figure is described, one never Geometry in books loses it from view, one always reasons about Geometry in research magnitudes, real and existent forms, and never Poncelet’s figures reaches consequences that cannot be painted in the Poncelet’s view imagination or in sight, by sensible objects;
Recommended publications
  • A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870

    A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870

    A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870∗ Eldar Straume Department of mathematical sciences Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) N-9471 Trondheim, Norway September 4, 2014 Abstract This is an expository treatise on the development of the classical ge- ometries, starting from the origins of Euclidean geometry a few centuries BC up to around 1870. At this time classical differential geometry came to an end, and the Riemannian geometric approach started to be developed. Moreover, the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, about 40 years earlier, had just been demonstrated to be a ”true” geometry on the same footing as Euclidean geometry. These were radically new ideas, but henceforth the importance of the topic became gradually realized. As a consequence, the conventional attitude to the basic geometric questions, including the possible geometric structure of the physical space, was challenged, and foundational problems became an important issue during the following decades. Such a basic understanding of the status of geometry around 1870 enables one to study the geometric works of Sophus Lie and Felix Klein at the beginning of their career in the appropriate historical perspective. arXiv:1409.1140v1 [math.HO] 3 Sep 2014 Contents 1 Euclideangeometry,thesourceofallgeometries 3 1.1 Earlygeometryandtheroleoftherealnumbers . 4 1.1.1 Geometric algebra, constructivism, and the real numbers 7 1.1.2 Thedownfalloftheancientgeometry . 8 ∗This monograph was written up in 2008-2009, as a preparation to the further study of the early geometrical works of Sophus Lie and Felix Klein at the beginning of their career around 1870. The author apologizes for possible historiographic shortcomings, errors, and perhaps lack of updated information on certain topics from the history of mathematics.
  • An Overview of Definitions and Their Relationships

    An Overview of Definitions and Their Relationships

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY Vol. 10 (2021), No. 2, 50 - 66 A SURVEY ON CONICS IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT: an overview of definitions and their relationships. DIRK KEPPENS and NELE KEPPENS1 Abstract. Conics are undoubtedly one of the most studied objects in ge- ometry. Throughout history different definitions have been given, depending on the context in which a conic is seen. Indeed, conics can be defined in many ways: as conic sections in three-dimensional space, as loci of points in the euclidean plane, as algebraic curves of the second degree, as geometrical configurations in (desarguesian or non-desarguesian) projective planes, ::: In this paper we give an overview of all these definitions and their interre- lationships (without proofs), starting with conic sections in ancient Greece and ending with ovals in modern times. 1. Introduction There is a vast amount of literature on conic sections, the majority of which is referring to the groundbreaking work of Apollonius. Some influen- tial books were e.g. [49], [13], [51], [6], [55], [59] and [26]. This paper is an attempt to bring together the variety of existing definitions for the notion of a conic and to give a comparative overview of all known results concerning their connections, scattered in the literature. The proofs of the relationships can be found in the references and are not repeated in this article. In the first section we consider the oldest definition for a conic, due to Apollonius, as the section of a plane with a cone. Thereafter we look at conics as loci of points in the euclidean plane and as algebraic curves of the second degree going back to Descartes and some of his contemporaries.
  • Steiner's Theorems on the Complete Quadrilateral

    Steiner's Theorems on the Complete Quadrilateral

    Forum Geometricorum b Volume 4 (2004) 35–52. bbb FORUM GEOM ISSN 1534-1178 Steiner’s Theorems on the Complete Quadrilateral Jean-Pierre Ehrmann Abstract. We give a translation of Jacob Steiner’s 1828 note on the complete quadrilateral, with complete proofs and annotations in barycentric coordinates. 1. Steiner’s note on the complete quadrilateral In 1828, Jakob Steiner published in Gergonne’s Annales a very short note [9] listing ten interesting and important theorems on the complete quadrilateral. The purpose of this paper is to provide a translation of the note, to prove these theorems, along with annotations in barycentric coordinates. We begin with a translation of Steiner’s note. Suppose four lines intersect two by two at six points. (1) These four lines, taken three by three, form four triangles whose circum- circles pass through the same point F . (2) The centers of the four circles (and the point F ) lie on the same circle. (3) The perpendicular feet from F to the four lines lie on the same line R, and F is the only point with this property. (4) The orthocenters of the four triangles lie on the same line R. (5) The lines R and R are parallel, and the line R passes through the midpoint of the segment joining F to its perpendicular foot on R. (6) The midpoints of the diagonals of the complete quadrilateral formed by the four given lines lie on the same line R (Newton). (7) The line R is a common perpendicular to the lines R and R. (8) Each of the four triangles in (1) has an incircle and three excircles.
  • The Rise of Projective Geometry II

    The Rise of Projective Geometry II

    The Rise of Projective Geometry II The Renaissance Artists Although isolated results from earlier periods are now considered as belonging to the subject of projective geometry, the fundamental ideas that form the core of this area stem from the work of artists during the Renaissance. Earlier art appears to us as being very stylized and flat. The Renaissance Artists Towards the end of the 13th century, early Renaissance artists began to attempt to portray situations in a more realistic way. One early technique is known as terraced perspective, where people in a group scene that are further in the back are drawn higher up than those in the front. Simone Martini: Majesty The Renaissance Artists As artists attempted to find better techniques to improve the realism of their work, the idea of vertical perspective was developed by the Italian school of artists (for example Duccio (1255-1318) and Giotto (1266-1337)). To create the sense of depth, parallel lines in the scene are represented by lines that meet in the centerline of the picture. Duccio's Last Supper The Renaissance Artists The modern system of focused perspective was discovered around 1425 by the sculptor and architect Brunelleschi (1377-1446), and formulated in a treatise a few years later by the painter and architect Leone Battista Alberti (1404-1472). The method was perfected by Leonardo da Vinci (1452 – 1519). The German artist Albrecht Dürer (1471 – 1528) introduced the term perspective (from the Latin verb meaning “to see through”) to describe this technique and illustrated it by a series of well- known woodcuts in his book Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zyrkel und Rychtsscheyed [Instruction on measuring with compass and straight edge] in 1525.
  • Jemma Lorenat Pitzer College Jlorenat@Pitzer.Edu

    Jemma Lorenat Pitzer College [email protected]

    Jemma Lorenat Pitzer College [email protected] www.jemmalorenat.com EDUCATION PhD, Mathematics (2010 – 2015) Simon Fraser University (Canada) and Université Pierre et Marie Curie (France) Doctoral programs in mathematics at the Department of Mathematics at SFU and at the Institut de mathématiques de Jussieu, Paris Rive Gauche at UPMC Thesis: “Die Freude an der Gestalt: Methods, Figures, and Practices in Early Nineteenth Century Geometry.” Advisors: Prof. Thomas Archibald and Prof. Catherine Goldstein MA, Liberal Studies (2008 – May 2010) City University of New York Graduate Center Thesis: “The development and reception of Leopold Kronecker’s philosophy of mathematics” BA (Summa Cum Laude), Mathematics (2005 – May 2007) San Francisco State University Undergraduate Studies (2004 – 2005) University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland EMPLOYMENT 2015 – Present, Pitzer College (Claremont, CA), Assistant Professor of Mathematics 2013 – 2015, Pratt Institute (Brooklyn), Visiting Instructor 2013 – 2015, St Joseph’s College (Brooklyn), Visiting Instructor 2010 – 2012, Simon Fraser University, Teaching Assistant 2009 – 2010, College Now, Hunter College (New York), Instructor 2007 – 2010, Middle Grades Initiative, City University of New York PUBLISHED RESEARCH “Certain modern ideas and methods: “geometric reality” in the mathematics of Charlotte Angas Scott” Review of Symbolic Logic (forthcoming). “Actual accomplishments in this world: the other students of Charlotte Angas Scott” Mathematical Intelligencer (forthcoming). “Je ne point ambitionée d'être neuf: modern geometry in early nineteenth-century French textbooks” Interfaces between mathematical practices and mathematical eduation ed. Gert Schubring. Springer, 2019, pp. 69–122. “Radical, ideal and equal powers: naming objects in nineteenth century geometry” Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 23 (1), 2017, pp.
  • The ICM Through History

    The ICM Through History

    History The ICM through History Guillermo Curbera (Sevilla, Spain) It is Wednesday evening, 15th July 1936, and the City of to stay all that diffi cult night by the wounded soldier. I will Oslo is offering a dinner for the members of the Interna- never forget that long night in which, almost unable to tional Congress of Mathematicians at the Bristol Hotel. speak, broken by the bleeding, and unable to get sleep, I felt Several speeches are delivered, starting with a represent- relieved by the presence of that woman who, sitting by my ative from the municipality who greets the guests. The side, was sewing in silence under the discreet circle of light organizing committee has prepared speeches in different from the lamp, listening at regular intervals to my breath- languages. In the name of the German speaking mem- ing, taking my pulse, and scrutinizing my eyes, which only bers of the congress, Erhard Schmidt from Berlin recalls by glancing could express my ardent gratitude. the relation of the great Norwegian mathematicians Ladies and gentlemen. This generous woman, this Niels Henrik Abel and Sophus Lie with German univer- strong woman, was a daughter of Norway.” sities. For the English speaking members of the congress, Luther P. Eisenhart from Princeton stresses that “math- Beyond the impressive intensity of the personal tribute ematics is international … it does not recognize national contained in these words, the scene has a deep signifi - boundaries”, an idea, although clear to mathematicians cance when interpreted within the history of the interna- through time, was subjected to questioning in that era.
  • Generalizations of Steiner's Porism and Soddy's Hexlet

    Generalizations of Steiner's Porism and Soddy's Hexlet

    Generalizations of Steiner’s porism and Soddy’s hexlet Oleg R. Musin Steiner’s porism Suppose we have a chain of k circles all of which are tangent to two given non-intersecting circles S1, S2, and each circle in the chain is tangent to the previous and next circles in the chain. Then, any other circle C that is tangent to S1 and S2 along the same bisector is also part of a similar chain of k circles. This fact is known as Steiner’s porism. In other words, if a Steiner chain is formed from one starting circle, then a Steiner chain is formed from any other starting circle. Equivalently, given two circles with one interior to the other, draw circles successively touching them and each other. If the last touches the first, this will also happen for any position of the first circle. Steiner’s porism Steiner’s chain G´abor Dam´asdi Steiner’s chain Jacob Steiner Jakob Steiner (1796 – 1863) was a Swiss mathematician who was professor and chair of geometry that was founded for him at Berlin (1834-1863). Steiner’s mathematical work was mainly confined to geometry. His investigations are distinguished by their great generality, by the fertility of his resources, and by the rigour in his proofs. He has been considered the greatest pure geometer since Apollonius of Perga. Porism A porism is a mathematical proposition or corollary. In particular, the term porism has been used to refer to a direct result of a proof, analogous to how a corollary refers to a direct result of a theorem.
  • AN OVERVIEW of RIEMANN's LIFE and WORK a Brief Biography

    AN OVERVIEW of RIEMANN's LIFE and WORK a Brief Biography

    AN OVERVIEW OF RIEMANN'S LIFE AND WORK ROSSANA TAZZIOLI Abstract. Riemann made fundamental contributions to math- ematics {number theory, differential geometry, real and complex analysis, Abelian functions, differential equations, and topology{ and also carried out research in physics and natural philosophy. The aim of this note is to show that his works can be interpreted as a unitary programme where mathematics, physics and natural philosophy are strictly connected with each other. A brief biography Bernhard Riemann was born in Breselenz {in the Kingdom of Hanover{ in 1826. He was of humble origin; his father was a Lutheran minister. From 1840 he attended the Gymnasium in Hanover, where he lived with his grandmother; in 1842, when his grandmother died, he moved to the Gymnasium of L¨uneburg,very close to Quickborn, where in the meantime his family had moved. He often went to school on foot and, at that time, had his first health problems {which eventually were to lead to his death from tuberculosis. In 1846, in agreement with his father's wishes, he began to study the Faculty of Philology and Theology of the University of G¨ottingen;how- ever, very soon he preferred to attend the Faculty of Philosophy, which also included mathematics. Among his teachers, I shall mention Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) and Johann Benedict Listing (1808-1882), who is well known for his contributions to topology. In 1847 Riemann moved to Berlin, where the teaching of mathematics was more stimulating, thanks to the presence of Carl Gustav Jacob Ja- cobi (1804-1851), Johann Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet (1805-1859), Jakob Steiner (1796-1863), and Gotthold Eisenstein (1823-1852).
  • Revue D'histoire Des Mathématiques

    Revue D'histoire Des Mathématiques

    Revue d’Histoire des Mathématiques Radical, ideal and equal powers: new de®nitions in modern geometry 1814±1826 Jemma Lorenat Tome 23 Fascicule 2 2 0 1 7 SOCIÉTÉ MATHÉMATIQUE DE FRANCE Publiée avec le concours du Centre national de la recherche scientifique REVUE D’HISTOIRE DES MATHÉMATIQUES COMITÉ DE LECTURE Philippe Abgrall Alain Bernard June Barrow-Greene RÉDACTION Umberto Bottazzini Jean-Pierre Bourguignon Rédacteur en chef : Aldo Brigaglia Frédéric Brechenmacher Bernard Bru Rédactrice en chef adjointe : Jean-Luc Chabert Catherine Goldstein François Charrette Membres du Comité de rédaction : Karine Chemla Pierre Crépel Maarten Bullynck François De Gandt Sébastien Gandon Moritz Epple Veronica Gavagna Natalia Ermolaëva Catherine Jami Christian Gilain Marc Moyon Jeremy Gray Karen Parshall Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen Norbert Schappacher Jens Høyrup Clara Silvia Roero Jesper Lützen Laurent Rollet Philippe Nabonnand Ivahn Smadja Antoni Malet Tatiana Roque Irène Passeron Jeanne Peiffer Christine Proust David Rowe Sophie Roux Directeur de la publication : Ken Saito S. R. Sarma Stéphane Seuret Erhard Scholz Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze Stephen Stigler Dominique Tournès Bernard Vitrac Secrétariat : Nathalie Christiaën Société Mathématique de France Institut Henri Poincaré 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75231 Paris Cedex 05 Tél. : (33) 01 44 27 67 99 / Fax : (33) 01 40 46 90 96 Mél : [email protected] / URL : http//smf.emath.fr/ Périodicité : La Revue publie deux fascicules par an, de 150 pages chacun environ. Tarifs : Prix public Europe : 89 e; prix public hors Europe : 97 e; prix au numéro : 43 e. Des conditions spéciales sont accordées aux membres de la SMF. DiVusion : SMF, Maison de la SMF, Case 916 - Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9 Hindustan Book Agency, O-131, The Shopping Mall, Arjun Marg, DLF Phase 1, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, Inde © SMF No ISSN : 1262-022X Maquette couverture : Armelle Stosskopf Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 23 (2017), p.
  • Two Theorems on Geometric Constructions

    Two Theorems on Geometric Constructions

    MATHEMATICAL PERSPECTIVES BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 51, Number 3, July 2014, Pages 463–467 S 0273-0979(2014)01458-2 Article electronically published on April 11, 2014 ABOUT THE COVER: TWO THEOREMS ON GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTIONS GERALD L. ALEXANDERSON Jean-Victor Poncelet (1788–1867) was a professional engineer and sometimes mathematician who is probably best known for reviving an interest in projective geometry which had long languished since the golden age of the subject in the 17th century, the time of Pascal and Desargues. As we see in the extensive article by Dragovi´c and Radnovi´c in this issue, Poncelet’s provocative “porism” theorem has prompted much subsequent work and remains a startling example of a theorem where if a single solution exists, then an infinite number exist [6]. With the wonders of modern technology we can view this phenomenon in animated form on Wolfram Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PonceletsPorism.html). There is however another theorem in geometry that bears Poncelet’s name, the Poncelet–Steiner theorem, that answers, in part, a question anyone might raise when studying Euclidean constructions in a high school course: Can a construction by straightedge and compass be carried out without one of the two instruments—in the first case, without the straightedge? It is understood that the straightedge is just that. It has no markings on it and the desired objects are points, so one can determine a line without actually drawing it. The lines are determined only by sets of points. The first widely available answer to this question was given by Lorenzo Mascheroni (1750–1800), who, in his Geometria del Compasso of 1797, proved that any construction with the above conditions can be carried out by compass alone [4].
  • THE EVOLUTION OF. . . the Isoperimetric Problem

    THE EVOLUTION OF. . . the Isoperimetric Problem

    THE EVOLUTION OF. Edited by Abe Shenitzer and John Stillwell The Isoperimetric Problem Viktor Blasj˚ o¨ 1. ANTIQUITY. To tell the story of the isoperimetric problem one must begin by quoting Virgil: At last they landed, where from far your eyes May view the turrets of new Carthage rise; There bought a space of ground, which Byrsa call’d, From the bull’s hide they first inclos’d, and wall’d. (Aeneid, Dryden’s translation) This refers to the legend of Dido. Virgil’s version has it that Dido, daughter of the king of Tyre, fled her home after her brother had killed her husband. Then she ended up on the north coast of Africa, where she bargained to buy as much land as she could enclose with an oxhide. So she cut the hide into thin strips, and then she faced, and presumably solved, the problem of enclosing the largest possible area within a given perimeter— the isoperimetric problem. But earthly factors mar the purity of the problem, for surely the clever Dido would have chosen an area by the coast so as to exploit the shore as part of the perimeter. This is essential for the mathematics as well as for the progress of the story. Virgil tells us that Aeneas, on his quest to found Rome, is shipwrecked and blown ashore at Carthage. Dido falls in love with him, but he does not return her love. He sails away and Dido kills herself. Kline concludes [23, p. 135]: And so an ungrateful and unreceptive man with a rigid mind caused the loss of a potential mathematician.
  • Steiner's Porism in Finite Miquelian Möbius Planes

    Steiner's Porism in Finite Miquelian Möbius Planes

    Steiner's Porism in finite Miquelian M¨obiusplanes Norbert Hungerb¨uhler(ETH Z¨urich) Katharina Kusejko (ETH Z¨urich) Abstract We investigate Steiner's Porism in finite Miquelian M¨obiusplanes constructed over the pair of finite fields GF (pm) and GF (p2m), for p an odd prime and m ≥ 1. Properties of common tangent circles for two given concentric circles are discussed and with that, a finite version of Steiner's Porism for concentric circles is stated and proved. We formulate conditions on the length of a Steiner chain by using the quadratic residue theorem in GF (pm). These results are then generalized to an arbitrary pair of non-intersecting circles by introducing the notion of capacitance, which turns out to be invariant under M¨obiustransformations. Finally, the results are compared with the situation in the classical Euclidean plane. Keywords: Finite M¨obiusplanes, Steiner's Theorem, Steiner chains, capacitance Mathematics Subject Classification: 05B25, 51E30, 51B10 Introduction In the 19th century, the Swiss mathematician Jakob Steiner (1796 - 1863) discovered a beautiful result about mutually tangential circles in the Euclidean plane, also known as Steiner's Porism. One version reads as follows. Theorem 0.1 (Steiner's Porism). Let 1 and 2 be disjoint circles in the Euclidean plane. Con- sider a sequence of different circles ;:::;B , whichB are tangential to both and . Moreover, T1 Tk B1 B2 let i and i+1 be tangential for all i = 1; : : : ; k 1. If 1 and k are tangential as well, then there areT infinitelyT many such chains. In particular,− everyT chain ofT consecutive tangent circles closes after k steps.