DOCSLIB.ORG

Deployments & Oobs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): IJAAF in China Aug 1937 Bombers 3+2 Chutai Heavy Ki.21 I? bombers 4 Lt Bomber Ki.32 Fighters 5+2 Chutai Ki.10 I Recon 6+2 Chutai ? IJNAF in China Aug 1937 Carrier Based 1st Carrier Div Hosho A2N fighters Operating individually Ryujo ~30 a/c in the East China Sea Kaga Aug-37 near Shanghai 22 B2M bombers 14 D1A1 DBs 16 A2N fighters Land-based 1st Rengo Kokutai (Combined AG) Kanoya Kokutai 18 G3M1 Taihoku, Taipei Kizarazu Kokutai 24 G3M1 Omura, then Cheju Islands 2nd Rengo Kokutai (Combined AG) 12th Kokutai 12 A4N1 fighter Aug-37: Dairen; 12 D1A1 DB Sep-37: Shangahai 12 B3Y1 bomber 13th Kokutai 12 A5M fighter Aug-37: Dairen; 6 D1A2 DB Sep-37: Shangahai 12 B4Y1 torpedo bomber Part of 3rd Fleet Idzumo (HQ) Shanghai 8th Cruiser Div Shanghai (Whang-po) 1st DD sqdn IJNAF in China Nov 1937 Carrier Based 1st Carrier Div Ryujo ~30 a/c Kaga 32 B4Y1 bombers 16 D1A2 DBs 16 A5M fighters Land-based 1st Rengo Kokutai (Combined AG) Kanoya Kokutai 36 G3M2 bombers Taipei Kisaru Kokutai? 2nd Rengo Kokutai (Combined AG) 12th Kokutai 12 A5M fighter Sep-37: Shangahai 12 D1A1 DB 12 B3Y1 bomber 13th Kokutai 12 A5M fighter Sep-37: Shangahai 6 D1A2 DB 23-Feb-07 Page 289 Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): 12 B4Y1 bomber Imperial Japanese Army Air Force Deployment: July 1942 Kokugan = Air Army Hikoshidan = Air Division Hikodan = Air Brigade or Regiment Sentai = Btn? Hikotai = Air Btn? Chutai = Squadron 1st Kokugan Home Islands and Manchuria 1st Hikoshidan: 17,18,19, 20 Hikodans 2nd Kokugan Manchukuo 2nd Hikoshidan: 2, 6, 7, 8 Hikodans 4th Hikoshidan: 4, 9, 10, 13 Hikodans 15th & 28th Doritsu Hikotai (4 independent Chutais) 2nd Sentai (strategic recon) 3rd Kokugan Southern Front and China: Burma: 4th Hikodan + 83rd Hikotai (3 sentai), including: • 64th Sentai in Ki.43 II • 13th Sentai in Ki.45 Toryu • 77th Sentai in Ki.61? Malaya: 7th Hikodan (3 Sentai + 3 transport Chutai) Java: 3 Sentai + 1 Chutai of 3rd Hikodan Sumatra: 2 Sentai of the 12th Hikodan Indochina: 2 Sentai (1 ftr, 1 bombr?) and 2 transport Chutai Phillipines: 3 Sentai China: 3rd Hikoshidan w/8 Sentai (includes 25th, 33rd, 54th and 62nd) New Guinea/ (Dec) 6th Hikoshidan (110 a/c, mostly Ki.43 & Ki.48). Later transferred to the Rabaul 4th Kokugan 4th Kokugan NewGuinea 6th Hikoshidan 7th Hikoshidan (Aug-43) 1st Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko) Wewak 14th Hikodan Hollandia 11th Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko) 13th Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko) Wewak? 24th Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko) Wewak? 59th Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko) But 68th Sentai (Ki.61-I) Wewak 77th Sentai (Ki.61-I) 78th Sentai (Ki.43-II-Ko + Ki.61) Wewak 244th Sentai (ftr) 248th Sentai (ftr) (Oct-44) Philippines 237 aircraft / 83 fighters, including 24th Sentai (withdrawn from New Guinea Oct-43) 200th Sentai (with Ki.84 new unit in Oct-44) Rabaul: a Description Rabaul town, with small phone net and small power source. Dominated by small, dormant volcanic mountains (good siting for AAA). • Simpson Harbor (immediate to the town) capable of holding 300,000 tons of shipping. • Lakunai field – ex-civilian field soon equipped as fighter field next to Rabaul town. 4300 ft x 630 ft. 90 fighter, 10 bomber revetments, 2.5 miles of taxiways. • Vunakunau field – 9 miles SW of R-town. Built as lt bomber field by Aussies. 5200 ft x 720 ft (concrete 4200 ft x 135 ft). 90 fighter, 60 bomber revetments, 6.5 miles taxiway 23-Feb-07 Page 290 Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): • Rapopo field – 14 miles SE of Rabaul town. Built by Japanese Dec-42. 4600 ft by 630 ft, all concrete. 94 bomber, 10 fighter revetments. • Keravat field – SW of R-town. Built by Japanese for IJA. Drainage problems; eventually became 4200 ft emergency strip. • Tobera field – “several miles south” of the other major fields, covered in steel plates, 75 fighter revetments. By Nov-43, AAA was • IJN: 8x 127mm, 15x 120mm • IJA: 95 80mm + 70mm • 250 smaller AAA weapons (25mm, then 13mm MGs?) Wake Island Invasion (Dec-41) F4F-3/-3A TBD-1 SBD-2/-3 TF-11 USS Lexington VF-2 18 F2A-3 (Exc) VT-2 15 TBD (Avg) VS-2 14 SBD-3 Dixon Brown CLAG: Ault Ramsey Miller VB-2 17 SBD-3 Felt Raid USS Indianapolis, 2x CA Marshalls. 9x DDs, 1x oiler TF-14 USS Saratoga VF-3 13 F4F (Gd) Thach VT-3 11 TBD (Avg) VS-3 21 SBD-3 Hoerner Fletcher CSAG: Cruise VMF-221 14 F2A-3 Magly VB-3 21 SBD-3 Leslie Take 14 McCaul VMF-221 3x CA F2A-3s to 8x DDs , USS Neches (old, slow oiler) Wake USS Tangier with troops, ammo, supplies, and radar. VMF-221can take off from carrier,but must land at a base. Wake VMF-211: 12 F4F-3 Island Wake Hiryu 27 A6M2 (Exc) 18 B5N2 Kate (Exc) 16 D3A2 Val (Exc) Island Soryu 27 A6M2 (Exc) 18 B5N2 Kate (Exc) 16 D3A2 Val (Exc) Attack 2x CA Force 2x DDs Abe Marshall 4 CA Area Ops 2 CL Support Force Goto Solomons: IJN in South Seas Region: 1-Feb-42 Rabaul & 24th Koku Sentai (RADM Goto) Truk Chitose Kokutai (det) 27 G3M2 Nell 18 A5M4 Claude Yokohama Kokutai H6K4 Mavis Roi Chitose Kokutai (Capt Ohashi) 18 A5M4 Claude (LCdr Isoarashi) Taroa Chitose Kokutai (det) 9 G3M2 Nell (Nakai) 15 A5M4 (Lt Kurukane) Jaluit Yokohama Kokutai (det) 6 H6K4 (LCdr Koizumi) Makin Yokohama Kokutai (det) 3 H6K4 (Lt. Sakaki) 23-Feb-07 Page 291 Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): Marshall Islands Raiders (Feb-42) F4F-3/-3A TBD-1 SBD-2/-3 TF-8 USS Enterprise VF-6 18 (Good) VT-6 18/18 Lindsay VS-6 18 Hopping Halsey CEAG: Young McClusky (Avg) VB-6 18 Hollingsworth Corbin Gray CA Northampton CA Salt Lake City, Chester 3x DDs TF-17 USS Yorktown VF-42 18 –3s (Avg) VT-5 12 (Avg) Taylor VS-5 19 (Avg) Burch Fletcher CYAG: Smiley Pederson VB-5 19 (Avg) Armstrong CA Louisville CL St. Louis DDs Hughes Russell, Sims, Walke Coral Sea (May-42) TF-17 USS Yorktown VF-42 18 (Avg) VT-5 12 (Avg) Taylor VS-5 13 (Avg) Burch Fletcher CYAG: Pederson Fenton VB-5 15 (Avg) Short CA Astoria CA Portland, Chester DDs Russell, Hammann, Aylwin, Dewey TF-11 USS Lexington VS-2 27/28 (Avg) VT-2 12/13 TBDs VS-2 15 (Avg) Ault Fitch CAG-2: VB-2 17 (Avg) CA Minneapolis CA New Orleans, Chicago DDs Morris, Anderson, Phelps, Monaghan DD Sims Oiler Neosho USAAF Townsville 22nd BG Low availability, 2nd BS 92 B-25s & B-26s generally green 33rd BS units 18th Recn 8th FG 50 P-39s Charters 3rd BG (Lt) 8th BS A-20As 13th BS 8 B-25Cs 89th BS 19 A-24s 90th BS 8 B-25Cs Operation MO Forces Carrier Div 5 Zuikaku: 20 (Exc) Lt Okajima B 19 Kate Subota 20 Val Ema V Adm Takagi Hikotaicho: LCdr Lt Yamamoto (BJr) Shimazaki (incl 1/3 Vet, 1 Vet/Ace/Hero) Shokaku: 20 (Exc) Lt Hoashi 20 Ichihara 22 Val Yamaguchi Takahashi Lt Tsukamoto (BJr) 2 CA 6 DDs 23-Feb-07 Page 292 Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): Pt Moresby Shoho: 8 Zeros, 4 Claude 6 Kates Assault Force Snr Buntaicho: Lt (Good) Lt. Nakamoto R Adm Goto Notomi 4 CA 11 transports Tulagi Force Okinoshima R Adm Shima 2 DD (Kikuzuki), 1 transport Kamikawa Maru Seaplanes Midway The Big one….. USN: Carrier Striking Force TF17 CV-5 Yorktown Pederson (CYAG) (also FDO) Fletcher Buckmaster VF-3 Thach 25 F4F-4 (Vet/Hero, 2 Vet, 13 Reg, Reg/Hero, 7 Green) VB-3 Leslie 17 SBD-3 VS-5 Short 16 SBD-3 VT-5 Massey 12 TBD TG 17.2 Cruiser Group CAs: Astoria, Portland RAdm Smith TG 17.4 ComDesRon 2 6 DDs: TF16 CV-6 McClusky (CEAG) 1 SBD Spruance Enterprise VF-6 Gray 27 F4F-4 Murray VB-6 Best 15 SBD-3 VS-6 Gallaher 17 SBD-3 VT-6 Lindsay 14 TDB CV-8 Hornet Ring (CHAG) 1 SBD Mitscher VF-8 Mitchell 27 F4F-4 (1 Vet, 7 Reg, 20 Green) VB-8 Johnson 19 SBD-3 VS-8 Rodee 16 SBD-3 VT-8 Waldron 15 TBD TG 16.2 Cruiser Group CAs: New Orleans, Minneapolis, Vincennes, Northampton, Pennsacola RAdm Kincaid CL: Atlanta TG 16.4 ComDesRon 2 9 DDs: USN: Midway Shore-based Air PatWing 1 32 PBY-5A Catalina PatWing 2 VT-8 Det 6 TBF Avengers (first combat for Avengers) MAG 22 VMF-221 20 F2A-3, 7F4F-3 VMSB-241 12 SB2U-3, 16 SBD-2 US 7th AF 26th BS 6 B-17E detach 431st BS 6 B-17E 31st BS 2 B-17E 72nd BS 1 B-17E 69th BS / 38th BG 2 B-26A 18th Recon Sqdn / 22nd BG 2 B-26A USN: Midway Shore-based Air Command Structure 23-Feb-07 Page 293 Deployments & OOBs Japan (Pacific): First Carrier Striking Group Carr Div 1 Akagi (Flag) Hikotaicho Buntaicho Jr. Buntaicho Aoki 21 A6M2 Zero Fighters Lt Itaya Lt Shirane Ayao 21 D3A-2 Val Dive Bombers 21 B5N2 Kate Torp Bmbrs Kaga Hikotaicho Okada 21 A6M2 Zero Fighters 21 D3A-2 Val Dive Bombers 30 B5N2 Kate Torp Bmbrs Carr Div 2 Hiryu Hikotaicho Lt. Tomonaga Buntaicho Jr. Buntaicho RAdm Kaku 21 A6M2 Zero Fighters Lt. Mori Shigeru Lt Shigematsu Yasuhiro Yamaguchi Lt. Mori 21 D3A-2 Val Dive Bombers Lt Kobayashi Michio Lt Yamashita Michiji 21 B5N2 Kate Torp Bmbrs Lt Kikuchi*1 Lt Kadano Hiroharu* Lt Hashimoto Soryu Hikotaicho Buntaicho Jr.
Recommended publications
  • Davis-Monthan Afb 1940 - 1976 Preface

    Davis-Monthan Afb 1940 - 1976 Preface

    DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB 1940 - 1976 PREFACE This history, in its final form, is the result of almost three years of off-and-on effort on the part of this historian. It has had to be sandwiched in between the myriad taskings associated with three different assignments. It began at Davis-Monthan AFB in 1979 while assigned there as the historian for the 390th Strategic Missile Wing. My research notes and supporting documents came with me when I was subsequently transferred to the Headquarters SAC Office of the Historian and then later to the 4000th Satellite Operations Group at Offutt AFB, Nebraska. The need for a complete base history became painfully obvious as soon as I began my initial research. There was very little data available at Davis-Monthan AFB concerning the history of the installation; other than a few short Information Office history handouts of the type often given to newcomers and visitors. The majority of substantive material on base activities over the years had been lost as host units switched repeatedly throughout the station’s existence. Those units were subsequently inactiviated or transferred to other bases. Accordingly, the majority of material presented herein had to be obtained at the Albert F. Simpson Historical Research Center, Maxwell AFB, Alabama. Without the invaluable assistance of the many dedicated professionals at the Simpson Center, this history could never have been compiled. The transfer of Davis-Monthan AFB from the Strategic Air Command to the Tactical Air Command on 30 September 1976 ends the period of
  • Military Italian F-35A Lightning Ii

    Military Italian F-35A Lightning Ii

    MILITARY ITALIAN F-35A LIGHTNING II ndoubtedly the most complex, partner, with the Netherlands. Subsequently, Eighteen months on, thanks to the advanced and often controversial Italy was the fi rst nation to build and activate cooperation of the Italian MoD and the programme ever been launched in a Final Assembly and Checkout facility, Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force) and a the history of aviation: an accurate where the F-35 Lightning II is assembled. discussion with Colonel Davide Marzinotto, description of the F-35 Joint Strike Italy subsequently fl ew the fi rst F-35 aircraft 32° Stormo’s commander, AIR International UFighter programme, especially in Italy. produced outside the United States. Italy was was granted clearance to gain fi rst-hand December will mark the 20th anniversary also the fi rst nation in the world (excluding experience of the progress made by the Italian of the nation’s participation in the the United States) to introduce the new F-35 fl eet. programme following the signing of a fi ghter into service. The fi rst examples arrived Colonel Marzinotto is a former AMX and memorandum of agreement for the Concept at Amendola Air Base on December 12, 2016, F-2000 pilot. He commanded 20° Gruppo, Demonstration Phase. Four years later, destined for 13° Gruppo (13th Squadron), the Italian F-2000 operational conversion Italy joined the System Development and one of the component squadrons with the unit, assignment to the F-35 Joint Program Demonstration (SDD) phase as a second tier resident 32° Stormo (32nd Wing). O ce in Crystal City, Virginia, prior to Quinta generazione Italiana Troupe Azzurra Troupe 42 | www.airinternational.com ITALIAN F-35A LIGHTNING II MILITARY undergoing F-35 pilot conversion and be undertaken concurrently with the initial confi guration ahead of Block 3F, the fi rst subsequent appointment as the commander production phase su cient to equip US full-up operational standard.
  • Italian Specail Report

    Italian Specail Report

    SHAPING THE FUTURE OF ITALIAN AIRPOWER 10/13/15 Second Line of Defense Second Line of Defense Shaping the Future of Italian Airpower SECOND LINE OF DEFENSE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 2 THE FIRST FLIGHT AS A KEY BASELINE EVENT .................................................................................................... 2 THE ITALIAN AIR FORCE SHAPES A WAY AHEAD: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ITALIAN CHIEF OF STAFF ......... 6 ITALIAN AIRPOWER MODERNIZATION: A DISCUSSION WITH THE EDITOR OF RIVISTA ITALIANA DIFESA ..... 8 RESHAPING CONCEPTS OF OPERATIONS: EUROFIGHTER, THE F-35, THE UK AND ITALY ............................. 10 THE RECONFIGURATION OF EUROFIGHTER ................................................................................................................ 11 THE IMPACT OF THE F-35 FLEET ............................................................................................................................... 12 WORKING NEW CONCEPTS OF OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................. 14 EVOLVING WEAPONS AT THE VORTEX OF THE CHANGE .............................................................................................. 15 LEVERAGING WEAPONS COMMONALITIES: THE CASE OF THE METEOR MISSILE ............................................................... 16 AN UPDATE ON EUROFIGHTER MODERNIZATION: THE
  • ANNEX a to GAS (A)

    ANNEX a to GAS (A)

    GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 ANNEX A to GAS (A) STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) FOR GLOBAL INTO-PLANE REFUELING (IPR) IN SUPPORT OF WORLDWIDE MILITARY OPERATIONS Page 1 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 This document contains NSPA proprietary information. Reproduction or disclosure of any part without prior approval by NSPA is not permitted. AMENDMENT RECORD REVISION/AMENDMENT PAGES DATE OF ISSUE REMARKS 1.0 Version 1 35 Draft for NSPA Review Page 2 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 APPROVAL RECORD OFFICE / POSITION DATE NAME SIGNATURE Customer Representative 04JUL19 Various per e-mail NSPA Technical Officer Bernd JANSEN NSPA Project Lead Nicolas LEBRUN NSPA LK-F Branch Chief Mark KEKUEWA NSPA Contracting Officer Torsten ZAENGER Page 3 of 36 NATO UNCLASSIFIED GAS (A) – SOW Annex A Version 2.0 15 July 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Scope ......................................................................................................... 6 2. Applicable Documents ................................................................................ 7 3. Command and Control ............................................................................... 9 4. Planning Factors / Constraints ................................................................... 9 5. Description of the Services Required ....................................................... 10 6. Schedules, Milestones and Operating Hours ........................................... 14 7. Contractor Human
  • 4 Convoy Presentation Final V1.1

    4 Convoy Presentation Final V1.1

    ALLIED CONVOY OPERATIONS IN THE BATTLE OF THE ATLANTIC 1939-43 INTRODUCTION • History of Allied convoy operations IS the history of the Battle of the Atlantic • Scope of this effort: convoy operations along major transatlantic convoy routes • Detailed overview • Focus on role of Allied intelligence in the Battle of the Atlantic OUTLINE • Convoy Operations in the First Battle of the Atlantic, 1914-18 • Anglo-Canadian Convoy Operations, September 1939 – September 1941 • Enter The Americans: Allied Convoy Operations, September 1941 – Fall 1942 • The Allied Convoy System Fully Realized: Allied Convoy Operations, Fall 1942 – Summer 1943 THE FIRST BATTLE OF THE ATLANTIC, 1914-18 • 1914-17: No convoy operations § All vessels sailed independently • Kaiserliche Marine use of U-boats primarily focused on starving Britain into submission § Prize rules • February 1915: “Unrestricted submarine warfare” § May 7, 1915 – RMS Lusitania u U-20 u 1,198 dead – 128 Americans • February 1917: unrestricted submarine warfare resumed § Directly led to US entry into WWI THE FIRST BATTLE OF THE ATLANTIC, 1914-18 • Unrestricted submarine warfare initially very effective § 25% of all shipping bound for Britain in March 1917 lost to U-boat attack • Transatlantic convoys instituted in May 1917 § Dramatically cut Allied losses • Post-war, Dönitz conceptualizes Rudeltaktik as countermeasure to convoys ANGLO-CANADIAN CONVOY OPERATIONS, SEPTEMBER 1939 – SEPTEMBER 1941 GERMAN U-BOAT FORCE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR • On the outbreak of WWII, Hitler directed U-boat force
  • Merekaitseliit 1933-1940/1992-2015

    Merekaitseliit 1933-1940/1992-2015

    MEREKAITSELIIT 1933–1940 / 1992–2015 Tallinn 2015 Väljaandja: Kaitseliit Koostaja: Tanel Lään Keelenõu: Piret Pääsuke Toimetaja: major Tanel Rütman Küljendus: Arielle Carroll Kaane kujundus: Erkki Pung Trükk: Hepter Grupp OÜ Esikaanel: Kaitseliidu Narva maleva „Nordost“ Merekaitseliidu 1937. a. sügisõppusel. Ringis: Kaitseliidu Saaremaa maleva pealik kolonelleitnant Kristjan Moora lööb naela Meremalevkonna lipu vardasse, tema selja taga kapten Jaen Teär 23. juunil 2014. Tagakaanel: Signalistid lähevad võistluspaika Narva-Jõesuus 1939. a. juu- nis. Õppetund mootoriklassis mereüksuste pealikute kursusel 1938. aastal. Veeteede Ameti hüdrograafialaev ja AS PKL vedurlaev „Helmut Kanter“ 2006. a. võidupühal Küdema lahel ISBN 978-9949-9443-1-6 Eessõna Hea Lugeja! Sa hoiad käes raamatut, mis püüab linnulennult anda ülevaate Kaitseliidu meren- dusalasest tegevusest läbi aegade. Algmaterjalina on käesoleva väljaande esimeses osas kasutatud lisaks vähestele arhiivimaterjalidele kirjandust, mälestusi, intervjuusid ja Kaitseliidu ajakirja Kaitse Kodu! ning malevate Teated 1930-1940. aastate numbreid. Viimastes aval- datud käskkirjad ja erinevad protokollid võimaldavad taastada suhteliselt täpselt Merekaitseliidu tolleaegse kronoloogia. Olukirjeldusi õppustest ja tegemistest leidub aga ajakirjas Kaitse Kodu!. Käesolev kogumik annab hea ajaloolise ülevaate Eestis rannikukaitse arendami- seks tehtud ettepanekutest ja otsustest aastatel 1930-1940. Võrdlusena saa- me ülevaate ka sellest, mida me pärast taasiseseisvumist oleme samas valdkonnas tänaseks
  • Issue 5 Alumni & Affiliates Newsletter

    Issue 5 Alumni & Affiliates Newsletter

    Manchester & Salford Universities Royal Naval Unit M&S URNU Issue 5 Alumni & Affiliates Newsletter Message from the Boss Issue 5 I can hardly believe it’s been contractors and our own to find our sea legs again and July 2013 six months since I last took engineers have delivered the visit some of our most loved the opportunity to write in this most up to date and capable ports whilst again achieving newsletter but in the I P2000 in the Royal Navy. the URNU Mission Statement. ntervening period, the unit Despite a lack of ship, the We will again return to a busy has been extremely busy and unit and it’ members have in autumn programme of has gone through immense no way been idle and this time recruiting and inducting new change. The greatest chal- has allowed us to strengthen members. The annual HMS BITER lenge of recent months has our links with the wider armed Trafalgar night dinner and a BFPO 229 undoubtedly been the forces. As you will read later hectic series of Sea Training M&S URNU extended maintenance period in this newsletter, members weekends. The busy University Barracks and re-engineering of HMS have travelled the length and academic term will culminate Boundary Lane MANCHESTER BITER. What began as a breadth of the world, on a in the Re-dedication of HMS M15 6DH simple 8 week overhaul and plethora of RN ships and BITER. This will be a huge engine replacement quickly yachts and we are all a little event, held at the Imperial T: 0161 237 3308 developed into a major fitter for the amount of sport War Museum North when we [email protected] project.
  • 1.0 1.1 MICROFILMED by NPPSO-NAVAL Distria

    1.0 1.1 MICROFILMED by NPPSO-NAVAL Distria

    1.0 2.5 lU ^t 2.2 S E4 ^ « a2.0 1.1 1.8 DATE /2l^^ 1.25 1.4 1.6 jZ J '' ,;'Jh'^- |^g^4(z^y'j/F^^L^->4'<r //2> / ^/S'<D /i^ j/^ MICROFILMED BY NPPSO-NAVAL DISTRia WASHINGTON ilCROFILM SECTION REEL TARGET - START AND END NDW-NPPSO-5210/1 (6.-78) Office of Kaval Records-and History Ships' Histories Section Havy Department ; • HISTORY'OP USS MASSEY (DD 778) • The USS MASSEY, one of the Navy's nev 2,200 ton destroyers, has had an eventful career. She was. built at the Seattle plant of the Todd-Pacific Shipbuilding Company. Mrs. Lance E. Massey christened the ship on Septem'ber- 12, 19^4, in honor of her late' husband,, Lieu• tenant Commander Lance E. Massey, USN, one of the early heroes of the Pacific- war. As the Commander of Torpedo Squadron Three in the Battle of Midway, Commander Massey died pressing home an assault through in• tense antiaircraft and fighter opposition that resulted In the sinking of two Japanese aircraft carriers. .On November 24, 1944, in Seattle, the USS MASSEY was officially placed in commission with Commander Charles W, Aldrich, USN,- as her first 'commanding officer. For the next week, the MASSEY continued • on her final outfitting alongside the dock before getting underway on • .'November 50 on the first of her pre-shakedown trial runs. After con• ducting various gunnery, radar, and degauslng tests and-exercises in .the.Puget Sound area, the MASSEY departed for San Diego on December 12. Here she underwent six weeks of various drills and inspections climaxed by her final military Inspection of January 25.
  • CVE27) Kamikaze Damage Off Samar USS SANTEE (CVE29

    CVE27) Kamikaze Damage Off Samar USS SANTEE (CVE29

    CONFIDENTIAL SECTION V U.S.S. SUWANEE (CVE27) U.S.S. SANTEE (CVE29) Kamikaze Damage Kamikaze and Under water Damage Off Samar Off Samar 25 and 26 October 1944 25 October 1944 U.S.S. SANGAMON (CVE26) Kamikaze Damage Off Okinawa 4 May 1945 Class ..... ..... ... SANGAMON (CVE26) Length (0.A.). ... 553 Ft. 0 In. Comissioned as Carrier s Beam (O.A.) .. ..... 114 F t. 3 In. CVE26 ...... AUGUST 1-942 CVE27 § 29 . SEPTEMBER 1942 Displacement (Full Load).. 24,275 Dr ait (Full Load). 31 Ft. 0 In. Tons Refer ences: (a) C.O. SUWANEE ltr. CVE27/Al6- 3(3), Ser ial 008 of 6 November 1944 (Action Repor t). (b) SUWANEE War Damage Repor t p r epar ed by Navy Yard, Puget Sound. (c) C.O. SANTEE ltr. CVE29/Al6 - 3, Ser ial 10018 of 5 November 1944 (Action Report). (d) C.O. SANTEE ltr. CVE29/Lll- l, Ser ial 433 of 7 Januar y 1945 (War Damage Repor t). (e) SANTEE War Damage Repor t Prepar ed by Navy Yard, Pearl Harbor. (f) C.O. SANGAMON ltr. Al6- 3/CVE26, Serial 044 of 20 Ma) 1945 (Action Report). (g) C.O. SANGAMON ltr. A9/CVE26, Serial 041 of 8 May 1945 (War Damage Report). Plates V - 1 SUWANEE - Kamikaze Damage V -2 SANTEE - Kamikaze and Under water Damage V -3 SANGAMON - Kamikaze Damage V- 4 ASHTABULA (A051) and MISSISSINEWA (A057) - P r ofile and Tank Ar rangement V - 5 COMMENCEMENT BAY (CVE105) - P r ofile and Deck Arrangement Photogr aphs - Furnished as follows : 5- 1 to 5- 10 by C.O.
  • Building a Safe, Secure, and Credible NATO Nuclear Posture

    Building a Safe, Secure, and Credible NATO Nuclear Posture

    Building a Safe, Secure, and Credible NATO Nuclear Posture NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE 1776 Eye St, NW | Suite 600 | Washington DC 20006 www.nti.org Steve Andreasen, Isabelle Williams, Brian Rose, @NTI_WMD Hans M. Kristensen, and Simon Lunn www.facebook.com/nti.org Foreword by Ernest J. Moniz and Sam Nunn ABOUT THE NUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE The Nuclear Threat Initiative works to protect our lives, environment, and quality of life now and for future generations. We work to prevent catastrophic attacks with weapons of mass destruction and disruption (WMDD)—nuclear, biological, radiological, chemical, and cyber. Founded in 2001 by former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn and philanthropist Ted Turner, who continue to serve as co-chairs, NTI is guided by a prestigious, international board of directors. Ernest J. Moniz serves as chief executive officer and co-chair; Des Browne is vice chair; and Joan Rohlfing serves as president. www.nti.org Cover: A Dutch F-16 takes off from Leeuwarden Airbase in the Netherlands in 2011. PHOTO BY ROBIN UTRECHT/AFP/GETTY IMAGES Building a Safe, Secure, and Credible NATO Nuclear Posture Steve Andreasen Isabelle Williams Brian Rose Hans M. Kristensen Simon Lunn Foreword by Ernest J. Moniz and Sam Nunn January 2018 The views expressed in this publication are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of NTI, its Board of Directors, or other institutions with which the authors are associated. © 2018 Nuclear Threat Initiative All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher and copyright holder.
  • US Invasion Fleet, Guam, 12 July

    US Invasion Fleet, Guam, 12 July

    US Invasion Fleet Guam 12 July - August 1944 Battleships USS Alabama (BB-60) USS California (BB-44) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Idaho (BB-42) USS Indiana (BB-58) USS Iowa (BB-61) USS New Jersey (BB-62) USS New Mexico (BB-40) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38) USS Tennessee (BB-43) USS Washington (BB-56) Carriers: USS Anzio (CVE-57) USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24) USS Bunker Hill (CV-17) USS Cabot (CVL-28) USS Chenango (CVE-28) USS Corregidor (CVE-58) USS Essex (CV-9) USS Franklin (CV-13) USS Gambier Bay (CVE-73) USS Hornet (CV-12) USS Kalinin Bay (CVE-68) USS Kitkun Bay (CVE-71) USS Kwajalein (CVE-98) USS Langley (CVL-27) USS Lexington (CV-16) USS Midway (CVE-63) USS Monteray (CVL-36) USS Nehenta Bay (CVE-74) USS Princeton (CVL-23) USS Sangamon (CVE-26) USS San Jacinto (CVL-30) USS Santee (CVE-29) USS Wasp (CV-18) USS Yorktown (CV-10) Cruisers: USS Biloxi (CL-80) USS Birmingham (CL-62) USS Boston (CA-6) USS Canberra (CA-70) USS Cleveland (CL-55) USS Denver (CL-58) USS Honolulu (CL-18) USS Houston (CL-81) USS Indianapolis (CA-35) USS Louisville (CA-28) USS Miami (CL-89) USS Minneapolis (CA-36) 1 USS Mobile (CL-63) USS Montpelier (CL-57) USS New Orleans (CA-32) USS Oakland (CL-95) USS Reno (CL-96) USS St. Louis (CL-49) USS San Diego (CL-53) USS San Francisco (CA-38) USS San Juan (CL-54) USS Santa Fe (CL-60) USS Vincennes (CL-64) USS Wichita (CA-15) Destroyers USS Abbot (DD-629) USS Acree (DE-167) USS Anthony (DD-515) USS Auliek (DD-569) USS Charles F.
  • Bedding Down Terrain During ‘Northern Task Force Air Commander

    Bedding Down Terrain During ‘Northern Task Force Air Commander

    Italy deployed F-35A Lightning IIs operationally for the fi rst time in October to undertake the NATO air policing mission safeguarding Iceland’s airspace, and Combat Aircraft was granted exclusive access to the detachment at Kefl avík. REPORT AND PHOTOS Giovanni Colla Combat Aircraft December 2019 ITH ITS REMOTE 2019 — we have supported this NATO geographical location mission in Iceland.’ The AM has previously and total lack of deployed Euro ghter F-2000As for organic air defense the mission. capabilities, Iceland Working alongside the Icelandic relies completely on Coast Guard, the TFA came under the Wits NATO allies for air policing. A periodic leadership of the Comando Operativo di presence of NATO ghter aircraft at Vertice Interforze (Italian Joint Command Ke avík air base is viewed as being Operations) and was supported by around su cient to maintain the integrity of its 130 personnel. airspace. In contrast with the Baltic Air Col Sprea co added: ‘The planning for Policing (BAP) mission, which involves this mission began in the rst months continuous coverage, the Icelandic of the year and we received o cial government has consistently only con rmation for it in mid-July.’ A team requested an average of three annual from Amendola began to work on deployments, with each lasting for three speci c requirements including scramble to four weeks. operations that focused on the Icelandic In late September, the Italian Air Force scenario. An advance party then ew to (Aeronautica Militare, AM) spearheaded Iceland on September 23 to set up a force the third Icelandic ghter detachment protection team, a headquarters and the of 2019 under its Task Force Air (TFA) necessary communications equipment.