Chapters
1 Introduction 5 1.1 Rotherham's Local Plan 5 1.2 Site Allocations for New Development 6 1.3 Development Management Policies 7 1.4 Designations 7 2 Where are we now? 8 2.1 Rotherham's Local Plan: Previous Stages of Preparation 8 3 How have we Identified Site Allocations? 10 4 Integrated Impact Assessment 13 5 Designations 15 5.1 Local Wildlife Sites 15 5.2 Regionally Important Geological Sites 15 5.3 Conservation Areas 15 5.4 Strategic Green Infrastructure Assets 16 6 Policies Map 18 7 Draft Development Management Policies 19 7.1 Delivering development in sustainable locations 20 7.2 Creating mixed and attractive places to live 25 7.3 Supporting a dynamic economy 30 7.4 Movement and accessibility 42 7.5 Managing the natural and historic environment 46 7.6 Creating safe and sustainable communities 84
Appendices : Proposed Sites
1 Proposed Development Sites in Rotherham Urban Area 104
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 1.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 104 1.2 Settlement Profile 105 1.3 Bassingthorpe Farm (Core Strategy Broad Location for Growth) 108 1.4 Location Maps of Rotherham Urban Area 112 1.4.1 North West Rotherham 112 1.4.2 Rawmarsh / Parkgate 115 1.4.3 Aldwarke 117 1.4.4 Thrybergh 119 1.4.5 East Rotherham 121 1.4.6 Lower Don and Rother Valley 123 1.4.7 Rotherham Town Centre 125 1.5 Schedule of Sites 127 2 Proposed Development Sites in Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common 132 2.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 132 2.2 Settlement Profile 133 2.3 Location Map of Sites 134 2.4 Schedule of Sites 136 3 Proposed Development Sites in Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield Common 140 3.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 140 3.2 Settlement Profile 141 3.3 Location Map of Sites 141 3.4 Schedule of Sites 144 4 Proposed Development Sites in Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton and West Melton 146 4.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 146 4.2 Settlement Profile 147 4.3 Location Map of Sites 148 4.4 Schedule of Sites 150 5 Proposed Development Sites in Kiveton Park and Wales 152
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 5.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 152 5.2 Settlement Profile 153 5.3 Location Map of Sites 153 5.4 Schedule of Sites 156 6 Proposed Development Sites in Maltby and Hellaby 157 6.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 157 6.2 Settlement Profile 158 6.3 Location Map of Sites 159 6.4 Schedule of Sites 161 7 Proposed Development Sites in Aston, Aughton and Swallownest 163 7.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 163 7.2 Settlement Profile 164 7.3 Location Map of Sites 165 7.4 Schedule of Sites 167 8 Proposed Development Sites in Swinton and Kilnhurst 169 8.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 169 8.2 Settlement Profile 170 8.3 Location Map of Sites 171 8.4 Schedule of Sites 173 9 Proposed Development Sites in Catcliffe, Orgreave, Treeton and Waverley 174 9.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 174 9.2 Settlement Profile 175 9.3 Location Map of Sites 176 9.4 Schedule of Sites 178 10 Proposed Development Sites in Thurcroft 179 10.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 179 10.2 Settlement Profile 179 10.3 Location Map of Sites 180
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 10.4 Schedule of Sites 183 11 Proposed Development Sites in Non-Green Belt Villages : Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts and Laughton-en-le-Morthern 184 11.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 184 11.2 Settlement Profiles 185 11.3 Location Map of Sites 187 11.4 Schedule of Sites 195 12 Methodology: Identification of Site Allocations 197 13 Glossary 216
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 1 Introduction
1.1 Rotherham's Local Plan
1.1 Rotherham’s Local Plan will guide future development in the Borough until 2028. It will progressively replace Rotherham's existing Unitary Development Plan (UDP).
1.2 The Council is preparing two key parts that form the basis of its Local Plan these are the Core Strategy and this, the Sites and Policies document.
Core Strategy
1.3 The Core Strategy sets the vision, objectives and strategic policies for the Borough up to 2028. The Core Strategy sets out, in broad terms, where new homes and jobs should be provided in the Borough. In doing so it sets targets for new housing and employment land for each of the Borough's settlements. The Council will submit its Core Strategy to government in June 2013. It will then be subject to examination in public by an independent planning inspector appointed by government.
1.4 The target for any given settlement depends on its position in the Core Strategy's 'settlement hierarchy'. This position is influenced by, amongst other factors, its relative size, role, availability of services and access to public transport and employment.
1.5 All other Local Plan documents must conform with the Core Strategy.
Sites and Policies Document
1.6 The role of the Sites and Policies document is to identify specific sites - the site allocations for each settlement to meet the Core Strategy targets, for new housing and employment land. In doing so, it will define the precise policy boundary for Rotherham's Green Belt. Chapter 6 includes draft development management policies that will guide determination of planning applications and implementation of the site allocations. These decisions will be informed by a series of environmental designations, such as local nature conservation sites.
1.7 The Council is also promoting changes to current Unitary Development Plan residential and employment allocations; specifically at Greenlands Plantation at Maltby known as the Muddies, (site reference LDF0276) where it is proposed to change the residential allocation to an environmental or Urban Greenspace designation to reflect the value of the site for Great Crested Newts. It is hoped that if this approach to its proposed allocation is successful, in the future consideration will be given to designating the site as a Local Nature Reserve. The Council is also seeking to change the residential allocation of a site at Keeton Hall Road, Kiveton Park (site reference LDF0469) from a residential allocation to an environmental designation to reflect its Local Wildlife Site status.
1.8 The Council is promoting a change in the residential allocation of land at Thorpe Hesley to an environmental designation or Urban Greenspace. In the future consideration will be given to including this land at Thorpe Hesley: site references LDF0542, LDF0776, LDF0517 within the Green Belt. Whilst these proposals are not included on the allocations maps, in the appendices to this Document, they are included on the draft Policies Map that has been prepared to accompany the Sites and Policies Document - available to down load from the Local Plan web pages.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 5 1
1.9 Finally the Council is also seeking to change the current employment designation at Centenary Riverside Nature Park to an environmental or Urban Greenspace designation to reflect its recent development as a wetlands nature park and to assist in providing a flood alleviation scheme designed to assist in the protection of Rotherham Town Centre from any potential future flooding event.
1.10 This consultation is seeking your views on:
the proposed site allocations mainly for new homes and jobs at this stage of consultation. Sites for retail and other uses and changes that are required to the land use designations in the Unitary Development Plan will be consulted on in due course. (Sites are shown by settlement groupings in the Appendices); the proposed environmental designations used to influence planning decisions (see Chapter 4); and the draft development management policies (see Chapter 6). 1.2 Site Allocations for New Development
1.11 As already noted this stage of the Sites and Policies document invites comments on sites identified for new housing and employment development. There are also some sites that have been identified for open space.
1.12 The Council in preparing this document has undertaken a thorough Borough-wide survey of all possible site allocations. This has included:
an invitation for the submission of potential sites to landowners and other interested parties (a "call for sites"); a thorough Employment Land Review (including all existing, former and potentially future industrial and employment areas and other brownfield sites); a Study, in partnership with the house building industry, called the ‘Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment’, to identify housing sites which have been market tested for their likelihood of being developed; and a Borough-wide survey and sustainability appraisal of all potential sites.
Core Strategy Broad Locations for Growth
1.13 Policy CS1 of the Core Strategy identifies two broad locations for growth at Bassingthorpe Farm and Dinnington East. Planning permission has also been granted for a new community at Waverley near to Catcliffe and Orgreave. Significant growth is proposed both at Bassingthorpe Farm and Waverley. These areas are essential to delivering the Borough's strategy for new development. They are essential to meeting local housing needs. It is considered that Rotherham and Dinnington town centres provide a level of social and community infrastructure and a range of jobs and local employment opportunities that will support future growth in these communities. The new community at Waverley is adjacent to a strategic regeneration area that will provide significant and high quality employment opportunities and it will meet its own social and community infrastructure requirements as evidenced by the recent grant of planning permission.
6 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 1.3 Development Management Policies
1.14 The current document also invites comments on the detailed development management policies. These will add detail to the Core Strategy strategic policies and they will guide determination of individual planning applications and facilitate implementation of site allocations.
1.15 Comments were previously sought on possible site allocations during consultation on the Sites and Policies Issues and Options Draft 2011, and sought suggestions for potential development management policies. 1.4 Designations
1.16 We are also seeking views on a range of designations. These seek to safeguard particular environmental interests including wildlife, geology, conservation areas and green infrastructure.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7 2
2 Where are we now?
2.1 This Sites and Policies document is based upon work undertaken since 2005 to prepare Rotherham’s Local Plan. Information relating to these past stages can be downloaded from Local Plan documents.
2.2 In the future the Council will consult on a further draft, the Publication version of the Sites and Policies Document. This next stage of consultation will take into account the views of all stakeholders including members of the public, environmental interests, land owners and potential developers, and key government agencies: English Heritage, Natural England and the Environment Agency. The results from this current stage of consultation will lead to refinements to current policy wording and may lead to changes in the selection of the sites for potential future development. 2.1 Rotherham's Local Plan: Previous Stages of Preparation
2.3 November 2005
Core Strategy objectives agreed following engagement with stakeholders and interested parties.
2.4 February 2006
Workshop held to discuss emerging Core Strategy ‘spatial options’ for the Borough.
2.5 15 May to 16 June 2006
We consulted on four Core Strategy ‘spatial options’ for Rotherham via an online questionnaire and workshops. Results given in subsequent Feedback Reports (July 2006).
2.6 5 February to 23 March 2007
Major consultation on the Core Strategy Preferred Options document (Jan 2007) and its accompanying Sustainability Appraisal report.
2.7 May 2007 (and November 2010)
An Employment Land Review was published following consultation – updated in 2010.
2.8 September 2007
Feedback Reports published on the consultation into the Core Strategy Preferred Options document.
2.9 January 2007 to November 2008
We invited suggestions for site allocations.
2.10 23 November 2007
Workshop held with interested parties to discuss and agree how we would undertake surveys to identify possible site allocations.
8 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 2.11 April to September 2008
Borough wide survey to identify possible site allocations and to undertake a review of the boundaries and extent of the Green Belt.
2.12 May to August 2009
Major consultation on the Core Strategy Revised Options including the release of possible site allocations and major urban extensions into Green Belt.
2.13 December 2009 and March 2010
Interim and Final Feedback Reports on the consultation into the Core Strategy Revised Options published.
2.14 July to September 2011
Major consultation on the Draft Core Strategy June 2011 and Sites and Policies Issues and Options June 2011 including initial indication of 'preferred' sites for development.
2.15 January 2012
Feedback Report on the consultation into the Draft Core Strategy and Sites and Policies Issues and Options documents published.
2.16 June to August 2012
Consultation on Publication Core Strategy June 2012
2.17 January to February 2013
Core Strategy Focused Changes January 2013, consultation on minor changes to the Publication Core Strategy prior to submission.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 9 3
3 How have we Identified Site Allocations?
3.1 The methodology or way in which we have identified the possible site allocations in the Borough’s settlements is briefly summarised below and set out in detail in Appendix 12. (This methodology has been independently appraised as discussed in the Appendix).
Draft Survey Criteria
3.2 In 2007 work began to identify the potential capacity and opportunities for new development in the Borough. A set of draft survey criteria was prepared based upon an analysis of the Sustainability Appraisal Objectives given in Rotherham’s LDF Sustainability Appraisal General Scoping Report (March 2006). This aimed to ensure the balanced consideration of all three (social, economic and environmental) aspects of sustainability.
Thurcroft Pilot Study
3.3 The draft survey criteria were used to undertake a pilot survey (undertaken in Thurcroft in April 2007). A revised version was consulted on via a methodology workshop in November 2007. This workshop was attended by more than 60 people from a range of Council service areas and external organisations and interests.
Site Allocations
3.4 The original site survey work that took place during 2007-2008 has been updated to inform preparation of this Sites and Policies document.
Site Surveys and Database
3.5 The site survey criteria were captured in a Site Survey Form with accompanying completion instructions. A Site Allocations Database was developed to record and analyse the subsequent survey work. The outcome is a database of sites with a clear recommendation regarding any potential future land use allocation or designation or its retention in its current use. Refreshed site survey sheets will be available to download from the Local Plan web pages during the consultation.
Sources of Potential Site Allocations
3.6 Representations received as part of the preparation of the Unitary Development Plan during the 1990s and commencement of its subsequent review in the early 2000s yielded a long standing source of sites for consideration as Site Allocations. As part of preparation of the Local Plan, between January 2007 and November 2008, the Council invited expressions of interest from people who own land in Rotherham that they consider might be suitable for future development. This also included dialogue with the Council's own Asset Management Team.
3.7 Further sources of potential site allocations included technical studies undertaken by the Council, including the Urban Potential Study (2004), Employment Land Review (2007, updated 2010) and those Masterplans developed as part of the Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder programme. Council officers also suggested areas for investigation.
Green Belt Review
10 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 3.8 The housing and employment targets for Rotherham determined in the Core Strategy requires the Council to identify potential allocation sites within and outside of the main urban areas. In Rotherham this has entailed looking at the release of land that currently has a Green Belt designation (previously designated in the Unitary Development Plan). Further explanation of this is provided in the Green Belt Review Paper (2011).
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
3.9 Rotherham's Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) has revealed several additional sites. The SHLAA is a detailed process involving the house building industry which seeks to identify sites that are suitable, available and achievable for allocation in the Sites and Policies Document. The SHLAA provides key evidence to demonstrate that there is enough land to support the housing growth targets set out in the Core Strategy.
Gypsy and Traveller Sites
3.10 A small number of potential Gypsy and Traveller sites have previously been identified during the survey work. However, a more comprehensive exercise may still be required to identify possible suitable sites to meet the needs of Gypsies and Travellers. Revised national policy guidance for Gypsy and Traveller sites has also been prepared.
Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham Joint Waste Plan
3.11 The Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham Councils’ adopted Joint Waste Plan is a separate Development Plan Document that provides policies and proposed sites for waste management development.
3.12 The sites in Rotherham to be designated for major waste management facilities are:
a site at Bolton Rd, Manvers, Wath-upon Dearne; and a site within the Aldwarke (Tata plc) Steelworks Complex at Aldwarke Lane, Parkgate.
3.13 The Joint Waste Plan also proposes to safeguard the following existing waste management and landfill sites:
Sheffield Road Templeborough, Rotherham (treatment and recycling plant). South Yorkshire Navigation, Eastwood, Rotherham (British Waterways dredging site). Rotherham Road, Beighton, Rotherham (Sheffield City Council recycling). Harrycroft Quarry, near South Anston, Rotherham (landfill site). Kingsforth Lane, Thurcroft, Rotherham (landfill site).
3.14 Full details of the sites are available in the adopted Joint Waste Plan (2012).
Safeguarded Land
3.15 The Council has also identified safeguarded land. This is land that is removed from the Green Belt and set aside as a reserve to be considered for the next Local Plan after 2028. The purpose of
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 11 3
Safeguarded Land is to ensure that having reviewed the Green Belt boundary as part of this Local Plan, we do not have to do so again before the end of the Plan period or immediately after.
3.16 One of the aspects of the Green Belt is its permanence and therefore the Green Belt boundary is drawn up to last longer than a 15 year plan period. The National Planning Policy Framework sets out the requirement to identify Safeguarded Land and demonstrate its permanence.
3.17 During this Plan period 2013-2028 the land set aside as Safeguarded Land is not allocated for development nor is it proposed to release it. The only way it could be released for development is where house building rates have risen dramatically and the supply of allocated sites has diminished earlier than expected. Even if this were the case, there would still be a need to carry out a review of the Local Plan including public consultation and an examination in public to allocate new sites for development.
3.18 Core Strategy Policy CS5: Safeguarded Land sets out the policy approach to this important issue. Safeguarded Land will be identified, in areas between the Green Belt and Settlements, in the Sites and Policies Document to meet possible longer term development needs equivalent to 5 years beyond the current Core Strategy Plan period. Safeguarded land will be removed from the Green Belt but not allocated for development. The principles of protection enshrined in national Green Belt policy will apply to Safeguarded Land during the current Plan period.
12 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 4 Integrated Impact Assessment
4.1 The Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) sets out the overall approach in terms of how the sustainability appraisal assessment was undertaken of both policies and site allocation options and alternatives. Some of the sites considered by the Council were filtered out at Stage 1 of the Site Selection Assessment. This list of sites is included within the IIA.
4.2 The IIA describes the process which led to the identification of potential sites for allocation and summarises the likely significant effects as identified via the Stage 2 assessment under the site selection methodology. This methodology is included at Appendix 12. The full scoring summary sheets are included within an appendix to the IIA. All of the Stage 2 sites were considered to be reasonable alternatives for the purposes of the SEA regulations.
4.3 Stage 2 of the site selection assessment considered the remaining sites in terms of more detailed site specific sustainability factors and potential constraints to development. This approach complies with SA/SEA requirements.
4.4 The sites assessed at Stage 2 were considered further by the IIA to identify if any reasonable alternatives would result from the potential for combined effects from groups of individuals sites. The IIA provides a step-by-step breakdown of how the "in combination" alternatives were identified relative to environmental and/or socio-economic issues.
4.5 The results of the assessment have been fed into Stage 3 of the site selection methodology. The IIA describes the reasons for choosing the allocations and safeguarded land, in light of the environmental effects identified. This Stage compared sites to prioritise those sites that were the most sustainable for development and best meet the strategic objectives for each settlement grouping. The summary sheets for the Stage 3 assessment under the site selection methodology are included within an appendix to the IIA.
4.6 Stage 3 looked at the potential impact on the Green Belt, the type of urban extension to settlements, deliverability and other known physical constraints, including the proposed High Speed 2 (HS2) the UK's proposed high speed rail network to the north of England and Scotland. The Sustainability Appraisal cumulative effects of development were also considered and scored here.
4.7 The appendices to the IIA in effect provide a summary of the decisions taken in selecting the development allocations.
4.8 The IIA Report considers the theoretical links between the policies and significant issues / environmental problems, and analyses potential risks and opportunities. Policies to mitigate identified effects will be prepared to minimise these effects.
4.9 The IIA also assessed the likely significant effects of the Sites & Policies document as a whole – including the combination of allocations and policies. Any residual risks which remain are identified within the IIA and further mitigation recommended as appropriate to reduce risk or enhance opportunities. A suggested monitoring framework is proposed to ensure that early remedial action can be taken.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13 4
4.10 The IIA and accompanying appendices are available to download from the Local Plan web pages.
4.11 A summary of the process that has enabled us to identify site allocations and safeguarded land is included at Appendix 12.
14 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 5 Designations
5.1 It is important that planning decisions on whether to allocate land for development in this Sites and Policies document, or whether to grant planning permission generally, take full account of environmental interests. For this reason we would like your views on the designations discussed in this section, that have been identified by the Council in its preparatory work for the Core Strategy and Sites and Policies documents.
5.2 Other constraints do exist, such as Flood Risk Zones and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). However, these are not being consulted upon because they are identified by other organisations and bodies and can not be directly altered by the Local Plan. 5.1 Local Wildlife Sites
5.3 Local Wildlife Sites are sites of important local nature conservation interest. A 'Local Wildlife Site System' is replacing the local natural history element of the 'Known Interests Outside Protected Sites' identified in Rotherham's UDP Policy ENV2.2. The Local Wildlife Site system has been developed to provide a more scientific and robust system for the identification and protection of areas important for wildlife. This system is in compliance with new legislation, planning policy and national best practice. The system has a written framework of operation and detailed site selection guidelines produced by independent consultants and uses ecological records held within Rotherham's Biological Records Centre. The Local Wildlife Sites Panel (a panel of independent experts) oversees the operation of the system. 5.2 Regionally Important Geological Sites
5.4 Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS) are sites of important local geological conservation interest. Although not shown in the Unitary Development Plan (UDP), they were first introduced into Rotherham's planning system in November 1999. These sites were re-surveyed in 2010 under guidance by a local panel of experts, the Rotherham Local Geological Sites Panel. It is anticipated the RIGS and in the future a Local Geological Sites System (incorporating RIGS and mirroring and integrated with the Local Wildlife Site System) will replace the geological element of the 'Known Interests outside Protected Sites' which were designated in Rotherham's UDP (Policy ENV2.2). 5.3 Conservation Areas
5.5 A Conservation Area is an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character of which is desirable to preserve or enhance. They are often, but not exclusively, centred on listed buildings. However, it is the character of the area, including its landscape qualities, rather than the presence of individual buildings, which justifies designation as a Conservation Area.
5.6 Under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, every Local Planning Authority has a duty to consider designating Conservation Areas. Within Rotherham Borough there are currently 28. The majority were designated by Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council following local government reorganisation in 1974.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 15 5
5.7 Policy ENV2.10 of the Unitary Development Plan identified certain settlements within the Borough for potential designation as new Conservation Areas. Character Appraisals have now been carried out on all the areas identified. These appraisals assess the area’s special historic, archaeological and architectural interest through mapping, photography and analysis of the area’s development.
5.8 As a result of these appraisals it was decided to proceed with the possible designation of 11 new Conservation Areas; 2 of which, Letwell and Ulley, have now been designated. 5.4 Strategic Green Infrastructure Assets
5.9 Green infrastructure is defined by the National Planning Policy Framework to be a network of multi-functional green space, urban and rural, which is capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities.
5.10 Rotherham Core Strategy, section 5.6.3 lists a range of typical green infrastructure assets. Green infrastructure is both urban and rural and will permeate from the core of the built environment out to rural areas. Green infrastructure operates at a range of scales from individual street trees (neighbourhood and local level), to designated and non designated landscapes (at the regional level and beyond).
5.11 Green Infrastructure functions in many different ways and provides multiple benefits for local communities including: promoting improved health and well being of people, mitigating climate change such as flood alleviation and urban cooling, providing benefits to the local economy through a high quality environment to help attract further economic investment and benefits to biodiversity through the strengthening of ecological networks.
5.12 Green infrastructure provides an opportunity to deliver and coordinate future growth and environmental improvements, this can encourage external investment into the Borough, promote access to the countryside and recreation as well as protect and enhance settlement character and quality.
Yorkshire & Humber Green Infrastructure Mapping Project (2010)
5.13 Natural England, the Government's advisor on the natural environment, led work to identify Rotherham's strategic green infrastructure corridors: the Yorkshire and Humber Green Infrastructure Mapping Project. Detailed descriptions of each corridor have been prepared that explain their main features, component assets, functions and key opportunities. Two local green infrastructure corridors (namely at Anston Brook & Sandbeck) are also identified but no formal description is provided in this strategic work to recognise their local significance. The purpose of the initial green infrastructure mapping project was to identify, conserve, extend, enhance, manage and maintain the subregional and regional corridor assets, as the key constituent components of the strategic green infrastructure network.
South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
5.14 Further work on identifying Green Infrastructure has subsequently been undertaken in South Yorkshire with the South Yorkshire Forest Partnership leading in this work.
16 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 5.15 Part 1 of the South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy has identified a number of ambitious, high-level goals, supported by proposals for their delivery. It includes a Masterplan highlighting priority areas for improvement. Part 2 of this document sets out a five-year programme for delivery of projects that will be revised and updated on a rolling basis. A draft delivery plan has been prepared and identifies key projects in Rotherham and the wider South Yorkshire.
Local Green Infrastructure Strategies
5.16 The Natural England mapping project and the South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy provides the basis for the preparation of a Rotherham Green Infrastructure Strategy in the future. A local Green Infrastructure Strategy would set Rotherham's priorities. Areas of major new development are anticipated as a priority for the future strategy.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 17 6
6 Policies Map
6.1 As part of the Local Plan process the NPPF requires all local authorities to produce a Policies Map (formerly called a Proposals Map) showing a variety of land use designations and the location of allocated development sites for housing, employment and other uses. This will eventually replace the current Unitary Development Plan adopted Proposals Map.
6.2 A draft Policies Map has now been produced showing a number of land use designations / areas (e.g. Green Belt, residential, business use, etc) and known environmental designations (e.g. local wildlife sites, regionally important geological sites, etc) and highlights those sites currently preferred by the Council to be allocated for development and/or to be identified as Safeguarded Land.
6.3 Due to the complex nature of this map it cannot clearly be shown within this document but can be accessed and viewed through our Local Plan pages.
18 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7 Draft Development Management Policies
7.1 The Publication Core Strategy is proposing a total of 33 “Strategic Policies” arranged under seven broad themes of:
Delivering development in sustainable locations; Creating mixed and attractive places to live; Supporting a dynamic economy; Movement and accessibility; Managing the natural and historic environment; Creating safe and sustainable communities; and Infrastructure.
7.2 These will be used to achieve the Core Strategy’s objectives and its role in establishing the principles for where and how new development will occur in Rotherham.
7.3 The Core Strategy policies do not set detailed “development management” policies or establish how individual site allocations may be implemented. This is delegated to this, the Sites and Policies document. Further detailed guidance may be prepared separately as Supplementary Planning Documents.
7.4 The Council is now seeking views on the detailed Development Management policies which follow. They are set out under the seven broad themes above to ensure consistency with the Core Strategy. The policies should be considered having regard to the following principles:
All policies should be read together. This means that individual Development Management policies need to be considered together and proposals will need to satisfy the requirements of all relevant policies. The policies must be read in conjunction with the policies set out in the Publication Core Strategy (2012) and the proposed amendments set out in the Core Strategy Focused Changes document (2013), and national planning policy. These policies provide additional detail to the policies set out at a national level or within the Core Strategy. As such all policies must be considered together and proposals will need to satisfy the requirements of all relevant policies.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 19 7
7.1 Delivering development in sustainable locations
Policy SP 1
Rural Workers Dwellings in the Green Belt
New houses in the Green Belt require special justification for planning permission to be granted and should relate to the essential need for a rural worker to live permanently at or near to their place of work. The applicant will be required to establish a need for a new dwelling and demonstrate this in support of the planning application.
Where a permanent house is proposed to be built high standards of design appropriate to the setting of the proposal are required and the impact of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt is to be minimised. In considering a planning application for new development regard will be had to the size, scale, position, screening, enclosures, lighting and design of the proposals to ensure they minimise the impact of the development on the openness of the Green Belt. Where possible, new dwellings should be well-related to existing farm buildings or other dwellings and should be of a size commensurate with the established functional requirement.
Explanation
7.5 Where the need to provide accommodation for rural workers has been accepted as providing the justification then it will be necessary to ensure that dwellings are kept available for meeting this need for as long as it exists and the Council will apply an appropriate occupancy condition or require a S106 planning agreement if this is more appropriate, to ensure the long term future of the dwelling to meet the needs of rural workers. Further guidance to assist the applicant applying for a rural worker's dwelling is provided in the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Guidance. Removal of the occupancy condition will require the applicant to show that the worker no longer needs to live close to the relevant activity and to state why this is the case, and to demonstrate that there is no demand for a rural worker's home in the area. Evidence will be required to demonstrate that the home has been put up for sale with a land agent at a price that reflects the occupancy condition attached to the property for at least 12 months and that there has been no reasonable offer.
7.6 The Council will expect the applicant to demonstrate the recent pattern of use of the land and buildings and whether any dwellings, or building suitable for conversion have recently been sold separately from the farmland. Such a sale could constitute evidence of lack of need for a new dwelling.
7.7 The Council expects a high standard of design that minimise the impact of any new development on the openness and character of the Green Belt. This policy will ensure that applicants building a permanent home to house a rural worker have due regard to the impact new development will have on the openness of the Green Belt.
20 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 2
Extensions to Buildings in the Green Belt
In the Green Belt the extension or alteration of an existing building may be appropriate provided that it does not result in disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building. Consideration will be given to the size, scale, position, screening, enclosures, lighting and design of any such extensions or alterations to existing buildings, to ensure that proposals reflect the architectural style of the original building and / or the vernacular styles in the locality.
Explanation
7.8 Proposals will be assessed in the light of their impact on the Green Belt. The Council issues guidance to assist applicants in submitting their planning applications and will have regard to to the degree to which proposals are compatible with the guidance issued. The Council considers that an increase in excess of 33% in the volume of the original building would make the proposals disproportionate and therefore inappropriate development in the Green Belt and very special circumstances would need to be demonstrated. Further guidance is provided in the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Guidance.
Policy SP 3
Alternative Uses for Buildings within the Green Belt
The change of use or conversion of a building in the Green Belt is acceptable in principle providing that the proposals preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with the purposes of including land within the Green Belt. All proposals will require careful assessment as to the impact and appropriateness of such changes; to ensure that the historic, architectural, natural history or landscape value of the building and its setting will not be detrimentally affected; and that major rebuilding or extension that would affect the character of the building or its setting is not involved. Prior to any conversion of a building it should be demonstrated that the building is of permanent and substantial construction. The Council publishes guidance outlining detailed criteria to enable successful building conversions within the Green Belt. Alternative uses will need to meet the requirements of other policies, appropriate to the use proposed, within the Local Plan.
Explanation
7.9 Conversions to other uses of buildings in the Green Belt offer an opportunity to retain assets and character in the countryside. Many buildings are of significant value both in relation to landscape character and natural history. There is a need to protect the landscape character of the countryside and any intrinsic character that the building itself derives from style, layout, materials, detailing and setting. Re-use or adaption of buildings can help to reduce demands for new buildings in the countryside, can encourage new enterprises and can provide jobs in rural areas. Applications for
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 21 7 conversions need to be carefully assessed to ensure that essential features are retained and the details of the conversion are in keeping with the surroundings. Conversion of a listed vernacular building will be strongly resisted unless the proposals can be proven to preserve the buildings' special interest. The Council will need to be assured that the building can withstand conversion without extensive repairs and new build that threaten the vernacular character of the building. The applicants should ensure that the new use is sympathetic to the rural character. The creation of a residential curtilage around newly converted buildings can sometimes have a harmful effect on the openness of the Green Belt, proposals should therefore demonstrate that change of use of a rural building to residential use does not impact on the openness of the Green Belt. The Council may remove permitted development rights to ensure that harm to the Green Belt is minimised.
7.10 An application for building conversion will require an assessment of the historical development of the site, a full measured survey and a structural survey including a condition survey. The Council has prepared further guidance to assist and advise applicants in preparing their proposals, set out in the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Guidance.
7.11 The re-use of an existing building for other purposes should not result in a significantly greater effect than the present use on the openness of the Green Belt. Diversification of the land will not justify activities that harm the openness of the Green Belt.
Policy SP 4
Replacement Buildings in the Green Belt
The replacement of buildings within the the Green Belt is not inappropriate provided that the new building is in the same use and not materially larger than the one it replaces. Replacement buildings must not be significantly more visible than the existing building or buildings. A new permanent structure will not be allowed to replace a temporary building / structure. Proposals for replacement buildings should not detrimentally affect the character or openness of the Green Belt and all proposals will require careful assessment as to the impact and appropriateness of the development; consideration will be given to the size, scale, position, screening, enclosures, lighting and design of replacement buildings, to ensure that proposals reflect the vernacular styles in the locality.
Explanation
7.12 This policy reflects guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework and is intended to enable the continued protection of the openness and character of the Green Belt. The Council publishes guidance outlining detailed criteria to enable the successful replacement of buildings within the Green Belt in the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Guidance. This indicates that the Council considers that an increase in excess of 10% in the volume of the existing building would make the proposals materially larger and therefore inappropriate development in the Green Belt and very special circumstances would need to be demonstrated.
22 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 5
Infilling Development within the Green Belt
In Green Belt villages limited residential infilling, that can demonstrate that it will not erode the character of the area, may be acceptable. Infilling means the filling of a small gap in an otherwise built up frontage. Any development that does take place should not detract from the character and appearance of such villages.
7.13 The Council defines a small gap as a gap which fronts onto a highway and has a width less than 20 metres between the existing buildings. Any proposals for such development should be discussed with the Local Planning Authority before the submission of a planning application.
7.14 Further guidance is set out in the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Guidance, including identifying the villages to which this policy applies. Core Strategy Policy CS7 also sets out the circumstances in which affordable housing within Green Belt villages may be acceptable.
Policy SP 6
Previously Developed Sites within the Green Belt
In instances where existing activities are located within the Green Belt, proposals for limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed sites, whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), may be considered acceptable, provided that they would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it, than the existing development. All proposals will require careful assessment and agreement prior to their submission, as to the impact and appropriateness of such changes.
7.15 Future development proposals for these sites will be carefully scrutinised to ensure that there will be no greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it than the existing development. Any proposals for partial redevelopment should be put forward in the context of comprehensive, long-term plans for the site as a whole. For the purposes of this policy, infill will be taken as development between existing permanent buildings. One example is Aven Industrial Park, east of Maltby, which is within the Green Belt. Over previous years the Council has considered it appropriate to approve rationalisation and improvement proposals for this site and this approach will also be pursued with other previously developed sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 23 7
Policy SP 7
Proposals for Outdoor Sport, Outdoor Recreation and Cemeteries in the Green Belt.
Provision of appropriate facilities for outdoor sport, outdoor recreation and cemeteries, will be acceptable as long as they preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with the purposes of including land within it providing that:
a. they would not give rise to undue disturbance caused by excessive noise or the attraction of large numbers of people or excessive traffic, b. they are sited and designed so as to avoid any adverse impact on identified landscape character, heritage, nature conservation or agricultural interests, and c. they can satisfy other relevant policies of the Plan and National Guidance.
7.16 Many outdoor sport and recreational activities are compatible with protecting the openness of the Green Belt. However, certain sporting activities are difficult to locate in the countryside, because of noise or other effects (e.g. motor sport, clay-pigeon shooting and war-games). Such activities can cause noise and traffic disturbance and conflict with nature conservation interests. The environmental impact of the proposed activity needs careful consideration and proposals for development of facilities should demonstrate that they will preserve the openness of the Green Belt. Consideration will be given to the impact on other land-uses in the locality, especially agriculture and forestry, and on areas of heritage, nature conservation or landscape value. In assessing impact, the level and type of vehicular, cycle and pedestrian traffic likely to be generated will be taken into account.
7.17 Proposals for new buildings to accommodate ancillary facilities in support of outdoor sport and recreation should not detrimentally affect the character or openness of the Green Belt. All proposals will require careful assessment as to the impact and appropriateness of the development; consideration will be given to the size, scale, position, screening, enclosures, lighting and sustainable design and construction of new buildings. In general, it will be important that outdoor elements predominate in any scheme and, where ancillary indoor elements are proposed, they should respect the existing landscape in their scale and prominence. Where ancillary buildings are necessary, they should wherever possible relate to an existing grouping of buildings, rather than introduce new, built development into an open landscape.
24 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.2 Creating mixed and attractive places to live
Policy SP 8
Housing Delivery
1 Release of Housing Allocations
Sites allocated for housing will be released for development in two phases:
a. Sites in phase one will be released at any point during the plan period; b. Sites in phase two will only be released if:
i. All phase 1 sites have been released or are not deliverable or developable; Or ii. Phase 2 sites need to be released to ensure that the five year supply of deliverable sites is maintained or to maintain delivery as required by the housing trajectory.
2 Five Year Housing Supply
The Council is committed to assessing the five year supply against the five year requirement plus 20% until it can be demonstrated that the Council is consistently meeting its housing requirement. The Council shall consider that it is consistently meeting its housing requirement if:
a. The Council can demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable sites plus 20%: and b. In the same year the Council has equalled or exceeded its annual target for net additional dwellings per annum for three consecutive years.
From the following year onwards the Council will assess the five year supply against the five year target plus 5%, unless the council fails to reach its target for net additional dwellings for three consecutive years.
Explanation
7.18 Core Strategy Policy CS6 sets out our approach to the release of allocated housing land. Policy SP8 sets out the how the Council will ensure that an adequate supply of housing land is maintained and, as far as is possible, ensure that the most sustainable sites are delivered.
7.19 Where local planning authorities have consistently failed to meet housing targets, National Planning Policy requires the addition of a 20% buffer to the five year target against which Local Planning Authorities compare there supply of deliverable sites. It follows, therefore that when a local planning authority is meeting its housing targets they can revert to the standard 5% buffer required by the NPPF and this policy sets out the conditions under which this buffer will no longer be applied. Consideration shall be given in the future regarding the phase assigned to each allocated housing site.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 25 7
Delivery
7.20 Where a site has planning permission it will be placed in phase 1. All other sites will be assessed in terms of their overall sustainability using evidence gathered as part of the site selection process. Additionally deliverability issues have also been taken into account. The more sustainable and deliverable sites have been assigned to phase 1. Other sites have been assigned to phase 2.
7.21 The rate of delivery of housing will be monitored to ensure that a continuous five year, plus 20%, supply of deliverable housing land is maintained. In the event that monitoring identifies a less than five year, plus 20%, supply of deliverable housing land priority will be given to bringing forward allocated sites from phase 2 in order to rectify the shortfall.
7.22 The five year target is calculated by taking five times the annual target of 850 net additional dwellings per annum plus a five year share of the remaining shortfall against the target since 2008; with any shortfall being distributed evenly through the remaining years of the plan period.
Policy SP 9
Development in Housing Areas
Residential areas, whether existing or undeveloped housing allocations shall be retained primarily for residential uses. All residential uses shall be considered appropriate in these areas and will be considered in light of all relevant planning policies.
Non residential uses will be considered in light of the need to maintain the housing land supply and normally only permitted where they:
a. Are ancillary to the residential nature and function of the area; and b. Are no larger than is required to meet the needs of local residents; and c. Will not have an unacceptable impact on the residential amenity of the area; and d. Satisfy the requirements all other relevant planning policies.
Explanation
7.23 Existing residential areas need to be protected to maintain their amenity and character and to ensure that these areas continue to meet ongoing housing needs. Allocated housing sites need to be protected to ensure that non-residential uses compromise the supply of land for new housing.
7.24 Certain non-residential uses will be allowed in residential areas where they are ancillary and complementary to the main residential use. Such uses could include proposals for home-working, convenience shops serving the local area only, social and community facilities, public houses, amenity and local recreational open space. Although residential areas are generally seen to be suitable locations for Class B1 employment uses, development proposals within this Use Class will be resisted if the scale of the building and the intensity of use, particularly traffic movements, are detrimental to the appearance and character of the residential area.
26 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 10
Development on Residential Gardens
Proposals involving development on a garden or group of gardens, including infill of corner plots, will only be permitted where:
a. a comprehensive scheme can be achieved; and b. the proposal does not seriously affect the amenity of existing properties by overlooking, loss of privacy, or obtrusiveness; and c. development would not result in harm to the character of the area, taking account of whether:
i. the site on its own or in conjunction with surrounding gardens makes a positive contribution to the pattern of development and the character of the area; ii. the general pattern and form of development in the area is maintained; iii. proposed plot sizes and spacings between buildings reflect that predominating in the surrounding area; iv. any access road into the proposed development would cause loss of amenity issues for existing residents or create an undue disruption to the character and appearance of an existing road frontage.
Explanation
7.25 Small housing sites within residential areas can make an important contribution to the borough’s housing provision. However it has been recognised for many years that residential development on back land areas presents problems in terms of residential amenity and convenience of access.
7.26 Gardens are an important part of the character of housing areas and contribute towards the quality of life enjoyed by residents. They provide a setting for buildings and allow for privacy and amenity to be enjoyed by residents. Careful planning will therefore be required to make developments on garden land acceptable especially if the new buildings are to be fitted successfully into existing residential areas.
7.27 This Policy sets out the circumstances in which development involving garden sites will be appropriate, and the criteria against which development proposals will be considered. It also applies to proposals to build additional dwellings within corner properties whose back gardens have road frontages.
7.28 The nature of garden sites can mean that they are often in multiple ownerships, which can present issues of land assembly. The Council is keen to ensure that where permission is granted, that schemes are fully implemented and do not lead to problems of overlooking and loss of privacy in existing back gardens which would not occur if the proposal were fully implemented. Developers will therefore be required to demonstrate that a comprehensive scheme can be implemented.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 27 7
7.29 The Council will need to be satisfied that the proposed development would not seriously affect the amenity of existing properties by overlooking, loss of privacy, or obtrusiveness. This will require careful consideration of the type, scale and massing of any proposed development, along with appropriate landscaping. Such considerations will include the distance between properties, the appropriate height for any dwelling given the height of surrounding properties, the location of dwellings within the plot to ensure adequate provision of garden space, the location of habitable rooms with windows and the provision, as appropriate, of screening at sensitive boundaries.
7.30 Development proposals will not be acceptable where they are detrimental to the character of the area. Consideration will be given to the site and its contribution to its surroundings, taking account for example of the house types in the area, the street pattern, grain of development and landscaping. The proposed layout should provide spacings between each of the new dwellings to complement the existing pattern of development in the area.
7.31 Access to any proposed development will be critical. This can often be dependant upon the loss of an existing property on the street frontage in order to form a road access into the site. Consideration will be given to whether the creation of an access road would result in the loss of amenity for existing residents or visually disrupt the character and appearance of an existing street frontage, taking account of the form and rhythm of development, and the presence and pattern of trees in the street scene. Careful consideration will also be given to whether any access road can be provided to adopted standards.
7.32 Given the sensitive issues above the Council will also give consideration to the removal of permitted development rights for extensions, window or door insertion and the conversion of integral garages to living accommodation. (Permitted development rights define the amounts and type of development that do not require express planning permission.)
28 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 11
Gypsy and Traveller Sites
Proposals for Gypsy and Traveller sites will be supported in towns and villages on sites suitable for residential uses. When considering proposals the suitability of sites shall be considered in accordance with the criteria in Core Strategy Policy CS3, with particular consideration given to the following matters:
a. no significant harm to the built or natural heritage including trees, hedgerows, and biodiversity; b. no significant harm to local amenity, infrastructure or agriculture; c. safe and convenient access to the highway network; d. good access to community services by non-car modes; e. no development within areas with a high probability of flooding.
In all cases sites will be expected to meet the following requirements:
a. sufficient space for the planned number of caravans, commercial vehicles, play space amenity blocks and the safe circulation of vehicles; b. the scale of the site should not dominate the nearest settled community c. good existing screening of the site and/or the carrying out of suitable landscaping.
Within the Green Belt there will be a presumption against proposed pitches or yards; very special circumstances will not exist unless the harm, by the reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations.
Explanation
7.33 The criteria presented in this policy have been formulated with regard to "Planning Policy for Traveller Sites" (DCLG, March 2012) which states that criteria based policies should be fair and should facilitate the traditional and nomadic life of travellers while respecting the interests of the settled community. Furthermore, the Council expects that any future Gypsy and Traveller provision will follow the principles of design laid out in “Designing Gypsy and Traveller Sites: Good Practice Guide” (DCLG, 2008), or any future replacement guidance.
Delivery
7.34 This policy shall be applied both when selecting sites for allocation and for proposals on unallocated land.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 29 7
7.3 Supporting a dynamic economy
Policy SP 12
Land Identified for Business Use
Within areas allocated for business use, development proposals falling within Use Class B1 will be permitted. Offices falling within Use Class B1 will only be acceptable where they are ancillary to the main proposed use or the proposals satisfy the requirements of Policy CS12 and other relevant planning policy.
Development proposals within Use Classes B2 and B8 will not be acceptable. Other uses will be considered on their merits in line with Policy SP14.
Explanation
7.35 Within sites allocated for business use on the Policies Map development will be restricted to uses falling within the B1 business use class, which comprises industry, research and development and office uses (excluding those falling within class A2) which can be carried out in a residential area.
7.36 Offices are identified in national planning policy as main town centre uses and as such where offices falling within Use Class B1 form the main use of any proposed development they are subject to the sequential approach set out in Core Strategy Policy CS12 and the NPPF. Such office development proposals will only be acceptable where they satisfy the requirements of these policies. However it is also acknowledged that office use can form a key part of business operations. Policy SP12 recognises this, and where it is demonstrably ancillary to the main development office use will be acceptable within sites allocated business or industrial and business use.
7.37 Business use sites are situated within or close to residential areas or close to other environmentally sensitive areas such as the Green Belt or community facilities. We continue to support the allocation of such sites particularly where they can help provide local employment opportunities for residents. However they are not suitable for other industrial or business uses which may compromise the amenity of adjacent land uses or the amenity of businesses.
Policy SP 13
Land Identified for Industrial and Business Uses
Within sites allocated for industrial and business use on the Policies Map development proposals falling within Use Classes B1, B2 and B8 will be permitted. Offices falling within Use Class B1 will only be acceptable where they are ancillary to the main proposed use or the proposals satisfy the requirements of Policy CS12 and other relevant planning policy.
Development proposals within Use Classes C1, C2, C3 and C4 will not be acceptable. Other uses will be considered on their merits in line with Policy SP14.
30 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Explanation
7.38 Sites allocated for industrial and business use are suitable for a wider range of activities. As well as proposals falling within the B1 business use class, uses within Use Class B2 (for general industrial use) and Use Class B8 (for storage and distribution) will be acceptable in principle. B1, B2 and B8 activities can generally co-exist perfectly satisfactorily.
7.39 Offices are identified in national planning policy as main town centre uses and as such where offices falling within Class B1 form the main use of any proposed development they are subject to the sequential approach set out in Core Strategy Policy CS12 and the NPPF. Such office development proposals will only be acceptable where they satisfy the requirements of these policies. However it is also acknowledged that office use can form a key part of business operations. Policy SP13 recognises this, and where it is demonstrably ancillary to the main development office use will be acceptable within sites allocated business or industrial and business use.
7.40 Residential uses within Use Classes C2, C3 and C4 will not be acceptable within industrial and business areas due to the amenity and land use conflicts likely to arise.
Policy SP 14
Other Uses Within Business, and Industrial and Business Areas
Within sites allocated for business, or industrial and business use on the Policies Map, uses other than those identified in Policies SP12 and SP13 will be considered on their merit having regard to other relevant planning policies and:
a. the impact on the character of the area b. compatibility with adjacent existing and proposed land uses and any impact on amenity c. evidence that there are no suitable alternative locations available or likely to become available within a reasonable period of time for the proposed development d. that adequate provision of employment land would remain within the borough and the locality of the site based upon an assessment of existing land supply (including amount, type, quality and use of land) and current and future demand; and e. that there is compelling evidence which clearly illustrates that the site is no longer viable for employment use on the basis that:
i. The site or premises have been marketed to the Council's satisfaction for at least 12 months and included both traditional and web-based marketing, and regular advertisement in local, regional and/or national publications as appropriate; and ii. opportunities to re-let premises have been fully explored; and iii. The premises/site have been marketed at a price which is commensurate with market values (based on evidence from recent and similar transactions and deals) and iv. it has been demonstrated that the terms and conditions set out in the lease are reasonable and attractive to potential businesses, and that no reasonable offer has been refused.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 31 7
Explanation
7.41 Policies SP12 and SP13 set out the uses which will be acceptable and unacceptable within business, and industrial and business use areas. These areas encompass sites allocated for new economic development and sites where business, or industrial business uses are predominant or will be considered acceptable.
7.42 In order to ensure that sufficient suitable employment land remains available whilst allowing flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances, policy SP14 establishes that proposals for alternative uses will be considered on their merits and taking account of a range of factors.
7.43 The impact of the proposed development on the character of the area, and the compatibility with adjacent existing and proposed land uses will be considered, along with any impact on amenity.
7.44 Proposed uses may be acceptable within areas allocated for other uses. Therefore the Council will require evidence that there are no suitable alternative locations available or likely to become available within a reasonable period of time for the proposed development. This should be considered on a borough-wide basis unless compelling evidence can be provided justifying the location of the proposed development within a particular locality.
7.45 The Council also needs to be satisfied that viable employment sites are not lost and that alternative development does not jeopardise the Local Plan’s strategy for meeting the borough’s employment requirements. We will therefore require evidence that adequate provision of employment land would remain within the borough and the locality of the site based upon an assessment of existing land supply (including amount, type, quality and use of land) and current and future demand. This should have regard to the Council’s latest Employment Land Review.
7.46 To ensure that viable employment sites are not lost to alternative uses applicants should provide evidence that the land or property has been advertised on the open market for at least 12 months. The Council expects marketing to have taken place at least four times at roughly equal periods over the year, at a realistic price which reflects its value as employment land or an employment enterprise and that no reasonable offer has been refused.
7.47 The Council will seek evidence that a range of appropriate marketing methods have been employed, that opportunities to re-let premises have been fully explored and that the terms and conditions set out in the lease are reasonable and attractive to potential businesses.
32 Sites and Policies Draft 2013
Policy SP 15
Industrial and Business Development in Relation to Sensitive Areas of Land- use
Where occupied housing or other sensitive land uses are situated within or close to areas allocated for industrial and business use or Mixed Use Areas, all development must have regard to the presence of the sensitive land-use and be designed in such a way that residential amenities or the special characteristics of the sensitive area are not adversely affected. Sensitive land uses should not be located close to industrial and business uses where the environmental needs of residents or other occupiers or users of the proposed development would constrain the neighbouring business or industrial activities.
Explanation
7.48 In some areas, the Local Plan provides for a change in land-use character, with a past predominant land-use being replaced by another. This may, of necessity, be a gradual process where the transition takes place over several years. Policy SP15 ensures that where sensitive land uses are close to areas allocated for industrial and business use or Mixed Use Areas, that amenity considerations are taken into account in any development proposals. Sensitive uses could include, but are not limited, to housing, residential institutions, hotels, hostels, community facilities, certain leisure uses, land allocated as Green Belt, and wildlife, geology and heritage sites.
7.49 In instances where a residential area or other ‘sensitive’ area such as Green Belt or a Heritage Site adjoins an industrial and business area, development of land in close proximity to the ‘sensitive’ area will be restricted to Class B1 use or other uses which do not harm the amenity or character of the area. Wherever possible, the amenity of adjoining areas will be protected from the effects of industrial activity by a requirement in any new development for suitably landscaped and contoured buffer strips and appropriate boundary treatment, including screen walls or fences.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 33 7
Policy SP 16
Waverley Advanced Manufacturing Park
To protect and enhance this regionally important cluster development within the Advanced Manufacturing Park, as shown on the Policies Map, will be restricted to proposals within Classes B1(b) research & development / studios / laboratories / high-tech, B1(c) Light Industry; and B2 general industry (specifically advanced manufacturing / engineering) which can demonstrate that they contribute towards the advanced manufacturing and materials sector. Proposals for B1(a) offices will only be acceptable where they are complementary to the main use of the Advanced Manufacturing Park.
Alternative employment proposals within Classes B1 and B2 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order, 1987 (as amended) will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that:
a. there is no reasonable prospect of the site being developed for advanced manufacturing and materials purposes, and b. development would not compromise the development of other sites within the Advanced Manufacturing Park for uses within the advanced manufacturing and materials sector, and c. there are no other sites suitable for the proposed development which are available or will become available within a reasonable period of time
Explanation
7.50 The Advanced Manufacturing Park (AMP) at Waverley has developed as a regionally important cluster contributing towards Rotherham's economic transformation. It provides land for new jobs within the priority advanced manufacturing and materials sector. Core Strategy Policy CS9 encourages the development of this cluster by supporting proposals for complementary uses. Policy SP16 above makes clear that the Council will support development proposals which can demonstrate that they contribute towards the advanced manufacturing and materials sector. This may include research and development intensive space, suitable for delivering roll out of high technology, research and development and hybrid space, encompassing a mix of industrial space and offices, ideal for modern manufacturers providing ‘manu’-services, and in growth sectors such as low carbon industries and medical technology.
7.51 In helping to maintain and enhance this cluster, the site is not considered suitable for more general employment uses which could be accommodated in other locations. Therefore alternative uses within Use Classes B1 and B2 will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that the site has no reasonable prospect of being developed for advanced manufacturing and materials purposes, and that there are no other suitable sites suitable for the proposed development which are available or will become available within a reasonable period of time. It will also be important to ensure that any alternative development does not compromise the development of other sites within the Advanced Manufacturing Park for the preferred uses identified in Policy SP16.
34 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 17
Tourism and Visitor Developments
All proposals for tourism and visitor developments will be assessed against the capacity of the area to cope with the pressures generated and will be required to demonstrate that:
a. they do not conflict with policies to conserve the landscape, the natural environment and the Borough’s heritage;
b. they have regard to agricultural and other rural land-use interests and the need to conserve the best and most versatile farmland;
c. they make adequate arrangements for the storage of plant, goods and materials;
d. they have regard to the opportunities available for the provision of public transport;
e. conflict with adjoining land-uses with particular regard to pollution, nuisance, health, safety and visual intrusion has been minimised; and
f. proposals comply with all other relevant planning policies.
Explanation
7.52 Core Strategy Policy CS11 identifies the important role that tourism and the visitor economy play in contributing to the diversification of Rotherham's economy and enhancing Rotherham as a visitor location. Whilst proposals for tourism and visitor developments will be strongly encouraged, it is recognised that there will be pressures for development in sensitive locations. It is vital that these developments do not exceed the capacity of the immediate environment to accommodate them. In addition to Policy CS11, Policy SP17 sets out the factors which development proposals will be required demonstrate.
7.53 Proposals should demonstrate that they do not conflict with policies to conserve the landscape, the natural environment and the Borough’s heritage, and that they have regard to agricultural and other rural land-use interests, including the need to conserve the best and most versatile farmland. The design of proposals should ensure that appropriate arrangements are in place for the storage of plant, goods and materials. Compliance with other Local Plan policies will ensure that proposals are suitable in terms of the ability of the highway network to cope with the traffic generated in terms of the number, type and size of vehicles involved, during construction and after occupation, and that they make adequate arrangements for site access, local traffic circulation, parking and servicing.
7.54 Proposals should show that the potential for the provision of public transport to serve the development has been considered. Given the potentially sensitive nature of some locations it will be particularly important that conflict with adjoining land-uses is minimised, especially with regard to pollution, nuisance, health, safety and visual intrusion.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 35 7
Policy SP 18
Development Within Town, District and Local Centres
1 Acceptable uses
Within Town, District and Local shopping centres but outside of Main Shopping Areas, development proposals for the following uses will be acceptable in principle subject to meeting the requirements of other relevant planning policies:
a. A1 shops b. A2 financial and professional services c. A3 restaurants and cafes d. A4 drinking establishments e. A5 hot food takeaways f. B1 offices g. D1 non-residential institutions h. D2 assembly and leisure i. C1 hotels j. Theatres k. Retail warehouse clubs l. Casinos m. Amusement arcades n. Taxi booking offices
2 Residential use
Within Town, District and Local shopping centres, including Main Shopping Areas, proposals for residential use above ground floors will be supported providing that:
a. the development would not compromise the successful operation of the ground floor premises for commercial uses, and b. the amenity of residents would not be negatively affected by surrounding uses
Explanation
7.55 Retail and service centres are much more than a collection of shops. Associated services and outlets providing for visiting members of the public are appropriate and essential; banks, cafes, pubs, estate agents and take-aways are just a few examples, all of which can reinforce pedestrian flows and are preferable to long-term vacancies.
7.56 Core Strategy Policies CS12 and CS13 support Rotherham's retail and service centres as the main locations for retail, leisure and other town centre uses. In line with these policies the borough's town, district and local centres are defined on the Policies Map. Within town and district centres a Main Shopping Area has been defined consisting of Primary Shopping Frontages and where appropriate
36 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Secondary Shopping frontages. These are defined on the Policies Map. Local centres are considered too small to require the identification of such areas.
7.57 Policy SP18 above sets out the uses which will be acceptable in principle within town, district and local centres but outside of Main Shopping Areas. It also recognises the role that housing can play in supporting the vitality and viability of centres by supporting residential proposals within centres above ground floor level. This also recognises the need to support mixed use development within centres, with active uses at ground floor level and other town centre or residential uses on upper floors. Residential uses at upper floor levels will therefore be supported where the development would not compromise the successful operation of the ground floor premises for commercial uses. Whilst acknowledging that residential uses within centres may be subject to levels of noise and activity not experienced in traditional housing areas, the policy seeks to ensure that the amenity of residents would not be negatively affected by surrounding uses; for example through mitigation measures such as sound proofing.
Policy SP 19
Main Shopping Areas
Main shopping areas, defined on the Policies Map and consisting of primary and secondary shopping frontages, are the priority locations for new and existing shopping facilities. New retail development within these areas will be supported. Non-retail uses at ground floor level will only be supported where the requirements of Policies SP20 and SP21 are met.
Explanation
7.58 In line with National Planning Policy, Main Shopping Areas are the areas within Rotherham's centres where retail development is concentrated, and will be the primary locations for new shopping developments. For the purposes of this policy retail is defined as uses falling within Class A1 of The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended).
7.59 Main Shopping Areas consist of Primary Shopping Frontages (which include a high proportion of retail uses) and Secondary Shopping Frontages (which provide opportunities for a diversity of uses). Whilst the emphasis will be upon retaining and encouraging new retail developments within the Primary Shopping Area, it is recognised that other non-retail uses can contribute to the vitality and viability of centres. Policies SP20 and SP21 therefore set out the approach to development within Primary and Secondary Shopping Frontages.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 37 7
Policy SP 20
Primary shopping frontages
To protect and enhance the concentration of A1 shops within Primary Shopping Frontages proposals for A2 financial and professional services and A3 restaurants and cafés uses at ground floor level will be supported where they would:
a. not dilute the concentration of A1 shops in the Primary Shopping Frontage below 70%; and
b. not result in three or more non A1 uses in adjoining premises, or add to existing concentrations of non-A1 uses; and
c. not detract from the appearance and character of the frontage; and
d. retain an active frontage and where the proposal relates to a premises with an existing shopfront, the shop window would continue to be used for display purposes
Uses other than those identified above will not be permitted.
Explanation
7.60 Within town and district centres Primary Shopping Frontages have been defined which include a high proportion of retail uses. These represent the main shopping areas within centres. The Council’s policy is not to prevent uses which genuinely complement shops and shopping, and which contribute to the attractiveness, convenience and general sense of liveliness of centres, nor to restrict them unreasonably to upper floors and secondary frontages. However a certain degree of regulation is necessary to ensure that non-shop uses do not undermine the retail attraction of the centre.
7.61 In order to maintain the shopping focus within these areas the Council will seek to ensure that A1 shop uses in Primary Shopping Frontages are not diluted below 70%; considered on a street basis rather than the percentage across the whole Primary Shopping Frontage. For the purposes of this policy the Council will assess the impact of proposed development on the percentage of A1 units in the specific street within the Primary Shopping Frontage, taking account of units on both sides of the street.
7.62 The Council will also seek to ensure that proposals do not result in three or more units being in non-A1 use, or that proposals do not add to existing concentrations of non-shop uses.
7.63 The quality and appearance of shopping areas is vital to ensure that they remain attractive to visitors. The Council will therefore expect non-A1 uses to contribute positively to the vitality of the Main Shopping Area and not detract from its character and appearance. Uses should retain an active frontage and where there is an existing shopfront, the shop window should continue to be used for display purposes.
38 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.64 The Council will support A2 and A3 uses within Primary Shopping frontages, subject to the requirements above. However other town centre uses are not considered appropriate; in particular new drinking establishments and hot food takeaways are more appropriately located within other parts of town or district centres. This does not affect existing uses already within centres, but will be applied to new development or proposals for a change of use.
7.65 Table listing primary shopping frontages for each centre to be inserted in final document.
Policy SP 21
Secondary Shopping Frontages
Within Secondary Shopping Frontages in addition to A1 shops, proposals for A2 financial and professional services, A3 restaurants and cafés, A4 drinking establishment uses, D1 non-residential institutions and D2 assembly and leisure at ground floor level will be supported where they would:
a. not dilute the concentration of A1 shops in the Secondary Shopping Frontage below 25%; and
b. make a positive contribution to the vitality of the main shopping area; and
c. not detract from the appearance and character of the frontage; and
d. retain an active frontage and where the proposal relates to a premises with an existing shopfront, the shop window would continue to be used for display purposes
Explanation
7.66 Within Secondary Shopping frontages, whilst the Council wishes to retain the overall shopping character there will be greater flexibility to accommodate other supporting uses at ground floor level; namely A2, A3, and A4 uses, along with D1 and D2 uses.
7.67 The Council will seek to ensure that A1 shop uses in Secondary Shopping Frontages are not diluted below 25%; considered on a street basis rather than the percentage across the whole Primary Shopping Frontage. For the purposes of this policy the Council will assess the impact of proposed development on the percentage of A1 units in the specific street within the Secondary Shopping Frontage, taking account of units on both sides of the street.
7.68 As with Primary Shopping Frontages non-A1 uses will be acceptable where they contribute positively to the vitality of the Main Shopping Area and do not detract from its character and appearance. Uses should retain an active frontage and where there is an existing shopfront, the shop window should continue to be used for display purposes.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 39 7
Policy SP 22
Hot Food Takeaways
Hot food takeaways will be permitted within town, district and local centres (but outside of Main Shopping Areas) where they:
a. Would not result in more than 10% of the ground floor units within a defined centre being hot food takeaways; and b. Would not result in more than two A5 units being located adjacent to each other; and c. There are no less than two non-A5 units between hot food takeways; and d. they will not negatively impact upon the amenity of surrounding businesses or residents
Hot food takeaways will only be permitted outside of town, local and district centres where they comply with Core Strategy Policy CS12 and other relevant planning policies. However they will not be permitted where they are within 400m of a primary school, secondary school or college, except where they are within a defined town, local or district centre and satisfy the requirements above.
Explanation
7.69 As a main town centre use, planning policy directs hot food takeaways towards defined centres in the first instance. However it is considered that such uses should not be located within Main Shopping Areas, where the retention of the shopping character is considered of central importance. Unless adequately controlled takeaway uses can result in harmful impacts to the vitality and viability of centres, through shutters being closed throughout the day and clustering of premises which detract from an area's character and function. Takeaways will therefore only be permitted where they do not result in more than 10% of the ground floor units within a defined centre being hot food takeaways. To reduce the impact of clustering, proposals will not be permitted where they would result in two or more A5 units being located next to each other, and where there would be less than two non-A5 units between hot food takeaways.
7.70 The Policy also ensures that permission will only be granted where hot food takeaways will not negatively impact on the amenity of nearby businesses and residents, taking account of issues such as litter, smells, anti-social behaviour, noise and general disturbance, parking and traffic problems.
7.71 Rotherham's Health Profile (2012, Department for Health) shows that about 21.6% of Year 6 children (age 10/11) are classified as obese, higher than the average for England. It also shows that healthy eating adults and the number of obese adults are significantly worse than the England average. The Child Health Profile (Child and Maternal Health Observatory, 2012) also shows that 8% of reception age children (age 4/5) are obese. Data from the National Obesity Observatory shows a strong association between deprivation and the density of fast food outlets, with more deprived areas having more fast food outlets per 100,000 population. It reveals that as of 2010 Rotherham had 78 hot food takeaways per 100,000 population (compared to 77.9 for England as a whole).
40 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.72 Policy SP22 therefore seeks to ensure that new hot food takeaways do not increase the exposure of school children and young adults to these uses. Hot food takeaways will not be permitted within 400m of a primary or secondary school or college. For the purposes of this policy 400m will be measured in a direct line from the school/college gate used by pupils. Where a town, district or local centre is within the 400m radius the criteria in Policy SP22 will apply (as centres are the preferred location for such uses in planning policy terms).
Policy SP 23
Out-of-Centre Retail Parks
Out-of-centre retail proposals catering specifically for bulky durable goods, which may not be readily accommodated within existing centres, will be acceptable in principle on Retail Parks at Cortonwood and Parkgate- Aldwarke, as identified on the Policies Map. Proposals will be supported where they satisfy the requirements of Policy CS12 and other relevant planning policies and are subject to planning conditions which
a. limit the types of goods which can be sold to bulky comparison goods; and b. limit the minimum size of units to 1000 sqm gross
7.73 Whilst current national planning policy seeks to direct shops towards town, district and local centres, over the years Rotherham has seen the development of a number of free-standing retail units and the establishment of a number of retail parks in out-of-centre locations.
7.74 It is acknowledged that retailers of some ‘comparison’ goods such as carpets, furniture, electrical appliances and DIY products, find it advantageous to move to off-centre or out-of-centre locations. However our retail parks now tend to include a range of occupiers, including those selling comparison goods which should ideally be located within centres.
7.75 Whilst acknowledging their role in providing consumer choice and employment opportunities, the Council does not wish to see the further expansion of these out-of-centre retail parks; its priority is ensuring the vitality and viability of shopping and retail centres. The independent analyst PMA ranks Rotherham town centre as experiencing the greatest level of competition amongst the 200 UK centres within its Competition Indicator Model (Property Market Analysis, Rotherham PROMS Retail Report, August 2010).
7.76 In line with national planning policy the Local Plan policies seek to direct main town centre uses to town, district and local centres in the first instance. Core Strategy Policy CS12 sets out how the sequential test will be applied within Rotherham. In particular, in the case of bulky goods proposals which may not be able to find sites either in or on the edge of centres, this includes whether the availability, suitability and viability of vacant premises in retail parks to accommodate the proposed development has been assessed.
7.77 Rotherham’s three retail parks, defined on the Policies Map, are located at:
Cortonwood
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 41 7
Parkgate Shopping Park, Parkgate Great Eastern Way, Aldwarke
7.78 Policy SP23 clarifies that within these Retail Parks proposals for bulky goods uses will be acceptable where they satisfy other planning policy, including Core Strategy Policy CS12. However the Council is aware that retail parks are capable of changing their composition over time. The Policy seeks to ensure that any planning permissions are accompanied by planning conditions to ensure that the development does not subsequently change its character unacceptably. Developments will therefore be limited to the sale of bulky comparison goods and to a minimum unit size of 1000 sqm gross to prevent the development from being subdivided into a large number of smaller shops. 7.4 Movement and accessibility
Policy SP 24
Sustainable transport for development
Development proposals will be supported where it can be demonstrated that:
a. the highway network is suitable to cope with the traffic generated in terms of the number, type and size of vehicles involved, during construction and after occupation,
b. they make adequate arrangements for site access, local traffic circulation, parking and servicing
c. they satisfy the requirements of Core Strategy Policy CS14 and other relevant planning policy
d. schemes have taken into account good practice guidance published by the council covering transport assessment, travel plans and parking.
Explanation
7.79 The highway network has constraints on the volume and type of traffic that it can accommodate. These relate to the type of road and the volume of traffic which is already using it. A transport assessment is the usual way of determining whether the network can accommodate the traffic generated by a proposed development. This would normally include modelling of the effects on local junctions. Access to a road that already has heavy traffic will probably require some mitigation measures to avoid exacerbating existing problems.
7.80 Core Strategy Policy CS14 was developed to ensure that new development is deliverable but with maximum progression towards the use of sustainable and affordable local transport and with minimum disruption to the transport network. Key to any new development is the transport and highways access for employees, residents and visitors. The local authority’s obligation is to protect people from additional traffic congestion, danger and pollution as a result of new development by ensuring that developments of all sizes and locations include the following:
42 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Sustainable access to the development by public transport, walking and cycling. As an example, this could include bus priority schemes, improved or additional bus services, better information and subsidised ticketing or new / improved cycling and walking routes. Measures to ensure that access to and the efficiency of the local and strategic network are not adversely affected and enhanced transport network capacity where sustainable alternatives cannot deliver the full level of access needed. For example, new road junctions, new roads, traffic management schemes. On-site measures to accommodate car, motorcycle and cycle parking (and occasionally bus, coach or HGV parking) and including park and ride where other sustainable travel choices cannot deliver benefits. Compliance with local Residential and Commercial Parking Standards to ensure there is a balance struck between access for motor vehicles and the promotion of sustainable access.
7.81 To meet this obligation, Transport Statements, Transport Assessments and Travel Plans will be required as part of the planning process. There are specific thresholds / circumstances that trigger when these are needed:
In most cases a transport statement or transport assessment would be required for all developments likely to have an impact on the local area. In many cases a travel plan would also be required. Any proposed development which doesn't conform to relevant Local Plan policies would be expected to trigger the need for a transport assessment and a travel plan. Other developments generating 30 or more two-way vehicle movements in any hour or 100 per day would require a transport assessment. This would also be a requirement if a development was proposed in an air quality management area; was likely to generate significant freight, HGV or abnormal load movements per year. Other developments generating less than 30 two-way vehicle movements in any hour or 100 per day would require a transport statement.
7.82 Detailed thresholds can be found in the Council’s Transport Assessments,Travel Plans and Parking Standards: Good Practice Guidance. Further work will be undertaken to adopt this guidance as a Supplementary Planning Document.
7.83 Transport Assessments and Travel Plans are a valuable tool to mitigate traffic from developments. They should include mitigation measures against agreed trip generation levels, target setting (e.g. for cycling, walking and bus use), monitoring and enforcement. In addition to the trip levels agreed and transport and highways measures put forward through the planning process, the development will be monitored to ensure that the agreed trip levels are not exceeded. All developments that trigger a transport assessment will be required to propose appropriate measures and funding in the event that post development monitoring demonstrates trip generations above the levels agreed through the planning process. Such proposals to be calculated based on the mitigation measures that could deliver either further sustainable measures, network improvements or a combination of the two. The mechanisms used to assess and secure such contributions are outlined in other policies.
7.84 The level of developer contribution requirements will be determined by a number of factors including the existing access to the road, public transport and active travel network, the post development maintenance requirements and the size and nature of development. The developer
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 43 7 contribution requirements will be informed considerably by the outputs of the transport assessment and subsequent works through the travel plan. All mechanisms in the travel plan with financial implications must be included in a legal agreement.
7.85 In the event that the trip generations put forward through the transport assessment and travel plan are exceeded, the local planning authority may enforce use of the funding or agreement for works towards mitigating such impacts and or schemes to reduce the impact in the future.
7.86 It is important to recognise that the move towards sustainable travel will only be achieved if everyone plays their part. Rotherham Borough Council is involved with many projects at grass routes level through School Travel Plans. These plans help raise awareness of sustainable travel amongst school children as well as issues about obesity and inactivity. Many of todays school age generation may grow up to find that motorised travel is less freely available and more expensive than it is now. It is important that new developments transport networks accommodate this likelihood.
Policy SP 25
Development affecting designated “Highways Development Control Lines”
Highways development control lines will be protected where use for such land can be clearly identified and such use is supported. Where a development proposal is likely to affect one of these alignments the developer will be required to show how their proposed development will accommodate the future improvements or potentially deliver that improvement as part of the development.
Explanation
7.87 Highways Development control lines have been established to protect the alignments of future improvements to the highway network. This process was formalised and the lines are recorded in reports to cabinet.
7.88 Where a development proposal is likely to affect one of these alignments a developer will be required to show how their proposed development will accommodate the future improvements or potentially deliver that improvement as part of the development.
Policy SP 26
Development affecting Key Routes and the Strategic Road Network
Careful consideration will be given to any potential adverse impacts of development on the Key Transport Routes and the Strategic Road Network. Where a proposal is likely to have transport implications, applicants must set out suitable mitigation measures in their Transport Assessment.
44 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Explanation
7.89 The Key Routes and Strategic Road Network are the main arteries allowing the transport of goods and people to and through the borough. As such they must be protected from the adverse effects of development. These effects primarily take the form of additional vehicle trips that cause congestion and increased queuing at junctions. The analysis of the likely effects of a development on the roads should be addressed by means of a transport assessment. This will identify the scale and nature of the adverse effects. Mitigation should be proposed and modelled as part of the planning application and secured by means of a planning agreement. Where the effects of the development are not severe the developer will be expected to contribute to a future scheme of mitigation where costs are apportioned on the basis of the number of extra trips that the development adds to the network.
Policy SP 27
Safeguarded Land for Transport Schemes
Sites identified for transport schemes, as defined on the Policies Map, will be safeguarded for such uses. Other development involving, or in the vicinity of, land safeguarded for transport schemes will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that:
a. the site is no longer required for, or meets the needs of, transport schemes; or b. development will not prejudice the ability of the site to meet its requirements as part of any transport scheme; or c. an alternative, appropriate, site provides capacity for delivery of the transport scheme; or d. the need for the proposed development outweighs the need to safeguard the site for transport schemes
Explanation
7.90 Sites which have been identified for specific schemes (or where a prior transport use is evident) may be required as part of the future transport network of the borough. Any form of development which involves or is in close proximity to land safeguarded for transport schemes should consider whether the site is necessary or whether a different location might be more appropriate.
7.91 Some land such as rail track beds which are no longer in use, may be useful in the future for either light rail or freight. Allowing development on such a site would be expensive in the long term. Similarly, canal side locations may be suitable for freight related uses, consequently uses such as retail and housing may not be appropriate.
7.92 Sustainable transport of bulk goods by rail or canal will be more important in future as fossil fuel powered road transport becomes more and more expensive. The protection of sites suitable for infrastructure to support sustainable bulk transport is very important.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 45 7
7.93 The alignments of proposed new roads need to be protected to avoid costly diversions or compulsory purchase in the future. Similarly Highways Development Control Lines require safe-guarding to avoid prejudicing future highway improvements.
Policy SP 28
Motorway Service Areas
The Council will consider proposals for the establishment of facilities to meet the needs of motorway travellers on their merits and subject to the other provisions of the Local Plan. Proposals for services should include sustainable refuelling infrastructure.
Explanation
7.94 Motorway service areas provide facilities for travellers alongside motorways and motorway junctions. It is recognised that within Rotherham opportunities for motorway service areas are most likely to occur in the Green Belt where there is a presumption against inappropriate development and planning permission will only be given in exceptional circumstances. Proposals for motorway services will be considered on their merits and the Council will be mindful of the range of facilities for motorway users which already exist in and adjoining the motorway corridors within the Borough and expect developers to clearly demonstrate the need for additional facilities in seeking to justify exceptions to Green Belt policy. Furthermore, the Council will require developers to mitigate the likely impact of development on the local road network, landscape, heritage resources and local amenity. The Council is keen to encourage sustainable travel options and reduce carbon emissions. Therefore proposals for service areas should include sustainable refuelling infrastructure which accommodate alternative means of refuelling such as electric charging points, LPG autogas, compressed natural gas and biodiesel. 7.5 Managing the natural and historic environment
Policy SP 29
Canals
The Council will be supportive of proposals for the sensitive restoration and maintenance, to navigable status, of the canals within its boundaries and will, wherever feasible, seek to protect the lines of those canals or an alternative, designated route from developments likely to prejudice any such future restoration and maintenance.
Explanation
7.95 Canals can be a great source of recreational potential, particularly for leisureboating, fishing and walking. The Council recognises the contribution that the canals could make to the overall recreational provision in the Borough and the potential to attract tourists to the area. For the canals
46 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 in Rotherham to realise this sort of potential a great deal of restoration work will be necessary. Wherever possible and feasible the Council will seek to protect the lines of canals and will be supportive of sensitive restoration proposals.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 47 7
Policy SP 30
Green Infrastructure
a. Development proposals shall respond to opportunities and objectives in green infrastructure including: investing in enhancement and restoration where the opportunities exist, managing conflicts between different interests, protecting sensitive features and assets, ensuring that developments function well in the long term, and providing adaption for climate change. Green infrastructure priorities will be implemented through:
i. Not permitting development that compromises strategy delivery or the integrity of the regional and sub regional green infrastructure networks (including its functions, assets and linkages)
ii Contributing to landscape scale conservation
b. Green infrastructure will be an integral part of the development scheme through the sites site specific design, layout, grain, scale, materials and management and shall be appropriate to the scale and impact of the development.
c. Developers will be responsible for identifying, through appropriate survey and impact assessment the effect of their development on green infrastructure provision, both within the locality and the on the wider network and any identified priorities as appropriate. The development design & layout should be informed by and respond to the results of the green infrastructure impact assessment.
d. Major developments will be required to prepare and submit a master plan or concept plan showing their proposals for green infrastructure. In preparing such a plan developers will need to demonstrate regard to the following as appropriate:
i. current location and functions of green infrastructure
ii. the enhancement of green infrastructure to connect places, address: deficits, priorities, needs and opportunities as appropriate
iii. providing site specific solutions,
iv. improving environmental quality,
v. softening the impact of new development,
vi. delivery of a net gain in outcome for at least one function of green infrastructure.
vii. providing effective and appropriate long term maintenance and management mechanisms
viii Identify: how streets, buildings and green infrastructure are connected and the patters of movement for non vehicular and vehicular users
48 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 e. For housing developments over 200 units; a minimum standard of 10% land area should be provided as green infrastructure either on or off site.
f. Where development is likely to result in significant negative effect on green infrastructure (including green infrastructure assets, functionality, networks and strategies as appropriate), developers will be required to put in place the following:
i. Mitigation measures to minimise the negative effect.
ii. Where appropriate mitigation is not achievable, adequate compensation.
Measures for compensation and mitigation will require replacement on a like for like or better basis and may include enhancement of the quality and robustness of particular green infrastructure functions as appropriate. Permission should not be granted where significant negative effects cannot be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated, or if proposals fail to actively respond to an identified deficiency in green infrastructure. Permission will only be granted were there is compelling justification to do so.
Explanation
7.96 Green infrastructure delivers a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities throughout the borough, promoting more sustainable communities. Green infrastructure corridors will connect locations of natural and historic heritage, green space, biodiversity or other environmental interest, promoting landscape scale conservation.
7.97 The policy will utilise strategies and evidence base studies (namely the Natural England Yorkshire and Humber Mapping Project 2010 and the South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy and (draft) delivery plan) to help prioritise action. The Yorkshire and Humber Mapping Project 2010 methodology identified the strategically important: asset types, corridors and specific corridor functions for the strategically important green infrastructure in Rotherham. The specific component assets of the sub regional and regional corridors, (which are identifiable green spaces, lakes canals etc) and their corridor functions will be protected by this policy. These assets will be both in public and private ownership. Key sub regional projects in Rotherham are identified in the evolving South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Draft Delivery Plan. At a local level it is anticipated that a local green infrastructure strategy will be produced, guiding and identifying local needs and action. Positive planning for green infrastructure is to be encouraged in the urban fringe around central Rotherham, degraded areas and particularly those which may be subject to further growth and change; these areas are likely to be prioritised in any future local green infrastructure strategy.
7.98 Green infrastructure policy seeks an overall net gain in green infrastructure. Where it is impossible to avoid negative impact to significant green infrastructure assets, networks and identified functions, development should consider how impacts can be minimised through use of an alternative site, a change in the design, layout or operation of the development and by the incorporation of suitable mitigation measures. Compensation measures may include enhancement of the quality and robustness of particular green infrastructure functions, these may as appropriate include enhancement to the quality and robustness of ecological networks and climate change adaption measures. Stricter
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 49 7 control will be applied to development affecting identified priorities, and larger applications as they will have most impact.
7.99 The standard of 10% is set to ensure that the development is sustainable and all new development offers a high quality of life and contributes to an enhancing the green infrastructure network. It is considered for any future compliance with national good practice Accessible Natural Green Space Standards (e.g. ANGSt) that this level of green infrastructure would be needed. The standard may be implemented for housing over a certain size e.g. 200 units. It can refer to measures both on and or off site, and may not include gardens (as these areas may be converted later e.g. drives, patios parking spaces).
7.100 Where appropriate, it would normally be provided in the first phase of the development to maximise benefits to new communities. The Core Strategy identifies broad types of green infrastructure assets that may be a suitable form of provision, however, green infrastructure provision would need to be considered on a site by site basis, directed by any relevant identified objectives and deficits (from green infrastructure strategies, recognised evidence base studies, or impact assessments for example) and would need to be appropriate to the scale and impact of the development. Some new types of assets may not be appropriate in certain areas; they need to be sensitive to existing valued functions, and constraints. Additional measures to demonstrate an overall net gain in green infrastructure may as appropriate include providing or enhancing some or all of the following basic green infrastructure functions: (i) landscape character, setting and management, ii) biodiversity and access to nature, iii) water management, iv) climate change adaptation, v) healthy, cohesive communities, vi) green travel, vii) green specifications, plus consideration of viii) standards and facilities, and ix) ensuring green infrastructure delivery (source: “Guidance on Green Infrastructure”, Natural England, 2009). The principles above provide guidance for development proposals to demonstrate compliance with green infrastructure policy in Rotherham; they will also be used to guide the application of the green infrastructure development management policy in relation to other policy areas. Where there is uncertainty surrounding the environmental impact of a particular development, the Council will take an approach in line with the “precautionary principle” unless there are clear overriding benefits from the development concerned.
Delivery
7.101 Planning conditions, planning obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy, surveys, assessment, concept plans, master plans, schemes, and plans will be used to ensure delivery, enhancement, conservation and appropriate management as appropriate. Additional enhancement and / or compensation measures can be delivered off-site, particularly where these measures will meet an identified deficiency and / or create or enhance access to assets within strategic corridors.
7.102 Delivery will need to demonstrate long-term adoption, governance and management of assets created; management plans should be agreed by the local planning authority and be based on relevant good practice to provide secure, long-term, high standards. Positive, long term and high quality management of the boroughs green infrastructure will be encouraged and supported by local authorities and other organisations, agencies, land managers, the private sector and local communities. The Localism Act sets out a new ‘duty to co-operate' which applies to all local planning authorities in England and other public bodies including the South Yorkshire Local Nature Partnership.
50 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.103 Green infrastructure delivers a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities throughout the borough. Rotherham green infrastructure provides many different functions and consequently overlaps and incorporates aspects of many other policy areas. Green infrastructure requirements may be reflected in other policy areas to deliver green infrastructure objectives. Like wise these overlapping policy areas may in their own right seek additional action and measures outside this green infrastructure policy e.g. green space; this is part of green infrastructure, but green space policy is primarily concerned with accessible green space, sport and recreation provision whereas green infrastructure emphasis is to promote sustainability benefits (through developing multifunctional networks of green and blue spaces at a variety of scales). Green infrastructure policy will be directed by: identified objectives (from green infrastructure strategies, recognised evidence base studies, impact assessments etc and will be appropriate to the scale and impact of the development). It essentially requires consideration of implications of a development upon the wider green infrastructure network. It seeks to promote a more coordinated and focused approach to delivering environmental and quality of life benefits for the benefit of communities; then previous, piece meal, policy by policy approach. There may be times potentially where conflicts may occur with different individual functions or specific interests and boarder green infrastructure objectives. Provision is made to safeguard existing functions, avoiding damage to assets and protection of the integrity of the regional and sub regional green infrastructure networks. Green infrastructure local strategy production is seen as an important forum for the agreement of local green infrastructure objectives, and the identification of specific further possible delivery activities (to receive policy backing) as resources allow. Green infrastructure will be one policy consideration to be balanced in planning decisions amongst others.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 51 7
Policy SP 31
Conserving the natural environment
Development should retain existing and enhance or create new features of biodiversity value, and preserve features of geological value.
Development should not only aim to incorporate those features (or species) that are protected by statute or through land-use planning mechanisms but also those which contribute more widely to ecological networks and the nature conservation value and landscape character of the area.
Where it is impossible to avoid negative impact on a feature of biodiversity or geodiversity value development should consider how impacts can be minimised through use of an alternate site, a change in the design, layout or operation of the development and by the incorporation of suitable mitigation measures.
Where there is no reasonable alternative to the loss of features of biodiversity or geodiversity value development should provide an adequate level of compensation. When considering compensation for habitat or geological loss, the loss of significant features or impairment to wider ecological networks, the aim should always be to replace ‘like for like’ or better.
Development will be expected to incorporate the enhancement of biodiversity and geodiversity on-site and to contribute to the delivery of wider biodiversity and geodiversity action and opportunity objectives off-site as appropriate.
Development design should promote the enhancement, restoration and creation of natural habitats, ecological networks and ecosystem services.
Development should promote the inclusion and preservation of geodiversity features within landscape design.
Explanation
7.104 Development proposals will be required to establish impact on the natural environment (Biodiversity and Geodiversity); development will be required to safeguard any substantive nature conservation interest and will be expected to incorporate best practise in respect of enhancing the natural environment. Development proposals where the primary objective is to conserve or enhance nature conservation will be supported.
7.105 The responsibility will lie with the developer to demonstrate that proposals adequately identify and consider their effect on the natural environment by the provision of ecological and geodiversity impact assessment, including the submission of detailed, timely and up to date survey, evaluation and records relevant to the development proposal.
7.106 Development will be required to make a positive contribution to the natural environment by incorporating biodiversity gain, sustainable design and renewable energy technology. In addition, where appropriate, direct contribution to Ecological Networks, the Green Infrastructure network,
52 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas, Nature Improvement Areas and Living Landscapes will be required. Such networks are designed to have benefits at a landscape scale and coordination across local planning authority boundaries may demonstrate an enhanced contribution.
7.107 If significant harm to the natural environment resulting from a development cannot be avoided, adequately mitigated, or, as a last resort, compensated for, then planning permission should be refused; such development will only be permitted when there is compelling justification to do so.
7.108 Development will be encouraged to use available information to guide biodiversity and geodiversity mitigation, compensation and gain.
7.109 The principles, objectives and available mapping of ecological networks, Biodiversity Opportunity Areas, Nature Improvement Areas, Living Landscapes, National Character Areas and River Catchment Management Plans should be used to identify appropriate measures and demonstrate delivery.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 53 7
Map 1 Rotherham Biodiversity Opportunity Area Map
54 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 32
Statutorily Protected Sites
Development or changes of use on land within or outside a statutorily protected site (either individually or in combination with other developments) which would adversely affect the interest, fabric or setting of the site will not be permitted.
Explanation
7.110 Statutorily protected sites in Rotherham include Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Local Nature Reserves (LNR), which are protected and designated under national legislation due to their special value for nature conservation and, where possible, for their educational and community value.
7.111 It is acknowledged that activity in Rotherham may also have an impact on sites protected at a European, National or Local level outside the borough; this policy will be used to guide activity that may have an impact on these sites.
7.112 In all such cases the views of the relevant statutory agency will be sought. The Council will only support proposals where there will be no adverse effect on the reasons for designation and then only on the express advise of the statutory agency concerned.
7.113 An exception should only be made where the benefits of the development, at the proposed site, have been demonstrated to clearly outweigh both the impacts that it is likely to have on the features of the site that make it of special conservation interest and any broader impacts on the national network of protected sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 55 7
Policy SP 33
Non Statutorily Protected Sites and Areas
Development that would directly, or indirectly, adversely affect a site or area designated or otherwise protected for nature conservation interests, including but not limited to the following, will not normally be permitted:
a. Local Wildlife Site b. Local Geological Sites including Regionally Important Geological Sites
Such development will only be permitted where the Local Planning Authority is satisfied that:
a. the need for the development outweighs the need to protect the site and the need to safeguard the intrinsic interests b. there are no reasonable alternative sites or solutions to accommodate the development proposed c. adequate measures to mitigate or compensate for the harm can be put in place
In all cases where development or land use change is permitted which would damage a protected site or feature, such damage will be kept to a minimum. Where appropriate, the authority will consider the use of planning conditions, planning obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy to provide appropriate compensatory measures.
Before any development or land use change that may affect a protected site is commenced any measures considered necessary to mitigate or compensate for any harm to the site or its features of interest must be agreed and put in place.
Sites that are under consideration for statutory or non-statutory designation (including candidate local sites) and sites that are subsequently found to have equivalent value to designated sites will receive the same level of protection as designated sites. If a development proposal is received for a candidate site the planning process should facilitate data collection and analysis to establish the sites suitability for designation.
Explanation
7.114 Non-statutory sites of local nature conservation value, unlike national and other statutory designations, are identified within the context of the Borough of Rotherham. The designation of non-statutory sites in Rotherham is based on agreed criteria and quality standards that reflect the extent, variation and quality of the nature conservation resource in the Borough.
7.115 Locally designated areas are recognised has having local importance for nature conservation and complement nationally and internationally designated sites. Local Sites are protected within the planning framework and are a material consideration when planning applications are being determined.
56 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 34
Protected and Priority Species
Planning permission for development likely to have a direct or indirect adverse impact on the following will only be granted if it can be demonstrated that there is an overriding need for the development and that mitigation and/or compensation measures can be put in place that enable the status of the species to be maintained or enhanced.
a. Protected species b. Species of principal importance for the conservation of biodiversity c. Populations of species associated with statutorily protected sites
Measures must be in place to mitigate / compensate for any impact before development is commenced.
Explanation
7.116 The presence of a protected species is a material consideration when a planning authority is considering a development proposal that, if carried out, would be likely to result in harm to the species or its habitat. In all such cases the views of the relevant statutory agency will be sought and respected and regard will be given to the requirements of relevant legislation.
7.117 Development should enable the protection and recovery of protected and priority species populations. Consideration of impact on protected species will follow best practise as provided by the Government’s advisor on the natural environment (currently Natural England).
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 57 7
Policy SP 35
Irreplaceable Habitats and Features of Nature Conservation Importance
Planning permission will not be granted for development likely to have a direct or indirect adverse impact upon irreplaceable habitats or features of demonstrable nature conservation importance, unless it can be demonstrated that the justification for the development clearly outweighs their importance for nature conservation and amenity value and that adequate mitigation and/or compensation measures can be put in place.
Where any such features are to be lost as part of a development proposal, the Council will impose conditions, planning obligations and / or Community Infrastructure Levy where appropriate to mitigate or compensate for the loss. Where features are to be retained within larger developments, long-term appropriate management will be required.
Such features include:
a. Ancient woodland b. Aged or veteran trees outside of ancient woodlands c. Hedgerows and field boundaries, d. Trees, woodlands, plantations and shelter belts, e. Rivers and other waterways, including canals, and their associated corridors, f. Wetlands, ponds and reservoirs, g. Habitats of principal importance, h. Habitats or features supporting species of principle importance or conservation concern i. Orchards, j. Natural rock outcrops and exposed rock features, caves and karst, and natural stone within the built environment.
The Council will protect individual and groups of trees by the declaration of Tree Preservation Orders where it is important in the interest of visual amenity or there is reason to believe that trees are under specific threat.
Development that contributes to the preservation, restoration and creation of priority habitats or geological features, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species populations, will be supported.
Explanation
7.118 Rotherham contains a rich variety of sites and features of nature conservation value, many of these have been identified and are well recorded whilst other aspects remain as yet undiscovered or little studied. Throughout the borough, and not just within defined sites, this resource should be conserved. Development should support the identification and protection of new features of conservation value.
58 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.119 Development should not result in the loss or deterioration of sites, habitat or features that are considered to be irreplaceable due to their age, status, connectivity, rarity or continued presence.
7.120 The preferred option is to retain the interest intact and in situ. Sympathetic design should be used to safeguard the interest and should demonstrate that its conservation will be improved or enhanced. Provision should be made to enable the interest to mature, expand and adapt as it would under natural circumstances.
7.121 Measures to mitigate or provide biodiversity and geodiversity gain should be complementary to any interest retained.
7.122 Applications for any works to protected trees or woodland should be submitted to the planning system where the suitability of the proposals will be assessed; where permission is granted the permission may be subject to conditions. Where replacement planting is required, issues such as biodiversity will be taken into account. Replanting with native species will be encouraged to allow ecological networks to remain functional and to prevent the isolation of trees and woodlands within the landscape; new tree planting will be considered for protection.
7.123 Areas designated under Part 2 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 may also receive special provision for the protection of trees. Hedgerows of historical and ecological importance may be protected by the Enclosure Acts and the Hedgerow Regulations.
7.124 Impact on and contribution to the delivery of national and local targets and strategies for biodiversity or geodiversity action, landscape character, the protection and enhancement of green infrastructure and enhancement of the functionality and permeability of ecological networks will be used to determine compliance with this policy.
Policy SP 36
Soil Resources
Development will be required to demonstrate the sustainable use of soils during construction and operation stages including measures to retain green space, incorporate Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems, avoid use of peat and to enable appropriate remediation of contaminated soils. Built development should be designed and sited with an appreciation of the relative functional capacity of soil resources and threats to soils with the aim of preserving or enhancing identified soil functions.
The use of the best and most versatile agricultural land for any form of development not associated with agriculture or forestry will not be permitted unless there is a strong case for development which overrides the need to protect such land. Where development is permitted on the best and most versatile agricultural land it should, as far as possible, use the lowest grade of land suitable for the development.
Proposals that promote careful management practises to conserve the character of the borough’s soils will be supported. The use of imported soil and aggregates in development proposals should consider the impact on the geodiversity and associated biodiversity.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 59 7
Explanation
7.125 Soil resources need to be conserved for the continuation of ecosystem services, including food production, water management and nutrient cycling. Once land has been developed, even temporarily, it is often impractical to return it to agricultural use.
7.126 The best and most versatile land is that in grades 1, 2 and 3a. As a national resource for the future considerable weight is given to protecting such land from development.
7.127 Development should avoid the introduction of calcareous aggregates to areas with undisturbed soils in the Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Yorkshire Coalfield National Character Area and should avoid the introduction of acidic aggregates to areas with undisturbed soils in the Southern Magnesian Limestone National Character Area.
Delivery
7.128 The above policies will be applied during the planning application process. Planning conditions, planning obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy will be used, where appropriate, to ensure protection, enhancement and appropriate long-term management.
7.129 Where there is any uncertainty surrounding the environmental impact of a development a precautionary approach will be taken by the planning authority.
60 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 37
Landscape
a) Development proposals should consider the retention, protection, conservation and management of existing landscape features and characteristics which contribute to the local landscape character and consider landscape as an integral part of development proposals which can encourage future investment, regeneration and tourism.
b) Where development proposals have potential to result in a significant impact on the borough’s landscape and visual amenity, development proposals should identify the potential impact and consider how any negative effects can be minimised. In doing so consideration should be given to the following:-
i. Alternative site selection, design, form, layout, orientation and/ or operation of the development.
ii. The incorporation of suitable mitigation measures.
iii. Where appropriate mitigation measures are not achievable, then development should provide an adequate level of compensation.
If significant negative effects to landscape interests resulting from development cannot be adequately mitigated or as a last resort be compensated for then planning permission should be refused; such development will only be permitted where there is compelling justification to do so.
c) Developers will be required to supply details of design and landscaping for approval in order to inform the preparation of a well laid out landscape scheme which makes a positive contribution to existing landscape and townscape; developers will be responsible for undertaking appropriate survey, assessment and evaluation with regard to the following:
i. Topography, geology, natural patterns of drainage
ii. The type, location and composition of wildlife habitat, Green Infrastructure and ecological networks.
iii. The presence, pattern and composition of existing historic landscape features including hedgerows, field boundaries, ancient and semi-natural woodland, veteran trees,
iv. The pattern and distribution of footpaths, settlements and roads.
v. The special qualities and landscape features which contribute to landscape character and local distinctiveness, the setting of neighbouring settlements and where relevant adjacent landscape character areas.
vi. The visual aspects of the landscape setting including visually sensitive skylines, safeguarding and enhancement of important views to and from significant landscape & historic features of significant local value.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 61 7
vii. Careful site selection, design & layout, appropriate scale & density, consideration of function & end use, use of vernacular materials and locally occurring species, and provision for long term maintenance and Management.
d) Through the development management process the Council will :-
i. Require development proposals to manage change in landscape sensitively in order to minimise the adverse impacts and maximise the beneficial impacts of development.
ii. Require development proposals where appropriate, to contribute to the provision of a quality transition between urban and rural areas and the enhancement of the urban fringes and other degraded areas in accordance with identified Landscape Character Area management strategies.
Explanation
7.130 The Areas of High Landscape Value will be retained until at least until such time that more detailed landscape character assessment work and analysis has been carried out.
7.131 Significant landscape and historic features of significant local value will include country parks, other major outdoor recreation areas, historic churches, conservation areas, historic parks and gardens, important gateway features and land marks of local value.
7.132 The significance of landscape and visual effects is determined by assessing the magnitude of change within the context of the landscape quality or sensitivity to change. In determining significance of effect, other key criteria such as the extent or scale of the effect, the duration and nature of the effect, the angle of view or location in relation to the main activity of the receptor, the distance of the viewpoint from the proposed development should be taken into account. Significance of effect is arrived at using professional judgement, clear assessment criteria in accordance with best practice guidance (“Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment", second edition, Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, 2002; and “Design Manual For Roads & Bridges, Volume 11”, Highways Agency, 2008) and in the context of a specific set of developments proposals. For each impact an explanation should be given about how the significance of effect has been arrived at and the justification for that conclusion.
7.133 Landscape scheme preparation shall be appropriate to the scale of the development and its impact, considerations in scheme production include:
Biodiversity, green infrastructure and climate change Existing soil resource and ground preparation Boundary treatments, security and natural surveillance. Retention of existing vegetation Species selection and spatial requirements Site services and circulation Tree planting size Drainage, including use of green roofs, rain gardens and rainwater harvesting. Gradients.
62 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Community involvement, access and safety issues Maintenance and management including replacements of failed stock Landscape Character, visual appearance, use of materials for hard landscape areas Good practice guidance
7.134 The Council has limited resources for the management and maintenance of green space and planting schemes, and there is currently a presumption against adoption of areas for maintenance (except through Flood and Water Act 2010 implementation). Developers, subsequent owners and occupiers of development are being asked to assume a longer term maintenance responsibility, in accordance with national planning policy.
Delivery
7.135 Planning conditions, planning obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy will be used where appropriate to ensure protection, enhancement and appropriate long term management of landscapes. Positive, long term and high quality management of the landscape will be encouraged and supported by local authorities and other organisations, agencies, land managers, the private sector and local communities. Landscape guidance will overlap into other policy areas please refer to Green infrastructure and Design policies in particular. Further landscape guidance is on the Council Web site.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 63 7
Policy SP 38
New and improved Green Space
All residential development proposals will be expected to make a contribution to green space in line with the following approach:
a. Additional green spaces should be provided in new development at a rate of 24m2 per resident only where there would otherwise be a gap in provision as defined by the accessibility standards of all new homes being within 280m of a Local Green Space and 840m of a Neighbourhood or Borough Green Space. b. Composition of new green space should consider the Borough-wide standards for playing pitches and play spaces:
i. Taking account of the Rotherham Playing Pitch Strategy recommendations (subject to periodic review) for provision of mini-soccer, junior & senior football, cricket, and rugby union & league pitches ii. Being within 15 minutes walking time of an equipped play area (which includes a variety of experiences for different age groups) and 5 minutes of an unequipped play area
c. Provision of allotment land of 0.175ha (equivalent to 7 plots each of 250m2) per 1000 people d. Where new homes are already served by existing Green Spaces, then there should be a financial contribution, determined by the number of residential units being developed, to enhance existing Green Space based on an assessment of need within the local area. e. New Green Space and enhancements to existing Green Spaces will be accompanied by either (i) provision for maintenance by a landscape management company or similar, to standards agreed with the Local Authority for a period of not less than fifty years, or (ii) a financial contribution by way of a commuted sum equivalent to the cost of maintaining new Green Space or enhancements to existing Green Space for a period of thirty years. In the case of new allotments, a not-for-profit management body should be established.
Table 1 Accessible Green Space
Type and main Characteristics function
Borough Green Large areas and sites with intrinsic special interest, e.g. heritage, landscape, Spaces wildlife, children’s amusements sporting. Good level of visitor facilities. Appropriate on-site staff levels to manage site and visitor numbers. Several Weekend and events per annum. Attract people from over a large area. Car parking at occasional visits by car key locations. or public transport
64 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Type and main Characteristics function
Neighbourhood Well maintained landscape setting with a variety of features and facilities Green providing
Spaces for a range of activities, e.g. Outdoor sports facilities and playing fields,
children’s play and informal recreation pursuits. Regular staff (ranger) visits and Weekend, early morning,after school occasional events. Site signs. and evening visits by foot, cycle, car and short bus trips
Local Green Spaces Protected and appropriately maintained site providing safe and clean areas for Regular use mainly by pedestrian visitors, walking, informal recreation and play, sitting out areas and playing fields including preferred if the routes to school, shops, work etc sites are large enough.
Explanation
7.136 The Council expects developers to take account of green space as part of the residential development proposal. The provision of new green space in development proposals should be considered as an integral part of the development. The provision of green space in residential proposals can be quite complex as the varied types of green space provide different functions and benefits to the local community. Recreational green spaces within or adjacent to residential areas is the most regularly and intensively used type of open space. It can comprise one or more character types supporting a variety of uses including informal grass areas, children's play facilities, sport pitches, multi-use games areas, skate parks and tennis courts. Consideration may also need to be given to other forms of green space which include more diverse character such as woodlands, wildlife conservation areas, allotments and green corridors.
7.137 It is important therefore that developers respond to local demand by providing greenspace of appropriate scale and types within development proposals. We will liaise with the developer to agree area specific priorities for the development proposal. We will also agree with the developer how the green spaces will be protected, managed and maintained.
7.138 In estimating new resident populations within a development, the calculation will be based upon the number of properties to be created, with a standard occupancy multiplier of 2.3 persons per dwelling applied to establish new green space requirements. Gaps in provision are defined as
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 65 7 those where any part (irrespective of size) of the site is not covered by the accessibility standards detailed in Policy SP38.
7.139 The standards included take account of Rotherham's Green Space & Playing Pitch Strategies, as well as guidance from Fields in Trust and the levels of provision equivalent to the average that is enjoyed by people elsewhere in the Country (as established by DCLG).
Policy SP 39
Protecting Green Space
We will only allow development proposals that result in the loss of green space where:
a. An assessment shows its loss would not affect the existing and potential green space needs of the local community; or b. An appropriate replacement green space of at least equivalent community benefit, accessibility and value is provided in the area which it serves; or c. The development is for facilities of appropriate scale and type needed to support or improve the proper function of the remaining green space
Development proposals within the immediate vicinity of green space must not impact negatively on the amenity, ecological value and functionality of the space. All adverse impacts must be negated through the design of the scheme.
Development that would result in the loss of any small incidental areas of Green Space, not specifically identified on the Policies Map, but which make a significant contribution to the character of residential areas and/or green infrastructure will not be permitted.
Explanation
7.140 The recreational quality of green spaces can be eroded by insensitive development or incremental loss of a site. This policy and the Proposals Map identifies which areas are protected. The provision of new ancillary sports facilities, and play equipment may be supported on open space policy areas provided the development proposal improves the site and results in no significant loss of recreationally valuable open space. Appropriate development on green space may include a new play area, a multi-use games area (MUGA), a sports pavilion, or changing room improvements or extensions. Ultimately the development has to result in an overall improvement to the site, be sensitive to the local situation and provide significant benefits to the users.
7.141 It should be noted that urban areas include numerous open green spaces which are too small to be mapped. These areas tend to be amenity road verges, landscaped or ‘grassed’ incidental open spaces around buildings and residential areas and have little or no recreational value. They can however make an important contribution to the environmental quality of the area and as such contribute positively to the urban aesthetic. Furthermore as part of developments that take place during the life of this plan, new open spaces will be created which are not shown on the Proposals
66 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Map. Therefore, proposals for the expansion of buildings into ‘non-designated’ green space will be required to identify why the need for the development outweighs the loss of the green space.
7.142 Development proposals which result in the loss of green space will normally be presumed to be unacceptable. However, we also acknowledge that not all green space is of value to the local community. In such a case an assessment will be required to identify whether the site is suitable for a different type of green space use. Permanent loss of green space will require careful consideration as this can result in increased pressure on remaining facilities. In such cases, development is therefore likely to be conditional upon a financial contribution being made to expand and improve other greenspace facilities within the locality.
Policy SP 40
Play Spaces
The council will protect existing play spaces across the borough by resisting their loss to development, unless:
a. a replacement play space of (as a minimum) equivalent size and functionality is provided to meet the needs of the local population. Where this is not possible development will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances where there are over-riding planning merits to the proposal, and the capacity of other local play spaces shall be increased taking account of the needs associated with any increase in local population; or b. it can be demonstrated robustly that they are no longer required and that their loss would not lead to a shortfall in overall play provision in the local area.
Explanation
7.143 The key issues relating to children’s play are the nature and location of play, the influence of age and gender, safety, risk issues and consideration of the types of play environments needed to meet play needs.
7.144 The standards of provision recommended reflect changing views towards children’s play provision. In particular the need to provide both designated areas and casual play opportunities which respond to the needs of different age groups and which are of value to the development of children and young people. In particular, proposals for young people (older than 12) including Multi-Use Games Areas, skate and bmx parks, and youth shelters need to be considered alongside younger person's provision.
7.145 Applicants are advised to consult with the Council on proposed locations and refurbishment of play sites to ensure that local children and young people have been consulted and that the intended space meets all expectations.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 67 7
Policy SP 41
Sport and Recreation
Developments that would result in the loss of existing (or land last used for) public sport and recreation facilities will not be permitted unless:
a. It can be demonstrated that the land is surplus to the requirements of the local community; b. Alternative provision is made of new facilities which meet identified need taking account of the quality and quantity of provision, with local population increase provided for; c. Replacement facilities are appropriately and accessibly located.
Developments that provide private sports and recreation facilities should enter into a Community Use Agreement to promote and allow access by local communities.
Explanation
7.146 Outdoor recreation spaces can take a number of forms, including public and private sports grounds and facilities, school playing fields and allotment gardens. Such sites can provide opportunities for alternative uses or forms or development, however this should not be at the expense of community requirements. We will therefore safeguard outdoor recreational areas except where it can be clearly demonstrated that sites are surplus to the requirements of the community taking account of such factors as accessibility and amenity value. Alternatively, the Council may allow their development for another use in cases where acceptable compensatory provision is made. Consideration will also be given to whether sites have an alternative green space value.
7.147 The Council has a major role in ensuring that future pitch provision meets changing patterns of demand, not only as a service provider but also as a planning authority. For this reason work has been undertaken by the Council, supported by Sport England, to better understand current and future requirements for pitches in different sports. We have also looked at the current quantity and quality of pitches so that we can assess where improvements might be needed to meet demand. This work has allowed us to produce a Playing Pitch Strategy with individual standards recommended for each type of pitch.
7.148 Allotment gardens provide a valuable recreational resource for the community. Some allotment gardens have statutory protection, but this policy seeks to extend protection, where appropriate to all allotments within the Borough. There will be a general presumption against the development of allotment gardens, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no need for the facility in the locality and the site has no other green space value or where suitable alternative provision is made.
7.149 Proposals for indoor recreation, stadia or Multi-use Games facilities contribute towards the leisure needs of the Borough. They are therefore, supported in principle to provide for a wide range of recreational and leisure opportunities subject to compatibility with other relevant policies of the plan.
68 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 42
Design and Location of Green Space, Sport and Recreation
Proposals for green space, sport & recreation and children’s play space within new and existing developments will be supported where it is:
a. an equal and integral part of the design process from the outset; b. able to deliver green space to the recommended accessibility standards set out in SP38 of 280m and 840m; c. provided in a timely manner; d. landscaped and sited on land suitable for the purpose; e. located away from busy roads and car-parks, or separated from them by suitable boundary treatments; f. attractive and sited in open locations, easily observed by non-users; g. accessible to as many potential users as possible; h. easily accessed by pedestrians and cyclists; i. linked to other green spaces either directly or via green corridors; j. ensures ease of maintenance, operational sustainability (repair and replacements), and affordable quality management for the lifetime of the equipment;
Additionally in the case of Play Spaces:
k. provides for risk and challenge, without putting users in danger of serious harm; l. provides appropriate buffer zones; m. accounts for industry standards and practice.
Explanation
7.150 Within new developments green space (and green infrastructure) provision should be an integral part of the master planning process. When producing a master plan the developer should evaluate the facilities in the vicinity of the proposal, by taking account of the quantity and accessibility and then assessing the quality, and value to the local community. This will identify priorities in the area and allow for inclusion of the priorities into the development scheme.
7.151 For outdoor sport, informal play and recreation provision, master plans should:
identify types of green spaces, their locations and define the uses identify movement patterns for pedestrians, cycles and motor vehicles identify how the streets and open space are connected identify relationships between buildings (including indoor sports facilities) and public and private spaces
7.152 These issues can be remedied in part by dual use agreements and opening school fields, clubs and private premises to the public, or ensuring that new community proposals take account
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 69 7 of, and contribute toward addressing highlighted issues. Problems can also be dealt with by adapting the outdoor environment to make it safer for pedestrians and cyclists, which in turn contributes toward a safer environment for children and young people to play.
7.153 With regard to policy SP42 it is essential that facilities, such as children’s play areas are safe, easily observed, accessible, provide challenges, but are not unsafe, and do not lead to further nuisance. Sustainability is also important, and facilities should not be considered that incur excessive maintenance and management costs.
Policy SP 43
Listed Buildings
Development proposals involving or likely to affect the setting of a Listed Building will be considered against the following principles:
a. There is a presumption in favour of the preservation or enhancement of listed buildings and structures and therefore the total or substantial demolition of a listed building will be strongly resisted. b. The significance of a listed building can be harmed by unsympathetic extensions or alterations including to its appearance, plan form or replacement of windows. Extensions and alterations to a listed building will only be considered acceptable where they relate sensitively to the listed building and preserve or enhance the special interest and significance. c. The council encourages the development of good quality, contextual design, including within the setting of listed buildings. Development which has an adverse effect on the setting of a listed building(s) will not be acceptable. d. The best use for a listed building is usually that for which it was designed. However, where the original use of a listed building may no longer be viable or sustainable, other uses may be considered acceptable provided they do not harm the significance of the listed building. e. The council will support proposals and alterations to listed buildings in order to mitigate climate change only where such proposals respect the significance of the listed building and do not have an adverse impact on its appearance, character or historic fabric. f. The council will take necessary measures to ensure that neglected listed buildings are appropriately repaired and/or reused.
Explanation
7.154 Statutory listed buildings are buildings, objects or structures protected by the legislation in the Planning(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. National planning policy provides for the protection of Listed Buildings.
7.155 Core Strategy Policy CS23 aims to protect and enhance Rotherham’s heritage and highlights that Rotherham has a rich historic environment.
70 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.156 Applications for listed building consent must be accompanied by a heritage statement which demonstrates a clear understanding of the significance of the affected listed building and of the impact of any proposals on its character and appearance.
7.157 There is a presumption in favour of retaining Listed Buildings so permission to demolish will be the exception and only allowed if all other options to retain the building are demonstrated to have been thoroughly explored.
7.158 The repair, renovation, alteration and extension of a Listed Building should not be at the expense of its intrinsic value. It is important to guard against unnecessary change or over-restoration. In any change, materials should be sympathetic to those used in the original building. In particular the Council will resist applications that result in the loss of traditional features that could be preserved.
7.159 Listed Buildings may become vacant and derelict if no acceptable alternative use can be found. The original use may be the most appropriate and will be encouraged where possible. Where this is not practicable the alternative use proposed must not require alteration to the extent that the character and historical importance of the building is destroyed.
7.160 Where the Council considers that a proposal would have an impact on the setting of a Listed Building, it will require the submission of illustrative and technical material to allow that impact to be properly assessed. This will include details to show the existing situation and the precise effect on the fabric and character of the Listed Building and its setting.
7.161 Planning permission will be refused where the Council considers that the proposal would dominate the Listed Building or buildings within its curtilage by scale, form, mass or appearance or harm the visual relationship between the Listed Building and its formal or natural landscape surroundings.
Policy SP 44
Development Within or Affecting Conservation Areas
Development proposals within or likely to affect the setting of a Conservation Area will be considered against the following principles:
a. Developments are required to ensure the preservation or enhancement of the special character or appearance of Rotherham’s conservation areas and their settings. b. There is a presumption in favour of the preservation of buildings and structures, both listed and unlisted, which make a positive contribution to the special character or appearance of conservation areas. c. Spaces, street patterns, views, vistas, uses, trees and landscapes which contribute to the special character or appearance of a conservation area are required to be safeguarded. d. Where up to date conservation area appraisals are not available, or if deemed necessary, developers are required to submit character statements to demonstrate the impact of the development upon the character and appearance of the conservation area.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 71 7
Explanation
7.162 Conservation Areas are defined as areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. Within Rotherham, twenty eight Conservation Areas have been designated as shown on the Policies Map.
7.163 Under Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, every local authority is required, from time to time, to determine which parts of their area are worthy of preservation and enhancement and designate them as conservation areas.
7.164 Opportunities to amend the boundaries of conservation areas can be considered as part of the Council's rolling programme of conservation area character appraisals. Article 4 Directions will be used, where appropriate, to protect or enhance the character and appearance of a Conservation Area. These Directions remove certain permitted development rights meaning that planning permission would need to be sought for work which normally does not need one.
7.165 If a site lies within a Conservation Area or is located nearby, planning permission will not be granted where development proposals neither preserve nor enhance the character or appearance of that area. Proposals will need to consider the council’s conservation area character appraisals and suite of Supplementary Planning Documents.
7.166 The Council will consider proposals against guidance contained within relevant English Heritage guidance documents on Conservation Areas, such as "Valuing Places: Good Practice in Conservation Areas" (English Heritage, 2011).
7.167 The Council holds a presumption against the loss of landscaping and trees in conservation areas and acknowledges that the street scene is very important but also consider that other, more private viewpoints are important if the conservation area is to retain its character and integrity. This means conservation area policies apply to all aspects of proposals for development within conservation areas, regardless of whether they can be seen from public areas.
7.168 Rotherham’s conservation areas vary considerably. Whilst some have similarities of form and design, others get their character from diversity. The policy is particularly relevant as this means that the bulk, form and height of development within the area should conform to that character by reflecting the uniformity or diversity of the locality of the conservation area in question. Where uniformity forms part of the character of a street, it will not normally be appropriate to vary from it, while in other areas, where diversity exists, irregular building heights or form might be more appropriate.
7.169 The success of a design can often be dependent upon the skill in use of materials and detailing. If an area contains strong unifying elements, e.g. doors, windows, bays and gables, it may therefore be desirable to reflect these and their form, proportion and the relationship between solids and voids will be taken into account.
7.170 The special interest of a conservation area can depend on even minor development being in keeping with the character of that area. Therefore, the NPPF advises that consideration is given to the introduction of Article 4 Directions which would require planning permission for certain works
72 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 which normally do not need it. The Conservation Area Appraisals will attempt to identify areas where Article 4 Directions might be beneficial.
7.171 In addition to Rotherham's Conservation Area Design Guidelines the Council will undertake a programme of conservation area appraisals, management plans and enhancement schemes to manage change and guide development in conservation areas.
Policy SP 45
Demolition of Buildings in Conservation Areas
Conservation area consent will not be granted for the demolition of a building in a conservation area which makes a positive contribution to the character or appearance of the area unless it can be clearly demonstrated that:
a. there is no realistic prospect of the building continuing in its existing use or that a suitable alternative use cannot reasonably be found; or b. the building is in poor structural condition and the cost of repairing and maintaining it would be disproportionate in relation to its importance and to the value derived from its continued use; and c. the demolition is part of a redevelopment proposal which would, in its own right, serve to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area.
In exceptional circumstances, the fact that a development would bring substantial benefits to the local community may be weighed in the balance against arguments in favour of the preservation of the building.
Explanation
7.172 Conservation Areas are designated because of their special architectural or historic interest the character and appearance of which it is desirable to preserve and enhance. We are appraising the qualities of our conservation areas in a rolling programme which will produce separate Character Appraisals for each conservation area. Within Conservation Areas there will normally be a presumption against the total or substantial demolition of non-listed buildings that make a positive contribution to the character or appearance of the area.
7.173 In exceptional cases where it can be reasonably demonstrated that the building is as a whole incapable of accommodating an appropriate and viable, beneficial use, or that it is beyond viable repair, the merits of the proposed redevelopment of the site may be a material consideration when an application for demolition is considered. The applicant will be required to submit detailed proposals for the redevelopment of the site after demolition. Where appropriate a condition will be imposed that prevents the demolition of the building in question until a contract has been let for the approved redevelopment of the site.
7.174 The demolition of an historic building cannot be justified simply because it is economically more attractive to redevelop than to repair and re-use, or because a developer has acquired a building
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 73 7 at a price that reflects the potential for redevelopment. In situations where owners may have allowed their buildings to deteriorate structurally over a period of time, less weight may be attached to the condition of the building when assessing a case for its demolition.
7.175 The demolition of buildings within Conservation Areas can have a damaging effect by removing structures that contribute to their character or leaving unsightly gaps in the built-up environment. As with listed buildings, where buildings in conservation areas contribute positively to the street scene, there will be a presumption in favour of retention. However, where this is not the case, the criteria in the NPPF will ensure that demolition is allowed only when detailed plans for the site’s redevelopment have been approved, to ensure that the scheme will conserve and enhance the character of the area.
Policy SP 46
Archaeology and Scheduled Ancient Monuments
Development proposals involving archaeology or scheduled ancient monuments will be considered against the following principles:
a. The council will ensure the preservation of locally and nationally important archaeological remains and their settings within the borough, whether these are designated as 'Scheduled Monuments' or not. Developments must not adversely affect important archaeological remains or their settings. b. Archaeological Priority Areas are identified on the Policies Map; all planning applications likely to affect important archaeological remains must be accompanied by an appropriate archaeological assessment. Archaeological assessments may be required for other development proposals where it is considered important archaeological remains may be present. c. There is a presumption in favour of physical preservation in situ of important archaeological remains. Where this cannot be achieved measures must be taken to mitigate the impact of proposals through archaeological fieldwork to investigate and record remains in advance of works, and subsequent analysis, publication and dissemination of the findings.
Explanation
7.176 The history of the Borough indicates that there is considerable likelihood that archaeological remains will be found in certain parts of the borough.
7.177 These areas are identified on the Policies Map as Areas of Archaeological Importance. Rotherham’s archaeological heritage has the potential to be an educational, recreational and tourist resource. The Council will therefore promote the conservation, protection or enhancement of archaeological sites and their presentation to the public. The Council will encourage suitable design land use and management to safeguard archaeological sites. The most important archaeological remains and their settings should be permanently preserved (if necessary for public access and display)
74 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.178 The Council will consult with, and be guided by, the South Yorkshire Archaeology Advisory Service on the archaeological implications of development proposals, especially within the Areas of Archaeological Importance and in the vicinity of known find locations.
Policy SP 47
Historic Parks, Gardens and Landscapes
The Council will seek to ensure the protection of the Borough’s historic parks and gardens. Development proposals should:
a. Demonstrate the preservation of the character and appearance and the setting of a historic park and garden; b. Encourage the conservation, restoration, maintenance and sympathetic management of historic parks and gardens and their wider landscape setting wherever possible; c. Seek where possible, to repair and conserve historic parks and gardens; d. Ensure applications for development within such areas are preceded by a Heritage Impact Assessment including a survey of the historic interest wherever appropriate.
Explanation
7.179 Historic parks and gardens are an important part of the Borough’s heritage and environment. They comprise a variety of features – the open space itself, views in and out, the planting, water features, built features and archaeological remains. There is therefore a need to protect historic parks and gardens and their wider landscape settings from new development, which would otherwise destroy or harm their historic interest and to encourage sympathetic management wherever possible. Five of the most important sites within the Borough have been included on the English Heritage 'Register of Historic Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in England' 1983. These are: a. Wentworth Woodhouse (Grade II*) b. Sandbeck Park and Roche Abbey (Grade II*) c. Moorgate Cemetery (Grade II) d. Clifton Park (Grade II) e. Boston Park (Grade II)
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 75 7
Policy SP 48
Locally Listed Buildings
The Council will seek to ensure and encourage the preservation and enhancement of Locally Listed Buildings and will use its powers where possible to protect their significance, character and setting, by the following means:
a. consent will not normally be granted for the demolition of Locally Listed Buildings;
b. alterations and extensions should be based on an accurate understanding of the significance of the asset including the structure, and respect the architectural character, and detailing of the original building. The structure, features, and materials of the building which contribute to its architectural and historic interest should be retained or restored with appropriate traditional materials and techniques;
c. any proposals should protect and enhance the setting of Locally Listed Buildings;
d. taking a practical approach towards the alteration of Locally Listed Buildings to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 and subsequent amendments, provided that the building’s special interest is not harmed, using English Heritage advice as a basis.
Explanation
7.180 For heritage assets not specifically addressed in policies above the council will identify them in plans and decision-making, and in Supplementary Planning Documents. When determining whether something is a heritage asset the council will assess its significance based on its aesthetic, communal, historic and evidential value. This heritage value will be used to decide the most efficient and effective way of managing the heritage asset to sustain its overall value to society. This approach is set out by English Heritage in Conservation Principles Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment (2008).
7.181 These are buildings, groups of buildings or structures of historic or architectural interest which have been identified as contributing significantly to the townscape but are not on the statutory list. However, these buildings are of considerable local importance.
7.182 The list of Locally Listed Buildings (LLB's) will be produced and maintained by the Council. An appraisal of the architectural or historic interest of a building, followed by a process of public consultation, should be undertaken before the designation of a new building of merit. The following criteria will be used for designation of LLB's
1. Any building or structure which dates from before 1840; 2. Later buildings or structures which are considered to be of definite quality and character, including the work of important architects or builders. Particular attention will be paid to buildings which:
76 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Have important historic associations, in terms of famous people or events; Illustrates an important aspect of social or economic history or use; Represent an exceptionally good example of a specific and distinctive architectural style; Demonstrate excellence in building craftsmanship, use of materials, technical innovation, architectural features and detailing; Form part of a distinctive and cohesive group of buildings; Retain its original architectural interest and integrity, and not subject to insensitive alterations; Have landmark quality or make a unique and positive contribution to the quality of the townscape or an open space.
7.183 The Council has control over the demolition of those Locally Listed Buildings which are in conservation areas, but elsewhere its powers are more limited. There will be a presumption against demolition of Locally Listed Buildings; both for townscape and sustainability reasons. However, should demolition prove necessary, a high standard of design, complementing the surrounding area, will be required in any replacement building.
7.184 Development proposals for alteration, extension or change of use to a Locally Listed Building or within its setting should protect the architectural integrity of the building, the existing balance between the building and its setting and be proportionate in scale to that of the original building. Architectural features, materials or detailing which contribute positively to the character of a Locally Listed Building, should be kept.
7.185 The Council will endeavour to protect the character and setting of Locally Listed Buildings by as far as possible treating proposals for works to or close to them, which would be visible from the street or any other place used by the public, as if they were Listed Buildings.
Policy SP 49
War Memorials
Where development proposals may impact upon the siting of war memorials, memorials should be retained in situ, if possible, or otherwise sensitively relocated following appropriate community consultation. Where demolition of structures which house war memorials is undertaken developers should first inform the Council of the presence of the war memorials.
7.186 The Council has recorded all Borough war memorials on a register. Some of these could be designated as Locally Listed Buildings, others are already part of the fabric of Statutory Listed Buildings. Some of these are in public places and others on private premises, such as those for companies. It is important to ensure that these significant features, and where appropriate their settings, are protected and restored where necessary. Whilst preservation in situ is the ideal option, as the location is often of significance to the memorial, should it need to be removed the Council will require a sensitive relocation. Alternative suitable locations for siting should be established following appropriate community consultation.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 77 7
7.187 In most cases planning permission for the demolition of buildings is not required, however the Council will need to approve how the demolition will be carried out (through a "prior approval application"). To ensure that war memorials can be recorded and re-sited where possible the Council will encourage notification of the presence of war memorials where buildings are proposed for demolition but where planning permission is not required.
Policy SP 50
Understanding and managing flood risk
The Council will expect proposals to:
a. demonstrate an understanding of the flood route of surface water flows throughout the proposed development in an extreme event and where the design flows for the drainage systems may be exceeded, and incorporate appropriate mitigation measures; and b. consider the possibility of providing flood resilience works and products for properties to minimise the risk of internal flooding to properties.
The Lead Local Flood Authority will introduce a Sustainable Urban Drainage Approval Body to approve drainage systems in new developments.
Explanation
7.188 In designing new development and any associated drainage systems the Council will expect applicants to demonstrate their understanding of surface water flows and where water flows will occur in extreme flood events. It will be important for applicants to understand where capacity of drainage systems may be exceeded. Applicants should take this information into account when designing development proposals, incorporating suitable mitigation measures where appropriate. The Council will also encourage design which improves the flood resilience of properties, helping to minimise the damage from flood water and reduce the time required to recover damaged buildings. Such measures could include the provision of barriers (such as door guards), water resistant door and window frames and waterproofing of plaster or stone flooring.
7.189 Applicants should be aware of the need to obtain approval from the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) for all works both temporary and permanent, that will affect an ordinary watercourse, or to obtain approval from the Environment Agency (EA) for all works both temporary and permanent, that will affect a main river.
7.190 The Flood and Water Management Act establishes the introduction of a Sustainable Urban Drainage Approval Body (SAB). Once introduced by the Lead Local Flood Authority all proposed Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDs) and control of surface water management for developments must be approved by the SAB before construction can commence.
78 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Delivery
7.191 Policy SP50 will be delivered through the determination of planning applications and applications for drainage approval. Where planning permission is required applications for drainage approval and planning permission can be lodged jointly with the planning authority but the SAB will determine the drainage application. The SAB will also be responsible for adopting and maintaining approved SuDS which serve more than one property.
Policy SP 51
Areas of Search for Mineral Extraction
Within Areas of Search identified on the Policies Map, planning permission for mineral extraction will normally be granted subject to the relevant environmental, working and restoration policies of the Local Plan. Planning permission for aggregate mineral extraction will only be granted outside identified Areas of Search where:
a. need is established and where the relevant Areas of Search have been investigated and have not proved viable, or b. prior extraction is proposed in advance of construction, in line with Core Strategy Policy CS26
Explanation
7.192 Areas of Search are intended to provide a reserve of minerals for the Plan period and, by identifying land where minerals are likely to exist, provide longer-term protection of resources. They indicate land which should be investigated to establish commercial viability and should be sufficiently large to accommodate uncertainties about mineral deposits and the intentions of landowners. There is a presumption against working outside these areas until they have first been investigated/exhausted. It is important to stress that the successful application of any “landbank” policy depends on the industry playing its part by the ready provision of information on reserves and production and by ensuring that proposals for development come forward at the right time.
Policy SP 52
Mineral Buffer Zones
In order to ensure that all mineral operations or waste disposal operations during restoration are not unnecessarily restricted, Buffer Zones will be provided around the Areas of Search and existing permitted workings. The Council will, within the Buffer Zones, seek to prevent non-minerals development which would affect the ability to carry out such operations or which would be adversely affected by them.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 79 7
Explanation
7.193 Areas of Search and existing permitted workings, require a Buffer Zone around them to restrict development which would affect the ability to quarry within them or suffer from a quarrying operation. In addition, mineral workings provide an opportunity for waste disposal either once extraction has ceased or, occasionally, as a concurrent operation to facilitate progressive restoration. Because waste disposal activities create similar environmental problems to those generated by mineral extraction, it will be necessary to retain Buffer Zones until a quarry has been restored to a permanent use.
80 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 53
Assessment of Mineral Extraction Proposals
Developers will be required to carry out development in accordance with an agreed scheme of working and restoration which will be approved as part of the grant of planning permission. Proposals for mineral working will be assessed with regard to the following considerations:
a. the effect on local amenity in terms of visual impact, blasting, dust, noise and other potential disturbance, taking into account any protective measures which are proposed,
b. the likely duration of working,
c. any adverse impact on biodiversity and geodiversity resources, ecological networks or features of importance for wildlife. Where it can be demonstrated that there are overriding benefits minerals development may be permitted subject to mitigation or compensation measures, including biodiversity creation and enhancement which must be put in place and managed,
d. the proposed final appearance and landform of the site. Proposals for new habitat creation and enhancement must have regards to priorities set out in the regional and local Biodiversity Action Plans and other appropriate strategies,
e. the effect on landscape, including Areas of High Landscape Value, attractive villages and Borough heritage sites,
f. the effect of working and restoration (especially where waste disposal is involved) on water resources, including pollution and possible disturbance to surface drainage and groundwater levels. It will be expected that waste disposal is evaluated as a mechanism for restoration and that it is adopted, wherever feasible and compatible with the intended after-use and environmental considerations,
g. the impact on the best and most versatile agricultural land. Where minerals development is proposed on such agricultural land involving restoration to agricultural use, the objective will be to restore this land to its previous agricultural quality or better if reasonably practical. Amenity or forestry may be appropriate alternatives to agricultural use, but in such cases restoration and aftercare steps should enable the retention of the land’s longer term potential as a high quality agriculture resource,
h. the amount of agricultural landtake, with release of land being restricted to that which is reasonably required for carrying out the working in accordance with the best existing techniques,
i. the suitability of restoration and aftercare proposals to return the development site to a beneficial after-use once working has ceased,
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 81 7
j. the effect on farm structure, the likely effectiveness of restoration proposals and the effect on agricultural productivity by reason of noise, dust or traffic disturbance, both of the land the subject of the proposal and adjoining agricultural land,
k. the effect which traffic generated by the proposal will have on road safety, property and the amenities of the people living in the vicinity of the development, or along the transportation routes likely to be used,
l. the availability or provision of adequate access to a suitable highway, and
m. the potential for non-road transport opportunities, the use of canal, rail, pipeline or conveyor facilities being encouraged in order to reduce disturbance caused by road traffic, wherever physical and economic factors permit.
7.194 Policy SP53 sets out the factors which will be considered when determining proposals for mineral extraction, seeking to balance the requirements of the industry and the local environment. As minerals can only be worked where they occur this can result in the establishment of a heavy industrial use in the countryside, with the consequent disturbance which it may represent.
7.195 Wherever possible, minerals should be obtained from sources outside Areas of High Landscape Value. However, economic haulage distances and the demand for particular mineral products will be taken into account where proposals are made within such areas. Mineral extraction need not be incompatible with Green Belt objectives provided that high environmental standards are maintained and that the site is well restored. Restoration and aftercare schemes will need to be agreed and resourced to ensure that, following extraction, land can be returned to its original characteristics. Consideration may be given to restoration schemes that provide for an alternate afteruse. Such cases will be considered on their merit having regard to relevant planning policies.
7.196 Minerals development should include or allow the recording of geodiversity resources during extraction to increase and maintain relevant environmental evidence.
7.197 The disposal of waste in quarries is desirable (where surface and ground water pollution control requirements of the Environment Agency can be met) in order to help restore mineral workings as well as to help solve the shortage of suitable sites for waste disposal. Disposal of appropriate waste materials will be expected to be evaluated and, where appropriate, included as an integral part of restoration proposals. Opencast coal development and tip washing schemes can create opportunities for engineered landfill space to be built into the scheme of restoration where amenity, environmental, site programming and traffic considerations can be accommodated.
7.198 There is a need to conserve the best and most versatile agricultural land; therefore, the working of minerals on land of lower rather than higher agricultural quality is to be preferred, followed generally by restoration to an agricultural after-use where this is considered appropriate . A detailed assessment of land quality is normally made when individual planning applications for extraction are submitted. Amenity or forestry afteruse may be an appropriate alternative to agricultural use, but where the best and most versatile agricultural land is involved the restoration and aftercare steps should enable the retention of its longer term potential as a high quality agricultural resource.
82 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.199 Mineral operations can be substantial generators of traffic, often in rural areas. In assessing applications to work minerals, the Council will consider such matters as vehicle routeing, access and wheel-washing provision. Adequate access to a suitable highway is necessary for mineral workings and the provision of rail and/ or canal transport facilities will be encouraged where these are available and provide a feasible alternative to road transport.
Policy SP 54
Safeguarding Mineral Infrastructure
Permission for non-minerals development involving, or in the vicinity of, safeguarded mineral infrastructure will be granted where it can be demonstrated that:
a. the infrastructure is no longer required or no longer meets the needs of the mineral or construction industry; or b. development will not prejudice the mineral infrastructure's operation or current or future use; or c. an alternative, appropriate, site provides capacity for delivery of the mineral infrastructure; or d. the need for the proposed development outweighs the need to safeguard the site for mineral infrastructure
7.200 As well as mineral resources, Government guidance also advocates the safeguarding of sites for the transportation of minerals by rail and water in order to ensure their availability, and facilities used for the processing of minerals for the manufacture of products from minerals, including facilities for concrete batching and coated roadstone.
7.201 Policy SP54 therefore sets out how proposals for non-minerals development involving, or in the vicinity of, safeguarded mineral infrastructure (as defined on the Policies Map) will be considered. Proposals will be supported where the infrastructure is no longer needed or does not meet the needs of the mineral or construction industry, or the proposed use will not prejudice the mineral infrastructure's operation. The assessment of proposals will also consider whether alternative sites provide capacity for the delivery of the mineral infrastructure and whether the need for the proposed development outweighs the need to safeguard the site for mineral infrastructure.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 83 7
7.6 Creating safe and sustainable communities
Policy SP 55
Pollution Control
Development proposals that are likely to cause pollution, or be exposed to pollution, will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that mitigation measures will minimise emissions to levels that protect health, environmental quality and amenity. When determining planning applications, particular consideration will be given to:
a. Any detrimental impact on the amenity of the local area, including whether there is an identified risk that public health may be affected b. the presence of noise generating uses close to the site, and the potential noise generated by the proposed development. Noise sensitive uses will not normally be acceptable adjacent to noisy transport uses. c. Whether there is a risk that any proposed development will lead to a breach of national air quality objectives or lead to a deterioration of local air quality d. any adverse effect on the quantity, quality and any important ecological features of water bodies and groundwater resources
Where the Council considers that an Air Quality Management Area may be affected by development, it will require the proposal to be consistent with the aims and objectives of the Council’s Air Quality Action Plan.
Development proposals that include artificial lighting which would cause unacceptable light pollution in the form of sky-glow, glare or intrusion onto other property and land will only be permitted if the Council is satisfied that adequate and reasonable controls can be put into place to protect dwellings and other sensitive property, the rural night-sky, observatories, road-users, and designated sites for conservation of biodiversity or protected species from the intrusive effects of the light pollution.
Explanation
7.202 Where development proposals have the potential to result in pollution of the environment, including at the demolition or construction phase, the Council will expect details of appropriate mitigation measures to be submitted with the planning application. Where necessary the Council will use planning conditions and/or legal agreements to help limit the impact of pollution.
7.203 The impact of existing sources of pollution should also be taken into account when locating new development. New development sensitive to pollution will not be appropriate where existing sources of noise or other pollution cannot be satisfactorily mitigated. New development will also not be appropriate where it would prejudice the viability of other important land uses by reason of its sensitivity to pollution. Residential development, for example, will not usually be appropriate in locations where the presence of residential uses is likely to give rise to the imposition of undue
84 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 operational constraints on existing safeguarded industrial uses that might prejudice their ability to continue operation.
7.204 The Council is concerned to ensure that all new development, particularly commercial, industrial and traffic generating uses, does not result in an unacceptable level of air pollution to the detriment of public health and other land uses. Developers will be expected to take proper account of air quality issues when drawing up their proposals. Within Air Quality Management Areas an air quality assessment will be required to be submitted with proposals for development. In addition, proposals for new development will be required to contribute to air quality improvement measures.
7.205 Development outside Air Quality Management Areas may also require an air quality assessment. The Council has produced an Air Quality Action Plan, and developers will be expected to take this into account when proposing development which could have an impact on air quality. Where proposals are acceptable mitigation measures may be secured through planning conditions and/or legal agreements.
7.206 Some uses are particularly sensitive to noise. For the purposes of this policy these are housing & residential institutions, educational establishments, care establishments such as hospitals and nursing homes, public buildings such as libraries and museums, places of worship, places of audience based recreation and offices research establishments.
7.207 Highways, railways and aircraft are a major source of noise nuisance. Noise generated may vary at different times, and there are maximum levels set out in government regulations that are considered to be reasonable. Measures can sometimes be incorporated into development to reduce noise to acceptable limits. Buildings can be sited away from the noise and constructed with materials that reduce noise.
7.208 Proposals for industrial development or other uses which have implications for generating noise will be assessed on their circumstances. Locational characteristics will be taken into account and consideration given to appropriate noise reduction. The applicant will be required to demonstrate that the development is constructed to a standard and/or incorporates noise reduction measures which will ensure that the resulting noise levels at specified locations will not exceed acceptable maximum levels.
7.209 In order to balance the requirements for security whilst protecting amenity and the environment generally, the Council will require that proposals for development include adequate information about floodlighting and other external lighting.
7.210 Planning conditions and/or legal agreements may be used to control the impact of pollution in relation to the proposed development or to the benefit of the wider community.
7.211 In all cases where development is likely to have a significant effect on the environment through the creation of pollution, developers will be expected to undertake an Environmental Impact Assessment. The types of development for which Environmental Impact Assessment may be required is listed in the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 and Circular 2/99 provides guidance on the procedures to be followed.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 85 7
Policy SP 56
Contaminated and Unstable Land
On land known to be or suspected of being contaminated, or where development may result in the release of contaminants from adjoining land, or where there are adverse ground conditions caused by unstable land, development will only be permitted where:
a. it can be demonstrated that there is no significant harm, or risk of significant harm, to human health or the environment or of pollution of any watercourse or ground water; b. any necessary remedial action is undertaken to safeguard users or occupiers of the site or neighbouring land and protect the environment and any buildings or services from contamination during development and in the future; c. It has been demonstrated that any adverse ground conditions have been properly identified and safely treated; d. It is demonstrated the land is made suitable for its current or proposed use.
Explanation
7.212 The Council wishes to encourage the full and effective use of land in an environmentally acceptable manner. Particularly where built development is involved, difficulties may occasionally arise where local geology and topography, frequently influenced by past industrial practices, for example mineral workings (especially underground coal mining), tipping and other made ground, and engineering activity, may have created situations of potential or actual ground instability, which need to be addressed to enable development to proceed.
7.213 Broad categories for the causes of instability include:
the effects of underground cavities; these may be of natural origin or due to mining or civil engineering works unstable slopes; these may be natural, in both coastal and inland situations; or manmade whether excavated, as in quarries or cuttings, or constructed, as in tips and embankments, ground compression; this may be of natural origin due to peat, alluvial, estuarine or marine soils; or due to human activities, e.g. made ground, landfill or restored opencast mines; and ground subject to movement due to shrinking and swelling clays.
7.214 Ground movements vary in intensity and extent and, therefore, in their effects on surface land use. Instability may occur whether or not there is any development on the surface. It is important to recognise that the development itself or the intensification of development may be the triggering factor which initiates instability problems.
7.215 Where a proposed development site is known or suspected of being contaminated, developers will be expected to provide a full assessment of the contamination and proposals for any necessary remediation work. Development will be permitted where it can be demonstrated that the contamination will not cause a threat to public health, safety or the environment following the implementation of remedial measures.
86 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.216 Where development is permitted which is likely on its cessation to leave its site or premises in a derelict, contaminated or unsightly state the Council may impose decommissioning and/or restoration conditions.
7.217 Where a site is affected by contamination or land stability issues, responsibility for securing a safe development rests with the developer and/or landowner.
Policy SP 57
Hazardous Installations
Development proposals which involve notifiable quantities of hazardous substances or which are in the vicinity of hazardous installations or other known hazards (in particular sensitive development which is likely to be exposed to hazardous processes or other potentially hazardous activities) will only be permitted if it can be demonstrated that:
a. the amount, type and location of hazardous substances would not pose adverse health and safety risks to the surrounding population and environment; and
b. any necessary measures would be put in place prior to development to protect public health and safety.
Explanation
7.218 There are a number of sites within the Borough which are identified as dangerous substance establishments by virtue of the quantities of hazardous substances present. Whilst they are subject to stringent controls under existing health and safety legislation, it is considered prudent to control the kinds of development permitted in the vicinity of these installations.
7.219 Where hazardous processes are carried out the implications extend beyond the boundaries of the site. The release of toxic chemicals or effects of an explosion could be serious not only for those working on the premises, but to the wider community living and working in the vicinity. It will not be appropriate for new development to be permitted which could result in significant numbers of people living, working or congregating close to hazardous installations.
7.220 Sensitive development such as housing, educational establishments, hospitals, places of worship and community facilities are generally considered to be incompatible with hazardous processes or activities. Some development within proximity to hazardous installations may be appropriate however, and in these circumstances the Council may use planning conditions and/or legal agreements to prevent or control risk to public safety.
7.221 Proposals related to hazardous industry will receive careful consideration by the Council in consultation with the Health and Safety Executive.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 87 7
Policy SP 58
Design
All forms of development are required to be of high quality, incorporate inclusive design principles and make a positive contribution to the local character and distinctiveness of an area. Permission will be refused for development of poor design that fails to take the opportunities available for improving the character and area and the way it functions. This policy applies to all new developments including alterations and extensions to existing buildings.
For a development proposal to be acceptable it is required to respect the following principles:
the setting of the site, including the scale, mass, form, and grain of surrounding development, local building materials and colour, and architectural detailing; the creation of visually attractive developments as a result of good high quality built forms and spaces, including the use appropriate materials and landscaping and utilisation of natural features, such as topography, watercourses, trees, boundary treatments, planting and biodiversity; reinforcing and complementing local distinctiveness and creating a positive sense of place, including the use of public art where appropriate. the use of architectural detailing and better quality materials on prominent parts of buildings to reduce the scale of bulky buildings and large bland elevations the legibility and permeability of development which should promote ease of movement, the creation of safe and accessible environments and provide clear distinction between public and private spaces; the durability of development and capability of adaptation over time, including adaptation to, and mitigation of, the effects of climate change; establish satisfactory arrangements for the storage and collection of refuse, recyclable materials and garden waste the appropriate mitigation of site constraints to avoid any detriment to amenity or the satisfactory operation of adjoining land.
Explanation
7.222 Policy SP58 sets out the overarching elements of architectural and urban design that need to be satisfied for high quality sustainable development to be achieved. These elements will be applicable to the majority of development, however the scale and nature of a development will determine the relevance of particular aspects. Compliance with Policy SP58 will demonstrate that the site and its context has been sufficiently analysed and understood during the design process and that this knowledge has been used in the proposed design of the development.
7.223 The context (setting) of a site or area needs to be analysed and understood so that it informs the design of development that appropriately maintains and enhance the location’s sense of place. This will be achieved by development that complements and builds further coherence into the positive features of Rotherham's locally distinct patterns of development, land use and communities,
88 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 which help form its character. The use of public art will be encouraged, and the merits of such provision will be considered on a case by case basis. Public art provision should be considered at the outset to ensure that local communities have an opportunity to contribute to and influence their public realm through this medium.
7.224 Developments with outstanding or innovative design that help raise the standard of design more generally in the area will generally be supported, providing they also comply with all other relevant policies in this document.
7.225 The design and layout of buildings must enable sufficient sunlight and daylight to penetrate into and between buildings, and ensure that adjoining land or properties are protected from unacceptable overshadowing. The Building Research Establishment (BRE) provides good practice guidance in "Site Layout Planning for Daylight and Sunlight: a guide to good practice" (BRE, 2011.)
7.226 Legible developments are easily understood by their users - they help people to find their way around both the development and the wider area, and to understand how a place works and its function. Developments that promote a successful relationship between public and privates spaces have clear public fronts and private backs of buildings, they give a clear indication of ownership and management responsibility for these spaces.
7.227 In general it is desirable to have a level of permeability that offers a variety of attractive, convenient and safe routes through an area. However, if an area is too permeable it can have its own problems - it can lead to underused routes which attract crime and anti-social behaviour and make moving through an area difficult and confusing. Car parking spaces should be well defined and integrated with good quality surfacing materials and landscaping within the public realm whilst not letting parking dominate the environment.
7.228 Landscape design is not something that can be considered after a building has been designed or built, it is integral to the design and functioning of the whole development and wider area. The landscape and buildings need to be considered together from the start of the design process.
7.229 Developments are encouraged to meet the principles set out in "Safer Places" (ODPM/Home Office, 2004) and "Secured by Design". Waste storage and recycling facilities should be integrated into new developments, in locations within the site that are accessible to all. Development of a site will also be expected to take place with separate systems of foul and surface water drainage discharging to appropriate outfalls.
7.230 Development proposals will be required to demonstrate that they have appropriately taken into account and mitigated against any site constraints which may have a detrimental impact upon amenity. This may include issues such as privacy, direct sunlight or daylight.
7.231 Pylons and cables inevitably have an impact on the visual amenity of their surroundings. Recognising the access and safety considerations of these installations and the proximity of development to them will be dependent upon a combination of factors including the development concerned, the type of line that is nearby and the topography of the land where the development is proposed.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 89 7
7.232 Other considerations include those that do not relate to amenity, but to operations on adjoining sites such as impacts on renewable or low carbon energy supply, i.e. by detrimentally overshadowing solar panels. Where negative impacts are identified, the design should be modified where possible, to avoid adverse impacts.
7.233 Further guidance on design matters is provided in the South Yorkshire Residential Design Guide (with consideration being given to this being adopted, all or in part, as a Supplementary Planning Document). SPD's will also be created for Householder Development (Extensions) and Backland & Tandem Development.
7.234 Where Design and Access Statements are required to accompany planning applications the level of detail provided in the statement should relate to the scale and complexity of the proposal.
90 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Policy SP 59
Housing Standards
1 Housing Development
All new housing developments (including changes of use, houses in multiple occupation, and sheltered housing) are required to provide accommodation that meets the following criteria:
a. Accommodation of adequate size, with acceptable shape and layout of rooms for the intended purpose (with due consideration to aspect, outlook from habitable rooms, noise, ventilation, privacy, light); b. Functional and useable space that has good provision for play, amenity and garden space; c. Sufficient space for storage and utility purposes; d. Circulation space is designed to facilitate its intended function; e. Built to be accessible and adaptable to meet changing occupier circumstances over the lifetime of the development; and f. Eligible for attainment of a Building for Life award;
Additionally for apartment developments:
g. Avoiding access paths against ground floor windows; h. Ensuring amenity space is secured and directly accessed through the building; and i. Create inviting entrances with access not dominated by motor vehicles.
2 Car Parking Layout
In terms of car parking, residential layouts must be designed to:
a. Reduce the visual impacts of parking on the street-scene and provide defined visitor parking on-street; b. Discourage the obstruction of footways by kerb parking, and parking that compromises the operation of the highway; and c. Ensure in-curtilage/on plot parking does not result in streets dominated by parking platforms to the front of the property or large expanses of garage doors at street level.
Explanation
7.235 New homes need to be built to be accessible and adaptable to meet changing circumstances over a person's lifetime, in developments that are attractive to, and safe for, all. Homes that can adapt to change as new occupants move in, families grow, and occupants age or experience ill health, are at the heart of the South Yorkshire Residential Design Guide. Flexible and adaptable housing design reduces unwanted moves and allows sustainable communities to develop. It can also avoid unsightly adaptations and extensions to accommodation and costly ancillary aids and services. Accordingly schemes should perform well against all sections of Building for Life (so as to be eligible for a Building for Life award) and any issues arising should be highlighted early on and resolved.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 91 7
7.236 In order to protect the living conditions and well-being of future occupants, applications for residential development must demonstrate how the proposed accommodation is functionally fit for purpose and has been designed to meet the specific needs of the occupants. It should demonstrate how the accommodation is large enough to provide sufficient space for privacy, socialising, studying, cooking, dining, sleeping, washing and storage of household goods and belongings. All dwelling units should have convenient access to adequate private or communal amenity space and benefit from good levels of day lighting, privacy and security.
7.237 The usefulness of a room can depend as much on design as on its size. Therefore, to ensure that rooms function comfortably and efficiently for their intended purpose, their shape, position and dimensions of doors and windows, natural lighting and ventilation will also be taken into account.
7.238 Homes should have sufficient activity, storage and circulation space to provide for the needs of all potential occupants and their visitors. Dwelling plans should demonstrate that suitable space is provided for standard-sized furniture, a washing machine, drying clothes, and for waste and recycling bins within the home.
7.239 Those details not evident on the dwelling plan are required to be detailed in the Design and Access Statement and relevant schedule of accommodation (for example, details such as level entry showers and the route for ceiling mounted hoists). The number of occupants each home is designed to accommodate should be made clear, in order for the standards to be verified.
7.240 Garages and integral garages are often not used for their intended purpose due to a lack of storage provision, inadequate sized garages/doors and a trend towards increasingly large vehicles. This places additional pressure on parking in the public realm and can result in the loss of front gardens as these are paved over. Therefore, integral or standalone garages will not be counted as a parking space unless they are an adequate size (currently 3x6 metres minimum clear internal dimensions).
7.241 The council acknowledges that there may be some conflict between meeting standards and sympathetically converting or adapting historic buildings, or the extent of adaptation required to the existing fabric may not be viably achievable in some minor developments. In such instances design proposals should ensure that the most appropriate balance is achieved and applications will be considered on their merits.
Policy SP 60
Sustainable Construction
a. The use of renewable and recycled materials during construction and the provision for the recycling of construction, demolition and excavation wastes will be encouraged in all development b. New homes will be required to meet or exceed requirements of the Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4 (rising through to Level 6 within the lifetime of the plan in accordance with national regulations). c. New non-residential buildings over 1000sqm will be required to meet the relevant BREEAM ‘very good’ standards.
92 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Explanation
7.242 All new buildings should be built to a standard which minimises the consumption of resources during construction and thereafter in its occupation.
7.243 In order to be sustainable, durable and adaptable, developments must be designed for the long-term and use the minimum necessary amount of resources over their lifetime. The materials used and building design will enable the development to be easily maintained and altered for different uses and respond to the different needs of its users.
7.244 To achieve the highest standards of sustainable construction a number of measures could be employed such as: incorporation of energy efficient passive solar design, use of environmentally friendly construction materials and avoidance of materials with a high embodied energy. Two useful reference guides are the nationally recognised "Green Guide to Specification" (BRE) and "GreenSpec".
7.245 All new proposals will need to be designed to withstand and adapt to the predicted impacts of climate change such as high temperatures, increased risks of flash flooding and changing ground conditions, to ensure that the building is practical and comfortable for all users during its lifespan. This could include the use of measures such as the installation of green roofs and grey water recycling, and materials which reduce heat gain in summer and maximise natural ventilation.
7.246 Relevant design and technological measures enabling proposals to realise their full potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and adapt to climate change should be incorporated in the early design stage. Consequently, developments must achieve as a minimum the carbon compliance figures stated in Core Strategy Policy CS30. It is expected that efficiency measures will be prioritised as a means towards meeting these targets. These requirements may be adjusted in future years to take into account the then prevailing standards and any other national guidance to ensure the standards are met or exceeded.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 93 7
Policy SP 61
Shop Front Design
The Council will seek the highest standards in the control of shop frontage and sign detailing by requiring new or replacement shop fronts to be designed so that:
a. they respect the character of the whole building and the overall character of the street scene; b. they respect the period and style of the building in terms of proportion and quality of materials and relate well to neighbouring properties; c. the use of transparent glazing is maximised on all windows and doors, including upper floors where they are in use; d. signage and security precautions do not exceed what is reasonably necessary to advertise the business and give protection against burglary and vandalism respectively; e. where shutters are required, their design and location do not obstruct any architectural features on the building or have an adverse environmental impact, and any external shutters are perforated and painted with the shutter box sited behind the fascia; f. wherever possible illumination of shop signs are external rather than in the form of internally illuminated box signs, and any canopies should be incorporated within the overall design; g. in general, door recesses should not be deeper than 600mm.
An existing shop front which contributes to the character of a building or area should be retained and refurbished rather than replaced. Any original features such as pilasters and fascias that have been concealed by later additions should be exposed and restored in order to enhance the appearance of the shop front.
Explanation
7.247 The Council is committed to creating centres and shopping environments that are welcoming and attractive, projecting an image of quality and friendliness. The design of shop fronts has a major role to play in creating such quality environments. They are designed to attract attention, but this needs to be done sympathetically to the building upon which they are imposed and to the streetscene in general. The promotion of good shopfront and advertisement design is therefore seen as essential.
7.248 It is important that shop fronts should not compromise the local character, scale and architectural quality of individual buildings. The Council is keen to encourage both the provision of contemporary designs with flair and the reinstatement of historic shop fronts. Where an existing shopfront contributes to the character of a building or area the Council considers that this should be retained and refurbished in preference to being replaced, with original features being exposed and restored.
7.249 Policy SP61 sets out how we will assess proposals for new or replacement shop fronts to secure improvements to the visual quality of shop frontages and promote good shop front design
94 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 that celebrates the character and architectural detailing of the original buildings to improve the townscape, which will benefit all the traders and the community as a whole.
7.250 Transparent glazing used wherever possible in doors and windows can assist in presenting an active and attractive street frontage. Whilst it is acknowledged that signage and security measures will be required in shopfronts, we will encourage these to be limited to that which is reasonably necessary. Excessive use of signage or security can be detrimental to the setting of the overall character of the building and to the wider frontage. In this respect the policy sets out our requirements for the design and location of shutters, illuminated shop signs and canopies.
7.251 Building Regulations require doorways and entrances to be accessible to people with disabilities. Whilst door recesses can help provide variety and interest to a shopfront these can become detrimental to access and to the buildings character when they are too deep. Therefore in general door recesses should not be deeper than 600mm.
7.252 The Council has produced a shop front design guide to encourage good quality design. Further work will be undertaken to update this guide and adopt it as a Supplementary Planning Document.
Policy SP 62
Advertisements
Advertisements are required to be of the highest possible standard and contribute to a safe and attractive environment.
Advertisements (including hoardings, illumination of hoardings, illuminated fascia signs, free-standing display panels, and estate agent boards) which require consent must not cause a public safety hazard or contribute to clutter or a loss of amenity. Proposals for advertisements will be supported where they:
a. are of a high quality and sensitive to their visual appearance in relation to their size and siting (including the building or structure on which they are to be sited) and the surrounding street scene, especially in the case of listed buildings and conservation areas; and b. do not contribute to an unsightly proliferation or clutter of signage in the vicinity; and c. do not cause a hazard to pedestrians or road users; and d. do not cause visual intrusion by virtue of light pollution into adjoining residential properties and avoid light pollution of nearby wildlife habitats; and e. do not have flashing internal or external illumination.
Explanation
7.253 The term "advertisement" covers a very wide range of advertisements and signs. Some advertisements are not regulated by the council and others benefit from "deemed consent", which means permission is not needed; this will depend on the size, position and illumination of the advert.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 95 7
Others advertisements will always need consent. For more information refer to the Control of Advertisements Regulations.
7.254 Poorly sited or badly designed advertisements and signs can have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of areas and may raise issues of public safety. This can include projecting signs and illuminations, particularly flashing illuminations. When deciding applications for advertisements the council can have regard to considerations of amenity and public safety, as well as the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007. Policy SP62 sets the criteria by which amenity and public safety will be assessed in Rotherham in relation to advertisements.
Policy SP 63
Telecommunications
Proposals for the installation of telecommunications equipment will be permitted where it can be demonstrated that:
a. There is no significant adverse effect on the external appearance of the building on which, or space in which, they are located; b. The development would not have an unacceptable effect on areas of ecological interest, areas of landscape importance, archaeological sites, conservation areas or buildings of architectural or historical interest; c. The possibility of sharing facilities, such as masts, cabinet boxes and satellite dishes, and erecting antennae on existing buildings or other structures has been fully explored and where practical becomes the preferred location; d. Technologies to miniaturise and camouflage any telecommunications apparatus have been explored; e. They are appropriately designed, coloured and landscaped to take account of their setting; and f. There is no unacceptable adverse impact on the visual amenities of neighbouring occupiers.
Explanation
7.255 With demand for new telecommunications continuing to grow, the Council are keen to facilitate this expansion whilst at the same time minimising any environmental impacts. In particular, the Council will seek to ensure that the development of modern telecommunications equipment is sympathetic to Rotherham’s townscape and countryside. The aim is to ensure that telecommunications equipment is kept to a minimum through encouraging the sharing of existing facilities and/or proposed where this is technically possible. Proposals will not be supported where there is an unacceptable visual impact upon neighbouring occupiers, particularly within residential areas. The visual impact of telecommunications equipment can be minimised through careful design, placement, colouring and landscaping. Proposals should not be located in an area of high visibility, or be overlooked by housing. In addition, using available technologies to miniaturise and camouflage apparatus can also contribute
96 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 to reducing any visual intrusion. This will help to protect the character of an area and the appearance of property.
7.256 The policy applies to planning applications or prior notification applications for the installation of satellite dishes, microwave antennae, radio masts, cabinet boxes and other types of telecommunications apparatus which require planning permission. When considering such applications the council will also have regard to the legal requirements placed upon telecommunications operators to provide an adequate service, and any technical and operational constraints that may be faced.
Policy SP 64
Safeguarding Community Facilities
Those areas allocated on the Policies Map for Community Facilities will, wherever possible, be retained or developed for such purposes. In addition, land or buildings currently used or last used for community purposes, but not identified as such on the Policies Map will be similarly safeguarded wherever possible. Development proposals which involve the loss of key community facilities shall only be permitted where the local planning authority is satisfied that the retention of the land or building in community use is no longer viable, or where adequate alternative provision has been made or where some other overriding public benefit will result from the loss of the facility.
Explanation
7.257 Community facilities and services play an essential role in the quality of life of the borough’s residents and visitors, helping reduce car use contributing towards the creation of sustainable communities. These can take many forms and the demand for which will vary in response to the demographic and economic changes in society and the needs of different groups in the community. This Policy is included to retain and ensure an adequate distribution of community facilities within the borough.
7.258 Commercial opportunism may often lead to pressure to displace community uses in favour of more profitable forms of development. This can be damaging to the interests of the local community dependent on such facilities. It may be particularly damaging for rural communities where key village services are lost. Consequently, the Council will seek to prevent the loss of such community facilities to other forms of development, unless alternative provision is made or it is clear that there is insufficient demand to warrant their retention.
7.259 Such services may include, but are not limited to, churches, chapels, schools, village halls, local shops including post offices, public houses, doctors surgeries, social clubs, banks or cash points etc.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 97 7
Loss of Public Houses
Policy SP 65
Loss of Public Houses
The Council will not permit the redevelopment or change of use of public houses to other uses except where:
a. It is demonstrated that the public house is no longer economically viable; b. Reasonable attempts have been made to market the site as a public house; c. Another community-based facility is proposed as part of any re-development in line with Policy SP64; and d. There is at least one alternative public house in the local area within reasonable walking distance.
Explanation
7.260 The Borough has experienced the loss of a number of public houses in recent times, usually through redevelopment as public houses continue to face challenging trading conditions. Public house sites can bring communities together, promoting social cohesion and integration and is considered an important element in maintaining vitality and vibrancy within the area. It is acknowledged that it is possible to use permitted development rights contained in the Use Classes Order to change the use of a pub to a restaurant/café (Class A3), financial or professional services office (Class A2) or retail shop (Class A1). However where planning permission is required for redevelopment or a change of use Policy SP65 introduces a presumption against the loss of public houses unless future proposals can demonstrate that the criteria within policy has been fulfilled.
7.261 The policy seeks to ensure that pubs play a role within the local community and are retained to continue to provide such a role. Public houses are considered to be an established part of community life and can play an important social role, offering residents a meeting place for food, drink, entertainment and functions. However, where pubs are no longer economically viable or do not provide an important community function, alternative uses of the site may be considered.
7.262 Evidence will need to be submitted and this should include evidence of the appointment of a property consultant / estate agent to handle the marketing of the property and records of where and how the property has been marketed for a minimum of 12 months.
7.263 Development involving the loss of a public house may be acceptable where there is alternative access within the local area to at least one public house. For the purposes of this policy reasonable walking distance is normally defined as 800 metres, measured from the site of the proposed development, taking into account barriers such as main roads, rivers and railway lines. It is recognised that flexibility will be required in certain circumstances; therefore walking distances may be shortened (for example where locations are particularly steep) or lengthened (for example in rural locations and green belt villages) where appropriate.
98 Sites and Policies Draft 2013
Policy SP 66
Access to Community Facilities
Residential development should have good access to a range of shops and services. On larger scale residential developments of 10 or more dwellings the majority of homes should be within reasonable walking distance via safe pedestrian access of a local convenience shop and a reasonable range of other services or community facilities. This may require the provision of local services or facilities by developers where these requirements would not otherwise be met or where new development would place an unacceptable burden upon existing facilities, unless it can be demonstrated that such provision would not be viable or would threaten the viability of the overall scheme.
Explanation
7.264 Access to a local convenience shop is considered vital to ensure that communities have access to every day essential items. Communities should also have access to a reasonable range of other local facilities and services. These include, but are not limited to, other shops, banking facilities, public houses, libraries, hospitals, schools, health care surgeries, places of worship, nurseries, day care provision, indoor and outdoor recreation, cultural and leisure facilities, youth centres, village halls and emergency service buildings. Other types of facilities which offer benefits to the community will be considered on their merits.
7.265 On new housing developments of 10 or more dwellings we will expect the majority of dwellings (ie 80%) to be within reasonable walking distance of a local convenience store, and a reasonable range of other local facilities. Access should be via a safe pedestrian route. For the purposes of this policy reasonable walking distance will be 800m from the centre of the site, taking into account barriers such as main roads, rivers and railway lines. It is recognised that flexibility will be required in certain circumstances; therefore walking distances may be shortened (for example where sites are particularly steep or the facility would serve older or disabled people) or lengthened (for example in rural locations and green belt villages) where appropriate.
7.266 Where development proposals would otherwise not meet the requirements of this policy the Council may require the provision of local services or facilities. This could be in the form of shop units to provide for local needs, or other facilities as appropriate to that community. New developments not only create demands for new infrastructure but also impact upon wider community and civic provision. For example, a large new housing development may place a burden on the capacity of existing shops, schools, nurseries, libraries, and social services or may exacerbate a situation where an under-provision already exists in the area. Provision of, or a contribution towards new or improved facilities may therefore be sought where development would place an unacceptable burden upon existing facilities. It is acknowledged that in some circumstances such provision may not be viable or may threaten the viability of the overall scheme. In such cases the Council will require that developers provide suitable, robust evidence to demonstrate that this is the case. This should include appropriate viability assessments, which should adopt an 'open-book' approach.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 99 7
Policy SP 67
Including Renewable Energy in Developments
There is significant potential in Rotherham to exploit building integrated renewable and low carbon energy technologies. The council encourages the installation of the following suitable
technologies on new and existing developments in order to off-set CO2 emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
The following installed technologies would be suitable for deployment in Rotherham:
solar thermal; solar photovoltaic; biomass boilers; air and ground source heat pumps; and roof mounted wind turbines
All new developments will be encouraged to incorporate infrastructure that could connect to any existing or future planned Combined Heat and Power district heating networks.
Developments will be permitted where they are sympathetically designed and located taking account of Part 4 of CS30. Particular regard should be given to visual impact in cases involving development of listed buildings, development within conservation areas, or development involving other heritage assets.
Large and Medium Scale Wind
Large (over 500kw) and medium scale wind energy (50 to 500kw) is a significant potential source of renewable energy in Rotherham. Large and medium wind energy schemes will be permitted where:
a. There are no significant adverse or cumulative impacts upon:
i. landscape, townscape and historic features; and ii. biodiversity, geodiversity and water quality; and iii. the amenities of nearby residents by way of noise and shadow flicker; or
b. The wider environmental, economic, social and community benefits directly related to the scheme outweigh any potentially adverse impacts.
Proposals must include an assessment of the environmental, economic and social impacts and include measures to mitigate any adverse impacts arising from installation, operation, maintenance, decommissioning and site restoration. Planning permission will not be granted if the council considers the proposed mitigation to be insufficient.
100 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Explanation
7.267 The Rotherham Renewable and Low Carbon Energy study (2011) provides a resource assessment for various technologies in Rotherham and provides the evidence base to inform this policy. By far the largest potential for delivery lies with large scale and particularly medium scale wind. In essence, they offer over half the potential resource across all technologies. Medium scale wind in particular can easily become part of operational life and integrated satisfactorily in to most farms, warehouse and mixed business sites including commercial operations like office parks and supermarkets, even schools. Solar photovoltaics and Thermal can also offer substantial opportunity. There is potential that energy crops can become a significant resource as part of an integrated biomass energy programme. However, a balance must be achieved between the cultivation of crops for energy and cultivation of crops for food/ livestock due to the importance of agricultural output. Large mixed-use developments may be able to benefit from district heating and combined heat and power or wind turbines whilst smaller developments may not have high enough demand or the land area to accommodate these technologies, however building integrated technologies could provide significant CO2 savings for these buildings.
7.268 The mapped distribution of the renewable energy resource in Rotherham is given in the Energy Opportunity Plan in the Rotherham Renewable and Low Carbon Energy study.
7.269 Renewable resources can be used to supply Combined Heat and Power Schemes (CHP) to serve groups of properties, existing or new, including housing schemes. In determining whether a development is suitable to connect to a decentralised energy network or to include combine cooling, heat and power, the Council will consider the heat demand of the development and its proximity to a decentralised energy network as well as the feasibility and viability of connecting or including plant equipment. The Council will apply a general presumption that where the opportunity exists to generate heat on-site or to connect to a district energy network, the latter will be sought in all cases unless it can be demonstrated that a significantly greater reduction in carbon emissions can be achieved by generating heat on-site, or connection to a network will have an adverse impact on the operation of the network. Proposals for the creation of new Combined Heat & Power Schemes will also be looked upon favourably subject to sympathetic design and location.
7.270 The heat mapping exercise identified several high density heat loads that are potentially exploitable for retrofitting district heating/CHP schemes. Potential candidate sites include:
Wath Upon Dearne – area around Beech Road, Avenue Road and Sandymount Road. Holmes, Rotherham – area around Hartington Road, Cavendish Road, Josephine Road and Belmount Street St Ann’s, Rotherham – RMBC Leisure Centre and housing to the east Moorgate, Rotherham – Rotherham District General Hospital and adjacent housing Rawmarsh – Goosebutt Street, Netherfield Lane and Spalton Road. Locations along Bawtry Road, Bramley,
7.271 This policy is intended to apply to all renewable energy technologies. Such technologies can be used at different scales ranging from those which contribute to the national grid, to micro-generation schemes which serve one property.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 101 7
7.272 The Council will support renewable energy proposals unless they would have unacceptable adverse effects which are not outweighed by the local and wider environmental, economic and social benefits of the development taking account of Core Strategy Policy CS30. This includes wider benefits arising from a clean, secure energy supply, reductions in greenhouse gases and other polluting emissions; and contributions towards meeting Rotherham’s target for use of renewable energy sources.
7.273 Large and medium scale wind energy schemes have particular potential within Rotherham, and the policy sets out the considerations which will be taken into account when assessing proposals for development. Community owned energy generation, including medium scale wind, has an important
role to play in reducing CO2 emissions and increasing total installed renewable and low carbon energy capacity. Proposals from standalone or ‘onsite’ community-led medium scale wind projects will be viewed favourably provided the factors set out in Policy SP67 are suitably addressed. Wind may also be able to contribute toward local energy security through its use in decentralised or non-grid connected energy.
7.274 Energy from waste proposals will be considered against the policies set out in the Joint Waste Plan.
Policy SP 68
Allowable Solutions
In accordance with Core Strategy Policy CS30 and to facilitate the Government’s aim of promoting sustainable design and achieving Zero Carbon development, from 2016 for residential development and 2019 for non-residential developments, the Local Planning Authority will require financial contributions from developers to off-set remaining carbon demands of development to achieve a 100% improvement over Part L of Building Regulations (2010) after all reasonable, technically feasible and economically viable measures have been utilised to minimise emissions from all development.
Prior to these dates, where developers can demonstrate that the attainment of targets specified in CS32 are not technically feasible or economically viable, the Council will seek a financial contribution to off-set the identified short fall. This will be calculated on the basis an adopted price per tonne of carbon required to address any short fall.
Explanation
7.275 The targets set are very challenging, particularly for energy thirsty non-domestic development. The construction industry will require a step change that departs radically from current building practice. However, it is recognised by government and industry experts that construction practice may be unable to keep pace with the ambitious targets imposed on developments to cut emissions and hence a degree of flexibility must be applied to achieve the strategic objectives, but also reflect technical and economic limitations of the development site.
102 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 7.276 Whilst the principles of the energy hierarchy must be observed and the vast majority of savings will still be required on-site, provision has been made to secure cash-in-lieu contributions where it is clearly demonstrated that the specific targets cannot be fully achieved on site, any shortfall may be provided off-site.
7.277 Any funds captured will be ringfenced and spent only on local measures that provide real and measurable reductions in carbon emissions. These can include, but are not limited to:
Retrofitting existing housing stock to be more energy efficient Communal heating and CHP Decentralised energy networks Micro renewable energy generation Upgrading existing building stock Upgrading energy consuming infrastructure (street lighting, electric vehicle charging points) Potential landscape improvements where carbon benefits can be identified (tree planting etc)
Development Within Mixed Use Areas
Policy SP 69
Development Within Mixed Use Areas
In Mixed Use Areas, as defined on the Policies Map, new development or change of use will be permitted provided that it complies with the menu of acceptable uses for that area as set out in table x and meets the requirements of other planning policy as appropriate. Proposals for uses not identified in table x will be considered on their merits.
7.278 Table of mixed use areas and acceptable uses to be inserted in final document.
Explanation
7.279 Whilst each Mixed Use Area is unique in terms of its character, mix of uses and other planning requirements, it is possible to describe, in general terms, the types of uses which are appropriate for each location. Policy SP69 establishes that proposals for appropriate uses will be supported where they comply with menu of appropriate uses set out in table x and the requirements of other relevant planning policy.
7.280 Within Mixed Use Areas it is unnecessary to prescribe or precisely delineate the areas of land appropriate to each particular land-use. This flexibility allows attractive, imaginative and viable schemes to be developed. In line with other planning policy uses within Mixed Use Areas should be complementary and not result in conflict of land uses. Design and layout should address the needs of all proposed uses and provide a good standard of amenity for all existing and future occupants. Where other uses not identified as acceptable as proposed within Mixed Use Areas they will be considered on their merits.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 103 1
1 Proposed Development Sites in Rotherham Urban Area
1.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
1.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Rotherham Urban Area:
Table 2
Position in Core Strategy Main Location for New Growth Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy The Rotherham Urban Area will be identified as the main (Core Strategy Policy CS1, location for new housing and employment growth. Table 1) Rotherham Town Centre will be the principal focus for new retail and leisure floorspace. More localised retail and service floorspace is available at Parkgate and Rawmarsh. Rotherham Town Centre has a train station linking Sheffield in the west and Doncaster, Leeds in the north. There is also a public transport interchange connecting to much of the rest of the Borough and the wider City Region. There are significant employment opportunities in the urban area, a college of further education, a hospital and new NHS walk-in centre.
Bassingthorpe Farm, in close proximity to Rotherham Town Centre and to neighbourhood services and facilities provided in Greasborough and Kimberworth, will be developed as an extension to Rotherham urban area. New development will integrate with existing communities. Supporting infrastructure, including a new local centre if required, will be provided as necessary to meet the needs of the emerging community and to ensure that existing provision is not working beyond its capacity.
Current Size of settlement 43.8% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New Total : 5,450 - 38% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough (1,700 - 12% at Bassingthorpe Farm) Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, (3,750 - 26% - Rest of Rotherham Urban Area) Table 1)
104 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Target Amount of New Total 61 hectares - 34% Employment Land (2013-2028) and (11 hectares - 6% at Bassingthorpe Farm) Percentage of Borough Total (50 hectares- 28% - Rest of Rotherham Urban Area) (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Rotherham Town Centre - Principal Town Centre Retail Hierarchy Parkgate - District Centre (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Rawmarsh - Local Centre Table 1) Bassingthorpe Farm - Local Centre Core Strategy Retail Rotherham Town Centre - Maintain and enhance role as Strategy for Settlement the principle town centre (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Parkgate - Maintain the quality and range of retail service Table 1) uses, improve comparison goods provision Rawmarsh - Encourage developments which improve comparison goods and service facilities provision and reduce vacancies.
1.2 Settlement Profile
Settlement Characteristics
1.2 North West Rotherham
Diverse character ranging from older areas closer to the town centre, where there is a mix of predominantly terraced housing and some employment uses, to the more suburban character of more outlying areas, with a mix of Council built and privately developed housing. Many parts of the area are characterised by large areas of open space, including broad green margins to the highways with scope for development through rationalisation. Many areas benefit from good public transport services, with areas closest to the Town Centre having good access to Rotherham Central Railway Station. Masbrough is a key “gateway” linking its surrounding neighbourhoods with the Town Centre. Good access to the strategic Highway network. Opportunities for structural and qualitative change in and around Masbrough which could improve the perceptions of the area, create a new focus for the area and provide opportunities for local retail. Centenary Riverside nature park & Blackburn Meadows. Close proximity to Wentworth Woodhouse, associated deer park and Repton designed landscape. Grange Park golf course is located near-by.
1.3 Rawmarsh/Parkgate
Strong Relationship with Rotherham, Doncaster and surrounding settlements via good transport links, but A633 connection to Rotherham is congested at peak times.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 105 1
Frequent circular bus service linking Rotherham to the residential areas of Rawmarsh. Two defined town centres: Bellows Shopping Centre (scheduled for redevelopment) and Rawmarsh Hill. There are also local shopping areas at The Parade, Monkwood Road, Kilnhurst Road and Clay Pit Lane. Employment Opportunities are reasonable given the number of schools, the two centres and Parkgate Industrial Area. However the majority of opportunities lie adjoining and just outside of the settlement. Unemployment and deprivation levels are significantly above the Borough average. A Local Wildlife Site is found at the New Stubbin Colliery Site & Incline.
1.4 Aldwarke
Predominantly Industrial Area. Parkgate Retail World, the Barbot Hall industrial estate and a further area of significant retail warehousing (at Great Eastern Way) lie to the west whilst the north eastern area is dominated by the Aldwarke Steelworks. Retail World includes a significant variety of high street shops and a major supermarket. Dependent on many of the facilities and services found in Rotherham Town Centre. Local shopping facilities are available along the A630 at Eastwood and Dalton but these are in need of qualitative improvement. St. Ann’s leisure centre (on the A633) opened November 2008. The residential areas form some of the most deprived in the Borough.
1.5 Thrybergh & East Rotherham
Reasonable access to the Strategic Road Network from Herringthorpe, East Herringthorpe and East Dene. Moorgate and Broom have an excellent bus service – part of the Maltby Quality Bus Corridor. The Sheffield - Rotherham - Doncaster (X78) high frequency bus service runs along the A630 in this area. The ASDA supermarket located at the Mushroom Roundabout serves the needs of the whole of east Rotherham. A small Aldi convenience store at St Anne's / Eastwood caters for some shopping needs in this locality. Varying levels of local shopping provision throughout the area. Herringthorpe, East Herringthorpe and East Dene are some of the most deprived in Rotherham. Potential for new development to be located on underused or previously developed land. Includes Herringthorpe Valley Park with its running track and playing pitch facilities attracting visitors from across the Borough. Clifton Park Museum and its surrounding open space and recreational play facilities provide a draw as do Rotherham Golf Club and Thrybergh Country Park which are also within this area.
1.6 Upper Don & Rother Valley
Area extends along the lower Rother valley adjacent to the communities of Brinsworth and Canklow and the predominantly industrial areas of Ickles and Templeborough. Brinsworth and Canklow have good access to the national motorway network via A630 and A631.
106 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Canklow is a one of the most deprived areas in the Borough. Existing employment opportunities in Brinsworth at its industrial estate and nearby Templeborough. Brinsworth has limited growth potential. Canklow is undergoing appropriate and targeted change and restructuring to improve the quality and image of the area. Significant regeneration within Templeborough including the recently completed office space. Includes Boston Castle & parkland as well as the open spaces of Canklow Woods and Moorgate Cemetery.
1.7 Rotherham Town Centre
Principal regeneration area : The Rotherham Heritage Initiative encompasses investment / funding from the public and private sectors. Re-development of the majority of the Guest & Chrimes site to provide a new civic centre and football stadium illustrate the type and scale of projects being undertaken. Despite decline / competition it remains the Borough’s primary centre with a variety of shops, leisure, recreation and community facilities. Incorporates a Customer Services Centre and library within the civic buildings - Riverside House. Limited population of approximately 1600 people. The area has an over-supply of social housing, concentrations of poor quality private sector housing, and substantial housing market gaps. Investment in the new railway station, civic offices and Rotherham College campus, is bringing substantial changes and releases a number of sites for re-development, offering an opportunity for the restructuring of the urban centre. Planning permission has recently been granted for the development of a Tesco Extra superstore on the site of former Council offices. Whilst the Conservation Areas may constrain some forms of development, retaining and improving the character of these areas (for example through the Townscape Heritage Initiative) also offer opportunities for enhancing the urban centre. Includes the Scheduled Ancient Monument of Rotherham Old Bridge as well as the Chapel of our Lady on Rotherham Bridge and Rotherham Minster. Moorgate Crofts business centre with its green roof provides exemplar sustainable design.
Development Constraints
1.8 Future development is constrained by:
1.9 North West Rotherham
Landscape constraints (Wentworth Parklands) to north/ west of Kimberworth Park/Greasbrough/Wingfield. Air Quality Management Area found along part of Wortley Road in Kimberworth and at Blackburn adjacent to Junction 34 of the M1.
1.10 Rawmarsh/Parkgate
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 107 1
Rosehill Victoria Park located in the northern part of the settlement is identified as a Local Nature Reserve and an Area of Ancient Woodland. However, this will only affect localised potential for growth. Land to the east and south of Rawmarsh/ Parkgate (although not immediately adjacent to the settlement) is identified as being within the indicative flood plain.
1.11 Aldwarke
Significant flood risk associated with River Don flood zones 2 and 3, limiting the ability to accommodate new development. Air Quality Management Zone situated to the south of the area in Eastwood. The Yorkshire Water Sewage Treatment Works at Aldwarke are a significant constraint to new residential development in this locality and within the wider Rotherham Urban Area. Some industrial activities in this area are bad neighbour activities including heavy industrial activity, glass production and oil recycling.
1.12 Thrybergh & East Rotherham
A wide area of open countryside extends beyond the built settlement north-eastwards towards the borough boundary with Conisbrough in Doncaster. Limited potential for expansion of Thrybergh, Dalton, Herringthorpe, East Herringthorpe and East Dene due to the high quality of the surrounding landscape and physical containment by existing built uses. Air Quality Management Area along the length of Fitzwilliam Road.
1.13 Upper Don & Rother Valley
Flood risk associated with the River Rother. Brinsworth is physically constrained by the M1 Motorway, railway line to the east and golf course to the north. An Air Quality Management Area is found in the locality of Junction 33 of the M1.
1.14 Rotherham Town Centre
Major transport infrastructure including the railway line running along the western edge of the settlement and the major road network. The river and canal result in a significant area of land predominantly to the west of the river falling within Flood Risk Zones 2 and 3. Rotherham town centre, Moorgate and Doncaster Road Conservation Areas. Air Quality Management Area found along Wellgate. 1.3 Bassingthorpe Farm (Core Strategy Broad Location for Growth)
1.15 The Bassingthorpe Farm Broad Location for Growth has been promoted in the Core Strategy as a sustainable urban extension for the wider Rotherham Urban Area. In total the development will provide around 2,400 new homes with 1,700 homes being delivered in this Plan period. The development will also provide around 11 hectares of land for employment purposes together with associated infrastructure requirements. The Council has been working in partnership with the two
108 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 principal landowners - the Fitzwilliam (Wentworth) Estates and Rotherham MBC as a joint venture. This partnership has been working collaboratively to prepare a shared vision, development objectives and a sound evidence base and this has been facilitated by the Homes and Communities Agency advisory team for large projects (ATLAS).
1.16 The joint team are currently preparing a clear overall vision statement that will guide all future masterplanning and design codes for this broad location for growth. The essential elements of this vision include the creation of a number of interlinked but distinct mixed use sustainable urban extensions with strong connections to and well integrated with, the existing communities and neighbourhoods of Greasbrough, Thorn Hill and Rotherham town centre. The development will be of a high quality design and will respond to the wider natural landscape. The approach to all future development on site will be through a Green Infrastructure led approach. A number of development objectives have been prepared to guide the development of future masterplans, design codes and planning applications for the site.
1.17 Delivery of residential development on site will be around 35 to 40 dwellings per hectare and is proposed on a mixed tenure basis. There are aspirations to build a new primary school within the site and to provide children's play facilities and further sports pitches and facilities. There will be space provided for allotments and some mixed commercial uses. To enable these supporting facilities to be provided the team are investigating joint approaches to ensuring their viable delivery on site.
1.18 The joint team has ensured the preparation of a number of evidence base studies to investigate the constraints and opportunities on site as well as to determine the overall scale and capacity of future development on site. In the latter stages of the collaborative working process the team has appointed consultants to investigate the viability and deliverability of the proposed scheme whilst fulfilling key sustainability objectives and to advise on potential funding sources and approaches to delivery to ensure the scheme can be delivered within the time frame.
1.19 The evidence base studies are available to download from the Local Plan web pages. The Bassingthorpe Farm Concept Plan is included as Map 3.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 109 1
Map 2 Bassingthorpe Farm (Core Strategy Broad Location for Growth)
110 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Map 3 Bassingthorpe Farm Concept Plan
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 111 1
1.4 Location Maps of Rotherham Urban Area
The following maps show all options for site allocations in the Rotherham Urban Area (split into 6 surveyed areas) plus Rotherham Town Centre
Map 4 Rotherham Urban Site Survey Areas
1.4.1 North West Rotherham
1.20 Map 5 'Proposed Development Sites in the North West of the Rotherham Urban Area' shows all the proposed development sites in the North West of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.21 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.22 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
112 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 1.23 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.24 Further detail is also given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 113 114 1 Map 5 Proposed Development Sites in the North West of the Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.2 Rawmarsh / Parkgate
1.25 Map 6 'Proposed Development Sites in Rawmarsh / Parkgate area of Rotherham Urban Area' shows all the proposed development sites in the Ramarsh / Parkgate area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.26 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.27 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.28 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.29 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 115 116 1 Map 6 Proposed Development Sites in Rawmarsh / Parkgate area of Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.3 Aldwarke
1.30 Map 7 'Proposed Development Sites in the Aldwarke area of Rotherham Urban Area' shows all the proposed development sites in the Aldwarke area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.31 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.32 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.33 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.34 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 117 118 1 Map 7 Proposed Development Sites in the Aldwarke area of Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.4 Thrybergh
1.35 Map 8 'Proposed Development Sites in the Thrybergh area of Rotherham Urban Area ' shows all the proposed development sites in the Thrybergh area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.36 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.37 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.38 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.39 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 119 120 1 Map 8 Proposed Development Sites in the Thrybergh area of Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.5 East Rotherham
1.40 Map 9 'Proposed Development Sites : East Rotherham area of the Rotherham Urban Area' shows all the proposed development sites in the East Rotherham area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.41 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.42 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.43 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.44 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 121 122 1 Map 9 Proposed Development Sites : East Rotherham area of the Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.6 Lower Don and Rother Valley
1.45 Map 10 'Proposed Development Sites in the Lower Don & Rother Valley area of Rotherham Urban Area' shows all the proposed development sites in the Lower Don & Rother Valley area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.46 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.47 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.48 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.49 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 123 124 1 Map 10 Proposed Development Sites in the Lower Don & Rother Valley area of Rotherham Urban Area Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 1.4.7 Rotherham Town Centre
1.50 Map 11 'Proposed Development Sites in Rotherham Town Centre' shows all the proposed development sites in the Rotherham Town Centre area of the Rotherham Urban Area.
1.51 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
1.52 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
1.53 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
1.54 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 125 126 1 Map 11 Proposed Development Sites in Rotherham Town Centre Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 1.5 Schedule of Sites and
Table 3 P ol icies Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
Dr Allocation Capacity Area (ha)
aft (estimated
total or 2013 balance remaining to be built)
LDF0014 OFF CENTENERY WAY / BAWTRY Industrial vacant Employment Development 0 6.65 ROAD Site
LDF0018 FIELD VIEW Business use vacant industrial Residential Development Site 129 0.00 premises
LDF0022 FORMER JOB LOT SITE Industrial and vacant industrial Residential Development Site 19 0.00 Business buildings
LDF0023 OFF GRANGE LANE Industry and vacant industrial Employment Development 0 9.72 \business buildings Site
LDF0027 FORMER THORN HILL PRIMARY Community Use Residential Development Site 13 0.00 SCHOOL
LDF0031 LAND OFF ROTHERHAM ROAD industry / business vacant land Employment Development 0 1.63 (HENRY BOOT SITE) Site
LDF0045 LAND OFF STUBBIN ROAD Green Belt Paddock / Grazing Residential Development Site 21 0.00 Area
LDF0046 LAND OFF SYMONDS AVENUE Part Green Belt / Part Grazing / Informal Residential Development Site 13 0.00 Residential Public Open Space
LDF0047 LAND OFF WENTWORTH ROAD Residential - H42 Agriculture Residential Development Site 217 0.00
LDF0060 LAND OFF HIGH STREET Community Facilities Informal public open Residential Development Site 16 0.00 space
LDF0064 SITES ON RYECROFT SPORTS Part Urban Sports ground Residential Development Site 37 0.00 GROUND Greenspace / Part Green Belt
LDF0065 LAND OFF YORK ROAD, Residential public car park Residential Development Site 30 0.00 127 128 1 Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0070 BELLOWS ROAD CENTRE Retail Various retail Residential Development Site 58 0.00 operations
LDF0074 LAND TO REAR OF PROPERTIES Residential Poultry Farm Residential Development Site 48 0.00 ON OCCUPATION ROAD
LDF0077 DALTON ALLOTMENT SITE Urban Greenspace vacant allotment land Residential Development Site 150 0.00 and residential
LDF0080 SITE OFF BARBERS AVENUE Part Residential / Part Social club Residential Development Site 24 0.00 Urban Greenspace
LDF0088 BOSWELL STREET AND ARUNDEL Community Facilities vacant land Residential Development Site 61 0.00 ROAD / Urban Greenspace
LDF0089 HERRINGTHORPE LEISURE Community Use vacant site - former Residential Development Site 97 0.00 CENTRE leisure building
LDF0097 ALDWARKE YORKSHIRE WATER Industry / Business Formerly used as part Employment Development 0 8.62 EAST AND WEST SITES (UDP of the sewage Site SITES E18 - WEST & E19 - EAST) treatment works adjacent to the settling lagoons.
LDF0098 UDP SITE ALLOCATIONS E17 AND Industry / Business General industry / Employment Development 0 8.75 E18 transport museum Site
LDF0099 UDP ALLOCATION MU15 / E16 Mixed use and General industry Employment Development 0 14.30 Si Site tes and LDF0102 PART OF MU14 UNDEVELOPED - Mixed Use Employment Development 0 1.58 PARKGATE BUSINESS PARK Site
P ol (SOUTH) icies LDF0103 LAND OFF WESTFIELD ROAD Residential Informal open space / Residential Development Site 14 0.00
Dr vacant allotment land aft
2013 LDF0104 ROUNDWOOD COLLIERY ACCESS General Industrial vacant land Employment Development 0 6.16 OFF ALDWARKE LANE Site Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
and Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated
P
ol total or icies balance remaining
Dr to be built) aft
2013 LDF0105 LAND WITHIN ALDWARKE STEEL General Industrial vacant / railway Employment Development 0 7.11 WORKS (CORUS) OFF DONCASTER sidings Site ROAD
LDF0110 EAST OF BRECKS LANE, R/O Green Belt agriculture Residential Development Site 95 0.00 BELCOURT ROAD
LDF0130 OFF FAR LANE Residential amenity open space Residential Development Site 13 0.00
LDF0134 LAND TO NORTH WEST OF Education Former Millside school Residential Development Site 38 0.00 DONCASTER ROAD DALTON
LDF0140 LAND EAST OF MEADOWHALL RD Green Belt Countryside / disused Residential Development Site 62 0.00 colliery
LDF0152 LAND ADJOINING FERHAM RD Community Facilities Vacant Land Residential Development Site 10 0.00 AND BELMONT ST
LDF0156 LAND BETWEEN FENTON RD AND Residential / Urban Countryside Residential Development Site 71 0.00 HENLEY LANE Greenspace
LDF0157 BASSINGTHORPE FARM LAND, Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 330 0.00 NORTH EAST OF HENLEY LANE
LDF0158 LAND NORTHWEST OF Residential H9 Countryside Residential Development Site 75 0.00 MUNSBROUGH LANE
LDF0159 LAND SOUTH OF MUNSBROUGH Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 300 0.00 LANE
LDF0160 LAND NORTH OF BARBOT HILL RD Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 80 0.00
LDF0161 LAND BETWEEN CARR HILL AND Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 200 0.00 SCROOBY LANE
LDF0162 LAND NORTH OF SCROOBY LANE Green Belt Agriculture Residential Development Site 80 0.00 GREASBROUGH 129 130 1 Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0170 LAND BETWEEN GRAYSON RD Urban Greenspace Urban Greenspace Residential Development Site 18 0.00 AND CHURCH ST
LDF0181 LAND BEHIND BRADGATE CLUB Urban Greenspace Urban Greenspace Residential Development Site 15 0.00
LDF0185 WHINNEY HILL SITE A Residential Allocation vacant land Residential Development Site 66 0.00
LDF0198 OLDGATE LANE SOUTH, B1 light industry / mix of residential and Residential Development Site 26 0.00 THRYBERGH residential industrial uses
LDF0199 CHESTERHILL AVENUE (EAST), B1 Light industry / industry and Residential Development Site 55 0.00 THRYBERGH Residential residential
LDF0200 GLEBE CRESCENT / CHESTERHILL Residential / Urban Residential / urban Residential Development Site 67 0.00 AVENUE Greenspace greenspace
LDF0233 OFF LATHE ROAD/ WORRY GOOSE Green Belt agriculture Residential Development Site 500 0.00 LANE
LDF0237 OFF SHROGSWOOD ROAD Green Belt & AHLV agriculture Residential Development Site 248 0.00
LDF0563 LAND OFF GODSTONE ROAD Mixed Use and Derelict Building Residential Development Site 26 0.00 Conservation Area
LDF0565 LAND AT THE JUNCTION OF Mixed Use - MU23 The site is derelict. Residential Development Site 128 0.00 WELLGATE AND HOLLOWGATE
LDF0602 PHOENIX BUSINESS PARK (UDP Industry / Business Employment Development 0 2.55 Si
tes E27 & E29 REMAINDER) Site and LDF0608 SWINDEN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE Light industry open space within the Employment Development 0 0.55
grounds of Swinden Site P ol House icies
LDF0691 LAND NORTH OF KILNHURST RD, Green belt Agricultural Residential Development Site 97 0.00 Dr RAWMARSH aft
2013 Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
and Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated
P
ol total or icies balance remaining
Dr to be built) aft
2013 LDF0747 LAND ADJACENT TO MAGNA Industry and Business vacant sites Employment Development 0 2.09 TEMPLEBOROUGH Site
LDF0755 FORMER DC COOK SITE Industrial and vacant [former car Employment Development 0 1.01 business sales] Site
LDF0756 RECREATION GROUND, SCHOOL Urban Greenspace informal recreation Employment Development 0 1.79 LANE Site
LDF0761 LAND TO EAST OF HARDING Green Belt Agriculture Residential Development Site 291 0.00 AVENUE (FORMERLY PART OF LDF0049)
LDF0764 LAND SOUTH OF BARBOT HILL Green Belt Countryside Employment Development 0 6.53 ROAD Site
LDF0765 BASSINGTHORPE FARM LAND, Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 500 0.00 SOUTH OF BASSINGTHORPE LANE
LDF0767 BASSINGTHORPE FARM LAND, Green Belt Countryside Residential Development Site 30 0.00 NORTH OF HENLEY RISE AND CLOUGH BANK
LDF0769 LAND SOUTH OF GREASBROUGH Green Belt Employment Development 0 4.51 ROAD AND WEST OF SCHOOL Site LANE
LDF0770 LAND SOUTH OF MEADOWHALL Green Belt Countryside / disused Residential Development Site 69 0.00 RD colliery
LDF0785 LAND AT MOORHOUSE LANE Green Belt Residential Development Site 62 0.00
LDF0793 LAND NORTH OF HARRY CROFT Green Belt Residential Development Site 180 0.00
Safeguarded Land
LDF0664 LAND TO NORTH OF GRANGE Green Belt Agricultural Safeguarded Land 345 0.00 ROAD 131 2
2 Proposed Development Sites in Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common
2.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
2.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common settlement grouping:
Table 4
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement for Growth Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy The Dinnington Settlement Grouping (Dinnington, Anston, (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Laughton Common) will be identified as a principal Table 1) settlement capable of accommodating significant growth at an appropriate level in the future. Dinnington has significant employment opportunities available locally, there is a college of further education and a modern transport interchange linking the wider rural hinterland to Rotherham-.Sheffield -Worksop. Current Size of settlement 7.8 % (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 1300 - 9% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 12 Hectares - 18% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Town Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
132 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Core Strategy Retail Maintain the range of retail and service provision, reduce Strategy for Settlement vacancies and improve townscape and landscaping (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
2.2 Settlement Profile
2.2 Settlement Characteristics:
2.3 Dinnington
Principal regeneration area. Pockets of very poor quality housing along Leicester Road and East Street which are some of the most deprived in the Borough. Strong local centre with a variety of shops and community facilities. Substantial regeneration investment has taken place to reclaim the colliery site and create industrial/ commercial development and greenspace. Some areas of land in the central area are derelict or underused, offering scope for substantial improvement. Recent infrastructure investment, e.g. new school, community resource centre, transport interchange, managed workspace.
2.4 North Anston
Number of attractive properties, particularly in and around the Conservation Area. Characteristics of a commuter village. Investments in Woodland Drive estate to improve housing and environmental quality. New health centre/ children’s play facilities at entrance to Greenlands Park. Potential in the short to medium term (i.e. within next 5 years) for the Sustrans Connect 2 project to invest in networks of walking and cycling routes running from Thurcroft via North Anston through to Woodsetts.
2.5 Laughton Common
Strategic location on the edge of the colliery site re-development at Dinnington. Opportunity to develop prominent ‘gateway’ sites into Laughton Common are well underway. Recent housing development and investment has increased the population, provided a wider range and type of housing and new neighbourhood centre.
2.6 South Anston
Desirable commuter village character with higher value residential profile. Limited range of services. Very little opportunity for additional development.
2.7 Development Constraints:
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 133 2
2.8 Future development is constrained by:
The Area of High Landscape Value to the north, south and east. The railway line running along the western edge of Dinnington and between North and South Anston. Anston Brook situated between North and South Anston is within Flood Risk Zones 2 and 3. A number of Local Wildlife Sites and Greenspace sites within the study area. Dinnington, North Anston and South Anston Conservation Areas. The high grade agricultural land quality to the east of Dinnington 2.3 Location Map of Sites
2.9 Map 12 'Proposed Development Sites in Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common' show all the proposed development sites in the Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common settlement group.
2.10 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
2.11 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
2.12 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
2.13 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
134 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Si tes Map 12 Proposed Development Sites in Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 135 136 2 2.4 Schedule of Sites
Table 5
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Residential Employment Area Allocation Allocation Capacity (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0207 ALLOTMENT LAND Urban Greenspace Currently used as Residential 15 0.00 OFF EAST STREET allotment land, Development Site however, the allotments are overgrown and appear unused.
LDF0209 LAND BETWEEN Business Use Depot site to west of Residential 30 0.00 SHEFFIELD ROAD Ryton Road Development Site AND MINERAL RAILWAY
LDF0219 LAND OFF Green Belt Vacant Field. Residential 243 0.00 WENTWORTH WAY However there are a Development Site number of desire lines running through part of the site suggesting an informal local use.
LDF0221 LAND OFF Green Belt The site is the CiSWO Residential 46 0.00 SILVERDALES recreation ground. Development Site
LDF0222 LAND OFF Residential Area - The site is currently Residential 51 0.00 LEICESTER ROAD H29 vacant scrub land Development Site Si
tes and minor
miscellaneous and activities including
P industry occur here. ol icies LDF0229 LAND OFF BOOKERS Industrial & Business, The southern half of Employment 0 5.50
WAY known interest, the site is currently Development Site Dr
aft greenspace used for industrial
and business 2013 purposes. The Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Residential Employment Area
and Allocation Allocation Capacity (ha) (estimated total or
P
ol balance remaining icies to be built)
Dr northern half of the aft site is undeveloped.
2013 Part of the undeveloped section is designated as business and industrial use and the other part is an area of known interest and urban greenspace. (to be retained)
LDF0232 LAND OFF OUTGANG Residential The site is currently Residential 83 0.00 LANE an undeveloped Development Site agricultural field. Planning permission granted and construction started.
LDF0235 LAND TO THE SOUTH Industrial and Undeveloped open Employment 0 17.08 OF MONKSBRIDGE Business Use grassland. Restored Development Site ROAD former colliery site. The site has been reclaimed for industrial and business purposes.
LDF0238 TIMBER YARD OFF Industrial and Timber Yard and Residential 274 0.00 OUTGANG LANE Business Use Works. Development Site Outline planning permission for 274 dwellings was granted 16/02/10 [RB2008/0220]
LDF0239 OLD SCHOOL SITE Community Facilities The site is currently Residential 75 0.00 OFF DOE QUARRY and Residential unused scrub land Development Site LANE which was formally 137 138 2 Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Residential Employment Area Allocation Allocation Capacity (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
part of an old school site/ playing field.
LDF0240 OLD KWIK SAVE SITE Retail Use / UGS Various uses Residential 22 0.00 OFF LORDENS HILL including derelict land Development Site and some car parking. Former allotments. Planning permission for residential.
LDF0498 LAND OFF Green Belt Agricultural Land Residential 311 0.00 OLDCOATES ROAD (formerly larger site Development Site (WEST) including new LDF0799)
LDF0598 DINNINGTON Mixed Use Part of the former Employment 0 4.18 COLLIERY SITE Dinnington Colliery Development Site PHASE 1 site has already been (REMAINDER) MU36, developed for E44, E45 employment activities and a family pub / restaurant. UDP allocations sites MU36, E44, E45
Safeguarded Land
Si LDF0208 LAND TO THE EAST Green Belt, The site is an Safeguarded Land 38 0.00 tes OF PENNY PIECE Conservation Area undeveloped field in
and LANE the Green Belt.
P LDF0211 LAND TO THE SOUTH Green Belt The site is currently Safeguarded Land 180 0.00 ol
icies OF WOODSETTS undeveloped. Arable ROAD field designated as
Dr Green Belt aft
2013 Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Residential Employment Area
and Allocation Allocation Capacity (ha) (estimated total or
P
ol balance remaining icies to be built)
Dr LDF0215 LAND TO THE Green Belt The site is currently Safeguarded Land 69 0.00 aft NORTH OF an undeveloped
2013 RACKFORD ROAD arable field in the Green Belt.
LDF0799 LAND OFF Green Belt Agricultural Land Safeguarded Land 759 0.00 OLDCOATES ROAD (formerly part of site (EAST) LDF0498) 139 3
3 Proposed Development Sites in Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield Common
3.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
3.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield Common settlement grouping:
Table 6
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement for Growth Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Bramley / Wickersley / Ravenfield Common provide a good (Core Strategy Policy CS1, range of service provision, are in close proximity to the Table 1) main urban area and considered able to accommodate new growth. Particular consideration will be given to addressing a shortfall in school places to ensure that educational needs in this community are met. Current Size of settlement 8.9% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 800 - 6% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 0 hectares - 0% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Wickersley - District Centre Retail Hierarchy Bramley - Local Centre (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
140 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Core Strategy Retail Wickersley - Maintain the range of retail and service Strategy for Settlement provision, improve convenience retail provision (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Bramley - Encourage developments which improve Table 1) comparison goods and service facilities provision and reduce vacancies.
3.2 Settlement Profile
3.2 Settlement Characteristics
Small area of deprivation in Sunnyside indicates the comparatively affluent nature of the remainder of the settlement. The majority of the housing stock is in good condition with many properties being larger than the Borough average. The main employment area is the Business Park and Morrisons superstore to the east of the settlement (MU26), adjacent to the M18 Motorway. A very limited number of general industrial type operations are located in the settlement. No employment land supply available to meet the future needs of the settlement. High quality shopping within the town centres. Conservation Area within Wickersley. Easy access to the M18 and wider motorway network making Bramley and Wickersley attractive to commuters. Silverwood former colliery tip has now been completely restored including the area most recently used for open cast mining. This has created new greenspace.
3.3 Development Constraints
3.4 Future development is constrained by:
The M18 Motorway to the east. Brecks Plantation to the west. Former disposal site for mineral waste to the north-west. Areas of High Landscape Value to the south and west. A number of Candidate Local Wildlife sites are dispersed around the settlement boundary. 3.3 Location Map of Sites
Map 13 'Proposed Development Sites in Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield' show all the proposed development sites in the Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield settlement group.
Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 141 3
The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
142 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Map 13 Proposed Development Sites in Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 143 144 3 3.4 Schedule of Sites
Table 7
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0359 LAND OFF MELCISS ROAD Residential Informal public open Residential Development 45 0.00 Development Site - space Site H47
LDF0360 PONY PADDOCK OFF SECOND Green Belt Pony Paddock Residential Development 56 0.00 LANE Site
LDF0366 COUNCIL DEPOT & YORKSHIRE Business Use Highways Depot / Residential Development 28 0.00 WATER SITE OFF BAWTRY Yorkshire Water Site ROAD reservoirs
LDF0368 LAND OFF GILL CLOSE Residential Maintained grassland Residential Development 21 0.00 Development Site - Site DVU0046
LDF0649 LAND OFF NETHERMOOR Green Belt agricultural Residential Development 128 0.00 DRIVE / SECOND LANE Site
LDF0737 LAND OFF FAIRWAYS Residential No formal use Residential Development 12 0.00 Site Si
tes LDF0774 LAND EAST OF MOOR LANE Green Belt Agriculture Residential Development 304 0.00 SOUTH Site and
Safeguarded Land P ol icies LDF0371 LAND OFF ST ALBAN'S WAY Green Belt, Area of Agricultural field Safeguarded Land 136 0.00
High Landscape Value Dr aft LDF0375 WREXHAM HOUSE Green Belt Cattery / Residential Safeguarded Land 23 0.00
2013 Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
and Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated
P
ol total or icies balance remaining to
Dr be built) aft
2013 LDF0458 LAND ADJACENT WREXHAM Green Belt Natural grassland Safeguarded Land 53 0.00 HOUSE
LDF0798 LAND EAST OF MOOR LANE Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 437 0.00 SOUTH (2) - FORMERLY PART OF LDF0452 145 4
4 Proposed Development Sites in Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton and West Melton
4.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
4.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton and West Melton settlement grouping:
Table 8
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement for Growth Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Wath / Brampton / West Melton lie at the heart of the (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Dearne Valley communities. Wath provides the range of Table 1) service provision which aligns with the role of Principal Town and which serves the neighbouring settlement of Brampton / West Melton, which are close to a major retail park on the site of the former Cortonwood Colliery site. Wath / Brampton / West Melton settlements are within a key public transport corridor, and there are significant employment opportunities available in the locality. A Further Education college is also located at Wath. Current Size of settlement 7.1% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 1,300 - 9% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 16 hectares - 9% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Town Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
146 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Core Strategy Retail Maintain the range of retail and service provision. Strategy for Settlement (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
4.2 Settlement Profile
4.2 Settlement Characteristics
4.3 Brampton
Formerly within a Housing Market Renewal Area. Pockets of poor quality former NCB housing situated between Wath Road, Pontefract Road and Knollbeck Lane The settlement lacks a focus – it does not have a distinct local centre. Substantial regeneration investment has taken place to reclaim the Cortonwood colliery site and create industrial/commercial development, but this development is difficult to access from Brampton without a car. Large area of open space off Pontefract Road that could be partly utilised to develop a local centre.
4.4 West Melton
Lies between Brampton and Wath, looking to Wath for its service provision. Developed from an agricultural village based around Melton High Street, spreading northwards to become a commuter settlement. New housing development to the north east, at Manvers, is offering a wider choice of housing in this locality but with poor links to Cortonwood Business Park. Development south of Melton High Street is limited by Flatts Valley which is drained by Brook Dike.
4.5 Wath upon Dearne
Main town in the north of Rotherham Borough. Town centre would benefit from more investment. There is pressure for new housing to the north and east of Wath. Significant industrial and commercial redevelopment has taken place to the north of the settlement to provide new employment opportunities following the colliery closures. Links to the new development at Manvers need improving. Road links to the M1 and the A1(M) have been greatly improved. In close proximity is found the Dearne Valley Country Park, the RSPB Old Moor Wetlands Centre and Manvers Lake & Nature Trail Projects being undertaken to regenerate the wider area following the decline of the mining industry include the Dearne Valley Eco-Vision, which sees a quality natural setting as key to economic and social progress, and the Dearne Valley Green Heart Project with its emphasis on environmental improvements.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 147 4
A Nature Improvement Area has been designated in the Dearne Valley. River Dearne itself provides a significant feature.
4.6 Development Constraints
4.7 Future development is constrained by:
Borough boundary to the west and north. Green Belt to the south including an Area of High Landscape Value based around Wentworth Park. Brook Dike in Flatts Valley between West Melton and Wath incorporates a Local Wildlife Site. Areas of industrial land to north east of Wath Town Centre susceptible to flooding. Conservation area in central Wath. Large electricity sub-station south of Brampton and west of West Melton. Flood zones 2 and 3 found predominantly on the northern edges of the study area 4.3 Location Map of Sites
4.8 Map 14 'Proposed Development Sites in Wath, Brampton and West Melton' show all the proposed development sites in the Brampton, Wath upon Dearne and West Melton settlement group.
4.9 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
4.10 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
4.11 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
4.12 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
148 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Si tes Map 14 Proposed Development Sites in Wath, Brampton and West Melton and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 149 150 4 4.4 Schedule of Sites
Table 9
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0258 LAND TO THE EAST OF Industrial and Business Disused hillside covered Residential Development 233 0.00 CORTON WOOD BUSINESS Use in trees shrubs and Site PARK grass.
LDF0267 LAND TO THE NORTH OF Residential Currently under Residential Development 97 0.00 WESTFIELD ROAD construction Site
LDF0268 OFF ORCHARD PLACE Residential / Urban grassed area and Residential Development 14 0.00 Greenspace off-street parking Site
LDF0279 EAST OF STATION ROAD Industry / Business vacant land Residential Development 120 0.00 Site
LDF0280 CADMAN STREET residential and urban cleared site, part Residential Development 29 0.00 greenspace naturally regenerated Site
LDF0292 HIGHFIELD FARM Residential Farm Residential Development 70 0.00 Site
LDF0308 MANVERS WAY/ STATION Mixed use vacant Employment Development 0 1.94 ROAD Site
LDF0324 BRAMPTON CENTRE Business Use and Medical centre Residential Development 66 0.00
Si Community Facilities Site tes
and LDF0344 MANVERS WAY/ BROOKFIELDS Industry and Business vacant Employment Development 0 1.75 WAY Site
P ol
icies LDF0345 BROOKFIELD WAY Industry and Business Vacant land / Employment Development 0 1.83 Distribution depot Site
Dr
aft LDF0347 MANVERS WAY (EXPRESS Industry and Business residential development Residential Development 209 0.00
PARKS) underway Site 2013 Si tes Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
and Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated
P
ol total or icies balance remaining
Dr to be built) aft
2013 LDF0348 MANVERS WAY/ DEARNE LANE Industrial and Business vacant industrial land Employment Development 0 3.74 Site
LDF0351 MANVERS WAY Industry and Business vacant industrial land Employment Development 0 3.51 Site
LDF0605 BOLTON ROAD MANVERS UDP Industry Business Employment Development 0 1.48 E11 (PART) Site
LDF0771 LAND NORTH OF STUMP Community Use Vacant land Residential Development 21 0.00 CROSS ROAD, WATH Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0261 OFF FLATTS LANE AND Green Belt Meadowland Safeguarded Land 60 0.00 BROOME DRIVE
LDF0263 LAND BETWEEN PONTEFRACT Urban Greenspace Farmers field Safeguarded Land 200 0.00 ROAD AND BARNSLEY ROAD
LDF0270 LAND TO EAST OF WESTFIELD Green Belt Grassed Field Safeguarded Land 260 0.00 ROAD
LDF0298 LAND OFF FARFIELD LANE Green Belt agricultural land and Safeguarded Land 696 0.00 allotments 151 5
5 Proposed Development Sites in Kiveton Park and Wales
5.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
5.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Kiveton Park and Wales settlement grouping:
Table 10
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Kiveton Park / Wales provide a reasonable level of service (Core Strategy Policy CS1, provision. Also there are two railway stations providing Table 1) links to Sheffield and the East Coast Main Line at Retford. Wales / Kiveton Park is considered able to accommodate some new growth in the Borough. Growth in the settlement may enhance its overall sustainability and give rise to opportunities for improving its current infrastructure and physical environment. Current Size of settlement 2.4% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 370 - 3% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 9 hectares - 5% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy District Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail Improve the quality and range of retail and service Strategy for Settlement provision, and environmental quality.
152 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
5.2 Settlement Profile
5.2 Settlement Characteristics
Opportunity to improve sustainability of schools and existing shops and services. Main employment sources at Wales Bar to the West and Kiveton Park Station to the East Former Colliery Site has been subject to substantial reclamation, and provides opportunities for leisure based around the long term aspirations to restore the Chesterfield Canaland the creation of an active marina. Development of this area may in turn facilitate re-use of the listed pit head baths building. Former Unsco Steel at Kiveton Park Station is a substantial site which is now home to a number of commercial uses. The future of this site is a major issue for the area. Reasonable access to M1 and two railway stations, although currently these have a limited service, there could be scope for improved services in the long term, to help link communities into job opportunities in the wider Sheffield City Region. In the long term potential exists for the Chesterfield Canal to be extended from Norwood Tunnel at Kiveton Park to Nethermoor Lake at Rother Valley Country Park. Potential in the short to medium term (i.e. within next 5 years) for the Sustrans Connect 2 project to invest in networks of walking and cycling routes. Wales Parish Playing Fields are a well used recreational facility in the heart of the settlement.
5.3 Development Constraints
5.4 Future development is constrained by:
The Integrated Impact Assessment (2011) identifies an area to north of Kiveton Park that is of significant importance to over-wintering birds Limited growth potential to the northeast due to the Local Wildlife Site Air quality management area in locality of School Road Wales where it crosses M1. Chesterfield Canal Area is designated as a Local Wildlife Site. 5.3 Location Map of Sites
5.5 Map 15 'Proposed Development Sites in Kiveton Park and Wales' show all the proposed development sites in the Kiveton Park and Wales settlement group.
5.6 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 153 5
5.7 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
5.8 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
5.9 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites
154 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Si tes Map 15 Proposed Development Sites in Kiveton Park and Wales and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 155 156 5 5.4 Schedule of Sites
Table 11
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0462 KIVETON PARK COUNCIL Green Belt, Known Depot Gypsy / Traveller Site 0 0.00 DEPOT Interest Outside Protected Site
LDF0475 CHAPEL WAY Residential Development Agriculture Residential Development Site 268 0.00 Site
LDF0483 NORTH OF SCHOOL RD Green Belt Agriculture Employment Development 0 5.99 Site
LDF0484 OFF WALESWOOD WAY Green Belt agriculture Employment Development 0 1.09 Site
LDF0547 HARD LANE Urban Greespace garages /wasteland Residential Development Site 14 0.00 / public amenity
LDF0599 E38 WALESWOOD (EAST) Industry business vacant employment Employment Development 0 2.85 land Site
LDF0600 E39 WALESWOOD (WEST) Inudstry business Vacant land Employment Development 0 8.85 / VECTOR 31 Site Si tes Safeguarded Land and
LDF0476 SOUTH OF LAMBRELL AVE Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 220 0.00 P ol icies LDF0480 STOCKWELL LANE Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 137 0.00
Dr aft
2013 6 Proposed Development Sites in Maltby and Hellaby
6.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
6.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Maltby and Hellaby settlement grouping:
Table 12
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Maltby performs the function of a principal settlement. (Core Strategy Policy CS1, However it may not be able to provide significant Table 1) opportunities for expansion in the future given the settlement's constraints. These include the Doncaster / Rotherham Borough boundary to the north, the topography of the land and the Sites of Special Scientific Interest to the south and the limits to development to the east imposed by the Maltby Colliery site). An alternative urban extension has been appraised as part of the Sustainability Appraisal to accompany the Core Strategy on sites to the south west of Maltby, close to the settlement of Hellaby. Current Size of settlement 7.2% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 700 - 5% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 4 hectares - 2% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Maltby - Town Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 157 6
Core Strategy Retail Improve pedestrian mobility / accessibility, the quality and Strategy for Settlement range of comparison shopping outlets, and environmental (Core Strategy Policy CS14, quality. Table 1)
6.2 Settlement Profile
6.2 Settlement Characteristics
6.3 Maltby
Opportunity to improve the quality and range of the housing stock especially in areas such as Braithwell Road which are currently subject to redevelopment. High levels of deprivation in the eastern half of Maltby, in particular the White City, Birk’s Holt, Model Village and Admirals Estate Main employment area is the Aven Industrial Estate . Newly opened customer service and leisure centres. Poor quality town centre shopping and public realm along High Street. Easy access to the M18 and wider motorway network making Maltby attractive to commuters. Coronation Park forms a focal point for the settlement. Significant recent redevelopment through the Building Schools for the Future scheme. Maltby Colliery - In recognition of the Colliery's recent mothballing, discussions with the operators are ongoing to establish its most appropriate policy context and potential to contribute to the Borough's growth requirements.
6.4 Hellaby
Main employment source is the Hellaby Industrial Estate. Small volume of housing in the Hellaby area. Grade II* Listed Building and Scheduled Ancient Monument at Hellaby Hall Hotel.
6.5 Development Constraints
6.6 Future development is constrained by:
The Doncaster / Rotherham Borough boundary to the north. The M18 motorway to the west. The minerals railway line to the south-east of Maltby Maltby Dyke to the south which results in adjacent land being within Flood Risk Zones 2 and 3. Maltby Wood and Low Common to the east. Area of High Landscape Value to the south. A number of Local Wildlife Sites within the area. Site of Special Scientific Interest in south-east Maltby at Wood Lee Common
158 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Permission for extraction of minerals at the Clay Pits site between Maltby and Hellaby runs until 2042. Stately home and Capability Brown designed landscapes of Sandbeck Park to the south-east of Maltby. 6.3 Location Map of Sites
6.7 Map 16 'Proposed Development Sites in Maltby and Hellaby' shows all the proposed development sites in the Maltby and Hellaby settlement group.
6.8 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
6.9 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
6.10 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
6.11 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 159 160 6 Map 16 Proposed Development Sites in Maltby and Hellaby Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 6.4 Schedule of Sites and
P ol icies Table 13
Dr aft Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
2013 Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0271 LAND TO THE SOUTH OF STAINTON Green Belt Agricultural Field Residential Development Site 400 0.00 LANE
LDF0289 SITE OF COUNCIL DEPOT AND Business Use council depot and Residential Development Site 55 0.00 LANTERN ENGINEERING LTD OFF lantern engineering HAMILTON ROAD
LDF0294 NEWLAND AVENUE, BRAITHWELL Residential Area Vacant Residential Development Site 74 0.00 ROAD AND CHADWICK DRIVE, MALTBY
LDF0305 LAND AT MALTBY COLLIERY Green Belt Maltby Colliery Employment Development 0 40.61 Site
LDF0327 LAND OFF CUMWELL LANE Green Belt Agriculture Employment Development 0 9.10 Site
LDF0328 LAND OFF ROTHERHAM ROAD Business Use Informal open space Employment Development 0 1.03 Site
LDF0409 TARMAC SITE OFF BLYTH ROAD Mixed Use - MU32 Tarmac depot Residential Development Site 23 0.00
LDF0699 LAND NORTH OF SANDY LANE, Green Belt Agriculture Employment Development 0 2.81 HELLABY Site
LDF0709 LAND NORTH OF HELLABY Green Belt No formal use Employment Development 0 1.72 INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, HELLABY Site
LDF0757 WINCATON SITE, ROTHERHAM Business Use warehouse / Residential Development Site 96 0.00 ROAD distribution centre 161 162 6 Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0779 LAND ADJACENT TO M18 JUNCTION Green Belt Agriculture Employment Development 0 3.98 1 AND A631 Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0723 LAND OFF OUTGANG LANE Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 50 0.00
LDF0800 LAND EAST OF CUMWELL LANE, Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 433 0.00 SOUTH OF BATEMAN ROAD Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 7 Proposed Development Sites in Aston, Aughton and Swallownest
7.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
7.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Aston, Aughton and Swallownest settlement grouping:
Table 14
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Aston / Aughton / Swallownest provide a reasonable level (Core Strategy Policy CS1, of service provision. They are considered able to Table 1) accommodate new growth in the borough. Growth may enhance the overall sustainability and give rise to opportunities for improving current infrastructure and the physical environment. Current Size of settlement 5.4% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 560 - 4% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 16 hectares - 9% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Swallownest - District Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail Maintain the quality and range of retail and service uses. Strategy for Settlement
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 163 7
(Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
7.2 Settlement Profile
7.2 Settlement Characteristics
7.3 Aston
Retains elements of historic character particularly in the Conservation Area. Historic Aston Hall Hotel and surrounds and Aston Church - both listed Good connections with the strategic road network and M1 junction 31. Situated on a medium bus frequency route. Limited range of services. Small local centre. Characteristics of a commuter village. A new swimming pool and sports facilities provided within the Aston Comprehensive School for wider community use. A Rotherham Borough Council Customer Service Centre is found on Worksop Road.
7.4 Aughton
Limited range of services. Good connections with the strategic road network and Ulley Country Park Situated on a medium bus frequency route. Strong historic core. Ulley Country Park is found close-by to the north.
7.5 Swallownest
Strong district centre with a variety of shops and community facilities. The provision of integrated community service facilities (health, police and RMBC customer services) provided at Mill Stone Hill in the one stop shop format. Situated on a medium bus frequency route. Good connections with the strategic road network (A57) and M1 junction 31. Situated on a medium bus frequency route. Leisure facility to be developed within the nearby Rother Valley Country Park, includes ancillary facilities. The Core Route of the Sustrans Connect2 project, extending from Rother Valley Country Park to Killamarsh provides a multi-user trail linking in with existing routes.
7.6 Development Constraints
7.7 Future development is constrained by:
The Area of High Landscape Value to the north and north east of the settlement.
164 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 The A57 and B6200 which runs along the southern edge of the settlement. A number of Greenspace sites within the study area. The Green Belt boundary. Woodhouse washlands (functional floodplain) to west of Swallownest. Ulley Country Park to the north of Aughton. 7.3 Location Map of Sites
7.8 Map 17 'Proposed Development Sites in Aston, Aughton and Swallownest' shows all the proposed development sites in the Aston, Aughton and Swallownest settlement group.
7.9 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
7.10 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
7.11 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
7.12 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 165 166 7 Map 17 Proposed Development Sites in Aston, Aughton and Swallownest Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 7.4 Schedule of Sites and
Table 15 P ol icies Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
Dr Allocation Capacity Area (ha)
aft (estimated
total or 2013 balance remaining to be built)
LDF0418 LAND TO NORTH OF ASTON Green Belt Agricultural land Residential Development 99 0.00 BYPASS A57, EAST OF MANSFIELD Site ROAD
LDF0419 LAND TO EAST OF LODGE LANE Urban Greenspace vacant land Residential Development 19 0.00 Site
LDF0429 LAND AT JUNCTION OF MAIN Community incidental greenspace / Residential Development 15 0.00 STREET AND ROTHERHAM ROAD landscaped area Site SWALLOWNEST
LDF0447 LAND TO EAST OF PARK HILL Green Belt / B1 light Agricultural land / Petrol Residential Development 96 0.00 FARM industry Filling station / car sales Site
LDF0448 ASTON COMMON EAST OF Green Belt Agricultural / pasture Residential Development 175 0.00 WETHERBY DRIVE Agricultural land land Site
LDF0449 ASTON COMMON - WEST OF Green Belt Agricultural land / Employment Development 0 2.36 MANSFIELD ROAD scrubland Site
LDF0451 LAND AT FORMER LAYCAST B1, B2, B8 general Coal extraction / Potential Employment Site 0 9.33 WORKS industry remediation
LDF0453 UDP SITE E36 REMAINDER Business Use agricultural land Potential Employment Site 0 2.64
LDF0601 FORMER BEIGHTON COLLIERY Mixed Use allocation Vacant land awaiting Potential Employment Site 0 1.94 SITE (MU29 PART) PARK VIEW development SWALLOWNEST
LDF0758 ASTON COMMON - EAST OF Green Belt Agricultural land Employment Development 0 2.43 MANSFIELD ROAD INDUSTRIAL Site ESTATE 167 168 7 Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0759 ASTON COMMON - SOUTH OF Green Belt Agricultural land Residential Development 150 0.00 MANSFIELD ROAD Site
LDF0792 LAND OF MANSFIELD ROAD Green Belt Agricultural land Residential Development 18 0.00 Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0413 THE WARREN Residential Informal Greenspace Safeguarded Land 54 0.00
LDF0454 DISUSED TIP ON ASTON BYPASS Urban Greenspace disused tip Safeguarded Land 50 0.00 (B6200) Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 8 Proposed Development Sites in Swinton and Kilnhurst
8.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
8.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Swinton and Kilnhurst settlement grouping:
Table 16
Position in Core Strategy Principal Settlement Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Swinton / Kilnhurst are also located in the Dearne but are (Core Strategy Policy CS1, close to the Rotherham Urban Area. The settlement Table 1) grouping has high levels of population and provides some higher order services. Although the communities do not serve a wider catchment area they provide a level of service provision which supports the local population. Swinton has a railway station linking to Sheffield / Leeds and Doncaster which may make it suitable for future growth opportunities. It is considered that Swinton / Kilnhurst fulfil a role as Principal Settlement although future opportunities for growth are limited. There is one highly contaminated site (the former Croda site) within the settlement that may be able to provide some development opportunities in the future. It is highly likely that significant public sector investment will be essential to satisfactorily "clean / decontaminate" the site to enable housing development to proceed on site. Current Size of settlement 5.8% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 560 - 4% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 0 hectares - 0% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 169 8
(Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Swinton - District Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail Improve environmental and physical quality of the shopping Strategy for Settlement precinct in particular. Improve retail provision and (Core Strategy Policy CS14, pedestrian movement. Table 1)
8.2 Settlement Profile
8.2 Settlement Characteristics
8.3 Swinton
Formerly within a Housing Market Renewal area. Town centre would benefit from more investment. Railway station provides direct train links to Rotherham, Sheffield, Doncaster and Leeds. Industrial area to north east, between the town and neighbouring Mexborough. Lack of employment land to meet future projected requirements. Swinton Pottery (The Rockingham Works) Scheduled Ancient Monument is found. A Rotherham Borough Council Customer Service Centre is found on Station Street.
8.4 Kilnhurst
Residential developments in the 1980’s effectively joined Kilnhurst and Swinton. Looks to Swinton for its services. Road access is relatively poor, particularly for goods vehicles. Has a good centrally located community building and sports ground that provides a community focus. New housing development underway on former industrial land to east of settlement, adjoining the canal. Lack of employment land to meet future projected requirements. Potential for further canal-side residential development.
8.5 Development Constraints
8.6 Future development is constrained by:
Green Belt to the north, east, south and west of the settlements. Conservation Area in central Swinton. Railway line, canal and river corridor to the east of settlements.
170 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Local wildlife sites to south and west of Swinton Flood zones 2 and 3 to the east of both Swinton and Kilnhurst 8.3 Location Map of Sites
8.7 Map 18 'Proposed Development Sites in Swinton and Kilnhurst' show all the proposed development sites in the Swinton and Kilnhurst settlement group.
8.8 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
8.9 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
8.10 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
8.11 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 171 172 8 Map 18 Proposed Development Sites in Swinton and Kilnhurst Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 8.4 Schedule of Sites and
P ol icies Table 17
Dr aft Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Allocation Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
2013 Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0376 CIVIC HALL SITE Retail, community, Various Town Centre Residential Development 50 0.00 (PART) greenspace and Uses. (Part to Site residential. residential)
LDF0392 LAND OFF TALBOT Industrial and Business Vacant Field Employment Development 0 1.54 ROAD Use Site
LDF0397 CRODA SITE Industrial and Urban Construction started Residential Development 381 0.00 Green Space Site
LDF0404 BRAMELD ROAD Residential cleared site Residential Development 32 0.00 Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0379 FIELDS OFF GOLDEN Green Belt Agricultural Field Safeguarded Land 131 0.00 SMITHIES LANE 173 9
9 Proposed Development Sites in Catcliffe, Orgreave, Treeton and Waverley
9.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
9.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy Final Draft proposes the following for the Catcliffe, Orgreave, Treeton and Waverley settlement grouping:
Table 18
Position in Core Strategy Catcliffe, Orgreave & Treeton - Local Service Centre Settlement Hierarchy Waverley - Local Service Centre with significant potential (Core Strategy Policy CS1) for growth Strategy With more limited social infrastructure the Catcliffe, (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Orgreave & Treeton grouping provides a local service centre Table 1) function. This does not necessarily preclude further development, particularly where they are well served by public transport. The grouping includes a retail park at Catcliffe. Waverley is defined as a Local Service Centre with significant potential for growth. Waverley new community will deliver 3,900 new homes in total (although only 2,500 are anticipated to be delivered in the Plan period) and supporting community services and facilities will create a new sustainable community in this locality. The adjacent Advanced Manufacturing Park provides a significant number of local job opportunities. Current Size of settlement Catclifee, Orgreave & Treeton: 2.6% (as % of Borough Total Waverley: 0% Number of Households) Target Number of New Catclifee, Orgreave & Treeton: 170 - 1% Homes (2013-2028) and Waverley: 2,500 - 17% Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New Catclifee, Orgreave & Treeton: 6 hectares - 3% Employment Land Waverley: 38 hectares - 23% (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1)
174 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Position in Core Strategy Local Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail Encourage developments which improve comparison goods Strategy for Settlement and service facilities provision and reduce vacancies. (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
9.2 Settlement Profile
9.2 Settlement Characteristics
9.3 Catcliffe
Small settlement divided into three by the railway and the A630. Southern part of village is low-lying and subject to flooding problems. Has a large supermarket and recently located Boundary Mills within the former Big W unit. Limited local services within the village. Good road links to Sheffield, Rotherham and the national motorway network. The Scheduled Ancient Monuments of the Glassworks Cone and Blue Mans Bower are found.
9.4 Treeton
Popular commuter village. New residential developments on site of former colliery. Good sporting facilities off Washfield lane. Historic village centre designated as Conservation Area. Strong Green Belt boundary. Limited local services
9.5 Orgreave
Small residential area to south of study area, with no local facilities other than a new children’s play area. Surrounded by Green Belt to north and East, railway to west and the B6200 to the south No scope for additional development. Immediately adjacent to Sheffield City Council administrative area and the settlement of Woodhouse Mill.
9.6 Waverley
Former open cast site reclaimed for development. Already partly developed for advanced manufacturing park. Planning permissions for a new mixed community at Waverley have been granted and new homes are for sale on site.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 175 9
New community will provide employment, housing, recreation, retail and leisure opportunities. Major greenspace opportunities within the Green Belt. This will include an enhanced potential for biodiversity interest as well as new recreational amenities and allotments. Possible creation of new link road.
9.7 Development Constraints
9.8 Future development is constrained by:
The railway line running along the western edge of Treeton and the eastern edge of Catcliffe. A number of Greenspace sites within the study area. Local Wildlife Sites to the south of Treeton. The land adjacent to the River Rother which is within Flood Risk Zones 2 and 3. Functional flood plains. The Green Belt boundary. The Sheffield Parkway A630 and the M1 motorway. The Brinsworth Air Quality Management Area which covers Brinsworth, the M1 junction 33 and part of the Sheffield Parkway. 9.3 Location Map of Sites
9.9 Map 19 'Proposed Development Sites in Catcliffe, Treeton, Orgreave and Waverley' shows all the proposed development sites in the Catcliffe, Orgreave, Treeton and Waverley settlement group.
9.10 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
9.11 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
9.12 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
9.13 Further Detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
176 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Si tes Map 19 Proposed Development Sites in Catcliffe, Treeton, Orgreave and Waverley and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 177 178 9 9.4 Schedule of Sites
Table 19
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0489 LAND TO THE SOUTH OF Green Belt Agricultural Land Residential Development 75 0.00 WOOD LANE Site
LDF0491 LAND OFF ROTHER Community Facilities Agricultural Field, planning Residential Development 51 0.00 CRESCENT and Residential permission granted. Site
LDF0501 LAND TO THE REAR OF Urban Greenspace informal greenspace Potential Employment Site 0 3.13 BLUEMANS WAY
LDF0502 LAND OFF EUROPA LINK Green Belt Open fields. Potential Employment Site 0 6.55
LDF0505 LAND WEST OF SHEFFIELD Retail vacant land Potential Employment Site 0 2.15 LANE
LDF0507 LAND TO THE NORTH OF Residential Vacant Land, planning Residential Development 13 0.00 FRONT STREET permission granted for Site residential
LDF0524 WAVERLEY AMP SITE Industry and Restored colliery site. Open Employment Development 0 21.00 Business cast site partly developed for Site Industry and Business
LDF0535 WAVERLEY MIXED USE Industry / Business / Former opencast site under Residential Development 2,500 0.00
Si COMMUNITY Minerals restoration. Planning Site tes permission granted for 3,890 and homes (2,500 in Plan Period)
P
ol LDF0754 EWS DISMANTLED RAILWAY Industry and business Disused railway line Employment Development 0 5.85 icies LINE, WOOD LANE Site
Dr LDF0760 HIGHFIELD COMMERCIAL Industry and business reclaimed opencast site Employment Development 0 13.36 aft Site
2013 10 Proposed Development Sites in Thurcroft
10.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
10.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Thurcroft settlement grouping:
Table 20
Position in Core Strategy Local Service Centre Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Thurcroft provides a Local Service Centre function although (Core Strategy Policy CS1, this does not necessarily preclude further development, Table 1) particularly where they are well served by public transport. Current Size of settlement 2.1% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Target Number of New 300 - 2% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New 6 hectares - 4% Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Position in Core Strategy Local Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail Encourage developments which improve comparison goods Strategy for Settlement and service facilities provision and reduce vacancies. (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1)
10.2 Settlement Profile
10.2 Settlement Characteristics
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 179 10
Reasonable access to the strategic road network. However, although immediately adjacent to the M1 Motorway, the nearest motorway junction is at Bramley/Hellaby to the north (Junction 1 M18). Majority of the housing stock is in good condition and it is evident that a proportion of the housing stock in the western part of Thurcroft is within local authority ownership. Incorporates a defined town centre with a good range of services but the centre is split into two separate areas (the northern Woodhouse Green and the southern Green Arbour Road). Possible need to support existing centres through consolidation or limited expansion. Limited range of employment opportunities provided by industrial estate and the local shops and services. Despite pockets of deprivation, overall the settlement does not form part of the most deprived areas in the Borough. To the north east of the settlement lies a fairly new housing estate (‘The Villas’) which is isolated from the remainder of the settlement. The intervening land and land between Steadfolds Lane and the disused railway has relatively poor visual quality. The restoration of Thurcroft colliery includes the maintenance of an area for biodiversity interest as Great Crested Newts are found. The recreation ground adjacent to the Gordon Bennett Memorial Hall forms a focal point of the settlement.
10.3 Development Constraints
10.4 Future development is constrained by:
The former railway line to the east, provide a pedestrian / cycle route to employment opportunities within Dinnington as part of the Sustrans project. M18 motorway to the west. A number of Local Wildlife sites are in close proximity to the settlement, particularly to the south and east. There is a need to fully consider the impact on coalescence with, and visual prominence from, Brampton en le Morthen. 10.3 Location Map of Sites
10.5 Map 20 'Proposed Development Sites in Thurcroft' shows all the proposed development sites in the Thurcroft settlement group.
10.6 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
10.7 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
180 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 10.8 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
10.9 Further Detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 181 182 10 Map 20 Proposed Development Sites in Thurcroft Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 10.4 Schedule of Sites and
Table 21 P ol icies Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
Dr Allocation Capacity Area (ha)
aft (estimated
total or balance 2013 remaining to be built)
LDF0432 NORTH OF THURCROFT Green Belt Agriculture Employment Development 0 6.17 INDUSTRIAL ESTATE Site
LDF0434 GREEN ARBOUR SCHOOL Residential overgrown grassland Residential Development 20 0.00 PLAYING FIELD (SOUTH) development site Site
LDF0435 GREEN ARBOUR SCHOOL Community Facilities Overgrown former Residential Development 20 0.00 PLAYING FIELD (NORTH) playing fields Site
LDF0436 SOUTH OF IVANHOE ROAD Urban Greenspace, Overgrown land Residential Development 39 0.00 Residential Site
LDF0437 OFF SAWN MOOR ROAD Development Site H23 Construction started Residential Development 369 0.00 Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0433 SOUTH OF BRAMPTON Urban Greenspace Agriculture Safeguarded Land 79 0.00 MEADOWS, WEST OF ST WITHOLD AVE.
LDF0773 EAST OF BRAMPTON ROAD Green Belt Agriculture Safeguarded Land 140 0.00 183 11
11 Proposed Development Sites in Non-Green Belt Villages : Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts and Laughton-en-le-Morthern
11.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy)
11.1 The Local Plan Core Strategy proposes the following for the Non-Green Belt Villages (Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts, Laughton en le Morthen):
11.2 Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts and Laughton en le Morthen
Table 22
Position in Core Strategy Local Service Centre Settlement Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS1) Strategy Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts and Laughton (Core Strategy Policy CS1, en le Morthen all perform functions as local service centres. Table 1) They provide a mainly local function, although this does not necessarily preclude further development, particularly where they are well served by public transport. The details of any potential growth opportunities within and on the edge of these communities will be decided within the emerging Sites and Policies Document. Current Size of settlements Thorpe Hesley - 2.1% (as % of Borough Total Number of Households) Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts, Laughton en le Morthen - Less than 1%
Target Number of New Thorpe Hesley: 170 - 1% Homes (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts, Laughton en le Morthen : 170 Total - 1% (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1) Target Amount of New Not specified Employment Land (2013-2028) and Percentage of Borough Total (Core Strategy Policy CS1, Table 1)
184 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Position in Core Strategy Possible Local Centre Retail Hierarchy (Core Strategy Policy CS14, Table 1) Core Strategy Retail If defined as Local Centre : Encourage developments which Strategy for Settlement improve comparison goods and service facilities provision (Core Strategy Policy CS14, and reduce vacancies. Table 1)
11.2 Settlement Profiles
11.3 Thorpe Hesley
11.4 Settlement Characteristics
Well preserved rural character. Contains a concentration of deprivation on the Hollywood estate of social housing to the south. Good connections with the strategic road network and the M1. Reasonable local services. Approximately one bus every hour to Sheffield and Rotherham. Capacity to accommodate some minor expansion.
11.5 Todwick
11.6 Settlement Characteristics
Small but desirable rural village with up-market residential profile. Good road links to Kiveton Park and Kiveton Bridge railway stations. Good road links to Worksop and the M1 motorway via A57 route. Strong Green Belt boundary protecting its rural setting. Limited local services. Approximately one bus every hour to Dinnington and Rotherham. Ongoing improvements to Todwick crossroads and A57 to improve safety and increase capacity.
11.7 Development Constraints
11.8 Future development is constrained by:
The Green Belt boundary in Todwick ensures the village retains its unique rural character and prevents the loss of open countryside The lack of local facilities and public transport links
11.9 Harthill
11.10 Settlement Characteristics
Small but desirable rural village with an increasingly upmarket residential profile.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 185 11
Good links to Kiveton Park and Kiveton Bridge railway stations. Proportion of social housing on the estate around Carver Close and Pryor Mede. Opportunity to regenerate residential development at North Farm Close. Strong Green Belt boundary protecting its rural setting. Limited local services. Approximately one bus every hour to Sheffield and Rotherham.
11.11 Development Constraints
11.12 Future development is constrained by:
The Green Belt boundary in Harthill ensures the village retains its unique rural character and prevents the loss of open countryside The lack of local facilities and public transport links
11.13 Woodsetts
11.14 Settlement Characteristics
Small but desirable rural village with an increasingly upmarket residential profile. Good road links to Dinnington, Worksop and the M1 motorway via A57 trunk route. Opportunity to provide infill off Gildingwells Road to bring an affordable housing offer to the village. Strong Green Belt boundary protecting its rural setting. Limited local services. Approximately one bus every hour to Worksop and Rotherham.
11.15 Development Constraints
11.16 Future development is constrained by:
The Green Belt boundary in Woodsetts ensures the village retains its unique rural character and prevents the loss of open countryside The lack of local facilities and public transport links
11.17 Laughton-en-le-Morthern
11.18 Settlement Characteristics
Attractive historic settlement. Numerous listed buildings in historic core. Lack of convenience facilities. Unsympathetic village expansion in the 1960s and 70s. Strong Green Belt boundary protecting its rural setting. No local facilities. Approximately one bus every hour to Dinnington and Rotherham
11.19 Development Constraints
186 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 11.20 Future development is constrained by:
The Green Belt boundary in Laughton en le Morthen ensures the village retains its unique rural character and prevents the loss of open countryside The lack of local facilities and public transport links 11.3 Location Map of Sites
11.21 Map 21 'Proposed Development Sites in Thorpe Hesley' shows all the proposed development sites in the Non Green Belt village of Thorpe Hesley.
11.22 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
11.23 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
11.24 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
11.25 Further Detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 187 188 11 Map 21 Proposed Development Sites in Thorpe Hesley Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 11.26 Map 22 'Proposed Development Sites in Todwick' shows all the proposed development sites in the Non Green Belt village of Todwick.
11.27 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
11.28 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
11.29 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
11.30 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 189 190 11 Map 22 Proposed Development Sites in Todwick Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 11.31 Map 23 'Proposed Development Sites in Harthill' shows all the proposed development sites in the Non Green Belt village of Harthill.
11.32 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
11.33 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
11.34 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
11.35 Further detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 191 192 11 Map 23 Proposed Development Sites in Harthill Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 11.36 Map 24 'Proposed Development Sites in Woodsetts' shows all the proposed development sites in the Non Green Belt village of Woodsetts.
11.37 Sites proposed to be allocated for residential and employment development uses are shown separately along with an estimate of the potential number of homes that could be built or the area in hectares respectively. Land that could potentially be allocated for employment use is shown (this is subject to the final route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link) plus Safeguarded Land for residential - i.e. land that is proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt but would be protected and not considered for development until after the Plan Period (after 2028).
11.38 The existing extent of Green Belt is also shown; in the future the Green Belt boundary will be subject to change when the development sites and additional safeguarded land sites are finalised.
11.39 These sites can all be viewed through our Local Plan pages.
11.40 Further Detail is given in the following schedule of sites.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 193 194 11 Map 24 Proposed Development Sites in Woodsetts Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 Si tes 11.4 Schedule of Sites and
Thorpe Hesley P ol icies Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment
Dr Allocation Capacity Area (ha)
aft (estimated total or
balance remaining 2013 to be built)
LDF0513 LAND AT ELDERTREE LODGE Green Belt Farm Residential Development 21 0.00 Site
LDF0515 LAND TO THE NORTH OF Green Belt Maintained grassland Residential Development 137 0.00 UPPER WORTLEY ROAD Site
Safeguarded Land
LDF0512 LAND AT THORPE COMMON Green Belt Overgrown vegetation Safeguarded Land 52 0.00 and car showroom
LDF0514 LAND TO THE SOUTH OF Green Belt Agricultural field Safeguarded Land 46 0.00 UPPER WORTLEY ROAD 195 196 11
Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts
Site LDF No Site Name Current UDP Existing Use Proposed Allocation Residential Employment Allocation Capacity Area (ha) (estimated total or balance remaining to be built)
LDF0544 LAND TO NORTH EAST OF Green Belt Fallow Agricultural Residential Development 54 0.00 GOOSE CARR LANE, TODWICK Land Site
LDF0533 LAND OFF WINNEY HILL, Green Belt Grassed Field Residential Development 39 0.00 HARTHILL Site
LDF0551 NORTH FARM CLOSE, HARTHILL Residential, Dilapidated Residential Development 40 0.00 Conservation Area and Residential Site Known Interest dwellings.
LDF0523 LAND AT THE JUNCTION OF Community Facilities Vacant Land Residential Development 10 0.00 GILDINGWELLS ROAD AND Site WORKSOP ROAD, WOODSETTS
Si tes and
P ol icies
Dr aft
2013 12 Methodology: Identification of Site Allocations
Developing the Site Selection Methodology
12.1 The process of identifying or “allocating” sites for new development requires a significant number of factors to be taken into account. There is numerous planning, heritage and nature conservation legislation, Central Government's National Planning Policy Framework and other best practice which requires potential impacts from development to be considered. This appendix provides details regarding the evidence base studies completed since work commenced to prepare an up to date development plan to guide future decision-making on planning applications; the identification of sites for consideration as potential development sites, and the methodology developed to assess the sustainability of a site and subsequently the selection of sites for future development - the allocations.
12.2 Around 650 individual sites have been considered as potential site allocations in Rotherham. It is essential that an objective and transparent method for choosing sites for future development and allocation is used. The following sections describe the methodology and evidence base studies that have been prepared over previous years prior to the preparation of this latest draft Sites and Policies document.
Evidence Base
12.3 Whilst the Council must plan for future growth, it also needs to protect sensitive areas from development and ensure that the pattern of development does not have a negative impact on the long term sustainability of the environment. Planning for the identification of potential development sites is supported by an extensive evidence base. This is discussed below.
Sources of Sites
12.4 Representations received as part of the preparation of the Unitary Development Plan during the 1990s, and commencement of its subsequent review in the early 2000s, yielded a long standing source of sites for consideration. Following the introduction of Local Development Frameworks by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004), the Council invited the submission of potential development sites from landowners.
12.5 This “call for sites” took place between January 2007 to November 2008 via the Council’s website and as part of the then consultation on the LDF’s Core Strategy (Core Strategy Preferred Options, 2007). Sites continued to be accepted after this date. The Council’s own Asset Management Team was also consulted for details of land in the Council’s ownership which should be considered.
12.6 Further sources of sites came from technical studies undertaken within the Planning Policy Team including the Urban Potential Study (2004), Employment Land Review (2007, updated 2010) and from Masterplans prepared to support the Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder initiatives.
Green Belt Review
12.7 A key task in deciding where and when new development should take place is to consider the potential impact of site allocations on the Green Belt (as defined in National Planning Policy
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 197 12
Framework (NPPF)). It is important to take into account the Green Belt’s historic and current context, its changing role over time and its geographical extent. Consideration is given to how the Green Belt performs in respect of the role and purposes defined by the NPPF.
12.8 A Strategic Green Belt Review, available to download from the Local Plan web pages, has been prepared which sets out the need, rationale and broad methodology for undertaking a Green Belt Review. The Green Belt Review provides an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of existing Green Belt boundaries, plus a consideration of wider sustainability issues. The Sites and Policies Document reviews the Green Belt and proposes appropriate changes to accommodate development proposals in the future. This Review provides certainty throughout the Local Plan period that no further changes to the Green Belt will be necessary.
12.9 The Council recognises the important role of the Green Belt in the Borough, particularly in preserving its towns and settlements from merging into one another, safeguarding the countryside and concentrating development into its urban areas, it is a key element to achieving sustainable development. The main objectives of the Local Plan in respect of the Borough’s Green Belt and settlement pattern are:
To maintain the Green Belt as the principal means of protecting the openness of the countryside and prevent the coalescence of Rotherham, Sheffield, Barnsley and Doncaster.
To maintain the existing settlement pattern of the Borough.
To concentrate development into, and on the edge of, the Borough’s main towns and settlements.
South Yorkshire Settlement Assessment (2005)
12.10 This study provided a consistent basis for assessing the role and function of settlements across South Yorkshire and to inform strategic regeneration and growth decisions at the local and regional level. This was undertaken through:
An assessment of the current role of settlements taking into account how the settlement functions in terms of provision of schools, health care, employment, retail and leisure opportunities. This assessment included a profile of each settlement based on its social and economic characteristics, service provision, accessibility, housing infrastructure and capacity considerations.
A comparison, based on this profile, of each settlement in terms of its current role and how regeneration, investment and decisions on growth may change its future.
Identification of the potential for each settlement to accommodate future growth in terms of how this would contribute to achieving long term change and overall sustainability - based on information available at the time.
12.11 The South Yorkshire Settlement Assessment 2005 is available to download from the Local Plan web pages.
Settlement Capacity Survey Methodology
198 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 12.12 The Core Strategy identifies broad targets for how much, and broadly where, new development should take place over the Plan period. However, this Document determines the Borough’s capacity to accommodate the level of growth envisaged and identifies specific sites for housing and employment uses. In the next consultation on this document town centre retail and leisure, waste and transportation related uses will also be identified.
12.13 In 2007 work began to identify the growth opportunities and capacity in the Borough for new development to inform the Core Strategy Revised Options which were published in 2009. An assessment of potential development sites was undertaken for each settlement and any potential expansion of them. The established methodology took account of factors such as:
The settlements' position in the South Yorkshire Settlement Assessment (2005) hierarchy.
Settlement form, e.g. edge of settlement or open countryside.
Physical constraints, e.g. topography, agricultural land, flood risk.
Healthy environment e.g. contamination, impact on greenspace.
Landscape and townscape impact .
Biodiversity and geodiversity - including Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Local Nature Reserves (LNRs), Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) & Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS).
Availability of and accessibility to services and facilities.
Transport access – comments received from the South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive based on modelling to measure the relative public transport accessibility.
Infrastructure capacity – a separate Infrastructure Delivery Plan has been prepared to inform Local Plan preparation.
12.14 Survey criteria were prepared based upon an analysis of the Sustainability Objectives detailed in the Rotherham’s LDF Sustainability Appraisal General Scoping Report (2006). This aimed to ensure the balanced consideration of all three aspects of sustainability (social, environmental and economic).
12.15 In November 2007 a workshop took place to discuss and agree the breadth and detail of the methodology which was subsequently used to undertake site assessments. This was attended by more than 60 people from a range of Council service areas and external interests.
12.16 Site surveys undertaken across the Borough in 2007-08 applied this methodology to assess each identified site.
12.17 The methodical evaluation of sites meant a collective professional judgement could be formed with regard to each site and was assessed in terms of whether future development would be constrained or whether there are minor or major reservations in terms of its potential for future allocation. Consultation was undertaken on the Sites and Policies Issues and Options Document in June 2011.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 199 12
12.18 Settlement Capacity Reports for each Settlement Grouping were prepared and the information presented in the following way:
Settlement role;
Settlement characteristics and key development constraints;
Schedule of sites surveyed (categorised according to survey source);
Options showing development potential for a range of potential uses. Options include (a) Containment; (b) Containment and Minor Expansion; and (c) Major Expansion;
Discussion of the achievability of Options;
Summary of survey findings illustrated on the accompanying Map; and
Conclusion on the ability of a settlement to achieve its Settlement Role
12.19 The settlement capacity reports prepared in 2008/09 are available from the Local Plan web pages. This survey work was used to re-evaluate the conclusions drawn within the 2005 South Yorkshire Settlement Study, comparing likely development opportunities and re-assessing the settlement classification.
Spatial Options Report (March 2009)
12.20 Further information on this progression is provided in the Spatial Options Report which itself has been subject to its own Sustainability Appraisal and formed the basis for the Core Strategy Revised Options.
12.21 It sought to reflect Planning Advisory Service guidance on producing an evidence base by focusing on:
Identifying the patterns and levels of growth in the Borough from Regional Spatial Strategy requirements and Growth Point status (1).
Setting out the additional evidence which had been produced since the 2007 Core Strategy Preferred Options document.
Reviewing and updating the Preferred Option on the basis of this new evidence.
How earlier consultation helped to refine the Preferred Options.
Setting out the revised spatial options in the context of other distinctive alternatives and what the implications of these different options might be.
1 In July 2008 South Yorkshire was granted new Growth Point Status by the Government, which increased Rotherham’s housing target 20% above the Regional Spatial Strategy.
200 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Urban Potential Study
12.22 This Study established the anticipated extent to which urban areas can accommodate additional housing development. It provides a basis to consider future land allocations and in the development plan.
12.23 The hybrid methodology used site survey and estimation techniques and was carried out in accordance with the Government’s guide to best practice, “Tapping the Potential” and the Yorkshire and Humber Assembly guidance "‘Regional Framework for Urban Potential Studies”. It involved the following stages:
Stage 1 Defining the study area
Stage 2 Identifying the potential sources of capacity
Stage 3 Surveying to identify opportunities
Stage 4 Assessing the potential housing yield
Stage 5 Discounting the potential to provide a realistic assessment of how much can be realised
12.24 Given the importance of the findings of the Urban Potential Study, the Borough Council commissioned Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners to maintain a watching brief over the Council’s urban potential work. This involved the verification of the methodology and the survey process, technical auditing of the study components and advising on a realistic discounting procedure.
12.25 The Urban Potential Study is available to download from the Local Plan web pages.
Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder
12.26 The overall strategic aim of the Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder in South Yorkshire was: “To build and support sustainable communities and successful neighbourhoods where the quality and choice of housing underpins a buoyant economy and an improved quality of life”
12.27 The strategic objectives were to:
Achieve a radical improvement in the character and diversity of neighbourhoods, helping to secure a more sustainable pattern in the sub-region.
Grow the area’s housing range, increasing housing choice in order to meet the aspirations of existing, emerging and incoming households.
Improve housing quality, ensuring that all tenures capitalise on the opportunities created through innovations in design, standards and efficiency.
12.28 Strategies to guide future development and implement practical solutions to restructure and renew housing markets were prepared. These formed the basis for the consideration of future
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 201 12
development opportunities and accompanying re-allocation requirements that may exist. The five target areas for the programme in Rotherham were:
The Town Centre
Rotherham West – Kimberworth, Kimberworth Park, Masbrough, Thorn Hill, Meadowbank
Rotherham East – Dalton, Thrybergh, East Herringthorpe, Herringthorpe
Rawmarsh and Parkgate
Wath and Swinton
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
12.29 The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) identifies how much land is potentially available to meet the housing land requirements for the Local Plan allocations. The SHLAA provides the evidence base to demonstrate that there is enough land to support the housing growth strategy set out in the Core Strategy. Within Rotherham, a joint Sheffield and Rotherham assessment has been undertaken to assess the potential future housing land supply within the Sheffield and Rotherham Strategic ‘Housing Market Area’. An Area of Search for the most sustainable locations for new housing outside existing built-up areas was determined and further details of this task are given below. The SHLAA has been overseen by a Working Group consisting of Council officers and other key stakeholders including adjoining local authorities, CPRE and representatives of the Home Builders Federation.
12.30 An important role of the SHLAA is to enable the assessment of a 5-year supply of deliverable sites. To be considered deliverable, sites should, at the point of adoption be:
Available – the site is available now and free of ownership constraints;
Suitable – the site offers a suitable location for development now and would contribute to the creation of sustainable, mixed communities;
Achievable – there is a reasonable prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within the time-frames identified.
12.31 Government Practice Guidance suggests that it may be helpful to identify particular types of land or areas within the areas of search that should be excluded from the assessment. On approval of the Working Group, the following categories of land were excluded, not all are applicable to Rotherham:
Internationally important nature conservation sites (RAMSAR sites, Special Areas for Conservation, Special Protection Areas)
Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs and National Nature Reserves (NNRs)
202 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Local Nature Reserves (LNRs)
Cemeteries, graveyards and crematoria
Active flood plains (Flood Risk Zone 3b)
Land associated with a Scheduled Ancient Monument
Waterways, reservoirs, lakes, ponds and dams (though waterways were not used to constrain the consideration of adjoining land if the waterway could reasonably be bridged)
12.32 As a general rule, it was considered undesirable to build housing on sites that are environmentally sensitive, are important for outdoor recreation or are in areas where the living environment may not be satisfactory. The following areas fall in this category:
Locally important nature conservation sites, as identified in the adopted UDP or emerging Local Plan.
Mature woodland not covered by nature conservation designations
Areas in active recreational use – parks, playing fields, sports grounds, golf courses, allotments and public open space identified by the Open Space Audit. Excludes vacant or derelict recreational land
Sites within 200m metres of the M1 & M18 motorways
Greenfield sites on the edge of smaller villages
Greenfield sites in Flood Risk Zone 3a
12.33 However potentially sensitive landscape areas were not excluded from consideration, but sensitive landscape areas do provide a useful indicator of those locations where development could have an unacceptable landscape impact. Areas where overhead power lines would be a potential constraint to development were also identified.
12.34 In identifying potential sites for development, the Council considered a transport-orientated approach to ensure that development:
Makes the best use of existing transport infrastructure and capacity;
Takes into account capacity constraints and deliverable improvements, particularly in relation to junctions on the Strategic Road Network; and
Considers public transport accessibility and maximises accessibility by walking and cycling.
Employment Land Review (2007, 2010)
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 203 12
12.35 In order to help provide a robust evidence base for preparation of the Local Plan and assist when determining planning applications, the Council produced an Employment Land Review in 2007. The preliminary report is divided into three parts:
Part 1 - Taking stock of the existing situation; sets out a review of Rotherham’s local economy at present. Part 2 - Identifying future requirements; utilises a range of methodologies to determine the amount of land that will be required to meet future employment needs. It shows how the likely portfolio of new sites provide for a range of requirements such as office floorspace, high quality business parks and supporting small businesses, as well as how these sites meet sector requirements. Part 3 - Identifying a new portfolio of employment sites; presents the outcomes of a qualitative review of employment land to help move towards establishing a portfolio of employment land suitable to meet Rotherham’s future requirements and market needs.
12.36 The report is accompanied by three background papers to further explain these issues.
12.37 A subsequent update took place in 2010 which takes stock of Rotherham’s current economy, looks at likely future economic changes and requirements, and considers the amount of land likely to be required for development to help meet these needs.
12.38 The Employment Land Review has assessed the suitability for continued, or potential use for economic purposes, of a range of sites across Rotherham, focusing primarily on land allocated for employment development in the Unitary Development Plan which remains undeveloped, a number of other sites currently or formerly used for employment purposes, and sites identified as potential allocations as part of our early Site Allocations work.
Accessibility to Public Transport
12.39 The South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive developed a methodology, in conjunction with the South Yorkshire local authorities, to assess the sustainability of proposals in terms of access to public transport and accessibility. The model, known as 'Land Use Transport Interaction Models (LUTI)' was used to test the potential site allocations at 2009, against the 'Core Public Transport Network' as defined in the Second South Yorkshire Local Transport Plan (LTP2). This includes the medium and high frequency bus corridors (6+ buses per hours), the Supertram Network and the Railway Network. The Core Network has been used as this provides an attractive public transport service and therefore focuses development in the areas where we can best utilise existing resources.
12.40 Once the Core Network was mapped, a walking distances buffer was applied to the access points (railway station, tram stops, medium and high frequency bus corridors) to create a catchment area buffer. Institute of Highways and Transport (IHT) guidance on walking distances to access public transport from new developments states that an individual is likely to walk 400m to access a bus service, 600m to access light rail (Supertram) and 800m to access a railway station.
12.41 The site classification process uses an allocation's proximity to the Core Network as a scoring mechanism. The scores are ranged on a red, amber, green assessment:
204 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Red : The characteristics of a red site are that the site does not fall within the buffer of the Core Network. Development on this site is not desirable as the site has limited access to public transport and is outside of the specified walking catchment area.
Amber : sites that require transport interventions to be considered as there are restriction to using public transport.
Green : Green sites fall completely within the Core Network buffer. In general, these allocations require minimal (if any) public transport intervention. However, if there are capacity restrictions, an intervention will need to be considered.
12.42 Consideration of the outcomes of the LUTI assessment was provided by representatives of the Council’s Transportation Section. Professional judgement was provided on the merits of the outcomes of the computerised modelling together with opinion on whether a site should be classified as Red, Amber or Green. This included deliberations on whether additional land/demolition would be required to enable the provision of appropriate access, identifying land which is remote from other residential areas, facilities and bus links, and establishing where there could be capacity issues, notably near the Motorway Network.
Infrastructure Delivery Study and Transport Modelling
12.43 The Council has also undertaken an Infrastructure Delivery Study (Roger Tym and Partners 2012) to investigate likely supporting infrastructure required to enable the delivery of sustainable development, by meeting the social and infrastructure needs of new residents within an area, and to mitigate any potential problems arising from significant new employment, residential and other development in a specific locality, where, this is viable to do so. Additionally Transport Modelling work (by MVA Consultants 2013) undertaken over the last year has specifically considered the impact the growth in housing and employment opportunities could potentially have on the local highway network. Ongoing consideration is being given to the likely mitigation required.
Integrated Impact Assessment
12.44 The Integrated Impact Assessment incorporates the Sustainability Appraisal, Health Impact Assessment and Equalities Impact Assessment. It incorporates the requirements of the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment Regulations. The purpose of the sustainability appraisal process is to appraise the social, environmental and economic effects of a plan from the outset. In doing so it will help ensure that decisions are made that contribute to achieving sustainable development. Jacobs UK Ltd have been appointed to undertake the Council's Integrated Impact Assessments.
Concluding Remarks
12.45 The above initial site assessment methodology and evidence base documents, enabled the identification of sustainable development survey criteria that has subsequently been used to guide the preparation of the Site Selection Methodology 2013 applied to all the sites surveyed for the consultation in 2013.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 205 12
Current Site Selection Methodology
12.46 Stage 1 represents an initial sieving exercise. The objective is to filter out at an early stage all those sites that have a significant overriding constraint(s) to development or are already developed. It also enables the defining of the “reasonable alternatives” in order to meet a requirement of the SEA Regulations. Any constraints are so significant that development is highly unlikely to be appropriate. The constraints relate to whether or not the site broadly conforms to the Rotherham Local Plan Core Strategy settlement hierarchy and a number of key environmental and heritage considerations.
12.47 Stage 2 considers the remaining sites and looks at more detailed site specific considerations and constraints. The aim of Stage 2 is to assess all sites that are deemed suitable under Stage 1 against a number of detailed site-specific sustainability factors and potential constraints to development, and by doing this, to comply with SA / SEA requirements. These relate to a variety of social, economic and environmental issues which conform to the statutorily agreed SA Framework. A simple Red / Amber / Green assessment for each of the criteria is used.
12.48 It should be noted that SA is not a decision-making tool, but rather SA informs decision-making. While the SA Objectives must be taken into account, planning considerations will influence decisions. Red / Amber / Green SA overall ‘scores’, one covering socio-economic considerations and one covering environmental considerations, will be given to each site and considered as part of the Stage 3 site prioritisation.
12.49 Stage 3 aims to prioritise all the sites that have progressed through from stage 1 and gone through the SA process. This will enable sites to be compared against each other and will prioritise those sites that are the most sustainable for development and best meet the priorities as per the Core Strategy. This stage will look at Green Belt / non Green Belt, type of urban extension to settlements, deliverability and other known physical constraints, including the proposed HS2 route. The SA cumulative effects of development will also be considered / scored here.
12.50 It should be noted that even some poorly performing sites may still need to be chosen to be allocated at the Stage 3 site prioritisation assessment if there are insufficient alternative sites available to meet the development needs for each settlement grouping identified within the Core Strategy. This process must be clearly and carefully recorded and an explanation given for the reason for allocation / non-allocation of each site.
Process:
Stage 1 - Automatic Site Exclusions:
12.51 A. Site developed or unavailable
Site is already fully developed – some sites that were put forward at the beginning of the process have now been fully developed Any site proposed for development must be likely to be developed (or at least started) during the plan period. Sites that are to be retained as Urban Greenspace will therefore be discounted as being unavailable. Constraints may also occur relating to ownership, or where the site is unlikely to receive any interest from a developer. The latest Strategic Housing Land Availability
206 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 Assessment (SHLAA) will be used to determine that there is a reasonable prospect that a site will come forward.
12.52 B. Conformity with the Local Plan Core Strategy settlement hierarchy:
The Core Strategy identifies urban settlement groupings that should be the focus for most of the new development (Policy CS1). Larger existing Local Service Centres are suitable for limited growth with other villages suitable for only limited housing growth to meet local needs. The strategy for Green Belt villages is not to provide for any further development other than some very limited small in-fill. Sites will therefore be discounted if they do not fall within or close to the identified settlement groupings unless they are of a proportionate size.
12.53 C. Key environmental and heritage considerations:
Biodiversity - Any site that falls within or so close to an international or national designation so as to cause significant harm will be discounted at this stage. International sites comprise Special Protection Areas (SPA), Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Ramsar Sites. Nationally designated sites comprise Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) including, National Nature Reserves (NNR). Regional and local designations will be considered at a later stage. Flooding - Any site (or part of a site) that falls within a functional flood plain (flood risk zone 3b) will be discounted at this stage. Sites falling within areas that are a lower risk / medium risk from flooding, or which fall within high risk (floor risk zone 3a) but not what is defined as ‘functional floodplain’ (i.e. they can be defended), will be considered at a later stage. Archaeological - Any site that would significantly affect a nationally important archaeological site will be discounted at this stage. Nationally important remains comprise Scheduled Ancient Monuments (SAM) and other sites of national archaeological significance. Regionally and locally important archaeological features will be considered at a later stage. Air quality – Any unoccupied site that falls within an existing Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) would be contrary to the objectives of the AQMA via the relevant air quality objectives, which are set to protect people’s health (and the environment).
Stage 2 – Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Detailed Site Considerations / Constraints:
12.54 Stage 2 will be structured in accordance with our statutorily agreed Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Framework. This is made up of SA Topics and Objectives covering environmental, social and economic issues. We will frame our criteria under the SA Topics. The criteria mainly focus on constraints and therefore risks of negative effects, which are a proportionate level of assessment at this stage and viewed to be SEA compliant.
12.55 A simple Red / Amber / Green assessment for most of these criteria will be used. The purpose of this scoring will be not only to compare sites, but also to report on their “likely significant effects” in order to comply with the SEA Regulations. A site with a high number of ‘red’ assessments (i.e. many risks of major negative effects) is unlikely to be suitable for allocation as a development site unless a shortage of more suitable sites results in insufficient allocations to reach the Core Strategy settlement target. The assessments may not capture all constraints, but any additional known constraints on particular sites can be included within the overall site assessment at Stage 3. Additional refinement and further investigations can also be carried out at the prioritisation stage if required.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 207 12
Red = potentially significant constraint and/or significant negative impact on the achievement of an SA Objective Amber = some potential constraint and/or negative impact on the achievement of an SA Objective Green = no known constraint and/or little negative impact on the achievement of an SA Objective
i. SA Topic 1: Population and Equality ii. SA Topic 2: Health and Well-Being iii. SA Topic 3: Accessibility / Community Facilities iv. SA Topic 4: Education / Skills Combined consideration due to overlaps in available and usable data.
12.56 A. Proximity to services:
Average Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) ranks of Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LLSOAs) within / adjacent to the site for “Geographical Barriers” (i.e. access to services). This nationally prepared indicator is made up of road distance to: a GP surgery; a supermarket or convenience store; a primary school; and a Post Office. Inherent limitations to this indicator will be borne in mind, however it is a good starting point for consideration of accessibility and bolstered by application of the settlement hierarchy in Stages 1 and 3. Within the top 20% (inclusive) most deprived LLSOAs = Red, between 20% and 40% most deprived = Amber, less than 40% most deprived (i.e. 40.001% or greater) = Green.
12.57 B. Greenspace
Accessibility to Greenspace – from the Greenspace Audit (local = within 280m, neighbourhood or borough = within 840m) a simple Yes/No where Red = no accessibility to greenspace and Green = accessible to greenspace
12.58 C. Other Leisure
Proximity to leisure facility – this will only be able to account for Council-owned leisure facilities. It will be based on whether or not the site is within a settlement or connecting settlement which has a leisure facility = Green, vs. no leisure facility present = Amber.
12.59 D. School Capacity
Settlements with a current or projected deficit in primary and/or secondary school capacity. Current pupil numbers and the capacity for each school in the borough are compared to show excess/deficit capacity. This criterion allows us to report the potential effect on school capacity without mitigation (e.g. a developer contribution). Within a settlement area with an existing deficit in both primary and secondary capacity = Red. Within a settlement at full capacity or with a deficit in either primary or secondary capacity = Amber. Within a settlement with available capacity in both primary and secondary education = Green.
12.60 E. Access to PROW Network
Sites which have footpaths or other Public Rights of Way (PROW) within their boundaries have the potential benefit of improved accessibility, but also may negatively affect their use through
208 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 diversions or reduced visual amenity. Therefore, a simple “yes / no” scoring will be used for this criterion, and it will inform the consideration of cumulative effects later in the SA process. Site includes or is within 100 m of the PROW network = Yes. Site is beyond 100 m of the PROW network = No.
12.61 F. National Cycle Network or Long-Distance Trail
Access to the National Cycle Network (NCN) or long-distance trails (Long-Distance Walkers Association mapping). Sites within 5 km of the Trans-Pennine trail or NCN Route 6 or 2 km of a long-distance trail = Green. All other sites = Amber. (Red does not apply.) i. SA Topic 5: Economy and Employment
12.62 G. Access to Employment
Situation relative to settlement hierarchy, accessible by public transport. Within Rotherham town or a Principal Settlement (for growth or recognised Principal Settlement) = Green. Other settlements = Yellow. Isolated locations = Red.
12.63 H. Infrastructure (Non-Transport)
Sites have been assessed by Severn Trent Water / Yorkshire Water re sewerage and water capacity constraints which they have scored Red where significant capacity issues occur, Amber where more minor capacity issues occur (both of which may be overcome by phasing or additional infrastructure work), and Green where there are no capacity issues. i. SA Topic 6: Transport and Emissions
12.64 I. Highways / Site Accessibility
The Rotherham MBC transport section has assessed each site re the ease of access from/to the current highway network. Significant access problems = Red, Some access issues = Amber, No access problems = Green.
12.65 J. Transport / Accessibility:
New development should be located in highly accessible locations such as town and district centres or on key bus corridors which are well served by a variety of travel modes (but principally by public transport). The South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE) have been supplied with details of the majority of potential development sites and have assessed using their LUTI (Land Use and Transport Integration) modelling software to identify possible impact on the public transport network and accessibility issues which would require mitigation. High Impact = Red, Medium Impact = Amber, Low Impact = Green. i. SA Topic 7: Biodiversity
12.66 K. Biodiversity
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 209 12
Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) – RMBC ecologist has surveyed many of the sites and given an assessment on potential impact of any development on local wildlife sites and any mitigation that may be required. High Impact = Red, Medium Impact = Amber, Low Impact = Green (sites not surveyed given Amber rating if within 100m of LWS) Local Nature Reserves - Site on / overlapping = Red, site close to (within 250m) = Amber, other = Green. Ancient woodland - Site on / overlapping = Red, site close to (within 250m) = Amber, other = Green. We also have a number of candidate status site designations (cLWS, cLNR) where there is potential for biodiversity interest. Sites which fall wholly, or in part, within these candidate sites will be assessed as Amber to highlight potential impact, other = Green. Protected Species Assessment – Site with record of species with highest level of ecological importance = Red, site with species recorded of medium ecological importance = Amber, site with no records or species of low ecological importance = Green
12.67 Ecological Network data work is on-going but when available, will also need to be taken into consideration.
i. SA Topic 8: Air Quality
12.68 L. Air Quality
Air quality is mostly caused by traffic so any development in or close to Air Quality Management Areas (AQMA’s) is likely to have an impact. Site within AQMA = Red, site close (within 250m) to an AQMA = Amber, site not in or close to an AQMA = Green
i. SA Topic 9: Water Resources
12.69 M. Potential to Modify a Water Body
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) indirectly requires that water bodies are not significantly deteriorated via physical modification. Development which abuts or is in very near proximity to water bodies may involve replacing important natural features with hard-standing areas, including buildings or infrastructure. In the case of brownfield sites along watercourses or adjacent to water bodies, it can be assumed that such natural features have already been removed. Therefore, the scoring is: Greenfield site within or adjacent to a known (i.e. mapped) water body or within a flood risk zone = Red, Greenfield site not adjacent but within 50 m = Amber, beyond 50 m = Green.
12.70 N. Groundwater Sources
Groundwater Source Protection Zones (SPZs) allow the Environment Agency to prevent potentially hazardous activities from harming water which eventually flows to groundwater abstraction points. Brownfield sites tend to be former industrial or commercial land, and therefore any conversion to housing would generally represent a less hazardous land use. Greenfield or economic (employment) site within SPZ I = Red. Greenfield or economic site within SPZ II or III = Amber. Brownfield site intended for housing (only!) within any SPZ or not within an SPZ = Green.
210 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 i. SA Topic 10: Soil and Geology
12.71 O. Soil
Agricultural land is classified into five grades, Grade one is best quality, whilst grade five is the poorest quality. Sites in Grade 1 = Red, sites in 2 = Amber, sites in 3 (or less including urban areas) = Green Rotherham has traditionally been very successful in building on previously developed land / brownfield sites but the supply of these is now insufficient to fulfil the identified need over the plan period. Brownfield sites remain the preferred option in most cases. Greenfield Site = Red, Mixed Site = Amber, Brownfield Site = Green.
12.72 P. Geodiversity
Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS) – Site on / overlapping RIGS = Red, site close to RIGS (within 250m) = Amber, other = Green. We also have a number of candidate status site designations (cLGS, cRIGS) where there is potential for biodiversity / geodiversity interest. Sites which fall wholly, or in part, within these candidate sites will be assessed as Amber to highlight potential impact, other = Green. i. SA Topic 11: Flood Risk
12.73 Q: Flood Risk
Sites falling within a functional floodplain will already have been discounted but a risk of flooding exists to some extent in all areas. High risk (Zone 3a) = Red, Low to medium risk (Zone 2) = Amber, Little or no risk (Zone 1) = Green. i. SA Topic 12: Waste and Mineral Resources
12.74 R. Waste
Access to recycling centre. Although this is not a true constraint, development which is not accessible to recycling centres which take in more types of recyclable waste than roadside collections may reduce the overall sustainable waste management performance of the borough. Within a settlement having a Council recycling centre = Green. Settlement not having a recycling centre = Amber.
12.75 S. Minerals
Mineral Safeguarding Areas (MSA’s) – development on sites that lie within or close to a MSA could result in unnecessary sterilisation of economic reserves. Simple Amber / Green split used for this indicator as MSA’s cover a significant portion of the borough. Site within a MSA = Amber, site outside a MSA = Green. Coal Mining Referral Areas – The Coal Authority has defined new Coal Mining Development Referral Areas. These are areas, based upon Coal Authority records, where the potential land stability and other safety risks associated with former coal mining activities are likely to be greatest. Due to widespread coal mining in the borough over many years these cover a significant
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 211 12
proportion of sites. Simple Amber / Green split used for this indicator. A site within = Amber, site outside = Green
i. SA Topic 13: Landscape and Townscape
12.76 T. General Landscape
Landscape Sensitivity – all Green Belt areas in the borough have been assessed for sensitivity to development. Sites considered with medium-high or high sensitivity = Red, medium sensitivity = Amber, low or low-medium sensitivity to development = Green. Sites falling within the built area are given a green rating at this stage.
12.77 U. Designated Landscapes
Proximity to Area of High Landscape Value or Country Parks – these landscapes are enjoyed for the quality of their setting and views, as well as any recreational assets within them. Development in view of these sites may reduce the extent of their enjoyment by all; however most sites can be developed sympathetically, given an appropriate size, shape and density. Within 100 m (inclusive) of an Area of High Landscape Value or Country Park = Amber. Beyond 100 m = Green.
12.78 V. Townscape
Loss of essential greenspace or Tree Preservation Orders (TPO) – these features tend to create a very strong component of townscape. (Other townscape issues must be dealt with by looking at sites ‘in combination’ during later SA tasks.) Loss of well used or culturally significant greenspace, or many (approx. 10+) TPO trees = Red, Loss of other greenspace or less than ten TPO trees = Amber, No loss of greenspace or TPO trees = Green.
i. SA Topic 14: Historic Environment
12.79 W. Historic and Built Environment
Archaeology – sites containing archaeological remains of national significance will already have been discounted at Stage 1. South Yorkshire Archaeology Society recommendations: Major archaeological objections = Red, potential archaeological objections = Amber, little or no (or uncertain) archaeological objections = Green. Potential impact on listed buildings and/or historic parks and gardens. Conservation officer assessment on most important grade 1 or 2* otherwise by proximity - High Impact = Red, Medium Impact = Amber, Low Impact = Green Conservation Areas – sites which are within or in close proximity to Conservation Areas can result in development which deteriorates their historic character or setting. Sites in conservation area = Red, within 50m = Amber, others = Green.
Results:
12.80 All sites are carried forward to the Stage 3 prioritisation stage and they are given an overall SA rating – one for socio-economic constraints / concerns and one for environmental constraints / concerns. There may be sites which have just one particular constraint which cannot be overcome
212 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 / mitigated against and therefore renders the site totally unsuitable for development. Similarly a site may have several constraints but they may be more minor in nature and more easily be addressed with mitigation measures. However, as a general rule, sites with a lower number of ‘Red’ assessment scores will be more likely to be given a more favourable overall assessment.
12.81 Note: SA / SEA requirements are met through the consideration of the various sustainability criteria and scoring applied, but it is not required that the “most sustainable” sites are inevitably selected. In particular, policy or other (e.g. community) considerations during Stage 3 can lead to the selection of sites which do not perform as others under the SA Topics / Framework. However, it is required that the SA Report explains how environmental considerations were taken into account when making these decisions.
Stage 3 –Site Prioritisation:
12.82 A. SA Socio-economic:
Overall sustainability assessment for socio-economic constraints / measures. Scores poorly on many indicators or has a major constraint which may be impossible to overcome = Red. Scores poor / moderately on some indicators but any constraints can be mitigated against = Amber. Has very few constraints and which are minor in nature = Green
12.83 B. SA Environmental:
Overall sustainability assessment for socio-economic constraints / measures. Scores poorly on many indicators or has a major constraint which may be impossible to overcome = Red. Scores poor / moderately on some indicators but any constraints can be mitigated against = Amber. Has very few constraints and which are minor in nature = Green
12.84 C. Green Belt:
The Core Strategy has highlighted the shortage of suitable development sites available to meet the identified need and therefore some sites will be required to be allocated that are within the current Green Belt boundary. However the number of sites to be taken out of the Green Belt are too be kept to a minimum. Green Belt Site = Red, Part Green Belt Site = Amber, Non-Green Belt Site = Green
12.85 D. Urban Extensions:
As per Stage 1 any sites not falling within or close to defined settlements will already have been discounted. Urban extensions will be assessed based on type – i.e. edge of settlement which would extend the built up area further into the countryside = Red, edge of settlement but contained within the existing confines = Amber, within the existing built up area = Green.
12.86 E. Deliverability:
Any site proposed for development must be genuinely available and likely to be developed during the plan period and the NPPF requires that the council should maintain at least a five year supply of developable housing land. Sites are therefore more likely to be preferred if they are expected to be deliverable within a relatively short timescale. Sites which have some significant constraint(s)
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 213 12
but which can potentially contribute before the end of the plan period (and in the following years) = Red, sites which may have some constraints in the shorter term but likely to be available within first 10 years = Amber, sites available immediately or within first 5 years of the plan period = Green.
12.87 F. Town, District and Local Centres
National planning policy requires Council’s to allocate sites for main town centre uses in line with the sequential approach. Where site selection relates to main town centre uses (as defined in NPPF) the assessment will take account of the site’s location. Sites outside of town, district or local centres = Red, sites on the edge of town, district or local centres = Amber, sites within town, district or local centres = Green
12.88 G. Green Infrastructure Corridors
Many of the Green Infrastructure assets that contribute to Rotherham’s Green Infrastructure network will have been considered in Stage 2 when looking at detailed site constraints. However, to further consider the potential cumulative impact of development on Strategic and Local Green Infrastructure Corridors any sites falling within these will be given an Amber assessment.
12.89 H. HS2 Rail Route
The recent announcement of the go ahead of the high speed rail link shows the proposed route and an associated 200m buffer. Although the final route remains subject to further consultation any site that falls within the 200m buffer is given a Red assessment.
12.90 I. Other known constraints / issues
Sites may have a variety of other physical constraints to development, some of which may require mitigation or could render part or the entire site unsuitable. These include utility apparatus (e.g. phone masts, pylons) or contamination sources. Major constraints whole site = Red, minor constraints part/all of site = Amber, no known constraints = Green.
12.91 J. SA Cumulative Effects
The SA must consider the potential for cumulative effects (or combined effects) from different combinations of sites. These may lead to the need to consider different groupings of sites as alternatives, and this may include sites previously discarded. Red = SA identifies major adverse cumulative effect(s) in combination with other sites which render the site unviable. Amber = SA identifies adverse cumulative effect(s) in combination with other sites which can be reduced or overcome with mitigation. Green = SA does not identify any change to the original SA of this site.
Final Results:
12.92 The best performing sites when measured against these criteria and based on current knowledge of constraints will be recommended for allocation for future development, subject to reaching the targets set out for each settlement grouping within the Core Strategy. The number of new housing allocations will depend upon the number of homes proposed for the settlement and the
214 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 number of homes that already have an outstanding planning permission. Some otherwise suitable sites may therefore be discounted at this stage if a sufficient number of outstanding permissions already exist (with additional to allow for choice). However, consideration will also need to be given to the identification of some sites as safeguarded land to meet identified needs for 5 years beyond the end of the plan period (Policy CS5). New or further evidence on constraints and possible mitigation could alter the scoring / outcome in the future.
12.93 For those sites that are being proposed to be taken out of the Green Belt a further consideration will be undertaken in respect of the four Green Belt purposes. A site which falls within a parcel of land that scored ‘Red’ against either (or both) purposes 1 and 3 or purposes 2 and 4 in the Strategic Green Belt Review will be subject to a detailed assessment of that site using the criteria used in the Strategic Green Belt Assessment. This can then be used as part of the overall site assessment and in comparing potential Green Belt sites, but should not override broader sustainability considerations.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 215 13
13 Glossary
13.1 Accessibility: The ability of people to move around areas and reach places and facilities.
13.2 (The) Act: The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
13.3 Affordable housing: Housing accessible to households who cannot afford open market rental or purchase. It includes a range of tenures, i.e. shared ownership, discounted market housing, key worker housing, subsidised social renting etc.
13.4 Aggregates - the mineral materials, such as sand or stone, used in making concrete.
13.5 Air Quality Management Area (AQMA): Air Quality Management Areas have to be declared by Local Authorities for any parts of their areas where the air quality is unlikely to meet Government objectives as set out in the Environment Act 1995, and where people are expected to be exposed to the poor air quality.
13.6 Allocations - Sites to meet future development
13.7 Annual Monitoring Report (AMR): The annual monitoring report will assess the implementation of the local development scheme and the extent to which policies in local development documents are being successfully implemented.
13.8 Area Action Plan: A type of Development Plan Document focussed upon a specific location or an area subject to conservation or significant change (for example, major regeneration).
13.9 Area of High Landscape Value: A local landscape designation used to identify land of particularly high landscape quality.
13.10 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land: Land in grades 1, 2 and 3a of the Agricultural Land Classification.
13.11 Biodiversity: The whole variety of life on earth; all species of plants and animals and the ecosystems of which they are part.
13.12 Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP): A plan which sets out proposals to protect and improve the places where trees, plants, animals and insects live.
13.13 Biomass: Plants and trees when used to create energy.
13.14 Broad locations for growth: Indicative areas of major development.
13.15 Brownfield (previously developed) land: Land that is or was occupied by a permanent structure.
13.16 Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM): This is a tool to measure the sustainability of non-domestic buildings.
216 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.17 Bulky goods: Retail categories that include furniture, whitegoods, electrical equipment, bedding, lighting, automotive parts, camping and outdoor equipment, tools, building materials and DIY and homemaker products.
13.18 Carbon emissions: Gasses, such as carbon dioxide, caused by burning fossil fuels in transport and energy generation which contribute to global warming and climate change.
13.19 Chain of Conformity: It is important that we make sure the inter-relationships between different LDF documents are clear and that the LDF as a whole is consistent with national policy. This consistency is commonly referred to as the ‘chain of conformity’.
13.20 Code for Sustainable Homes: Provides a set of national standards for the design and construction of new homes to reduce carbon emissions.
13.21 Combined heat and power: The use of a heat engine or a power station to simultaneously generate both electricity and useful heat.
13.22 Community Infrastructure Levy: A form of planning gain tax, where a proportion of the increase in value on land as a result of planning permission is used to finance the supporting infrastructure, such as schools and will 'unlock housing growth'
13.23 Community Strategy: Although no longer a statutory requirement, Local Authorities can prepare Community Strategies with aim of improving the social, environmental and economic well being of their areas. In Rotherham the Community Strategies is prepared by the Local Strategic Partnership, which includes local authority representatives.
13.24 Comparison goods: These can be described as goods that consumers buy at infrequent intervals and normally would compare prices before buying eg. TV, fridges, clothes etc.
13.25 Conservation Area: An area, usually part of a settlement, designated by a local planning authority for preservation or enhancement because of its special architectural or historic interest under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, 1990.
13.26 Contextual indicators: Measure changes in the wider social, economic, and environmental background against which policies operate. They help to relate policy outputs to the local area.
13.27 Convenience goods: A consumer item that is widely-available, purchased frequently and with minimal effort. Examples of convenience goods include newspapers and sweets.
13.28 Core Strategy: Sets out the long-term spatial vision for the local planning authority area, the spatial objectives and strategic policies to deliver that vision. The core strategy will have the status of a development plan document.
13.29 Density: The number of buildings in a given area. In the Local Plan it is used mainly in relation to housing, being expressed as dwellings per hectare or ‘dph’.
13.30 Department for Communities & Local Government (DLCG): Established in 2006 as the successor to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, DCLG is the Government department for
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 217 13
communities and local government and has policy responsibility for (amongst others) planning, urban regeneration and building regulations.
13.31 Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (Defra): The government department responsible for environmental protection, food production and standards, agriculture, fisheries and rural communities.
13.32 Designations: Areas of land where specific policies apply.
13.33 Development Plan: As set out in Section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, an authority’s development plan consists of the relevant regional spatial strategy (for Yorkshire and the Humber Region) and the development plan documents contained within its Local Plan. It sets out the local planning authority’s policies and proposals for the development and use of land and buildings in the authority’s area.
13.34 Development Plan Documents (DPD): Spatial planning documents that undergo independent examination. They can include a core strategy, site specific allocations of land, generic development control policies, and area action plans (where needed). Proposals will all be shown on a proposals map for the borough. Individual development plan documents or parts of a document can be reviewed independently from other development plan documents. Each authority must set out the programme for preparing its development plan documents in the local development scheme. A development plan document is used to make decisions on proposals for development.
13.35 Ecosystem: A biological environment consisting of all the organisms living in a particular area, as well as all the physical components of the environment with which the organisms interact, such as air, soil, water and sunlight.
13.36 Ecosystem Services: The benefits that we derive from the natural world and its constituent ecosystems, including products like food, fibre, wood and water; services like pollination, nutrient cycling, soil formation, water purification, flood defence and opportunities for reflection and recreation.
13.37 Energy crops: Energy crops are a carbon neutral energy source and when substituted for fossil fuels can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to renewable energy generation. An examples of an energy crop is short rotation coppice (e.g. willow and poplar), which is densely planted and then harvested on a 2-5 year cycle.
13.38 Equality impact assessment: A process designed to ensure that a policy, project or scheme does not discriminate against any disadvantaged or vulnerable people.
13.39 Essential Infrastructure: In relation to flood risk, this comprises essential transport infrastructure (including mass evacuation routes) which has to cross the area at risk; essential utility infrastructure which has to be located in a flood risk area for operational reasons, including electricity generating power stations and grid and primary substations; and water treatment works that need to remain operational in times of flood; wind turbines.
13.40 European Landscape Convention: This promotes the protection, management and planning of European landscapes and organises European co-operation on landscape issues.
218 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.41 Evidence base: Information gathered by a planning authority to support preparation of local development documents. It includes quantitative and qualitative data.
13.42 Front loading: Front loading encourages more active involvement of communities, stakeholders and commercial interests earlier in the Local Plan process than under the previous planning system. The aim is to seek agreement on essential issues early in the process. Where agreement is difficult to achieve, front loading allows the maximum opportunity for participants to understand each others’ positions and to negotiate a way forward.
13.43 Flood alleviation: The avoidance of the possibility of flooding by controlling the flow of water in rivers.
13.44 Flood and Water Management Act 2010: The Act aims to improve both flood risk management and the way we manage our water resources.
13.45 Geodiversity: The variety of rocks, fossils, minerals, landforms and soils, and all the natural processes that shape the landscape.
13.46 Green Belt: An area of open land where strict planning controls apply in order to check the further growth of a large built-up area, prevent neighbouring towns from merging or to preserve the special character of a town.
13.47 Greenfield: Land (or a defined site) that has not previously been developed. (Not to be confused with Green Belt.)
13.48 Greenhouse gas: components of the atmosphere that contribute to the greenhouse effect (the process by which an atmosphere warms a planet).
13.49 Greenspace: Breaks in the urban environment formed by open areas such as parks, playing fields, woodlands and landscaped areas. These spaces may exist as definable linear routeways, forming part of a network linking urban areas to the surrounding countryside.
13.50 Green infrastructure: The network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.
13.51 Gross Value Added (GVA): This measures the contribution to the economy of each individual producer, industry or sector - the value of outputs (goods or services) less the value of inputs (labour & materials) used.
13.52 Habitats and Species of Principle Importance for Biodiversity: The habitats and species in England that have been identified via the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 as requiring action in the England biodiversity strategy and which Local Authorities have a duty to protect and enhance.
13.53 Hazardous installations: Installations that use, manufacture or store significant quantities of hazardous substances that have the potential to cause serious harm to people on and surrounding the site.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 219 13
13.54 Health impact assessment: The process by which a policy, program or project may be judged as to its potential effects on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within the population.
13.55 Hectare: A metric unit of measurement equivalent to 100 metres x 100 metres or 2.47 acres (i.e. approximately one and a half football fields).
13.56 Highly vulnerable uses: In relation to flood risk, this comprises: Police stations, Ambulance stations and Fire stations and Command Centres and telecommunications installations required to be operational during flooding; Emergency dispersal points; Basement dwellings; Caravans, mobile homes and park homes intended for permanent residential use; Installations requiring hazardous substances consent. (Where there is a demonstrable need to locate such installations for bulk storage of materials with port or other similar facilities, or such installations with energy infrastructure or carbon capture and storage installations, that require coastal or water-side locations, or need to be located in other high flood risk areas, in these instances the facilities should be classified as ‘Essential Infrastructure’).
13.57 Housing Market Renewal (HMR): There are some areas of the borough where houses are unpopular, sometimes because of the design of the houses or the housing estate. This can result in houses becoming so unpopular that no-one wants to live in them. This is known as housing-market failure. Housing-market renewal is when we or the Government takes action to solve this problem. This can involve refurbishing existing houses, replacing existing houses with new ones or improving the local environment to make it more attractive to live in.
13.58 Housing trajectory: A means of showing past and future housing performance by identifying the predicted provision of housing over the lifespan of the Local Plan.
13.59 Independent Examination: An independent process where formal objections to a DPD made at Submission stage are considered by a government inspector. The Examination itself will be run by a government inspector. Many objections to DPDs will be considered through written comments made by the objector and the council. However, objectors have a right to make their case in person at the Examination if they choose.
13.60 Infill: Housing development that goes in the gaps between existing buildings.
13.61 Infrastructure: Physical services including water, gas, electricity, telecommunications supply and sewerage. It can also refer to community facilities, for example, schools, shops and public transport.
13.62 Infrastructure Delivery Plan: This will help direct growth to the most appropriate locations, and ensure that the different economic, social and environmental infrastructure needs of the borough’s residents and businesses are met.
13.63 Inspector’s Report: A report produced by the inspector (from the Planning Inspectorate) following the Independent Examination. This sets out the inspector’s conclusions on the issues considered at the Examination. The report will recommend to us if the DPD needs to be changed as a result and in what way.
220 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.64 Integrated Impact Assessment: A report which accompanies the Core Strategy and includes the Sustainability Appraisal, a Health Impact Assessment and an Equalities Impact Assessment.
13.65 Issues and Options: Produced during the early stage in the preparation of development plan documents.
13.66 Joint Waste Plan: Produced jointly by Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham councils and adopted on 8th March 2012, this provides a detailed planning framework to manage all types of waste in the three boroughs. It forms part of Rotherham's Local Plan and has the status of a Core Strategy.
13.67 Key Diagram: The diagrammatic interpretation of the spatial strategy, as set out in a local authority’s core strategy.
13.68 Landscape Character Area: A unique geographic area with a consistent character and identity, defined by geology, landform, soils, vegetation, land use, settlement and field pattern
13.69 Landscape Character Assessment: A way of assessing the appearance and essential characteristics of a landscape in terms of particular combinations of geology, landform, soils, vegetation, land use and human settlement.
13.70 Landscape Scale: This refers to action covering a large spatial scale and usually addressing a range of ecosystem processes, conservation objectives and land uses (the Natural Environment White Paper 2011).
13.71 Landscape Scale Conservation: This is characterised by the pursuit of multiple benefits across a defined area (eg water quality, biodiversity, access). The best examples links to wider economic and social priorities where enhancing nature can provide benefits to the local economy and quality of life (the Natural Environment White Paper 2011).
13.72 Less vulnerable uses: In relation to flood risk, this comprises: Police, ambulance and fire stations which are not required to be operational during flooding; Buildings used for: shops; financial, professional and other services; restaurants and cafes; hot food takeaways; offices; general industry; storage and distribution; non–residential institutions not included in ‘more vulnerable’; and assembly and leisure; Land and buildings used for agriculture and forestry; Waste treatment (except landfill and hazardous waste facilities); Minerals working and processing (except for sand and gravel working); Water treatment works which do not need to remain operational during times of flood; Sewage treatment works (if adequate measures to control pollution and manage sewage during flooding events are in place).
13.73 Listed Building: A building that has been placed on the Statutory List of Buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest.
13.74 Local Development Document (LDD): The collective term in the Act for development plan documents, supplementary planning documents and the statement of community involvement.
13.75 Local Development Framework (LDF): See Local Plan
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 221 13
13.76 Local Development Scheme (LDS): Sets out the programme for preparing local development documents.
13.77 Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP): The LEP is based on a relationship between the public and private sector and a strong commitment to work together to ensure the growth of a rebalanced local economy. The LEP will be led by the private sector and will contribute significantly to the renewal of the national economy as a whole.
13.78 Local Nature Reserve (LNR): A statutory designation made under Section 21 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, and amended by Schedule 11 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.
13.79 Local Plan: The name for the portfolio of local development documents and related documents. It consists of development plan documents, supplementary planning documents, a statement of community involvement, the local development scheme and annual monitoring reports. It may also include local development orders and simplified planning zone schemes. Together all these documents will provide the framework for delivering the spatial planning strategy for a local authority area. The Local Plan was previously referred to as the Local Development Framework.
13.80 Local Service Centre: Where there are opportunities for sustainable development these will be pursued, but the settlement and growth strategy is mindful that the social infrastructure in these communities is more limited.
13.81 Local Sites: Including Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) and Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS). Non-statutory areas of local importance for nature conservation that complement nationally and internationally designated geological and wildlife sites. Local Sites are protected within the planning framework.
13.82 Local Strategic Partnership (LSP): Representatives from the public, voluntary, community and business sectors brought together with the objective of improving people’s quality of life.
13.83 Localism Act 2011: An Act of Parliament which made changes to the powers of local government in England.
13.84 Microgeneration: The production of heat and/or electricity on a small scale from a low carbon source, e.g. solar panels.
13.85 Monitoring: Regular and systematic collection and analysis of information to measure policy implementation.
13.86 More vulnerable uses: In relation to flood risk, this comprises: Hospitals; Residential institutions such as residential care homes, children’s homes, social services homes, prisons and hostels; Buildings used for: dwelling houses; student halls of residence; drinking establishments; nightclubs; and hotels; Non–residential uses for health services, nurseries and educational establishments; Landfill and sites used for waste management facilities for hazardous waste; Sites used for holiday or short-let caravans and camping, subject to a specific warning and evacuation plan.
222 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.87 National Character Areas: Divide England into 159 distinct natural areas. Each is defined by a unique combination of landscape, biodiversity, geodiversity and cultural and economic activity. Their boundaries follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision making framework for the natural environment.
13.88 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF): The National Planning Policy Framework sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. Council's must take account of the NPPF when preparing their Local Plans.
13.89 Non-bulky goods: Includes items such as clothes and footwear.
13.90 Non-potable water: Water that is not of drinking quality, but which may still be used for many other purposes.
13.91 Outcomes: Macro-level (global, national and regional), real world changes which are influenced to some degree by the Local Plan.
13.92 Output indicators: Measure the direct effect of a policy. Used to assess whether policy targets are being achieved in reality using available information.
13.93 Outputs: The direct effects of a policy, e.g. number of houses built, amount of employment floorspace developed, etc.
13.94 Plan, Monitor and Manage (PMM): Means of measuring and reviewing policy, involving the adjustment of policy through monitoring if necessary.
13.95 Planning Act 2008: This legislation was intended to speed up the process for approving major new infrastructure projects such as airports, roads, harbours, energy facilities such as nuclear power and waste facilities. The Localism Act 2011 also makes changes to the regime under the Planning Act.
13.96 Planning gain: The benefits and safeguards, often for community benefit, secured by way of a planning obligation as part of a planning approval and usually provided at the developer’s expense, e.g. affordable housing, community facilities or mitigation measures.
13.97 Planning Inspectorate: A government organisation which makes recommendations about the policies and proposals in DPDs through a formal Independent Examination. The inspectorate is a neutral organisation which arbitrates where people and organisations do not agree with the Council. They also check whether our proposals are in line with relevant government policy.
13.98 Planning obligations and agreements: A legal agreement between the Council and a developer which is needed before a development can go ahead. It will usually deal with things that need to happen away from the development site, including improvements to roads and open spaces.
13.99 Planning Policy Statement (PPS)/Planning Policy Guidance (PPG): National statements of planning policy prepared by the Government, but which have now been replaced by the National Planning Policy Framework.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 223 13
13.100 Policy implementation: Assessment of the effectiveness of policies in terms of achieving their targets. Measured by use of output and contextual indicators.
13.101 Policy directions: These pulled together broad issues that were taken into account in preparing the final policies for the Core Strategy.
13.102 Preferred Options document: Produced as part of the preparation of development plan documents for formal public participation..
13.103 Principal Settlement: Where there is a full range of social and community infrastructure to meet current needs but the opportunities for growth are limited.
13.104 Principal Settlement for Growth: Where new social infrastructure and community services exist, or are able to be provided as part of a major development scheme to support new growth opportunities
13.105 Proposals Map: A plan which shows policies and proposals for specific sites and locations. These are shown on an Ordnance Survey map.
13.106 Recycling: The reprocessing of waste either into the same product or a different one.
13.107 Regional Development Agency (RDA): Government-funded organisations in England that aim to ‘spread economic prosperity and opportunity’. This mission is delivered through a number of initiatives, including events, advice services and funding. The RDA's are being replaced by Local Enterprise Partnerships.
13.108 Regional Econometric Model (REM): The Regional Econometric Model is an economic database and model used within the Yorkshire & Humber region to provide historic and projected labour market information on employment, output, and productivity.
13.109 Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS): Sets out policies in relation to the development and use of land within Yorkshire and the Humber and forms part of the development plan. The Government has announced its intention to abolish Regional Strategies, and provision for this is made within The Localism Act 2011. Until such time as they are revoked by order under the Localism Act they remain part of the Development Plan.
13.110 Register of Historic Parks & Gardens: The register aims to 'celebrate designed landscapes of note, and encourage appropriate protection', so safeguarding the features and qualities of key landscapes for the future. Each park or garden included is of special historic interest.
13.111 (The) Regulations: Legal documents prepared by the Government. They provide detailed information about how acts should be applied, i.e. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.
13.112 Renewable energy: Energy obtained from naturally occurring sources that are essentially inexhaustible, unlike, for example, the fossil fuels, of which there is a finite supply. Renewable sources of energy include wood, wind and solar thermal energy.
224 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.113 Rotherham Renaissance: A project aimed at creating a vibrant Rotherham town centre which includes proposals for apartments, shops, outdoor cafés, and enhanced public spaces.
13.114 Safeguarded land: This is land which is set aside in case it is needed for development in the long term. It is not available for development in the short term because it is not needed. The need to develop safeguarded land will be considered when the Local Plan is reviewed.
13.115 Saved policies or plans: Existing adopted development plans are saved for a time period agreed with Government. The local development scheme should explain the authority’s approach to saved policies.
13.116 Scheduled Ancient Monument: This is a 'nationally important' archaeological site or historic building, given protection against unauthorised change.
13.117 Sequential approach: Considering options for sites for development in a particular order. For example, in terms of new shops, we would first look for sites within a shopping centre and then for sites on the edge of the shopping centre before looking at sites outside the centre. The same approach is applied to finding land for housing.
13.118 Settlement hierarchy: A way in which towns, villages and hamlets are categorised depending on their size and role. It can help make decisions about the amount and location of new development.
13.119 Sheffield City Region: This covers an area spanned by local authorities within South Yorkshire and the northern part of the East Midlands region. Over recent years, the Sheffield City Region Forum has overseen work in the City Region to increase the pace of economic growth through collaboration. Following Government's invitation to come forward with proposals to establish a Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP), a LEP was set up and the Forum stood down in 2010.
13.120 Significant effects: Effects which are significant in the context of the plan. (Annex II of the SEA Directive [see later definition] gives criteria for determining the likely environmental significance of effects).
13.121 Significant effects indicators: An indicator that measures the significant effects of the plan or programme.
13.122 Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI): Representative examples of nationally important wildlife and geology. SSSI are notified by Natural England under section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as being of special value for nature conservation and are legally protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act, as amended by the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 and the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006.
13.123 Sites & Policies Development Plan Document: Thiswill show specific development sites and contain policies to guide the release of land and design of new development.
13.124 Social inclusion: Making sure that everyone has access to services and opportunities no matter what their background or income.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 225 13
13.125 Soundness: At the Independent Examination, the inspector must assess whether the DPD is ‘sound’. This includes assessing whether the DPD has been prepared in the right way using the right procedures and if it is broadly in line with national planning guidance.
13.126 South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE): Responsible for the various public transport services in the sub-region.
13.127 Spatial planning: Goes beyond traditional land use planning to bring together and integrate policies for the development and use of land with other policies and programmes that influence the nature of places and how they function. Spatial planning includes policies that can impact on land use, for example by influencing the demands on, or needs for, development, but that are not capable of being delivered solely or mainly through the granting or refusal of planning permission.
13.128 Spatial planning zone: These are defined by considering various characteristics including housing markets and travel to work factors.
13.129 Statement of Community Involvement (SCI): Sets out the standards that authorities will work to by involving local communities in the preparation of local development documents and development control decisions.
13.130 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): This term is used internationally to describe the environmental assessment of plans, policies and programmes. This environmental assessment (the SEA Directive) looks at the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment.
13.131 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: These are a required part of the planning process and are intended to form the basisfor preparing appropriate policies for flood risk management at the local level.
13.132 Strategic Housing LandAvailability Assessment: This provides information on the opportunities that exist to meet housing need within a specified area over the Plan period. The information from the assessment will inform the Local Plan, but will not actually allocate land for housing.
13.133 Strategic Housing Market Assessment: Housing Market Assessments establish the level of need and demand for housing examining issues such as the particular accommodation requirements of specific groups, for example Gypsies and Travellers.
13.134 Strategic Road Network: This consists of motorways (such as the M1 & M18) and significant trunk A roads (such as the A57).
13.135 Sub-region: The administrative areas of Rotherham, Barnsley, Doncaster and Sheffield.
13.136 Submission: This is the stage at which people and organisations have the legal right to make a formal objection that will be considered by a government inspector. Submission also refers to the point at which the DPD is formally sent to the Secretary of State – which happens at the start of the submission consultation.
226 Sites and Policies Draft 2013 13.137 Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD): Provide supplementary information in respect of the policies in development plan documents. They do not form part of the development plan and are not subject to independent examination.
13.138 Surface Water Management Plan: A framework through which key local partners with a responsibility for surface water and drainage in their area work together to understand the causes of surface water flooding and agree the most cost effective way of managing that risk.
13.139 Sustainability Appraisal (SA): Describes the form of assessment that considers social, environmental and economic effects of plans and proposals. It includes the requirements of the SEA Directive, referred to above. This has to be produced at each main consultation stage when preparing Local Development Documents.
13.140 Sustainable communities: A sustainable community is one in which most of the services and facilities people need, including schools and shops, are easy to get to, preferably without the need to use a car.
13.141 Sustainable development: Development that has an acceptable or positive effect on the economy, the environment and social conditions, and which uses natural resources carefully. Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This concept offers the prospect of reconciling the pressures for growth with the need for conservation.
13.142 Sustainable settlements: See Sustainable Communities.
13.143 Targets: These are thresholds used to identify the scale of change to be achieved by policies over a specific time period (e.g. number of affordable homes to be built by a set date).
13.144 Transport nodes: Areas where transport links are concentrated or cross each other, e.g. bus and train stations, interchanges.
13.145 Tree Preservation Order: These are used to protect specific trees or a particular area, group or woodland from deliberate damage and destruction.
13.146 Unitary Development Plan (UDP): A document which is used to make decisions on proposals for development. The Rotherham UDP covers all the borough. Under the Act, the UDP will be replaced by DPDs.
13.147 Urban cooling: Cooling and shading provided by green open spaces can help counter the tendency of buildings, structures and hard surfacing to retain heat in urban areas as temperatures increase with climate change.
13.148 Urban Extensions: Significant development sites which have the potential to yield more than 500 dwellings.
13.149 Urban Potential Study (UPS): Studies undertaken to establish how much additional housing can be accommodated within urban areas.
Sites and Policies Draft 2013 227 13
13.150 Waste hierarchy: The principle that there are different levels of dealing with waste, ranging from the higher (more sustainable) levels such as reducing waste, re-using then recycling or composting, to the lower (less sustainable) levels such as burning and finally to landfill.
13.151 Water compatible development: In relation to flood risk, this comprises: Flood control infrastructure; Water transmission infrastructure and pumping stations; Sewage transmission infrastructure and pumping stations; Sand and gravel workings; Docks, marinas and wharves; Navigation facilities; MOD defence installations; Ship building, repairing and dismantling, dockside fish processing and refrigeration and compatible activities requiring a waterside location; Water-based recreation (excluding sleeping accommodation); Lifeguard and coastguard stations; Amenity open space, nature conservation and biodiversity, outdoor sports and recreation and essential facilities such as changing rooms; Essential ancillary sleeping or residential accommodation for staff required by uses in this category, subject to a specific warning and evacuation plan.
13.152 Wildlife corridor: An area, usually linear, of undeveloped land that links two or more sites or areas of natural or semi-natural habitat providing a safe route for movement of wildlife.
13.153 Windfalls: Sites for new housing that are not identified when allocating land in a development plan document but that may come forward for development during the Plan period. For example, the redevelopment of former industrial premises following unanticipated closure or relocation of a business.
13.154 Yorkshire and Humber Plan: See Regional Spatial Strategy
13.155 Yorkshire Forward: See Regional Development Agency
228 Sites and Policies Draft 2013