DOCSLIB.ORG

Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 Chapters 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Rotherham's Local Plan 5 1.2 Site Allocations for New Development 8 1.3 Development Management Policies 8 1.4 Designations and other Local Projects 9 2 Where are we now? 10 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Previous Stages of Preparation 10 3 Green Belt Review 13 3.1 Green Belt Review 13 3.2 Safeguarded Land 14 4 How have we Identified Site Allocations? 15 4.1 Summary of our Approach 15 4.2 Methodology 17 4.3 Evidence Base Studies 19 4.4 Site Changes Since 2013 Consultation 26 4.5 Meeting Core Strategy Settlement Targets 33 5 Integrated Impact Assessment 36 6 Designations and other Local Projects 38 6.1 Local Wildlife Sites 38 6.2 Regionally Important Geological Sites 38 6.3 Area of High Landscape Value 38 6.4 Conservation Areas 39 6.5 Green Infrastructure Assets 39 7 Policies Map 41 8 Draft Development Management Policies 43 Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 8.1 Development Within the Green Belt 44 8.2 Creating mixed and attractive places to live 52 8.3 Supporting a dynamic economy 56 8.4 Movement and accessibility 75 8.5 Managing the natural and historic environment 80 8.6 Creating safe and sustainable communities 123 Appendices : Proposed Sites 1 Proposed Development Sites in Rotherham Urban Area 146 1.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 146 1.2 Settlement Profile 147 1.3 Bassingthorpe Farm (Core Strategy Strategic Allocation) 150 1.4 Location Maps of Rotherham Urban Area 154 1.4.1 North West Rotherham 154 1.4.2 Rawmarsh / Parkgate 157 1.4.3 Aldwarke 159 1.4.4 Thrybergh 161 1.4.5 East Rotherham 163 1.4.6 Lower Don and Rother Valley 165 1.4.7 Rotherham Town Centre 167 1.5 Schedule of Sites 169 2 Proposed Development Sites in Dinnington, Anston and Laughton Common 174 2.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 174 2.2 Settlement Profile 175 2.3 Location Map of Sites 176 2.4 Schedule of Sites 178 3 Proposed Development Sites in Wickersley, Bramley and Ravenfield Common 181 3.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 181 Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 3.2 Settlement Profile 182 3.3 Location Map of Sites 182 3.4 Schedule of Sites 184 4 Proposed Development Sites in Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton and West Melton 186 4.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 186 4.2 Settlement Profile 187 4.3 Location Map of Sites 188 4.4 Schedule of Sites 190 5 Proposed Development Sites in Kiveton Park and Wales 192 5.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 192 5.2 Settlement Profile 193 5.3 Location Map of Sites 193 5.4 Schedule of Sites 196 6 Proposed Development Sites in Maltby and Hellaby 198 6.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 198 6.2 Settlement Profile 199 6.3 Location Map of Sites 200 6.4 Schedule of Sites 202 7 Proposed Development Sites in Aston, Aughton and Swallownest 204 7.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 204 7.2 Settlement Profile 205 7.3 Location Map of Sites 206 7.4 Schedule of Sites 208 8 Proposed Development Sites in Swinton and Kilnhurst 210 8.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 210 8.2 Settlement Profile 211 8.3 Location Map of Sites 212 8.4 Schedule of Sites 214 Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 9 Proposed Development Sites in Catcliffe, Orgreave, Treeton and Waverley 215 9.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 215 9.2 Settlement Profile 216 9.3 Location Map of Sites 217 9.4 Schedule of Sites 219 10 Proposed Development Sites in Thurcroft 221 10.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 221 10.2 Settlement Profile 221 10.3 Location Map of Sites 222 10.4 Schedule of Sites 224 11 Proposed Development Sites in Non-Green Belt Villages : Thorpe Hesley, Todwick, Harthill, Woodsetts and Laughton-en-le-Morthen 225 11.1 Settlement Targets (from Core Strategy) 225 11.2 Settlement Profiles 226 11.3 Location Map of Sites 227 11.4 Schedule of Sites 235 12 Methodology: Identification of Site Allocations 237 13 Retail Centres 256 14 Glossary 266 Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 1 Introduction 1.1 Rotherham's Local Plan 1.1 Rotherham’s Local Plan will guide future development in the Borough until 2028. It is progressively replacing Rotherham's existing Unitary Development Plan (UDP). The Council is preparing its Local Plan in two key stages these are the Core Strategy and this, the Sites and Policies document. Core Strategy 1.2 The Core Strategy sets the vision, objectives and strategic policies for the Borough up to 2028. The Core Strategy sets out, in broad terms, where new homes and jobs should be provided in the Borough. In doing so it sets targets for new housing and employment land for each of the Borough's settlements. The Examination in Public into the Core Strategy to ensure the soundness of the Core Strategy, was completed by June 2014. The Examination in Public was conducted by an independent planning inspector appointed by government. 1.3 The target for any given settlement depends on its position in the Core Strategy's 'settlement hierarchy'. This position is influenced by, amongst other factors, its relative size, role, availability of services and access to public transport and employment. The Inspector in his final report following the Examination in Public has determined the housing target for the Borough. The Borough assists in meeting the housing and employment requirements identified for the wider Sheffield City Region. 1.4 Local Plan documents must conform with the Core Strategy and the changes that are proposed within that document to ensure the Plan is sound. 1.5 Table 1 below shows the distribution of housing, employment and retail growth across the borough, as set out in the Core Strategy. Table 1 Distribution of housing, employment and retail growth Housing Provision Employment Provision Retail Provision Settlement Percentage Approx. Percentage of Approx. Gross square of borough Number of borough Hectares metres of requirement dwellings requirement of land floorspace Main location for new growth Rotherham urban area (including 38% 5,471 30% 71 7,500 sqm Bassingthorpe Farm Strategic convenience goods Allocation 11,000 sqm comparison goods (Rotherhamtown centre) Principal settlements for growth Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 5 1 Housing Provision Employment Provision Retail Provision Settlement Percentage Approx. Percentage of Approx. Gross square of borough Number of borough Hectares metres of requirement dwellings requirement of land floorspace Dinnington, Anston and Laughton 9% 1,300 16% 38 0 Common (including Dinnington East Broad Location For Growth) Wath-upon-Dearne, Brampton 9% 1,300 7% 16 0 Bierlow and West Melton Bramley, Wickersley and 6% 800 7% 16 1,500 sqm Ravenfield Common convenience goods Principal settlements Waverley 17% 2,500 18% 42 0 Maltby and Hellaby 5% 700 2% 5 0 Aston, Aughton and Swallownest 4% 560 8% 19 0 Swinton and Kilnhurst 4% 560 0% 0 0 Wales and Kiveton Park 3% 370 4% 9 0 Local service centres Catcliffe, Treeton and Orgreave 1% 170 5% 12 0 Thorpe Hesley 1% 170 0% 0 0 Thurcroft 2% 300 3% 7 0 Todwick 1% 170 0% 0 0 Harthill to meet the 0% 0 0 needs of Woodsetts smaller local 0% 0 0 service centres Other villages and other 0% 0 0 villages Laughten en le Morthen 0% 0 0 Harley 0% 0 0 Green belt villages 0% 0 0% 0 0 Note: The figures above are not ceilings. Sites and Policies Document 1.6 The role of the Sites and Policies document is to identify specific sites - the site allocations for each settlement to meet the Core Strategy targets, for new housing and employment land. In doing so, it will define the precise policy boundary for Rotherham's Green Belt. Chapter 7 includes 6 Sites and Policies Final Draft 2014 further drafts of the emerging development management policies that will guide determination of planning applications and implementation of the site allocations. 1.7 All comments received, have been read and relevant planning considerations taken into account in refining the policies in this document and in selecting the preferred site allocations. The Council has published a Feedback Report into the consultation in 2013 which is available to download from the consultation web portal. Responses to individual representations in the consultation portal have also been prepared and are published to coincide with this current round of consultation. 1.8 Decisions on planning applications will be informed by a series of environmental designations, such as local nature conservation sites. The Local Plan has high expectations for development’s role in delivering a net gain for biodiversity, demonstrating our commitment to sustainable development. This is necessary to overturn the cumulative impacts of development, population growth and climate change on our natural environment. Key delivery methods will include the use of the nationally accepted mitigation hierarchy and the creation of buffer zones between new development and important sites and sensitive features. 1.9 The Sites and Policies document supports the delivery of the Core Strategy, guiding the management of development. In terms of the natural environment this document will set out the expectations for conservation and enhancement for wildlife, geology and landscape, it will provide for the protection and expansion of our green infrastructure and it will ensure that development incorporates best practice for green design and construction and for sustainable drainage. 1.10 The Council is promoting changes to current Unitary Development Plan residential and employment allocations that remain undeveloped; specifically at Greenlands Plantation at Maltby known as the Muddies, (site reference LDF0276) where it is proposed to change the residential allocation to an Urban Greenspace designation to reflect the value of the site for Great Crested Newts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Policing-Policy-During-Strike-Report
    ' The Police Committee Special Sub-Committee at their meeting on 24 January 19.85 approved this report and recommended that it should be presented to the Police Committee for their approval. In doing so, they wish to place on record their appreciation and gratitude to all the members of the County Council's Department of Administration who have assisted and advised the Sub-Committee in their inquiry or who have been involved in the preparation of this report, in particular Anne Conaty (Assistant Solicitor), Len Cooksey (Committee Administrator), Elizabeth Griffiths (Secretary to the Deputy County Clerk) and David Hainsworth (Deputy County Clerk). (Councillor Dawson reserved his position on the report and the Sub-Committee agreed to consider a minority report from him). ----------------------- ~~- -1- • Frontispiece "There were many lessons to be learned from the steel strike and from the Police point of view the most valuable lesson was that to be derived from maintaining traditional Police methods of being firm but fair and resorting to minimum force by way of bodily contact and avoiding the use of weapons. My feelings on Police strategy in industrial disputes and also those of one of my predecessors, Sir Philip Knights, are encapsulated in our replies to questions asked of us when we appeared before the House of Commons Select Committee on Employment on Wednesday 27 February 1980. I said 'I would hope that despite all the problems that we have you will still allow us to have our discretion and you will not move towards the Army, CRS-type policing, or anything like that.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Green Belt Review April 2012
    Rotherham local plan Rotherham Strategic Green Belt Review April 2012 www.rotherham.gov.uk Rotherham Strategic Green Belt Review Contents 1. Introduction & Need for the Study ....................................................................................................2 2. Aim of the Study..................................................................................................................................2 3. Scope....................................................................................................................................................3 4. Planning Policy Context .....................................................................................................................4 5. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................7 6. Strategic Green Belt Review : Informing Local Plan Preparation .............................................12 7. Results................................................................................................................................................13 8. Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................13 Appendix 1 – Methodology Consultation...............................................................................................15 Appendix 2 – Stage 2: Criteria to assess parcels against Green Belt purposes 1-4 .....................22 Appendix 3
    [Show full text]
  • British Rail
    PRIVATE AND NOT FOR PUBLICATION BR.31262/D British Rail EASTERN REGION (Northern Area) ND PERIODICAL OPERATING NOTICE CONTAINING GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTICES SATURDAY 1 APRIL 1989 TO FRIDAY 2 JUNE 1989 INCLUSIVE For additional items during the currency of this booklet, see Weekly Operating Notices Section •IY. * *them. * I ITEMS PUBLISHED FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THIS NOTICE t e Note:— Items in this first section which have not been published in the Weekly m Operating Notice are additionally noted by a vertical line in the margin. s m a r k e d t h u DANGER DANGER s WARNING w i l l n OVERHEAD OVERHEAD LIVE WIRES o LIVE WIRES t a p p A.C. ELECTRIFIED LINES e LEEDS STATION—ELECTRIFICATION OF THROUGH ROAD a BETWEEN PLATFORM Nos 8 AND 9 r i The Overhead Line Equipment will be extended from the existing n equipment "B" route at Structure 46/48 (42 metres West of f Platform 8) to existing equipment at Structure 47/12 (75 metres East of Platform 8). Plus a short run off Spur to Platform 9 u between Structure 47/07 and Overbridge 4D (50 metres). t u From 00.01 on Sunday 19th, February the Overhead Line Equipment r will be Energised at 25,000 volts and must be regarded as being "ALIVE" at all times. e i The limits of energisation are:— s s From Overhead Line Structure EB 46/48 (Platform No. 8) to u Structure No. EB 47/12 (C. Line). e Overhead Line Structure EB 47/07 (Through Road/Platform No.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Voices of Frickley': the Struggles of the Miners at a Yorkshire Colliery, 1984-1993
    ... - 'VOICES OF FRICKLEY': THE STRUGGLES OF THE MINERS AT A YORKSHIRE COLLIERY, 1984-1993 J. E. Nightingale University of Sheffield Submitted for the degree of PhD, 1997. .. 'VOICES OF FRICKLEY': THE STRUGGLES OF THE MINERS AT A YORKSHIRE COLLIERY, 1984-1993 James Edwin Nightingale Submitted for the degree of PhD, the University of Sheffield, Department of History, October 1997. - ., 'VOICES OF FRICKLEY': THE STRUGGLES OF THE MINERS AT A YORKSHIRE COLLIERY, 1984-1993 James Edwin Nightingale In this study the author focuses on the actIvItles of the National Uniol1" of Mineworkers at Frickley Colliery during ten years of industrial conflict prior to the - pit's closure in November 1993. While the initial part of this period, the 1984-85 miners' strike, has been well documented by scholars, the conflict in the following years has received scant attention. Following the miners' defeat, the NUM members at Frickley played an important part in sustaining the tradition of niilitant trade unionism in the Yorkshire coalfield at a time of general retreat for the British labour movement. Other studies have concentrated mainly on the activities of union leaders and management figures when chronicling the confrontation in the coalfields."In contrast, a substantial part of the present author's account is based on the oral testimonies of pit level activists, thus aspects of the conflict that have been otherwise ignored or overlooked are brought to light. At the core of the study is the contention that the labour movement had become disabled by the defeatist notion of 'new realism'. Moreover, it is illustrated how the NUM leadership in Yorkshire, conventionally portrayed as being militant, was often instrumental in suffocating the resistance of the NUM rank and file as they challenged the authoritarian working practices being imposed by the management of the industry .
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Railway Record
    INDUSTRIAL RAILWAY RECORD The Quarterly Journal of the INDUSTRIAL RAILWAY SOCIETY COMBINED INDEX SECOND EDITION Volumes 1 to 16 1962 – 2007 RECORD No.1 to No.189 Assembled & Edited by Vic Bradley On behalf of the Combo Index Production Team for the benefit of all readers of this magazine. CORRECTIONS, GLITCHES, ERRORS and OMISSIONS are kept to a minimum but may still inevitably occur in a work of this nature. If you spot anything that you think needs attention, PLEASE DO SEND details of this to us ideally by email addressed to v.bradley[at]virgin.net www.irsociety.co.uk IRRNDX20.doc updated 22-Mar-2008 INTRODUCTION and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This “Combo Index” has been assembled by combining the contents of the sixteen separate indexes originally created, for each individual volume, over a period of some 45 years by a number of different people each using different technologies. Only in recent times have computers been used for indexing but, even for these, the computer files could not be traced with the exception of those for volumes 14 to 16. It has therefore been necessary to create digital versions of 13 original indexes using “Optical Character Recognition” (OCR), which has not proved easy due to the relatively poor print, and extremely small text (font) size, of some of the indexes in particular. Thus the OCR results have required extensive proof-reading. Very fortunately, a team of volunteers to assist in the project appeared out of the E-mail Group Internet Chat Site which is hosted by the IRS, and a special thankyou is certainly due to Richard Bowen, David Kitching, Martin Murray, Ken Scanes and John Scotford who each handled OCR and proofing of several indexes, to complete digital recovery of the individual published index texts for Volumes 1 to 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Colliery Distribution
    COLLIERY DISTRIBUTION THE EDISON SWAN ELECTRIC CO. LTD. 155, C H A R IN G ‘C R O S S R D ., L O N D O N , W .C .2 E l e c t r ic a l R e v ie w October 27, 1944 A .S.C .M . Steel Conduit is manu­ factured only by ALMA & CRANMORE TUBE C O . LT D . BARLOW. H. J. & CO. LTD. Accepted practice in the Lobster World is a ELECTRICAL periodical shedding of his casing. Until its renewal CONDUITS LTD. he is unprotected. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. LTD. GRIFFITHS. ISAAC & SO N S Accepted practice in the Electrical World is HILDICK & HILDICK permanent protection with A.S.C.M. Steel Conduit. McDOUGALL. JAMES LTD Worlds of difference? .... Y e s! SIMPLEX ELECTRIC CO. LTD. Comprising : Credenda Conduits Co. Ltd. SPEC F Y A N D USE Perfecta Tube Co. Ltd. Simplex Conduits Ltd. Stella Conduit Co. Ltd. A.S.C.M. METALLIC SEAMLESS TUBE C O . L T D . STEEL TUBE & CONDUIT CO. (Middlesbrough) Ltd. TALBOT-STEAD TUBE CO. LTD. TIPPER BROTHERS (Bilston) LTD. WALSALL CONDUITS LTD. Advertisement of the Association of Steel Conduit Manufacturers, 25 Bennett's Hill, Birmingham 2 October 21, 1944 vmELECTRICAL REVIEWcf Khcmhq Most of the Peaks of Achieve­ ment have been reached by the roping together of in­ trepid men in common adventure. W e have found that to be a sound business principle . a team spirit that quests ever upwards to fresh heights of attainment. LEADERS IK ELECTRIC HEAT - ft A WATER HEATING GRAMS : HEATRAE, NORWICH HEATRAE LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal the Russell Society
    JOURNAL OF The Russell Society Volume 21, 2018 www.russellsoc.org JOURNAL OF THE RUSSELL SOCIETY The journal of British Isles topographical mineralogy JOURNAL EDITORS David Green Malcolm Southwood 61 Nowell Lane, Leeds, 7 Campbell Court, Warrandyte, West Yorkshire, LS9 6JD, U.K. Victoria 3113, Australia. JOURNAL MANAGER Frank Ince 78 Leconfield Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3SQ, U.K. EDITORIAL BOARD R.E. Bevins, Cardiff, U.K. M.T. Price, OUMNH, Oxford, U.K. R.S.W. Braithwaite, Manchester, U.K. M.S. Rumsey, NHM, London, U.K. A. Dyer, Hoddlesden, Darwen, U.K. R.E. Starkey, Bromsgrove, U.K. N.J. Elton, St Austell, U.K. P.A. Williams, Kingswood, Australia. I.R. Plimer, Kensington Gardens, S. Australia. Aims and Scope: The Journal publishes refereed articles by both amateur and professional mineralogists dealing with all aspects of mineralogy relating to the British Isles. Contributions are welcome from both members and non-members of the Russell Society. Notes for contributors can be found at the back of this issue, on the Society website (www.russellsoc.org) or obtained from the Journal Editor or Journal Manager. Subscription rates: The Journal is free to members of the Russell Society. The non-member subscription rates for this volume are: UK £13 (including P&P) and Overseas £15 (including P&P). Enquiries should be made to the Journal Manager at the above address or via the Society website (www.russellsoc.org). Back numbers of the Journal may also be ordered through the Journal Manager. The Russell Society: named after the eminent amateur mineralogist Sir Arthur Russell (1878–1964), is a society of amateur and professional mineralogists which encourages the study, recording and con- servation of mineralogical sites and material.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Groundwater Rebound in the South Yorkshire Coalfield Using
    Technical Article Predicting Groundwater Rebound in the South Yorkshire Coalfield, UK C. J. Gandy and P. L. Younger Hydrogeochemical Engineering Research and Outreach (HERO), Institute for Research on the Environment and Sustainability, Univ of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK; corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The semi-distributed model GRAM (groundwater rebound in abandoned mineworkings) has been applied to part of the South Yorkshire Coalfield, UK, to predict the pattern of groundwater rebound, in particular the timing and rates of changes in mine water flows between abandoned collieries. The model is based upon the mining hydrogeologist’s concept of ‘ponds’ (discrete volumes of interconnected workings) and calculates water balances over time for all ponds in a multi-pond mined system. GRAM was successfully calibrated against observed groundwater levels over a 5 year period from 2001 to 2005 before being used to predict future rates of groundwater rebound, in accordance with different scenarios, including average, low, and high rainfall scenarios. The results reveal that it could take up to 22 years before an inflow of water occurs into the last remaining colliery in the area at Maltby, with the first surface discharge expected in approximately 15 years time from an old mine shaft. If Maltby is closed and pumping ceases across the area, then it could be 100 years before groundwater rebound is complete. Key Words: Abandoned mines; groundwater rebound; hydrogeology; mine water; modelling Introduction Records of coal mining in the South Yorkshire Coalfield date back to the 12th Century, with initially shallow workings confined to the exposed coalfield in the west where the Coal Measures outcrop over an area of some 2,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021 FOI 0168-21 Miners Strike
    Our ref: 168/21 I'm a postgraduate research student at the University of Sheffield writing to you regarding a request for information about West Yorkshire Police under Freedom of Information. I would please like to request access to information held on this subject: Policing of the industrial dispute between the National Coal Board and the National Union of Mineworkers in 1984-1985. In particular, I would please like to specifically request a copy of West Yorkshire Police's review of the policing of the strike. This document should be West Yorkshire Police's equivalent to the report submitted to the South Yorkshire Police Committee Policing The Coal Industry Dispute In South Yorkshire, 1984-1985; Derbyshire Constabulary's review was titled Focus On The Miners Strike. I would like to request the review of the policing in the West Yorkshire Police area. Electronic copies of this information would be preferable. Please see the attached documents. Unfortunately, West Yorkshire Police is unable to provide you all information within the document therefore redactions have been applied by virtue of Section 31(1) Law Enforcement, Section 38(1) Health & Safety and Section 40(2) Personal Information. Please see Appendix A for the full legislative explanation. Appendix A The Freedom of Information Act 2000 creates a statutory right of access to information held by public authorities. A public authority in receipt of a request must, if permitted, state under Section 1(a) of the Act, whether it holds the requested information and, if held, then communicate that information to the applicant under Section 1(b) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • TOPS LOCATION Handbooksg to ASSISTINKEEPI NG the SEPOBLI
    TOPS LOCATION HANDBOOKSg TO ASSIST IN KEEPING THESE POBLICATIONS UP TO DATE A NEW DATA -SET HAS BEEN ADDED lu 1HE INfrORMAtION DATABASE. THIS CONTAINS A LUMP. ETE LIST OF AL I IOCATIONS ADDED SINCL THE PUBLICATION, LAST , JANUARY,Ni HANDBmuKs. IHfrOF KIS1 IS IN NUMERICAL ORDER AND CAN BE ACCESSED PTON BY LOCATION NUMBER OR THE NAMEBY INPUTTINGI CAN ALSO BE USED IF 1H WHOLE LIST IS NOT REQUIRED. IT IS THE :INTENTION TO ADD FURTHER LISIINGs LOVERING AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS. SD IN ADDLO CNI *************************************************************************************************4********************* TH E TOPS LOCATION HANDBOOK IN STATION NUMBER ORDER FI * * ND * O * I * * S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * a TOPS LOCATION HANDBOOK IN STATION NUMBER ORDER - DR 2409/9 ISSUED JAN 1991 f Director of- Operations, Macmillan House, Platform 1, Paddington Station, LONDON W2 1PT. FMS/1/07 Page i TOPS LOCATION HANDBOOK IN NUMERIC ORDER INTRODUCTION This book is printed in numeric order and lists all locations giving all the necessary information to determine in which responsibility file a location belongs, which Area Manager is responsible for the location and the TOPS description of the location - "Abbreviated Station and Customer Name" which will appear on TOPS generated computer output. The information listed under the various column headings is as follows: 1. Location number, Location and Customer column headings are self- explanatory. 2. Terminal Type (TM:CIF') This code denotes the type of location and the facilities which are available; A - A BR Parcels Terminal which provides facilities for the acceptance and forwarding of Rail Express Parcels traffic, either at which parcels trains start or terminate, or where parcels vehicles (including postal vehicles and newspaper vans) can be attached and/or detached.
    [Show full text]
  • England Railways – London & North Eastern
    ENGLAND RAILWAYS – LONDON & NORTH EASTERN RLY - SL 313 14.08.21 page 1 of 39 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Great Northern (GN) (1-49), GN & LNW Joint (25-26), West Riding & Grimsby Joint (37,37A), Great Eastern (GE) (50-110), Norfolk & Suffolk Joint (83), Great Northern & Great Eastern Joint (111-114), Midland & Great Northern Joint (MGN) (115- 118), Great Central (GC) (120-148), Great Central & Midland/North Staffs Joint (132-133), South Yorkshire Joint (149), North Eastern (NE) (150-234), Swinton & Knottingley Joint (168), Tyne-Wear Metro (235), Hull & Barnsley (HB) (236-239), North British (NB) (240-247), Port of London Authority (286) and Other Railways (250-302). Cheshire Lines Committee (CLC), see LMS List Based on Bradshaws Guides (Brad), company timetables and my own research, with extra information from the RCHS Chronology (Quick), Clinkers Chronology, Chronology of London Railways (Borley), London Railway Atlas (Brown), Liverpool & Manchester Rly Atlas (Brown), Pre-Grouping Atlas (Ian Allan), Private & Untimetabled Railway Stations (Croughton), GB Rail Atlas (Baker), Closed Passenger Lines of Great Britain (1827-1947) (RCHS), Railways of Great Britain Historical Atlas (Cobb), Branch Line News & other publications. The England Railways tables are set out in 5 separate Lists based on the 4 major companies Nationalised in 1948 (Great Western, London Midland & Scottish, London & North Eastern and Southern) and London Transport. These are sub-divided into the major companies amalgamated at Grouping in 1923 & other railways. U: unadvertised or locally advertised station with purpose. h: heritage railway stations/halts; b: British /National Rlys (BR/NR) & predecessors & other rlys stations on lines that became heritage railways; in general only heritage railways operating wholly or in part on these lines (including goods only lines) are included; a few others not on former railways are included if considered to offer an ‘A’ to ‘B’ passenger service.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites & Policies Examination Green Space Assessment February 2017
    Sites & Policies Examination Green Space Assessment February 2017 www.rotherham.gov.uk 1 Table of Contents Page Introduction 3 Identifying the roles and functions of Green Space 3 Understanding the assessment maps and tables 10 Anston and Kiveton Park 12 Aston, Aughton and Swallownest 17 Brampton and West Melton 25 Catcliffe, Treeton and Orgreave 31 Dinnington and Laughton Common 39 Harthill 51 Hellaby, Bramley, Wickersley and Ravenfield Common 54 Maltby 64 Rotherham Urban Area – Brinsworth and Canklow 74 Rotherham Urban Area – Herringthorpe and East Dene 80 Rotherham Urban Area – Kimberworth Park and Greasbrough 86 Rotherham Urban Area – Rawmarsh 92 Rotherham Urban Area – Town Centre, Masbrough and Kimberworth 96 Rotherham Urban Area – Thrybergh and Parkgate 107 Rotherham Urban Area – Whiston and Moorgate 113 Thorpe Hesley 118 Thurcroft and Laughton en le Morthen 123 Upper Haugh, Kilnhurst and Swinton 130 Wales and Kiveton 139 Wath upon Dearne 147 Other areas – Blackburn, Harley, Woodsetts 156 References in this assessment to Urban Greenspace refer to the current adopted Unitary Development Plan. In the Local Plan this is replaced by the term Green Space. References are made in this report to various other background and evidence documents which are included in the Local Plan examination library, available on our website: http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/localplanexamination/ Where references are made to specific sites considered as part of the Local Plan process (identified with a reference such as LDF0345) further details of the assessment is provided in the Submission Integrated Impact Assessment 2016 (examination library reference SD08. SD08D (1 and 2) includes maps of all sites considered by the Council in the preparation of its Local Plan.
    [Show full text]