DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics TITLE : ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINT S IN THE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS : Chapter 13: Georgia AUTHOR: LYNN RICHARD S THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION :* CONTRACTOR : San Diego State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Philip R . Pryd e COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-04 DATE : August, 24, 199 4 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U .S. Government have the right to duplicate written report s and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials fo r their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U .S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council fo r Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet - Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This report is part of a Council funded research project entitled Environmental Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics . Twenty one reports, listed below , resulting from this project will be distributed seriatim by the Council, and will collectivel y become the chapters of a book to be published in 1994 by Westview Press . Eighteen of the 2 1 (written by other authors) deal with the fifteen former republics, and three (written by Dr . Philip R. Pryde, the Principal Investigator) are summarizing reports . Chapter 1 : The Environmental Implications of Republic Sovereignty . (Pryde) Chapter 2: Russia - An Overview of the Federation . (Pryde) Chapter 3: European Russia . (Kochurov) Chapter 4: The Urals and Siberia. (Scherbakova & Monroe) Chapter 5: The Russian Far East. (Strand) Chapter 6: Estonia. (Soot) Chapter 7: Latvia. (Dreifelds) Chapter 8: Lithuania. (Kritkausky) Chapter 9: Ukraine. (Stebelsky) Chapter 10: Environmental Management in Ukraine . (Freeman) Chapter 11: Belarus. (Cherp & Kovaleva) Chapter 12: Moldova. (Dinu & Rowntree ) Chapter 13: Georgia. (Richards) Chapter 14: Armenia. (Valesyan) Chapter 15: Azerbaijan. (Wolfson & Daniell) Chapter 16: Kazakhstan. (Smith) Chapter 17: Turkmenistan. (Micklin) Chapter 18: Uzbekistan. (Lubin) Chapter 19: Kyrgyzstan. (Braden) Chapter 20: Tajikistan. (Eicher) Chapter 21 : The View to the Future. (Pryde) Environmental Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republic s Georgia Lynn Richards Executive Summary The following paragraphs summarize the main contents and conclusions of a chapter o n Georgia, which has been prepared as part of a larger work on the environmental an d economic-geographic situation in each of the former Soviet republics . The full study, edited by Philip R. Pryde, will be published by Westview Press under the title "Environmenta l Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics . Funding assistance from the National Council for Soviet and East European Research is acknowledged with appreciation . In this chapter, the history, physical geography and ethnography of Georgia is briefly summarized, followed by a survey of its main economic resources and any significan t environmental constraints (climatic, geomorphologic, etc .) that affect the country' s development. The contemporary state of the development of industry and agriculture within th e republic is reviewed, with a focus on the environmental disruption that has resulted from thi s development. The current situation with regard to biotic preservation is also reviewed , including the establishment of nature reserves and parks, and the potential for ecotourism . The administrative structure for environmental management within the country is also briefl y examined, as are non-governmental environmental efforts by the Georgian Greens and others . Particular discussion is directed to the ethnic conflicts that currently exist within Georgia , as well as to such environmental problems as air and water pollution, loss of biotic resources , poor agricultural practices, and pollution of the Black Sea. Georgia's energy supply problem s are also reviewed . The main conclusion of the chapter is that the future of Georgia is heavily dependent o n finding an acceptable solution to the ethnic conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia . If this can be done, Georgia's future could be quite promising, as it has adequate natural resources, goo d human resources, and an exceptional potential for attracting international tourism . Philip R . Pryde, June 6, 1994 Chapter 13 . GEORGIA Lynn Richards Georgia (which refers to itself as the Sakartvelos Respublika) is the westernmost of th e three Transcaucasian republics of the former Soviet Union, and the only one of the three fronting on the Black Sea . It includes, under Soviet classification, two autonomous republics , Abkhazia and Ajaria, and one autonomous region, South Ossetia (Figure 13 .1) . Georgia is home to an ancient civilization, and its Black Sea coast was well known i n Roman times . A Georgian state dates from the fourth century BC, and Christianity wa s introduced in the fourth century AD . For the next millennium and a half, Georgia wa s occupied alternately by Persians, Turks, and Mongols, with only brief periods o f independence. In 1801, the core of the country came under the control of Tsarist Russia . Georgia was briefly independent from 1917 to 1921, but was forcibly joined to the USSR i n 1922 . Unfortunately, considerable ethnic unrest and armed conflict exists in two of Georgia' s three autonomous regions as this chapter is being prepared; only Ajaria remains peaceful . Because of the internal instability, Georgia has not yet been able to stabilize its economy as o f 1994. The environmental situation in Georgia stands out as one of the silent victims of the social and political strife in that country. Since 1991, some forms of pollution have temporarily decreased because of fuel shortages, ethnic conflicts, and consequent economic downturns . However, with few exceptions, rather little attention has been given to the environmenta l consequences of the collapse of the nation's political, economic and social infrastructures . Contemporary Ethnic Conflicts Georgia is characterized by tremendous ethnic diversity . Of Georgia's 5 .4 million people, 70.1% are Georgians (who traditionally refer to themselves as "Kartveli"), 8 .1 % Armenians, 6 .3% Russian, 5 .7% Azeris, 3 .0% Ossetians, 1 .8% Abkhaz, and less than one percent Ajar. The 1989 census counted 14 officially recognized national minorities in Georgia , nine of which represented more than 30,000 people (see Table 13 .1) . Ethnic conflicts have long plagued Georgia . Presently, the Abkhazians and Ossetian s present the most organized independence movements . Over the past seventy years, Georgia' s minorities have lacked equal access to political and economic power and faced social an d educational disadvantages, despite stated Soviet ethnic equalization policies . The result of thes e policies are being felt today as Georgia undergoes ethnic and nationality crises . 1 Table 13 .1 . Major ethnic groups in Georgi a 1989 pop'n Percent of Dominant in Georgia total Georgia n Ethnic group religion (1000s) pop'n (1989) Georgians Georgian Christian 3787 70 . 1 Armenians Armenian Apostolic 437 8 . 1 Russians Eastern Orthodox 341 6 . 3 Azerbaijani Shiite Moslem 308 5 . 7 Ossetians East . Orthodox ; Islam 164 3 . 0 Greeks Greek Orthodox 100 1 . 9 Abkhaz Islam; East. Orthodox 96 1 . 8 Ukrainians Eastern Orthodox 52 1 . 0 Ajars Sunni Moslem 30-50 <1 . 0 (Others) 50-100 1 + Georgia, total Georgian Christian 5449 100 Sources : Wixman, 1984 ; Schwartz, 1991 . Problems in Ossetia intensified in December of 1990 when regional elections wer e organized to form a new South Ossetian parliament . That same month, Zviad Gamsakhurdia , then president of Georgia, abolished the South Ossetian Autonomous region, arrested South Ossetian leaders and declared a state of emergency . Since then, a civil war, exacerbated by th e introduction of Russian Interior Ministry troops, has produced close to 100,000 refugees wh o have fled South Ossetia to North Ossetia or other parts of Russia (Jones, p . 31) . As of 1994 , the situation remains tense and unsettled . However, the conflict in Abkhazia has taken precedence over problems in South Osseti a and saps most of Georgia's political and social energy . While the Abkhazians represent only about 18% of the total population in the autonomous republic, they hold the majority of the seats in the local government through the old electoral laws established during the Stalin era . Vladislav Ardzinba (Rdinba), elected to the Supreme Soviet of the USSR in 1989, began t o govern in Abkhazia without the consent of Parliament in 1991 (Chagelishvili, interview) . In protest, the Georgian representatives stopped attending the sessions and tensions escalated . From December 1991 to January 1992 during the Georgian civil war, President Gamsakhurdia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rare Species of Shield-Head Vipers in the Caucasus
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2016. 1 (3): 11–25 RARE SPECIES OF SHIELD-HEAD VIPERS IN THE CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 03.10.2016 An overview is presented on shield-head vipers of the genus Pelias distributed in the post-Soviet countries of the Caucasian Ecoregion. The assessment presents the current conservation status and recommendations to vipers’ ter- ritorial protection. Key words: Caucasian Ecoregion, shield-head vipers, current status, protection. Introduction The Caucasian Ecoregion (the territory south- to-landscape descriptions (Tunieyv B.S. et al., 2009; ward from the Kuma-Manych depression to north- Tuniyev S.B. et al., 2012, 2014). The stationary works eastern Turkey and northwestern Iran) is the centre (mostly on the territory of the Caucasian State Nature of taxonomic diversity of shield-head vipers within Biosphere reserve and Sochi National Park) conducted the genus Pelias Merrem, 1820, of which 13–18 a study of the microclimatic features of vipers’ habitats species are found here. Without exception, all spe- including temperature and humidity modes of air and cies have a status of the different categories of rare- the upper soil horizon. The results were compared with ness, they are included on the IUCN Red list, or in thermobiological characteristics of the animals (Tuni- the current and upcoming publication of National yev B.S. & Unanian, 1986; Tuniyev B.S. & Volčik, and Regional Red Data Books. Besides the shield- 1995). In a number of cases difficult to determine the head vipers the Caucasian Ecoregion inhabit three taxonomic affiliation, in addition to the classical meth- representatives of mountain vipers of the genus ods of animal morphology and statistics, biochemistry Montivipera Nilson, Tuniyev, Andren, Orlov, Joger and molecular-genetic analysis methods have been ap- & Herrman, 1999 (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 18 July 2007
    United Nations S/2007/439 Security Council Distr.: General 18 July 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1752 (2007) of 13 April 2007, by which the Security Council decided to extend the mandate of the United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) until 15 October 2007. It provides an update of the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia since my report of 3 April 2007 (S/2007/182). 2. My Special Representative, Jean Arnault, continued to lead the Mission. He was assisted by the Chief Military Observer, Major General Niaz Muhammad Khan Khattak (Pakistan). The strength of UNOMIG on 1 July 2007 stood at 135 military observers and 16 police officers (see annex). II. Political process 3. During the reporting period, UNOMIG continued efforts to maintain peace and stability in the zone of conflict. It also sought to remove obstacles to the resumption of dialogue between the Georgian and Abkhaz sides in the expectation that cooperation on security, the return of internally displaced persons and refugees, economic rehabilitation and humanitarian issues would facilitate meaningful negotiations on a comprehensive political settlement of the conflict, taking into account the principles contained in the document entitled “Basic Principles for the Distribution of Competences between Tbilisi and Sukhumi”, its transmittal letter (see S/2002/88, para. 3) and additional ideas by the sides. 4. Throughout the reporting period, my Special Representative maintained regular contact with both sides, as well as with the Group of Friends of the Secretary-General both in Tbilisi and in their capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Action in the Caucasus: a Guide for Practitioners
    HUMANITARIAN ACTION IN THE CAUCASUS: A GUIDE FOR PRACTITIONERS Greg Hansen Humanitarianism and War Project & Local Capacities for Peace Project i Published by The Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies Brown University, Box 1970 2 Stimson Avenue Providence, RI 02912 USA Telephone: (401) 863-2809 Fax: (401) 863-1270 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Watson_Institute/ Thomas J. Biersteker, Ph.D., Director Frederick F. Fullerton, Writer/Editor Nancy Soukup, Writer/Editor George Potter, Staff Assistant Statements of fact or opinions are solely those of the authors; their publication does not imply endorsement by the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. Copyright 1998 by the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. All rights reserved under International and Pan American Convention. No part of this report may be reproduced by any other means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to Publications Group, Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies. ii CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................................................... v Author’s Note...............................................................................................................................ix Acronyms......................................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Security in the South Caucasus
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND SECURITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA Regional Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT CO-ORDINATION Within the framework of the project Climate Change and Security in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus under the Christine Kitzler, Dana Bogdan (OSCE) Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC), one of the four main activities aimed at identifying and mapping climate change and security risks in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the South Caucasus in a participatory way, the conclusions of which are presented in the current report for the South Caucasus. ASSESSMENT CO-ORDINATION Harald Egerer, Pier Carlo Sandei, Filippo Montalbetti (UN Environment), Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arendal) The Austrian Development Agency (ADA) has co-funded the project by providing financial resources for the project activities in the pilot region in the Dniester River Basin. Moreover, the ENVSEC initiative partners the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UN Environment, the United Nations Economic Commission for LEAD AUTHOR Europe (UNECE) and the Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) contributed their own resources to the Ieva Rucevska (GRID-Arendal) implementation of this project. CONTRIBUTORS AND REVIEWERS Nino Malashkhia (OSCE) Trine Kirkfeldt, Hanne Jørstad, Valentin Yemelin (GRID-Arnedal) Mahir Aliyev (UN Environment) Zsolt Lengyel (Climate East Policy) The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the ENVSEC partner organizations, their donors or the participating States. Participants in the national consultations that took place in the Republic of Armenia (Yerevan, 12 May 2014), the Republic of Azerbaijan (Baku, 30 May 2014) and in Georgia (Tbilisi, 8 May 2014) commented and contributed to the regional assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • S/2007/15 Security Council
    United Nations S/2007/15 Security Council Distr.: General 11 January 2007 Original: English Report of the Secretary-General on the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1716 (2006) of 13 October 2006, by which the Security Council decided to extend the mandate of the United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) until 15 April 2007. It provides an update of the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia, since my report of 28 September 2006 (S/2006/771). 2. My Special Representative, Jean Arnault, continued to lead the Mission. He was assisted by the Chief Military Observer, Major General Niaz Muhammad Khan Khattak (Pakistan). The strength of UNOMIG on 1 January 2007 stood at 127 military observers and 14 police officers (see annex). II. Political process 3. During the period under review, UNOMIG continued its efforts to prevent escalation of tensions, maintain stability and facilitate dialogue between the Georgian and Abkhaz sides. The agenda for the dialogue remained the three priorities endorsed by the United Nations-chaired high-level meetings of the Group of Friends in Geneva (see S/2004/315, paras. 5-7) and agreements between the Presidents of the Russian Federation and Georgia reached in Sochi (see S/2003/412, para. 5). Efforts and activities in this framework are aimed at improving confidence between the sides and facilitating meaningful negotiations on a comprehensive political settlement of the conflict, taking into account the principles contained in the document entitled “Basic Principles for the Distribution of Competences between Tbilisi and Sukhumi”, its transmittal letter (see S/2002/88, para.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus University Caucasus School of Governance
    Caucasus University Caucasus School of Governance SYLLABUS Course Title History of Georgia Course Code HIST 0003 Annotation of the course The course of History of Georgia covers the History of our country from the ancient period up to nowadays. Status of the Course Obligatory Optional ECTS hours School, Grade/Level/ Group School Caucasus School of Governance Teaching Grade B M D Group Semester I Lecturer Kakha Shengelia Working Place Caucasus University Academic Degree Professor Academic Position Full Professor Work Telephone 2 377777 Mobile Phone 595 149999 E mail [email protected] Consultancy Time After each lecture Preconditions to the course Non Format of the Course Class 26 hours 13 week, 2 contact hours per week Presentation 2 hours 1 week, 2 contact hours Midterm Exam 2 hours Final Exam 3 hours 92 hours Hours for independent work, including for Other the preparation for mid-term and final exams, as well as for the preparation of homework and the presentation 1 The main goal of the course History of Georgia is to familiarize students with the cultural heritage of Georgia from the historical angle. Students will define in clear way the stages of the development of Georgian civilization, society, culture, religion, literature, and art in the frame of the world civilization patterns. Special accent shall be placed on ideas of progress concerning different theoretical concepts. We shall all together examine the reasons of origin, development, and contribution of the Georgian Civilization in the cultural heritage of the humankind in retrospective. The course is designed so that it envisages team projects and pair activities to develop students’ team work skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Opposition to Soviet Rule (1956-1989) and the Causes of Resentment
    Georgian Opposition to Soviet Rule (1956-1989) and the Causes of Resentment between Georgia and Russia Master‘s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lisa Anne Goddard Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2011 Master‘s Thesis Committee: Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor Theodora Dragostinova Irma Murvanishvili Copyright by Lisa Anne Goddard 2011 Abstract This Master‘s thesis seeks to examine the question of strained relations between Georgia and the Russian Federation, paying particular attention to the Georgian revolts of 1956, 1978 and 1989 during the Soviet era. By examining the results of these historical conflicts, one can discern a pattern of three major causes of the tensions between these neighboring peoples: disagreement with Russia over national identity characteristics such as language, disputes over territory, and degradation of symbols of national legacy. It is through conflicts and revolts on the basis of these three factors that Georgian anti- Russian sentiment and Russian anti-Georgian sentiment developed. This thesis is divided into four chapters that will explore the origins and results of each uprising, as well as the evolving conceptions of national identity that served as a backdrop to the conflicts. Following an introduction that lays out the primary questions and findings of the thesis, the second chapter gives a brief history of Georgia and its relationship with Russia, as well as outlines the history and dynamic nature of Georgian national identity. Chapter three, the core chapter, presents the Georgian rebellions during the Soviet era, their causes, and their relevance to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus
    Open Journal of Geology, 2018, 8, 56-64 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Ancient Glaciation of the Caucasus Khazaradze Revaz, Kharadze Koba, Tsikarishvili Kukuri, Chartolani Giorgi Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia How to cite this paper: Revaz, K., Koba, Abstract K., Kukuri, T. and Giorgi, C. (2018) An- cient Glaciation of the Caucasus. Open The paper deals with important, different views on the old glaciation of the Journal of Geology, 8, 56-64. Caucasus based on the literary sources and the latest data obtained through https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81004 the expeditions. Our researches are mostly of complex character where petro- Received: December 8, 2017 graphic, palynological and paleontological methods are widely used. The pe- Accepted: January 20, 2018 trographic method allowed us to connect block debris of the moraine with the Published: January 23, 2018 main centers and to determine the directions of the glaciers movement and Copyright © 2018 by authors and their distribution boundaries. The palynological method was used to deter- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. mine the genesis of loose sediments considered as moraines and their sedi- This work is licensed under the Creative mentation conditions. The palynological spectrum of deposits shows that they Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). are river sediments and their sedimentation took place under humid, mod- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ erately warm climate conditions that is not associated with glaciation. Open Access Keywords Petrography, Palynology, Genesis, Sedimentation 1. Introduction The study of the Caucasian Isthmus, from the point of view of paleoglaciation, began in the second part of the XIX century [1].
    [Show full text]