Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 7 2. Study Area 9 2.1 Main Urban Areas 10 2.2 Infrastructure 10 2.3 Hydrology 11 2.4 Regional Geology 11 2.5 Topography 12 3. Policy and Local Context 14 3.1 National Policy 14 3.2 Local Context 15 4. SFRA Methodology 18 4.1 Description 18 4.2 Data Collection/processing 18 4.3 Stakeholders 18 4.4 Need for a Level 2 SFRA 20 5. Flooding From Rivers 21 5.1 Description 21 5.2 Data Collection 21 5.3 Historical Fluvial Flood Events 21 5.4 Assessing Flooding From Rivers 25 5.5 Discussion of Fluvial Flooding in Hart 27 5.6 Management of Fluvial Flooding in Hart 32 5.7 Planning Considerations 32 6. Flooding From Surface Water 33 6.1 Description 33 6.2 Data Collection 36 6.3 Historical Surface Water Flood Events 36 6.4 Assessing Flooding From Surface Water 38 6.5 Discussion of Surface Water Flooding in Hart 39 6.6 Planning Considerations 40 7. Flooding From Sewers 41 7.1 Description 41 7.2 Data Collection 43 7.3 Historic Sewer Flooding 43 7.4 Discussion of Sewer Flooding in Hart 49 8. Flooding From Groundwater 50 8.1 Description 50 8.2 Causes of high groundwater levels 50 Page intentionally blank 52 8.3 Impacts of groundwater flooding 53 8.4 Topography, geology and groundwater flooding 54 8.5 Data Collection 54 8.6 Assessing Flooding From Groundwater 55 8.7 Discussion of Groundwater Flooding in Hart 56 8.8 Climate Change 58 8.9 Management of Groundwater Flooding in Hart 58 8.10 Planning Considerations 58 9. Flooding from Artificial Sources 60 9.1 Description 60 9.2 Discussion of Flooding From Reservoirs in Hart 60 9.3 Discussion of Flooding From Canals in Hart 62 9.4 Management of Flooding From Artificial Sources in Hart 64 9.5 Planning Considerations 64 Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 10. Indicative Flood Problem Areas 66 10.1 Description 66 10.2 Data Collection 66 11. Causal Areas 73 11.1 Description of Causal Areas 73 11.2 Data Collection 73 11.3 Planning Considerations 77 12. Climate Change Allowances 78 12.1 Description 78 12.2 Environment Agency Best Practice Guidance 78 12.3 Applying Appropriate Climate Change Allowances in Hart 79 12.4 Determining Climate Change Allowances 79 12.5 Assessing the Impact of Climate Change Allowances in Hart 82 12.6 The Impact of Climate Change on Existing Development 86 13. Guidance on application of the Sequential and Exception Tests 88 13.1 Sequential Test 88 13.2 Exception Test 93 14. Site Specific FRA Guidance 96 14.1 Managing Flooding In New Development 96 14.2 Managing surface water runoff from new developments 97 14.3 The Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS) Approach 99 14.4 Flood Resistant and Resilient Design 107 14.5 Flood Hazard 108 14.6 Dry Islands 109 15. Emergency Planning & Flood Warning 111 15.1 Introduction 111 15.2 Emergency Planning 111 15.3 Flood Warning 111 15.4 Flood Warning Areas 113 15.5 Flood Alert Areas 113 15.6 Using Emergency Flood Plans in Planning Applications 115 16. Defences and Asset Management 116 16.1 Introduction 116 16.2 Defences 116 16.3 Maintenance 117 16.4 Works in or near a watercourse 118 17. Summary and Recommendations 119 17.1 Site Allocation Process 119 17.2 Council Policy 119 17.3 Emergency Planning 121 17.4 Future Updates of the SFRA 121 18. Glossary 123 19. Appendix 1 125 Tables Table 0.1 Responsibilities managing flood risk within Hart 4 Table 0.2 Statutory and/or non-statutory planning consultees for Flood Risk Issues (Source: The Town & Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 – Schedule 4) 5 Table 3.1 National Policies and guidance relevant to Hart and SFRAs 14 Table 3.2 Local level policy and guidance relevant to the SFRA 15 Table 3.3 Responsibilities for managing flood risk in Hart 16 Table 4.1 Key datasets collated for analysis 19 Table 5.1 Historic Flood events in Hart as captured in the previous SFRA 24 Table 5.2 Definitions of Flood Zones (Table 1, NPPG) 25 Table 5.3 SFRA fluvial flood zone mapping sources 30 Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Table 5.4 Factors that increase fluvial flood risk in Hart 31 Table 6.1 General factors that increase surface water flood risk 34 Table 7.1 Causes of flooding from sewers 42 Table 8.1 Causes of high groundwater levels 51 Table 8.2 BGS susceptibility to groundwater flooding classifications 56 Table 9.1 Properties at risk from reservoir failure 60 Table 10.1 Performance of the uFMfSW against historic data 67 Table 10.2 Performance of the FMfSW against historic data 67 Table 11.1 Surface water flood risk in Hart (based on FMfSW) 73 Table 11.2 Groundwater flood risk in Hart (based on BGS susceptibility to groundwater flooding) 75 Table 11.3 Fluvial risk based on the Environment Agency’s Flood Map for Planning 76 Table 12.1 Climate change allowances as per development vulnerability and flood zone 80 Table 12.2 Peak river flow allowances by river basin district (1961-1990 baseline) 80 Table 12.3 Peak rainfall intensities in small and urban catchments (1961- 1990 baseline) 81 Table 12.4 High ++ for peak river flows 81 Table 12.5 Indicative guides to an assessment approach for climate change 85 Table 12.6 Comparison of properties within ‘current’ and ‘future’ Flood Zone 3 86 Table 13.1 Flood Risk Vulnerability Classifications (NPPG, 2014) 90 Table 13.2 Flood Risk Vulnerability Classifications and Flood Zone ‘Compatibility’ (NPPG, 2014) 91 Table 14.1 Summary of SuDS Techniques and their Suitability to meet the three goals of Sustainable Drainage 101 Table 14.2 Drainage summary map classifications 105 Table 14.3 Flood Hazard (source Table 13.1 of FD2320/TR2- extended version) 109 Table 15.1 Environment Agency Flood Warnings 112 Table 15.2 River monitoring gauges in Hart 113 Table 16.1 Medium Term Plan 117 Table 17.1 Key policy recommendations 120 Figures Figure 1.1 Taking flood risk into account in Local Plan preparation (NPPG, 2014) 8 Figure 2.1 Study Area 9 Figure 2.2 Topography of Hart 13 Figure 5.1 Historic fluvial flood records across Hart 22 Figure 5.2 Fluvial flooding across Hart by flood event 23 Figure 5.3 Properties across Hart that fall within Flood Zone 3 28 Figure 5.4 Environment Agency Flood Maps for Planning 29 Figure 6.1 Factors that influence surface water flooding as per the source- pathway-receptor model 33 Figure 6.2 Occurrences of surface water flooding across Hart 37 Figure 6.3 Surface water flooding across Hart by flood event 38 Figure 6.4 Properties at risk of surface water flooding according to the Flood Map for Surface Water 39 Figure 7.1 Internal sewer flooding incidents in Hart 44 Figure 7.2 External sewer flooding incidents in Hart 45 Figure 7.3 Internal sewer flooding by postcode area 46 Figure 7.4 External sewer flooding by postcode area 47 Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Figure 7.5 Foul flooding incidents reported to Hart District Council 48 Figure 8.1 Winter 2013/2014 reported groundwater flooding incidents 55 Figure 8.2 Areas susceptible to groundwater flooding 57 Figure 9.1 Key features of Fleet Pond Reservoir 62 Figure 9.2 Raised embankments along the Basingstoke Canal 63 Figure 10.1 Properties located in the uFMfSW and FMfSW 1 in 30 flood extents 68 Figure 10.2 Properties in the FMfSW 1 in 200 extent vs. the uFMfSW 1 in 1000 extent 69 Figure 10.3 Mapped historic flood records against the FMfSW 70 Figure 10.4 Mapped historic flood records against the uFMfSW 70 Figure 12.1 Comparison of the 1 in 100 peak flow adjusted for each climate change allowance with the existing 1 in 1000 modelled flow 83 Figure 13.1 Sequential Test Flow Chart 89 Figure 13.2 Application of the Exception Test for Local Plan Preparation (NPPG Flood Risk and Coastal Change) 95 Figure 14.1 Infiltration SuDS suitability 106 Figure 14.2 Rationale for design strategies, improving flood performance of new buildings: Flood Resilient Construction, CLG 2007 108 Figure 14.3 A dry island in Fleet 110 Figure 15.1 Direct river alarm and groundwater alerts at Crondall 114 Prepared By: Susanna Hope (Flood Risk Infrastructure Engineer, Hart District Council) Amanda Dunn Principal Policy Planner (East Hampshire District Council on behalf of Hart District Council) Hart District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment December 2016 Executive Summary Introduction This report is a Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) carried out by Hart District Council (HDC). The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and associated National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) for Flood Risk and Coastal Change emphasise the active role Local Planning Authorities such as HDC should take to ensure that flood risk is understood and managed effectively and sustainably throughout all stages of the planning process. The NPPF outlines that Local Plans should be supported by a SFRA and Local Planning Authorities should use the findings to inform strategic land use planning. The purpose of a Level 1 SFRA is to collate and analyse the most up to date flood risk information for use by HDC to inform the preparation of robust planning documents as part of the upcoming HDC Local Plan.
Recommended publications
  • Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement Holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small Land Owners
    Hazeley Heath Consultative Group 22/08/2017 Victoria Hall, Hartley Wintney Present: Phil Maund (Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small land owners) Apologies: Leigh Wallace (Hart DC), Mike Coates (RSPB), David Sexton (Mattingley Parish), Julian Bishop (Commoners) 1. Minutes from previous meeting Minutes were considered and approved. 2. Matters arising Hart Ponds - PM: Previously awaiting confirmation if consent is required for new ponds, consent is not required if an existing pond. Letter from Mattingley Parish - PM: Hart and RSPB are awaiting a signed letter of consent for the PINS application from Mattingley Parish Council. This has been completed via LW and MC. Natural England surveys - Action is outstanding for Matt Taylor (Natural England) to find out when the field units are due at Hazeley. ACTION: PM Bramshill crossing - PM: No change from 09/05/2017 meeting. ACTION: LW/PM Himalayan Balsam – PM: No enforcement available for neighbouring land on Hazeley streams and rivers. Hart can manage what they are responsible for. There is scope for an initiative such as volunteering to aid in the removal of Himalayan Balsam. Fencing Application – PM: HART and the RSPB have met and chose the same specification and structures. Naming of Features – JC: The features still require naming such as the scrapes. This is to be carried out during winter when there is less work on. HART and the RSPB to aid in choosing these alongside the management plan. Are these to be short coded names or site relevant names? ACTION: PM/ JC Surveys 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest
    The Dragonflies of Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest Freshwater Habitats Trust Author Ken Crick Forward Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is a Flagship Pond Site. Part of a network of the very best of Britain’s ponds; sites of exceptional importance for freshwater wildlife and some of our finest freshwater habitats. The Flagship sites can be a single special pond, or more commonly group of ponds, selected because they support rich, often irreplaceable, communities and species at risk of extinction. They represent some of the least impacted, most diverse pond habitats remaining in the country. Many of our nation’s most beautiful and biodiverse waterbodies have degraded irrevocably, and it’s critically important that the remaining sites are well protected and well managed. In 2015, with funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund, Freshwater Habitats Trust launched the Flagship Ponds project, Mats of Water Crowfoot flower on Bramshill working with land managers and community groups to ensure that the most Plantation’s Longwater. critical pond sites in Britain were protected for the long term. This book has been published with the aim of enabling people visiting this, Introduction immensely important Flagship Pond Site in Northern Hampshire, to identify the dragonflies and damselflies they encounter - by reference to a simple text This nationally important Site of managed by Forestry Commission and in places subsequent backfilling Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) England (FCE), please see the site with landfill, Bramshill SSSI has and photographs. It should also inform those visiting the site of the location is notified as such in part for its map on page 6 which depicts the through a combination of careful of the majority of freshwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Parish Council Meeting
    HECKFIELD PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES OF PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday 7th August 2019, 7.30pm, Heckfield Memorial Hall PRESENT: Parish Councillors – Simon Richards (Chairman), Brian Baker, David Hunt, Ian Bowman (newly Co-opted Parish Councillor); Guest – County Cllr David Simpson. 19.27 WELCOME & APOLOGIES Apologies Paul Burton, Stephen Harnett Ward Cllr Anne Crampton, PCSO Nick Greenwood. 19.28 CONFIRMATION OF NEW COUNCILLOR CO-OPTION Co-option of Ian Bowman as Parish Councillor as agreed at May AGM. Declaration of Office signed and witnessed. 19.29 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING of AGM 9th May 2019 agreed and signed. 19.30 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST in items on the Agenda – None. 19.31 PLANNING Applications considered since last meeting 19/01594/HOU (Validated 22 July) Danmoor House, Reading Road, Heckfield RG27 0JY. Erection of a single storey extension to the existing annexe following part demolition of the existing annexe. Converting existing kitchen to bedroom, additional bedroom and en-suite, relocation kitchen and dining and adding windows to north east elevation. Parish Council response: No objection. 19/01566/LDC (Validated 11 July) Whitewater Stables, Bramshill Road, Heckfield RG27 0LA Use of a building as a dwelling house. Parish Council response: Due to length of time the building has been used as a dwelling the Parish Council is content to defer to the judgement of the case officer. 19/01559/HOU and 19/01560/LBC (Validated 09 July) 27 Church Lane, Heckfield. Insertion of metal flue to roof slope. Parish Council response: No objection. 19/01150/HOU (Validated 24 June) Hamilton House, Reading Road, Heckfield RG27 0JY.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes2016october File Uploaded
    Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting for Mattingley Parish Council 17 October 2016 Heckfield Hall, Heckfield 7.30pm. Present: Cllr Hughes (JH) (Chairman) Cllr David Sexton (DS) Cllr Alan Woolford (AW) Cllr Keith Alderman (KA) Cllr Bob Aylmer (BA) Cllr Adam Knight (AK) Mr Ron Darley (RD) Parish Clerk 1 member of the public Meeting chaired by Cllr Janice Hughes REF AGENDA ITEM ACTION 16/132 Public Open Session 10 minutes allowed for any issue or query to be raised by the public 16/133 Receive Police Report: No police representative was present, and no report was received. 16/134 Apologies: were received from Cllr Alderman, County Cllr Simpson. 16/135 Declaration of interest in items on the Agenda Declaration by members of any personal prejudicial, pecuniary interests or non- personal interest in any Agenda item 16/136 Confirm the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 17 September - the minutes were confirmed and approved. Proposed DS, Seconded AW, Signed JH. 16/137 Council to discuss progress regarding the recruitment of a new Parish Clerk: approaches are being made to potential local candidates. The Clerk undertook to circulate draft vacancy advertisements for comment, to determine the preferred RD layout should advertisements be necessary. 16/138 Council to consider installation of playground equipment (swings etc) on Hound Green: doubt was expressed as to the need for such equipment. It was agreed to review this next year. Action required: (i) establish the need (number of RD children in the parish) (ii) contact HDC (Paul Green). 16/139 Council to discuss arrangements for the annual Remembrance Service: Service to be held on 13 November – time to be (JH).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting
    Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting Monday 20th March 7.30pm Heckfield Memorial Hall Present: Cllr Janice Hughes (JH) (Chairman); Cllr Bob Aylmer (BA); Cllr David Sexton (DS); Cllr Alan Woolford (AW). Clerk Susan Turner (ST) Guests: District Councillor Anne Crampton. Members of the public: 1 17.35 PubliC OPen SeSSiOn i A Hound Green resident expressed appreciation for the new benches etc on the Green and particularly the footbridge to Vicarage Lane. It was noted that Cllr Anne Crampton had been instrumental in approving the allocation of S106 funding. A separate dog waste bin was suggested for Hound Green, the current multi- purpose bin being close to the picnic table. ii A Vicarage lane resident emailed questions and concerns as unable to attend the meeting. ‘1. The speed of vehicles and lack of care in country lanes especially driving over banks and verges. Could Highways be persuaded to put in more passing spaces in Bottle and Vicarage Lanes?’ Parish Council comment: With cuts in Highways funding this is unlikely to be a priority. This is a question to refer to our County Councillor. ‘2. Asking for volunteers to clear litter from our area. Not much can be done about the rubbish thrown from cars and vans.’ Parish Council would encourage everyone to help tidy up litter from their local area. ‘3. The standard of hedge cutting by councils and their sensitivity to the environment.’ The local landowner is responsible for hedgcutting and is thought to be sensitive to the environment. ‘4. When the B3349 is closed, suggest a one way system in Bottle/Vicarage Lanes.’ Measures for the road closure will be discussed with SE Water and Highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Podolak Multifunctional Riverscapes
    Multifunctional Riverscapes: Stream restoration, Capability Brown’s water features, and artificial whitewater By Kristen Nicole Podolak A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Louise Mozingo Professor Vincent H. Resh Spring 2012 i Abstract Multifunctional Riverscapes by Kristen Nicole Podolak Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Society is investing in river restoration and urban river revitalization as a solution for sustainable development. Many of these river projects adopt a multifunctional planning and design approach that strives to meld ecological, aesthetic, and recreational functions. However our understanding of how to accomplish multifunctionality and how the different functions work together is incomplete. Numerous ecologically justified river restoration projects may actually be driven by aesthetic and recreational preferences that are largely unexamined. At the same time river projects originally designed for aesthetics or recreation are now attempting to integrate habitat and environmental considerations to make the rivers more sustainable. Through in-depth study of a variety of constructed river landscapes - including dense historical river bend designs, artificial whitewater, and urban stream restoration this dissertation analyzes how aesthetic, ecological, and recreational functions intersect and potentially conflict. To explore how aesthetic and biophysical processes work together in riverscapes, I explored the relationship between one ideal of beauty, an s-curve illustrated by William Hogarth in the 18th century and two sets of river designs: 18th century river designs in England and late 20th century river restoration designs in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Upper River Loddon Issues
    Upper Loddon Pressure Issue Location Solution Look at the river valley as a whole, reconnect the floodplain and create/enhance adjacent habitatas fen/wetland etc. Benefits for Biodiversity 2020 targets and flood alleviation d/s. BDBC GI want to work with the EA/catchment host Invasive species Basingstoke Town centre Raise awareness of the problems with the river through the town, would be nice to get water voles and kingfishers back. Coordinate mink control, no gaps – possible role for the host group Basingstoke is a NVZ Pollution incidents Sewage pipes not good enough Beech Hill Point source pollution Pollution from sewage treatment works, Sherfield on Loddon, u/s Pump somewhere else, Kennet? Basingstke, Sherborn St John and Sherfield, contributing to algae and disclorouration. Point source pollutiom Oestrogen from STW Use ferric oxide to remove phosphate, but at max level. But no limits on phosphate limits companies can put into river. Abstraction Over abstraction – low levels Reduce abstraction Sustainable water supply – reservoir, will also provide biodiversity benefits. Maintain flows throughout the river Habitat quality Priory Mill stream is dry most summers Priory Mill Habitat quality Morphology No dredging Flooding Flooding Flooding Perched River Just above Longbridge Mill Reconnect to floodplain Flooding u/s Swallowfield Restore floodplain Habitat quality Trees have reached the end of their Upper Loddon natural life; no longer get help from the EA to maintain. Habitat quality Aesthetic restoration at Festival Place Habitat quality Basing Fen Habitat restoration Habitat quality Walkway from Basingstoke to Barton is overused. Bikes and dogs are a problem. Habitat quality Bow Brook Habitat improvements, bank rehabilitation and gravels.
    [Show full text]
  • GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Nationalgrideso UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019
    GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019 Today’s High Level Risk Status Forecast for the next 24h Time General Status Voltage PSM Demand System Inertia 07:00 - 14:00 System Margins Weather Duty 14:00 - 21:00 Generation Transmission Officer 21:00 - 07:00 Active Constraints Today’s Minimum De-Rated Margin 3891.13 (SP 36) System Warnings None Generation Variable Current BMU Largest Loss Risk Demand 560MW Balancing Costs Last 241 hours'6 ENCC11 BM16 spend212631Total:36 £729k414651566166717681869196 £80k £60k £40k £20k £0k -£20k -£40k Yesterday’s Market Summary Cash out price (Max) £80.00 /MWh (SP 20) Cash Out Price (Min) £23.01 /MWh (SP 15) Peak Demand Yesterday 28,745 MW NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 2 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Interconnectors Today Import Export Netherlands (BritNed) 1060 1060 Fully Available France (IFA) 1500 1500 Pole 1 unavailable, due to RTS at 12:00hrs Belgium (Nemo) 1013 1013 Fullly Available Ireland (EWIC) 500 530 Fullly Available Northern Ireland (MOYLE) 395 500 Partially available. Wind Power Forecast Key: Expected embedded generation (MWs) Embedded Generation Forecast 10-JUN-2019 11-JUN-2019 12-JUN-2019 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 Solar (MW) 1 1640 3830 1700 46 0 0 1039 3564 2060 29 0 0 725 2193 1717 38 Wind (MW) 284 381 689 1203 1281 1361 1783 2073 2250 2137 1798 1760 1712 1706 1773 1751 1600 STOR (MW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total (MW) 285 2021 4519 2903 1327 1361 1783 3112 5814 4197 1827 1760 1712 2431 3966 3468 1638 NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 3 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Weather Source Commentary 11/05/2019 Met Office Today: (Summary) SEPA Rain, heavy at times, and strong winds will continue across much of Natural Resources Wales England and Wales, although south and southeastern parts will be brighter with lighter winds but with heavy, thundery showers developing.
    [Show full text]
  • Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
    Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]