DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter 2014 Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DAVIS BOTANICAL SOCIETY LASTHENIA LASTHENIA, the Newsletter of the Davis Botanical Society, is published in collaboration with the staff of the UC Davis Botanical Conservatory UPCOMING EVENTS and Center for Plant Diversity. Editor: Kate Mawdsley Issue Contributors: E. Dean, S. Rae, E. Grissell, K. Mawdsley, D. Potter, M. Arboretum/Conservatory Plant Sales: Saturdays, April 5, Rejmanek, M. Gonzales, K. Battenberg, April 26, May 17. All sales 9 am to 1 pm. M. Starbuck, J. Perez Z., D. McQuaid Design: Susan Gloystein Picnic Day exhibits at Botanical Conservatory and Center for Layout: Ellen Dean Plant Diversity: Saturday, April 12, 11 am to 3 pm. DBS OFFICERS, 2013-2014 President: Marie Jasieniuk Davis Botanical Society Annual Meeting with elections and President-elect: Brenda Grewell Spring Speaker: Thursday, May 8, 6:45 - 8 pm, Davis Public Membership Vice President: Patrick McGuire & Kate Mawdsley Library Blanchard Room. Russell Huddleston speaking on Secretary: Marlene Simon Vegetation and Restoration in Saudi Arabia. Treasurer: Robert Rhode Past President: Joe DiTomaso Note: Field trip to The Cedars on May 17 is FULL. Members at Large: Susan Harrison, Valerie Layne Student Member at Large: Jorge Perez Zabala Ex officio: Dan Potter, Ernesto Sandoval, Ellen Dean UC Davis Mail ID: BTNY BTNY ID: Mail Davis UC Davis, CA 95616 95616 CA Davis, University of California California of University One Shields Avenue Avenue Shields One Plant Sciences Mail Stop #7 Stop Mail Sciences Plant Center for Plant Diversity Diversity Plant for Center 8 No. 41 Winter 2014 LASTHENIA NEWSLETTER OF THE DAVIS BOTANICAL SOCIETY DECIPHERING THE ROSE FAMILY With the thought that DBS members may have ended up at numerous universities be interested in how plant systematics/ around the world, as well as botanical taxonomy students are using the gardens and private companies. herbarium these days, we interviewed Over the past 17 years, dozens Dr. Dan Potter, Director of the Center for of students, postdocs, and other Plant Diversity (herbarium) and Professor collaborators have made their home of Plant Sciences, about his research and in the Potter lab, mainly focusing on the work of his graduate students. the phylogeny and classification of Research in the Potter lab the rose family (Rosaceae), although addresses the diversity, evolution, and others have had independent projects taxonomy of flowering plants, with on ethnobotany (the uses of plants a strong emphasis on cultivated and by people) or other plant families or domesticated species and their wild genera in diverse regions of the world. relatives. Many of Dan’s students have Significant outcomes have included the received grants from the Davis Botanical following: Cinquefoil (Drymocallis) in the Rosaceae. Society, which have been tremendously 1. A multi-authored international Photo: Margaret Starbuck helpful in supporting their field, collaboration that produced a new classification of Rosaceae, grouping herbarium, and lab work. Graduates phylogeny-based infra-familial genera into three subfamilies and ten tribes; 2. Research findings by Brian Vanden Heuvel that surprisingly low levels NEW PLANT TAXONOMY STUDENT of genetic diversity are present in the SCHOLARSHIP ESTABLISHED nitrogen-fixing bacteria that cause root nodulation of Rosaceae species We are happy to announce that the in subfamily Dryadoideae, including Department of Plant Sciences has been the genera Cercocarpus (mountain- the recipient of a donation that creates a mahogany), Chamaebatia (mountain new endowment, The Law Family Award. misery), Dryas (mountain-avens), and The interest from this endowment will Purshia (bitter-brush); be used to provide scholarships to plant continued on page 4 science students at any level in their academic career who have a relationship with the Center for Plant Diversity her- barium and an interest in plant taxonomy. IN THIS ISSUE The endowment was created with a $25,000 donation made by E. Eric Gris- Deciphering the Rosaceae ................1 sell and matched one-to-one by other UC Eric Grissell. New Student Scholarship ................1 Davis donors for a total of $50,000. At the same time, a second endowment has Conservatory ...................................2 been set up that will benefit the Bohart Museum of Entomology. Eric has been Remembering Jim Neilson ...............5 a staunch supporter of the Davis Botanical Society student grants fund. Some of Lichen Workshop ............................6 continued on page 3 Chinese Pistache ..............................7 1 THE CONSERVATORY - A STUDENT’S VIEW Marisol Gonzalez is a fifth-year Wildlife employees had completed an internship and Fish Biology major with minors in with the conservatory, but Ernesto took Landscape Restoration and Native Ameri- a chance on me and my odyssey began. can Studies; she has worked at the UC My very first day at work, on a Mon- Davis Botanical Conservatory for four day in August, I was asked to sweep the years. So she was a well-qualified choice hallway of 61 (the main greenhouse that when we looked for someone to provide makes up the majority of the conserva- the student viewpoint on the work of the tory collection), and I also cleaned the conservatory. Marisol is also a wonder- benches. I remember being in awe of all ful artist (botanical and otherwise), and the plant diversity present in this rela- she painted the artwork included in our tively small space. I learned firsthand Museum Day poster and fliers. that the Ortiga Brava plant’s hypodermic During my first year at UC Da- needles caused an unpleasant stinging vis, my work with plants began with sensation on the hand. I also remember a spring internship at the UC Davis that I was only supposed to work morn- Arboretum. My only previous plant ings, but I was very eager to work, and experience was pulling weeds in the Ernesto allowed me to work full-day summertime at my local national park, shifts. and I wanted to learn how to nurture On my first afternoon, I worked and grow plants, not just how to kill on removing a weed known colloqui- Echinops. unwanted ones. I learned a lot about ally in the greenhouse as pop weed. I Painting and Photo: Marisol Gonzalez propagation, making cuttings, pruning, have since found the plant’s scientific mulching, irrigation, etc. in the Storer name, but it is not as memorable. The about and participated in teamwork garden area of the Arboretum. rest of the week was different, because aimed at the larger goal of taking care of The following summer I found that there were summer interns present and the plants in the collection. I was eligible for a work-study job on Ernesto had me tag along on some of Yet another valuable aspect of being campus and saw a listing for work in the intern activities and field trips. In a student employee at the conservatory a greenhouse. I had no idea that the doing so, I learned more plant vocabu- throughout my undergraduate career is greenhouse in question was the Botani- lary, specifically words descriptive of the fact that Ernesto and Marlene can cal Conservatory. I had never even been plant vegetative parts. I also had the both speak to my work ethic truthfully inside. I met with Ernesto Sandoval opportunity to visit such places as the when the time comes to apply for jobs and Marlene Simon, the director and germplasm repository, a part of campus when I finish school. They can honestly nursery technician, respectively, after involved with keeping all sorts of plants say that I am very persistent when it my last spring final. I didn’t know the alive, and Foundation Plant Services, comes to removing unwanted plants vast majority of greenhouse student where they test for plant pathogens. The through numerous generations and that field trips were a lot of fun, and I would I should probably take it easy on the not have visited such places otherwise. pruning. In my years helping take care of the Furthermore, Ernesto personally has greenhouse, I continued to sweep and helped me grow as an artist by asking weed and expanded my repertoire of me to paint portraits of greenhouse flow- greenhouse activities to include washing ers. Ernesto himself is a photographer, pots, scrubbing floors, transplanting and I have made some paintings based plants too big for their pots, more prun- on those flowers, and in that process, I ing and also daily watering following a have learned to appreciate the color and watering schedule. These activities are structure of plants. At least one of my valuable, because through them I have paintings is at the Plant Biology office on learned that there is a lot of behind-the- campus, and many are at the Botanical scenes hard work involved in taking Conservatory office. Even Tim Metcalf, care of a large collection of living plants. the previous director, owns one of my I have also learned that it would botanical paintings. not be possible to do this work without There have been numerous times a larger community of student interns when a visitor tells me that they would and other student employees. The guid- love to have my job, and I smile and say ance provided by Marlene and Ernesto “thanks!” And I think to myself: I am is invaluable. So, while I now perform very fortunate to be here. many of these activities unsupervised M. Gonzalez Biodiversity Museum Day. (which has helped foster responsibility Painting and Photo: Marisol Gonzalez and accountability), I have also learned 2 RECENT GIFTS Herbarium Endowment Conservatory Operations Beth Corbin Robert Earl Louise Jackson & Patrick McGuire Jean Gifford Sue Nichol Reynotta Hoberecht Mandy Tu & Philip Rogers Joseph Lin Frederick Ryan Carol Ludlum San Francisco Cactus and Succulent Herbarium Operations Society California Native Plant Society Dennis Walker Lewis Feldman Louis & Georgette Grivetti Davis Botanical Society Stephen & Jill Rae Conservatory Endowment Student Grants Fund Judy Jernstedt Gerald Dickinson Herbarium Gifts in Kind Dennis Walker Javier Jauregui Lazo Ellen Dean Gerald Dickinson The Law Family Endowment Daniel Potter E.
Recommended publications
  • Permanent Draft Genome Sequence of Frankia Sp. NRRL B-16219 Reveals

    Permanent Draft Genome Sequence of Frankia Sp. NRRL B-16219 Reveals

    Ktari et al. Standards in Genomic Sciences (2017) 12:51 DOI 10.1186/s40793-017-0261-3 EXTENDEDGENOMEREPORT Open Access Permanent draft genome sequence of Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 reveals the presence of canonical nod genes, which are highly homologous to those detected in Candidatus Frankia Dg1 genome Amir Ktari1, Imen Nouioui1, Teal Furnholm2, Erik Swanson2, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari1, Louis S. Tisa2 and Maher Gtari1* Abstract Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 was directly isolated from a soil sample obtained from the rhizosphere of Ceanothus jepsonii growing in the USA. Its host plant range includes members of Elaeagnaceae species. Phylogenetically, strain NRRL B-16219 is closely related to “Frankia discariae” with a 16S rRNA gene similarity of 99.78%. Because of the lack of genetic tools for Frankia, our understanding of the bacterial signals involved during the plant infection process and the development of actinorhizal root nodules is very limited. Since the first three Frankia genomes were sequenced, additional genome sequences covering more diverse strains have helped provide insight into the depth of the pangenome and attempts to identify bacterial signaling molecules like the rhizobial canonical nod genes. The genome sequence of Frankia sp. strain NRRL B-16219 was generated and assembled into 289 contigs containing 8,032,739 bp with 71.7% GC content. Annotation of the genome identified 6211 protein-coding genes, 561 pseudogenes, 1758 hypothetical proteins and 53 RNA genes including 4 rRNA genes. The NRRL B-16219 draft genome contained genes homologous to the rhizobial common nodulation genes clustered in two areas. The first cluster contains nodACIJH genes whereas the second has nodAB and nodH genes in the upstream region.
  • Production, Pomological and Nutraceutical Properties of Apricot

    Production, Pomological and Nutraceutical Properties of Apricot

    1 Production, pomological and nutraceutical properties of apricot Khaled Moustafa1* and Joanna Cross2 1Editor of ArabiXiv (arabixiv.org), Paris, France 2Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Apricot (Prunus sp.) is an important fruit crop worldwide. Despite recent advances in apricot research, much is still to be done to improve its productivity and environmental adaptability. The availability of wild apricot germplasms with economically interesting traits is a strong incentive to increase research panels toward improving its economic, environmental and nutritional characteristics. New technologies and genomic studies have generated a large amount of raw data that the mining and exploitation can help decrypt the biology of apricot and enhance its agronomic values. Here, we outline recent findings in relation to apricot production, pomological and nutraceutical properties. In particular, we retrace its origin from central Asia and the path it took to attain Europe and other production areas around the Mediterranean basin while locating it in the rosaceae family and referring to its genetic diversities and new attempts of classification. The production, nutritional, and nutraceutical importance of apricot are recapped in an easy readable and comparable way. We also highlight and discuss the effects of late frost damages on apricot production over different growth stages, from swollen buds to green fruits formation. Issues related to the length of production season and biotic and abiotic environmental challenges are also discussed with future perspective on how to lengthen the production season without compromising the fruit quality and productivity. Keywords Apricot kernel oil, plum pox virus, prunus armeniaca, spring frost, stone fruit, sharka.
  • F.3 References for Appendix F

    F.3 References for Appendix F

    F-1 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F-2 F-3 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F.1 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE ECOREGIONS Ecoregions delineate areas that have a general similarity in their ecosystems and in the types, qualities, and quantities of their environmental resources. They are based on unique combinations of geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology (EPA 2004). Ecoregions are defined as areas having relative homogeneity in their ecological systems and their components. Factors associated with spatial differences in the quality and quantity of ecosystem components (including soils, vegetation, climate, geology, and physiography) are relatively homogeneous within an ecoregion. A number of individuals and organizations have characterized North America on the basis of ecoregions (e.g., Omernik 1987; CEC 1997; Bailey 1997). The intent of such ecoregion classifications has been to provide a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. The ecoregion discussions presented in this programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) follow the Level III ecoregion classification based on Omernik (1987) and refined through collaborations among U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional offices, state resource management agencies, and other federal agencies (EPA 2004). The following sections provide brief descriptions of each of the Level III ecoregions that have been identified for the 11 western states in which potential wind energy development may occur on BLM-administered lands.
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription

    Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription

    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
  • Arizona Cliffrose (Purshia Subintegra) on the Coconino National Forest Debra L

    Arizona Cliffrose (Purshia Subintegra) on the Coconino National Forest Debra L

    Arizona cliffrose (Purshia subintegra) on the Coconino National Forest Debra L. Crisp Coconino National Forest and Barbara G. Phillips, PhD. Coconino, Kaibab and Prescott National Forests Introduction – Arizona cliffrose Associated species Threats Management actions Major range-wide threats to Arizona Cliffrose There are numerous other plant include urbanization, recreation, road and benefiting Arizona cliffrose •A long lived endemic shrub known only from four disjunct populations in species associated with Arizona utility line construction and maintenance, central Arizona, near Cottonwood, Bylas, Horseshoe Lake and Burro cliffrose. These include four Region 3 •Establishment of the Verde Valley Botanical Area minerals exploration and mining, and Creek. Sensitive species: heathleaf wild in 1987 (Coconino National Forest) livestock and wildlife browsing. •Usually less than 2 m tall with pale yellow flowers and entire leaves that buckwheat (Eriogonum ericifolium va r. •Withdrawal of an important part of the ericifolium), Ripley wild buckwheat population from a proposed land exchange lack glands. The Cottonwood population is in a (Eriogonum ripleyi), Verde Valley sage (Coconino National Forest) developing urban/suburban area. The •Occurs only on white Tertiary limestone lakebed deposits of the Verde (Salvia dorrii va r. mearnsii) and Rusby Rusby milkwort population in the Cottonwood area is rapidly •No lands containing Endangered species will be Formation that are high in lithium, nitrates, and magnesium. milkwort (Polygala rusbyi). increasing and human impacts are evident in exchanged from federal ownership (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995) •Listed as Endangered in 1984. A Recovery Plan was prepared in 1995. the habitat of Arizona cliffrose. Many areas that were “open land” when photographs •Closure of the Botanical Area and surrounding were taken in 1987 are now occupied.
  • Cercocarpus Montanus Cercocarpus Montanus ‘USU-CEMO-001’ ‘USU-CEMO- Was Collected As a Suspected Dwarf Plant in TM Moffat County, CO, on 20 June 2014

    Cercocarpus Montanus Cercocarpus Montanus ‘USU-CEMO-001’ ‘USU-CEMO- Was Collected As a Suspected Dwarf Plant in TM Moffat County, CO, on 20 June 2014

    HORTSCIENCE 55(11):1871–1875. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15343-20 Origin Cercocarpus montanus Cercocarpus montanus ‘USU-CEMO-001’ ‘USU-CEMO- was collected as a suspected dwarf plant in TM Moffat County, CO, on 20 June 2014. This 001’: A New Sego Supreme Plant unique, procumbent specimen was discovered laying over a rock on a windy ridge at an Asmita Paudel, Youping Sun, and Larry A. Rupp elevation of 2708 m (Fig. 2A). The appearance Center for Water Efficient Landscaping, Department of Plants, Soils, and looked different from the typical C. montanus Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 nearby (Fig. 2B). The leaves are smaller and narrower with less serrations compared with Richard Anderson the typical plants (Fig. 2C). Healthy cuttings USU Botanical Center, 725 Sego Lily Drive, Kaysville, UT 84037 were collected, wrapped in moist newspapers and placed on ice until transferred to a cooler at Additional index words. alder-leaf mountain mahogany, cutting propagation, landscape plant, 4 °C. On 21 June, the terminal cuttings were native plant, true mountain mahogany rinsed in 1% ZeroTol (27.1% hydrogen diox- ide, 2.0% peroxyacetic acid, 70.9% inert in- gredient; BioSafe Systems, Hartford, CT), Sego SupremeTM is a plant introduction mose style with elongated achenes wounded by scraping 1 cm of bark from the program developed by the Utah State Uni- (Fig. 1B) (Shaw et al., 2004). It possesses base of the cutting on one side, treated with versity (USU) Botanical Center (Anderson an extensive root system and adapts to 2000 mg·L–1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)/1000 et al., 2014) to introduce native and adaptable medium to coarse textured soil.
  • Spring 2019 Volume 42 Number 2 Natureserve Global Ranking

    Spring 2019 Volume 42 Number 2 Natureserve Global Ranking

    Spring 2019 Volume 42 Number 2 NatureServe Global Ranking Session at March 2019 UNPS Meeting NatureServe Global Ranking .... 2 Cliffrose Reminder ..................... 19 Utah Rare Plant Meeting 2019 . 4 Dorde Woodruff .......................... 20 Fritillaria pudica ......................... 12 Joel Tuhy Meeting ............................. 21 Eriogonum Society Meeting .... 15 Lifetime Members ....................... 21 Alma Winward ............................. 16 Penstemon Society Meeting .... 22 Bill Gray’s App Reviews ............ 19 Dave Wallace Weed Pull ........... 22 BYU Herbarium sheet image adapted to fit page. Original image available on SEINet http://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/index.php Utah Native Plant Society NatureServe Global Ranking Session at March 2019 UNPS Meeting by Anne Frances ([email protected]) and About Conservation Status Assessments, or Ranks Leah Oliver ([email protected]) Conservation status assessments are used to prioritize plant conservation efforts by evaluating a species’ risk of extinction (Master, 1991). Because of the recognized Abstract importance of status assessments to conservation, On March 4, 2019 the Utah Native Plant Society and several international policy initiatives and strategies NatureServe co-coordinated a Global Ranking session to include status assessments as part of their strategic review the conservation status of high priority plant species. goals. For example, Target 2 of the Convention on Global Ranks refer to NatureServe’s Conservation Status Biological Diversity’s Global Strategy for Plant Assessments, the most widely used platform for assessing Conservation calls for “an assessment of the conservation status of species in the United States and conservation status of all known plant species…to guide Canada. The meeting was hosted by Red Butte Botanic conservation action” by 2020 (CBD, 2012). Similarly, the Gardens in Salt Lake City.
  • They Come in Teams

    They Come in Teams

    GBE Frankia-Enriched Metagenomes from the Earliest Diverging Symbiotic Frankia Cluster: They Come in Teams Thanh Van Nguyen1, Daniel Wibberg2, Theoden Vigil-Stenman1,FedeBerckx1, Kai Battenberg3, Kirill N. Demchenko4,5, Jochen Blom6, Maria P. Fernandez7, Takashi Yamanaka8, Alison M. Berry3, Jo¨ rn Kalinowski2, Andreas Brachmann9, and Katharina Pawlowski 1,* 1Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden 2Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Germany 3Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis 4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Development, Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia 5Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Saint Petersburg, Russia 6Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany 7Ecologie Microbienne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 5557, Universite Lyon I, Villeurbanne Cedex, France 8Forest and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan 9Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: July 10, 2019 Data deposition: This project has been deposited at EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ under the accession PRJEB19438 - PRJEB19449. Abstract Frankia strains induce the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules on roots of actinorhizal plants. Phylogenetically, Frankia strains can be grouped in four clusters. The earliest divergent cluster, cluster-2, has a particularly wide host range. The analysis of cluster-2 strains has been hampered by the fact that with two exceptions, they could never be cultured. In this study, 12 Frankia-enriched meta- genomes of Frankia cluster-2 strains or strain assemblages were sequenced based on seven inoculum sources. Sequences obtained via DNA isolated from whole nodules were compared with those of DNA isolated from fractionated preparations enhanced in the Frankia symbiotic structures.
  • Reference Plant List

    Reference Plant List

    APPENDIX J NATIVE & INVASIVE PLANT LIST The following tables capture the referenced plants, native and invasive species, found throughout this document. The Wildlife Action Plan Team elected to only use common names for plants to improve the readability, particular for the general reader. However, common names can create confusion for a variety of reasons. Common names can change from region-to-region; one common name can refer to more than one species; and common names have a way of changing over time. For example, there are two widespread species of greasewood in Nevada, and numerous species of sagebrush. In everyday conversation generic common names usually work well. But if you are considering management activities, landscape restoration or the habitat needs of a particular wildlife species, the need to differentiate between plant species and even subspecies suddenly takes on critical importance. This appendix provides the reader with a cross reference between the common plant names used in this document’s text, and the scientific names that link common names to the precise species to which writers referenced. With regards to invasive plants, all species listed under the Nevada Revised Statute 555 (NRS 555) as a “Noxious Weed” will be notated, within the larger table, as such. A noxious weed is a plant that has been designated by the state as a “species of plant which is, or is likely to be, detrimental or destructive and difficult to control or eradicate” (NRS 555.05). To assist the reader, we also included a separate table detailing the noxious weeds, category level (A, B, or C), and the typical habitats that these species invade.
  • Curl-Leaf Mountain Mahogany in the Landscape

    Curl-Leaf Mountain Mahogany in the Landscape

    January 2009 HG/Native Plants/2009-03 Curl-leaf Mountain Mahogany in the Landscape Heidi Kratsch, Extension Ornamental Horticulture Specialist Graham Hunter, Research Associate, Center for Water Efficient Landscaping Cercocarpus ledifolius Curl-leaf mountain mahogany Description: Curl-leaf mountain mahogany is a marvelous large shrub to small tree that would look good in any ornamental landscape, but is especially adapted for low-water landscapes. It is the only broadleaf evergreen tree in the Intermountain West, and as such it offers an interesting winter contrast to the standard landscape conifer. It achieves a rather gnarly and quite intriguing shape with age. Seeds have long, cork-screw, feather-like plumes that cover the tree, creating an almost fuzzy appearance from a distance. The leaves are distinctively aromatic, evergreen and, curled under, thus its common name. Cultural Requirements: • Native habitat Dry hills and rocky slopes throughout the West at elevations from 5,000 to 10,000 feet • Soil Well drained, tolerates poor soil conditions; prefers coarse, rocky slopes; pH 6.0 to 9.0 • Cold Tolerance Zones 3-8 • Drought Tolerance High • Salt Tolerance Unknown • Sun/Shade Preference Full sun to part shade • Transplanting Deep tap root makes it difficult to transplant • Propagation Seed or hardwood stem cuttings • Maintenance Prune in winter; tolerates hedging or shearing • Problems Browsed by deer Landscape Value: • Use in the Landscape Use as a screen or for reclamation, soil stabilization, cover for wildlife; becomes multi-stemmed
  • Curl-Leaf Cercocarpus Or Curl-Leaf Mountain-Mahogany

    Curl-Leaf Cercocarpus Or Curl-Leaf Mountain-Mahogany

    Curl-leaf Cercocarpus or Curl-leaf Mountain-mahogany A shrub or small tree of northwestern and west-central Colorado, usually 3 to 25 feet (1 to 8 m) tall. It grows in the pinon-juniper woodlands, and on mountain slopes among Ponderosa pine, Douglas-Fir, Lodgepole pine, and the spruce-fir forests at 6500 – 9000 feet (2000 – 2750 m) elevation). The trunk and branches are often crooked. The curled leaf edges and silky curled tails on the fruit are distinctive. The leaves are evergreen. Deer browse on the leaves and shelter in thickets of mountain-mahogany. The curly tails on the seeds straighten out in dry weather, and curl again in moist conditions. This flexing helps drive loose seeds into the soil. The scientific name Cercocarpus ledifolius comes from the Greek cerkos carpos, “tail fruit.” A common name is mountain-mahogany, though this plant is not related to the tropical mahogany tree; the name is due to the dark wood. The dark heartwood is said to be so heavy that it sinks. Identification: evergreen leaves: ½ to 1 inches (1 to 3 cm) long; 1/3 to 2/3 (5 to 10 mm) inches wide, dark green, shiny, and leathery. The untoothed edges curl under, but the leaf undersides are mostly exposed. Stems: and twigs reddish. Bark: hard, flaky, up to one inch (2 cm) thick. Fruit: feathery, silver-colored, tails are 2 to 3 inches (2.5 to 7.5 cm) long. Text Copyright © 1995 - 2010 S. K. Wier. Reproduction reuse or retransmission prohibited without prior written permission from the author.
  • Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem

    Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem

    Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem JOACHIM W. KADEREIT1*, DIRK C. ALBACH2, FRIEDRICH EHRENDORFER3, MERCÈ GALBANY-CASALS4, NÚRIA GARCIA-JACAS5, BERIT GEHRKE1, GUDRUN KADEREIT6,1, NORBERT KILIAN7, JOHANNES T. KLEIN1, MARCUS A. KOCH8, MATTHIAS KROPF9, CHRISTOPH OBERPRIELER10, MICHAEL D. PIRIE1,11, CHRISTIANE M. RITZ12, MARTIN RÖSER13, KRZYSZTOF SPALIK14, ALFONSO SUSANNA5, MAXIMILIAN WEIGEND15, ERIK WELK16, KARSTEN WESCHE12,17, LI-BING ZHANG18 & MARKUS S. DILLENBERGER1 Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? Version of record irst published online on 24 March 2016 ahead of inclusion in April 2016 issue. Abstract: The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating well- founded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classiications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in ge- neric assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identiied c. 140 where data quality is suiciently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet suicient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still iercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be trans- lated into a classiication, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German lora and the loras of neighbouring countries.