Downloaded from Brill.Com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM Via Free Access 54 IAWA Journal, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded from Brill.Com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM Via Free Access 54 IAWA Journal, Vol IAWA Journal, Vol. 31 (1), 2010: 53–66 TORUS-BEARING PIT MEMBRANES IN CERCOCARPUS Roland Dute1,*, Jaynesh Patel1 and Steven Jansen2,3 SUMMARY Intervascular pit membranes of Cercocarpus possess torus thickenings. The thickenings, or pads, consist of lignified, secondary wall material. Torus pad deposition occurs late in cell ontogeny and is not associated with a microtubule plexus. Half-bordered pit pairs between tracheary elements and parenchyma cells often have a torus pad on the membrane surface facing the conducting cell. In contrast, a thick protective layer fills the pit cavity on the side of the parenchyma cell. Ontogeny of the torus thickenings in Cercocarpus represents a third mode of torus de- velopment in eudicots when compared to that occurring in Osmanthus / Daphne and Ulmus /Celtis. Key words: Bordered pit, Cercocarpus, pit membrane, torus, tracheid, vessel element, xylem. INTRODUCTION At one time, intervascular pit membranes in eudicotyledon woods were thought to be exclusively homogeneous. Then, in 1978, Ohtani and Ishida observed torus-bearing pit membranes in three species of Osmanthus (Oleaceae) and in three species of Daphne (Thymelaeaceae). Further work in several laboratories since that time has increased the number of species with torus-bearing pit membranes to 78 distributed within ten genera and five families (Table 1 and literature cited therein). Our laboratory has been concerned with the ontogeny of such pit membranes. These developmental studies were summarized by Coleman et al. (2004). Basically, two mechanisms of torus manufacture were recognized. One method, as illustrated by Osmanthus americanus and Daphne odora, involved a late deposition of torus pads in association with microtubule clusters. The second method, as found in Celtis occidentalis and Ulmus alata, involved early thickening of the pit membrane without benefit of a microtubule plexus. A recent study described intervascular pit membrane structure in the Rosales with an emphasis on species in the Rosaceae (Jansen et al. 2007). Included in this study were all four species of the genus Cercocarpus (according to Kartesz 1999): C. intricatus S.Wats., C. ledifolius Nutt., C. montanus Raf., and C. traskiae Eastw. Cercocarpus betu- loides Torrey & Gray, as used in this study, is considered a synonym of C. montanus (Kartesz 1999). 1) Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Life Sciences Building, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5407, U. S. A. 2) Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, Richmond, Surrey, U. K. 3) Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. *) To whom correspondence should be addressed [E-mail: [email protected]]. Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM via free access 54 IAWA Journal, Vol. 31 (1), 2010 Table 1. Eudicot species containing torus-bearing pit membranes in their woods. Family Species Citation Oleaceae Chionanthus retusa Rabaey et al. 2008 Osmanthus americanus Dute & Rushing 1987 O. aurantiacus Ohtani 1983 O. fortunei Ohtani & Ishida 1978; Ohtani 1983 O. fragrans ” ” O. heterophyllus ” ” O. insularis Ohtani 1983 O. rigidus Ohtani 1983 O. serratulus Rabaey et al. 2006 O. suavis ” Picconia azorica Dute et al. 2008; Rabaey et al. 2008 P. excelsa ” ” Thymelaeaceae Daphne acutiloba Dute et al. 1992 D. alpina ” D. altaica ” D. arbuscula ” D. arisanensis Dute et al. 1996 D. aurantiaca ” D. bholua ” D. blagayana Dute et al. 1992 D. × burkwoodii ” D. caucasica ” D. cneorum Dute et al. 1990 D. collina Dute et al. 1992 D. ericoides Dute et al. 1996 D. genkwa Dute et al. 1992 D. glomerata ” D. gnidioides Dute et al. 1996 D. gnidium Dute et al. 1992 D. jasminea Dute et al. 1996 D. kiusiana Ohtani & Ishida 1978; Ohtani 1983 D. laureola Dute et al. 1992 D. miyabeana Ohtani & Ishida 1978; Ohtani 1983 D. odora ” ” D. oleoides Dute et al. 1992 D. papyracea ” D. petraea Dute et al. 1996 D. retusa Dute et al. 1992 D. stapfii Dute et al. 1996 D. striata Dute et al. 1992 D. tangutica ” Wikstroemia albiflora Dute et al. 1996 W. kudoi ” W. pauciflora ” W. yakushimensis ” ………………………………………………………………………………………………… Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM via free access Dute, Patel & Jansen — Torus-bearing pit membranes 55 (Table 1 continued) Family Species Citation Rosaceae Cercocarpus intricatus Jansen et al. 2007 C. ledifolius ” C. montanus ” C. traskiae ” Ulmaceae Planera aquatica Dute et al. 2004 Ulmus alata Wheeler 1983 U. americana Jansen et al. 2004 U. campestris Czaninski 1979 U. carpinifolia Jansen et al. 2004 U. coritana ” U. cornubiensis ” U. davidiana ” U. diversifolia ” U. effusa ” U. fulva ” U. glabra ” U. japonica ” U. laciniata ” U. macrocarpa ” U. montana ” U. parvifolia ” U. pedunculata ” U. plotii ” U. scabra ” U. thomasii Wheeler 1983 Zelkova acuminata Jansen et al. 2004 Z. crenata ” Z. cretica Jansen et al. 2007 Z. serrata ” Cannabaceae Celtis australis Jansen et al. 2007 C. laevigata Wheeler 1983 C. occidentalis ” C. reticulata ” Intervascular pit membranes of this genus appeared thickened under the light mi- croscope. These thickenings resolved themselves as tori when viewed with the electron microscope. This observation represented a new record for tori in angiosperms, and the first (and so far only) recorded instance of tori in the Rosaceae (Jansenet al. 2007). The aims of the present study were to investigate torus ontogeny in Cercocarpus, and to compare the developmental sequence with that of previously investigated species. Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM via free access 56 IAWA Journal, Vol. 31 (1), 2010 Table 2. Sources of Cercocarpus wood specimens examined in this study. Taxon Herbarium Date of Collection Collector(s) No. C. betuloides Torrey & A.Gray AUA 29 June 1966 Crampton 7776 C. betuloides Torrey & A.Gray AUA 17 June 2007 Boyd s.n. C. betuloides Torrey & A.Gray K unknown Clokey & Templeton 4596 C. intricatus Wats. DAV 14 May 1977 Levin 1248 C. ledifolius Nutt. K 12 June 2005 S. Jansen, accession number 1980-6418 C. montanus Raf. K unknown Baker et al. 392 C. montanus Raf. var. argentus (Rydb.) F.L. Martin AUA 17 Aug 1980 Drost 72 var. paucidentatus (S.Wats.) F. L. Martin K unknown Rehder 397 var. paucidentatus (S.Wats.) F.L. Martin K unknown Rehder 56 C. traskiae Eastw. AHUC 6 April 1982 Crampton s.n. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sources of wood specimens examined in this study are listed in Table 2. Wood segments from herbarium specimens were prepared for light (LM), transmis- sion electron (TEM), and scanning electron (SEM) microscopy according to the methods of Dute et al. (2008). For light microscopy, wood specimens from Cercocarpus mon- tanus and C. betuloides were cut transversely with a razor blade and the resulting seg- ments soaked in two changes of absolute ethanol (30 minutes apiece). The material was then placed in absolute acetone overnight followed by gradual infiltration of the speci- mens with Spurr’s resin (Spurr 1969). Cross sections of 1.5 µm were cut on a Sorvall MT-2b ultramicrotome using a glass knife. Sections were affixed to glass slides and stained using benzoate-buffered, aqueous toluidine blue O (TBO). Images were captured using a Nikon D-70 digital camera attached to a Nikon Biophot microscope. For TEM, Spurr’s-embedded material was sectioned at about 80 nm using a dia- mond knife mounted in the MT-2b ultramicrotome. The resulting ultrathin sections were placed on copper grids, stained either with 1% KMnO4 in 1% sodium citrate (Donaldson 2002) or with uranyl acetate/lead citrate, and observed with a Zeiss EM 10 transmission electron microscope using an accelerating voltage of 60 kV. Unstained sections were viewed as controls for the KMnO4 treatment. For SEM, herbarium specimens from all four species were split to expose either radial or tangential longitudinal surfaces and attached to aluminum stubs using carbon- impregnated double stick tape. Exposed wood surfaces were coated with gold-palladium. The resulting preparations were viewed with a Zeiss DSM 940 operated at 15 kV or a Zeiss EVO 50 at 20 kV. Living branches from four individuals of C. betuloides were collected on 17 June 2007 and on 7 July 2008 in California. The collecting sites were a series of road cuts in a chaparral environment at 752 m altitude on the Los Angeles County/San Ber- nardino County border. The coordinates are 34° 10' 38.68" N; 117° 40' 32.59" W. The specimens were returned on ice in plastic bags to Auburn and preserved the next day. Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 01:59:22PM via free access Dute, Patel & Jansen — Torus-bearing pit membranes 57 Routine procedures were used for TEM preparation of wood segments (Dute & Rushing 1988) that included glutaraldehyde primary fixation, osmium postfixation, dehydration and embedment in Spurr’s resin. Ultrathin sections were cut, placed on copper grids, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Monitor sections of 1.5 µm were cut, mounted on glass slides, and stained with TBO for viewing with LM. Spurr’s embedded herbarium material of C. montanus was sectioned transversely at 3 µm, mounted on glass slides, and stained with 0.01% acriflavin hydrochloride according to the procedure of Donaldson (2002). Qualitative lignin distribution was determined using fluorescence microscopy (Donaldson 2002; Coleman et al. 2004). Abbreviations used in the figures in this study: A = pit aperture; AN = annulus; M = margo of pit membrane; MI = microtubules; P = axial parenchyma cell; T = tracheid; TO = torus thicken- ing; V = vessel member. — Note: Figures 4, 5 & 7 are images of C. montanus; the remaining images are of C. betuloides. Figures 1–3. Torus location and anatomy. – 1: Cross section of Cercocarpus wood show- ing a vessel member, tracheids, and an axial parenchyma cell. Tori are indicated by un- labeled arrows. – 2: Aspirated pit membrane between two tracheids in an herbarium speci- men. Note the comparative diameter of the torus and that of the pit apertures.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Certified Habitat Plant List Native Woody Plants (Trees
    Louisiana Certified Habitat Plant List Native Woody Plants (trees, shrubs, woody vines) Common name Scientific name Stewartia Gum, Swamp Black Nyssa biflora Camellia, Silky malacodendron Acacia, Sweet Acacia farnesiana Catalpa Gum, Tupelo Nyssa aquatica Liquidambar Alder, Black/Hazel Alnus rugosa Catalpa, Southern bignonioides Gum, Sweet styriciflua Allspice, Carolina/ Cedar, Eastern Red Juniperus virginiana Sweet Shrub Calycanthus floridus Cedar, Hackberry Celtis laevigata Ashes, Native Fraxinus spp. Atlantic/Southern Chamaecyparis Hawthorn, Native Crataegus spp. White thyoides Hawthorn, Barberry- Ash, Green F. pennsylvanicum Cherry, Black Prunus serotina leaf C. berberifolia Ash, Carolina F. caroliniana Hawthorn, Cherry, Choke Aronia arbutifolia Ash, Pumpkin F. profunda Blueberry C. brachycantha Cherry-laurel Prunus caroliniana Hawthorn, Green C. viridis Ash, White F. americana Chinquapin Castanea pumila Hawthorn, Mayhaw C. aestivalis/opaca Rhododendron Coralbean, Azalea, Pink canescens Eastern/Mamou Erythrina herbacea Hawthorn, Parsley C. marshallii Azalea, Florida Rhododendron Crabapple, Southern Malus angustifolia Hickories, Native Carya spp. Flame austrinum Creeper, Trumpet Campsis radicans Hickory, Black C. texana Anise, Star Illicium floridanum Parthenocissus Anise, Hickory, Bitternut C. cordiformes Creeper, Virginia quinquefolia Yellow/Florida Illicium parviflorum Hickory, Mockernut C. tomentosa Azalea, Florida Rhododendron Crossvine Bignonia capreolata Flame austrinum Hickory, Nutmeg C. myristiciformes Cucumber Tree Magnolia acuminata Rhododendron Hickory, PECAN C. illinoensis Azalea, Pink canescens Cypress, Bald Taxodium distichum Hickory, Pignut C. glabra Rhododendron Cypress, Pond Taxodium ascendens serrulatum, Hickory, Shagbark C. ovata Cyrilla, Swamp/Titi Cyrilla racemiflora viscosum, Hickory, Azalea, White oblongifolium Cyrilla, Little-leaf Cyrilla parvifolia Water/Bitter Pecan C. aquatica Baccharis/ Groundsel Bush Baccharis halimifolia Devil’s Walkingstick Aralia spinosa Hollies, Native Ilex spp. Baccharis, Salt- Osmanthus Holly, American I.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Some Native Hill Country Trees Other Than Oaks
    Some Native Hill Country Trees Other Than Oaks Several weeks ago I wrote about the Hill Country oaks in this column. There are, however a number of common, large, native trees that are not oaks. Here are some of them. Bald cypress ( Taxodium distichum ) is common along the banks of the Guadalupe and its tributaries as well as many other streams in the Hill Country. It is unusual for a conifer (cone-bearing) tree to be deciduous (loses its leaves in the winter) which is why it is called a bald cypress. These trees were highly prized for the durability of the wood for making shingles, which led to the settlement of Kerrville. They are fast growing, and generally the largest trees in the Hill Country. Cedar elm ( Ulmus crassifolia ) is an elm with very small, stiff, rough leaves. It is common throughout the Hill Country where it appears to be equally at home on limestone soils or acidic soils. It flowers and sets seed in late summer, which is unusual, and, because not much is blooming then, it attracts many native bees when flowering. Its leaves turn yellow in the fall. Two other species of elms grow in the Hill Country, although they are not nearly as common as cedar elms. American elm ( Ulmus americana ) and Slippery elm ( Ulmus rubra ) are both large trees with large leaves and are usually found in riparian areas. Escarpment black cherry ( Prunus serotina var. eximia ) is a Hill Country native cherry with thin, soft leaves that turn yellow in the fall. The tiny white flowers are produced on stalks in the spring, followed by tiny cherries for the birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site
    Powell, Schmidt, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2005-1167 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2005-1167 February 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt , and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2005-1167 December 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B. F, C. A. Schmidt, and W. L. Halvorson. 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Fort Bowie National Historic Site.
    [Show full text]
  • F.3 References for Appendix F
    F-1 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F-2 F-3 APPENDIX F: ECOREGIONS OF THE 11 WESTERN STATES AND DISTRIBUTION BY ECOREGION OF WIND ENERGY RESOURCES ON BLM-ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN EACH STATE F.1 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE ECOREGIONS Ecoregions delineate areas that have a general similarity in their ecosystems and in the types, qualities, and quantities of their environmental resources. They are based on unique combinations of geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology (EPA 2004). Ecoregions are defined as areas having relative homogeneity in their ecological systems and their components. Factors associated with spatial differences in the quality and quantity of ecosystem components (including soils, vegetation, climate, geology, and physiography) are relatively homogeneous within an ecoregion. A number of individuals and organizations have characterized North America on the basis of ecoregions (e.g., Omernik 1987; CEC 1997; Bailey 1997). The intent of such ecoregion classifications has been to provide a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. The ecoregion discussions presented in this programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) follow the Level III ecoregion classification based on Omernik (1987) and refined through collaborations among U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional offices, state resource management agencies, and other federal agencies (EPA 2004). The following sections provide brief descriptions of each of the Level III ecoregions that have been identified for the 11 western states in which potential wind energy development may occur on BLM-administered lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Cercocarpus Montanus Cercocarpus Montanus ‘USU-CEMO-001’ ‘USU-CEMO- Was Collected As a Suspected Dwarf Plant in TM Moffat County, CO, on 20 June 2014
    HORTSCIENCE 55(11):1871–1875. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15343-20 Origin Cercocarpus montanus Cercocarpus montanus ‘USU-CEMO-001’ ‘USU-CEMO- was collected as a suspected dwarf plant in TM Moffat County, CO, on 20 June 2014. This 001’: A New Sego Supreme Plant unique, procumbent specimen was discovered laying over a rock on a windy ridge at an Asmita Paudel, Youping Sun, and Larry A. Rupp elevation of 2708 m (Fig. 2A). The appearance Center for Water Efficient Landscaping, Department of Plants, Soils, and looked different from the typical C. montanus Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 nearby (Fig. 2B). The leaves are smaller and narrower with less serrations compared with Richard Anderson the typical plants (Fig. 2C). Healthy cuttings USU Botanical Center, 725 Sego Lily Drive, Kaysville, UT 84037 were collected, wrapped in moist newspapers and placed on ice until transferred to a cooler at Additional index words. alder-leaf mountain mahogany, cutting propagation, landscape plant, 4 °C. On 21 June, the terminal cuttings were native plant, true mountain mahogany rinsed in 1% ZeroTol (27.1% hydrogen diox- ide, 2.0% peroxyacetic acid, 70.9% inert in- gredient; BioSafe Systems, Hartford, CT), Sego SupremeTM is a plant introduction mose style with elongated achenes wounded by scraping 1 cm of bark from the program developed by the Utah State Uni- (Fig. 1B) (Shaw et al., 2004). It possesses base of the cutting on one side, treated with versity (USU) Botanical Center (Anderson an extensive root system and adapts to 2000 mg·L–1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA)/1000 et al., 2014) to introduce native and adaptable medium to coarse textured soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarberry Plant Fact Sheet
    Plant Fact Sheet Wildlife: Many species of songbirds including SUGARBERRY mockingbirds and robins eat the fruit and use the tree for nesting habitat. It is a larval and nectar host for two Celtis laevigata Willd. butterflies: hackberry emperor (Asterocampa celtis) and Plant Symbol = CELA American snout (Libytheana carineta). White-tailed deer browse the leaves and fruit. Contributed by: USDA NRCS Plant Materials Program Other Uses: Sugarberry is used for furniture, athletic goods, firewood, and plywood. It has limited use for flooring, creating, and for wood posts. It is used as an ornamental and as a street tree in residential areas in the lower South Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g. threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description and Adaptation Sugarberry is a native tree that can grow up to 80 feet in height and up to 3 feet in diameter. It is a short lived tree, probably living not more than 150 years. It has a broad crown formed by spreading branches that are often drooped. The bark is light gray in color and can be smooth or covered with corky warts. The branchlets are covered with short hairs at first and eventually they become smooth. The leaves are alternated, simple, and slightly serrate. The leaves are 2-4 inches long and 1 to 2 Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA SCS, 1989. Midwest wetland flora: inches wide. The lance-shaped leaves gradually taper to a Field office illustrated guide to plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’S Letter
    Planning and planting for a better world Friends of the JC Raulston Arboretum Newsletter Number 3, Spring 1998 Director’s Letter Spring greetings from the JC Raulston Arboretum! This garden- ing season is in full swing, and the Arboretum is the place to be. Emergence is the word! Flowers and foliage are emerging every- where. We had a magnificent late winter and early spring. The Cornus mas ‘Spring Glow’ located in the paradise garden was exquisite this year. The bright yellow flowers are bright and persistent, and the Students from a Wake Tech Community College Photography Class find exfoliating bark and attractive habit plenty to photograph on a February day in the Arboretum. make it a winner. It’s no wonder that JC was so excited about this done soon. Make sure you check of themselves than is expected to seedling selection from the field out many of the special gardens in keep things moving forward. I, for nursery. We are looking to propa- the Arboretum. Our volunteer one, am thankful for each and every gate numerous plants this spring in curators are busy planting and one of them. hopes of getting it into the trade. preparing those gardens for The magnolias were looking another season. Many thanks to all Lastly, when you visit the garden I fantastic until we had three days in our volunteers who work so very would challenge you to find the a row of temperatures in the low hard in the garden. It shows! Euscaphis japonicus. We had a twenties. There was plenty of Another reminder — from April to beautiful seven-foot specimen tree damage to open flowers, but the October, on Sunday’s at 2:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarberry Dieback and Mortality Is an Expanding Forest Health Challenge Facing the Southern United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region State and Private Forestry R8–PR–02–19 December 2019 diseases involving phytoplasmas, which are pathogenic bacteria Sugarberry dieback and found in the phloem that are primarily moved by phloem- feeding insects. Phytoplasma species are known to be mortality associated with the dieback of European hackberry and the presence of phytoplasmas and their potential role in sugarberry Introduction dieback and mortality are a major focus of current investigations. Sugarberry (Celtis laevigata) is a common native tree up to 80 ft tall that is found throughout much of the South, ranging from southeastern Virginia to South Florida and west to central Texas. High rates of sugarberry mortality were first reported in Columbia, South Carolina in 2009. The issue has since expanded westward beyond the Savannah River and eastward to the coasts of South Carolina and Georgia (Fig. 1). Although mortality is most conspicuous in urban and residential areas, large numbers of sugarberry are dying in forested areas as well. This is by far the most severe and widespread episode of Celtis mortality known from the United States and the cause remains unknown. Symptoms Fig. 1. Map showing known affected locations. Colors represent Affected trees show progressive crown deterioration. Crown density of sugarberry (blue) and hackberry (green) in the thinning often begins at branch tips but ultimately spreads southeastern U.S. throughout the crown. Foliage of affected trees is typically chlorotic and stunted (Fig. 2A). The phloem, as visible beneath the bark of both the main stem and roots, is often brown in symptomatic trees (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with Special Emphasis on the African Species
    Contribution to the biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with special emphasis on the African species Ali Sattarian I Promotor: Prof. Dr. Ir. L.J.G. van der Maesen Hoogleraar Plantentaxonomie Wageningen Universiteit Co-promotor Dr. F.T. Bakker Universitair Docent, leerstoelgroep Biosystematiek Wageningen Universiteit Overige leden: Prof. Dr. E. Robbrecht, Universiteit van Antwerpen en Nationale Plantentuin, Meise, België Prof. Dr. E. Smets Universiteit Leiden Prof. Dr. L.H.W. van der Plas Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. A.M. Cleef Wageningen Universiteit Dr. Ir. R.H.M.J. Lemmens Plant Resources of Tropical Africa, WUR Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Biodiversiteit. II Contribution to the biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with special emphasis on the African species Ali Sattarian Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit Prof. Dr. M.J. Kropff in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 26 juni 2006 des namiddags te 16.00 uur in de Aula III Sattarian, A. (2006) PhD thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen ISBN 90-8504-445-6 Key words: Taxonomy of Celti s, morphology, micromorphology, phylogeny, molecular systematics, Ulmaceae and Celtidaceae, revision of African Celtis This study was carried out at the NHN-Wageningen, Biosystematics Group, (Generaal Foulkesweg 37, 6700 ED Wageningen), Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. IV To my parents my wife (Forogh) and my children (Mohammad Reza, Mobina) V VI Contents ——————————— Chapter 1 - General Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 - Evolutionary Relationships of Celtidaceae ..................................................................... 7 R. VAN VELZEN; F.T. BAKKER; A. SATTARIAN & L.J.G. VAN DER MAESEN Chapter 3 - Phylogenetic Relationships of African Celtis (Celtidaceae) ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional, Antioxidative, and Antimicrobial Analysis of The
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH Nutritional, antioxidative, and antimicrobial analysis of the Mediterranean hackberry (Celtis australis L.) Ajda Ota1, Ana Miklavcˇicˇ Višnjevec2, Rajko Vidrih1, Željko Prgomet3, Marijan Necˇemer4, Janez Hribar1, Nina Gunde Cimerman1,5, Sonja Smole Možina1, Milena Bucˇar-Miklavcˇicˇ2 & Nataša Poklar Ulrih1,5 1Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana SI-1000, Slovenia 2Science and Research Centre of Koper, University of Primorska, Zelena ulica 8, Izola SI-6310, Slovenia 3Agricultural Department in Poreč, University of Rijeka, Carla Huguesa 6, Porecˇ, Croatia 4Institute Jožef Stefan, Jamova cesta 39, Ljubljana SI-1000, Slovenia 5Centre of Excellence for Integrated Approaches in Chemistry and Biology of Proteins (CIPKeBiP), Jamova cesta 39, Ljubljana SI-1000, Slovenia Keywords Abstract Antimicrobial activity, Celtis australis, nutritional analysis, phenols, triple- Celtis australis is a deciduous tree commonly known as Mediterranean hackberry quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry, or the European nettle tree. The fruit of hackberry are seldom used for nutri- ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography tional purposes. The nutritional and physicochemical properties of ripe hackberry fruit from Istria (Marasi village near Vrsar, Croatia) were determined, including Correspondence water, total fiber, protein, vitamin, mineral, and phenolic contents. This analysis Nataša Poklar Ulrih, Department of Food Science and Technology,Biotechnical Faculty, demonstrates that the hackberry fruit is a valuable source of dietary fiber, pro- University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, tein, and vitamins, and of pigments such as lutein, β-carotene,­ zeaxanthin, and SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. tocopherols. The seasonal differences associated with the different growth stages Tel: +386 1 320 3780; for the element composition, total phenolic content, and phenolic profile were Fax: +386 1 256 6296; also determined for hackberry mesocarp and leaves.
    [Show full text]