Calvinism and Religious Toleration in France and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Calvinism and Religious Toleration in France and The CALVINISM AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN FRANCE AND THE NETHERLANDS, 1555-1609 by David L. Robinson Bachelor of Arts, Memorial University of Newfoundland (Sir Wilfred Grenfell College), 2011 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Academic Unit of History Supervisor: Gary K. Waite, PhD, History Examining Board: Cheryl Fury, PhD, History, UNBSJ Sean Kennedy, PhD, Chair, History Gary K. Waite, PhD, History Joanne Wright, PhD, Political Science This thesis is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK May, 2011 ©David L. Robinson, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91828-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91828-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. Canada ABSTRACT The similarities and connections between the French Wars of Religion and the Dutch Revolt have long been understood by historians. However, despite recognition of these similarities, there has been very little comparative study of the two regions. This thesis compares the Calvinist relationship to the changing views toward and practice of religious toleration within the two regions in an effort to understand how the varying political circumstances affected this religious reform movement. The first chapter outlines the historiography of both regions giving some background on the development of the French and Dutch Calvinist Reformations. The second chapter focuses on French Calvinism showing an increasing support of religious toleration for Roman Catholics as the religious civil wars dragged on, at least until peace could be established allowing for a continuation of Calvinist reformation. Chapter three notes a similar pattern in the Netherlands until around 1580 when Calvinists, who were now favoured with state church status in the northern rebel provinces, abandoned advocacy of toleration for Catholics while seeking to bring about further reformation. However, because of the presence of numerous religious minorities such as the Mennonites, and the reluctance of the government to persecute most religious dissenters, the Dutch Calvinists largely accepted their position in the multi-confessional society of the United Provinces (membership in the national Reformed Church was not compulsory). The final chapter explains the similarities and differences in the two Calvinist movements concluding that Calvinism proved to be very adaptable in its views of toleration. Their views were determined by their political circumstances. To achieve their ultimate goal of complete reformation, the Calvinists were sometimes advocates of toleration, and sometimes opponents. Table of Contents ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1: Introduction.........................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Calvinism and Religious Toleration in France 1559-1598.............................. 43 The Conspiracy of Amboise, the Colloquy of Poissy, and the First Civil Wars: 1559- 1572 ................................................................................................................................ 48 The French Calvinists and Religious Toleration after 1572..........................................68 Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 94 Chapter 3: Calvinism in a multi-confessional Society: Dutch Calvinists and Religious Toleration 1566-1609 ........................................................................................................ 96 Spanish Tyranny, Papal Inquisition, and Civil War, 1566-1584...................................98 Calvinists, Magistrates, and the Religious Other in the Early United Provinces 1572- 1609...............................................................................................................................121 Conclusion....................................................................................................................142 Chapter 4: Calvinism and Religious Toleration in Comparative Perspective.................147 Bibliography.....................................................................................................................170 Primary Sources:...........................................................................................................170 Secondary Sources:.......................................................................................................172 Curriculum Vitae Chapter 1: Introduction The 1998 Hollywood filmElizabeth opens with a graphic scene of the execution of three Protestants during the reign of the English Queen Mary. Although the film is riddled with historical inaccuracies, this opening scene is reflective of the common perception of early-modern Europe as rampant with religious intolerance. Certainly there is much truth to this perception, but, as is usually the case with history, the reality of things is more nuanced. Recently, some historians have noted the varying degrees of religious toleration, or peaceful co-existence of multiple religious communities, practiced across Europe in the early-modern period.1 Naturally, the practice of religious tolerance varied from region to region, and thus a comparative look at different contexts in which religious tolerance arose is informative of the conditions which promoted such toleration or, conversely, discouraged it. France and the Netherlands are regions particularly suitable to a comparative approach since both countries experienced rapid Calvinist reformation, prolonged civil wars, and a resulting debate over the issue of religious toleration. In both cases the Calvinist goal of complete reformation became intertwined with political struggles creating religiously divided political factions resulting in long-lasting civil wars. In both cases, neither the Catholics nor Protestants were able to decisively defeat their opponent. 1 Perhaps the most notable example being, Benjamin Kaplan,Divided By Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice o f Toleration in Early Modem Europe (Cambridge, Mass., 2007). 1 Calvinists have often been portrayed both popularly and scholarly as deeply intolerant of other religious beliefs, and deviant social behaviour.2 However, through an examination of the writings of several Dutch and French Calvinists (or Huguenots as they were often known in France), it becomes clear that Reformed Christians held a variety of opinions regarding the desirability of peaceful co-existence with other religious groups. What united the Calvinists was their goal of complete reformation along Calvinist lines. Such a goal appears to leave no room for acceptance of religious toleration. Nevertheless, as a result of the changing political circumstances, French and Dutch Calvinists often did become committed proponents of toleration of other beliefs when it was consistent with their ultimate goal of reformation. Similarly, conformity to Calvin’s complicated views on toleration occurred only when political circumstances allowed it. The evidence used for this thesis comes from a variety of French and Dutch pamphlets spanning the period between 1SS9 and 1609. Because a research trip to Europe was not feasible, a major factor in the selection of these pamphlets was their availability. However, an effort was made to ensure that the pamphlets were representative of the development of Calvinist thought on religious toleration. This was done through selection
Recommended publications
  • Mali 2018 International Religious Freedom Report
    MALI 2018 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution prohibits religious discrimination and grants individuals freedom of religion in conformity with the law. The law criminalizes abuses against religious freedom. On January 31, the government adopted a new national Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) strategy that included interfaith efforts and promotion of religious tolerance. The Ministry of Religious Affairs and Worship was responsible for administering the national CVE strategy, in addition to promoting religious tolerance and coordinating national religious activities such as pilgrimages and religious holidays for followers of all religions. Terrorist groups used violence and launched attacks against civilians, security forces, peacekeepers, and others they reportedly perceived as not adhering to their interpretation of Islam. In the center of the country, affiliates of Jamaat Nasr al- Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) attacked multiple towns in Mopti Region, threatening Christian, Muslim, and traditional religious communities, reportedly for heresy. Muslim religious leaders condemned extremist interpretations of sharia, and non- Muslim religious leaders condemned religious extremism. Some Christian missionaries expressed concern about the increased influence in remote areas of organizations they characterized as violent and extremist. Religious leaders, including Muslims and Catholics, jointly called for peace among all faiths at a celebration marking Eid al-Fitr in June hosted by President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita. In January Muslim, Protestant, and Catholic religious leaders called for peace and solidary among faiths at a conference organized by the youth of the Protestant community. The president of the High Islamic Council of Mali (HCI) and other notable religious leaders announced the necessity for all religious leaders to work toward national unity and social cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 4 April 2019
    United Nations A/RES/73/285 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 April 2019 Seventy-third session Agenda item 72 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 2 April 2019 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/73/L.79 and A/73/L.79/Add.1)] 73/285. Combating terrorism and other acts of violence based on religion or belief The General Assembly, Recalling that all States have pledged themselves, under the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1 to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, Recalling also its relevant resolutions, including resolution 73/164 of 17 December 2018 on combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief, and resolution 73/176 of 17 December 2018 on freedom of religion or belief, Reaffirming that discrimination against human beings on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter, Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination and violence on the basis of religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and effective protection of the law, Recalling that States have the primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights, including the human rights of persons belonging to religious minorities, including their right to exercise their religion or belief freely, Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance and discrimination and acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief, __________________ 1 Resolution 217 A (III).
    [Show full text]
  • 1.10 Religious Privilege, Tolerance and Discrimination (Part 2) – What Are They?
    EXPLORING SECULARISM THEME 1. CORE PRINCIPLES 1.10 Religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination (part 2) – What are they? BACKGROUND Concepts of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination are central to secularism. They come up in other resources and can be brought up in almost any discussion of religion in public life. Resources 1.10 and 1.11 address these directly and encourage students to engage with different viewpoints on these central terms. The resource contains three stimuli; the first defines these key terms, the second provides examples and the third compares privilege and discrimination. The exercises assess students’ background knowledge and invite discussion of the examples and differing opinions on the key concepts. SUBJECTS Politics | Religion & Belief Education | Citizenship | SMSC | Fundamental British Values KEY QUESTIONS • What are religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination? LEARNING Basic OUTCOMES Students should demonstrate they can: • Understand the basic principles of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination. • Identify and comment on the role of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination in simplistic examples of conflicts involving religion and the rights of others. Advanced In addition to the basic learning outcomes, students should demonstrate they can: • Critically reflect on the principles of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination, drawing on a range of outside examples. • Offer nuanced comments on the role of religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination in a range of social debates involving religion and the rights of others. LINKS Resource page: ExploringSecularism.org/110-religious-privilege-toleranc STIMULUS Stimulus #1 (Principles) What are religious privilege, tolerance and discrimination? Privilege, tolerance and discrimination are key concepts within sociology and social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Calvin Bibliography
    2012 Calvin Bibliography Compiled by Paul W. Fields and Andrew M. McGinnis (Research Assistant) I. Calvin’s Life and Times A. Biography B. Cultural Context—Intellectual History C. Cultural Context—Social History D. Friends E. Polemical Relationships II. Calvin’s Works A. Works and Selections B. Criticism and Interpretation III. Calvin’s Theology A. Overview B. Revelation 1. Scripture 2. Exegesis and Hermeneutics C. Doctrine of God 1. Overview 2. Creation 3. Knowledge of God 4. Providence 5. Trinity D. Doctrine of Christ E. Doctrine of the Holy Spirit F. Doctrine of Humanity 1. Overview 2. Covenant 3. Ethics 4. Free Will 5. Grace 6. Image of God 7. Natural Law 8. Sin G. Doctrine of Salvation 1. Assurance 2. Atonement 1 3. Faith 4. Justification 5. Predestination 6. Sanctification 7. Union with Christ H. Doctrine of the Christian Life 1. Overview 2. Piety 3. Prayer I. Ecclesiology 1. Overview 2. Discipline 3. Instruction 4. Judaism 5. Missions 6. Polity J. Worship 1. Overview 2. Images 3. Liturgy 4. Music 5. Preaching 6. Sacraments IV. Calvin and Social-Ethical Issues V. Calvin and Economic and Political Issues VI. Calvinism A. Theological Influence 1. Overview 2. Christian Life 3. Church Discipline 4. Ecclesiology 5. Holy Spirit 6. Predestination 7. Salvation 8. Worship B. Cultural Influence 1. Arts 2. Cultural Context—Intellectual History 2 3. Cultural Context—Social History 4. Education 5. Literature C. Social, Economic, and Political Influence D. International Influence 1. Australia 2. Eastern Europe 3. England 4. Europe 5. France 6. Geneva 7. Germany 8. Hungary 9. India 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary-General of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism
    Remarks by Mr. Vladimir Voronkov, Under- Secretary-General of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism “Countering Terrorism and other acts of Violence based on Religion or Belief: Fostering Tolerance and Inclusivity” 24 June 2019 Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to thank Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi and Ambassador Feridun Hadi Sinirlioğlu for organizing this important event and inviting UNOCT to partner. I also welcome Archobisp Bernardito Auza, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations. In recent months, we have witnessed horrific attacks against places of worship that have claimed many innocent lives, spread fear, and contributed to growing polarization and intolerance around the world. Many of these attacks have sought to exploit existing religious tensions and grievances. There has also been an alarming rise in hate speech, xenophobia and other forms of bigotry, which can incite violence. For instance, we have seen a resurgence of anti-Semitism and Neo-Nazi organizations, while attacks on Muslims in several societies are on the rise. These worrying developments raise much broader questions for the international community related to our efforts to maintain peace and security. 1 How can we promote tolerance and peaceful co-existence in an era of globalization when there are unprecedented human interactions taking place, both online and offline, across boundaries of faith and culture? Are our societies ready to cope with a hyper-connected world? And most importantly, how can we work together to promote tolerant and inclusive societies in unstable and fragile environments? These are critical questions, for which, unfortunately, we do not seem to have a definite answer.
    [Show full text]
  • A/69/261 General Assembly
    United Nations A/69/261 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 August 2014 Original: English Sixty-ninth session Item 69 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 68/170. * A/69/150. 14-58756 (E) 250814 *1458756* A/69/261 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Summary In the present report, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, provides an overview of his mandate activities since the submission of the previous report to the General Assembly (A/68/290), including his reports to the Human Rights Council and on country visits, as well as communications and highlights of presentations and consultations. The Special Rapporteur then focuses on means to eliminate religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace, a theme which he thinks warrants more systematic attention. The sources of religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace can be manifold and include prejudices existing among employers, employees or customers, restrictive interpretations of corporate identity or a general fear of religious diversity. After clarifying that the human right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief also relates to manifestations of religious diversity in the workplace, the Special Rapporteur particularly deals with measures of “reasonable accommodation” that may be needed to overcome discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordained Servant: Index of Contributors, Vol. 1-22
    Ordained Servant: Index of Contributors, vol. 1-22 Adams, Jay E. “Help in Using the Original Languages in Preaching” 3:1 (Jan. 1994): 23. _____. “Working with the Eldership” 1:2 (Apr. 1992): 27-29. Alexander, J. W. “Ministerial Study” 1:3 (Sep. 1992): 69-71. Allis, Oswald T. “The Time Element in Genesis 1 and 2” 4:4 (Oct. 1995): 85-87. Allison, Archibald Alexander. “Biblical Qualifications for Deacons, Part 1” 6:1 (Jan. 1997): 4-9. _____. “Biblical Qualifications for Deacons, Part 2” 6:2 (Apr. 1997): 31-36. _____. “Biblical Qualifications for Deacons, Part 3” 6:3 (Jul. 1997): 49-54. _____. “Biblical Qualifications for Elders” 3:4 (Oct. 1994): 80-96. _____. “The Biblical View of Church Unity” 10:3 (Jul. 2001): 60-64. _____. “Visiting the Members” 10:2 (Apr. 2001): 27-30. Allison, Sam. Review of What is a True Calvinist? by Philip Graham Ryken. 13:1 (Jan. 2004): 20. Anderson, R. Dean, Jr. “Are Deacons Members of the Session?” 2: 4 (Oct. 1993): 75-78. _____. “An Examination of the Liturgy of the Westminster Assembly” 3:2 (Apr. 1994): 27-34. _____. “On the Laying on of Hands” 13:2 (Apr. 2004): 44-48. _____. “Some Consequences of Sex Before Marriage” 9:4 (Oct. 2000): 86-88. _____. “Use of the Word ‘Amen’” 7:4 (Oct. 1998): 81-84. Bahnsen, Greg L. “Church Government Briefly Considered” 4:1 (Jan. 1995): 9-10. _____. “Is It Our Moral Obligation to Attend Church?” 4:2 (Apr. 1995): 40-42. Ball, Larry E. “The Post-Modern Paradigm Shift and the Biblical, Reformed Presuppositionalism of Van Til” 5:4 (Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto ASPECTS OF ARMINIAN SOTERIOLOGY IN METHODIST-LUTHERAN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUES IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY Mikko Satama Master’s Thesis University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology Department of Systematic Theology Ecumenical Studies 18th January 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta Systemaattisen teologian laitos Tekijä − Författare Mikko Satama Työn nimi − Arbetets title Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20th and 21st Century Oppiaine − Läroämne Ekumeniikka Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal Pro Gradu -tutkielma 18.1.2009 94 Tiivistelmä − Referat The aim of this thesis is to analyse the key ecumenical dialogues between Methodists and Lutherans from the perspective of Arminian soteriology and Methodist theology in general. The primary research question is defined as: “To what extent do the dialogues under analysis relate to Arminian soteriology?” By seeking an answer to this question, new knowledge is sought on the current soteriological position of the Methodist-Lutheran dialogues, the contemporary Methodist theology and the commonalities between the Lutheran and Arminian understanding of soteriology. This way the soteriological picture of the Methodist-Lutheran discussions is clarified. The dialogues under analysis were selected on the basis of versatility. Firstly, the sole world organisation level dialogue was chosen: The Church – Community of Grace. Additionally, the document World Methodist Council and the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is analysed as a supporting document. Secondly, a document concerning the discussions between two main-line churches in the United States of America was selected: Confessing Our Faith Together.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Tolerance - Intolerance in India
    RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE - INTOLERANCE IN INDIA Dr. Xavier Kochuparampil India is the cradle of four world religions: Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism. Two other world religions, namely Christianity and Islam came to this country in the first century of their existence. For centuries Christians were living in India side by side with the vast majority of non-Christians, mainly Hindus. Though known for centuries as a land of religious tolerance and non-violence, in India communal disharmony, religious intolerance, fundamentalism, and all kinds of violence are on the increase. Why this paradigm shift in the attitude of the Indian people? This short article is an attempt to understand some of the new trends in the realm of communal harmony in India. A Democratic Republic The question of religious tolerance or intolerance depends very much on the encounter between the different religions that co-exist in the same land. For centuries Indians have lived in a religiously pluralistic society. Though all the major religions of the world have their followers in India, Hinduism is the most dominant religion of India with about 80 % of the whole population of about 950 million. Yet one has to acknowledge the fact that the Indian nation is not constitutionally Hindu nation like the numerous Islamic or Christian nations of the world. Constitutionally India remains a democratic sovereign republic where all religions are of equal status. Moreover, the so-called minority communities (religions) do enjoy certain constitutionally granted privileges. Attitude of Tolerance The traditional Hindu attitude to Christianity and Islam was one of tolerance. The existence of the small community of Christians in South India from the very first century of Christianity is the best proof for this attitude of tolerance in Hinduism.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology of the Westminster Confession, the Larger Catechism, and The
    or centuries, countless Christians have turned to the Westminster Standards for insights into the Christian faith. These renowned documents—first published in the middle of the 17th century—are widely regarded as some of the most beautifully written summaries of the F STANDARDS WESTMINSTER Bible’s teaching ever produced. Church historian John Fesko walks readers through the background and T he theology of the Westminster Confession, the Larger Catechism, and the THEOLOGY The Shorter Catechism, helpfully situating them within their original context. HISTORICAL Organized according to the major categories of systematic theology, this book utilizes quotations from other key works from the same time period CONTEXT to shed light on the history and significance of these influential documents. THEOLOGY & THEOLOGICAL of the INSIGHTS “I picked up this book expecting to find a resource to be consulted, but of the found myself reading the whole work through with rapt attention. There is gold in these hills!” MICHAEL HORTON, J. Gresham Machen Professor of Systematic Theology and Apologetics, Westminster Seminary California; author, Calvin on the Christian Life WESTMINSTER “This book is a sourcebook par excellence. Fesko helps us understand the Westminster Confession and catechisms not only in their theological context, but also in their relevance for today.” HERMAN SELDERHUIS, Professor of Church History, Theological University of Apeldoorn; FESKO STANDARDS Director, Refo500, The Netherlands “This is an essential volume. It will be a standard work for decades to come.” JAMES M. RENIHAN, Dean and Professor of Historical Theology, Institute of Reformed Baptist Studies J. V. FESKO (PhD, University of Aberdeen) is academic dean and professor of systematic and historical theology at Westminster Seminary California.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Action for Religious Leaders and Actors to Prevent Incitement to Violence That Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes
    P L A N O F A C T I O N F O R R E L I G I O U S L E A D E R S A N D A C T O R S T O P R E V E N T I N C I T E M E N T T O V I O L E N C E T H A T C O U L D L E A D T O A T R O C I T Y C R I M E S dreamcherry.com Foreword by the Secretary-General of the United Nations We have all seeN the tragic coNsequeNces of UNfortuNately, religioN has sometimes beeN our failure to preveNt serious violatioNs of cyNically distorted to justify iNcitemeNt to humaN rights aNd iNterNatioNal humaNitariaN violeNce aNd discrimiNatioN, aNd it is vital that law aNd, iN the worst cases, atrocity crimes. religious leaders from all faiths show These crimes cause immeNse sufferiNg, leadership. uNdermiNe prospects for peace aNd developmeNt, aNd leave scars oN commuNities This PlaN of ActioN, the result of two years of aNd societies that caN take geNeratioNs to heal. coNsultatioNs with leaders from differeNt faiths aNd religioNs arouNd the world, iNcludes a rich Atrocity crimes do Not geNerally happeN aNd broad raNge of suggestioNs for ways iN suddeNly or spoNtaNeously. The processes which religious leaders aNd actors caN preveNt leadiNg to them take time to uNfold – time we iNcitemeNt to violeNce aNd coNtribute to peace should use to act oN the warNiNg sigNs.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinism and the Arts: a Re-Assessment
    Durham E-Theses Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment Joby, Christopher Richard How to cite: Joby, Christopher Richard (2005) Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2873/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Abstract Calvinism and the arts: A re-assessment Although many believe John Calvin had a negative attitude towards the arts, particularly visual art, my contention is that we find within his writings and the development of the Reformed tradition a more positive attitude to the arts than has hitherto been recognized. In chapters one and two, I look in detail at Calvin's own writings. I begin by examining exactly what type of visual art he rejected and what type he affirmed. I then look at how his eschatology and epistemology, particularly his use of the metaphor of mirror, allow us to argue for the placing of certain types of art within Reformed churches, notably history and landscape paintings.
    [Show full text]