Precambrian Basement Geologic Map of Montana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Precambrian Basement Geologic Map of Montana U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 2829 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Version 1.0 116° 114° 112° 110° 108° 106° 104° CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS 115° 105° COVER ROCKS Outline of figure 2 ၥv CENOZOIC TRAN MESOPROTEROZOIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS ne ANA t belt OROGEN • Plentywood Yb Yy S-HUDSO • Scobey MESOPROTEROZOIC DANIELS UNITS OF TRANS-HUDSON OROGEN nd-thrus SHERIDAN Dillon shear zo Little Belt N Xt PALEOPROTEROZOIC TRANS-MONT Mountains na fold-a Western boundary OROGEN Amh GLACIER UNITS OF TRANS-MONTANA OROGEN of continent (ACCRETED TERRANES) ns-Monta • Cut Bank STRUCTURE Tra TOOLE Xwv Xi Chinook Xw PALEOPROTEROZOIC Beartooth • VINCE LINCOLN LIBERTY HILL Ats Mountains • Havre 45° MONTANA • Shelby • Chester Amh • Libby ARCHEAN Bighorn Amh UNITS OF CONTINENTAL-MARGIN ASSEMBLAGE WYOMING PRO Mountains ONE (FOLD-AND-THRUST BELT) Xt BLAINE • Malta VALLEY ROOSEVELT Xfb FLATHEAD Rocky Moun PALEOPROTEROZOIC Sevier thrust front JOPLIN Xm XAr • PONDERA PHILLIPS Glasgow Kalispell • Wg Wgf ARCHEAN tains ALLS SHEAR Z Aum • Conrad Wolf Point Wind River • 48° 48° UNITS OF WYOMING PROVINCE Mountains (CRATON) Eastern limit of GREAT F Basin and Wsc Range OROGEN LATE ARCHEAN extension Wgf Ag Ats Uinta Mountains Little Agn ° Wgf VUs MIDDLE TO EARLY ARCHEAN 40 Front Rocky Range Mountains Colorado COLORADO Choteau CHOTEAU Ats RICHLAND Sidney Sawatch • TETON Agn Ag • Plateau Fort Benton • Range SANDERS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Polson • COVER ROCKS • Thompson Falls Amh ၥv MCCONE Volcanic rocks (Cenozoic) LAKE Figure 1. Precambrian-cored uplifts (colored) of Rocky Mountain region. MESOPROTEROZOIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS Xw Yb Belt Supergroup (Mesoproterozoic)—Area containing major bodies patterned Great Falls • Yy Yellowjacket Formation and associated metasedimentary rocks (Mesoproterozoic)—Area containing major bodies patterned GARFIELD • Circle DAWSON TRANS-HUDSON OROGEN 120° 115° 110° 105° LEWIS AND CLARK TECTONIC ZONE Jordan Xt • Xt Volcanic-plutonic arc complexes (Paleoproterozoic)—Includes Archean gneisses Superior Accreted terranes Trans- • CASCADE TRANS-MONTANA OROGEN (ACCRETED TERRANES) GFSZ FERGUS DSZ EXPLANATION LEWIS & CLARK • Glendive Xw Wallace terrane (Paleoproterozoic)—Covered Aeromagnetic anomaly MINERAL Hudso PETROLEUM LC (nanoTeslas) Stanford Xwv Wallace • WIBAUX Biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss and amphibolite of Wallace terrane C (Paleoproterozoic)—Exposed in Bitterroot Range terrane 500 MISSOULA ED • CZ CF Lewistown Agn Wibaux n oroge • AR Xi Granite, diorite, and gneiss (Paleoproterozoic)—Crops out in Little Belt JUDITH BASIN C Mountains. U-Pb zircon age of 1,860–1,880 Ma (Mueller and others, Little • Winnett R 2002) Xi Belt E Allochthonous Ats n GARNET LINE Mountains PRAIRIE EK FA Amh Medicine Hat block (Archean)—Covered ° Missoula • 45 terranes 0 CONTINENTAL-MARGIN ASSEMBLAGE (FOLD-AND-THRUST BELT) • ana fold-and-thrust belt POWELL Terry Xi Agn U XAr Imbricately intercalated rocks (Paleoproterozoic and Archean)—Covered Wyoming Agn LT Xfb Meta-sandstone, shale, iron-formation, and graphitic shale intruded by craton gabbro dikes (Paleoproterozoic)—Crops out in Gravelly Range. Interpreted as foreland basin deposit Trans-MontSR Xm Marble, quartzite, and schist (Paleoproterozoic)—Inferred to have formed on –300 Xw MEAGHER Ag a rifted, passive margin (about 2.0 Ga). Formerly regarded as Archean • Helena Fault—Solid dots indicate rifted Wg Massive to weakly foliated granite to granodiorite (Late Archean) Agn continental margin separated • White Sulphur Spring SF CB Wgf Foliated and gneissic granitoid rocks (Late Archean)—About 2.74–2.79 Ga by transform (inherited) Baker WHEATLAND • (Wooden and others, 1988) faults. Opposed arrows MUSSELSHELL • Miles City • show relative displacement GRANITE • Harlowton Roundup Aum Mafic to ultramafic rocks in Spanish Peaks area and Tobacco Root • Deer Lodge Xw GOLDEN VALLEY ROSEBUD FALLON Mountains (Archean) ince Thrust fault CUSTER 40° • Philipsburg Townsend WYOMING PROVINCE (CRATON) • • Colorado prov • Hamilton Ryegate Hysham • Forsyth • Ag Wsc Stillwater Complex (Late Archean)—2.7 Ga (Wooden and others, 1988). • Boulder Exposed BROADWATER Wgf TREASURE Foliated and gneissic granitoid rocks (Late Archean)—About 2.74–2.79 Ga 02125 50 500 KILOMETERS JEFFERSON Agn (Wooden and others, 1988). Exposed • Anaconda ° Yb ° 46 RAVALLI 46 Ag Granitic rocks, undivided (Archean)—Magmatic domain. Covered Figure 2. Aeromagnetic anomaly map of northwestern United States showing major Precambrian terrane boundaries and principal Proterozoic faults and shear zones. CB, Agn Agn Gneissic rocks, undivided (Archean)—Gneiss domain. Covered Cheyenne belt suture; CF, Cedar Creek fault; CZ, Clearwater zone; DSZ, Dillon shear (suture) zone; GFSZ, Great Falls shear zone; LC, Lewis and Clark fault zone; SF, DEER LODGE Butte Snake River fault zone; SR, Snake River Plain volcanic field. Aeromagnetic map prepared by North American Magnetic Anomaly Group (2002). • VUs Supracrustal (metasedimentary and metavolcanic) rocks (Middle to Early • Ekalaka XAr YELLOWSTONE Archean) SILVER BOW Yb Ats Tectonically shortened rocks on margins of Wyoming province (Archean) erroot Range PERRY LINE Xwv Ag Yb Highland Mountains • Big Timber Ag Contact—Dashed where approximately located Tobacco Root • Billings Bitt Mountains Wgf NW SE Yb Wgf • Hardin Strike-slip fault—Dashed where inferred. Opposed arrows show direction of PARK displacement where known Rifted continental margin Northern Madison Bozeman SWEET GRASS Range • Ag CARTER Xw Xwv • Livingston STILLWATER Ag Thrust fault (Laramide) Wgf • Columbus Agn Trench(?) Xwv Thrust fault (Sevier) GALLATIN Agn BIG HORN Thrust fault (Paleoproterozoic)—Dashed where approximately located • Broadus Aum Wgf Xm Strike and dip direction of foliation POWDER RIVER rust(?) Lithospheric mantle Wgf Spanish Wsc Trend of foliation VUs Agn Oceanic c MADISON Peaks Drill hole to basement rocks • ၥv Beartooth Mount Stage 1 Ennis CARBON RE ZONE BEAVERHEAD Aum Fold-and-thrust Active foredeep Wgf ains • Dillon Xm belt migrating southeast DILLON SUTU Xm • Red Lodge Wg Ag Ag VUs Ruby Wgf Range Ag Madison Wgf Gravelly Wgf Range Wgf NE Wgf Range Xfb Xm HEAR ZO Wgf XAr Stage 2 Wgf LAKE S EXPLANATION E ZONE SCALE 1:1 000 000 MIRROR 25 0 25 50 75 100 MILES Trench and foredeep deposits Continental crust (Wyoming craton) Wgf Xm 25 0255075 100 KILOMETERS ၥv Passive-margin deposits Thrust fault—Showing relative MADISON MYLONIT displacement Volcanic arcs and microcontinents Digitizing by Eric Anderson. Wgf Editing and digital cartography by Alessandro J. Donatich, Lambert conformal conic projection Central Publications Group. Figure 3. Model for evolution of the Trans-Montana orogen. Stage 1—Passive margin deposits accumulate on continental edge approaching a north-dipping subduction zone. Stage 2—Active subduction of the continental margin during 1927 North American datum Manuscript approved for publication March 31, 2004 convergence results in craton-vergent imbricate thrusting of the volcanic and sedimentary rocks and their basement. Modified from Hoffman (1987). Generalized for simplicity. 114° 112° 110° 108° 106° INTRODUCTION magnetization of the crystalline basement rocks and the structures that penetrate delineation of predominantly granitoid rocks from predominantly metasedimentary- age of the terrane has been provided by isotopic studies of the Bitterroot lobe of amalgamated prior to collision along the Dillon suture zone. Impetus for and Stein, 2003) along the Cheyenne belt (Duebendorfer and Houston, 1987) at important Mesoproterozoic Trans-Rocky Mountains fault system has been meager. Kucks, R.P., and Hill, P.L., 2000, Wyoming aeromagnetic and gravity maps and Archean tectonic and depositional history of the Wyoming Province: 120° 115° 110° 105° and transect the basement. In northwestern Montana, the thick (15–20 km) metavolcanic units; (2) the prominent northeast-trending belt of linear anomalies the Idaho batholith in eastern Idaho. Inherited (pre-magmatic) zircons in Late convergence is attributed to closing of the inferred Paleoproterozoic ocean about 1.78 Ga (Chamberlain, 1998). Tweto (1980) first described some major segments of this ancient structural system data—A website for distribution of data: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Precambrian Research, v. 117, p. 119–143. Newly updated aeromagnetic data of Montana, in conjunction with the known sedimentary succession of the Belt Supergroup largely obscures the magnetic fabric across the central part of the State, caused by major ductile shear zones within the Cretaceous igneous rocks of the lobe have a minimum age of about 1.74 Ga between the accreted terranes and the craton (fig. 3). in Colorado, but others (for example, Hamilton, 1988) have disputed significant Report 00–0198, scale 1:1,000,000. Ross, G.M., 2002, Evolution of Precambrian continental lithosphere in western Accreted terranes geologic framework of basement rocks in the State, have been combined to of the underlying crystalline rocks. Accordingly, the basement geologic fabric in Paleoproterozoic Trans-Montana orogen; (3) the conspicuous northwest- to west- (Mueller and others, 1995), and a large granitic gneiss xenolith with a comparable Correlation of the magmatic arc rocks in central Montana with the Wallace PALEOPROTEROZOIC TECTONIC STRUCTURES Phanerozoic reactivation of these structures, and even doubted their existence. Kulik, D.M., and Schmidt, C.J., 1988, Region of overlap and styles of interaction Canada—Results from Lithoprobe studies in Alberta and beyond: Canadian Tran produce a new
Recommended publications
  • Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho
    Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho By J. E. HARRISON and D. J. GRIMES CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1312-O A comparison of rocks from two widely separated areas in Belt terrane UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 75-607766 4- V For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 35 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................................................................................. Ol Introduction ............................:.................................... .......................................... 2 General geology ...............................................................;.'................................... 3 Methods of investigation ........................y .............................................................. 7 Sampling procedure ..............................:....................................................... 7 Analytical technique for mineralogy ...............:............................................ 11 Analytical technique and calculations for geochemistry................................ 13 Mineralogy of rock types........................................................................................ 29 Geochemistry .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000
    Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000 | MLS #319648 │ 36.7± Acres www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 1 - INTRODUCTION The Home on the Ruby Range offering provides a peaceful, semi-private setting with outstanding views of the Ruby Mountain Range as a backdrop to the West and the famed Ruby River Valley and Tobacco Root Mountains to the East with five other mountain ranges prominently visible. The nicely appointed two story residence and irrigated farm land add comfortable living space and economical agricultural resources to the offering package. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 2 - LOCATION The property is less than 2 miles from MT Highway 287 and approximately 12 miles Southeast of the small town of Sheridan. Access to the property is via County Road known as Ruby River Drive and private, maintained gravel road known as Patrick Lane. Bozeman, Butte and Dillon are all within a 1.5 hour drive from the property and offer additional increased social and commercial amenities. Butte and Bozeman each have re- cently expanded international airports. Please see property location map, attached. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 3 - ACREAGE The property consists of a total of 36.7± surveyed acres with approximately 32± acres that are irrigated crop and pasture. The terrain is moderately sloped and has abundant irri- gation water delivered by low cost gravity flow system from the West Bench Canal. The property is sprinkler irrigated by two wheel lines.
    [Show full text]
  • High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: a Possible Mountain Tradition Connection
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management Department of Anthropology 5-2020 High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection Arian Randall Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds Recommended Citation Randall, Arian, "High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection" (2020). Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management. 34. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds/34 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection by Arian L. Randall A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Cultural Resource Management, Archaeology May 6, 2020 Thesis Committee: Mark Muñiz, Chairperson Rob Mann Lauri Travis 2 Abstract The Sundog site (24LC2289) was first discovered in 2013 during a field school survey with Carroll College and the Helena-Lewis & Clark National Forest. This archaeological site is located at an elevation of 6,400ft above sea-level in the Northern Big Belt Mountains in Montana. The Sundog Site is a multi- component site with occupations from the Late Paleoindian period to the Late Prehistoric period. This site is significant due to its intact cultural deposits in a high-altitude park, in an elevational range that currently has a data gap.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ca. 1.45 Ga), WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: PSEUDOFOSSILS, FACIES, TIDES and SYNDEPOSITIONAL TECTONIC ACTIVITY in a MESOPROTEROZOIC INTRACRATONIC BASIN
    SEDIMENTARY, MICROBIAL AND DEFORMATION FEATURES IN THE LOWER BELT SUPERGROUP (ca. 1.45 Ga), WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: PSEUDOFOSSILS, FACIES, TIDES AND SYNDEPOSITIONAL TECTONIC ACTIVITY IN A MESOPROTEROZOIC INTRACRATONIC BASIN A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Geological Sciences University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Roy Gregory Rule © Copyright Roy Gregory Rule, July, 2020. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Geological Sciences Geology Building University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada Or Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9, Canada i ABSTRACT Sedimentary, microbial and deformation features in the lower Belt Supergroup (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana
    Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana Compiled and Mapped by Zachary C. St. Jean and Deirdre R. Teeter Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 488 2004 This report has had preliminary reviews for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the EDMAP component of the National Cooperative Geological Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under Contract Number 01HQAG0157. Introduction This project was funded by the EDMAP program of the U. S. Geological Survey. Field studies, including geologic mapping and a gravity and magnetic survey, were conducted during the 2001 field season. These studies were undertaken to gain a better understanding of the geologic structure of the Ruby basin in the area of Ruby Dam in southwest Montana (Figures 1 and 2). Ruby Dam, which impounds Ruby Reservoir, lies within a seismically active region known as the Intermountain Seismic Belt. Delineation and detailed mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary sediments has helped to understand better the occurrence of Quaternary faulting in the basin. No new faults of Quaternary age were recognized within the field area. However, a fault that offsets Quaternary deposits was newly mapped by the authors in a gravel pit two miles north of the north map boundary. This fault may change previously calculated ground acceleration values at the dam site, and may indicate a greater susceptibility of the dam to seismic activity than previously thought. The geologic map in this report combines previous work that focused on the bedrock of the area with new mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary deposits by the present authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Around Southwest Montana
    AROUND SOUTHWEST MONTANA 2020 EDITION 2 • Road Trips in Southwest Montana | 2020 Now’s your chance to enjoy all southwest IN AND Montana has to o er here’s no question about it: It’s a different kind of summer in southwest Montana. AROUND The events we love, from the Montana Folk Festival and An Rí Rá to Shakespeare in the Park, are canceled. But that doesn’t mean Tthere’s not plenty to see and do. With far fewer visitors from outside the state expected and many ambitious vacation plans curtailed, this year we decided to use this opportunity to remind Montanans of the joys in our own back yard. There’s more to see and do than we could get to in a year of summers. And lots of places we’ve been, we Mountain ranges surround Butte on three sides. love so much we go back over and over — from the Big Look to the north to see the Anaconda Range, Hole National Battlefield to Virginia City to the World heading south are the Highlands, and on the eastside Museum of Mining in Butte. is a close-up view of the East Ridge. • But there is so We’ve got all that and more in this section — so many much more to see. things within easy driving distance that will produce lifelong memories. For those in-state travelers who like to avoid the Once the largest truck- the coronavirus. In order to crowd — this summer is your chance! operated open pit copper protect the community and We’ve also included some less-well-known gems that mine in the United States, the vendors, the market will could make a perfect stop on your southwest Montana the Berkeley Pit viewing be redesigned to foster social itinerary — places like Tizer Gardens near Boulder.
    [Show full text]
  • WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009
    WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose for this watershed plan is to: (1) Identify and document resource concerns within the watershed, both water and non- water related. (2) Prioritize those concerns (3) Outline objectives and methods of addressing those concerns (4) Provide guidance in the implementation of action plans and other associated watershed activities. This document will be maintained as a guide for watershed activities, and will be updated annually to reflect current circumstances in the watershed including reprioritization of concerns and addition of new areas of concentration. BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED COMMITTEE – MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Beaverhead Watershed Committee is to seek an understanding of the watershed – how it functions and supports the human communities dependent upon it – and to build agreement on watershed-related planning issues among stakeholders with diverse viewpoints. Goals: . Provide a mechanism and forum for landowners, citizens, and agencies to work together to: . Identify problems and concerns both riparian and non-riparian, urban and rural. Reach agreement upon the priority of and methods for addressing those concerns. Act as a conduit between local interests and agencies for purposes of procuring the funding and non-monetary assistance necessary to begin systematically addressing priority concerns. Foster a cooperative environment where conflict is avoided, and work to resolve conflict as necessary for the watershed effort to move forward. Stay abreast of opportunities, issues, and developments that could be either beneficial or detrimental to the watershed or segments of the watershed. Keep stakeholders appropriately informed. Objectives: . Continuous Improvement – Maintain a broad range of active improvement projects/programs relating to diverse attributes of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping
    *Updates to the orginal Ruby CMZ were made in 2017 as part of the Clear Creek CMZ. Final Report Please also see the Clear Creek CMZ Report and the Upper Missouri Headwaters CMZ Summary Report. November 30, 2010* Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping Karin Boyd, PG Applied Geomorphology, Inc. Prepared for: 211 N Grand Ave, Suite C Bozeman, MT 59715 Ruby Valley Conservation District 406‐587‐6352 P.O. Box 295 Sheridan, MT 59749 Tony Thatcher & Bryan Swindell DTM Consulting, Inc. 211 N Grand Ave, Suite J Bozeman, MT 59715 406‐585‐5322 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Channel Migration and Avulsion Processes ......................................................... 1 1.2 The Channel Migration Zone Mapping Concept ................................................. 7 1.3 Uncertainty ........................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Relative Levels of Risk ........................................................................................ 9 1.5 Potential Applications .......................................................................................... 9 1.6 Disclaimer and Limitations ................................................................................ 10 1.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 10 2.0 Physical Setting ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS of MINES and PROSPECTS in the DILLON Lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO and MONTANA
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE DILLON lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO AND MONTANA By JeffreyS. Loen and Robert C. Pearson Pamphlet to accompany Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1803-C Table !.--Recorded and estimated production of base and precious metals in mining districts and areas in the Dillon 1°x2° guadrangle, Idaho and Montana [Production of other commodities are listed in footnotes. All monetary values are given in dollars at time of production. Dashes indicate no information available. Numbers in parentheses are estimates by the authors or by those cited as sources of data in list that follows table 2. <,less than; s.t., short tons] District/area Years Ore Gold Silver Copper Lead Zinc Value Sources name (s. t.) (oz) (oz) (lb) (lb) (lb) (dollars) of data Idaho Carmen Creek 18 70's-190 1 (50,000) 141, 226 district 1902-1980 (unknown) Total (50,000) Eldorado 1870's-1911 17,500 (350 ,000) 123, 226 district 1912-1954 (13,000) (8,000) (300,000) Total (650,000) Eureka district 1880's-1956 (13 ,500) 12,366 (2,680,000) 57,994 (4,000) ( 4,000 ,000) 173 Total (4,000,000) Gibbonsville 1877-1893 (unknown) district 1894-1907 (83,500) (1,670,000) 123, 226 1908-1980 ( <10 ,000) 123 Total (2,000,000) Kirtley Creek 1870's-1890 2,000 40,500 173 district 1890's-1909 (<10,000) 1910-1918 24,300 (500 ,000) 123 1919-1931 (unknown) 1932-1947 2,146 (75 ,000) 173 Total (620,000) McDevitt district 1800's.-1980 (80,000) Total (80,000) North Fork area 1800's-1980 (unknown) Total ( <10 ,000) Pratt Creek 1870's-1900 (50 ,000) district Total (50,000) Sandy Creek 1800 's-1900 (unknown) district 1901-1954 19,613 4,055 4,433 71,359 166,179 (310,000) 17 3, 200 Total (310 ,000) Montana Anaconda Range 1880's-1980 (<100,000) area Total (<100,000) Argenta district 1864-1901 (1 ,500 ,000) 1902-1965 311,796 72,241 562,159 604,135 18,189,939 2,009,366 5,522,962 88 Total (7,000,000) Baldy Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA N7 4Qea
    E 12, p( /F- o77 (r 2) Sf(jji PGJ/F-077(82) National Uranium Resource Evaluation 6 BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE 41 MONTANA n7 4QeA/ University of Montana Missoula, Montana and Montana State University Bozeman, Montana E2T oFi Issue Date August 1982 SATESO9 PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Grand Junction Area Office, Colorado rmetadc957781 Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is a result of work performed by the University of Montana and Montana State University, through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE was a program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. Available from: Technical Library Bendix Field Engineering Corporation P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archean Geology of Montana
    THE ARCHEAN GEOLOGY OF MONTANA David W. Mogk,1 Paul A. Mueller,2 and Darrell J. Henry3 1Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ABSTRACT in a subduction tectonic setting. Jackson (2005) char- acterized cratons as areas of thick, stable continental The Archean rocks in the northern Wyoming crust that have experienced little deformation over Province of Montana provide fundamental evidence long (Ga) periods of time. In the Wyoming Province, related to the evolution of the early Earth. This exten- the process of cratonization included the establishment sive record provides insight into some of the major, of a thick tectosphere (subcontinental mantle litho- unanswered questions of Earth history and Earth-sys- sphere). The thick, stable crust–lithosphere system tem processes: Crustal genesis—when and how did permitted deposition of mature, passive-margin-type the continental crust separate from the mantle? Crustal sediments immediately prior to and during a period of evolution—to what extent are Earth materials cycled tectonic quiescence from 3.1 to 2.9 Ga. These compo- from mantle to crust and back again? Continental sitionally mature sediments, together with subordinate growth—how do continents grow, vertically through mafi c rocks that could have been basaltic fl ows, char- magmatic accretion of plutons and volcanic rocks, acterize this period. A second major magmatic event laterally through tectonic accretion of crustal blocks generated the Beartooth–Bighorn magmatic zone assembled at continental margins, or both? Structural at ~2.9–2.8 Ga.
    [Show full text]