Ilford to Barking Riverside Consultation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ilford to Barking Riverside Consultation Report 1 Appendix B Summaries of stakeholder responses 2 Code Frames 4 2 Summaries of stakeholder responses This section summarises each of the responses we received from respondents whom we would consider to be ‘stakeholders’. These summaries are included only in order to assist readers of this report to understand in broad terms what issues stakeholders raised with us. The original, verbatim response from each stakeholder were analysed to identify the issues raised. We identified as a ‘stakeholder’ all those respondents we judged are notable and reasonably well known amongst the public. This includes London’s local authorities, major transport groups, local neighbourhood or residents associations, major charities, businesses and business groups and industry associations. Barking Riverside Ltd Broadly supported the proposals, citing perceived benefits for pedestrians and cyclists accessing the Barking Riverside development. Asked to be kept updated throughout the scheme development process. London Borough of Redbridge (Air Quality response) ‘Welcomed the proposals from an air quality perspective’, highlighting high levels of car ownership in the Borough. Added that respondents to a Redbridge consultation suggested they would walk and cycle more with improved infrastructure. Metropolitan Police Raised ‘no objections’ and ‘no observations’ and requested sight of preliminary designs if/when they become available. River Roding Trust Ltd Supported the proposals and requested that the path along the River Roding between Ilford and Barking be re-opened. RNIB Provided views on a range of issues affecting blind or partially sighted people, including the design of consultation materials, rights of way matters, streetscape design and the risks of ‘shared use’ footways. Provided no specific views on the proposals themselves. STIBASA (Sustainable Transport In Barking And Surrounding Areas) Commented that the proposals were ‘sensible and achievable’. Provided additional detailed comments about the proposals, including suggestions for routeing diversions at St Awdry’s Road and Sutton Gardens. 3 Sustrans Supported the proposed route but highlighted some concerns over various aspects of the scheme designs, with suggestions for how these might be mitigated. Sustrans’ comments were concerned with each section of the proposed route, but they also included suggestions for additional improvements they felt should be made. They also suggested a number of improvements in areas not directly within the proposed route alignment, but which they felt should be improved for pedestrians and pedestrians and cyclists nonetheless. 4 Code frames It would help us if you could use the space below to explain your answers to the question above. If you are commenting on a particular location, please mention it to help us analyse the responses. Code Count % Environment Would improve air quality 1 0.47% General/in- Support for unspecified reasons 18 8.49% principle Opposition for unspecified reasons 5 2.36% comments The proposals are a waste of money 11 5.19% Infrastructure The route of the proposed cycle way is not 2 0.94% sufficiently direct/too windy Provide cycle hire docking stations at Barking and 1 0.47% Ilford stations Replace the continuous crossings at side roads 1 0.47% with zebra crossings Provide more cycle parking at Barking station 1 0.47% Incorporate space nearby the cycle way for 1 0.47% activities to promote cycling/walking (eg. play area) Build a footpath & cycle way along the west bank 1 0.47% of the River Roding Support for the development of a cycle way from 1 0.47% Ilford - Barking station Address the issues at the Blake Avenue - 1 0.47% Sparsholt Road bridge Build a cycle way from Upney station - Barking 1 0.47% Riverside Repair/refurbish the footbridge connecting Tanner 2 0.94% Street and North Street Repair/refurbish the bridge connecting Harts Lane 1 0.47% to Hertford Road Provide continuous crossings at Wedderburn 1 0.47% road/Cranbourne road Divert the cycle way underneath the St Awdrys 1 0.47% Road/Eldred Rd/Wedderburn Rd bridge Divert the cycle way via Sutton Road/Feltham 1 0.47% Road/Saxham Road Ensure the cycle way is maintained to a high 1 0.47% standard Introduce an additional wheeling ramp on the 1 0.47% other side of the steps at Station Parade Incorporate traffic calming measures in the 2 0.94% proposals Objection to continuous footways (must include 1 0.47% detectable boundaries) Incorporate pedestrian crossing facilities where 1 0.47% 5 bus stop bypasses are proposed All use of tactile paving must be to established 1 0.47% guidelines Re-open the riverside path along the River Roding 1 0.47% between Barking and Ilford Introduce the Lea-Lee-Epping cycle circular route 1 0.47% Provide a raised continuous crossing at 1 0.47% Endeavour Way/Bastable Avenue with a reduced turning radii Provide cycle parking at Endeavour Way/Bastable 1 0.47% Avenue Provide a contraflow cycle lane on Eldred Road or 1 0.47% Wedderburn Road Provide a turning island at St Awdrys 1 0.47% Road/Wedderburn Road Replace one traffic lane at Ripple Road (east of 1 0.47% Axe Street) with a cycle lane Provide a bi-directional, segregated cycle track on 1 0.47% Wakering Road Provide a shared-use foot/cycle way on Thames 1 0.47% Road Provide continuous footways at the Thames Road 1 0.47% junctions Provide a segreated cycle lane on Sunningdale 1 0.47% Avenue Miscellaneous Decisions have already been made/consultation 1 0.47% has no purpose Unrelated comments 4 1.89% Criticisms of TfL/the Mayor of London 1 0.47% Introduce a car sharing scheme and lobby for tax 1 0.47% incentives for users of it Concern the scheme would lead to an increase in 1 0.47% Council Tax Comments about Sustrans Greenway proposals 2 0.94% The proposals would be beneficial only if properly 1 0.47% promoted Comments about the consultation materials 1 0.47% Accelerate feasibility work to improve Renwick 1 0.47% Road for walking/cycling Put the A13 into a tunnel 0.00% Negative Would not reduce personal journeys by private 5 2.36% impacts on transport road users Would not encourage cycling/lead to fewer cyclists 2 0.94% Positive Would encourage more cycling/more people to 19 8.96% impacts on cycle road users Would encourage more walking/more people to 10 4.72% walk Would have no effect on public transport journeys 1 0.47% 6 Would reduce personal journeys by private 7 3.30% transport Road space Cycling infrastructure is unused outside peak 1 0.47% times Cycling infrastructure causes congestion/delays 9 4.25% by reducing road space for motorised vehicles Reduce pedestrian crossing times to 1 0.47% favour/provide more time for motorised vehicles Cycling infrastructure worsens air quality (by 4 1.89% creating delays for motorised vehicles) Segregate cycle ways from footway/objection to 6 2.83% shared space Segregate cycle lanes from traffic 4 1.89% Widen the footway/provide more space for 1 0.47% pedestrians Safe routes already exist for safe cycling between 1 0.47% Ilford and Barking Objection to loss of car parking spaces on 1 0.47% Wakering Road Take enforcement action illegal parking 1 0.47% Close side roads to rat running 1 0.47% Remove the roundabout north of Sutton Gardens 1 0.47% Prohibit parking on Sunningdale Avenue 1 0.47% Safety & Concerns about anti-social cyclists/cycling 3 1.42% security Concerns about anti-social behaviour at Mayes 2 0.94% Brook underpass Safety concerns about the bus/delivery only 1 0.47% section in Barking centre Potential for confrontation at the shared section on 1 0.47% Sunningdale Avenue Concerns about the potential for anti-social 1 0.47% behaviour along the route Invest in PCSO presence along the route 1 0.47% TOTAL 167 78.77% 7 Please let us know if the proposals would have a positive or negative impact on you or the journeys you make. Please explain how we could minimise any negative impacts. Please also let us know if you have feedback about the specific effects our proposals might have on particular junctions or areas. Theme Code Q3 % Environment Would improve air quality 1 0.47% General/in- Support for unspecified reasons 4 1.89% principle Opposition for unspecified reasons 3 1.42% comments Improve lighting along the route 2 0.94% Provide CCTV along the route 1 0.47% Provide a pedestrian crossing on Longbridge Road 1 0.47% Provide traffic calming on Longbridge Road 1 0.47% Extend the cycle way via Renwick Road towards 1 0.47% Castle Green Build a footpath & cycle way along the west bank of 1 0.47% the River Roding Unrelated comments 1 0.47% Put the A13 into a tunnel 1 0.47% Would not encourage cycling/lead to fewer cyclists 1 0.47% Positive Would encourage more cycling/more people to cycle 18 8.49% impacts on Would encourage more walking/more people to walk 1 0.47% road users Would reduce personal journeys by private transport 2 0.94% Road space Cycling infrastructure is unused outside peak times 0.00% Cycling infrastructure causes congestion/delays by 5 2.36% reducing road space for motorised vehicles Safety & Concerns about anti-social cyclists/cycling 1 0.47% security TOTAL 45 21.23% .
Recommended publications
  • At Barking Riverside
    PARKLANDS 1–3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS 3–4 BEDROOM HOUSES BARKING RIVERSIDE WILL DELIVER 10,800 HOMES AND 65,000 SQ. M. OF COMMERCIAL SPACE OVER 178 HECTARES Computer generated image. BARKINGRIVERSIDE.LONDON #AGIANTLEAPFORLONDON 1 2KM OF SOUTH-FACING RIVER THAMES FRONTAGE Computer generated image. 2 BARKINGRIVERSIDE.LONDON #AGIANTLEAPFORLONDON 3 WELCOME TO PARKLANDS AT BARKING RIVERSIDE. A brand new neighbourhood for Parklands, the first phase of new London, Barking Riverside is a vibrant homes to launch on site with L&Q, COME HOME new district, sitting alongside 2km of is a collection of one to four bedroom majestic River Thames frontage. contemporary houses and apartments. Once completed, the pioneering Each home will bring together a perfect TO A BRAND NEW development will offer 10,800 new blend of comfort, architecture, design homes, alongside shops, restaurants and impeccable eco-credentials, where and leisure and sports facilities. There you can live the life you want to live, will be public parks and river walkways, and live it in style. ADVENTURE excellent new schools with state-of- the-art facilities, and a new London Overground station, all in close proximity of central London. 4 BARKINGRIVERSIDE.LONDON #AGIANTLEAPFORLONDON 5 A VIBRANT COMMUNITY Be part of a brand new, thriving community at Barking Riverside. Set to be one of the most dynamic new destinations in the capital, once completed, Barking Riverside’s District Centre will include an impressive 65,000 square metres of commercial floorspace – home to shopping outlets, restaurants, bars and cafés. A growing number of businesses are already making their mark on the East London development.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Report 2020
    PROJECT REPORT 2020 REGISTERED CHARITY: 1189743 www.twcp.org.uk Contents Local context 4 TWCP is a resident-led Mission statement 7 project in one of the Timeline 10 TWCP in numbers 16 most deprived areas TWCP 20 achievements for 2020 18 in the country. UEL evaluation interim report 20 Interim Report Concluding Statement 22 Interim Report Analysis of results 23 This report document Final Report 26 Interview person 1 27 tells its story going Interview person 2 28 forward… Interview person 3 29 Interview person 4 30 Interview Analysis 32 Covid-19 response 36 Trustees, steering group & staff 37 Appendix 1 (interview questions) 38 2 TWCP PROJECT REPORT 2020 | CONTENTS 3 Local Context Thames Ward is the site of one of the THAMES WARD largest housing developments in Europe. Thames Ward Area Its population has doubled in recent years LONDON and will will continue to increase thereafter. Yet poverty levels are high with half of the children in the ward living in poverty. Thames Ward Community Project (TWCP) was a response to CASTLE GREEN SCRATTONS FARM ORION PARK this upheaval and the very real divisions (physical, economic and social) that may be exacerbated without a community-led response that brings people together across the entire area. THAMES VIEW TWCP has been funded by the Big Lottery for three years (2017- 2020) to enable positive community-led change across the whole of Thames Ward. The funding focuses on four themes: cohesion, health, employability and the environment. The project is hosted by Riverside School which employs two full time staff, a Director of Community Engagement (Matt Scott: start date October 2017) and a Community Organiser (Jamie Kesten: start date November 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Barking Riverside Extension – Factsheet 1 Project Overview
    Barking Riverside Extension – factsheet 1 Project overview Introduction Barking Riverside is the largest housing development in east London, with planning permission for up to 10,800 new homes, as well as healthcare, shopping, community and leisure facilities. However, the London Riverside Opportunity Area Planning Framework (OAPF), a spatial planning document covering this area including Barking Riverside1, identifies that a package of transport measures are required to facilitate the development of Barking Riverside, and the wider London Riverside Opportunity Area. The Barking Riverside Extension, a 4km extension (1.5km of new track) of the existing London Overground Gospel Oak to Barking line, is the primary component of a package of transport measures to unlock development at Barking Riverside. Without a new operational rail link in place, the development potential of the Barking Riverside site cannot not be fully realised, as no more than 4,000 homes can be occupied. This project aims to deliver the Barking Riverside Extension of the London Overground Gospel Oak to Barking line. The project will be complemented by a series of transport improvements measures led by Barking Riverside Limited and Transport for London, including bus network enhancements and the creation of a street network that promotes walking and cycling. Further information about the London Riverside Opportunity Area and the Barking Riverside development proposals, is presented in Barking Riverside Extension factsheet 3. The Barking Riverside Extension is proposed to be funded and financed by a variety of sources, including through money allocated in the TfL Business Plan and contributions from the developers of the Barking Riverside site.
    [Show full text]
  • A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration the Tunnel Is Essential to East London and Thames Gateway’S Economic Success the A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration
    The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration The tunnel is essential to East London and Thames Gateway’s economic success The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration Thank you for taking the trouble to find out more about the proposed A13 Riverside Tunnel. The tunnelling of a 1.3km stretch of the A13 will not only improve traffic flow along this key route, mitigating the two notorious bottlenecks at the Lodge Avenue and Renwick Road junctions, but will also transform a severely blighted area. As well as creating a new neighbourhood of over 5,000 homes called Castle Green, the tunnel will act as a catalyst for the building of another 28,300 homes in London Riverside, while creating over 1,200 jobs and unlocking significant business and commercial growth in the surrounding area. The tunnel is essential to east London and the Thames Gateway’s economic success and will stimulate growth along its route as well as easing congestion. It also signifies a new way of working in this country adapted from successful models from other European cities. A large proportion of the scheme could be self-financing, with the majority of the funding being generated by the tunnel itself, through the land value uplift and sale of the homes, the community infrastructure levy and new homes bonus. If the government also supports our proposal for stamp duty devolution in Castle Green, then this would mean further significant funding for the scheme could be secured. Cllr Darren Rodwell Cllr Roger Ramsey Leader of Barking and Dagenham Council Leader of Havering Council Road to Regeneration 03 About the A13 The A13 is one of the busiest arterial routes into the capital, connecting the county of Essex with central London.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking and Dagenham Report 2021 Barking and Dagenham Report 2021
    Housing supply analysis Connectivity Development pipeline Focus on: Barking and knightfrank.com/research Dagenham Research 2021 BARKING AND DAGENHAM REPORT 2021 BARKING AND DAGENHAM REPORT 2021 50% below asking prices 1km around Average disposable income is expected developments coming forward including Poplar Station. to rise 51% over the next decade. Growth at urban village Abbey Quay which is WHAT DOES THE NEXT On the rental side, a similar story in GVA, a measure of goods and services adjacent to Barking town centre by the emerges with average asking rents produced in an area, is expected to climb River Roding, and as part of the 440-acre DECADE LOOK LIKE FOR for a two-bedroom flat in the vicinity around a fifth. Barking Riverside masterplan. of Barking Station currently £1,261 BARKING & DAGENHAM? per month and £975 per month for Buyer preferences Dagenham Dock. This is 10% lower than The pandemic has encouraged Fig 3. Housing delivery test: asking rents around Limehouse Station, homebuyers to seek more space both Barking & Dagenham inside and out, while the experience of 2,500 uu the past year has, for some individuals, The level of new highlighted the importance of having 2,000 Faster transport connections and a growing local economy are development in Barking better access to riverside locations or supporting extensive regeneration in the area. & Dagenham has not kept green space. 1,500 pace with housing need Our latest residential client survey confirmed this, with 66% of respondents 1,000 uu Freeport status and new film studios More homes are planned, with around over that same period and a 3% rise in now viewing having access to a garden Annual Housing Target combined with the imminent arrival of 13,500 units in the development pipeline, nearby Tower Hamlets, which includes or outdoor space as a higher priority 500 historic City of London markets, Crossrail according to Molior, whichwill be delivered Canary Wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking Riverside: 1 Heritage and Ecology Combine to Create a Distinctive New Place
    Barking Riverside: 1 Heritage and ecology combine to create a distinctive new place LDA Design is helping to turn Barking Power Station in east London 2 3 into a distinctive new riverfront town, made special by its heritage, ecology and location. Stretching 2km along the northern banks of the River Thames, this ambitious new 180-hectare development is one of the UK’s largest regeneration projects. It will provide more than 10,000 homes, as well as new schools, and commercial and cultural spaces. LDA Design, in partnership with WSP, is delivering a Strategic Infrastructure Scheme (SIS), providing a framework for Barking Riverside’s parks, public realm and green spaces; its highways and streetscapes, flood defences, services, utilities and drainage. Starting with a clear vision based on extensive public consultation, our ‘First life’ approach aims to create a welcoming place where people belong. Client Barking Riverside Ltd. Services Masterplanning, Landscape Architecture Location Critical to its success is excellent connectivity. A new train station Barking, Barking & Dagenham and additional bus routes and cycle network will help to integrate Area Partners 180 ha Barking Riverside with its surroundings. The landscape strategy is key L&Q, WSP, Barton Willmore, Arcadis, Laing O’Rourke, Schedule to creating a safe, sociable, sustainable place to live. Proposals include Liftschutz Davidson Sandilands, DF Clark, Future City, 2016 - ongoing Temple, Jestico + Whiles, Tim O’Hare Associates, Envac, terraced seating with river views and a new park that moves into IESIS, XCo2 1 Barking Park 3D masterplan serene wetlands. New habitats will help boost biodiversity. 2 Community green 3 Terraced seating overlooking swales 1 1 Eastern Waterfront, looking west.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Ilfordbuses from Ilford
    Buses from Ilford Buses from Ilford 462 167 150 N86 123 continues to continues to continues to Chigwell Row continues to continues to Limes Farm Estate Loughton Harold Hill Wood Green 179 Tottenham Chingford Hainault Chigwell Hainault Harold Hill Police Station The Lowe Rise The Lowe Dagnam Park Drive 296 Tottenham Chingford Elmbridge Chigwell Hainault Romford Harold Hill Hale Green Road Fire Station Hilldene Avenue 364 Blackhorse Whitehall Forest Road Hainault Hainault Romford Rainham Straight Road Road Road for Fairlop Waters Road for Liberty Shopping Centre Road South Boulder Park Ballards Road Walthamstow Woodford Fairlop Fencepiece Road New North Romford Dagenham Gallows Bell Wells Murtwell Drive Road Bus Garage East Corner Hail & Ride section Forest Road Woodford Fullwell Cross Fencepiece Road Eastern Avenue Reede Road Gidea Park Wood Street Green for Leisure Centre New North Road West Main Road 128 169 86 Waterwork’s South Barkingside Claybury Fencepiece Road Rose Lane Estate Clayhall Parsloes Romford Corner Woodford High Street Broadway for Redbridge for Hurstleigh Avenue Sports Centre Gardens Hail & 396 Charlie Brown’s Ride Longwood Clayhall Fullwell Cross King George Billet Road Fullwell Avenue Becontree Romford Roundabout section Gardens Avenue for Leisure Centre Hospital Martins Corner for Liberty Shopping Centre 145 366 Leytonstone Redbridge Barkingside High Street Newbury Park Fullwell Cross Bennett’s Romford Stadium Roding for Leisure Centre Castle Lane Lane South Hail & Green Man Ride Redbridge Woodford Avenue Cranbrook
    [Show full text]
  • Ilford to Barking Riverside Consultation Report
    1 Appendix A Questionnaire 2 Letter to residents and businesses 7 Letter distribution area 9 Consultation leaflet 10 Email to people who use public transport 12 or who cycle in the area affected by our proposals Email to stakeholder organisations 13 List of stakeholder organisations we 15 contacted Press Release 20 2 PLEASE RETURN TO FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS 1a. Thinking about our proposals as a whole, what effect do you think they will have on the way people choose to travel? A limited Many number more of extra I am unsure The Fewer people people people what effect proposals would choose would would the would have to travel in choose to choose proposals no effect this way travel in to travel might have this way in this way Walking Cycling Using public transport Using motor vehicles for personal journeys Using motor vehicles for business journeys It would help us if you could use the space below to explain your answers to the question above. If you are commenting on a particular neighbourhood or junction, please mention it to help us analyse the responses: 1b, We would like to know which sections/neighbourhoods your views relate to? Or are you commenting on the entire route? If you wish to comment on more than one section (but not the entire route) then you may find it easier to write to us at [email protected] or Freepost TfL Consultations A Bastable Avenue & Sutton Gardens B St Awdrys Road & Eldred Road C Wakering Road & Sunningdale Avenue D Mayes Brook Bridge 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Barking
    Barking Station – Zone 4 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map 1 Buses from Barking 74 400 LAVENDER PLACE FORSYTHIA CLOSE 2 56 Uphall School 5 BANKSIDE ROAD Playing Field 397 WISTERIA CLOSE 1 SOUTHBOURNE GARDENS 22 54 4 3 Y R O A D 2 55 Loxford 4 HARVE 37 Hall 70 LOXFORD LANE 16 24 Barking Abbey 36 The Lake Comprehensive School 23 B MEDWAY CLOSE U 169 1 T 415 T 1 FAN 1 S Other buses from Barking 12 SB Clayhall ROAD B 64 LAVENDER PLACE N U AZALEA CLOSE 11 EB R 1 3 NORMA SH for Hurstleigh Gardens 32 R Y 2 ST. LEONARDS GARDENS r 1 e RTHE Schoolday services: R t Barking Park ING NO RN R O RK E A PITTMAN GDNS a L A A JASMINE CLOSE 86 IEF WE N Loxford D W B D A N E R O A D R 48 W O Q Polyclinic rd A 687 towards Dagenham Park School o D A 13 f D x A VE Lo A WB O K 16 Barking Park R 44 24 1 F E UPHALL ROAD E R Fullwell Avenue S A X O N R O A D Tennis Courts I I 11 N 14 72 L E N G 10 S 15 E N 34 ROAD TULI D R O 18 I R D G A P G A R D E N S A S H L L M A I A H O R C G T 54 N A R T.
    [Show full text]
  • Barking Riverside Ltd – Continuation of Support and Statutory Accounts
    REQUEST FOR MAYORAL DECISION – MD1520 Title: Barking Riverside Ltd – Continuation of support and statutory accounts Executive Summary: The statutory accounts for year ending July 2014 are to be filed for Barking Riverside Limited – a joint venture company of which GLA Land and Property Limited is a shareholder along with Bellway Homes Limited. In order to complete the accounts, the company’s auditors, KPMG, require each shareholder to confirm that it will continue to support the company including not seeking repayment of finance provided to the company during the twelve months following submission of the accounts. Confirmation is to be provided in the form of two letters to be sent by GLA Land and Property Limited to the Directors of Barking Riverside Limited. Decision: That the Mayor approves GLA Land and Property Limited’s continued provision of support to Barking Riverside Limited in the form described in this paper for the period up to 31 July 2016. Mayor of London I confirm that I do not have any disclosable pecuniary interests in the proposed decision, and take the decision in compliance with the Code of Conduct for elected Members of the Authority. The above request has my approval. Signature: Date: 1 PART I - NON-CONFIDENTIAL FACTS AND ADVICE TO THE MAYOR Decision required – supporting report 1. Introduction and background 1.1. Barking Riverside Limited (BRL) is a joint venture (JV) between the GLA and Bellway Homes Limited, each owning 49% and 51% of the shares respectively. The GLA’s interest is held by GLA Land and Property Limited (GLAP). 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • London Overground Extension to Barking Riverside
    London Overground extension to Barking Riverside Spring 2015 public consultation report London Overground extension to Barking Riverside Spring 2015 public consultation report Published September 2015 2 Contents 1 Executive Summary........................................................................................................ 4 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8 3 Background to the scheme ........................................................................................... 10 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 11 5 Overview of consultation responses ............................................................................. 14 6 Analysis of consultation responses .............................................................................. 16 7 Responses from stakeholders ...................................................................................... 29 8 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 35 9 Next steps .................................................................................................................... 35 Appendix A1 – Comments raised for Question 9 ................................................................ 36 Appendix A2 – Comments raised for Question 10 .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Riverside Opportunity Area Planning Framework
    LONDON RIVERSIDE OPPORTUNITY AREA PLANNING FRAMEWORK ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 2015 Copyright Acknowledgements Greater London Authority September 2015 Greater London Authority Colin Wilson Published by Darren Richards Greater London Authority Yogesh Patil City Hall Natalie Gentry The Queen’s Walk Martin Scholar More London Tava Walton London SE1 2AA Matt Christie Louise Johnson Contact Levent Kerimol Enquiries 020 7983 4100 Minicom 020 7983 4458 Transport for London Website Alex Williams www.london.gov.uk Bobbie Bailey Julia Bray Cover photo: Edward Rhys-Thomas Barking Riverside Ltd. Maeve Clements Marcus Adams Barking and Dagenham Council Jeremy Grint Rachel Hogger Naomi Pomfret Daniel Pope Havering Council Christopher Barter Martyn Thomas Tom Dobrashian Andrew Blake-Herbert Environment Agency Jenny Schofield Barking Riverside Ltd Matthew Carpen With thanks also to John Allen who commissioned the first draft on behalf of the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation (LTGDC). Far more people than it is possible to thank individually have contributed to the production of this framework. They include major landowners and their planning, transport and design teams; local residents and businesses; officers at the Greater London Authority, Design for London, Transport for London, and the local Councils. Without whom, neither the framework nor the progress that has already been made towards its implementation would have been possible. LONDON RIVERSIDE OPPORTUNITY AREA PLANNING FRAMEWORK Adopted September 2015 Well! These are tales of mystery! And many a darkly woven lie With men will easy credence gain; Wile truth, calm truth, may speak in vain, For eloquence, whose honey’d sway, Our mortal wits obey, Can honour give to actions ill, And faith to deeds incredible; And bitter blame, and praises high, Fall truest from posterity.
    [Show full text]