DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Auden Group”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Subject: ENGLISH Class: B.A. Part 1 English Hons., Paper-1, Group B Topic: THE AUDEN GROUP Lecture No: 20 By: Prof. Sunita Sinha Head, Department of English Women’s College Samastipur L.N.M.U., Darbhanga Email: [email protected] Website: www.sunitasinha.com Mob No: 9934917117 “THE AUDEN GROUP” INTRODUCTION • The Auden Group or the Auden Generation is a group of British and Irish writers active in the 1930s that included W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender, Cecil Day Lewis, Louis MacNeice and Christopher Isherwood. • The Auden Group is also sometimes referred to as the Nineteen Thirties Poets or The Oxford Poets who represented a new, more experimental literary style. • All the poets knew one another, and most had been educated at either Oxford or Cambridge, all sharing vaguely left-wing viewpoints. The writers associated with the grouping—W. H. Auden, Louis MacNeice, Cecil Day- 2 Lewis, Stephen Spender, Christopher Isherwood never gathered together in the same room, nor shared any coherent poetic or literary values. • Rather, the poets connected individually, particularly through Auden, who collaborated several times with both Isherwood and MacNeice, and wrote with Day-Lewis an introduction to the annual Oxford Poetry. • In the public mind, the individuals continued to be linked, with poet Roy Campbell referring to “MacSpaunday” in his 1946 work, Talking Bronco, a word created from the names of MacNeice (Mac), Spender (sp), Auden (au- n), and Day-Lewis (day). • The English Poetry of 1930s is primarily recognized as the poetry of leftist philosophy. The poets during this period were highly influenced by the philosophy of Karl Marx and his followers. The leftist movement started during this period was pioneered by W.H. Auden. • The poets, like W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender, Cecil Day Lewis, Louis MacNeice and Christopher Isherwood are known as social poets belonging to the Auden group. All these poets were sensitively alive to contemporary social and political problems and. their poetry reflects their awareness of the world lying around them. • The poetic concept of these poets was shaped by their acute awareness of the social reality which enabled them to plunge into hectic political activities. All these poets were deeply influenced by the contemporary happenings like the Spanish Civil War, The First World War, the economic depression of 1929, mass starvation, unemployment, the General strike in Britain in 1926, the powers of Fascist and Nazi dictators and the Second World War. These poets started to react to the social, political and economic conditions of their time. • They reflected the mood of the times in their poetry. Among these social poets, Auden, Spender and Lewis are recognized as major social poets of 1930s. 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POETRY OF THE AUDEN GROUP • They wrote poems which were a clear reaction against the reigning stylishly esoteric poetry. • They also made natural use of imagery taken from contemporary life and propagated some sort of personally interpreted ideal of Communism for remedying the ills of man’s life. • The poetry of Oxford poets is intellectual and unemotional. • These poets took interest in political and economic affairs. They thought that Marxism was the only source to end all the evils of the man's life. • They abominated bourgeois society. • They affirmed their faith in revolution. According to them revolution would bring about a new order and new values. The new world order would be communistic. The Oxford poets also show the influence of Freud. • Their poetical technique was greatly influenced by Imagism, French, Symbolisms and Hopkins-Eliot innovations. 4 IMPORTANT POETS OF THE AUDEN GROUP W.H. AUDEN [1907-1973] • Wystan Hugh Auden is considered one of the finest poets of the twentieth century, occupying a position among the likes of T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound. He was remarkably prolific and experimental in his poetry; his early stage was characterized by an Eliot-like modernism, his middle stage incorporated Marxist and Freudian themes, and his late stage was more conversational and dealt with Christianity. • Auden was the chief spokesman of the “Oxford Coterie” of young poets that included Stephen Spenders, Louis MacNeice and Cecil Day Lewis. W.H. Auden together with these poets catalyzed the process of introducing themes that are now archetypal to the modernist poetry of the 20th century. Auden’s poems deal with the social and political problems and also the problems of identity, reclamation of space, and the herculean difficulties associated with war-affected nations. • At Oxford in the late 1920s, Auden read the work of Eliot and was inspired majorly by the latter. Auden’s earliest verse was also influenced by Thomas Hardy and Wilfred Owens. His poems are fragmented, hinging on substantial images and colloquial concerns to convey Auden’s political and psychological fears. • He experimented with a variety of forms: lyric poetry, odes, ballads, meditations, arguments, satires, conversations, and more. He used both formal and free verse. Auden won the National Medal for literature in 1967, with the award explaining that Auden’s poetry “has illuminated our lives and times with grace, wit and vitality. His work, branded by the moral and ideological fires of our age, breathes with eloquence, perception and intellectual power.” 5 • Auden's literary career is divided into two phases. In the first phase he published poems and the Orators. At this stage he was influenced by both Marx and Freud. Thus, his early poetry shows a strange fusion of Freudian and Marxist views. He found the solution of all social and political ills in left wing political ideologies. The main theme of his early poems is social criticism and protest. • The second phase of his poetry began in 1939. His later poetry consists of The Shield Achilles, Homage to Clio, and About the House. This second phase shows a change in Auden interests. The poetry of this phase reflects his deep understanding of life and its problems. After sometime Auden gave up communism. Consequently, his poetry took a religious and metaphysical turn. STEPHEN SPENDER [1909-1995] • Poet and critic, Stephen Spender was a member of the generation of British poets who came to prominence in the 1930s, a group—sometimes referred to as the Oxford Poets—that included W.H. Auden, Christopher Isherwood, C. Day Lewis, and Louis MacNeice. • In the beginning he too was attracted by left wing politics. Apart from politics his poetry shows deep empathy with essential human condition. Perhaps this is what makes Spender more relevant as a poet. • His important works are - poems, Dolphins, Collected Poems, The Generous Days, Poems of Dedication, Vienna, The Still Centre, Ruins and Visions, World Within A World. He also composed some highly moving poems on war. His poetry is a beautiful combination of his political commitment with his own personal feeling and emotions. • He was an accomplished poetic artist who used exact words. Above all, his poems expressed a self-critical, compassionate personality. In the following decades Spender, in some ways a more personal poet than his early associates, 6 became increasingly more autobiographical, turning his gaze from the external topical situation to the subjective experience. CECIL DAY LEWIS [1904-1972] • Cecil Day Lewis was a brilliant critic, a great translator and fine story writer. However, he is remembered chiefly as a gifted poet. In his youth and during the disruption and suffering of the Great Depression, Day-Lewis adopted communist views, becoming a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain from 1935 to 1938. • His early poetry was marked by didacticism and a preoccupation with social themes. In his later poetry he turned to personal and pastoral themes. His important works are - From Feathers to Iron, The Magnetic Mountain and A Time for Dance. • His stinging reproach to the gray, gritty present and his great faith in the possibility of a new social order, as well as the qualities revealed in his earlier writing, are in evidence throughout this work. LOUIS MACNEICE [1907-1963] • Louis MacNeice was widely regarded in the 1930s as a junior member of the Auden-Spender-Day Lewis group: MacNeice and Stephen Spender were contemporaries and friends at Oxford, serving as joint editors of Oxford Poetry, 1929. • MacNeice became a friend of W.H. Auden’s and collaborated with him on Letters from Iceland (1937). In Modern Poetry (1938), MacNeice provided the best critical statement of the poetic aims and achievements of his friends. Despite these personal and professional ties, MacNeice did not share the ideological commitments of the “Auden group.” 7 • From first to last, his own work reflects a melancholy skepticism too honest to give final assent to any fixed system. MacNeice remained a detached outsider. • His works include - The Earth Compels, Plant and Phantom, Eighty-Five Poems and The Burning Perch. This poet did not embrace any political ideology like other Oxford poets. His opinions about communism were fluctuating. His poetry expresses the anguish of the age of machine. In short, he was a great and gifted poetic artist. CHRISTOPHER ISHERWOOD [1904-1986] • Christopher Isherwood of the 1930's was a legendary figure, in his own right as the author of “The Last of Mr. Norris” and “Goodbye to Berlin”. He was one of those gifted, leftward‐leaning young English writers of the decade like W. H. Auden, Stephen Spender, C. Day Lewis, and Louis MacNeice. • These poets influenced a generation as much by their politics as by their poetry, and entered history collectively as “Auden & Co.,” a Marxified successor group to Bloomsbury. CONCLUSION • Thus, the contribution of the Oxford poets is memorable. They changed the current of poetry and added new things to it. *** By: Prof. Sunita Sinha Head, Department of English Women’s College Samastipur L.N.M.U., Darbhanga Email: [email protected] Website: www.sunitasinha.com Mob No:9934917117 .
Recommended publications
  • V. L. 0. Chittick ANGRY YOUNG POET of the THIRTIES

    V. L. 0. Chittick ANGRY YOUNG POET of the THIRTIES

    V. L. 0. Chittick ANGRY YOUNG POET OF THE THIRTIES THE coMPLETION OF JoHN LEHMANN's autobiography with I Am My Brother (1960), begun with The Whispering Gallery (1955), brings back to mind, among a score of other largely forgotten matters, the fact that there were angry young poets in England long before those of last year-or was it year before last? The most outspoken of the much earlier dissident young verse writers were probably the three who made up the so-called "Oxford group", W. ·H. Auden, Stephen Spender, and C. Day Lewis. (Properly speaking they were never a group in col­ lege, though they knew one ariother as undergraduates and were interested in one another's work.) Whether taken together or singly, .they differed markedly from the young poets who have recently been given the label "angry". What these latter day "angries" are angry about is difficult to determine, unless indeed it is merely for the sake of being angry. Moreover, they seem to have nothing con­ structive to suggest in cure of whatever it is that disturbs them. In sharp contrast, those whom they have displaced (briefly) were angry about various conditions and situations that they were ready and eager to name specifically. And, as we shall see in a moment, they were prepared to do something about them. What the angry young poets of Lehmann's generation were angry about was the heritage of the first World War: the economic crisis, industrial collapse, chronic unemployment, and the increasing tP,reat of a second World War.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Notes Introduction 1. For more on the Romanticism and Classicism debate in the maga- zines, see David Goldie’s Critical Difference: T. S. Eliot and John Middleton Murry in English Literary Criticism, 1918–1929 (69– 127). Harding’s discussion in his book on Eliot’s Criterion of the same debate is also worth reviewing, especially his chapter on Murry’s The Adelphi; see 25–43. 2. Esty suggests that the “relativization of England as one culture among many in the face of imperial contraction seems to have entailed a relativization of literature as one aspect of culture . [as] the late modernist generation absorbed the potential energy of a contracting British state and converted it into the language not of aesthetic decline but of cultural revival” (8). In a similar fashion, despite Jason Harding’s claim that Eliot’s periodical had a “self-appointed role as a guardian of European civilization,” his extensive study of the magazine, The “Criterion”: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Inter-War Britain, as the title indicates, takes Criterion’s “networks” to exist exclusively within Britain (6). 3. See Suzanne W. Churchill, The Little Magazine Others and the Renovation of Modern American Poetry; Eric White, Transat- lantic Avant-Gardes: Little Magazines and Localist Modernism; Adam McKible, The Space and Place of Modernism: The Russian Revolution, Little Magazines, and New York; Mark Morrisson, The Public Face of Modernism: Little Magazines, Audience, and Reception, 1905–1920; Faith Binckes, Modernism, Magazines, and the Avant-Garde: Reading “Rhythm,” 1910–1914. 4. Thompson writes, “Making, because it is a study in an active process, which owes as much to agency as to conditioning.
  • W. H. Auden and His Quest for Love Poems of 1930S a Thesis

    W. H. Auden and His Quest for Love Poems of 1930S a Thesis

    W. H. Auden and His Quest for Love Poems of 1930s A Thesis Presented to The Graduate School of Language and Culture Hiroshima Jogakuin Unxversity In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree Master of Artぷ by Hiromi Ito January 1998 CONTENTS Intro du ction "1929" II "The Wanderer" 23 Ill "A Summer Night {To Geoffrey Hoyland)〟 from Look, Stranger! 30 IV "0 what Is That Sound〝 from Look, Stranger! 42 "On This Island〝 from Look, Stranger! SB VI " Lullaby" 55 Conclusion . 61 Notes 63 Biblio grap hy 64 Intro duc tio n First of all, the writer would like to introduce a brief survey of W. H. Auden's biography. WysLern Hugh Auden was born on the t∬enty-first of February, 1907. in the city of York in the northern part of England. He is the third and last child of George Augustus Auden and Constance Rosalie Brickenell. They two are devout Chrxstians of the Church of England. Wystern was the youngest of three boys. In 1915, he entered St. Edmund School, where he first met Chrxstopher Isherwood. a colleague of his in his later years. Isherwood was three years ahead of Auden in school. Then he want on to Gresham′s school in Holt, Norfolk. He majored in biology, aiming to be a technical expert. He started to write poems in 1922 when his friend, Robert Medley asked him "Do you want to write a poem?" In 1925. he graduated from Gresham′s school, and then entered Christ Church College, Oxford University. He was an honor student majoring in natural sciences, and later he switched off Lo English literature.
  • Sidney Keyes: the War-Poet Who 'Groped for Death'

    Sidney Keyes: the War-Poet Who 'Groped for Death'

    PINAKI ROY Sidney Keyes: The War-Poet Who ‘Groped For Death’ f the Second World War (1939-45) was marked by the unforeseen annihilation of human beings—with approximately 60 million military and civilian deaths (Mercatante 3)—the second global belligerence was also marked by an Iunforeseen scarcity in literary commemoration of the all-destructive belligerence. Unlike the First World War (1914-18) memories of which were recorded mellifluously by numerous efficient poets from both the sides of the Triple Entente and Central Powers, the period of the Second World War witnessed so limited a publication of war-writing in its early stages that the Anglo-Irish litterateur Cecil Day-Lewis (1904-72), then working as a publications-editor at the English Ministry of Information, was galvanised into publishing “Where are the War Poets?” in Penguin New Writing of February 1941, exasperatedly writing: ‘They who in folly or mere greed / Enslaved religion, markets, laws, / Borrow our language now and bid / Us to speak up in freedom’s cause. / It is the logic of our times, / No subject for immortal verse—/ That we who lived by honest dreams / Defend the bad against the worse’. Significantly, while millions of Europeans and Americans enthusiastically enlisted themselves to serve in the Great War and its leaders were principally motivated by the ideas of patriotism, courage, and ancient chivalric codes of conduct, the 1939-45 combat occurred amidst the selfishness of politicians, confusing international politics, and, as William Shirer notes, by unsubstantiated feelings of defeatism among world powers like England and France, who could have deterred the offensive Nazis at the very onset of hostilities (795-813).
  • Sharpe, Tony, 1952– Editor of Compilation

    Sharpe, Tony, 1952– Editor of Compilation

    more information - www.cambridge.org/9780521196574 W. H. AUDen IN COnteXT W. H. Auden is a giant of twentieth-century English poetry whose writings demonstrate a sustained engagement with the times in which he lived. But how did the century’s shifting cultural terrain affect him and his work? Written by distinguished poets and schol- ars, these brief but authoritative essays offer a varied set of coor- dinates by which to chart Auden’s continuously evolving career, examining key aspects of his environmental, cultural, political, and creative contexts. Reaching beyond mere biography, these essays present Auden as the product of ongoing negotiations between him- self, his time, and posterity, exploring the enduring power of his poetry to unsettle and provoke. The collection will prove valuable for scholars, researchers, and students of English literature, cultural studies, and creative writing. Tony Sharpe is Senior Lecturer in English and Creative Writing at Lancaster University. He is the author of critically acclaimed books on W. H. Auden, T. S. Eliot, Vladimir Nabokov, and Wallace Stevens. His essays on modernist writing and poetry have appeared in journals such as Critical Survey and Literature and Theology, as well as in various edited collections. W. H. AUDen IN COnteXT edited by TONY SharPE Lancaster University cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521196574 © Cambridge University Press 2013 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    Index Ackroyd, Peter, 350, 360, 364–65, 399 absence of in Poems (1920), 137–43 on TSE’s work, 205, 213, 244 religious, 367, 373 Action française see Maurras, Charles toward popular culture, 67, 68, 69, 75, Adams, Henry, 151–54 162, 186, 317, 320 “The Ad-Dressing of Cats” (poem), toward women, 332 228–29, 237 “American Literature and the American Adelphi, 390, 391–92, 393 Language” (lecture), 24, 284 Adorno, Theodor, 319 “Andrew Marvell” (essay), 306–08, Advocate (Harvard literary magazine), 4, 308–09 108, 311 Andrewes, Lancelot, 148, 152, 192, 201 Aeschylus, 76, 181, 248, 252 in “Journey of the Magi,” 191, 192, Africa, 87, 170, 346 193 African-American culture and black Anglicanism, TSE’s conversion to, 9, 17, ethnicity, 183–84, 186–87, 318, 54, 291, 337, 372, 399 345–48 effect on TSE’s thought, 47, 87, 133, see also jazz; minstrelsy, blackface; ragtime 191–92, 276–77, 298, 301, 331, After Strange Gods (lectures), 23, 88, 289, 357, 379 293, 298, 363, 373–74, 381, 384, negative reaction to, 9, 363, 429 405 see also Christianity and “free-thinking Jews,” 23–24, 150, “Animula” (poem), 194–96, 197, 234–35 335–36, 346, 381 anthropology, 5, 36–37, 55, 79–90, 142, and “Tradition and theCOPYRIGHTED Individual 251, MATERIAL 396 Talent,” 16, 276 and concept of “culture,” 37–38, 88–90, Agrarianism, 418–19 287, 288–89, 292, 295 Aiken, Conrad, 121, 392, 437 see also primitivism and the primitive; letters from TSE, 6, 58–59, 61, 94–95, ritual 348 anti-Semitism, 150, 319, 335, 381, Alain-Fournier, Henri, 5 423–24, 426–27 Aldington, Richard, 80 condemned
  • Proust's Medusa: Ovid, Evolution, and Modernist Metamorphosis

    Proust's Medusa: Ovid, Evolution, and Modernist Metamorphosis

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2015 Proust's Medusa: Ovid, Evolution, and Modernist Metamorphosis Gregory John Mercurio Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1053 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] PROUST’S MEDUSA: OVID, EVOLUTION, AND MODERNIST METAMORPHOSIS by GREGORY JOHN MERCURIO A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 ii © 2015 GREGORY JOHN MERCURIO All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in English in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Joshua Wilner 4/24/2015 Joshua Wilner Date Chair of Examining Committee Mario DiGangi 4/28/2015 Mario DiGangi Date Executive Officer Wayne Koestenbaum Mary Ann Caws Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract PROUST’S MEDUSA: OVID, EVOLUTION AND MODERNIST METAMORPHOSIS by Gregory John Mercurio Advisor: Joshua Wilner Ovid’s Metamorphoses has served as an indispensible text for Modernism, not least for such foundational Modernists as T. S. Eliot, Ezra Pound and Wyndham Lewis. This dissertation examines how these writers characteristically employ Ovidian metamorphoses with a specifically evolutionary inflection, particularly in a post- Darwinian world informed by varying –often authoritarian– notions of biological adaptation, as well as an increasing emphasis on Mendalian genetics as the determining factor in what would become known as the Modern Synthesis in evolutionary theory.
  • 'More Than Glass': Louis Macneice's Poetics of Expansion

    'More Than Glass': Louis Macneice's Poetics of Expansion

    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ‘More than glass’: Louis MacNeice’s Poetics of Expansion A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of English School of Arts & Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Michael A. Moir, Jr. Washington, DC 2012 ‘More than glass’: Louis MacNeice’s Poetics of Expansion Michael A. Moir, Jr., PhD Director: Virgil Nemoianu, PhD The Northern Irish poet and dramatist Louis MacNeice, typically regarded as a minor modernist following in the footsteps of Yeats and Eliot or living in the shadow of Auden, is different from his most important predecessors and contemporaries in the way he attempts to explode conventional ideas of place, presenting human subjects in transit and shifting, melting landscapes, rooms and buildings that tend to blend in with their sur- roundings. While Yeats, Eliot and Auden evince a siege mentality that leads them to build religious or political Utopias easily separable from the chaos of the contemporary world, MacNeice denies the validity of any such imaginary constructs, instead taking apart the boundaries of imaginary private worlds, from rooms to islands to pastoral landscapes. Mac- Neice’s representations of space favor what Fredric Jameson terms ‘postmodern space’: his poems and radio plays operate outside of ideas of ‘home,’ ‘church,’ or ‘nation,’ opposing the rigidity of such places to the fluidity of travel. MacNeice has been much misunderstood and underestimated, and a reappraisal of his career is due, particularly given the amount of material that has been published or reis- sued since his centenary in 2007.
  • 1. Taming the Monster 1. Geoffrey Grigson, 'Auden As a Monster', New

    1. Taming the Monster 1. Geoffrey Grigson, 'Auden As a Monster', New

    Notes 1. Taming the Monster 1. Geoffrey Grigson, ‘Auden as a Monster’, New Verse, 26–7 (1937), 13–17 (p. 13). 2. New Signatures appeared for the first time in 1932, New Country in 1933; New Verse was published from January 1933 until January 1939, New Writing from Spring 1936 until 1950. See Samuel Hynes, The Auden Generation: Literature and Politics in England in the 1930s (London and Boston: Faber & Faber, 1976), pp. 74–5, 102, 114, 198. 3. Richard Hoggart’s Auden: An Introductory Essay (London: Chatto & Windus, 1951), the first and surprisingly good study of Auden’s works, set the tone with the remark ‘Auden’s poetry is particularly concerned with the pressures of the times’, p. 9. 4. François Duchêne, The Case of the Helmeted Airman: A Study of W. H. Auden’s Poetry (London: Chatto & Windus, 1972) is an unpleasant example of this vivisection attitude that regards the author as a part of the texts and endeavours to supply its reader not only with a textual analysis, but glimpses of the author’s psyche. Herbert Greenberg, Quest for the Necessary: W. H. Auden and the Dilemma of Divided Con- sciousness (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1968) is a more sensitive study. 5. Auden himself proves a perceptive commentator on such attitudes when he writes in the preface to The Poet’s Tongue of 1935, ‘The psy- chologist maintains that poetry is a neurotic symptom, an attempt to compensate by phantasy for a failure to meet reality. We must tell him that phantasy is only the beginning of writing; that, on the contrary, like psychology, poetry is a struggle to reconcile the unwilling subject and object; in fact, that since psychological truth depends so largely on context, poetry, the parabolic approach, is the only adequate medium for psychology’ (Pr 108).
  • Allegiance in the Poetry of Stephen Spender, 1928-1935

    Allegiance in the Poetry of Stephen Spender, 1928-1935

    Allegiance in the Poetry of Stephen Spender, 1928-1935 Michael Brett Ph.D. in English Literature University College London 2002 ProQuest Number: U643127 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643127 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The study aims to provide a detailed analysis of Stephen Spender’s verse up to 1935, with particular attention to his use of the language of contemporary political discourse. It examines the interrelation of Spender’s poetry with the literary milieu of late modernism within which it first appeared, analysing the reception of his published volumes and the dissemination of early critical ideas about his writing. The texts which provide the basis for the study are Nine Experiments (1928), Twenty Poems (1930), Poems (1933/1934) and Vienna (1934). Also examined is the concurrent development of Spender’s reputation under the editorship of Michael Roberts (the anthologies New Signatures and New Country) and Geoffrey Grigson (the periodical New Verse), whose disparate analyses of Spender’s strengths identify his conflicting allegiances to socialist thought and to literary tradition.
  • Auden at Work / Edited by Bonnie Costello, Rachel Galvin

    Auden at Work / Edited by Bonnie Costello, Rachel Galvin

    Copyrighted material – 978–1–137–45292–4 Introduction, selection and editorial matter © Bonnie Costello and Rachel Galvin 2015 Individual chapters © Contributors 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–1–137–45292–4 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin.
  • Auden's Revisions

    Auden's Revisions

    Auden’s Revisions By W. D. Quesenbery for Marilyn and in memoriam William York Tindall Grellet Collins Simpson © 2008, William D. Quesenbery Acknowledgments Were I to list everyone (and their affiliations) to whom I owe a debt of gratitude for their help in preparing this study, the list would be so long that no one would bother reading it. Literally, scores of reference librarians in the eastern United States and several dozen more in the United Kingdom stopped what they were doing, searched out a crumbling periodical from the stacks, made a Xerox copy and sent it along to me. I cannot thank them enough. Instead of that interminable list, I restrict myself to a handful of friends and colleagues who were instrumental in the publication of this book. First and foremost, Edward Mendelson, without whose encouragement this work would be moldering in Columbia University’s stacks; Gerald M. Pinciss, friend, colleague and cheer-leader of fifty-odd years standing, who gave up some of his own research time in England to seek out obscure citations; Robert Mohr, then a physics student at Swarthmore College, tracked down citations from 1966 forward when no English literature student stepped forward; Ken Prager and Whitney Quesenbery, computer experts who helped me with technical problems and many times saved this file from disappearing into cyberspace;. Emily Prager, who compiled the Index of First Lines and Titles. Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Table of Contents 4 General Introduction 7 Using the Appendices 14 PART I. PAID ON BOTH SIDES (1928) 17 Appendix 19 PART II.