DOCSLIB.ORG

Urbis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urbis Report Campbell’s Stores Visual Impact Assessment October 2016 URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE: Director Peter Haack Director Jennifer Cooper Senior Consultant Celeste Martin Senior Consultant Samantha Wilson Job Code SA5710 Report Number Campbell’s Store Updated VIA-FINAL © Urbis Pty Ltd ABN 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. You must read the important disclaimer appearing within the body of this report. URBIS Australia Asia Middle East urbis.com.au TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Visual Impact Assessment Scope and Methodology ........................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Existing Environmental Values .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Assessment of Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Significance of Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Policy Framework .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Limitations of the VIA ......................................................................................................................... 7 2 Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Site Description.................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Components of the Modified Project ............................................................................................... 11 3 Landscape Character Assessment .............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Existing Landscape Character and Sensitivity ................................................................................ 12 3.2 Significant Heritage Items ................................................................................................................ 15 3.3 Landscape Character Zones ........................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Landscape Character Impacts ......................................................................................................... 19 4 Visual Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Visibility of the Proposal .................................................................................................................. 23 4.2 Viewpoint Locations ......................................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Visual Simulations ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.4 Visual Impact Assessment .............................................................................................................. 24 4.5 Proposed Publicly Accessible Through Site Connection To Sydney Cove Waterfront ................... 63 5 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 64 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................................. 65 Appendix A Visual Impact Assessment by Virtual Ideas FIGURES: Figure 1 – Subject Site (Source: www.google.com.au/Maps) ....................................................................... 8 Figure 2 – Existing Development (Source: Urbis, 2015) ............................................................................... 9 Figure 3 – Site Context (Source: Nearmaps.com) ...................................................................................... 12 Figure 4 – Locality Photograph (Source: JPW, 2014) ................................................................................. 13 Figure 5 – Sydney Opera House Buffer Zone (Source: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/166, 2016) .............. 16 Figure 6 – Landscape Character Zones (Source: Urbis, 2015) .................................................................. 17 Figure 7 – Key Viewpoints/Camera Locations (Source: Urbis, 2016) ......................................................... 24 Figure 8 – Viewpoint 01 – Sydney Opera House North, Bennelong Point – Existing View ........................ 26 Figure 9 – Viewpoint 01 – Sydney Opera House North, Bennelong Point – Visualisation ......................... 26 Figure 10 – Viewpoint 02 – Upper Level – Terrace adjoining Concert HALL – Visualisation ..................... 28 Figure 11 – Viewpoint 03 – Sydney Opera House, Upper Level - Top of Main Front Stairs – Existing View ................................................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 12 – Viewpoint 03 – Sydney Opera House, Upper Level Top Of Main Front Stairs – Visualisation30 Figure 13 – Viewpoint 04 – Sydney Opera House, Lower Level - Exit from Playhouse and Outdoor Dining Area – Existing View .................................................................................................................. 32 URBIS RPT_UPDATED VIA-FINAL_241016 Figure 14 – Viewpoint 04 – Sydney Opera House, Lower Level - Exit From Playhouse And Outdoor Dining Area – Visualisation ....................................................................................................... 32 Figure 15 – Viewpoint 05 – Sydney Opera House, External Seating midway along Foreshore Area – Existing View ............................................................................................................................. 34 Figure 16 – Viewpoint 05 – Sydney Opera House, External Seating Midway Along Foreshore Area – Visualisation .............................................................................................................................. 34 Figure 17 – Viewpoint 06 – Sydney Opera House, Top of External Stairs from Foreshore Promenade to SOH – Existing View ................................................................................................................. 36 Figure 18 – Viewpoint 06 – Sydney Opera House, Top Of External Stairs From Foreshore Promenade To SOH – Visualisation .................................................................................................................. 36 Figure 19 – Viewpoint 07 – Sydney Opera House South, Bennelong Point – Existing View ..................... 38 Figure 20 – Viewpoint 07 – Sydney Opera House South, Bennelong Point – Visualisation ...................... 38 Figure 21 – Viewpoint 08 – Sydney Harbour Ferry – Existing View ........................................................... 40 Figure 22 – Viewpoint 08 – Sydney Harbour Ferry – Visualisation ............................................................ 40 Figure 23 – Viewpoint 09 – North End of Overseas Passenger Terminal, Sydney Foreshore – Existing View ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Figure 24 – Viewpoint 09 – North End of Overseas Passenger Terminal, Sydney Foreshore – Visualisation .............................................................................................................................. 42 Figure 25 – Viewpoint 10 – Southeast Corner of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Existing View .. 44 Figure 26 – Viewpoint 10 – Southeast Corner of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Visualisation ... 44 Figure 27 – Viewpoint 11 – West Edge of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Existing View............. 46 Figure 28 – Viewpoint 11 – West Edge of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Visualisation .............. 46 Figure 29 – Viewpoint 12 – North Edge of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Existing View ............ 48 Figure 30 – Viewpoint 12 – North Edge of Campbell’s Cove, Sydney Foreshore – Visualisation ............. 48 Figure 31 – Viewpoint 13 – East Bay 12 – Existing Views ......................................................................... 50 Figure 32 – Viewpoint 13 – East Bay 12 – Visualisation ............................................................................ 50 Figure 33 – Viewpoint 14 – Intersection Of Hickson Road And George Street – Existing Views .............. 52 Figure 34 – Viewpoint 14 – Intersection of Hickson Road and George Street – Visualisation .................. 52 Figure 35 – Viewpoint 15 – West of Hickson Road at Bay X – Existing View ............................................ 54 Figure 36 – Viewpoint 15 – West of Hickson Road at Bay X – Visualisation ............................................. 54 Figure 37 – Viewpoint 16 – West
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Gina Rinehart 2. Anthony Pratt & Family • 3. Harry Triguboff
    1. Gina Rinehart $14.02billion from Resources Chairman – Hancock Prospecting Residence: Perth Wealth last year: $20.01b Rank last year: 1 A plunging iron ore price has made a big dent in Gina Rinehart’s wealth. But so vast are her mining assets that Rinehart, chairman of Hancock Prospecting, maintains her position as Australia’s richest person in 2015. Work is continuing on her $10billion Roy Hill project in Western Australia, although it has been hit by doubts over its short-term viability given falling commodity prices and safety issues. Rinehart is pressing ahead and expects the first shipment late in 2015. Most of her wealth comes from huge royalty cheques from Rio Tinto, which mines vast swaths of tenements pegged by Rinehart’s late father, Lang Hancock, in the 1950s and 1960s. Rinehart's wealth has been subject to a long running family dispute with a court ruling in May that eldest daughter Bianca should become head of the $5b family trust. 2. Anthony Pratt & Family $10.76billion from manufacturing and investment Executive Chairman – Visy Residence: Melbourne Wealth last year: $7.6billion Rank last year: 2 Anthony Pratt’s bet on a recovering United States economy is paying off. The value of his US-based Pratt Industries has surged this year thanks to an improving manufacturing sector and a lower Australian dollar. Pratt is also executive chairman of box maker and recycling business Visy, based in Melbourne. Visy is Australia’s largest private company by revenue and the biggest Australian-owned employer in the US. Pratt inherited the Visy leadership from his late father Richard in 2009, though the firm’s ownership is shared with sisters Heloise Waislitz and Fiona Geminder.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Kit 2020
    SYDNEY MEDIA KIT 2020 www.wheretraveller.com Photo: © Hugh Stewart/Destination NSW. The tourism market in VISITORS* SPEND In2019 $34billion 41.5 million visited PER YEAR Sydney the greater Sydney region IN SYDNEY *International and domestic INTERNATIONAL The Gateway to Australia % VISITOR OVERNIGHT VISITORS NUMBERS TO AUSTRALIA SPEND Most international visitors 40 INCREASED TRIPS REPRESENT arrive in Sydney first when LEISURE TRAVEL % % they come to Australia. 11 BETWEEN 39 2018-19 OF THEIR DOLLARS IN SYDNEY 3.1 NIGHTS 37.9the million average visitors to 1 = China 2 = USA the greaterduration Sydney of stay region TOURIST 3 = New Zealand SPENDING: 4 = United Kingdom Record growth of domestic and TOP 5 5 = South Korea international visitors year on year NATIONALITIES Photo: Destination NSW. Sources: Destination NSW and Tourism Research Australia wheretraveller.com Print: a trusted and versatile media solution We can create diverse media READERS ARE products to make your campaign % effective such as advertorials, inserts, magazine covers, editorial 70 listings and much more. MORE LIKELY TO RECALL YOUR • In-r oom placement in BRAND IN PRINT (source: Forbes) 5, 4.5 and 4 star hotels for guaranteed visibility to the lucrative visitor market WHERETRAVELLER MAGAZINE • We can create custom content READERSHIP: • Diverse and current coverage across bars, restaurants, 226,000 entertainment, shopping, PER MONTH sightseeing and more WhereTraveller products are supported by Les Clefs d’Or Australia, the International Concierge Society wheretraveller.com WhereTraveller Magazine: the complete guide WhereTraveller Magazine is a monthly guidebook-style magazine that readers can easily take with them when they explore each city’s top restaurants, shops, shows, attractions, exhibits and tours.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Consultation the SOHT Has Undertaken Extensive
    APPENDIX 2 – Stakeholder Consultation The SOHT has undertaken extensive consultation on the Building Renewal Program, including the proposed Concert Hall, Under the Steps, Creative Learning Centre and Southern Foyers project as summarised in Table 1 below: Stakeholder Consultation Summary Resident Companies: • The Sydney Opera House’s Renewal program governance structure was established in late 2015, which includes: • Monthly senior management meetings with the resident companies, including • Opera Australia • The Australian Ballet • Sydney Symphony Orchestra • Sydney Philharmonic Choirs • Australian Chamber Orchestra • Bangarra Dance Theatre • Bell Shakespeare • Sydney Theatre Company • Quarterly meetings with the CEO of the Opera House and resident company CEOs • The Creative Learning Centre, Under the Steps and Southern Foyers projects have been raised and discussed at the Senior Management Forums throughout 2016. Eminent Architects • The EAP provides advice to the SOHT and management on issues of Panel architecture or design, and in relation to the management and conservation of the building. Four to five formal meetings are held each year. The EAP has been briefed regularly on the Creative Learning Centre, Under the Steps and Southern Foyers, and was involved in the design process. • Current members of the EAP include: • Mr Peter Poulet, Chair (NSW Government Architect) • Mr Jan Utzon • Mr Peter Mould • Mr Ken Maher • Ms Abbie Galvin Conservation Council • The Conservation Council provides advice to the SOHT and management team on conservation and heritage matters. Four to five formal Conservation Council meetings are held each year. It is chaired by an Opera House Trustee, and comprises representatives from key external organisations, heritage and architectural specialists, and a number of management representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 4Th December 2020
    Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 4th December 2020 Sydney Opera House Bennelong Point Report Reference: 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 2020-12-04 - Revision 1 8 December 2020 Project Number: 20164 Version: Revision 1 Sydney Opera House 8 December 2020 Bennelong Point Revision 1 Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 4th December 2020 PREPARED BY: Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd ABN 61 614 634 525 Level 5, 73 Walker Street, North Sydney, 2060 Alex Danon Mob: +61 452 578 573 E: [email protected] www.pulseacoustics.com.au This report has been prepared by Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with the Client. Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of Sydney Opera House No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from Pulse Acoustic. Pulse Acoustic disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Status Date Prepared Checked Authorised 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Final 8th December Alex Danon Alex Danon Matthew Harrison Noise Measurements – 2020-12-04 - Revision 1 2020 Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd Page 2 of 24 Sydney Opera House 8 December 2020 Bennelong Point Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Key Assessment Requirements
    Chapter 7 Key assessment requirements 7.1 Heritage and archaeology An Archaeological Management Plan and Heritage Impact Statement for the project was prepared by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd (2009). A summary of the findings of the assessment is provided in this section. The full report is provided in Appendix B. 7.1.1 Methodology The assessment was undertaken following a thorough conservation planning process. It considered potential Aboriginal and historical archaeological resources. The methodology was based on the guidelines contained in the NSW Heritage Manual and the Archaeological Assessments (Department of Urban Affairs and Planning and the Heritage Council of NSW, 1996) and applies the principles contained in The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance 1999. 7.1.2 Existing environment History of Bennelong Point There has been development on Bennelong Point since the earliest period of European settlement in Sydney Cove between 1788 and 1795, when Bennelong Point was the location of Bennelong’s brick hut and a salt works and windmill. The early settlers also recognised the defensive value of Bennelong Point and a redoubt was constructed in 1789, which was later replaced by a ‘half moon battery’ in 1798. Work commenced on the construction of a fort (Fort Macquarie) at the northern tip of Bennelong Point in 1817, with large parts of the rest of the peninsula and surrounding area being reserved for parks and public space. Fort Macquarie dominated the area between 1817 and 1901. In the late nineteenth century the western shore of Bennelong Point was converted for use by trading companies for major longshore wool, mail and passenger wharves, whilst the western rampart of the fort was demolished to make way for facilities associated with the P&O operation that dominated the western shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 18Th February 2021
    Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 18th February 2021 Sydney Opera House Bennelong Point Report Reference: 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 2021-02-18 - Revision 1 23 February 2021 Project Number: 20164 Version: Revision 1 Sydney Opera House 23 February 2021 Bennelong Point Revision 1 Sydney Opera House (SOH) – Attended Construction Noise Measurements – 18th February 2021 PREPARED BY: Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd ABN 61 614 634 525 Level 5, 73 Walker Street, North Sydney, 2060 This report has been prepared by Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with the Client. Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of Sydney Opera House No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from Pulse Acoustic. Pulse Acoustic disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Status Date Prepared Checked Authorised 20164 Sydney Opera House – Attended Construction Final 23rd February Douglass Alex Danon Matthew Harrison Noise Measurements – 2021-02-18 - Revision 1 2021 Harrison Pulse Acoustic Consultancy Pty Ltd Page 2 of 29 Sydney Opera House 23 February 2021 Bennelong Point Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 2 SITE DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Street and East Circular Quay Sydney New Year's Eve
    December 2018 2018 Sydney New Year’s Eve – Macquarie Street and East Circular Quay Sydney New Year’s Eve attracts over a million people to Sydney Harbour and more than one billion people across the globe. Getting in and out of the city is different on New Year’s Eve. There will be road closures, on-street fencing and diversions to help people get around safely. Changed parking conditions Once a road is closed, you, your guests, or suppliers / contractors will not be able to gain access to or exit from car parks and loading docks. Sections of Macquarie Street will be closed from as early as 4am on the morning of New Year’s Eve. It is an offence to drive on closed roads, even from car parks. Plan your movements ahead of time. Special event clearway parking restrictions These will be in place on Macquarie Street, Circular Quay and throughout the Sydney CBD early on New Year’s Eve until New Year’s Day. Clearways are strict ‘no-parking’ zones, even for local residents and mobility scheme permit holders. Vehicles in clearways will be towed and a fee will apply. Special event clearways will be in effect from: 2am on New Year’s Eve to 4am on New Year’s Day on Macquarie Street between Bridge Street and the Opera House roundabout (both sides). 6am on New Year’s Eve to 4am on New Year’s Day on roads through East Circular Quay and remainder of the Sydney CBD. Look for the bright yellow signs and read them carefully when parking, particularly on the night before.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 17-10805-LSS Doc 409 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 268 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 UNILIFE CORPORATION, et al., 1 Case No. 17-10805 (LSS) Debtors. (Jointly Administered) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss.: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } Darleen Sahagun, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am employed by Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, located at 5955 DeSoto Avenue, Suite 100, Woodland Hills, CA 91367. I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the above- captioned action. 2. On October 30, 2017, I caused to be served the: Notice/Debtors’ Motion for Approval of Settlement of Certain Claims with Present and Former Officers and Directors, and Certain Plaintiffs and Their Counsel [Docket No. 406] Notice of Filing of Corrected Exhibit [Docket No. 407] By causing true and correct copies to be served via first-class mail, postage pre-paid to the names and addresses of the parties listed as follows: I. Docket No. 406 and Docket No. 407 to those parties listed on the annexed Exhibit A, II. Docket No. 406 (Notice Only) to those parties on the annexed Exhibit B, Also, by causing true and correct copies to be served via email to the parties listed as follows: /// 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are the following entities (the last four digits of each Debtor’s respective federal tax identification number, if any, follow in parentheses): Unilife Corporation (9354), Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. (9944), and Unilife Cross Farm LLC (3994).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Operational Plan of Management
    OPERATIONAL PLAN OF MANAGEMENT Food and Beverage Lower Concourse Level Sydney Opera House Sydney NSW 2000 1 6 August 2020 1.1 Introduction This Operational Plan of Management (the Plan) outlines the management framework for the Lower Concourse (Premises) of the Sydney Opera House. The Plan, which has been prepared after consultation with NSW Police, meets the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements with respect to the Premises (including under the development consent SSD-9794) and complements more detailed operational guidelines, including those in the Sydney Opera House (SOH) Commercial Operations Manual: Food and Beverage Operators and the SOH Operational Noise and Vibration Management Plan (Attached) The Plan provides for the ongoing management of the Lower Concourse venues in a manner which will ensure that: • The Premises is properly managed, risks have been assessed and patrons are safe; • Complaints are managed appropriately; and • The operation of the Premises does not impact detrimentally upon or detract from the amenity of the surrounding community. The Plan is in addition to the obligations of operators of food and beverage or other retail premises on the Lower Concourse (Operators) who have liquor licences, under the Liquor Act 2007, the liquor licence and any relevant regulation. Those liquor licences may also provide that that the licensee has an obligation to have a plan of management (POM) and if so, the Operator must: • Maintain its POM in accordance with its obligations under the licence (including, where relevant, by making it available to SOHT and the NSW police); and • Ensuring that the POM is not inconsistent with this Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sydney Harbour YHA
    Case Study : The Sydney Harbour YHA The Rocks area The Rocks is the oldest district of Sydney and, arguably, one of its most important in terms of the city’s European settlement history. Dating back to the 1790s CE, The Rocks was a mainly convict area where they and their families built their homes. Archaeological evidence from what is now known as The Big Dig site suggests the convicts living here had a far better standard of living than their counterparts did back in Britain and Ireland. The Rocks grew rapidly and, by 1900, it was an area characterised by tightly-packed housing (see picture below) leased by the lower-skilled, working classes. The area was frequently referred to in official reports and sensationalised by journalists as a dirty slum. Today the area contains many buildings dating back to the early 19th century and includes several historical museums, including the Susannah Place Museum and The Rocks Discovery Museum. Because of its historical importance to Sydney, great care has been taken to preserve its buildings and the wider neighbourhood. Of course, Australia was occupied tens of thousands of years before European sailors started to circumnavigate, then land on its continent. In most instances ancient, indigenous populations do not leave heavy traces of their occupation and management of the landscape. However archaeological excavations nearby to The Rocks have, for example, revealed a camp fire dating to the 1400s CE, which evidenced many meals of snapper fish and rock oysters. © UTS:CAREERS with UTS FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND IT 14-Feb-14 1 From its earliest European settlement until relatively recently, The Rocks held a reputation as a dangerous place.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017–18 Contents About Us
    Annual Report 2017–18 Contents About Us 03. About Us General Sir John Monash Foundation Our mission is to invest in outstanding An excerpt from the speech of 2006 John Monash Scholar Ground Floor, Bennelong House, 9 Queen Street Australians from all fields of endeavour Dr Bridget Vincent at the Spirit of Australia Commemorative Service 04. Message from the Chairman Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia at Parliament House in Melbourne on 11 August 2017. who demonstrate remarkable qualities 05. The Year In Review Telephone: +61 3 9620 2428 of leadership and have the ability to deliver Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery once said: ‘I would name Sir Email: [email protected] outcomes and inspire others for the benefit John Monash as the best General on the Western Front in Europe.’ 06. 165 John Monash Scholars Web: www.johnmonash.com So far, so familiar. But then he also said that Monash ‘possessed of Australia. real creative originality.’ Monash wasn’t a brilliant strategist who 07. 2018 Scholarship Selection also happened to like literature and philosophy and music. Rather, johnmonashfoundation The General Sir John Monash Foundation it’s a distinct possibility that his decisions as a strategist couldn’t 09. 2018 John Monash Scholars @MonashScholars was established in 2001 with an initial have happened without the training he received in other areas. general-sir-john-monash-foundation 12. Where are they now? contribution from the Australian Federal You even see this in his language. He described military strategy in https://www.youtube.com/c/ Government together with further musical terms: he once wrote, for instance, that ‘a perfected modern 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Shade Cover Improvements Sydney Opera House: Lower Concourse
    SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE Shade Cover Improvements Sydney Opera House: Lower Concourse Environmental Impact Statement to Accompany a State Significant Development Application ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT STATE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SSD 7430 LOWER CONCOURSE SHADE COVER IMPROVEMENTS SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE: LOWER CONCOURSE Prepared by BBC Consulting Planners Job No. 15-260A eis shade structures.docx February 2016 55 MOUNTAIN STREET BROADWAY NSW ~ PO BOX 438 BROADWAY NSW 2007 ~ TELEPHONE [02] 9211 4099 FAX [02] 9211 2740 EMAIL: [email protected] ~ WEB SITE: www.bbcplanners.com.au ABN 061 868 942 Certification of Environmental Impact Assessment Applicant, Site and Project Details Applicant Sydney Opera House Trust Sydney Opera House GPO Box 4274 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Site: Sydney Opera House Bennelong Point Real Property Description: Lot 5 in Deposited Plan 775888 Lot 4 in Deposited Plan 787933 Proposal: Lower Concourse Shade Cover Improvements Authorship This report has been prepared by: Dan Brindle Level 2, 55 Mountain Street, Broadway, NSW 2007 Declaration I certify that the contents of the Environmental Impact Assessment to the best of my knowledge, has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of clauses 6 and 7 of Schedule 2 of Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000; contains all available information that is relevant to the assessment of the development and that to the best of my knowledge the information contained in this report is neither false nor misleading. Signed by: Date: 16 February 2016 SUMMARY OF THE EIS The Proposed Development This Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) has been prepared as part of a State Significant Development Application lodged pursuant to Section 78A(8A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (“the EP&A Act”) for shade cover improvements on the Lower Concourse of Sydney Opera House.
    [Show full text]