DOCSLIB.ORG

Maori Purpose Zone As Notified in the PAUP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of TOPIC 080g Rezoning and Precincts (General) AND IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report EVIDENCE REPORT ON SUBMISSIONS BY JYM HALLAM CLARK ON THE MĀORI PURPOSE ZONE 3 DECEMBER 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 PART A: OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND ......................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 3. CODE OF CONDUCT .................................................................................................... 1 4. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................... 2 5. INTERIM GUIDANCE FROM THE PANEL .................................................................... 2 6. APPROACH TO ZONING WITHIN THE PAUP .............................................................. 3 7. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................... 3 8. PAUP FRAMEWORK TO THE MĀORI PURPOSE ZONE ............................................. 3 PART B –REZONING SUBMISSIONS AND ANALYSIS ....................................................... 5 9. ZONING SUBMISSION THEMES .................................................................................. 5 10. ANALYSIS OF ZONING SUBMISSIONS .................................................................... 6 11. EXPLANATION OF MAPPING ................................................................................... 7 12. CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 7 ATTACHMENT A: STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE ............................................................. 9 ATTACHMENT B: ZONING ANALYSIS AND PLANNER POSITION .................................. 10 ATTACHMENT C: ANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS ............................................................. 16 1. SUMMARY 1.1 The purpose of this Evidence Report (Report) is to consider zone-specific submissions and further submissions to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) for Topic 080g Rezoning and Precincts General (Topic 080g) in relation to the spatial extent of the Special Purpose - Māori Purpose zone. 1.2 The Report includes my proposals on whether the council supports or does not support the submissions, in full or in part, and what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in submissions. 1.3 In summary I consider that six existing marae in Auckland should be rezoned as Māori Purpose, as requested by submissions. This would ensure that most marae in Tamaki Makaurau have a zone which reflects the social the cultural outcomes of the marae activity. In addition, I support all the locations of the Maori Purpose zone as notified in the PAUP. 1.4 I do not support submissions seeking to remove the Maori Purpose zone at Te Atatu Marae or add it to new locations such as cultural redress properties which have public open space and conservation values, such as rezoning the Tūpuna Maunga. PART A: OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 The purpose of this Report is to consider submissions and further submissions received by the Council in relation to the spatial extent of the Special Purpose - Māori Purpose zone and in particular requests to rezone specific sites. 2.2 This Report has been prepared by Jym Hallam Clark. My qualifications and experience is attached in Attachment A. 2.3 The Report includes my proposals on whether to support or not support the submissions, in full or in part, and what amendments, if any, should be made to address matters raised in submissions. 3. CODE OF CONDUCT 3.1 I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and that I agree to comply with it. I confirm Page 1 that I have considered all the material facts that I am aware of that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express, and that this Report is within my area of expertise. 4. SCOPE 4.1 I am providing an evidence report in relation to submissions received to rezone sites from and to the Special Purpose - Māori Purpose zone across the Auckland region. 4.2 In preparing this Report I have relied on the Auckland-wide evidence of John Duguid for Topic 080 and Topic 081 Rezoning and Precincts Geographic (Topic 080) which sets out the statutory framework, methodology, principles and section 32 evaluations, used to guide the development and application of zones and precincts. I have read and accept this evidence. 4.3 My response to the submissions regarding Puketutu Island has been prepared in conjunction with Ms Lucy Deverall, and should be read in conjunction with the parts of the Public Open Space Rezoning Evidence, dated 3 December 2015. 4.4 I have previously prepared primary1 and rebuttal2 evidence with respect to the objectives, polices and methods for the Maori Purpose zone for Topic 036. With respect to the Maori Purpose zone, my evidence did not propose to make significant changes generally as there were few submissions with respect to it, and the zone provisions were in a workable condition at notification of the PAUP. Changes were made to the objectives and policies to reflect the changes made to the Auckland-wide Maori Land and Treaty settlement land sections which have similar objectives and policies. 5. INTERIM GUIDANCE FROM THE PANEL 5.1 The Panel has provided interim guidance with respect to rezoning which I have read, the following in particular: (a) Chapter G: General Provisions, dated 9 March 2015; (b) Best practice approaches to re-zoning and precincts, dated 31 July 2015; (c) Chapter G General Provisions, dated 9 October 2015. 1 Statement of primary evidence of Jym Hallam Clark, notably section 16, dated 17 April 2015. 2 Statement of rebuttal evidence of Jym Hallam Clark, notably section 11, dated 18 May 2015. Page 2 6. APPROACH TO ZONING WITHIN THE PAUP 6.1 The Council’s zoning principles are set out in Mr Duguid’s statements of evidence for Topic 080, dated 3 December 2015 I have read and agree with this evidence. 6.2 Section 32 and 32AA 6.3 As outlined in the Auckland Unitary Plan Evaluation Report (the Evaluation Report), the Council has focussed its section 32 assessment on the objectives and provisions within the PAUP that represent significant changes in approach from those within the current operative Auckland RMA policies and plans. Whilst the Evaluation Report applies to the entire plan, the report targets the 50 topics where the provisions represent a significant policy shift. 6.4 The spatial extent to which the Māori Purpose zone is applied does not reflect a major policy shift from the operative plans which are evaluated in this Report in accordance with the s32 analysis which was notified with the PAUP. The new locations proposed in this evidence would continue to apply to marae and other Maori cultural and educational institutions in the same way as the legacy plans. 7. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 7.1 The statutory framework is detailed in the evidence of Mr Duguid, dated 3 December 2015 and is not repeated here. 8. PAUP FRAMEWORK TO THE MĀORI PURPOSE ZONE 8.1 The approach of providing for the Māori Purpose zone within the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) was discussed in my evidence on behalf of Auckland Council for Topic 036. In my evidence, I supported the retention of the Māori Purpose zone,3 Including objectives and policies which allow the Māori Purpose zone to be located in urban, rural and coastal areas, including beyond the Rural Urban Boundary (RUB). 8.2 The PAUP Regional Policy Statement recognises Maori economic, social and cultural development as an issue of significance to Mana Whenua (B5.3). With respect to the Maori Purpose zone, B5.3 provides for the development of Maori cultural institutions (Policy 4) and provides for papakāinga, marae, customary use, cultural activities and commercial activities across urban and rural Auckland (Policy 1). The Maori Purpose zone is recognised as a regulatory method in B5.3. 3 Jym Clark, Topic 036 EIC, paragraphs 10.4 – 10.6. Page 3 8.3 The notified PAUP specifically provides for Māori cultural, social and economic activities on their ancestral lands through the Auckland-wide Māori land and Treaty settlement land provisions, as well as the Special Purpose – Māori Purpose zone. The Māori Purpose zone provisions enables papakāinga, small scale care centres and retail, marae, education facilities, organised sport, urupā and other activities which provide for Māori cultural activities. 8.4 The range of activities provided in the Māori Purpose zone is also provided for in other urban PAUP zones, typically requiring a restricted discretionary or discretionary resource consent. Notably, the Māori Purpose zone permits marae and associated activities and provides for these to be co-located. 8.5 The Māori Purpose zone is mostly a rollover of legacy plan Māori special purpose zones4. Five additional locations were included in the Māori Purpose zone for the notification of the PAUP in 2013. The PAUP has 15 Māori Purpose zone locations, mostly marae, but also includes kura
Recommended publications
  • Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule

    Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule

    Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule [rcp/dp] Introduction The factors in B4.2.2(4) have been used to determine the features included in Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule, and will be used to assess proposed future additions to the schedule. ID Name Location Site type Description Unitary Plan criteria 2 Algies Beach Algies Bay E This site is one of the a, b, g melange best examples of an exposure of the contact between Northland Allocthon and Miocene Waitemata Group rocks. 3 Ambury Road Mangere F A complex 140m long a, b, c, lava cave Bridge lava cave with two d, g, i branches and many well- preserved flow features. Part of the cave contains unusual lava stalagmites with corresponding stalactites above. 4 Anawhata Waitākere A This locality includes a a, c, e, gorge and combination of g, i, l beach unmodified landforms, produced by the dynamic geomorphic processes of the Waitakere coast. Anawhata Beach is an exposed sandy beach, accumulated between dramatic rocky headlands. Inland from the beach, the Anawhata Stream has incised a deep gorge into the surrounding conglomerate rock. 5 Anawhata Waitākere E A well-exposed, and a, b, g, l intrusion unusual mushroom-shaped andesite intrusion in sea cliffs in a small embayment around rocks at the north side of Anawhata Beach. 6 Arataki Titirangi E The best and most easily a, c, l volcanic accessible exposure in breccia and the eastern Waitākere sandstone Ranges illustrating the interfingering nature of Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule the coarse volcanic breccias from the Waitākere Volcano with the volcanic-poor Waitematā Basin sandstone and siltstones.
  • Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA

    Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 with DATA for the SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA

    Auckland plan targets: monitoring report 2015 WITH DATA FOR THE SOUTHERN INITIATIVE AREA Auckland Plan Targets: Monitoring Report 2015 With Data for the Southern Initiative Area March 2016 Technical Report 2016/007 Auckland Council Technical Report 2016/007 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-0-9941350-0-1 (Print) ISBN 978-0-9941350-1-8 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Submitted for review on 26 February 2016 Review completed on 18 March 2016 Reviewed by one reviewer. Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Lucy Baragwanath Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation Unit Date: 18 March 2016 Recommended citation Wilson, R., Reid, A and Bishop, C (2016). Auckland Plan targets: monitoring report 2015 with data for the Southern Initiative area. Auckland Council technical report, TR2016/007 Note This technical report updates and replaces Auckland Council technical report TR2015/030 Auckland Plan Targets: monitoring report 2015 which does not contain data for the Southern Initiative area. © 2016 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council.
  • Coastal Map Series 3

    Coastal Map Series 3

    HEPBURN CREEK KAWAU ISLAND ALGIES BAY BEEHIVE ISLAND CHALLENGER ISLAND MOTUKETEKETE ISLAND MOTUREKAREKA ISLAND PUKAPUKA MOTUTARA ISLAND MOTUORA ISLAND MAHURANGI WEST 1 TE HAUPA ISLAND WENDERHOLM WAIWERA MAHURANGI IS OREWA WOODED ISLAND TIRITIRI MATANGI ISLAND REGIONAL PARK SILVERDALE MATAKATIA BAY BIG MANLY ARKLES BAY STILLWATER WADE HEADS 21 LONG BAY OKURA MARINE RESERVE LONG BAY REGIONAL PARK MOTUHOROPAPA ISLAND THE NOISES TORBAY DAVID ROCKS OTATA ISLAND RAKINO IS. ZENO ROCK BROWNS BAY MARIA ISLAND ALBANY THE NOISES HORUHORU ROCK MURRAYS BAY 173(Gannet Rock) MAIRANGI BAY MOTUTAPU ISLAND MILFORD TARAHIKI IS TAKAPUNA RANGITOTO ISLAND ONEROA PALM BEACH (Shag Is) BEACH HAVEN BLACKPOOL 115 SURFDALE ONETANGI PAKATOA ISLAND 167 OSTENDWAIHEKE ISLAND 94 WAIHEKE ISLAND NORTHCOTE 168 FRENCHMANS CAP DOMAIN BAYSWATER MOTUIHE IS. 169 42 PAPAKOHATU IS 89OMIHA ROTOROA (Crusoe Is) 106 ISLAND 41 DEVONPORTHEAD 170 46 64 BROWNS IS. 172 (Motukorea) 44 HERNE BAY 66 KOHIMARAMA 172 ST HELIERS AUCKLAND ORAKEI PT. CHEVALIER DOMAIN GLENDOWIE TAHUNA BEACH WATERVIEW GLEN INNES PONUI ISLAND REMUERA 74 MOTUKARAKA IS (Chamberlins Is) PARKMARAETAI BEACHLANDS FARM COVE PANMURE HOWICK PANMURE BASIN BEACHLANDS PAKIHI ISLAND MT WELLINGTON DUDER PARK 126 PAKURANGA ONEHUNGA BLOCKHOUSE BAY 130 176 NIMT AMBURY REGIONAL PARK 174 OTAHUHU EAST TAMAKI WHITFORD 175 REGIONAL MANGERE SEWAGE PARK KAWAKAWA BAY PUKETUTU ISLAND MANGERE ORERE POINT ORERE TAPAPAKANGA REGIONAL PARK CLEVEDON PUHINUI MATINGARAHI WIROA IS. MANUREWA MANUKAU HARBOUR WEYMOUTH TAKANINI WAHARAU 177 WATTLE DOWNSCONIFER GROVE REGIONAL PARK PAPAKURA WHAREKAWA HUNUA RANGES REGIONAL PARK 178 ELLETS BEACH SEAGROVE 179 KARAKA 180 DRURY KAIAUA KINGSEAT CLARKS BEACH WAIAU PA GLENBROOK BEACH.
  • Cultural Value Assessment

    Cultural Value Assessment

    CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT BY TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA for DRURY PLAN CHANGES Copyright © 2019 Te Ākitai Waiohua - The information contained in this document is to remain confidential and is supplied only for the purposes of the specified project. It is not to be disclosed to any third party for purposes outside of the specified project without the express permission of Te Ākitai Waiohua. Table of Contents TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA STRUCTURE ..................................................................................... 3 PRINCIPLES OF THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................. 4 KAITIAKITANGA .................................................................................................................... 4 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT ........................................................................................ 6 PRINCIPLES OF THE TREATY OF WAITANGI .................................................................... 7 CULTURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 8 PRINCIPLES OF CONSULTATION ....................................................................................... 8 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA GENEALOGY .................................................................................... 9 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA TIMELINE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 10 TE ĀKITAI WAIOHUA HISTORICAL SUMMARY ................................................................ 13 DRURY PLAN CHANGES...................................................................................................
  • Statement of Evidence of Ngarimu Alan Huiroa Blair on Behalf of the Plaintiff

    Statement of Evidence of Ngarimu Alan Huiroa Blair on Behalf of the Plaintiff

    In the High Court of New Zealand Auckland Registry I Te Kōti Matua O Aotearoa Tāmaki Makaurau Rohe CIV-2015-404-2033 under: the Judicature Amendment Act 1972, and Part 30 of the High Court Rules between: Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust Plaintiff and: Attorney-General First Defendant and: Marutūāhu Rōpū Limited Partnership Second Defendant and: Te Ara Rangatū O Te Iwi O Ngāti Te Ata Waiōhua Incorporated Third Defendant Statement of evidence of Ngarimu Alan Huiroa Blair on behalf of the plaintiff Dated: 2 June 2021 Next Event Date: For trial, 9 February 2021 REFERENCE: J W J Graham ([email protected])/L L Fraser ([email protected]) R M A Jones ([email protected]) COUNSEL: J E Hodder QC ([email protected]) 1 STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF NGARIMU ALAN HUIROA BLAIR ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF Table of contents INTRODUCTION 3 I. A BRIEF HISTORY OF NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI AND ITS ROHE 5 Background 5 Take raupatu 7 Whakapapa 11 Ahi kā 12 Working the land and sea – ahi kā 13 Other iwi within the Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei rohe 15 Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei at 1840 17 The 1840 Transfer Land tuku 20 II. THE TREATY SETTLEMENT PROCESS 23 The Ōrākei Block (Vesting and Use) Act 1978 23 The 1987 Ōrākei Report (WAI 9) and the Ōrākei Act 1991 23 The Surplus Railway Land 25 Towards a comprehensive Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei settlement 26 Negotiations begin in 2003 27 Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei and cross-claimants 33 Negotiating history 35 Concluding an Agreement in Principle 36 Cross-claimants’ challenge in the Waitangi Tribunal 43 The Crown reviews the Red Book 50 Treaty settlements in Auckland restarted 52 The Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Claims Settlement Act 2012 55 The “Tāmaki Collective” 59 Formation of the Tāmaki Collective 59 Function of the Tāmaki Collective 62 III.
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard

    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard

    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
  • Waitangi Tribunal Manukau Report (1985)

    Waitangi Tribunal Manukau Report (1985)

    MANUKAU REPORT WAI 8 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1985 W AITANGI TRIBUNAL LIBRARY REPORT OF THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL ON THE MANUKAU CLAIM (WAI-8) WAITANGI TRIBUNAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WELLINGTON NEW ZEALAND July 1985 Original cover design by Cliff Whiting, invoking the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent development of Maori-Pakeha history interwoven in Aotearoa, in a pattern not yet completely known, still unfolding. National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Manukau claim (Wai 8). 2nd ed. Wellington , N.Z.: The Tribunal, 1989. 1 v. (Waitangi Tribunal reports, 0113-4124) "July 1985." First ed. published in 1985 as: Finding of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Manukau claim. ISBN 0-908810-06-7 1. Manukau Harbour (N.Z.)--Water-rights. 2. Maoris--Land tenure. 3. Waitangi, Treaty of, 1840. I. Title. II. Series: Waitangi Tribunal reports; 333.91170993111 First published 1985 by the Government Printer Wellington, New Zealand Second edition published 1989 by the Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington, New Zealand Crown copyright reserved Waitangi Tribunal Reports ISSN 0113-4124 Manukau Report (Wai-8) ISBN 0-908810-06-7 Typeset, printed and bound by the Government Printing Office Wellington, New Zealand ii NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE WAI-8 BEFORE 9.30 P.M. TUESDAY, 30 JULY 1985 IN THE MATTER of a Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 IN THE MATTER of a claim by NGANEKO MINHINNICK and Te Puaha ki Manuka concerning Manukau Harbour and environs FINDING OF THE
  • Volcanic Viewshafts District Plan Changes

    Volcanic Viewshafts District Plan Changes

    Volcanic Viewshafts District Plan Changes Submission Decision requested Submitter Name Summary Part 1/1 1.1 Amend Gaynor Revill Generally supports the plan change and seeks the following amendments. Where defined viewshafts overlay zones where the permitted height exceeds the height allowed by the viewshaft; the viewshaft height should be clearly marked, and allocated immutable priority in design analysis and any hearing decision. 2/1 1.1 Amend Martin Lester Dickson I support the designated view cones to Rangitoto and Devonport mountains in the plan, indeed, I think there need to be more from East Coast Road to Rangitoto. 3/1 1.1 Amend Attn: Evan Keating (Auckland That council approve the plan change subject to the plan being amended Transport to exclude AT structures within the road reserve from the viewshaft control. Also requests that consideration be given to removing the viewshaft control from AT structures outside the road reserve. 4/1 1.1 Amend Nick Sutton Amend the plan change to offer greater/wider protection of the views of both Mount Victoria and North Head from the unique vantage point of Ngataringa Road. Amend the plan change by inserting a new viewshaft from Ngataringa Road towards Mount Victoria and North Head. 5/1 2.1 Amend Matthew Chipper Amend the boundary of the viewshaft so that 12A Church Street, Devonport is not included within the proposed volcanic view shaft zone. Submission Decision requested Submitter Name Summary Part 6/1 2.1 Amend Filipa Chipper Amend the plan to enable height restrictions to be determined by precedent / the highest building within view of the suburb for additions / alterations and developments to existing structures / buildings that are in keeping with the historical significance of the area.
  • Maori Gardening: an Archaeological Perspective

    Maori Gardening: an Archaeological Perspective

    Maori gardening An archaeological perspective Louise Furey Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10–420 Wellington, New Zealand Cover: Pa, stone row enclosures and puke (garden mounds) at Waikekeno, Wairarapa. Photo: Kevin L. Jones, DOC. © Copyright October 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 0–478–14122–X This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing by Lynette Clelland and Amanda Todd, and layout by Amanda Todd. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Maori cultigens 10 2.1 Kumara 10 2.2 Taro 13 2.3 Yam 14 2.4 Gourd 14 2.5 Ti pore 15 2.6 Aute 16 3. Gardening techniques 17 3.1 Garden location 17 3.2 Garden size 17 3.3 Fallowing 18 3.4 Garden preparation 18 3.5 Soil additives 19 4. Limitations to growth of Maori cultigens 20 5. Archaeological evidence of Maori gardening 23 5.1 Stone structures 24 5.1.1 Stone walls and rows 24 5.1.2 Stone alignments 31 5.1.3 Stone heaps 31 5.1.4 Stone mounds 31 5.1.5 Stone facing 34 5.2 Ditches and trenches 34 5.2.1 Steep-slope trenches 36 5.2.2 Trenches on gentle slopes 38 5.2.3 Trench boundary divisions 39 5.2.4 Wetland ditches 40 5.3 Borrow pits 44 5.4 Garden soils 46 5.5 Garden terraces 52 6.
  • List of Participating Retailers for the Disney Book Promotionr

    List of Participating Retailers for the Disney Book Promotionr

    Company Name TYPE Add 1 Add 2 Add 3 Add 4 Hikurangi Foodmarket Four Square Ruatoria 4 Square 179 Main Road Ruatoria BP Connect Ngaruawahia BP 159 Great South Road Ngaruawahia Waterfront Dairy Dairy 76 Marsden Road Paihia National Park Service Station Petrol (Independent) 47 State Highway 4 National Park Village Dairy Flat Food Mart Dairy 1441 State Highway 17 Albany Coatesville Store Store (General) 308 Coatesville-Riverhead Highway Albany 4 Square Ellerslie 4 Square 126Main Highway Ellerslie Auckland Alberton Fine Foods Four Square 4 Square 1 Alberton Avenue Mount Albert Auckland Bakers Delight Point Chevalier Bakery 1104 Great North Road Point Chevalier Auckland Breadcrumb Bakery Bakery 8 C Queen Street Waiuku Auckland Champion Bakehouse Bakery 103Dominion Road Mount Eden Auckland Corner Bakery Bakery 180A Hillsborough Road Hillsborough Auckland Deli Bake Bakery 238Ponsonby Road Ponsonby Auckland Hi Rise Bakery Bakery 164Kepa Road Orakei Auckland Hollywood Bakery Bakery 1784 Great North Road Avondale Auckland Meadowbank Bakery Bakery 2 St Johns Road Saint Johns Auckland Olympic Bakery & Cafe Bakery 27E Wolverton Street Avondale Auckland Onehunga Bakery Bakery 128Onehunga Mall Onehunga Auckland Pandoro Pannetteria Bakery 215 Kepa Road Mission Bay Auckland Panmure Bakehouse Bakery 12Pilkington Road Panmure Auckland The Baker's Cottage Ltd Bakery 2 New Bond Street Kingsland Auckland Top Well Bakery Bakery 558 Blockhouse Bay Road Blockhouse Bay Auckland Book Clearance Books 151Arthur Street Onehunga Auckland Book N Hair Books 268Penrose
  • Annexure a to Procedural Minute 6

    Annexure a to Procedural Minute 6

    Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Appendix 3.1 Schedule for the Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Owner/ Approral/ Sub#/ Point Name Theme Topic Subtopic Summary Submission Type Support Evidence Comentary Investigate 81 Mt Royal Rd, Mt Albert, and all other lava cave Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the entrances, for inclusion in the SEA schedule [Note - relates to Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features ONFs. Refer to Albert-Eden Local Board Views, Volume 26, page 5716-3481 Auckland Council Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add 30/103]. Local Government no iv Investigate the 'Spring', located under Crystal Motors at 11 Ruru Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the St, Eden Terrace, for inclusion in the SEA schedule [Note - Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features relates to ONFs. Refer to Albert-Eden Local Board Views, Volume 5716-3482 Auckland Council Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add 26, page 30/103]. Local Government no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Include volcanic features in former outlying district such as Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Franklin within the PAUP including Pukekohe Hill, Puni Mountain, 4485-11 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add Pukekohe East crater. Key Stakeholder no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Include Pukekohe Hill and Puni Mountain as outstanding natural 4485-13 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add features. Key Stakeholder no iv Auckland Volcanic Appendix 3.1 - Schedule for the Cones Society Outstanding Natural Outstanding Natural Features Apply V1 and V2 overlays to volcanic reserves and surrounding 4485-21 Incorporated Features (ONF) Rules Overlay Add Includeareas.
  • Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

    Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

    Volcanic Viewshafts and height sensitive areas rules - Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts survey coordinates Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested Sub#/ Point Name Theme Topic Subtopic Summary Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-20 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Protect views between Maunga. Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-152 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Retain all the viewshafts listed Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-153 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add additional viewshafts which protect iconic explosion craters Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-154 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add viewshaft to protect views to Panmure Basin from the top of Mt Wellington Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-155 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add viewshaft to protect views to Orakei Basin from Kepa Road Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-156 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add viewshaft to protect views to Orakei Basin from Upland Road crest. Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-157 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add viewshaft to protect views to Rangitoto from Lucerne Road, Remuera Volcanic Viewshafts and height Appendix 3.3 - Volcanic view shafts 93-158 Geoscience Society of New Zealand sensitive areas rules survey coordinates Add viewshaft to protect views to Mt Wellington from Lunn Ave-Abbotts Way intersection.