DOCSLIB.ORG

Download 710.92 KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download 710.92 KB ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK PCR: PAK 17044 PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT ON THE PAT FEEDER CANAL REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (Loan 772-PAK [SF]) IN PAKISTAN December 2004 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – Pakistan rupee/s (Pre/PRs) At Appraisal At Project Completion 31 October 1985 3 April 2000 PRe1.00 = $0.0625 $0.01927 $1.00 = PRs15.9878 PRs51.90 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BAD – Balochistan Agriculture Department BIPD – Balochistan Irrigation and Power Department c3/sec – cubic meters per second DOA – Department of Agriculture EIRR – economic internal rate of return GOB – Government of Balochistan ha – hectare IFAD – International Fund for Agriculture Development IPD – Irrigation and Power Department km – kilometer mm – millimeter NDSP – Natural Drainage Sector Project JBIC - Japan Bank for International Cooperation O&M – operation and maintenance OFWM – on-farm water management PBME – project benefit monitoring and evaluation PCR – project completion report PFCADP – Pat Feeder Command Area Development Project pm – person-month PMO – project management organization PSC – project steering committee RD – reduced distance (for indicating canal station number) WAPDA – Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 cubic meter per second (c3/sec) – 35.3 cubic feet per second (ft3/sec) 1 hectare (ha) – 2.471 acres (ac) 1 reduced distance (RD) – 1,000 feet GLOSSARY Abiana – Local term for water changes Kharif – The hot (summer) cropping season (April–September) Rabi – The cold (winter) cropping season (October–March) NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 June. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2000 ends on 30 June 2000. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i MAP vii I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 3 B. Project Outputs 4 C. Project Costs and Financing 5 D. Disbursements 6 E. Project Schedule 6 F. Implementation Arrangements 7 G. Conditions and Covenants 7 H. Consultant Recruitment and Procurement 7 I. Performance of Consultants, Contractors, and Suppliers 8 J. Performance of the Borrower and the Executing Agency 9 K. Performance of the Asian Development Bank 9 III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE A. Relevance 10 B. Efficacy in Achievement of Purpose 10 C. Efficiency in Achievement of Outputs and Purpose 10 D. Preliminary Assessment of Sustainability 11 E. Environmental, Sociocultural, and Other Impacts 13 IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Overall Assessment 14 B. Lessons Learned 14 C. Recommendations 15 APPENDIXES 1. Project Outputs 17 2. Implementation Schedule 21 3. Status of Compliance with Loan covenants 22 4. Economic Analysis 30 5. Status of Operation and Maintenance of Completed Works 48 and Cost Recovery 6. Salient Features of Water Apportionment Accord and 51 Water Utilization in Balochistan 7. Pat Feeder Command Area Development Project 53 BASIC DATA A. Loan Identification 1. Country Pakistan 2. Loan Number 772-PAK(SF) 3. Project Title Pat Feeder Canal Rehabilitation and Improvement Project 4. Borrower Islamic Republic of Pakistan 5. Executing Agencies Water and Power Development Authority; Irrigation and Power Department, Balochistan; Department of Agriculture, Balochistan 6. Amount of Loan SDR 118.676 million 7. Project Completion Report PCR: PAK 871 Number B. Loan Data 1. Appraisal – Date Started 13 July 1985 – Date Completed 2 August 1985 2. Loan Negotiations – Date Started 15 November 1985 – Date Completed 21 November 1985 3. Date of Board Approval 17 December 1985 4. Date of Loan Agreement 17 January 1986 5. Date of Loan Effectiveness – In Loan Agreement 16 April 1986 – Actual 9 June 1987 – Number of Extensions 5 6. Closing Date – In Loan Agreement 31 December 1993 – Actual 3 April 2000 – Number of Extensions 4 7. Terms of Loan – Interest Rate 1% service charge – Maturity 40 years – Grace Period 10 years ii 8. Disbursements a. Dates Initial Disbursement Final Disbursement Time Interval 9 June 1987 3 April 2000 153 months Effective Date Original Closing Date Time Interval 9 June 1987 31 December 1993 78 months b. Amount ($ million) Last Net Category or Original Amount Amount Undisbursed Revised Amount Subloan Allocation Canceled Disbursed Balance Allocation Available 01A - Civil Works 26.52 96.69 (70.17) 117.94 113.24 4.70 for Part A.1 to 5 01B - Civil Works 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 for Part A.2 to 4 01C - Civil Works 41.63 22.35 19.28 19.06 19.21 (0.16) for Part C 01D - Civil Works 3.19 4.21 (1.02) 2.66 2.67 (0.01) for Part D 02 - OFWM 4.80 0.00 4.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Materials 03 - Drainage 0.34 0.10 0.24 0.10 0.10 0.01 Investigations for Part C 04 - Soil Survey for 0.01 0.03 (0.02) 0.03 0.03 0.00 Part C 05 - Consulting 4.82 13.15 (8.66) 15.29 13.57 1.72 Services for Part E 06 – Training for 0.10 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.00 Part E 07G - Local Exp.- 10.13 6.24 3.89 8.09 8.58 (0.49) Domestic Consulting Services for PBME for Part E 07I - Local Exp.- 0.29 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.09 PBME for Part E 08 - Service 3.37 6.67 (3.31) 4.58 4.60 (0.02) Charge During Construction 09 - Prior Technical 0.07 0.08 (0.01) 0.09 0.08 0.01 Assistance Unallocated 21.73 3.80 18.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 117.00 153.48 (36.48) 168.00 162.15 5.85 OFWM = on-farm water management, PBME = project benefit monitoring and evaluation. iii 9. Local Costs (Financed) – Amount ($ million) 59.37 –% of Local Costs 47.37 –% of Total Cost 25.44 C. Project Data 1. Project Cost ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimate Revised Estimate Actual Foreign Exchange Cost 94.70 133.60 108.08 Local Currency Cost 87.60 110.35 125.34 Total 182.30 243.95 233.42 2. Financing Plan ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual Implementation Costs Borrower-Financed 35.30 65.20 ADB-Financed 117.00 157.55 Other External Financing-JBIC 30.00 5.30 Subtotal 182.30 228.05 IDC Costs Borrower-Financed 0.00 0.77 ADB-Financed 0.00 4.60 Other External Financing 0.00 0.00 Total 182.30 233.42 ADB = Asian Development Bank, IDC = interest during construction, JBIC = Japan Bank for International Cooperation. 3. Cost Breakdown by Project Components ($ million) Component Appraisal Estimate Reformulated 1993 Actual A. Mapping 4.06 1.90 1.57 B. Soil Survey 0.10 0.07 0.03 C. Drainage Investigations 0.32 0.09 0.10 D. Civil Works 1. Main Canal 29.71 81.98 86.58 2. Flood Protection 1.83 0.00 0.00 3. Distributary Canals 4.22 31.28 24.63 4. Minor Canals 5.35 21.84 25.59 5. Surface Drainage 15.70 17.39 20.58 6. Subsurface Drainage 26.60 12.96 0.00 7. BIPD Infrastructure 2.60 1.91 3.14 8. Marketing Facilities 0.70 1.00 Included in D7 9. WAPDA Facilities 2.00 2.12 5.58 10. BAD Housing 0.70 0.85 Included in D7 E. OFWM Materials 3.20 2.25 3.22 F. Vehicles and Equipment 3.43 5.00 9.59 Continued on next page iv Cost Breakdown by Project Components – Continued Component Appraisal Estimate Reformulated 1993 Actual G. Design and Construction 7.50 6.24 11.12 Supervision H. Consulting Services and 4.50 13.25 16.50 Training I. Project Benefit Monitoring & 0.20 0.15 0.06 Evaluation J. Land Acquisition 5.75 8.94 13.91 K. Project Administration 5.79 1. OFWM 1.13 0.96 Combined in K 2. BIPD 0.53 1.34 Combined in K 3. BAD 0.58 0.85 Combined in K Total Base Cost 119.60 212.35 227.970 L. Physical Contingencies 10.44 8.77 0.00 M. Escalation 45.83 15.31 0.00 N. Prior Technical Assistance 0.07 0.08 0.08 Cost Interest During Construction 3.37 6.67 4.60 Interest on JBIC Credit 3.01 0.77 0.77 Total 182.30 243.95 233.42 BAD = Balochistan Agriculture Department, BIPD = Balochistan Irrigation and Power Department, JBIC = Japan Bank of International Cooperation, OFWM = on-farm water management, WAPDA = Water and Power Development Authority. 4. Project Schedule Item Appraisal Estimate Actual Date of Contract with Consultants 6 November 1986 13 March 1988 Completion of Engineering Designs December 1989 December 1995 Civil Works Contract Date of Award July 1987 September 1990 Completion of Work December 1992 May 1998 Equipment and Supplies — 23 January 1990 Completion of Tests and Commissioning 1992 1998 5. Project Performance Report Ratings Ratings Implementation Period Development Implementation Objectives Progress From 9 June 1987 to December 1989 S U From 1 January 1989 to 31 December 1989 S S From 1 January 1990 to 31 December 1990 S S From 1 January 1991 to 31 December 1991 S S Continued on next page v Project Performance Report Ratings – Continued Ratings Implementation Period Development Implementation Objectives Progress From 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1992 S S From 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1993 S S From 1 January 1994 to 31 December 1994 S S From 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1995 S S From 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1996 S S From 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1997 S S From 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1998 S S From 1 January 1999 to 31 December 1999 S U From 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2000 S U S = satisfactory, U = unsatisfactory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PAKISTAN: FLOODS/RAINS 2012 Series No. 4 RAPID
    Pakistan Floods / Rains 2012: Rapid Crop Damage Assessment: Series No. 4 PAKISTAN: FLOODS/RAINS 2012 Series No. 4 RAPID CROP DAMAGE ASSESSMENT October 30, 2012 Pakistan Space & Food and Agriculture Upper Atmosphere Organization of the Research Commission United Nations Pakistan Floods / Rains 2012: Rapid Crop Damage Assessment: Series No. 4 ISBN : 978-969-9102-11-0 Pakistan Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission SPARC, Islamabad Phone: 051-9273312, 051-4611792 e-mail:[email protected], Website: www.suparco.gov.pk Pakistan Floods / Rains 2012: Rapid Crop Damage Assessment: Series No. 4 Foreword Pakistan faced floods and tormenting rains during the last three consecutive monsoons from 2010 to 2012. During these floods, the ground communication systems were generally disrupted and information on flood extent and damage through ground reporting services was not available for taking timely decisions. To address the situation and to ensure continuous provision of current and timely information to the concerned stakeholder’s and decision makers satellite remote sensing and GIS technologies were extensively utilized. SUPARCO in collaboration with FAO started generating data on daily basis on flood extent, damage to households, infrastructure and crops besides undertaking detailed Damage Need Assessment (DNA). This fast track supply of information made it possible to reach out to affected and displaced masses for supply of food, medical care, relief, rehabilitation and follow up programs. In the aftermath of floods, monitoring of flood recession and ponding of water in the affected areas on decadal basis was also carried out for several months. All of this work was published by SUPARCO-FAO jointly in three reports (Reports 1 to 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Sohbat Pur District Education Plan (2016-17 to 2020-21)
    Sohbat Pur District Education Plan (2016-17 to 2020-21) Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS 1 LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF TABLES 3 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 METHODOLOGY & PROCESS 7 2.1 METHODOLOGY 7 2.1.2 CONSULTATIONS 7 2.1.3 STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVEMENT 7 2.2 PROCESS FOR DEPS DEVELOPMENT: 8 2.2.1 SECTOR ANALYSIS: 8 2.2.2 IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF STRATEGIES: 9 2.2.3 FINALIZATION OF DISTRICT PLANS: 9 3 SOHBAT PUR DISTRICT PROFILE 10 3.1 POPULATION 11 3.2 ECONOMIC ENDOWMENTS 11 3.3 POVERTY & CHILD LABOR: 11 3.4 STATE OF EDUCATION 12 4 ACCESS & EQUITY 13 4.1 EQUITY AND INCLUSIVENESS 18 4.2 IMPORTANT FACTORS 19 4.2.1 SCHOOL AVAILABILITY AND UTILIZATION 19 4.2.2 MISSING FACILITIES AND SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT 20 4.2.3 POVERTY 20 4.2.4 PARENT’S ILLITERACY 21 4.2.5 ALTERNATE LEARNING PATHWAYS 21 4.3 OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES 22 5 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 26 5.1 OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES 27 6 QUALITY AND RELEVANCE OF EDUCATION 28 6.1 SITUATION 28 6.2 DISTRICT LIMITATIONS AND STRENGTHS 29 6.3 OVERARCHING FACTORS FOR POOR EDUCATION 31 6.4 DISTRICT RELATED FACTORS OF POOR QUALITY 32 6.4.1 OWNERSHIP OF QUALITY IN EDUCATION 32 6.4.2 CAPACITY OF FIELD TEAMS 32 6.4.3 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL OF HEAD TEACHERS 32 6.4.4 NO DATA COMPILATION AND FEEDBACK 32 6.4.5 CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION AND FEEDBACK 33 6.4.6 TEXTBOOKS DISTRIBUTION AND FEEDBACK 33 6.4.7 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 33 6.4.8 TEACHERS AVAILABILITY 34 6.4.9 ASSESSMENTS 34 6.4.10 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION (ECE) 34 6.4.11 AVAILABILITY AND USE OF LIBRARIES & LABORATORIES 34 6.4.12 SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT 35 6.5 OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]
  • Balochistan Province Report on Mouza Census 2008
    TABLE 1 NUMBER OF KANUNGO CIRCLES,PATWAR CIRCLES AND MOUZAS WITH STATUS NUMBER OF NUMBER OF MOUZAS KANUNGO CIRCLES/ PATWAR ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT PARTLY UN- SUPER- CIRCLES/ TOTAL RURAL URBAN FOREST URBAN POPULATED VISORY TAPAS TAPAS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BALOCHISTAN 179 381 7480 6338 127 90 30 895 QUETTA DISTRICT 5 12 65 38 15 10 1 1 QUETTA CITY TEHSIL 2 6 23 7 9 7 - - QUETTA SADDAR TEHSIL 2 5 38 27 6 3 1 1 PANJPAI TEHSIL 1 1 4 4 - - - - PISHIN DISTRICT 6 17 392 340 10 3 8 31 PISHIN TEHSIL 3 6 47 39 2 1 - 5 KAREZAT TEHSIL 1 3 39 37 - 1 - 1 HURAM ZAI TEHSIL 1 4 16 15 - 1 - - BARSHORE TEHSIL 1 4 290 249 8 - 8 25 KILLA ABDULLAH DISTRICT 4 10 102 95 2 2 - 3 GULISTAN TEHSIL 1 2 10 8 - - - 2 KILLA ABDULLAH TEHSIL 1 3 13 12 1 - - - CHAMAN TEHSIL 1 2 31 28 1 2 - - DOBANDI SUB-TEHSIL 1 3 48 47 - - - 1 NUSHKI DISTRICT 2 3 45 31 1 5 - 8 NUSHKI TEHSIL 1 2 26 20 1 5 - - DAK SUB-TEHSIL 1 1 19 11 - - - 8 CHAGAI DISTRICT 4 6 48 41 1 4 - 2 DALBANDIN TEHSIL 1 3 30 25 1 3 - 1 NOKUNDI TEHSIL 1 1 6 5 - - - 1 TAFTAN TEHSIL 1 1 2 1 - 1 - - CHAGAI SUB-TEHSIL 1 1 10 10 - - - - SIBI DISTRICT 6 15 161 124 7 1 6 23 SIBI TEHSIL 2 5 35 31 1 - - 3 KUTMANDAI SUB-TEHSIL 1 2 8 8 - - - - SANGAN SUB-TEHSIL 1 2 3 3 - - - - LEHRI TEHSIL 2 6 115 82 6 1 6 20 HARNAI DISTRICT 3 5 95 81 3 3 - 8 HARNAI TEHSIL 1 3 64 55 1 1 - 7 SHARIGH TEHSIL 1 1 16 12 2 1 - 1 KHOAST SUB-TEHSIL 1 1 15 14 - 1 - - KOHLU DISTRICT 6 18 198 195 3 - - - KOHLU TEHSIL 1 2 37 35 2 - - - MEWAND TEHSIL 1 5 38 37 1 - - - KAHAN TEHSIL 4 11 123 123 - - - - DERA BUGTI DISTRICT 9 17 224 215 4 1 - 4 DERA BUGTI TEHSIL 1
    [Show full text]
  • Balochistan Province Reportlivestock Census 2006
    TABLE 1. LIVESTOCK POPULATION AND DOMESTIC POULTRY BIRDS BY ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NUMBER OF ANIMALS / POULTRY BIRDS ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CATTLE BUFFALOES SHEEP GOATS CAMELS HORSES MULES ASSES POULTRY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BALOCHISTAN PROVINCE 2253581 319854 12804217 11784711 379528 59973 6256 471942 5911304 QUETTA DISTRICT 11244 25547 163799 120384 1377 297 106 3468 128331 PISHIN DISTRICT 91433 994 837233 504510 745 3343 467 21220 531751 KILLA ABDULLAH DISTRICT 53111 479 325020 115405 359 690 151 4008 291710 CHAGAI DISTRICT 6576 20 205725 299363 17543 100 83 4124 92931 SIBI DISTRICT 54709 6133 200946 208133 1866 2776 52 10473 254604 KOHLU DISTRICT 174167 1463 1306734 813575 58318 15755 2 53365 172462 DERA BUGTI DISTRICT 144860 6795 506095 775361 35573 11812 64 25135 185429 ZIARAT DISTRICT 1929 12 120054 138440 34 13 5 1029 50399 LORALAI DISTRICT 131806 4628 784961 331737 716 943 248 9150 252903 MUSA KHEL DISTRICT 197318 1650 977748 464126 17639 3588 96 21226 227770 BARKHAN DISTRICT 117286 2005 413840 155581 3930 2127 150 9507 155917 KILLA SAIFULLAH DISTRICT 69361 151 1066690 783624 21751 1359 270 21248 274313 ZHOB DISTRICT 178658 5524 1174735 875922 1010 370 168 18351 229782 JAFARABAD DISTRICT 268721 156427 241444 283922 8252 2929 2518 52713 507275 NASEERABAD DISTRICT 165765 84226 148501 213294 1871 1576 233 22848 292209 BOLAN DISTRICT 151736 4151 124569 766109 34401 4915 149 36325 352580 JHAL MAGSI DISTRICT 78294 4275 61295 298687 3898 3613 - 13703 157762 LASBELLA DISTRICT 101084 7980 367262 794296 32202 1857 581 26535 226710 MASTUNG DISTRICT 8628 456 466894 334906 2802 85 121 6770 218682 KALAT DISTRICT 31896 592 1239499 807608 10264 511 143 22370 331981 KHUZDAR DISTRICT 103375 5782 1105410 1036004 28006 832 185 46523 336416 AWARAN DISTRICT 18485 40 125772 344318 5335 59 20 6491 111486 KHARAN DISTRICT 14854 118 665903 635731 76069 138 8 11862 202230 KECH (TURBAT) DISTRICT 43433 306 64693 455391 6061 178 410 11060 208746 GAWADAR DISTRICT 12344 51 18363 88901 1432 12 18 4052 52893 PANJGUR DISTRICT 22508 49 91032 139383 8074 95 8 8386 64032 TABLE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16633 Implementation Status & Results Pakistan Pakistan: Promoting Girls' Education in Balochistan (PGEB) (P128096) Operation Name: Pakistan: Promoting Girls' Education in Balochistan (PGEB) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 4 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 11-Nov-2014 (P128096) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Pakistan Approval FY: 2013 Product Line:Recipient Executed Activities Region: SOUTH ASIA Lending Instrument: Emergency Recovery Loan Implementing Agency(ies): PMU PGEB Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 21-Aug-2012 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Planned Mid Term Review Date Last Archived ISR Date 24-Apr-2014 Effectiveness Date 12-Sep-2012 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objective of the Project is to improve access to education and retention of children in schools, with a special emphasis on girls, in the province of Balochistan. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost A - Construction of building facilities for shelter-less girls schools (primary and middle) 5.00 B - Provision of missing facilities to girls’ schools 2.00 C -Establishment of new Government primary schools with community participation 1.60 D -Technical Assistance to the Education Department for implementation and monitoring at the 1.40 district level Overall
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Protection Assessment Report Pakistan Floods 2011
    Rapid Protection Assessment Report Pakistan Floods 2011 Protection Thematic Working Group 5 - 11 October 2011 Balochistan Province, Pakistan 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 II. Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………9 III. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 10 Timeframe and Staffing.............................................................................................. 10 Geographic Scope and Site Selection.................................................................... 11 Population assessed and Data Collection.............................................................. 13 Community buy in, consultations and relevant assurances................................. 15 Questionnaire .............................................................................................................. 16 Data Management .................................................................................................... 16 Constraints ................................................................................................................... 16 IV. Identified Protection Concerns ............................................................................... 18 1. Access to Assistance.............................................................................................. 18 2. Safety and Security................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bomb Blasts in Pakistan, 2011
    Bomb Blasts in Pakistan, 2011 Date Place Samar Bagh / Timergara /Lower Dir / 1 January 2 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ali Masjid / Landikotal / Khyber Agency 2 January 3 / FATA 3 January 4 Turbat / Balochistan 4 January 5 Badragai / Shakai / SWA / FATA Hassan Garhi / Peshawar / Khyber 5 January 6 Pakhtunkhwa 6 January 6 Sariab / Quetta / Balochistan Doozakh Market / Charsadda / Khyber 7 January 7 Pakhtunkhwa Qandharo / Safi / Mohmand Agency / 8 January 8 FATA Mahmadghat / Mohmand Agency / 9 January 8 FATA Khan Banda / Mian Issa / Charsadda / 10 January 8 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 11 January 9 Dera Bugti / Balochistan Merikhel / Landikotal / Khyber Agency / 12 January 10 FATA Mathakhel / Landikotal / Khyber Agency 13 January 10 / FATA 14 January 10 Pishtakhara / Peshawar / KP 15 January 11 Loti / Dera Bugti / Balochistan Katkot / Loe Mamond / Bajaur Agency / 16 January 11 FATA 17 January 12 Miryan / Bannu / KP 18 January 12 Peshawar Suburb / KP 19 January 12 Matani / Peshawar / KP Sarokai / Wana-Jandola Road / SWA / 20 January 12 FATA Qambarkhel / Bara / Khyber Agency / 21 January 13 FATA 22 January 13 Sardikhel / Bannu / KP 23 January 13 Loti / Dera Bugti / Balochistan 24 January 13 Dera Allah Yar / Jaffarabad / Balochistan 25 January 14 Baizai / Mohmand Agency / FATA Bugti Colony / Sui / Dera Bugti / 26 January 14 Balochistan 27 January 14 Uch Gas / Dera Bugti / Balochistan 28 January 15 Mamozai / Orakzai Agency / FATA 29 January 16 Razmak / NWA / FATA 30 January 16 Adezai / Mohammad Agency / FATA 31 January 16 Loti / Dera Bugti / Balochistan 32 January
    [Show full text]
  • Province Wise Provisional Results of Census - 2017
    PROVINCE WISE PROVISIONAL RESULTS OF CENSUS - 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS POPULATION 2017 POPULATION 1998 PAKISTAN 207,774,520 132,352,279 KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 30,523,371 17,743,645 FATA 5,001,676 3,176,331 PUNJAB 110,012,442 73,621,290 SINDH 47,886,051 30,439,893 BALOCHISTAN 12,344,408 6,565,885 ISLAMABAD 2,006,572 805,235 Note:- 1. Total Population includes all persons residing in the country including Afghans & other Aliens residing with the local population 2. Population does not include Afghan Refugees living in Refugee villages 1 PROVISIONAL CENSUS RESULTS -2017 KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA District Tehsil POPULATION POPULATION ADMN. UNITS / AREA Sr.No Sr.No 2017 1998 KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 30,523,371 17,743,645 MALAKAND DIVISION 7,514,694 4,262,700 1 CHITRAL DISTRICT 447,362 318,689 1 Chitral Tehsil 278,122 184,874 2 Mastuj Tehsil 169,240 133,815 2 UPPER DIR DISTRICT 946,421 514,451 3 Dir Tehsil 439,577 235,324 4 *Shringal Tehsil 185,037 104,058 5 Wari Tehsil 321,807 175,069 3 LOWER DIR DISTRICT 1,435,917 779,056 6 Temergara Tehsil 520,738 290,849 7 *Adenzai Tehsil 317,504 168,830 8 *Lal Qilla Tehsil 219,067 129,305 9 *Samarbagh (Barwa) Tehsil 378,608 190,072 4 BUNER DISTRICT 897,319 506,048 10 Daggar/Buner Tehsil 355,692 197,120 11 *Gagra Tehsil 270,467 151,877 12 *Khado Khel Tehsil 118,185 69,812 13 *Mandanr Tehsil 152,975 87,239 5 SWAT DISTRICT 2,309,570 1,257,602 14 *Babuzai Tehsil (Swat) 599,040 321,995 15 *Bari Kot Tehsil 184,000 99,975 16 *Kabal Tehsil 420,374 244,142 17 Matta Tehsil 465,996 251,368 18 *Khawaza Khela Tehsil 265,571 141,193
    [Show full text]
  • Nchr Newsletter August-December 2017
    NCHR NEWSLETTER AUGUST-DECEMBER 2017 National Commission for Human Rights 5th Floor Evacuee Trust Complex, Agha Khan Road, Islamabad NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Phone: 051-9216777, Fax: 051-9216772 PAKISTAN E-mail: [email protected], Website: nchr.org.pk AGUST-DECEMBER 2017 NEWSLETTER Chairman’s Message Pakistan is passing through a tumultuous time. In an unprecedented stage in our history we are plagued by a plethora of problems shrouding our future in an ominous cloud. Child abuse is rampant. Hate speech and extremism are festering, leading to forced conversions of minority communities in Tharparkar, Kalash, among others, and an increase in sectarian killings of Hazara Shias in Balochistan, and other religious minorities all over the country. One of the biggest challenges that Pakistan faces is enforced disappearances aimed at shutting down dissent or gaining personal leverage, with multiple accusations levied against state agencies or foreign interference. Synchronously to due process being overlooked, torture is being ignored. There exists no definition of torture in our penal code, a strict rebuke to the international treaties ratified by us. Pakistan has become a mini-killing field; it appears altruism is a victim. Though this may paint a bleak picture, we must remember that the context is unique in Pakistan’s 70 years. Civil society is more empowered than ever and fighting to hold accountable the institutions established to protect them, and the government is taking some measures to tackle these problems, with the establishment of the NCHR being one such step. NCHR is mandated to look into human rights issues faced by Pakistani citizens at home and abroad and to resolve them.
    [Show full text]
  • PTB), Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis (EPTB), World Health Organization (WHO), Directly Observed Treatment Short Course (DOTS
    International Journal of Statistics and Applications 2019, 9(6): 191-200 DOI: 10.5923/j.statistics.20190906.04 Prevalence and Statistical Analysis of Various Risk Factors of Tuberculosis in Balochistan, Pakistan Zahra Khanum1,*, Yasmin Zahra Jafri1, Azhar Marri1, Shabana Yasmeen2, Summiya Malik3, Madiha Raza4, Syed Fareed Ullah1 1Department of Statistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan 2Agricultural Research Institute, Mastung, Pakistan 3Agricultural Research Institute, Quetta, Pakistan 4Zia-ud-din Medical University, Pakistan Abstract Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading communicable disease in the world. TB is a potentially serious infection disease that mainly attack lungs. 27000 new cases have been emerging from Balochistan every year millions of people are affected and loose their lives. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and risk factors of tuberculosis patients enrolled in Provincial TB Control Program. Data are collected from health units of Quetta, Jafarabad, Gawadar, Noshki, Lasbela, and Loralai (Balochistan, Pakistan). Objective: The aim of current study was to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of tuberculosis. To see the effect of weather on tuberculosis in winter and summer. Comparative study of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB. To create awareness in people of Balochistan against tuberculosis. Methods: A cross sectional study was designed over a period of six month (Jan to June) 2016 comprises two quarters, winter and summer in six districts of Balochistan, Pakistan. The data were collected from health clinics formed of Provincial TB Control Program Balochistan. A total of 2609 patients were screened systematically and diagnoses were based on clinical examination and bacteriological test. We also made comparison between pulmonary (PTB) and extrapulmonary (EPTB) tuberculosis in six major districts of Balochistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of District Kech with Focus on Livelihood Related Issues
    Profile of district Kech with focus on livelihood related issues South Asia Partnership-Pakistan Profile of district Kech with focus on livelihood related issues Developed by Tahir Mehdi, Dr Monir Ekbal, Tauqeer Mustafa, Rashid Chaudhry, Shafiq Butt, Asif Hoat, Matloob Ali, Khalid Amin and Shoaib Tariq Published by South Asia Partnership-Pakistan Haseeb Memorial Trust Building, Nasirabad, 2 km Raiwind Road, P.O. Thokar Niaz Beg, Lahore-53700, Pakistan Ph: 92-42-35311701-3, 5-6, Fax: 92-42-35311710 Email: [email protected], Website: www.sappk.org Printed by Visionaries Division Quantity: 500 December 2009 Any part of this publication can be reproduced provided a reference is made to this original publication. I . n . t . r . o . d . u . c . t . i . o . n his publication is a result of a research exercise carried out to understand and Tdocument the current status of different ways and means of earning livelihoods in a group of selected districts of Pakistan and other factors that have an impact on people's capacity to utilize available resources and that of creating new ones. The study is a part of South Asia Partnership, Pakistan's (SAP-PK) strategy to realize its mission of creating an engendered, critical society in South Asia based on the universal principles of human dignity, justice, democracy and peaceful coexistence. As member of South Asian civil society movement, SAP-Pk is striving to empower marginalized sections of society and working to influence policies in their favor. Data for the study is collected through secondary as well as primary sources. The secondary data is mostly quoted from Population Census 1998, Agriculture Census 2000, Agriculture Machinery Contents Census 2004, Industry Census 2004, Animal Census Foreword ..
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Change: Scale and Underlying Causes
    URBAN CHANGE: SCALE AND UNDERLYING CAUSES The Case of Pakistan Text : Arif Hasan Tables : Reza Ali, Mansoor Raza, Masooma Mohib Page 1 of 160 Acknowledgements In February 1999, David Satterthwaite at the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) (UK) contacted me for preparing a study on Urban Change in Pakistan. This is one of eight studies which the European Union has funded. The study has taken three years to complete. The reason for this is that the Pakistan census data for the 1998 population and housing census was published only in October 2001, although census data for the various districts of Pakistan was available earlier. Also, it was a time consuming exercise converting the data of the various census since 1901 to the form it has in this report. However, tables, based on the districts and unpublished data, were sent to the IIED earlier this year. The detailed tables for Pakistan (unless specified otherwise at the bottom of the tables) have been prepared by Architect-Planner Reza Ali. He is currently working on a major study for the Urbanization Research Programme funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the Water and Sanitation Program-South Asia. The tables for Karachi have been prepared by Engineer Mansoor Raza and the report has been put together with the assistance of Architect Masooma Mohib and Israr Ahmad Rana. Financial support for this work has also been provided by the Asian Coalition for Housing Rights (ACHR) Bangkok. Arif Hasan September 16, 2002 Page 2 of 160 Contents The Political Importance of Urbanization in the Pakistan Context ................................................
    [Show full text]