Rapid Protection Assessment Report Pakistan Floods 2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rapid Protection Assessment Report Pakistan Floods 2011 Protection Thematic Working Group 5 - 11 October 2011 Balochistan Province, Pakistan 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 II. Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………9 III. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 10 Timeframe and Staffing.............................................................................................. 10 Geographic Scope and Site Selection.................................................................... 11 Population assessed and Data Collection.............................................................. 13 Community buy in, consultations and relevant assurances................................. 15 Questionnaire .............................................................................................................. 16 Data Management .................................................................................................... 16 Constraints ................................................................................................................... 16 IV. Identified Protection Concerns ............................................................................... 18 1. Access to Assistance.............................................................................................. 18 2. Safety and Security................................................................................................. 20 3. Women..................................................................................................................... 21 4. Children.................................................................................................................... 23 5. Age and Disability................................................................................................... 24 V. Recommendations .................................................................................................... 28 VI. Note on Inclusion of Protection in Rapid Response Plan ..................................... 31 2 List of Acronyms Abbreviation Explanations AGDM Age Gender and Diversity Mainstreaming BBSA Balochistan Boys Scouts Association BHU Basic Health Unit CBO Community Based Organization CNIC Computerized National Identity Cards CRS Catholic Relief Services DANESH Drugs and Narcosis Educational Services and Humanity DDMA District Disaster Management Authority FGD Focus Group Discussion GBV Gender Based Violence IDP Internally Displaced Person INGOs International Non-governmental Organization IRC International Rescue Committee NDMA National Disaster Management Authority NGO Non-governmental Organization PDMA Provincial Disaster Management Authority PEP Post Exposure Prophylaxis RC/ HC Resident Coordinator/ Humanitarian Coordinator RNA Rapid Needs Assessment RPA Rapid Protection Assessment SEHER Society for Empowering Human Resource SRF Standard Reporting Form TAT Technical Assistance Team UC Union Council UN United Nations UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNOCHA United Nations Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene WFP World Food program 3 Executive Summary The Rapid Protection Assessment (RPA) was undertaken from 5-11 October 2011 covering 80 “sites” 1 in 17 Tehsils across the nine most flood affected districts of Balochistan Province including (Pishin, Nasirabad, Jafarabad, Loralai, Killa Saifullah, Lasbella, Kalat, Khuzdar and Kachhi Bolan). Nearly 4000 individuals from flood affected districts participated through a total of 392 interviews (250 focus group discussions and 142 key informants’ interviews -which included community leaders/ representatives, women groups and local authorities etc). RPA was conducted by a stand-by roster of enumerators and data managers trained under the Protection Early Recovery Thematic Working Group 2 emergency preparedness plan. At the request of the government for relief assistance and technical assistance on a rapid needs assessment, the stand-by RPA roster was activated and deployed to the affected districts to collect the protection related data for 7 days. The overall goal of the RPA is to understand protection situations that flood affected populations in Balochistan are facing, with particular focus on the most vulnerable and to highlight protection gaps needed to be addressed. The RPA is also intended to incorporate key protection concerns into the flood response plan and formulate recommendations, including activation of the protection cluster and protection mainstreaming in other clusters to effectively address the expressed needs. Key Findings Lack of assistance and/or limited access to available assistance by vulnerable groups 92% of responses 3 indicated that their communities had not received assistance at all. Among those who reported that their community had received assistance, 55 indicated in the interviews that they encountered 1 Exact site names in database are not explicitly mentioned in the current report due to confidentially principles being adhered to, but such names are available in the central database and have been shared with the assessment survey committee. Such information can be further extracted based on needs/requests. 2 The Protection Thematic Working Group for the early recovery phase of 2010 floods was established in March 2011 and activated at national, provincial and district levels. The national group is co-led by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Rescue Committee (IRC). 3 In this report “a response” or “an interview” means the information shared through either a key informant or focus group Interview. For example, 92% of responses/interviews mean that 92% of 392 interviews reported that their communities had not received assistance. 4 problems of access to assistance, due to various reasons including inadequate or lack of information regarding available assistance. Respondents reported that access to services is particularly difficult for persons with specific needs, e.g. female headed households, elderly persons and persons with disabilities (physical, visual, intellectual and hearing) as well as those who do not have civil documents such as the computerized national identification cards (CNIC) have difficulties in accessing relief items. Safety and security 7% of responses indicated theft, robbery or internal-communal disputes/conflicts with nearby populations as their main safety and security concerns, in addition to other concerns. Women There is severe lack of privacy for females and lack of appropriate health facilities in the affected districts. 180 responded with privacy being their main concern. Children Respondents reported child labor one of the issues faced by the children. 25 instances of injuries have been reported for girl children while 28 for boys. 21 cases of child labour were reported for boys. Persons with disabilities ( physical, visual, intellectual and hearing) and elderly persons Respondents mentioned that persons with disabilities and elderly persons in their communities reportedly had problems such as lack of assistance in all districts, discrimination to access basic services, loss of mobility aids/assistive devices and access to specialized services. 65% of interviews indicated lack of assistance to elderly persons as the most pressing concern. Low protection response capacity Most of the districts currently affected have a low protection capacity. Specialized assistance, such as mobility and assistive equipments for children, women, elderly persons and persons with disabilities, is lacking generally. Furthermore, systematic monitoring, reporting, response and referral mechanisms are non existent in the affected districts making it difficult for those affected to access any assistance and services. 5 Recommendations In order to respond to the above protection concerns it is recommended that the Protection Cluster including sub-clusters on child protection and gender-based violence be activated to ensure provision of the main life- saving interventions, in order to: • Advocate to Food Security, WASH, Health and Emergency Shelter Clusters to make special efforts to ensure that vulnerable women and children, people with disabilities, elderly persons and ethnic minorities have equal access to assistance without discrimination and in accordance with humanitarian principles. • Establish protection monitoring and reporting mechanisms to identify the protection concerns affecting vulnerable groups including children, women, elderly and disabled, based on the finding of the RPA. • Ensure that affected persons are referred to existing services. • Establish and support a mechanism immediately to prevent and respond to violence, exploitation and abuse of children and women, including gender-based violence. • If need be, ensure usage of Standard Registration Form(SRF) and tracing forms for separated and unaccompanied children and establish mechanism immediately to identify, register, verify, reunify and follow-up on separated and unaccompanied children. • To establish coordination mechanism at the district levels to reach the affected population. • Build the protection capacity of government departments and NGOs working