Superior National Forest - Heritage Centennial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Superior National Forest - Heritage Centennial Superior National Forest - Heritage Centennial Heritage Edition Did you know…? DO NOT DISTURB! Tofte Ranger District contains the most national forest land adjacent to Lake Archaeological and SUPERIOR NATIONAL FOREST HEADQUARTERS DULUTH , MN Superior for which the Forest was named. The word, Tofte is of Norwegian historic sites hold origin. The local community shares this name with a town in Norway. clues to Americas past. If disturbed, part History of the Land and the People... Laurentian Ranger District, based in Aurora, is named for an ancient range of of our heritage may be lost mountains that divided the continent millions of years ago. Although much forever. Sites and artifacts on reduced in height, the Laurentian Divide exists as a long ridge that cuts across There are many stories to tell about this boreal landscape and the people living here. Take time during public lands are protected by the Forest generally in an east-west direction. your travels to explore the rich and unique heritage of the Superior National Forest. To get you started, National Historic Preservation this guide provides an overview of Forest history and points out a few of the interesting sites you can In native Ojibwe, the word “ kawishiwi ” means “river full of many beaver or Act and Archaeological muskrat houses”. The bounty of fur-bearing animals in the area that is now the Resource Protection Act. If visit. Stop in at or contact one of our Forest offices listed on the back for more information. Kawishiwi Ranger District made it very popular with fur traders. you find such remains, please leave them undisturbed. The French word “ la croix ” translates loosely as “of or by the cross”. It is a Report your discoveries to frequent French-Canadian surname and also the name of the large lake which Forest Service personnel. lies partly on the LaCroix Ranger District and partly within Ontario, Canada. The Gunflint Trail on the Gunflint Ranger District was originally no more than a rough and rocky route from Grand Marais to Gunflint Lake where gunflints Get involved through Passport were quarried. Today, it is a federally-recognized scenic byway and historic in Time (PIT)! PIT is a Big Rice Lake Archeological Site: This site on the Laurentian Ranger route. Chik Wauk historic stone lodge, at the end of the trail ,has been District has been a particularly significant ricing location beyond restored to serve as an historic interpretive center. volunteer archaeology and memory. Thousands of pottery fragments along with pieces of stone historic preservation program and copper tools tell the story of a site used by native people for 2,000 of the USDA Forest Service years. An interpretive sign at the site provides more detail. where volunteers work on a To address new issues, Forest Service programs have ex- range of projects at locations panded to include new skills throughout the U.S. and new technologies such as For more information see: air quality monitoring.. www.passportintime.com Planning & Imagining & Responding Challenging 1999-Today 2009 The Future Computerized mapping, infrared aerial From global warming to recreation to photos, GPS -based wildlife telemetry and Superior housing to conservation, managers on the other modern technology allows employees to Superior National Forest remain committed to understand forest resources to an extent National the mission embarked upon 100 years ago. We never before possible. When called to respond continue striving to balance all the uses of the to natural disasters and other challenges, the Forest land in a way that will enable people to continue First Peoples Trading & Trapping Forest Service is able to create solutions that to use and enjoy the Forest through the next would have been impossible before. Turns 100! 100 years and beyond. Before recorded history 1600 - 1800 From the mid-1600’s to the early For more information, go to www.fs.fed.us/r9/superior on the web or contact: The origins of the land we now know as Native Americans were the first the Superior National Forest lie in people to live on what would 1800’s, Voyageurs canoed trading Superior National Forest Gunflint Tofte Kawishiwi LaCroix Laurentian geologic events that took place 1.1 become the Superior National routes, visited native settlements, and Headquarters Ranger District Ranger District Ranger District Ranger District Ranger Distric t billion years ago. Volcanoes created Forest. There are signs which exchanged trade goods for beaver pelts. 2020 W. Hwy 61 North Hwy 61 1393 Hwy. 169 320 Hwy 53 North 318 Forestry Road mountains that were carved by suggest that people lived here as Throughout the 1700’s, Hudson’s Bay 8901 Grand Avenue Place Grand Marais, MN P.O. Box 2159 Ely, MN 55731 Cook, MN 55723 Aurora, MN 55705 glaciers. As the glaciers retreated, melt long as 10,000 years ago. While Co. and the Northwest Co. maintained Duluth, MN 55808 55604 Tofte, MN 55615 (218) 365-7600 (218) 666-0020 (218) 229-8800 waters filled new lake beds, soils local tribes may have changed, the competing fur trade empires. Except for (218) 626-4300 (218) 387-1750 (218) 663-8060 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] trading posts, the voyageurs had little formed, trees and other vegetation took forest continues to be an important [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] impact on the land, traveling over it root and animals moved in. part of tribal traditions. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer without settling onto it. 12/21/2009 KAR 12/21/2009 KAR Superior National Forest - Heritage Centennial Edition Throughout time, people living here have been tied to the unique natural resources that set this Industrial jobs brought more people into the area, this time to settle on the land. Land passed from place apart. Thousands of years before the arrival of Europeans, native Americans traveled the the Ojibwe to the government to private hands. No longer valued as trading partners, native watery maze of lakes and streams to follow seasonal changes and foods to supplement the Americans saw their land dwindle to a few reservations. plentiful fish and game. Spring was spent at maple stands for sugar and syrup, summer at blueberry patches, and fall at wild rice beds. By the time the Superior National Forest was established most commercial timber was gone and mostly brush was left behind. The first 50 years of management on the Forest emphasized inventory, Europeans recognized different resource values in the area beginning with beaver pelts which were planting, restoring productivity, and protection. Some of the first harvests of the “new” forests was shipped back to Europe for manufacture into felt hats that were in high demand. Eventually, the by the Civilian Conservation Corps for building projects. During the last half of the century the fashion for beaver felted hats passed. Two new resources, iron ore and timber, became important tourism/outdoor recreation industry became more important. Multiple uses on the Forest brought in northern Minnesota and continue to be a major social-economic influence. The lakes and controversy between different interests, often with a focus on the Boundary Waters Canoe Area streams became corridors for transporting logs, powering mills, and providing water to the mining Wilderness (BWCAW). A growing national environmental conscience lead to a multitude of new industry. As technology improved, railroads reached into the forest to bring out ore and timber. federal regulations with direct implications for forest managers. Camp #8 of the Paulson Mine: FIRE LOOKOUT TOW- THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS St. Croix Logging With hopes of ERS were constructed ap- (CCC) put men to work on public lands at a time of Company— discovering a proximately six miles apart on 70% unemployment in Minnesota and 25% in the Interpretive way- lucrative iron the highest points across the U.S. ( crew pictured left) You will find many out- Forest. From the top, Forest side: This site at the ore source, min- standing examples of CCC contributions across the junction of Hwy 1 Rangers used an Osborne Fire ers dug several Forest, including: South Kawishiwi River Pavilion: and Hwy 2 on the Finder to pinpoint the location Kawishiwi Ranger test pits in this of a fire ( pictured below). This beautiful historic log structure (pictured below) District was used in area on the Communications from one is located at the South Kawishiwi Campground, 10.3 1906 as a winter Gunflint Ranger tower to the next was accom- miles south of Ely via State Highway 1. It continues logging camp and District between plished by ground telephone to serve its original purpose as a community building also for several sea- 1888 and 1893. lines in the early years, radios and is available for rent through the Kawishiwi sons as a spring Only one railroad car load of ore was ever actu- later. By the mid 1970’s, all of the federal fire tow- Ranger District Office. Jeannette Lake CCC Camp, camp for log drivers. ally produced. Six test pits associated with the ers in Minnesota had been removed while aircraft located on the LaCroix Ranger District along Echo took on fire detection. Between 1938 and 1958, a Paulson operation may be viewed from the Cen- Trail, 32 miles northeast of Orr, today is one of the most popular campgrounds on the Forest. Elephant Lake Trestle: (pictured at steel tower similar to the photo above stood at the tennial Trail which follows a section of the Sawbill CCC Camp Complex on Tofte Ranger District left) At the time the Superior Na- Skibo Fire Lookout Site, 8 miles south of Hoyt tional Forest was designated, rail- Kekekabic Hiking Lake, on the was constructed and then occupied by members of CCC roads criss-crossed the Forest con- Trail before switch- Laurentian Camp F-10 at the end of the historic Sawbill Trail.
Recommended publications
  • Pleistocene Geology of the Embarrass Area, St. Louis County
    UNNERSITY OF MINNESOTA This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a master's thesis by James Davis Lehr and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Charles L. Matsch Name of Faculty Advisor Signature of Faculty Advisor May 12, 2000 Date GRADUATE SCHOOL PLEISTOCENE GEOLOGY OF THE EMBARRASS ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FA CUL TY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY JAMES DA VIS LEHR IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE May,2000 © James Davis Lehr 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .................................................................. ........................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREALOCATION ................................................................................... l STUDY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................ 3 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION ........................................................................ 3 FIELD METHODS .................................... .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Glacier's Triple Divide Peak
    ISSUE NINE : WINTER 2018 The cover image is of tending water and listening at Water Bar in Greensboro, North Carolina, courte- sy Shanai Matteson, Works Progress, and Water Bar & Public Studio. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom- mercial 4.0 International License. This means each author holds the copyright to her or his work, and grants all users the rights to: share (copy and/or redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and/or build upon the material) the article, as long as the original author and source is cited, and the use is for noncommercial purposes. Open Rivers: Rethinking Water, Place & Community is produced by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing and the University of Minnesota Institute for Advanced Study. Editors Editorial Board Editor: Jay Bell, Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Patrick Nunnally, Institute for Advanced Study, Minnesota University of Minnesota Tom Fisher, Metropolitan Design Center, Administrative Editor: University of Minnesota Phyllis Mauch Messenger, Institute for Advanced Study, University of Minnesota Lewis E. Gilbert, Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota Assistant Editor: Laurie Moberg, Doctoral Candidate, Mark Gorman, Policy Analyst, Washington, D.C. Anthropology, University of Minnesota Jennifer Gunn, History of Medicine, University of Media and Production Manager: Minnesota Joanne Richardson, Institute for Advanced Study, University of Minnesota Katherine Hayes, Anthropology,
    [Show full text]
  • Border Ecologies in Boundary Waters
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2016-11 Border Flows: A Century of the Canadian-American Water Relationship Heasley, Lynne; Macfarlane, Daniel University of Calgary Press http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51751 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca BORDER FLOWS: A Century of the Canadian- American Water Relationship Edited by Lynne Heasley and Daniel Macfarlane ISBN 978-1-55238-896-9 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Minnesota to Eanh Science Teachers and Others Who Have Some Background in Geology
    • I ,\ L... L....L..L L.. L...L.... A uide for Teachers G.B.l\lore,· Henk Dahlber; Uni~'ersit" or Minnesota, Minnesota Department or Minnesota Natural Resources. Geological Sun'(') Di"ision or Minerals St. Paul. Minnesota Hibbing, Minnesota Table of Contents Preface ] Introduction. ...••••............•........... 11 The Big Picture of Minnesota Landforms I Basic Geology; Processes, Rocks, and Geologic Time 3 ABrief Geologic History 10 Mineral Industry of Minnesota 27 Glossary 29 Acknowledgments , inside back cover Preface HIS BOOK WAS WRllTEN TO provide an up-to-date under­ Tstanding of the geology of Minnesota to Eanh Science teachers and others who have some background in geology. It is not intended to stand alone, for there are already in print many good books about rocks and other geologic phenomena in the state. These include Minnesota's Rocks and Waters by George M. Schwartz and George A. Thiel, first published by the University of Minnesota Press in 1954 as well as Minnesota's Geology by Richard W. Ojakangas and Charles L. Matsch also published by the University of Minnesota Press in 1982. A third excellent discussion is Minnesota Undelfoot by Constance J. Sansome published by Voyager Press in 1983. Even though they are all more than 20 years old, these books, and especially the latter, remain the best guides to many of the state's outstanding geologic features. These volumes remain useful today because the rocks at the localities described in them remain unchanged. However, research over the past decade has considerably changed our understanding of the geologic processes responsible for those geologic phenom­ ena and their place in geologic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunflint Trail National Scenic Byway
    GUNFLINT TRAIL NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY Corridor Management Plan November 2014 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 VISION STATEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 3 TRAIL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................ 5 DRIVING THE GUNFLINT TRAIL .................................................................................................... 5 GUNFLINT TRAIL SCENIC BYWAY MAP ......................................................................................... 6 COMMITMENT TO THE GUNFLINT TRAIL NATINOAL SCENIC BYWAY .............................. 7 COMMITTEE ......................................................................................................................................... 7 PUBLIC PROCESS ................................................................................................................................ 7 COMMUNITY ........................................................................................................................................ 7 AGENCIES & ORGANIZATIONS .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mesabi Project EA
    Environmental United States Department of Agriculture Assessment Forest Service October Mesabi Project 2016 Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest St. Louis County, Minnesota Townships 59-61 North, Ranges 16-21 West In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Minnesota's Crossover Connections
    23 American Currents Vol. 41, No. 4 IN SEARCH OF MINNESOTA’S CROSSOVER CONNECTIONS Konrad Schmidt Saint Paul, MN I have always been fascinated with fish distribution. Shortnose Gar Lepisosteus platostomus, Bullhead Minnow How did they get to where they are today? Of course Pimephales vigilax, Pugnose Minnow Opsopoeodus emili- since humans have arrived on the scene, we have played ae, Blackstripe Topminnow Fundulus notatus, Warmouth a major role in spreading species around both intention- Lepomis gulosus, Western Sand Darter Ammocrypta clara, ally through stocking or accidentlly via navigation and and River Darter Percina shumardi) in the Lake Michi- drainage projects. However, a pet peeve of mine is the gan basin. John Lyons (Wisconsin Department of Natural rush to judgment of so many biologists to conveniently Resources and NANFA member) believes at least 15 addi- dismiss new occurrences in drainages or disjunct locali- tional species have crossed this natural flood connection ties as bait-bucket releases. One case in point was the over the last several thousand years rather than just the 1974 discovery of Northern Sunfish (Lepomis peltastes) period following the construction of the navigation canal. in Minnesota from a very isolated lake miles inside the He noted early historical accounts report spring flooding Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Access to the of the Wisconsin River flowing down the Fox River for lake is restricted to non-motorized watercraft requiring several days at a time. several long and rugged portages. The initial assumption Crisscrossing Minnesota doing fish surveys for more regarding the origin of this population was an illegal in- than 40 years I have become more and more intrigued troduction; however, the possibility of being a natural with road signs marking continental and drainage divides.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Community That Supports the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail President’S Letter
    The Continental Divide Trail Coalition Magazine Volume 11, December 2017 Connecting the community that supports the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail President’s Letter As the Continental As friends of the CDT and public lands, we can help to Divide Trail Coalition educate these new arrivals (as well as long-term residents!) planned trail building and create more passionate trail users who understand projects, organized that we can’t take these things for granted. Threats to sell volunteers and then off public lands, to reduce the size of national monuments implemented our trail and to undermine the strength of the Forest Service and work this summer, I other agencies are very real, and we will be lucky just to was reminded again hold the line over the next few years. Our mission to create of the importance of a community committed to constructing, promoting and volunteerism and of protecting the CDT is more important than ever. nonprofit partners You are our best advocates. Take someone new out for a working with our day hike, trail ride or backpacking trip on our public lands. federal land managers Tell your friends, neighbors and coworkers about your love to steward and maintain for public lands in general, and the CDT in particular, and our public lands. encourage them to give back. With continued uncertainty in the federal budgeting For some people, time to actually get out and volunteer process, our land managers face increasing maintenance may be rare, but a small donation to CDTC goes a backlogs, meaning many campgrounds, roads and trails will long way.
    [Show full text]
  • David Dill Arrowhead State Trail Master Plan Public Review Draft
    David Dill/Arrowhead State Trail Master Plan PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT-June 15, 2021 Parks and Trails Division David Dill/Arrowhead State Trail Master Plan-PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT-06/15/2021 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... v Ownership and Management Considerations .......................................................................................... v Recommended Uses ................................................................................................................................. v Use considerations and management ...................................................................................................... v Background and Planning History ................................................................................................................. 1 Planning history .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment Grand Portage National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Grand Portage National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/GRPO/NRR—2014/783 Month 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior NationalON THE COVERPark Service The Great Hall on the shore of Grand Portage Bay, Grand Portage National Monument NaturalPhotograph Resource by Dave Mechenich Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado Natural Resource Condition Assessment Grand Portage National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/GRPO/NRR—2014/783 George J. Kraft David J. Mechenich Christine Mechenich Matthew D. Waterhouse Jen McNelly Center66T for Watershed Science and Education College66T of Natural Resources University66T of Wisconsin – Stevens Point Stevens66T Point, Wisconsin 54481 Jeffrey66T Dimick Aquatic66T Biomonitoring Laboratory College66T of Natural Resources University66T of Wisconsin – Stevens Point Stevens66T Point, Wisconsin 54481 James E. Cook College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 This report was prepared with funding from the National Park Service under Task Agreement P11AC60779 of the Great Lakes Northern Forest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit under Cooperative Agreement CA H6000082000 between the National Park Service and the University of Minnesota. March 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Historic Resource Assessments at Forteau, Labrador
    DRAFT Goodwood-Timmins Haul Road and Howse Property Historic Resources Impact Assessment, near Schefferville, QC Archaeological Investigation permits #14.42 Irony Mountain, viewed from northwest end of Howse Property Project Area. Submitted to Provincial Archaeology Office Department of Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development Confederation Building St. John’s, NL A1B 4J6 & Loic Didillon Tata Steel Minerals Canada, 1000, rue Sherbrooke, Bereau 1120, Montreal, QC, H3A 3G4 Submitted by Gerald Penney Associates Limited 104-40 Quidi Vidi Road St. John’s, NL A1A 1C1 31 October 2014 Goodwood-Timmins/Howse Property HRIA 2014 Gerald Penney Associates Limited CONTENTS Letter of transmittal .................................................................................................. 2 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 3 Participants ............................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Study area/Natural features ...................................................................................... 5 Previous Archaeology .............................................................................................. 8 Historic Background .............................................................................................. 10 Field Results ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report Is Explicitly About Reparations and Not About Adjustments to the Status Quo
    Cash Back A Yellowhead Institute Red Paper MAY 2021 A Yellowhead Institute Red Paper 1 “…the more we live as Indigenous People, the more that we have, the more freedom that we have, the more we can envision the hope and the realization of our liberation as Indigenous People. And that is what is such a threat to the state, that is what is such a threat to the economy.” MOLLY WICKHAM (SLEYDO’): CAS-YIKH (GRIZZLY) HOUSE GIDIMT’EN CLAN OF THE WET’SUWET’EN NATION RANSOM ECONOMY WEBINAR 2 Cash Back Table of Contents 5 Introduction 12 Executive Summary 16 PART ONE How Canada Got Its Economy: A History of Economic Dispossession 32 PART TWO Colonialism as Fiscal Policy: Following the Money 48 PART THREE How to Get That Cash Back: Redress, Compensation, and Restitution 67 Conclusion 69 Endnotes 73 Credits A Yellowhead Institute Red Paper 3 Cash Back is about restitution from the perspective of stolen wealth. 4 Cash Back An Indigenous economy would be built upon the jurisdiction of Indigenous nations over our territories, not the 0.2 percent economies of reserves and the federal transfer system.1 Therefore, this report is explicitly about reparations and not about adjustments to the status quo. Cash Back is not a charity project; it is part of a decolonization process. Colonization is an economic project based on land theft. It requires a political system that operates through domination and violence to maintain this theft. Therefore, that which enriches the settler state necessarily impoverishes and criminalizes the colonized.2 But wealth is not exclusive to this economic system — a form of accumulation based in hoarding and exploitation.
    [Show full text]