DOCSLIB.ORG

Gunflint Trail National Scenic Byway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gunflint Trail National Scenic Byway GUNFLINT TRAIL NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY Corridor Management Plan November 2014 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 VISION STATEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 3 TRAIL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................ 5 DRIVING THE GUNFLINT TRAIL .................................................................................................... 5 GUNFLINT TRAIL SCENIC BYWAY MAP ......................................................................................... 6 COMMITMENT TO THE GUNFLINT TRAIL NATINOAL SCENIC BYWAY .............................. 7 COMMITTEE ......................................................................................................................................... 7 PUBLIC PROCESS ................................................................................................................................ 7 COMMUNITY ........................................................................................................................................ 7 AGENCIES & ORGANIZATIONS ...................................................................................................... 8 INTRINSIC QUALITIES .......................................................................................................................... 9 NATURAL INTRINSIC QUALITIES .................................................................................................. 9 HISTORICAL INTRINSIC QUALITIES ............................................................................................ 9 INVENTORY OF INTRINSIC QUALITIES AND POINTS OF INTEREST ............................... 11 STRATEGIES TO MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE INTRINSIC QUALITIES .............................. 15 THE TRAVELER EXPERIENCE .......................................................................................................... 16 VISITOR PROFILE ............................................................................................................................. 16 SCENIC BYWAY SURVEY ................................................................................................................ 16 COMMITMENT TO THE TRAVELER EXPERIENCE: BUSINESSES ...................................... 16 COMMITMENT TO THE TRAVELER EXPERIENCE: COMMUNITY .................................... 17 STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE AND MAINTAIN THE TRAVELER EXPERIENCE ................ 17 SIGNAGE .................................................................................................................................................. 18 OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CONTROLS ....................................................................................... 18 SIGNAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 18 LOGO .................................................................................................................................................... 19 GATEWAY SIGNS .............................................................................................................................. 19 INTERPRETIVE SIGNS ..................................................................................................................... 19 COMMERCE & DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................... 20 EXISTING DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES .................................................................................. 20 LAND MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................... 20 ZONING ................................................................................................................................................ 20 BUILDING CODES .............................................................................................................................. 20 ROAD/HIGHWAY ............................................................................................................................... 20 ROADSIDE ........................................................................................................................................... 20 TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................................... 22 SAFETY ON THE ROAD .................................................................................................................... 22 ACCOMMODATING COMMERCE ................................................................................................. 22 PULL-OUTS AND INTERPRETATIVE AREAS ............................................................................. 23 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................... 24 DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO ROAD ......................................................................................... 24 COOK COUNTY HIGHWAY PLANS .............................................................................................. 24 FUTURE PLANS .................................................................................................................................. 24 IMAPCT ON THE BYWAY ................................................................................................................ 24 DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO BYWAY ...................................................................................... 24 MARKETING POSITIONING NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY ........................................................ 25 KEY MARKETING MESSAGES ....................................................................................................... 25 TARGET AUDIENCE ......................................................................................................................... 25 GOALS .................................................................................................................................................. 25 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 26 STRATEGIES ....................................................................................................................................... 26 INTERPRETING OUR SCENIC BYWAY ........................................................................................... 27 COMMITMENT TO INTERPRETATION ....................................................................................... 27 STRATEGIES FOR INTERPRETATION ........................................................................................ 27 RECOMMENDED ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................................................ 28 STRATEGY TO PRESERVE/ENHANCE IQ ....................................................................................... 29 COMMITMENT TO PRESERVATION & ENHANCEMENT ...................................................... 29 MONITORING AND REGULATING PRESERVATION .............................................................. 29 STRATEGIC PLANS & PARTNERSHIPS ........................................................................................... 30 GOALS ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Communication ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Interpretive Plans — Natural .............................................................................................................. 32 Interpretive Plans — Historic .............................................................................................................. 32 Vegetation Management Plan .............................................................................................................. 33 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................... 34 Official Designation as Scenic Byway ................................................................................................... 34 APPENDIX A: SCENIC BYWAY COMMITTEE ................................................................................ 35 APPENDIX B: VISIONING PROCESS ................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX C: DEMOGRAPHICS ........................................................................................................ 38 APPENDIX D: VISITOR PROFILE ...................................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX E: SCENIC BYWAY SURVEY ......................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX F: MORE INFORMATION ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness T R I P P L a N N I N G G U I D E
    BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA WILDERNESS T RIP P LANNING G UIDE Your BWCAW Adventure Starts Here… Share the Experience, Peter Nelson GREAT GLACIERS carved the physical Provincial Parks and is bordered on the What’s Inside… features of what is today known as west by Voyageurs National Park. The Page 2 . Planning your BWCAW Trip the Boundary Waters Canoe Area BWCAW contains over 1200 miles of Page 2 . Superior National Forest Wilderness (BWCAW) by scraping and canoe routes, 12 hiking trails and over Recreation Alternatives gouging rock. The glaciers left behind 2000 designated campsites. This area was Page 3 . Reservation & Permit Basics Page 4 . Leave No Trace rugged cliffs and crags, canyons, gentle set aside in 1926 to preserve its primitive Page 5 . BWCAW Rules and Regulations hills, towering rock formations, rocky character and made a part of the Page 6 – 7 . Smart and Safe Wilderness shores, sandy beaches and thousands National Wilderness Preservation System Travel Page 8-9 ����������� BWCAW Entry Points of lakes and streams, interspersed with in 1964 with subsequent legislation in Page 10 . The BWCAW Past and Present islands and surrounded by forest. 1978. Page 10 . The BWCAW Act The BWCAW is a unique area Wilderness offers freedom to those Page 11 . Fire in the Wilderness located in the northern third of the who wish to pursue an experience Page 12 – 13 . Protecting Your Natural Resources Superior National Forest in northeastern of expansive solitude, challenge and Page 14 . Special Uses Minnesota. Over 1 million acres in personal connection with nature. The Page 15 . Youth Activity Page size, it extends nearly 150 miles along BWCAW allows visitors to canoe, Page 16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Lake of the Woods Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    Lake of the Woods Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report March 2016 Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs MPCA Lake of the Woods Watershed Report by using the Internet to distribute reports and Team: information to wider audience. Visit our April Andrews, Benjamin Lundeen, Nathan website for more information. Sather, Jesse Anderson, Bruce Monson, Cary MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- Hernandez, Sophia Vaughan, Jane de Lambert, consumer recycled content paper David Duffey, Shawn Nelson, Andrew Streitz, manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Stacia Grayson derivatives. Contributors / acknowledgements Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Lake of the Woods county Soil and Water Conservation Districts Roseau county Soil and Water Conservation Districts The Red Lake Nation Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | [email protected] This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: wq-ws3-09030009 Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Picture Rock of Crooked Lake
    The Picture Rock of Crooked Lake Grace Lee Nute WHAT THE HIEROGLYPHS on ancient Pharaohs' tombs are to Egyp­ tians, what the carvings and symbols on Maya and Aztec temples are to Mexicans, the Indian picture rocks on border waters are to Minnesotans. They are bold, sheer cliffs on which aborigines have painted or carved, high above water usually, the figures of animals, birds, and men, as well as other representations. There is a picture rock on Lac la Croix, famous for its bright colors and accessibUity; another on Hegman Lake in Superior National Forest; and one on Darkey Lake in Quetico Provincial Park. Several others could be mentioned. The most famous of these cliffs is the Picture Rock of Crooked Lake, a narrow, tortuous body of water between Basswood Lake and Lac la Croix. Its renown is due not only to its painted hiero­ glyphics, but, more especially, to its history. The first explorer to report this rock was also one of the most explicit in his account of it. This was Sir Alexander Mackenzie, whose trip to the Arctic Ocean in 1789 resulted in the naming after him of one of North America's greatest rivers. In 1801, after a sec­ ond trip, this time across the' continent to the Pacific, he published an account of his two expeditions. It is in this book that one reads a description of the Picture Rock of Crooked Lake: "Then succeeds the portage of La Croche. Within three miles of the last Port­ age is a remarkable rock, with a smooth face, but split and cracked in different parts, which hang over the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Licenses
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NEW Regulations for 2006 n....................................................................5ew Fishing Licenses .......................................................................................7 General Regulations................................................................................10 Angling Methods................................................................................10 Possessing Fish ..................................................................................10 Transporting Fish ...............................................................................11 Other...................................................................................................13 Seasons and Limits ............................................................................15 Inland Waters......................................................................................15 Stream Trout.......................................................................................18 Lake Superior and Tributaries ................................................................20 Special Regulations............................................................................24 Intensive Management Lakes.............................................................24 Individual Waters ...............................................................................25 – Lakes.............................................................................................25 – Streams and Rivers .......................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • A Resource Assessment of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, 1999 - 2003
    United States Department of AFTER THE BLOWDOWN: Agriculture Forest A RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Service Northern OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS Research Station General Technical CANOE AREA WILDERNESS, Report NRS-7 1999 - 2003 W. Keith Moser, Mark H. Hansen, Mark D. Nelson, Susan J. Crocker, Charles H. Perry, Bethany Schulz, Christopher W. Woodall, Linda M. Nagel, Manfred E. Mielke Abstract The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) is an ecological and recreational treasure situated within the Superior National Forest in northern Minnesota, USA. It contains some of the last unspoiled remnants of the great North Woods of the Lake Superior region. A major storm hit the BWCAW on July 4, 1999. Known as the “Boundary Waters- Canadian Derecho,” this rare type of storm lasted for more than 22 hours, traveled more than 1,300 miles, and produced wind speeds averaging almost 60 mph. Following the devastation of the windstorm, the Forest Inventory and Analysis unit of the Northern Research Station collaborated with the Eastern Region of the USDA Forest Service and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to sample this landscape and assess the effects of this catastrophic event. Live-tree volume per acre estimates in the BWCAW were 29 percent lower for plots damaged by wind (796 cubic feet/acre) than for plots with no disturbance (1,128 cubic feet/acre). For the aspen/birch forest-type group and the hardwoods supergroup, volume per acre was signifi cantly lower in blowdown conditions than in conditions of no disturbance. Mean fuel loadings estimates indicate that blowdown areas had nearly twice the 100- and 1,000-hr+ fuels as the non-blowdown areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6232 Department of Natural Resources Big G a M E
    MINNESOTA RULES 2008 4 6 4 CHAPTER 6232 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BIG G A M E 6 2 3 2 0 4 0 0 REGISTRATION OF DEER 6232 3800 APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR A MOOSE 6 2 3 2 0 6 0 0 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY LICENSE ARCHERY 6232 4100 MOOSE ZONES 6232 1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS 6 2 3 2 4 4 0 0 GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR TAKING ELK 6232 1500 ARMS USE AREAS AND RESTRICTIONS 6232 4500 ELK LICENSE APPLICATION PROCEDURE 6 2 3 2 1980 TAKING DEER BY ANY WEAPON USING 6232 4600 ELK ZONES DISEASE MANAGEMENT PERMITS 6232 4700 REGISTRATION BLOCKS 6232 2900 BEAR PERMIT PROCEDURES 6232.0400 REGISTRATION OF DEER. Subpart 1 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Subp 2 Registration requirements. Persons tagging a deer must present the deer for registration at a designated deer registration station or agent of the commissioner and obtam a big game possession tag [For text of items A and B, see MR.] [For text ofsubps 3 and 4, see M R ] Subp 5 Deer taken in the special bovine tuberculosis area. Deer taken in the spe­ cial bovine tuberculosis area (deer area 101) must be registered prior to transport outside the area. Statutory Authority: MS s 97A 535, 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.0600 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY ARCHERY. Subpart 1 Open dates. The open dates for taking deer by archery are from the Satur­ day nearest September 16 through December 31. Subp 2 [Repealed, 33 SR 215] Subp 3 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Statutory Authority: MS s 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fork River, Minnesota 1. the Area
    Little Fork River , Minnesota 1. The area surrounding the river: a. The Little Fork watershed is located in Itasca, St. Louis, and Koochichinz Counties, Minnesota. It rises in a rather flat region in St. Louis County and follows a meandering course to the northwest through Koochiching County to its junction with the Rainy River about 19 miles below Little Fork, Minnesota. The area is a hummocky rolling surface made up of morainic deposits and glacial drift laid over a bedrock composed largely of granitic, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks. The upper basin is covered with dense cedar forests with some trees up to three feet in diameter. Needles form a thick layer over the ground with ferns turning the forest floor into a green carpet. In the lower basin the forest changes to hardwoods with elm predominating. Dense brush covers the forest floor. Farming is the major land use other than timber production in the area of Minnesota, but terrain limits areas where farming is practical. Transportation routes in this area are good due to its proximity to International Falls, Minnesota, a major border crossing into Canada. U. S. 53 runs north-south to International Falls about 25 miles east of the basin. U. S. 71 runs northeast-southwest and crosses the river at. Little Fork, Minnesota, and follows the U. S. /Canadian border to International Falls. Minnesota Route 217 connects these two major north-south routes in an east-west direction from Little Fork, Minnesota. Minnesota Route 65 follows the river southward from Little Fork, Minnesota. b. Population within a 50-mile radius was estimated at 173, 000 in.
    [Show full text]
  • July 19, 2016 Hon. Tom Vilsack Hon. Sally
    July 19, 2016 Hon. Tom Vilsack Hon. Sally Jewell Secretary of Agriculture Secretary of the Interior U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of the Interior 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20250 Washington, DC 20240 Dear Secretary Vilsack, Secretary Jewell, and Director Goldfuss, The Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness is the most visited Wilderness area in the nation, drawing 250,000 visitors every year. At 1.1 million acres in size, it is the largest Wilderness area east of the Rockies and north of the Everglades. The Boundary Waters offers 1,200 miles of canoe and kayak routes and 2,000 designated campsites, and is home to some of the finest remote angling and hunting our country has to offer. Sportsmen and women venture into the Boundary Waters in pursuit of walleye, bass, pike, trout, bear, deer, grouse, and more. The Boundary Waters is now jeopardized by recent proposals to bring sulfide­ore copper mining – a risky type of mining that has never before been permitted in Minnesota – to places where pollution will drain into the Boundary Waters. Byproducts of sulfide­ore copper mining (acidic waters, heavy metal contaminants and sulfates) would damage rivers and lakes that flow into the heart of the Boundary Waters, as well as the interconnected waters of Voyageurs National Park, Quetico Provincial Park, and the greater Rainy River Drainage Basin. This could permanently ruin the productive fish & game habitats that make this internationally significant area unique. Pollution from these mines would flow into the Boundary Waters as well as impact Voyageurs National Park ­ which help drive the economy of Northeastern Minnesota, where tourism supports nearly 17,000 jobs and brings $850 million in sales annually to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfide-Ore Copper Mining And/Or a Sustainable Boundary Waters Economy: the Need to Consider Real Tradeoffs
    Sulfide-Ore Copper Mining and/or A Sustainable Boundary Waters Economy: The Need to Consider Real Tradeoffs Spencer Phillips, PhD Carolyn Alkire, PhD October 2017 Prepared for: Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness Research and strategy for the land community. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USDA Forest Service is considering how to analyze the environmental impacts of the proposed withdrawal, for up to 20 years, of 234,328 acres of federally-owned lands within the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) from the federal mining program (USDA Forest Service, 2017). Because environmental impacts include effects on the economy, the question of how many jobs might be created by new mining activity in the Arrowhead region (defined here as St. Louis, Lake, and Cook Counties, Minnesota) is important. Equally important, but something that has so far been lost in the debate, is how many jobs and how much income in other sectors, and how much economic value that may not show up in job and income statistics—what economists refer to as “non- market” value (Stout, Winthrop, & Moore, 2015)—could be destroyed by the introduction of novel mining activity. Proponents of sulfide-ore copper mining argue that the choice between this new type of mining and amenity-based development is a false choice for the Arrowhead region (Praxis Strategy Group, 2017). Those making this claim point to the continued existence of the taconite mining industry during the now decades-long expansion of amenity-based development in the region as proof that northeastern Minnesota can, in essence, “have it all.” According to this argument, the region can gain a relative handful of higher-paying jobs in mining; it can continue to have an abundance of high-quality recreational, scenic, and environmental amenities; and it can have jobs, income, and quality of life that exist in the region because of those amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of the Embarrass Area, St. Louis County
    UNNERSITY OF MINNESOTA This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a master's thesis by James Davis Lehr and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Charles L. Matsch Name of Faculty Advisor Signature of Faculty Advisor May 12, 2000 Date GRADUATE SCHOOL PLEISTOCENE GEOLOGY OF THE EMBARRASS ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FA CUL TY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY JAMES DA VIS LEHR IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE May,2000 © James Davis Lehr 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .................................................................. ........................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREALOCATION ................................................................................... l STUDY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................ 3 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION ........................................................................ 3 FIELD METHODS .................................... .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Minnesota Fishing Regulations Handbook
    2014 MINNESOTA FISHING REGULATIONS Effective March 1, 2014 through February 28, 2015 ©MN Fishing ©MN Fishing mndnr.gov (888) 646-6367 (651) 296-6157 24‑hour TIP hotline 1‑800‑652‑9093 (dial #TIP for AT&T, Midwest Wireless, Unicel and Verizon cell phone customers) nglers contribute to good fishing every time they purchaseA a rod, reel or most other manufactured fishing products. ot apparent at the checkout counter, Nthese purchases quietly raise revenue through a 10 percent federal excise tax paid by the manufacturers. ranting these dollars to Minnesota and other statesG is the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through its Wildlife and Sports Fish Restoration program. ast year, the Minnesota DNR received $13.6 Lmillion through this program. very one of these dollars is used to maintain and Eimprove fishing, boating and angling access, and help create the next generation of environmentally enlightened anglers. ead more about this important funding sourceR at http://wsfr75.com pread the word, too, so more people know how Smanufacturers, anglers and natural resource agencies work together. Photo courtesy of Take Me Fishing Angler Notes: DNR Information: (651) 296-6157 or 1-888-646-6367 (MINNDNR) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Trespass Law ..................................................................................................................... 2 Aquatic Invasive Species .................................................................................................... 3 Definitions ..........................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Glacier's Triple Divide Peak
    ISSUE NINE : WINTER 2018 The cover image is of tending water and listening at Water Bar in Greensboro, North Carolina, courte- sy Shanai Matteson, Works Progress, and Water Bar & Public Studio. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCom- mercial 4.0 International License. This means each author holds the copyright to her or his work, and grants all users the rights to: share (copy and/or redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and/or build upon the material) the article, as long as the original author and source is cited, and the use is for noncommercial purposes. Open Rivers: Rethinking Water, Place & Community is produced by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing and the University of Minnesota Institute for Advanced Study. Editors Editorial Board Editor: Jay Bell, Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Patrick Nunnally, Institute for Advanced Study, Minnesota University of Minnesota Tom Fisher, Metropolitan Design Center, Administrative Editor: University of Minnesota Phyllis Mauch Messenger, Institute for Advanced Study, University of Minnesota Lewis E. Gilbert, Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota Assistant Editor: Laurie Moberg, Doctoral Candidate, Mark Gorman, Policy Analyst, Washington, D.C. Anthropology, University of Minnesota Jennifer Gunn, History of Medicine, University of Media and Production Manager: Minnesota Joanne Richardson, Institute for Advanced Study, University of Minnesota Katherine Hayes, Anthropology,
    [Show full text]