DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report Survey and analyzes of international experience and good practices concerning realization of public- private partnerships into protected areas. TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared by: Federico Brunelli and Giacomo Benelli Date: Novembre 2 nd 2009 Federico BRUNELLI Via Saraceno, 92 – 44121 Ferrara (ITALY) Ul. Okulickiego, 17/29 – 42-200 Czestochowa (Poland) [email protected] Giacomo BENELLI Via delle Mimose, 88 - 48100 Marina Romea, Ravenna (ITALY) [email protected] Index 1. Background and aims of this study........................................................................................................... 5 2. Collection of PPP’s best practices among Europe ................................................................................... 6 2.1. Eco-tourism ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Birdwatching Fair, Po Delta Park Emilia-Romagna, Italy ........................................................ 9 2.1.2 Boat trip in the Lagoon of Comacchio, Po Delta Park Emilia-Romagna, Italy ...................... 18 2.1.3 Sustainable Mobility in the Adamello-Brenta National Park, Italy ......................................... 21 2.1.4 Permanent Forum of the European Charter for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas, Ebro Delta Natural Park, Spain............................................................................................................... 29 2.1.5 Operating Heritage Centre Ukko, Koli National Park, Finland .............................................. 35 2.1.6 Eco-tourism’s SWOT ............................................................................................................. 40 2.2 Food products ................................................................................................................................ 41 2.2.1 Manifattura dei Marinati, Po Delta Park Emilia-Romagna, Italy ............................................ 42 2.2.2 Saltpans of Cervia, Po Delta Park Emilia-Romagna, Italy .................................................... 45 2.2.3 Saltpans of Se čovlje, Se čovlje Salina Nature Park, Slovenia ............................................... 48 2.2.4 Food Products of the Park, Cinque Terre National Park, Italy .............................................. 57 2.2.5 Food products’ SWOT ........................................................................................................... 62 2.3 Certification .................................................................................................................................... 63 2.3.1 Emblema of the quality’s products, Po Delta Park Emilia-Romagna, Italy............................ 64 2.3.2 Quality brand of the Park, Cinque Terre National Park, Italy ................................................ 66 2.3.3 Quality brand of French Parks, Verdon Regional Nature Park, France ................................ 68 2.3.4 Certification’s SWOT ............................................................................................................. 74 2.4 Environmental conservation and service ....................................................................................... 75 2.4.1 Emergence enterprises incubator, Verdon Regional Nature Park, France........................... 76 2.4.2 To Promote Landscape Stewardship, Babia Gora National Park, Poland............................ 78 2.4.3 Environmental conservation and service’s SWOT ................................................................ 84 3. Introduction to Bulgarian Nature Parks............................................................................................... 85 3.1 Bulgarka Nature Park ..................................................................................................................... 88 3.2 Vitosha Nature Park ....................................................................................................................... 88 3.3 Vrachanski Balkan Nature Park ..................................................................................................... 89 3.4 Zlatni Piasatsi Nature Park............................................................................................................. 89 3.5 Persina Nature Park ....................................................................................................................... 89 3.6 Rilski Manastir Nature Park............................................................................................................ 90 3.7 Russenski Lom Nature Park .......................................................................................................... 90 3.8 Sinite Kamani Nature Park............................................................................................................. 90 3.9 Strandzha Nature Park................................................................................................................... 91 3.10 Shumensko Plateau Nature Park................................................................................................... 91 3.11 Belassitza Nature Park................................................................................................................... 91 3.12 Visitor’s attitudes towards nature parks of Bulgaria and the PPPs in NPs................................ 92 4. GuideLine for PPP in Bulgaria............................................................................................................ 95 4.1 PPP scheme– study case “Agreement” ........................................................................................ 97 4.2 PPP scheme– study case “Contract” ........................................................................................... 100 5. Proposed study tours........................................................................................................................ 102 5.1 Adamello-Brenta National Park, Italy ........................................................................................... 103 5.2 Babia-Gora National Park, Poland ............................................................................................... 105 5.3 Verdon National Park, France...................................................................................................... 107 5.4 Route of Salt................................................................................................................................. 109 5.5 Route of Quality Brand ................................................................................................................. 113 6. Annexes..................................................................................................................................................... 119 6.1 Annex 1: Schedule – Birdwatching fair ............................................................................................... 119 6.2 Annex 2: Schedule – Boat trip in the Lagoon of Comacchio............................................................... 122 6.3 Annex 3: Schedule – Sustainable Mobility in Adamello-Brenta National Park ................................... 124 6.4 Annex 4: Schedule – Permanent Forum of the European Charter for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas ......................................................................................................................................................... 126 6.5 Annex 5: Schedule – Operating Heritage Centre Ukko ...................................................................... 130 6.6 Annex 6: Schedule – Manifattura dei Marinati .................................................................................... 133 6.7 Annex 7: Schedule – Making salt in the Saltpans of Cervia ............................................................... 136 6.8 Annex 8: Schedule - Making salt in the Saltpans of Secovlje ............................................................. 138 6.9 Annex 9: Schedule – Food Products of the Cinque Terre National Park............................................ 140 6.10 Annex 10: Schedule – Emblem of the Po Delta Park ....................................................................... 142 3 6.11 Annex 11: Schedule – Quality Brand of Cinque Terre Park.............................................................. 144 6.12 Annex 12: Schedule – Quality Brand of French Park ....................................................................... 146 6.13 Annex 13: Schedule – Emergence enterprises incubator................................................................. 148 6.14 Annex 14: Schedule – To promote landscape Stewardship ............................................................. 150 7. Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 152 4 1. Background and aims of this study A Nature Park aims to support the fruition and to promote the natural heritage of protected area; that requires, nowadays, a significant commitment by local institutions and private sectors and the wider community to encourage cultural change which ensures a long-term balance between sustainable human activities and biodiversity conservation. At the Bulgarian national level viable actions require a range of management strategies that may include the establishment of Public-Private Partnerships; this type of collaboration may be between public organizations, private landowners, private companies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Company Profile
    www.ecobulpack.com COMPANY PROFILE KEEP BULGARIA CLEAN FOR THE CHILDREN! PHILIPPE ROMBAUT Chairman of the Board of Directors of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of AGROPOLYCHIM JSC-Devnia e, ECOBULPACK are dedicated to keeping clean the environment of the country we live Wand raise our children in. This is why we rely on good partnerships with the State and Municipal Authorities, as well as the responsible business managers who have supported our efforts from the very beginning of our activity. Because all together we believe in the cause: “Keep Bulgaria clean for the children!” VIDIO VIDEV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Executive Director of NIVA JSC-Kostinbrod,VIDONA JSC-Yambol t ECOBULPACK we guarantee the balance of interests between the companies releasing A packed goods on the market, on one hand, and the companies collecting and recycling waste, on the other. Thus we manage waste throughout its course - from generation to recycling. The funds ECOBULPACK accumulates are invested in the establishment of sustainable municipal separate waste collection systems following established European models with proven efficiency. DIMITAR ZOROV Executive Director of ECOBULPACK Owner of “PARSHEVITSA” Dairy Products ince the establishment of the company we have relied on the principles of democracy as Swell as on an open and fair strategy. We welcome new shareholders. We offer the business an alternative in fulfilling its obligations to utilize packaged waste, while meeting national legislative requirements. We achieve shared responsibilities and reduce companies’ product- packaging fees. MILEN DIMITROV Procurator of ECOBULPACK s a result of our joint efforts and the professionalism of our work, we managed to turn AECOBULPACK JSC into the largest organization utilizing packaging waste, which so far have gained the confidence of more than 3 500 companies operating in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park
    Draft Management Plan Persina Nature Park October 2006 Abbreviations AF Agricultural Fund BAS Bulgarian Academy of Science BD Basin Directorate BDA Biodiversity Act (Bulgaria) BGN Bulgarian Leva BSPB Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds CBD Convention on Conservation of Biological Diversity CC Consultative Council CHH Cultural Historical Heritage CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna CMS Conservation Management System CoM Council of Ministers dka Decares (1,000m2) EA Environmental assessment EAFA Executive Agency for Fishing and Aquaculture EEA Environmental Executive Agency EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMEPA Enterprise for management of environmental protection activities ESE Ecologically sustainable enterprise EU European Union EUNIS European Nature Information System FF Forestry Fund FMS Forest management section GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System ha Hectare IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources km Kilometre l Litre LAG Local Action Group m Metre m/s Metres per second m2 Square metre m3 Cubic metre MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MDC Main drainage canal MoEW Ministry of Environment and Waters MoF Ministry of Finance MP Management Plan MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MWH Montgomery Watson Hauser m/s Metres per second NFB National Forestry Board NGO Non Governmental Organisation NIMH National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology NP Nature
    [Show full text]
  • Translocations of European Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus Citellus) Along Altitudinal Gradient in Bulgaria – an Overview
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Nature ConservationTranslocations 35: 63–95 of European (2019) ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal... 63 doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.35.30911 REVIEW ARTICLE http://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation Translocations of European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal gradient in Bulgaria – an overview Yordan Koshev1, Maria Kachamakova1, Simeon Arangelov2, Dimitar Ragyov1 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 1, Tzar Osvoboditel blvd.; 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Balkani Wildlife Society; 93, Evlogy and Hristo Georgievi blvd.; 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Yordan Koshev ([email protected]) Academic editor: Gabriel Ortega | Received 31 October 2018 | Accepted 15 May 2019 | Published 20 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/B16DBBA5-1B2C-491A-839B-A76CA3594DB6 Citation: Koshev Y, Kachamakova M, Arangelov S, Ragyov D (2019) Translocations of European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) along altitudinal gradient in Bulgaria – an overview. Nature Conservation 35: 63–95. https://doi. org/10.3897/natureconservation.35.30911 Abstract The European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) is a vulnerable species (IUCN) living in open habi- tats of Central and South-eastern Europe. Translocations (introductions, reintroductions and reinforce- ments) are commonly used as part of the European ground squirrel (EGS) conservation. There are numer- ous publications for such activities carried out in Central Europe, but data from South-eastern Europe, where translocations have also been implemented, are still scarce. The present study summarises the methodologies used in the translocations in Bulgaria and analyses the factors impacting their success. Eight translocations of more than 1730 individuals were performed in the period 2010 to 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Report 2020
    MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD ANDAND THE THEFORESTRY FORESTRY ANNUALANNUAL REPORT REPORT MINISTRYMINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD FOOD AND THEAND FORESTRY THE FORESTRY ON THEON STATETHE STATE AND AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT OF OF AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE20202020 2020AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL REPORT REPORT 2020 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY ANNUAL REPORT ON THE STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2020 AGRICULTURAL REPORT) AGRICULTURALСъдържание REPORT 2020 Списък на използваните съкращения 7 РАЗДЕЛ А 11 I. СЪСТОЯНИЕ И РАЗВИТИЕTable of НАContents НАЦИОНАЛНАТА ИКОНОМИКА. М Abbreviation list 6 SECTION A 13 I. STATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK. PLACE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY 13 II. AGRICULTURAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN 2019 AND FORECASTS FOR 2020 19 1. Use of agricultural land and structures in agriculture 19 1.1. Use of agricultural land 19 1.2. Use of agricultural parcels 20 1.2.1. Land Parcel Identification System 20 1.3. Registration of farmers 21 1.4.State Land Fund participation in land relations in Bulgaria 22 1.4.1. Providing SLF Own Terrains for Rent or Lease 22 1.4.2. Distribution of pastures, grasslands and meadows, part of a state or municipal land fund, in accordance with the procedure of Article 37 and the ALOUA 22 1.4.3. Establishment of limited rights in rem over SLF lands 23 1.5. Activities and Contracts for Reinstated Ownership Map and Registers Maintenance 23 1.6. Land Relations 23 1.6.1. Consolidation of Agricultural Land 24 1.7. Agricultural Land Protection Activities 24 2. Economic and Production Results in 2019 and forecast data for 2020 25 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Concerning the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union CM 6657
    European Communities No. 2 (2005) Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union Luxembourg, 25 April 2005 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty August 2005 Cm 6657 £39·60 European Communities No. 2 (2005) Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Restoration of Forest Habitats in 10 Natura 2000 Sites in Bulgaria PDF 13.15 MB
    Project LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF FOREST HABITATS IN 10 NATURA 2000 SITES Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests © Katerina Rakovska / WWF 1 PROJECT DATA PROJECT LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 Conservation and Restoration of 11 Natura 2000 Riparian and Wetland Habitats in 10 SCI’s in Bulgarian Forests, LIFE08 NAT/BG/000281 www.wwf.bg/what_we_do/protected_areas/10parks/news CO-FUNDING: LIFE + Programme (EC financial instrument for the environment). DURATION: January 2010 - June 2014 PROJECT BUDGET: 1 236 834 €, of which 615 199 € EC co-funding PARTNERS: Executive Forestry Agency (EFA), WWF, 10 Nature Park Directorates: Bulgarka, Vitosha, Vrachanski Balkan, Zlatni Pyasatsi, Persina, Rilski Manastir, Rusenski Lom, Sinite Kamani, Strandhza, Shumensko Plato, Sofia Forest Seed-Control Station and Pazardzhik Poplar Station. 2 PROJECT GOALS The project goal was to local trees and shrubs. improve the conservation status Habitat quality improvement was of 10 Sites of Community planned through restoration of Importance (Natura 2000 sites) rare plant species characteristic managed by the Executive of the target habitats. Forestry Agency (EFA) through conservation and restoration of Bulgaria has limited experience 11 riparian and wetland habitats in management and restoration in forests. The total area of target of riverine and wetland habitats. habitats conserved or restored is The current project was an 21 000 ha. The intention was to opportunity to gain experience achieve the conservation of target and share the lessons learnt habitats through placement of through distribution of good specialised infrastructure (fences, practices for conservation and wooden grates, bridges, tourist restoration of habitats in sites spots) in order to restrict human managed by the EFA, which can impact (access of people and be used in other Natura 2000 vehicles).
    [Show full text]
  • Decisión De La Comisión, De 10 De Mayo De 2010, Por La Que Se
    L 121/10 ES Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea 18.5.2010 DECISIONES DECISIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN de 10 de mayo de 2010 por la que se modifican los anexos I y II de la Decisión 2009/861/CE sobre medidas transitorias con arreglo al Reglamento (CE) no 853/2004 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo en lo relativo a la transformación de leche cruda no conforme en determinados establecimientos de transformación de leche de Bulgaria [notificada con el número C(2010) 2953] (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) (2010/276/UE) LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA, (4) El 20 de noviembre de 2009, Bulgaria envió a la Comi­ sión una lista revisada y actualizada de esos estableci­ mientos de transformación de leche. Por tanto, es nece­ Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, sario modificar las listas de establecimientos en los ane­ xos de la Decisión 2009/861/CE. Visto el Reglamento (CE) n o 853/2004 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 29 de abril de 2004, por el que se establecen (5) Como la Decisión 2009/861/CE será aplicable a partir normas específicas de higiene de los alimentos de origen ani­ del 1 de enero de 2010, la presente Decisión debe tam­ 1 mal ( ), y, en particular, su artículo 9, párrafo primero, bién ser aplicable a partir de esa fecha. Considerando lo siguiente: (6) Las medidas previstas en la presente Decisión se ajustan al dictamen del Comité permanente de la cadena alimen­ taria y de sanidad animal. (1) El Reglamento (CE) n o 853/2004 establece normas espe­ cíficas destinadas a los operadores de empresas alimenta­ rias en materia de higiene de los alimentos de origen HA ADOPTADO LA PRESENTE DECISIÓN: animal.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Environment, Providing an Overview of the State of Air, Water and Soil Across the Region
    A Study of Environmental Conflicts and Issues in South-Eastern Europe: Possible Collaboration between CSOs and Ecological Economists A report for the CEECEC project Authors: Biljana Macura, Dragana Bojovic, Miroslav Tadić, Nada Ćosić, Ivana Petrić, Ivan Jarić Jelena Kneževi, Hali Healy, Leah Temper, and Joan Martinez-Alier June 2009 Executive Summary This report, funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework (FP7) Science in Society programme, creates a unique environmental snapshot of South Eastern Europe (SEE), based on an overview of recent international and national research and structured around current concerns of civil society organisations (CSOs) working on environmental conflicts in the region. This ‘snapshot‘ goes on to provide the foundation for a discussion of possible opportunities for collaboration between ecological economists and CSOs in SEE. As the objective of the CEECEC project (www.ceecec.net) is learning and teaching Ecological Economics with and for CSOs, this report aims to provide a resource for ecological economists in the South Eastern European (SEE) region and to examine ecological economics applications that might benefit research and campaign work of environmental CSOs in the region. Following the introduction, Part 2 prepares the ground by depicting the regional and individual national contexts within which CSOs are carrying out their work on environmental conflicts. This includes a brief profiling of the geographies, demographies and economies of the 6 countries that are the focus of the report: Albania, Bosnia and Herzogovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of (FYR) Macedonia and Serbia. This profiling is followed by a summary of international and national research on the state of the environment, providing an overview of the state of air, water and soil across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Balkans and the People
    Issue 05 Financing for Pro-biodiversity For the Balkans and the people The project was presented at the October 2013 businesses Plum Festival in Troyan Monthly bulletin for the activities of “Linking nature conservation and rural development” Project In this issue: Page 1 Briefly for the activities in the issue ANNUAL BIODIVERSITY AWARDS Page 2 Briefly for the activities in the issue During the Annual biodiversity awards Page 3 Annual Biodiversity Awards ceremony, conducted on the Saturday afternoon Student camp For the Balkans Page 4 Farmers from the project region visiting Swiss farms of the 12 of October Her Excellency Mrs. Regina Financing for pro-biodiversity businesses Escher – the ambassador of the Swiss Стр.5 Festival of the local breeds in Kalofer Confederation to Bulgaria handed the traditional Стр.6 Training for PES PMB and visit of Bulgarka Park BBF awards to the winners from the 8 award Forthcoming events categories. Beside the symbolic bell medal the awarded persons received a check for 500 leva as well as presents from the Swiss embassy in The forthcoming signing of the contract for provision of In 2013 the Project For the Balkana and the people Bulgaria. The Annual biodiversity awards were funding for the approved project applications for the participated in the Festival, which took part on organized in the frame of the project “For the Program for support of pro-biodiversity business is September 27-29. The team presented to the Balkan and the people” funded by the Bulgarian scheduled for the beginning of November. “The citizens and guests of Troyan farmers products from Swiss Cooperation program.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibitors List
    Exhibitor Description Elena is a small mountain town, which impresses with its old churches, clock tower, wooden houses and cobbled streets. At the same time Elena is a holly symbol of the Bulgarian revival spirit, a never failing source of patriotism and beauty. Nowadays Elena is a town of new investments, modern alimentary, sartorial and woodworking. Many new hotels and guest houses are located nearby. They are built in the spirit of old architecture in combination with modern style. History of the town of Elena- Elena hollow had carried life in its bosoms as far as 6000 years before Christ. The armies of Philip II and Alexander the Great had passed through the valley. During the Ottoman rule Elena became a big settlement giving shelter to many refugees from different part of Bulgarian Kingdom. Thanks to their patriotic and rebellious spirit the well-off citizens, tradesmen and chorbadjii built massive houses, churches, bridges and fountains. Elena is the only town which during the Renaissance had three churches – “Saint Nicola”, “The Assumption”, and “The Nativity of Holly Virgin”. Nature – The town of Elena is located in the foot of Elena’s Balkan, in Elena River’s valley. The climate is temperate-continental. The air is fresh and favorable to the cure of asthma and lung diseases. Elena is abundant in timber resources. On its territory there are two forest reserves – White Cow reserve with venerable beech forests, karsts sources and high limestone rocks, shaped into picturesque form. The second Haidouk Rocky Peak is a century-old beech where there are also sycamore, spruce, winter oak trees and fern.
    [Show full text]
  • Danubeparks Final Report A4quer 25 07 2014.Indd
    1 Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve 2 Srebarna Nature Reserve 3 Kalimok-Brushlen Protected Site 4 Rusenski Lom Nature Park 5 Persina Nature Park 6 Djerdap National Park 7 Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve 8 Kopački rit Nature Park 9 Lonjsko Polje Nature Park 10 Duna-Dráva National Park 11 Duna-Ipoly National Park 12 Dunajské luhy Protected Landscape Area 13 Záhorie Protected Landscape Area 14 Donau-Auen National Park 15 Donauauwald Neuburg Ingolstadt DANUBEPARKS STEP 2.0 PROJECT REPORT 2012 – 2014 Imprint c/o Donau-Auen National Park 2Schloss Orth, 2304 Orth an der Donau, Austria Project Manager: Georg Frank Phone: +43/2212/3450-19, Fax: +43/2212/3450-17 [email protected] www.danubeparks.org Photos: Daniel Petrescu, Rosenberger, Kovacs, Frank, Leona Valeriu, Baumgartner, Wagner, Manzano, Zinke, Bandacu, Hafner, Hoyer, Nagy, Kern, Suciu, Schmidt, Buchner/Bird- Life, Fiala, Zwefo, Bruck, Kracher, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, Srebarna Nature Reserve, Kalimok-Brushlen Pro- tected Site, Rusenski Lom Nature Park, Persina Nature Park, Djerdap National Park, Gornje Podunavjle Special Nature Reserve, Kopački-rit Nature Park, Lonjsko Polje Nature Park, Duna-Dráva National Park, Duna-Ipoly National Park, BROZ, Donau-Auen Nationalpark, Donauauwald Neuburg Ingol- stadt, ICPDR, Ballnus, Alessandro, Pala, Lebensministerium Layout: Michael Kalb, www.michaelkalb.at Printed by Donau Forum Druck Print run of 1,000. © July 2014. Produced using environmentally-friendly technologies and materials. Errors and omissions excepted. The DANUBEPARKS Network The Danube River hosts immense natural values. officially founded. Since then, much has been well as the tourism industry through DCC (Danube Protected Areas are responsible for the conserva- achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • DBU-Abschlussbericht-AZ-31996.Pdf
    ENDBERICHT zum Projekt Prüfung der Übertragbarkeit eines neu entwickelten, innovativen, nachhaltigen Baustoffs zur thermischen Sanierung von Mehrfamilienhäusern mit Kleineigentümerstruktur in Bulgarien kurz DBU Typha BG AZ 31996 Abbildung 1. Typisches Abbildung 2. Das Typhaboard. typha technik Mehrfamilienhaus aus den 80-ern in Naturbaustoffe Bulgarien. Fraunhofer IBP 31. Juli 2017 M.Sc. Georgi Georgiev Dipl.-Ing. Werner Theuerkorn Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Krus Urban Kaiser M.A. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Nikolay Tuleschkov Prof. Dr.-Ing. Pentscho Dobrev Dipl.-Ing. Plamen Popov ENDBERICHT zum Projekt Prüfung der Übertragbarkeit eines neu entwickelten, innovativen, nachhaltigen Baustoffs zur thermischen Sanierung von Mehrfamilienhäusern mit Kleineigentümerstruktur in Bulgarien kurz DBU Typha BG AZ 31996 Gefördert durch die Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt in der Periode 01.06.2015 – 31.05.2017 31. Juli 2017 M.Sc. Georgi Georgiev | Fraunhofer IBP Dipl.-Ing. Werner Theuerkorn | typha technik Naturbaustoffe Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Krus | Fraunhofer IBP Urban Kaiser M.A. | Fraunhofer IMW Prof. Dr.-Ing. Nikolay Tuleschkov | VSU Prof. Dr.-Ing. Pentscho Dobrev | VSU Dipl.-Ing. Plamen Popov | Sienit Holding 2 10/01 Projektkennblatt der Deutschen Bundesstiftung Umwelt Az 31996/01 Referat 23 Fördersumme 118.141 € Antragstitel Prüfung des nachwachsenden Rohstoffs Typha (Rohrkolben) hin- sichtlich einer Baustoffplattenherstellung und Anwendung in Bulgarien zur thermischen Sanierung und Innendämmung von Gebäudeaußenwänden einschließlich Schulungsmaßnahmen Stichworte Produkt, Ausland, Bauphysik, Baustoff, Dämmung, Bau, nachwachsende Rohstoff Laufzeit Projektbeginn Projektende Projektphase(n) 24 Monate 31.03.2015 29.03.2017 1 Zwischenberichte Bewilligungsemp- typha-technik Naturbaustoffe Tel 08726 4729884 fänger Wichtleiten 3 Fax 08726 4729892 84389 Postmünster Projektleitung Hr. Werner Theuerkorn Bearbeiter Kooperations- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.
    [Show full text]