PROMISES and REALITY Slovak Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PROMISES and REALITY Slovak Economy PROMISES AND REALITY Slovak Economy 1995–1998 Authors: Juraj Borgula Martin Bútora Zora Bútorová Alena Císarová Vladimír Dvořáček Michal Horváth Marek Jakoby Eugen Jurzyca Inez Krautmannová Grigorij Mesežnikov Viktor Nižňanský Peter Pažitný Emília Sičáková Alena Smržová Jaroslava Zapletalová Daniela Zemanovičová Eduard Žitňanský Project Co-ordinators: Marek Jakoby Viktor Nižňanský M.E.S.A. 10 – Center for Economic and Social Analyses Bratislava 1998 -2- M.E.S.A. 10 – Center for Economic and Social Analyses is an economic think tank created in 1992 with the main objective of supporting economic and social transformation to make the Slovak Republic a modern and prosperous society. M.E.S.A. 10 develops analyses, does monitoring, prepare studies, comments on current economic policy, organizes lectures, discussion clubs, conferences and seminars on macro- economy, social issues, privatization, fiscal decentralization issues. Board of Directors Ivan Mikloš, Jana Červenáková, Pavol Kinčeš, František Kurej, Viktor Nižňanský, Gabriel Palacka, Vladimír Rajčák, Juraj Stern, František Šebej Executive Director Viktor Nižňanský M.E.S.A. 10 Hviezdoslavovo námestie 17, 811 02 Bratislava Phone: (421 – 7) 54435328 Fax: (421 – 7) 54432189 E-mail: mesa10&internet.sk Home page: http://www.mesa10.sk This publication was issued due to a kind support of the Open Society Foundation. M.E.S.A. 10 thanks Ivan Miklos for his initiative in creating this publication and for the possibility to use his analyses in this publication. M.E.S.A. 10 thanks to the Institute for Public Affairs and to Creative Department for co-operation and assistance in issuing this publication. © M.E.S.A. 10 - Center for Economic and Social Analyses, Bratislava 1998 -3- TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. 5 SOCIAL AND POLITICAL BACKGROUND Martin Bútora; Grigorij Mesežnikov; Zora Bútorová Diagnosis that will not let you go............................................................................................... 8 MISSION STATEMENT M.E.S.A.10 Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Part of the Government Declaration (Mission Statement) of V. Mečiar´s Government ................................................................................... 22 RESULTS ACHIEVED OR AN ECONOMIC MIRACLE? Peter Pažitný; Marek Jakoby Economic environment ............................................................................................................ 31 Eugen Jurzyca; Emília Syčáková Transparency in Economy of the Slovak Republic and Protection of Competition ................ 35 M.E.S.A.10 Privatization ............................................................................................................................. 46 Vladimír Dvořáček The National Property Fund of the Slovak Republic ............................................................... 63 Eugen Jurzyca Natural Monopolies – Family Silver of Silver of Some Families?......................................... 70 Viktor Nižňanský Public Administration .............................................................................................................. 76 Alena Smržová Rating of the Economy of the Slovak Republic....................................................................... 82 Marek Jakoby Economic Growth .................................................................................................................... 87 Marek Jakoby Efficiency and Competitiveness of Industry ............................................................................ 90 Juraj Borgula Engineering Industry................................................................................................................ 98 Marek Jakoby; Inez Krautmannová Foreign trade .......................................................................................................................... 107 -4- Peter Pažitný Foreign Investment................................................................................................................. 116 Daniela Zemanovičová; Emília Sičáková Small and Medium Size Businesses....................................................................................... 126 Peter Pažitný; Alena Cisárová Unemployment ....................................................................................................................... 133 Marek Jakoby Inflation .................................................................................................................................. 139 Eduard Žitňanský Banking sector........................................................................................................................ 141 Michal Horváth Capital market ........................................................................................................................ 147 Viktor Nižňanský Public Sector Debt.................................................................................................................. 152 Marek Jakoby Foreign Debt........................................................................................................................... 157 Jaroslava Zapletalová Housing Policy ....................................................................................................................... 160 Peter Pažitný Standard of Living.................................................................................................................. 170 CONCLUSION M.E.S.A.10 Recovery Program Starting Points and Outline ..................................................................... 181 Register of figures .................................................................................................................. 189 Register of graphs................................................................................................................... 191 Authors ................................................................................................................................... 192 -5- FOREWORD This publication is intended for those who wish to look into the mirror of economic miracle that was promised by Mečiar’s third government at the time of its coming into power, in 1994. The publication presents the views of the independent M.E.S.A. 10 staff and its part-time associates, on the development of the individual sectors of the Slovak economy in the past four years. At the time of coming into power, in 1994, the government committed itself to numerous positive plans and objectives. However, practical steps that followed oftentimes contradicted the original statements. Even worse was the fact that the steps were at variance with the valid laws and the principles of the State of law, and the fundamentals of fairness and ethics. The outcome of the four years in question have been grave problems practically in all the economic sectors, concealed under the tinsel of positive macroeconomic indicators. It is the HZDS-ZRS-SNS trefoil (i.e. the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia, the Association of the Workers of Slovakia, and the Slovak National Party) that has impeded the process of Slovakia approaching the advanced democratic countries and prompted the establishment of an autocratic regime with a command model of the management of public matters. The objective of this publication is not only to pinpoint the instances when the law was broken, mistakes made, and the development of the Slovak economy distorted in the years 1994-1998. The authors have endeavoured, in addition to the analysis of the development and its consequences, to also provide an outline of the measures of the recovery process for the nearest future, from both the short and medium-term perspectives. The Slovak economy, after four years of V. Mečiar’s government, is faced with a particularly difficult situation, whereby the early analyses of M. Dzurinda’s Cabinet conducted across the individual sectors indicate that the condition of our economy is even more alarming than originally assumed at the time of the pre-election campaign. Fully exposed is not only the actual condition of the public but also the private sector, and it has become apparent how the percolating political and economic power played tricks on the citizens – electorate, tax payers, and employees, and how this power has been living at the expense of the generations to come. Slovakia, as an independent State, has been indebted and deprived of its assets. The growth of the regional differences in economy has been appalling over the past four years, which, in turn, has negatively impacted the citizens’ standard of living. The dangerous model of conduct, supportive of corruption, the percolation of political and economic power, and criminality in economy, got its way. If these trends are not halted and the consequences of the hitherto development are not gradually rectified, it is obvious that ultimately, the Slovak economy will lose its competitiveness in the globalizing and liberalizing world economy, which would bring about all the adverse economic and social consequences. The hitherto approach is no longer sustainable, and the situation calls for addressing the problems that have piled up and for “settling the debt” generated by the activity of V. Mečiar’s government. The rehabilitation process will inevitably entail unpopular measures, such as price deregulation, austerity programs and cutting down public expenditure, and even the devalutation of Slovak crown, if need be.
Recommended publications
  • State of the Environment Report - Slovak Republic 2012
    FOREWORD FOREWORD Few people today realize that the environment is a conditioning factor for the existence of each one of us. All of its components and ecosystems influence its trend. Their situation today is changing not only within the local and regional scope, but also at the global level. Several places have shown improved quality of the environment thanks to building the environmental infrastructure. Through implementing legal, educational, economic, organisational, and other instruments we have been trying to increase environmental safety, appropriateness, loading capacity, usability, and aesthetics. These include also building flood protection facilities in areas with the highest risk of floods in Slovakia. The world is facing environmental threats of global magnitude. These include, for example, impacts provoked by the changed climate or gradual depletion of selected strategic natural resources. All of this occurs also in consequence of a continuing rise in the world´s population that exceeded the number of seven billion people. In many countries, this has spurred phenomena such as starvation, poverty, devastation of land and marine ecosystems, reduction of biodiversity, excessive exploitation of minerals, and enormous air pollution, water contamination and environmental pollution by waste. The UN Conference for sustainable development - RIO + 20 organized in Rio de Janeiro in 2012 addressed the already mentioned as well as other issues. The Conference hosted also the Slovak delegation. This global conference of the highest rank analysed the possibilities of reducing the impacts of adverse environmental situation in social and economic aspects and proposed measures for its improvement and for securing sustainable development. Following the global RIO+20 conference, the European Union prepared its 7th Environmental Action Plan by 2020 (7.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Next weekend in New Direction 10th Anniversary Dinner p.22 BORDEAUX p.20 ACRE Summer Gala Dinner p.23 Issue #8 | July 2019 A fortnightly Newspaper by the Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) | theconservative.online THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION by Jan Zahradil MEP, President of ACRE For the next five years, we aim to serve as the peoples voice, acting as a counter balance between those who want a federal Europe, and those who want to destroy the Union. We will continue to defend the view that Europe works best when it does less, but it does it better. ith the elec- power handed to those who which would have create a in a position to act as the offi- comes as a result of keeping tion now out of want to use it to build a federal more business friendly Europe. cial opposition in the European power as close to the people as Spitzenkandidat the way, and the Europe. A coalition that will That would have put the sin- Parliament. We’ll hold this new possible. And we remain com- JAN ZAHRADIL political groups be led from the left, with any gle market, rather than social coalition to account, and ensure mitted to the view that our nowW establishing themselves, we voting majority dependent on policy, back at the centre of the that they do not use their new strength comes from a willing- Jan Zahradil was ACRE’s can- can now talk with some clarity the support of the Greens and European Union. That would majority to take power away ness to work together on issues didate for the Presidency of the about what the next five years the socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Hodnotenie Kvality Ovzdušia V Slovenskej Republike 2006
    Slovenský hydrometeorologický ústav – odbor Kvalita ovzdušia HHOODDNNOOTTEENNIIEE KKVVAALLIITTYY OOVVZZDDUUŠŠIIAA VV SSLLOOVVEENNSSKKEEJJ RREEPPUUBBLLIIKKEE 22000066 Finálna verzia Bratislava september 2007 AIR POLLUTION ASSESSMENT IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC – 2006 RESUME Slovak air protection legislation is fully identical with the relevant EU legislation. The results of air pollution monitoring in Slovakia in 2006 are summarised in the presented report. Content 1. Partition of the Slovak territory – Status to 31. 12. 2006 1.1 Zones and agglomerations 1.2 List of zones and agglomerations 1.3 List of air quality management areas 2. Monitoring network – Status in 2006 3. Air pollution assessment in zones and agglomerations 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Description of network and statistical analysis of local sources contribution to PM10 3.3 Agglomeration Bratislava 3.4 Agglomeration Košice 3.5 Zone – Banská Bystrica Region 3.6 Zone – Bratislava Region 3.7 Zone – Košice Region 3.8 Zone – Nitra Region 3.9 Zone – Prešov Region 3.10 Zone – Trenčín Region 3.11 Zone – Trnava Region 3.12 Zone – Žilina Region 3.13 Summary 4. Ground level ozone 4.1 Results 4.2 Conclusions 5. Results of air pollution modelling completed to 31. 12. 2006 5.1 Description of the applied models 5.2 Results 5.3 Conclusions 6. Air quality assessment – conclusions 6.1 Classification of zones and agglomeration 6.2 Specification of air quality management areas 6.3 Conclusions Annex 1 Monitoring network – meta data The territory of Slovakia was partitioned into 8 zones (identical with administrative regions) and 2 agglomerations (the largest cities Bratislava and Košice). In 2006 there were specified 20 air quality management areas (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Vinohradníctvo Weinbau Viniculture
    nitrianska oblasť Oblasť Trnavského regiónu mala pre pestovanie vína popri region neutra • nitra Wine-making area vyhovujúcich geograficko-klimatických podmienkach aj výhod- Trnavský samosprávny kraj nú strategickú polohu, pretože ňou od praveku prechádzala ob- Der Selbstwerwaltungslandesteil Trnava chodná cesta, známa v rímskej dobe ako jantárová. K obľúbeným Trnava Self-Governing Region obchodným artiklom patrilo i víno. Trnavský samosprávny kraj sa čiastočne prekrýva s Malokarpatskou vinohradníckou oblas- ťou, Južnoslovenskou vinohradníckou oblasťou a Nitrianskou vi- nohradníckou oblasťou. Die Region Tyrnau (Trnava) hatte für den Weinbau neben den ausgezeichneten geographischen und klimatischen Bedin- gungen auch eine vorteilhafte strategische Lage, weil seit dem vinohradníctvo Altertum eine Handelsstraße durch dieses Gebiet führte, die in der Römerzeit als Bernsteinstraße bekannt war. Zu einem belieb- ten Handelsartikel zählte auch der Wein. Der Regierungsbezirk Weinbau Tyrnau wird teilweise vom Weinbaugebiet der Kleinen Karpaten, itrianska vinohradnícka oblasť sa vyznačuje pestrosťou vom Südslowakischen Weinbaugebiet und vom Weinbaugebiet produkovaných odrôd, práve vzhľadom na rôznorodé pôd- N Neutra (Nitra) bedeckt. viniculture ne a klimatické pomery. Do Trnavského kraja zasahuje Šintavský vinohradnícky rajón, v ktorom je 16 vinohradníckych obcí. Šin- tava má vynikajúce predpoklady na výrobu ojedinelých odrodo- Trnava Region has a history with wine making due to not vo charakteristických vín. only a suitable geo-climatic, but also a favourable strategic posi- Das Weinbaugebiet Neutra zeichnet sich gerade mit Blick auf tion on an ancient, pre-historic trade route known in the Roman die vielfältigen Boden- und Klimaverhältnisse durch die Vielfalt times as “an amber route”. And wine was among the commonly der angebauten Rebsorten aus. Bis in die Region Tyrnau reicht traded goods.
    [Show full text]
  • City Parks and Gardens the Forest in the City
    ZÁHORSKÁ BYSTRICA www.visitbratislava.com/green Lesopark DEVÍNSKA NOVÁ VES Cycling Bridge Malé Karpaty of Freedom 9 11 20 RAČA Morava 10 21 Devínska Kobyla 19 DÚBRAVKA LAMAČ VAJNORY LEGEND Vydrica 13 DEVÍN 12 1 Hviezdoslavovo námestie Devín 2 Šafárikovo námestie Castle 18 3 Medical Garden Danube IVANKA PRI DUNAJI 4 Grassalkovich Garden 5 Sad Janka Kráľa NOVÉ MESTO 6 Baroque Garden 8 KARLOVA VES 7 Botanical Garden EUROVELO 6 5 EUROVELO 13 8 Horský park Sad Janka Kráľa on the right bank statues depicting the 4 RUŽINOV VRAKUŇA A prominent landmark in the Koliba sec- summer bobsled track City Parks and Gardens 14 7 3 The Forest in the City of the Danube is the oldest public park zodiac signs, a gazebo STARÉ 9 Červený kríž tion of the forest park is Kamzík (439 with lift, treetop rope MESTO 6 10 Dlhé lúky 12 Take a break from the urban bustle and hustle and discover in Central Europe. It was established from the original Fran- EUROVELO 6 1 2 In just a few minutes find yourself in the silence of nature, meters) , whose television tower is course featuring 42 cozy, green corners right in the city center. in 1774-1776. The park has walkways ciscan church tower, 11 Kačín walking on forest roads and green meadows. perched on the peak of the ridge. Take in obstacles, World War I 16 5 shaded by trees and spacious mead- a playground with Pečniansky les 12 Koliba - Kamzík a panoramic view of the surrounding area era artillery bunker th 13 The history of these parks goes back to the 18 century, and today they are ows.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Form
    Application form European Entrepreneurial Regions (EER) Pilot scheme 1. Contact details Applicant region Trnava Self‐Governing Region Name of the person in charge Tibor Mikuš with the project President Postal address Starohájska 10 917 01 Trnava Slovakia Telephone +421335559100 e‐mail predseda@trnava‐vuc.sk Website www.trnava‐vuc.sk EER year 2011 EER year 2012 2. Presentation of the political vision 1 Trnava Self‐Governing Region, the smallest region in the Slovak Republic, has a population of more than 558,807 (as of 31 December 2008). Administratively it consists of seven districts (Dunajská Streda, Galanta, Hlohovec, Piešťany, Senica, Skalica, and Trnava). It has 251 municipalities; 2 the population density is 133.6 inhabitants per km . The unemployment rate last year was approximately 6%. The gross domestic product per capita was around EUR 18,000, which represents more than 100% of the average for the Slovak Republic. The TSGR is one of the Slovak Republic’s most successful regions in the field of foreign direct investment (PSA Peugeot Citroën, Samsung Electronics Slovakia, Samsung LCD Slovakia and others). The TSGR can be described as an industrial and agricultural region. The Slovak Government has set three poles of growth for the TSGR in terms of industrial sectors: the automotive, electronics and energy industries. SWOT analysis of the Industry Development Strategy Strengths Weaknesses significant diversification of the industrial base high dependence on key industry leaders in the region the existence of industry leaders,
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Commissioner Varhelyi on EU Finanial Assistance
    To the Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations Olivér Várhelyi 26/10/2020 Dear Commissioner Várhelyi, We are writing to you to express our concern at reports about the way the European Commission is intending to distribute EUR 53 million in financial assistance to Belarus. We express our admiration for the courage and resolve shown by the Belarusian people during the COVID-19 pandemic, and note that the European Union and its Member States stood in solidarity with the people of Belarus, providing financial and material support through bilateral and regional programmes and instruments. All this has taken place in the context of the Belarusian authorities’ lethargic response, and even denials of the pandemic and its impact, all the while increasing repression against its own people in the context of the presidential elections. The presidential election, marred by widespread violations and a campaign of repression which is on-going to this day, has demonstrated the true brutality of the Lukashenka regime and its disregard for the Belarusian people. It is in this context that we strongly urge the Commission to i) apply a ‘less for less’ principle with regards to the Belarusian authorities until all political prisoners are released, fundamental human rights are respected and free and fair elections take place, all the while pursuing a 'more for more' principle with regards to the Belarusian civil society; ii) be creative with the disbursement of funds through relevant instruments and implementing partners; and iii) allow more flexibility in project implementation given the changing circumstances. The Foreign Affairs Council of 12th October 2020 called for the recalibration of EU bilateral financial assistance to Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Bratislava in Numbers
    The Self-Governing Region of Bratislava in numbers Department of strategy, regional development and project management 2 Location Region in the heart of Europe Developmental Concept of the EU 3 4 Settlement Structure • Area: 2 052,6 km² (the smallest region) • Percentage of population living in cities Malacky 82,07 % Districts : 8 (Bratislava I – V, Malacky, Modra • Stupava Pezinok Pezinok, Senec) Svätý Jur • Villages: 73 Senec Bratislava • Cities : 7 (capital of the SR Bratislava, Malacky, Stupava, Pezinok, Sv. Jur, Modra, Senec) 5 Demography • Population: 618 380 (11,42 % of overall population of the SR) • Density of settlement : 301,2 men/km² • Highest degree of urbanisation: 80,58 % • Percentage of region‘s population living in Bratislava : 67,49 % (417 389) • 42 towns with population lower than 2000 Locality Population Share [%] • 31 towns with population over 2000 Bratislava 417 389 67,49 Ethnic Composition I-V • Slovaks : 95,1 % Malacky 69 222 11,19 while out of 5088 people of other Pezinok 59 602 9,64 nationality comprise Czechs 24,9%; Hungarians 6,3 %; Poles 6,8%; Senec 72 167 11,68 Germans 5,8 % and Ukrainians 4,3 % Source : Štatistický úrad Slovenskej republiky, Dostupné k 31.3 2014 Transport 6 ● Motorways – D1 (planned widening), D2, planned motorway D4 and express road R7 ● Railways - 248.848 km of track(single track: 49.524 km; double track: 199.324 km); (Lines no.: 100, 101, 110, 112, 113, 120, 130, 131 and 132) ● M R Stefanik International Airport ● Danube, Morava and Small Danube ● International cycle routes EV13/6/existing
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Transfer Potential Assessment and Planning Report for Trnava Region Action No
    3sCE417P3 Introduction of Regional Energy Concepts Energy transfer potential assessment and planning report for Trnava region Action No. 3.3.2 publicity November 2014 public internet print non public This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF The sole responsibility for the content of this [webpage, publication etc.] lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT: Energy Transfer Potential Assessment 1. Description of the electricity network of Trnava region .............................................. 3 Interregional network .................................................................................................................... 4 2. Available regional excess reenwable energy ............................................................... 7 Demand .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Production .................................................................................................................................... 10 Balances ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Imports and exports of electricity ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regiăłn Bratislava GB.Indd
    Bratislava Region Región Bratislava GB.indd 1 14.11.2008 14:01:59 Výtažková azurováVýtažková purpurováVýtažková žlutáVýtažková ìerná LittleBigCountry Región Bratislava GB.indd 2 14.11.2008 14:02:02 Výtažková azurováVýtažková purpurováVýtažková žlutáVýtažková ìerná The Bratislava Region lies in West and Southwest Slovakia, and contains the southern part of the Little Carpathian Mountains, the Záhorie Lowlands and the Danube Lowlands. Its neighbours are the Trnava Region in the north and east, Hungary in the south, and Austria and the Czech Republic in the west. The Slovak capital Bratislava is the natural centre of the region in terms of political, economic and social life. Región Bratislava GB.indd 3 14.11.2008 14:02:12 Výtažková azurováVýtažková purpurováVýtažková žlutáVýtažková ìerná Bratislava With a favourable geographical position, the Bratislava Region services focus on the local history, culture and traditions, is an important venue for tourism which has become a crucial catering, shopping and congress tourism. The area along part of the local economy. Although relatively modest in size, the river Danube is traditionally associated with water, and the region boasts beautiful and diverse nature and excellent the place is ideal for summer holidays, water tourism and infrastructure, which makes it a place offering ample opportunity fi shing. for the growth of tourism. In particular, Bratislava‘s tourism Región Bratislava GB.indd 4 14.11.2008 14:02:17 Výtažková azurováVýtažková purpurováVýtažková žlutáVýtažková ìerná Bratislava Old Town SNP Bridge The Záhorie region is especially known for its natural beauties, historical monuments, and ample opportunities for water sports and relaxation. The Little Carpathian Mountains have a considerable reputation for wine growing and rich traditions of folk art.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Region on the Danube Content
    Metropolitan Region on the Danube Content Content ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 About Slovakia ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Bratislava Region ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 International Context ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Population .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Transport and Accessibility ................................................................................................................................ 7 Economy ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Tourism and Culture ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]