DOCSLIB.ORG

Report the Commission of Enquiry Into The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report the Commission of Enquiry Into The REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY INTO THE EXTRADITION REQUEST FOR CHRISTOPHER COKE The Commission of Enquiry was appointed by the Governor General Sir Patrick th Allen O.N., GCMG, C.D. on October 19 , 2010. The three Commissioners appointed were: Hon. Emil George Q.C. O.J. - Chairman Hon. Anthony Irons O.J. Mr. Donald Scharshmidt Q.C. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. To enquire into: (a) The issue relating to the extradition of Christopher Coke by the Government of the United States of America; (b) The manner and procedure in which the said extradition request was handled by the Government of Jamaica and the role and conduct of the various public officials who handled the extradition request; (c) The circumstances in which the services of the law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips were engaged in relation to any or all of the matters involved, by whom were they engaged and on whose behalf they were authorized to act; 1 (d) Whether there was any misconduct on the part of any person in any of these matters and, if so, to make recommendations as the Commission sees fit for the referral of such persons to the relevant authority or disciplinary body for appropriate action. 2. The Commission shall make a full and faithful report and recommendations concerning the aforesaid matters and transmit the same to the Governor General on or before February 28, 2011. 3. The provisions of the Commission of Enquiry Act shall be applicable for the purposes of this enquiry. 4. The Commission may hold public and private hearings in such manner and in such locations as may be necessary and convenient. 2 REPRESENTATION Our first sitting was Monday, December 6, 2010, at the Jamaica Conference Centre in Kingston and the following counsel appeared for named parties: They were: a) Mr. Garth McBean -Legal Counsel to Commission Mrs. Symone Mayhew Mr. Stewart Stimpson b) Mr. Patrick Bailey -Representing Dr. Robinson, former Min. Ms. Kathryn Phipps of State, Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Ms. Audrey Betholdi Foreign Trade & Mr. Hugh Small, Q.C. -Representing the Prime Minister Ms. Sherrie-Ann McGregor The Honourable Bruce Golding c) Senator K.D. Knight, Q.C. -Representing the Peoples National Party Mr. Leonard Green Senator AJ. Nicholson, Q.C. Ms. Valerie Neita-Robinson d) Mr. Patrick Atkinson, Q.C. -Representing Dr. Peter Phillips Ms. Deborah Martin e) Dr. Lloyd Barnett -Representing Senator Dorothy Dr. Adolph Edwards Lightbourne 3 f) Mr. Frank Phipps, a.c. -Representing the Jamaica Labour Party Ms. Marion Roberts g} Mr. John Vassell, a.c. -Representing Senator Dwight Nelson Mrs Julianne Maise-Cox Ms. Cindy Lightbourne h} Mr. Winston Spaulding a.c. -Representing Solicitor General Douglas Mr. Oliver Smith Leys j} Lord Anthony Gifford, a.c. -Representing Jeremy Taylor, Deputy DPP Ms. Paula Llewllyn, a.c. k} Mr. R.N.A Henriques, a.c. -Representing Mr. Lackston Robinson Ms. Daniella Silvera Deputy Solicitor General 4 LIST OF WITNESSES 1. AMBASSADOR EVADNEY COYE 2. MRS. HEATHER COOKE 3. MR. HERMAN LaMONT 4. MR. HAROLD BRADY 5. MR. JEREMY TAYLOR 6. MRS. LISA PALMER-HAMILTON 7. MR. DARYL VAZ 8. REAR ADMIRAL HARDLEY LEWIN 9. MR. DOUGLAS LEYS 10. MAJOR GENERAL STUART SAUNDERS 11.LT. COL. PATRICK COLE 12. DR. RONALD ROBINSON 13. MR. KARL SAMUDA 14. DR PETER PHILLIPS 15.SENATOR DWIGHT NELSON 16.1VIR. LACKSTON ROBINSON 17. SENATOR DOROTHY UGHTBOURNE 18. MRS. MARCIA BEVERLEY 19.MRS. VERNA McGAW 20. HON . BRUCE GOLDING 5 NOTES ON PROCEDURE At our meeting on the 6th of December, 2010 we issued directions as to the manner in which the Commission would operate. 1. All parties and all witnesses appearing before the Enquiry have the right to counsel. 2. Each party has the right to have its counsel cross-examine any witnesses who testified. 3. All parties have the right to apply to the Commission to have a witness called whom the Commission had elected not to call. 4. All parties have the right to receive copies of all documents entered in evidence and the right to introduce their own documentary evidence. 5. All hearings will be held in public unless application was made to preserve the confidentiality of information. 6. We ordered that Statements from the witnesses should be in not h later than January t , 2011. h 7. Hearings should commence on January 1t , 2011. 8. A notice to be published in both the daily newspapers: The Daily Gleaner and the Daily Observer that all persons who were able to give us information should come forward and provide us with a statement. Only two parties gave in statements by January 7, 6 2011. We got the remainder of the statements within the following weeks. Accordingly we commenced the hearing on the 1ih January, 2011. Most witnesses had their Counsel and each witness was subject to cross examination by the lawyers representing the other parties. This procedure lengthened the hearings, especially in some cases, but it enabled us to elicit facts which would otherwise not be·available. 7 INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Who was Christopher Coke? 3. The Interception of Communications Act and the Memoranda of Understanding 3.1 The Interception of Communications Act 3.2 The Relevant Facts 3.3 The Supply of the Intercepted Communications to the United States' Authorities 3.4 The Memoranda of Understanding 3.5 Memorandum of Understanding 1 ("MOU 1") 3.6 Memorandum of Understanding 2 ("MOU 2") 3.7 Construction of the Interception of Communications Act in relation to the MOUs 4. What validity was there in the claim that Mr. Coke's Constitutional Rights were infringed? 4.1 The Constitutional Right to Freedom of Expression 4.2 The Interception of Communications Act 4.3 The Constitutional Immunity from expulsion from Jamaica 4.4 The Extradition Act 5. Should the Minister have signed the authority to proceed promptly? 5.1 The Meaning of Section 8(3) of the Act 5.2 Did the Minister have the discretion to sign the authority to proceed under Section 8(3)? 5.3 The authorities 6. Who engaged Manatt, Phelps and Phillips? Why was Manatt, Phelps and Phillips engaged? 7. Did the Prime Minister and other persons act properly in instructing Manatt, Phelps and Phillips? 8. Did the Minister act reasonably in signing the authority to proceed at the time and in the circumstances in which she did? 8 9. Credibility of Witnesses 10. Account of The Input of Public Officials 11. Misconduct 12. The Conduct of Counsel at the Enquiry 13. Recommendations 14. Thanks to Dr. Kirton and The Secretariat 9 a) INTRODUCTION In August 2009 the US Government requested the extradition of Mr.Christopher Coke, who was charged with conspiracy to transport illegal narcotics into the US and with trafficking in illegal firearms. The request was accompanied by an indictment issued by a Judge of the US Southern District of New York. The Jamaican Government claimed that certain aspects of the request breached Jamaican laws and treaties. This was emphatically denied by the US authorities. The fact that the request had been made and not complied with became common knowledge in Jamaica, and civil society demanded Mr. Coke's arrest and extradition. There was much media comment concerning Mr.Coke's alleged leadership of the notorious Shower Posse, situated in Tivoli Gardens, and his reputed affiliation to the Jamaica Labour Party. As the months passed, and the Government continued to decline to extradite Mr. Coke, citing various issues it said precluded the extradition, it was increasingly suggested in the media, by the Opposition, and by civil sOciety that the Government was deliberately stalling the extradition process to protect Mr.Coke. In response to the pressure, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice brought proceedings for a declaration, seeking approval of her manner of dealing with the extradition request, and naming the Leader of the Opposition and the President of the PSOJ as Defendants as well as Mr. Christopher Coke. The proceedings failed because it was withdrawn against 2nd Defendant and 10 the 3rd Defendant was not served. Pressure from civil society, the media, the Opposition, and allegedly from the United States, forced the Government to review its position and to comply with the request to extradite Mr. Coke to the United States. Once the Authority to Proceed was signed, gunmen who had fortified Tivoli Gardens launched a massive attack on JCF stations. The JDF and JCF attempted to arrest Mr. Coke, and were met with sustained armed resistance. Mr. Coke was finally apprehended and extradited without contest in June 2010. 11 b) WHO WAS CHRISTOPHER COKE? SUMMARY 1. Head of the Shower Posse, criminal organization with international operations, based in Tivoli Gardens, West Kingston. 2. "Don" of Tivoli Gardens, wielding such power as to exercise influence across political jines. 3. Construction contractor. In his evidence, Dr. Peter Phillips, who was Minister of National Security 2001 to 2007, said that intelligence reports regarded Mr. Coke as head of the Shower Posse (pages 52 - 54, Transcript of Enquiry, 15th February, 2011). The Shower Posse was a highly organized gang; it had connections in the US, Canada, UK, with linkages in the Caribbean, South America, Central America, including Mexico. Its activities included: 1. Trafficking in illegal narcotics 2. Gun smuggling 3. Money laundering 4. Murder for Hire 5. Extortion 6. Transport of drugs through Jamaica to the United States. The Shower Posse offered services to other criminal organizations. Its headquarters was in Tivoli Gardens but "the links within other criminal organizations spanned political divisions." 12 The Prime Minister said that he first met Mr. Coke when he became MP in 2005 for the constituency of West Kingston.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Massacre in Jamaica
    A REPORTER AT LARGE A MASSACRE IN JAMAICA After the United States demanded the extradition of a drug lord, a bloodletting ensued. BY MATTATHIAS SCHWARTZ ost cemeteries replace the illusion were preparing for war with the Jamai- told a friend who was worried about an of life’s permanence with another can state. invasion, “Tivoli is the baddest place in illusion:M the permanence of a name On Sunday, May 23rd, the Jamaican the whole wide world.” carved in stone. Not so May Pen Ceme- police asked every radio and TV station in tery, in Kingston, Jamaica, where bodies the capital to broadcast a warning that n Monday, May 24th, Hinds woke are buried on top of bodies, weeds grow said, in part, “The security forces are ap- to the sound of sporadic gunfire. over the old markers, and time humbles pealing to the law-abiding citizens of FreemanO was gone. Hinds anxiously di- even a rich man’s grave. The most for- Tivoli Gardens and Denham Town who alled his cell phone and reached him at saken burial places lie at the end of a dirt wish to leave those communities to do so.” the house of a friend named Hugh Scully, path that follows a fetid gully across two The police sent buses to the edge of the who lived nearby. Freeman was calm, and bridges and through an open meadow, neighborhood to evacuate residents to Hinds, who had not been outside for far enough south to hear the white noise temporary accommodations. But only a three days, assumed that it was safe to go coming off the harbor and the highway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980
    The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980 Kareen Felicia Williams Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 Copyright 2011 Kareen Williams All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980 Kareen Williams By the 1960s violence became institutionalized in modern Jamaican politics. This endemic violence fostered an unstable political environment that developed out of a symbiotic relationship between Jamaican labor organizations and political violence. Consequently, the political process was destabilized by the corrosive influence of partisan politics, whereby party loyalists dependent on political patronage were encouraged by the parties to defend local constituencies and participate in political conflict. Within this system the Jamaican general election process became ominous and violent, exemplifying how limited political patronage was dispersed among loyal party supporters. This dissertation examines the role of the political parties and how they mobilized grassroots supporters through inspirational speeches, partisan ideology, complex political patronage networks, and historic party platform issues from 1940 through 1980. The dissertation argues that the development of Jamaican trade unionism and its corresponding leadership created the political framework out of which Jamaica’s two major political parties, the Jamaica Labor Party (JLP) and People’s National Party
    [Show full text]
  • The Transnationalization of Garrisons in the Case of Jamaica Michelle Angela Munroe M Munroe [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2013 The aD rk Side of Globalization: The Transnationalization of Garrisons in the Case of Jamaica Michelle Angela Munroe [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI13120610 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Munroe, Michelle Angela, "The aD rk Side of Globalization: The rT ansnationalization of Garrisons in the Case of Jamaica" (2013). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 996. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/996 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida THE DARK SIDE OF GLOBALIZATION: THE TRANSNATIONALIZATION OF GARRISONS IN THE CASE OF JAMAICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICAL SCIENCE by Michelle Angela Munroe 2013 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Science This dissertation, written by Michelle Angela Munroe, and entitled The Dark Side of Globalization: The Transnationalization of Garrisons in the Case of Jamaica, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Ronald W. Cox _______________________________________ Felix Martin _______________________________________ Nicol C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the War on Drugs on Security, Legitimacy, And
    The Impact of the War on Drugs on Security, Legitimacy, and Sovereignty in Jamaica: A Case Study of the 2010 Extradition of Christopher “Dudus” Coke By Madeleine Bair A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International and Area Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Percy C. Hintzen, Chair Professor Alan L. Karras Professor Michel S. Laguerre Fall 2011 © 2011 Madeleine Bair All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations………………………………………………………………………………. ii Timeline……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. iii Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 A Review of the Literature………………………………………………………………………... 2 Outline of Paper……………………………………………………………………………………... 12 Methodology………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 Chapter 2: Jamaica on the Drug Map………………………………………………………………….. 15 Cocaine & the Caribbean…………………………..…………………………………………….. 15 Trafficking & Instability………………………………………………………………………….. 17 International Drug Policy…………………………………………………...................……….. 19 Narco‐Imperialism…………………………………………………………………………………. 21 Adding up the Results…………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Chapter 3: An Extradition Request & A Long Delay……...……...……………………………… 24 The Response………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Why the Resistance?............................................................................................................... 28 Capitulation…………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • CRIMINALITY and RESILIENCE Rocky Point, Jamaica
    RESEARCH REPORT CRIMINALITY AND RESILIENCE Rocky Point, Jamaica EMMA WITBOOI FEBRUARY 2020 Rocky Point, Jamaica CRIMINALITY AND RESILIENCE Rocky Point, Jamaica W Emma Witbooi February 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report draws on information generously provided by a large number of interviewees, the majority of whom wish to remain anonymous but whom I would nevertheless like to thank. A special thank you to Peter and Velia Espeut for their warm hospitality in Jamaica, and to Peter in particular for his knowledgeable input on all matters Jamaican and for introducing me to the Caribbean Coastal Area Management Foundation (C-CAM) which he founded, and of which he was the first Executive Director. I owe particular thanks to Ingrid Parchment, current C-CAM Executive Director, for facilitating access to the Rocky Point fishing community and for graciously hosting me at C-CAM’s Lionel Town office and Salt River station. Thanks also to Peter Murray of the Caribbean Community for his regional (fisheries) insights. We would like to thank the Government of Norway for their support in funding this report. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Emma Witbooi has a doctorate in marine and environmental law from University College London, and has published and presented widely in the field of fisheries crime. She is a research associate at the Nelson Mandela University, South Africa, and consults for the UNODC and UNDP. She is the lead author of the Blue Paper 16 Organized Crime in the Fisheries Sector for the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy and a director of the independent fisheries crime research network PescaDOLUS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980 Kareen Felicia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980 Kareen Felicia Williams Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 Copyright 2011 Kareen Williams All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The Evolution of Political Violence in Jamaica 1940-1980 Kareen Williams By the 1960s violence became institutionalized in modern Jamaican politics. This endemic violence fostered an unstable political environment that developed out of a symbiotic relationship between Jamaican labor organizations and political violence. Consequently, the political process was destabilized by the corrosive influence of partisan politics, whereby party loyalists dependent on political patronage were encouraged by the parties to defend local constituencies and participate in political conflict. Within this system the Jamaican general election process became ominous and violent, exemplifying how limited political patronage was dispersed among loyal party supporters. This dissertation examines the role of the political parties and how they mobilized grassroots supporters through inspirational speeches, partisan ideology, complex political patronage networks, and historic party platform issues from 1940 through 1980. The dissertation argues that the development of Jamaican trade unionism and its corresponding leadership created the political framework out of which Jamaica’s two major political parties, the Jamaica Labor Party (JLP) and People’s National Party (PNP) emerged. Within the evolution of their support base Jamaican politicians such as Alexander Bustamante utilized their influence over local constituencies to create a garrison form of mobilization that relied heavily upon violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Coke, Christoper Michael Plea
    United States Attorney Southern District of New York FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AUGUST 31, 2011 ELLEN DAVIS, CARLY SULLIVAN, JERIKA RICHARDSON PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE (212) 637-2600 JAMAICAN DRUG LORD CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL COKE PLEADS GUILTY IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL COKE, the leader of the Jamaica-based international criminal organization, "Shower Posse," also known as the "Presidential Click," pled guilty today to one count of racketeering conspiracy and one count of conspiracy to commit assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering. COKE was arrested by Jamaican authorities on June 22, 2010, near Kingston, Jamaica, and arrived in the Southern District of New York on June 24, 2010. COKE pled guilty before U.S. District Judge ROBERT P. PATTERSON. Manhattan U.S. Attorney PREET BHARARA stated: "For nearly two decades, Christopher Coke led a ruthless criminal enterprise that used fear, force and intimidation to support its drug and arms trafficking 'businesses.' He moved drugs and guns between Jamaica and the United States with impunity. Today's plea is a welcome conclusion to this ugly chapter of criminal history." According to the Superseding Information filed today in Manhattan federal court: Since the early 1990s, COKE led the Presidential Click, with members in Jamaica, the United States, and other countries, and controlled the Tivoli Gardens area, a neighborhood in inner- city Kingston, Jamaica. Tivoli Gardens was guarded by a group of gunmen who acted at COKE's direction. They were armed with illegally trafficked firearms from the United States, that COKE imported into Jamaica.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaica: a Long Road to Justice? 5 Human Rights Violations Under the State of Emergency
    Jamaica: a long ro ad to Ju stice? HuMAn RIgHts vIolAtIons undeR tHe stAte of eMeRgency amnesty international is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the universal declaration of Human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. first published in 2011 by amnesty international ltd Peter Benenson House 1 easton street london Wc1X 0dW united Kingdom © amnesty international 2011 index: amr 38/002/2011 english original language: english Printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, united Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. to request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover phot o: members of the Jamaica defence force stand guard following the may 2010 incursion by the security forces into tivoli gardens. © the gleaner company ltd amnesty.org CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................4 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................5 The May-July 2010 events..........................................................................................5 The official response..................................................................................................6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (“Wi Deal Wid It Wiself”): a Look at Life in the Jamaican Garrison by Marsha-Ann Tremaine Scott B.Sc., University of the West Indies, 2007
    We Deal With It Ourselves (“Wi Deal Wid it Wiself”): A Look at Life in the Jamaican Garrison by Marsha-Ann Tremaine Scott B.Sc., University of the West Indies, 2007 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Criminology Faculty of Arts & Social and Sciences © Marsha-Ann Tremaine Scott 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2014 Approval Name: Marsha-Ann T. Scott Degree: Master of Arts (Criminology) Title of Thesis: We Deal With It Ourselves (“Wi Deal Wid it Wiself”): A Look at Life in the Jamaican Garrison Examining Committee: Chair: Bill Glackman, Ph.D. Associate Professor Brian Burtch, Ph.D. Senior Supervisor Professor Sheri Fabian, Ph.D. Supervisor Senior Lecturer Marlyn Jones, Ph.D. External Examiner Professor Division of Criminal Justice California State University Date Defended/Approved: March 21, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Ethics Statement iv Abstract Created by the Jamaican political administration to garner support from the marginalized and socially excluded groupings in the inner city, the garrison has morphed into a counter society that subverts all forms of legitimate authority. Protected and led by dons who were originally appointed to carry out the dictates of the politicians, these men now possess full control of the garrison and have an unswerving allegiance from the members of these communities. The provision of opportunities for skills training, jobs, and education for members of these areas could possibly remove the state of dependency and ultimately the power that those possessing an abundance of wealth wield. The study includes semi-structured interviews with ten (10) participants from the community of August Town, Jamaica who provided insight into life in the garrison.
    [Show full text]
  • Shower Posse Author: Joshua T
    Organization Data Sheet – Shower Posse Author: Joshua T. Hoffman Review: Phil Williams A. When the organization was formed + brief history Under the leadership of Lester Lloyd Coke, the Shower Posse – named for its reputation of “raining” bullets on rival gangs – originated from the ghettos of Kingston, Jamaica in the late 1970s to early 1980s.1 At one point the FBI referred to the group as “the most violent and notorious criminal organization ever in America.”2 The posse was one of several posses utilized by Jamaica’s political system as tools to extort votes and provide intimidation.3 During the 1980s, the group expanded its activities to include the drug trade (ganga and crack cocaine), sending shipments of ganga to secret air strips throughout the Florida Keys.4 Still, the group was not feared in the United States until its involvement in the trafficking of cocaine. Using Jamaica as a transportation stop – moving the drugs from South America to the U.S. – the group’s operations stretched from Miami to New York (and included drug bases in more than 20 US cities, Canada, and the United Kingdom.5 B. Types of illegal activities engaged in, a. In general Drug trafficking, arms trafficking, and protection rackets b. Specific detail: types of illicit trafficking activities engaged in Drug trafficking: marijuana and cocaine C. Scope and Size a. Estimated size of network and membership Information not found. b. Countries / regions group is known to have operated in. (i.e. the group’s operating area) Many of the group’s members originated from Tivoli Gardens and other garrisons controlled by the JLP – such as the Southside.6 United States – several major cities (Miami, New York City, Seattle, etc.) Canada – greatest base of operation in Toronto (more than 20 years) UK – a splinter group known as the “President Click” operated in parts of Brixton7 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaica: Fear of Organised Criminal Gangs
    Country Policy and Information Note Jamaica: Fear of organised criminal gangs Version 2.0 March 2017 Preface This note provides country of origin information (COI) and policy guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling particular types of protection and human rights claims. This includes whether claims are likely to justify the granting of asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave and whether – in the event of a claim being refused – it is likely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under s94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the policy guidance contained with this note; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Country information The COI within this note has been compiled from a wide range of external information sources (usually) published in English. Consideration has been given to the relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability of the information and wherever possible attempts have been made to corroborate the information used across independent sources, to ensure accuracy. All sources cited have been referenced in footnotes. It has been researched and presented with reference to the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, dated July 2012. Feedback Our goal is to continuously improve our material. Therefore, if you would like to comment on this note, please email the Country Policy and Information Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Human Development Report 2012
    Caribbean Human Development Report 2012 Human Development and the Shift to Better Citizen Security Caribbean Human Development Report 2012 Human Development and the Shift to Better Citizen Security Copyright © 2012 by the United Nations Development Programme 1 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission. ISBN: 9789962688082 Website: http://www.regionalcentrelac-undp.org/en/hdr-caribbean Editors: Robert Zimmermann, Carol Lawes and Nanette Svenson Cover design: Timothy Bootan and Juan Manuel Salazar Design and Layout: Miguel Nova y Vínculos Gráficos Printed in Panama by Inversiones Gumo, S.A. For a list of any errors or omissions found subsequent to printing please visit our website. No consultation has been carried out in Guyana. The data on Guyana have been obtained through public sources and the UNDP Citizen Security Survey 2010. Caribbean Human Development Report 2012 Helen Clark Administrator United Nations Development Programme Rebeca Grynspan Associate Administrator United Nations Development Programme Heraldo Muñoz Niky Fabiancic Assistant Administrator and Director of the Deputy Director Regional Bureau for LAC Regional Bureau for LAC United Nations Development Programme United Nations Development Programme Freddy Justiniano Leida Mercado Director a.i. Human Development Advisor Regional Centre for LAC Coordinator Caribbean
    [Show full text]