DOCSLIB.ORG

Genera of Melanoplinae (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genera of Melanoplinae (Orthoptera: Acrididae) THE INTERNAI, MALE GENITALIA OF SELECTED GENERA OF MELANOPLINAE (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE). by Spyros D. Skareas Depa rtment of Na tural Resource Sciences McGill University, Montreal June 1998 A thesis subrnitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science 0 Spyros D. Skartas 1998 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Sewices senrices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington OmwaON KlA ON1 OnawaON K1AW Canada CaMda The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence ailowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seli reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT The internai male genitdia of selected genera of Melanoplinae (Onhoptera: Acndidae). M.Sc. Spyros D. Skareas Natural Resource Sciences The morphology of the intemal male genitaiia of selected genera of Melanoplinae (Onhoptera: Acrididae) was studied. A detailed cornparison of these structures was carried out, in an attempt to identiQ new characters that may be usehl in analyzing relationships between the members of the subfamily. Twenty two genera were examined, mostly of North American distribution, using one exernplar species for each of them. Standard dissection and drawing techniques were followed. The epiphallus and the apical parts of the aedeagus were found to be the most important taxonomie characters. The genera Apfenopedes and Buckeiîacris were highly divergent from the rest of the melanoplines, while the close relationship between Appalachia, Dendrotettix and Podisma was confirmed by genital characters. Internai male genitalic characters did not provide . significant support for many currendy recognized tribes and subtribes, suggesting that there is a great need for reclassification in the subfarnily. F~ÉSUME Les structures génitales mâles des genres sélectionnés de la sous-famille Mélanoplinae (Orthoptera: Acrididae) M.Sc. Spyros D.Skareas Sciences des Ressources Naturelles La morphologie des genitalia mle des genres sélectionnés de la sous-famille Mélanoplinae a été réalisée, afin de permettre d'identifier de nouveaux charactères qui pourraient être utiles dans l'analyse des liens entre les membres de cette sous-famille. Une espèce pour chacun des vingt-deux genres a été étudiée, majoritairement de provenance nord-américaine. Des techniques de dissection et de dessin coumantes ont été utilisées. II a été conclu que I'épiphaile et les parties apicales de l'édéage sont les charactères taxonomiques les plus importants. Les genres Aptenopedes et Brtckellacris étaient très divergents du reste des Mélanoplines. Le lien étroit entre Appalachia, Dendroteztix et Pudisma a été confirmé par l'examen des charactères génitaux. Les structures génitales mâles ne fournissent pas d'appui significatif pour plusieurs tribus et sous-tribus reconnues, indiquant qu'il est nécessaire de reclassifier la sous-famille. To Dr. Mazomenos & Dr Hsiung for introducing me to behavioral and systematic Entomology AKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 would like to thank the Lyman Entomological Museum, for providing me the space and environment to work for my research as well as most of the material for my study. Moreover 1 would like to extend my gratitude to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and iis cüllection manager Donald Azurna, for the loans of specimens and the excellent cooperation we had these 2 years. 1 am furthemore grateful to the Onhopterists' Society, for providing me with hnds for my research. McGill University also provided a considerable amount of money through a bursary and several fee waivers; therefore 1 would like to express rny appreciation to the Department of Natural Resource Sciences. Overall, 1 would Iike to thank my research supervisor Dr. CC.Hsiung, to whom 1 will dways be gratefbl. Without his help and support this work would have been impossible to be completed. 1 want to thank him not only because of his scientific directions, and his cooperation as a supervisor, but also for his psychologicd support and advises in several personal problems I faced. Additionally, 1 would like to thank Dr. Vickery for his contribution to my work. No matter day or hour Dr. Vickery was always willing to answer my numerous questions, to help me out and to direct me the right way. His guidance duririg my studies was extremely valuable, and 1 feel fortunate to have been able to work with one of the world's leading authorities in Orthoptera. Moreover, 1 should also thank Dr. Wheeler, for his encouragement at my first conference presentation in Edmonton, his endless comrnents and corrections to rny written texts, as well as his personal cornments and suggestions about my work, which they al1 helped me become a better systematist. Apm for the professors directly associated with my work, 1 would first like to thank Prof. Lockwood of University of Wyoring, for his personal support from the first moment of our communication. ieff was the perfect colleague, who would dedicate his time answering my melanopline-related questions and encourage me to work harder. Thanks also to Prof. Nick Papadopoulos of Carleton University and his wife Irinela for providing their endless support and valuable assistance whenever 1 needed. In addition, 1 ought to thank Patrice Bouchard, Stephanie Boucher, Scott Brooks, Paul Cermak, TilIy Gaoh, Corey Keeler, Cyrena Riley, and Rachel Wallage for being both great colleagues and friends. Thanks aiso to Prosanta Chakrabarty for his continuous encouragement. Special acknowledgments also extend to Marie-France Julien for her her assistance in the French abstract, as well as for the psychological suppon during the last stressful period before my thesis submission. Finally, 1 would like to express my deepest gratitude to my fady in Greece, for supponing me both financially and psychologically during al1 this time 1 was away fiom home. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page * - .USTRACT II RESUME DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGWS LIST OF TABLES INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 Systematics of the melanoplines 4 Phylogeny 5 The interna1 male genitalia as a systematic tooI in Acrididae and Melanoplinae MATERIALS AND METHODS Material examined Dissection and drawing Abbreviations and terminology. RESULTS Anatomy and fiinction of the copulatory structures Description of phailic structures for the genera studied DISCUSSION Range and distribution of phailic characters in the subfamily Melanoplinae Phylogenetic interpretations and suggestions for reclassification in the su b famil y Future research CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES ... Vlll LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Intemal male genitalia of Podisma pedesrris 67 2. Intemal male genitdia of A rgiacris rehni 69 3. Inted male genitalia of Asemopfus montanus 71 4 Intemal male genitaiia of Bradjnotes o. obesu 73 5. Internal male genitaiia of Buckeflacrisc. chifcofinae 75 6. Internal male genitaiia of Barytetfix h. hymphreysii 77 7. Internai male genitalin of Conalcaea miguelinata 79 8. Intemal male genitaiia of Dac~lotumbicolor picium 8 1 9. Intemal male genitalia of Hesperofettix virirüs praiensis 83 10. Internal male genitaiia of Dichropftis elongatus 85 11. Internai male genitalia of Aeoplides t. tumbulli 87 12. Int emal male genitalia of Aptenopedes sphenarioides 89 13. Internal male genitaiia of Hypochfora albû 9 1 14. Internai male genitaiia of Melanopius femzrrmbrz~m 93 15. Internal male genitaiia of Paroxya clavuliger 95 16. Internal male genitalia of Phoetaliotes nebrascer~sis 97 17. Internai male genitalia of Appafachia urcana 99 18. Internal male genitaiia of BohemanellaJ fi.isda 101 19. Internal male genitalia of Booneacris g. gfucialis 103 ix Figure Page 20 Intemal male genitalia of Dendroretrix queras 105 2 1 Internal male genitalia of Primnoa primnoa 1 O7 22 Internal male genitalia of Pmmnacris rainierensis 1O9 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Classification of the subfamily Melanoplinae, as proposed by Rehn and Randel1 ( 1 963). I Il 2. List of genera and exemplar species studied in the present work. 113 3. Tenninoiogy used by different authors for the interna1 male genitalia of Melanoplinae. 115 4. Comparative table of the intemal male genitalia of the melanopline genera studied. Real proportions are rnaintained for convenience in cornparison. 1 18 Since the begiming of this century, male genitalia have been widely used as a useful tool in systematics in most insect orders (Eberhard 1985). However in grasshoppers, it was not until the middle 1930's that systematists included the copulatory structures in their studies. Especially after Dirsh (1956) who proposed a new higher classification in Acridoidea based on the phallic cornplex, more and more orthopterists adopted the inclusion of such structures in taxonomie papers, and today this is considered a standard procedure for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited
    LITERATURE CITED Abercrombie, M., C. J. Hichman, and M. L. Johnson. 1962. A Dictionary of Biology. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Adkisson, C. S. 1996. Red Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra). In The Birds of North America, No. 256 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C. Agee, J. K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Covelo, CA. Albert, S. K., N. Luna, and A. L. Chopito. 1995. Deer, small mammal, and songbird use of thinned piñon–juniper plots: preliminary results. Pages 54–64 in Desired future conditions for piñon–juniper ecosystems (D. W. Shaw, E. F. Aldon, and C. LaSapio, eds.). Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR–RM–258. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Aldrich, J. W. 1946. New subspecies of birds from western North America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 59:129–136. Aldrich, J. W. 1963. Geographic orientation of American Tetraonidae. Journal of Wildlife Management 27:529–545. Allen, R. K. 1984. A new classification of the subfamily Ephemerellinae and the description of a new genus. Pan–Pacific Entomologist 60(3): 245–247. Allen, R. K., and G. F. Edmunds, Jr. 1976. A revision of the genus Ametropus in North America (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 49:625–635. Allen, R. P. 1958. A progress report on the wading bird survey. National Audubon Society, unpubl. rep., Tavernier, FL. American Ornithologists’ Union. 1931. Check–list of North American birds. 4th ed. American Ornithologists’ Union, Lancaster, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Status of the Genera Sorosporella and Syngliocladium Associated with Grasshoppers and Locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa
    Mycol. Res. 106 (6): 737–744 (June 2002). # The British Mycological Society 737 DOI: 10.1017\S0953756202006056 Printed in the United Kingdom. Taxonomic status of the genera Sorosporella and Syngliocladium associated with grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa Harry C. EVANS* and Paresh A. SHAH† CABI Bioscience UK Centre, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks. SL5 7TA, UK. E-mail: h.evans!cabi.org Received 2 September 2001; accepted 28 April 2002. The occurrence of disease outbreaks associated with the genus Sorosporella on grasshoppers and locusts (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) in Africa is reported. Infected hosts, representing ten genera within five acridoid subfamilies, are characterized by red, thick-walled chlamydospores which completely fill the cadaver. On selective media, the chlamydospores, up to seven-years-old, germinated to produce a Syngliocladium anamorph which is considered to be undescribed. The new species Syngliocladium acridiorum is described and two varieties are delimited: var. acridiorum, on various grasshopper and locust genera from the Sahelian region of West Africa; and, var. madagascariensis, on the Madagascan migratory locust. The ecology of these insect-fungal associations is discussed. Sorosporella is treated as a synonym of Syngliocladium. INTRODUCTION synanamorph, Syngliocladium Petch. Subsequently, Hodge, Humber & Wozniak (1998) described two Between 1990 and 1993, surveys for mycopathogens of Syngliocladium species from the USA and emended the orthopteran pests were conducted in Africa and Asia as generic diagnosis, which also included Sorosporella as a part of a multinational, collaborative project for the chlamydosporic synanamorph. biological control of grasshoppers and locusts of the Based on these recent developments, the taxonomic family Acridoidea or Acrididae (Kooyman & Shah status of the collections on African locusts and 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES in LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 10, No 4, 2021, 105 – 115 2277-663X (P) SEVEN PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED ORTHOPTERAN SPECIES IN LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Niccole D. Rech1*, Brianda Alirez2 and Lauren Paulk2 1Western New Mexico University, Deming, New Mexico 2Early College High School, Deming, New Mexico E-mail: [email protected] (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: The Chihuahua Desert is the largest hot desert (BWh) in North America. Orthopterans are an integral part of desert ecosystems. They include grasshoppers, katydids and crickets. A large section of the Northern Chihuahua Desert is in Luna County, New Mexico. There is a dearth of information on the Orthopterans in this area. Between May and October of 2020, sixty adult grasshoppers, two katydids and one camel cricket were captured from a 5-hectare (ha) area at base of the Florida Mountains, which is the extreme southern portion of Luna County. Luna County was in a severe drought during 2020. The insects were identified using several taxonomic keys (Cigliano, Braun, Eades & Otte, 2018; Guala & Doring, 2019; Triplehorn & Johnson, 2005; Richman, Lightfoot, Sutherland & Fergurson, 1993, Otte, 1984, 1981; Tinkham, 1944). A previous New Mexico State University (NMSU) survey from 1993 had only documented grasshoppers in the Acrididae and Romaleidae families. The objective of this continuing study is to identify and document all species of Orthopterans found in Luna County, and correlate the populations with changing weather patterns. In this portion of the study, the majority of Orthopterans captured were Leprus wheeleri (Thomas), a previously documented specie. However, seven undocumented species were also captured.
    [Show full text]
  • Locusts in Queensland
    LOCUSTS Locusts in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES – LAND PROTECTION by C.S. Walton L. Hardwick J. Hanson Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the many people who provided information for this assessment. Clyde McGaw, Kevin Strong and David Hunter, from the Australian Plague Locust Commission, are also thanked for the editorial review of drafts of the document. Cover design: Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7345 2453 6 QNRM03033 Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. February 2003 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Q 4000 #16401 02/03 Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 History ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Outbreaks across Australia ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Outbreaks in Queensland........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Current and predicted distribution ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan
    C 2000 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 65:351-358, 2000 C-Banded Karyotypes of Some Podisminae Grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae) from Japan Alexander G. Bugrov1,*, Elzbieta Warchalowska-Sliwa2, Gen lto3 and Sin-ichi Akimoto3 1 Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk and Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Krakow, Poland 3 Hokkaido University, Faculty of Agriculture, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan Accepted February 24, 2000 Summary C-banding patterns in Japanese grasshoppers belonging to the subfamily Podisminae: Podisma sapporensis Shiraki (2n •‰=23, NF=23), Parapodisma subastris Huang, Parapodisma ten- ryuensis Kobayashi, Parapodisma yamato Tominaga et Storozhenko, Parapodisma mikado (I. Boli- var), Fruhstorferiola okinawaensis (Shiraki) (2n d=21, NF =21), and Sinopodisma punctata Mist- shenko (2nd = 21, all chromosomes are two-armed) were studied. Cytogenetic similarities and differ- ences between particular species are discussed using the C-banding method. Key words Podisminae grasshoppers, Chromosome, Karyotype, C-banding. Karyotypes of 8 species of grasshopper belonging to the subfamily Podisminae have been de- scribed from Japan (Inoue 1985). However, the C-banding technique was not commonly used in the cytogenetic studies of Japanese Podisminae. Nevertheless, it has been used extensively with Or- thoptera to discriminate individual chromosomes and their behaviour during meiosis (Gosalvez et al. 1997). The application of this technique has produced new cytogenetic markers for comparative karyology of Podisminae (Westerman and Hewitt 1985, Bugrov et al. 1994, Bugrov 1995, Bugrov and Sergeev 1997). Moreover, the C-banding method gives information about the rates and features of chromosome evolution in groups of closely related species (Cabrero and Camacho 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • FROM AZAD JAMMU and KASHMIR ANSA TAMKEEN Reg. No. 2006
    BIOSYSTEMATICS OF GRASSHOPPERS (ACRIDOIDEA: ORTHOPTERA) FROM AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR ANSA TAMKEEN Reg. No. 2006. URTB.9184 Session 2006-2009 DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, RAWALAKOT UNIVERSITY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR BIOSYSTEMATICS OF GRASSHOPPERS (ACRIDOIDEA: ORTHOPTERA) FROM AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR By ANSA TAMKEEN (Reg. No. 2006. URTB.9184) M.Sc. (Hons.) Agri. Entomology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of philosophy In ENTOMOLOGY Department of Entomology Session 2006-2010 FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, RAWALAKOT THE UNIVERSITY OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR DECLARATION I declare publically that, this thesis is entirely my own work and has not been presented in any way for any degree to any other university. October, 2015 Signature ______________________________ Ansa Tamkeen To Allah Hazarat Muhammad (PBUH) & My Ever loving Abu & Ammi CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xvii ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTON………………...……………………………………………1 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE…………………………………….………..…6 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS…………...…...………………...................14 4. RESULTS.……..………..………..….…………….………………….……...21 SUPERFAMILY ACRIDOIDAE FAMILY DERICORYTHIDAE ..................................................24 SUBFAMILY CONOPHYMINAE………………………….…24 FAMILY PYRGOMORPHIDAE…………………...…..….……26 FAMILY ACRIDIDAE……………………………………...……37 SUBFAMILY MELANOPLINAE………………………….….46 SUBFAMILY HEMIACRIDINAE……………………….……47 SUBFAMILY OXYINAE ……………………………………..62 SUBFAMILY TROPIDOPOLINAE ……………………...…...75 SUBFAMILY CYRTACANTHACRIDINAE……………..…..76
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Fusion Polymorphisms in the Grasshopper, Dichroplus Fuscus (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Melanoplinae): Insights on Meiotic Effects
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 11–19, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.010 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Chromosome fusion polymorphisms in the grasshopper, Dichroplus fuscus (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Melanoplinae): Insights on meiotic effects ALBERTO TAFFAREL1, 2, 3, CLAUDIO J. BIDAU 4 and DARDO A. MARTÍ 1, 2 1 Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (IBS), Félix de Azara 1552, Piso 6°, 3300 Posadas, Misiones, Argentina; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917 (C1033AAJ), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3 Comité Ejecutivo de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (CEDIT), Félix de Azara 1890, Piso 5º, 3300 Posadas, Misiones, Argentina 4 Paraná y Los Claveles, 3300 Posadas, Misiones, Argentina; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Orthoptera, Acrididae, Dichroplus fuscus, Robertsonian fusion, grasshoppers, chiasmata, trivalents, chromosomal cline Abstract. Robertsonian fusions account for many of the changes in the evolution of the orthopteran karyotype; in their origin, a centric fusion is involved between two acro-telocentric chromosomes, forming a single bi-armed chromosome. It is usual for these rearrange- ments to be associated with profound changes in meiosis, such as modification in frequency and distribution of chiasmata.Dichroplus fuscus is a South American grasshopper with a wide distribution. In this work we analyzed nine populations from Misiones Province, north-eastern Argentina. This species presents a standard karyotype of 2n = 23/24 (♂/♀) with all chromosomes acro-telocentric and an X0/XX chromosomal sex determining mechanism. This standard karyotype has been modified by the occurrence of two Robertso- nian fusions involving chromosomes 1/3 and 2/4; values of fusions per individual (fpi) show a significant increase in the presence of karyotypic polymorphisms towards southern populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 14 Number 3 – Number 4 Article 1 12-30-1954 The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera Andrew H. Barnum Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnum, Andrew H. (1954) "The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 14 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol14/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. IMUS.COMP.ZSOL iU6 1 195^ The Great Basin Naturalist harvard Published by the HWIilIijM i Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Volum e XIV DECEMBER 30, 1954 Nos. 3 & 4 THE TAXONOMY OF UTAH ORTHOPTERA^ ANDREW H. BARNUM- Grand Junction, Colorado INTRODUCTION During the years of 1950 to 1952 a study of the taxonomy and distribution of the Utah Orthoptera was made at the Brigham Young University by the author under the direction of Dr. Vasco M. Tan- ner. This resulted in a listing of the species found in the State. Taxonomic keys were made and compiled covering these species. Distributional notes where available were made with the brief des- criptions of the species. The work was based on the material in the entomological col- lection of the Brigham Young University, with additional records obtained from the collection of the Utah State Agricultural College.
    [Show full text]