Rural Areas in Lithuania: Significance, Development and Aid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Rural areas in Lithuania: significance, development and aid Dr. Angele Kedaitiene Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Department of European Union affairs and international relations Division of coordination of implementation of common agriculture policy, and Lithuanian Agricultural University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Business Management Email: [email protected], [email protected] Rasa Martinavičiene Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Department of rural development Division of rural development and coordination of structural support Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the 99th seminar of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), The future of rural Europe in global agri-food system, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 24-27, 2005 Copyright 2005 by Angele Kedaitiene and Rasa Martinaviciene. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies 1 Abstract. Paper aims analysing the situation of rural areas of Lithuania as well as support got from the budget of European Union facilitating the development of rural areas. Paper comprises three chapters. The rural areas are of substantial importance in terms of both surface area and population. At the beginning of 2002, the rural areas covered 63.6 thousand sq. km. This equalled 97.4 % of the total Lithuanian surface area. In 2003, the rural population was estimated at 1,145 million inhabitants. At the end of 2001 the total rural working population made up to 30 per cent of total Lithuanian employment, while agriculture, forestry and fishery employment rate was estimated at 17,8 per cent. Since Lithuania has joined the European Union in May 2004, population of rural areas starting to receive significant financial aid from the European budget. Largest share of EU financiers is going to be redistributed as the direct payments constituting in 2004 55 per cent of EU level. Programmes and finances, targeted directly to support the rural development, are considered in the so-called programming documents, prepared by the Government and approved by the European Commission. Key words: rural areas, rural development, EU financial aid, Lithuania Jel 18 1. Context: rural areas in Lithuania Lithuania is located in the eastern part of Europe, bordering Latvia in the north (610 km long border), Belarus to the east and south (724 km) and Poland to the south (110 km), as well as Kaliningrad region of Russia (303 km) to the southwest. The total surface area of Lithuania is 65.3 thousand sq. km (roughly the size of Ireland). Lithuanian population is 3,462 million of which 2,317 million live in urban areas and about 1,145 million in rural areas. Map 1. Lithuania’s geographic position The country forms part of the great North European Plain, and landscape alternates between hilly areas and flat plains. There are two elevated regions with a maximum of 290 m above sea level, and three plains and 2 lowlands. Lithuania has 758 rivers longer than 10 km, and there are 2834 lakes larger than 0.5 ha. Forests cover 31 per cent of the territory. The rural areas are of substantial importance in terms of both surface area and population. At the beginning of 2002, the rural areas covered 63.6 thousand sq. km. This equalled 97.4 % of the total Lithuanian surface area. Table 1. Rural areas in Lithuania - population and area, February 2002 Area Per- Population Population ('000) Per-centage (sq. km'000) centage Density in sq. km Total Lithuania 65.3 100.0 3.475 100.0 53.3 Rural Areas 63.6 97.4 1.143 32.9 18.0 Source: Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development Plan (2004 – 2006), 2004 30,8 per cent of the total Lithuanian population lives in approximately 22,000 rural settlements of various sizes. Most of them are small villages with a population of less than 50 inhabitants. The density of population is 18,0 inhabitants per km2. Table 2 . Rural settlements, 2000 Number of inhabitants Number of rural settlements Percentage of rural settlements Up to 26 14767 68.5 26-50 2635 12.2 51-200 2732 12.7 201-1000 1300 6.1 >1000 115 0.5 Source: Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development Plan (2004 – 2006), 2004 Small rural settlements prevail in Lithuania; most of them are farmstead villages (about 80 percent of the total rural settlements). Large settlements and small towns comprise 20 per cent of the total number of settlements. The newest Population census data states that in 2003, Lithuania’s population was estimated at 3,462,553 inhabitants – about 49 thousand less than in the beginning of 2000. In 2003, the rural population was estimated at 1,145 million inhabitants, i. e. accounted for 33,06 per cent of the total Lithuanian population. From 1995 the total population was constantly decreasing. However, in the rural population very slight fluctuation can be observed and on average the rural population in the period 1995-2002 was 32.7 percent. Table 3. Changes in rural population Beginning of the Total population Rural population % of rural population year (‘000) (‘000) 1995 3 643 1 183 32.4 1996 3 615 1 183 32.7 1997 3 588 1 159 32.3 1998 3 562 1 163 32.6 1999 3 536 1 159 32.8 2000 3 512 1 155 32.9 2001 3 478 1 153 33.2 3 2002 3 475 1 149 33 06 2003 3 463 1 145 33.06 Source: : Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development Plan (2004 – 2006), 2004 The tendency of ageing population is common to the whole European region, however is it more evident in rural areas than in the towns. According to the data of February 2002 the share of population between 15 and 64 years was lower in rural areas (61.5 %) compared to urban areas (69.4%). At the same time the share of population over 64 years was significantly higher in rural areas (17.9%) compared to urban areas (12.4%). Demographic structure of rural population has a negative impact on further implementation of integrated rural development actions. Table 4. Age structure of population, February 2002 Total population Population under 15 Population between Population above 64 years 15-64 years years Thous. % Thous. % Thous. % Thous. % Total Lithuania 3475,6 100 659,6 19,0 2321,1 66,8 494,9 14,2 Urban areas 2326,2 66,9 422,5 18,2 1614,2 69,4 289,5 12,4 Rural areas 1149,4 33,1 237,1 20,6 706,9 61,5 205,4 17,9 Source: Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development Plan (2004 – 2006), 2004 The proportion of the urban-rural population among counties is quite even - there are 3 counties with an above average urban population, as well as 3 counties with an above rural population and 4 counties with about average. The even distribution of population is considered by the Government to be an important strength of Lithuania. It provides a sound basis for sustainability of municipalities and rural communities. During the process of transition Lithuania's labour market has undergone significant changes. The labour force experienced a dramatic loss of income and, in turn, purchasing power during the early transition, although a partial recovery of income became apparent in 1994 with economic recovery. The development of economic reforms produced a downward trend in employment. Lithuania's employment data for 2001 compared to 1997 indicate an accumulated job loss of around 7% (106 900). During the same period the number of employed population decreased from 85,9% to 83%. At the end of 2001, the total rural working population made up to 30 per cent of total Lithuanian employment, while agriculture, forestry and fishery employment rate was estimated at 17.8 per cent. In spite of the fact, that in 1995 the share of the sector employment made up 22.8 % of total employment, it must be considered, that the share of employment is continuously decreasing. Table 5. Employment in agriculture, hunting and forestry and fishing, 1990-2001, % Economic activity 1990 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Agriculture, hunting and forestry and fishing 19.5 22.8 24.2 21.8 21.5 20.2 19.9 17.8 Agriculture, hunting and forestry 19.4 22.7 24.1 21.7 21.4 20.1 19.8 17.7 Agriculture 18.5 22.9 23.1 20.8 20.6 19.2 18.9 16.7 Fishing 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Source: Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development Plan (2004 – 2006), 2004 Rather large number of people engaged in agriculture is determined by the low efficiency of labour, partial employment and small farms. Lithuanian agriculture has large possibilities to increase labour efficiency by 4 consolidating and specializing farms. Therefore the number of the directly employed in agriculture would go down and thus will contribute to the growth of unemployment in rural areas. Redundant people should have possibilities and suitable conditions to develop new traditions in agricultural production and to engage in new business activities. In the last years, the changes in the labour force in rural areas have not been very great, but there are certain adverse tendencies that give reasons for concern: the number of the employed decreases while unemployment is growing. In 2001, employment rate in rural areas was 43 percent and it is by 7% lower then in urban areas. The rate fluctuates in the country from 34,5 to 51,7 % broadly reflecting the actual economic and social development within different parts of Lithuania.
Recommended publications
  • SOCIAL EDUCATION Current Problems and Perspectives

    SOCIAL EDUCATION Current Problems and Perspectives

    SOCIAL EDUCATION Current problems and perspectives SOCIAL EDUCATION Current problems and perspectives EDITOR – IN – CHIEF Leta Dromantienė Mariusz Jędrzejko EDITORIAL BOARD Małgorzata Przybysz-Zaremba, Valdonė Indrašienė, Linda Daniela, Rita Nordström-Lytz Vilnius 2014 UDK 37.035 So-15 EDITOR – IN – CHIEF Prof. Dr. Mariusz Jędrzejko, (1) Center of Social Prevention, Poland; (2) University of Social Scienses, Poland Prof. Dr. Leta Dromantienė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania EDITORIAL BOARD: Prof. Dr. Małgorzata Przybysz Zaremba, Academy of Business Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland Prof. Dr. Valdonė Indrašienė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania Assoc. Prof. Dr. Linda Daniela, University of Latvija, Latvia Dr. Rita Nordström-Lytz, Åbo Akademi University, Finland EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Agata Katkonienė, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania MA Ewa Karolczak-Wawrzała, Poland REVIEWERS Prof. Dr. Irena Žemaitaitytė Assoc. Prof. Dr. Živilė Vilma Jonynienė THE PROJECT COVERS by Zbigniew Pindor – Center of Social Prevention (www.cps.edu.pl) ISBN 978-9955-19-656-3 (online) ISBN 978-9955-19-658-7 (print) Mykolas Romeris University, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction . 9 Parts I Perspectives and Dilemmas of Socio-Educational Activities Mariusz Jędrzejko, Marzena Netczuk-Gwoździewicz Young People at Risk Civilization – Socio-Educational and Psy- chological Perspective (Part I) . 17 Mariusz Jędrzejko, Marzena Netczuk-Gwoździewicz Young People at Risk Civilization – New Challenges (Part II) . 33 Algimantas Šimaitis, Sandra Valantiejienė The Profession of Social Pedagogue in Lithuania: Changes and Perspectives . 45 Gintautė Žibėnienė, Rita Virbalienė Study Quality Concept of Students of Social Pedagogy . 55 Odeta Merfeldaite, Jolanta Pivoriene, Valdonė Indrašienė Professional Self-development of Social Pedagogues: Lithuanian Case. 63 Romas Prakapas, Leta Dromantienė, Dalia Prakapienė Monitoring as a Part of Management Process .
  • Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP) (2013)

    Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP) (2013)

    Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP) Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference No. 6 ISSN 2255-808X Devoted to 150 Anniversary of Latvia University of Agriculture 2013 Jelgava Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP) Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference No. 6 ISSN 2255-808X Devoted to 150 Anniversary of Latvia University of Agriculture Jelgava 2013 Rural Environment. Education.Personality (REEP) (2013). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume 6. (CD-ROM) March 20th-21st, 2013, LLU, Jelgava, Latvia, pp. 361. Participating education establishments: Ankara University, Turkey Autonomous Agrarian University Antonio Narro, México Autonomous University of Morelos, México Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic Daugavpils University, Latvia Distance Education Study Centre, Riga Technical University, Latvia Jan Długosz University, Poland Latvia University of Agriculture, Latvia Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Lithuania Manager and Guidance Counsellor In Career Guidance Centre for Youth and Parents, Latvia NGO „Visikuma muizas fonds”, Latvia Riga Stradins University, Latvia Riga International School of Economics and Business Administration, Latvia Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy, Latvia Riga Technical University, Latvia Tallinn University, Estonia University of Helsinki, Finland University of Kaiserslautern, Germany University of Latvia, Latvia University of Malta, Malta Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania Editor
  • Lithuanian Regional Fdi During the Litas Period, 1997-2013

    Lithuanian Regional Fdi During the Litas Period, 1997-2013

    Journal of International Business Research Volume 17, Issue 1, 2018 LITHUANIAN REGIONAL FDI DURING THE LITAS PERIOD, 1997-2013 Gregory J Brock, Georgia Southern University ABSTRACT FDI in to the ten counties of Lithuania 1997-2013 is substantial and widely dispersed. Applying a standard model of FDI impact on regional economic growth reveals dispersion of FDI as well as the amount has contributed to stronger regional growth. Results are not sensitive to the uniqueness of greater Vilnius though the county with the national capital continues to attract the most FDI and has suffered least from the demographic crisis. Greater attention to human capital development outside of greater Vilnius is recommended to continue to attract FDI to rural areas of the country with a focus on new goods exports to enhance labour productivity. Keywords: Lithuania, Local FDI, Regional Analysis. JEL: F3, P2, P25 INTRODUCTION The inflow of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in to a small transition economy experiencing high emigration is understudied with Lithuania having the most challenging demographic crisis of any country in Europe (IMF, 2015). Once FDI arrives in a transition country it is often concentrated in a few urban areas leading to large inequalities across and within regions. Lithuania is no exception with the three counties with the three major cities having much better labour markets than other counties especially rural areas (OECD, 2018). While regional FDI is examined in the literature, how much FDI flows to urban centres versus rural areas is often ignored. Here we examine rural and urban FDI inside Lithuanian’s counties as the economy recovers from the 1998 financial crisis and through the Great Recession some 10 years later using a standard approach to FDI inflows applied to other countries but never Lithuania.
  • Lithuanian Public Libraries: Preserving, Creating, Cooperating

    Lithuanian Public Libraries: Preserving, Creating, Cooperating

    COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION LITHUANIAN LIBRARIANS‘ ASSOCIATION LITHUANIAN PUBLIC LIBRARIES: PRESERVING, CREATING, COOPERATING LITHUANIAN PUBLIC LIBRARIES: PRESERVING, CREATING, COOPERATING 1 LITHUANIAN PUBLIC LIBRARIES: PRESERVING, CREATING, COOPERATING Editor: County Public Libraries Association In cooperation with: Lithuanian Librarians’ Association Compiled by Gerda Putnaitė /VCPL/ Edita Urbonavičienė /KCPL/ Daiva Stasaitienė /KlCPL/ Ekaterina Prakapene /ŠCPL/ Sponsors: Virginija Švedienė /PCPL/ Edited by: Laima Pačebutienė /KlAVB/, [email protected] Translated by Loreta Dapkienė Designer: Jūratė Bizauskienė Photos from libraries archives Publication is available as free pdf file at www.klavb.lt © County Public Libraries Association, 2012 © Lithuanian Librarians’ Association, 2012 2 CONTENTS PREFACE KLAIPĖDA REGION INNOVATIVE LIBRARY – A PART OF SUSTAINABLE NETWORK KLAIPĖDA COUNTY I. SIMONAITYTĖ PUBLIC LIBRARY / KlCP THE MAP OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF LITHUANIA MUNICIPAL PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF KLAIPĖDA REGION Preserving LIBRARIES IN LITHUANIA Creating MARTYNAS MAŽVYDAS NATIONAL LIBRARY OF LITHUANIA /LNB Cooperating CHANGES IN PUBLIC LIBRARIES DURING THE PROJECT LIBRARIES FOR INNOVATION (2008 – 2012) ŠIAULIAI REGION ŠIAULIAI CAUNTY POVILAS VIŠINSKIS PUBLIC LIBRARY/ŠCPL LITHUANIAN LIBRARIES IN NETWORKS: PRESERVING, CREATING, COOPERATING MUNICIPAL PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF ŠIAULIAI REGION Preserving VILNIUS REGION Creating VILNIUS COUNTY ADOMAS MICKEVIČIUS PUBLIC LIBRARY / VCPL Cooperating MUNICIPAL PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF VILNIUS
  • The Regional Policy Strategy

    The Regional Policy Strategy

    Lithuanian Regional Policy WHITE PAPER for harmonious and sustainable development 2017–2030 Approved at the 15 December 2017 meeting of the National Regional Development Council 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 CONCEPTS ................................................................................................................................... 8 REGIONAL POLICY STATUS QUO ........................................................................................ 9 Legal regulation and system ........................................................................................................ 9 Challenges .................................................................................................................................. 10 Geographically balanced, harmonious and sustainable economic growth ............................. 10 Quality living conditions throughout Lithuania ..................................................................... 12 THE REGIONAL POLICY STRATEGY ................................................................................ 15 REGIONAL POLICY REVIEW INDICATORS (EXPECTED OUTCOMES) ................... 28 ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM – ONLY IF THE OBJECTIVES ARE NOT ACHIEVED ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................................
  • UNIVERSITY of TURKU Faculty of Humanities Baltic Sea Region Studies

    UNIVERSITY of TURKU Faculty of Humanities Baltic Sea Region Studies

    UNIVERSITY OF TURKU Faculty of Humanities Baltic Sea Region Studies Master’s Thesis BECOMING LOCALS IN A BORDERLAND OF EXILES. SENSE OF PLACE IN THE STORIES OF LITHUANIA MINOR DWELLERS. Camilla Marucco Turku August 2014 The originality of this thesis has been checked in accordance with the University of Turku quality assurance system using the Turnitin Originality Check service. THE UNIVERSITY OF TURKU Baltic Sea Region Studies Faculty of Humanities MARUCCO, CAMILLA: Becoming Locals in a Borderland of Exiles. Sense of Place in the Stories of Lithuania Minor Dwellers. Master’s thesis, 119 p., 1 appendix page Baltic Sea Region Studies August 2014 This thesis deals with sense of place, the relation that we construct with our dwelling and the surrounding environment. The topic belongs to the field of human geography. Sense of place is deeply intertwined with the ideas of feeling at home and having a place where to return. I argue that narratives of life experience help us relate to the places we inhabit, go through, leave. My analysis concerns Lithuania Minor, the Lithuanian region lying by the border with Kaliningrad, and focuses in particular on Vilkyškiai, a village in the municipality of Pagėgiai. Most of the area’s original population disappeared in the war. After 1945, people from all over the country and the USSR settled here. This raised the prickly question of who belongs to the borderland. Refugees, migrants and settlers allow us to observe closely the development of sense of place and its main constituents. Through this analysis, I challenge the idea of people’s natural rights to places and shows how time, engagement in local-based cultural activities and recollection help foreigners become locals.
  • 005 Third Report Submitted by Lithuania

    005 Third Report Submitted by Lithuania

    Strasbourg, 21 September 2011 ACFC/SR/III(2011)005 THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY LITHUANIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 21 September 2011 1 THE THIRD REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA SUBJECT TO ARTICLE 25 (2) OF THE CONVENTION 2011 2 Table of Contents: I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………...…..3 II. Report by Individual Article .........................................................................................6 Article 1-2 ..........................................................................................................................6 Article 3............................................................................................................................. 9 Article 4............................................................................................................................16 Article 5............................................................................................................................33 Article 6............................................................................................................................41 Article 7............................................................................................................................50 Article 8............................................................................................................................51
  • Lithuania Country Report: Social Impact Of

    Lithuania Country Report: Social Impact Of

    On behalf of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe Final Country Report Lithuania April 2012 Authors: Dovilė Krupickaitė Arūnas Poviliūnas Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this publication. Social Impact of Emigration and Rural-Urban Migration in Central and Eastern Europe VT/2010/001 Content 1. Socio-Economic and Political Overview ............................................................................. 3 2. Main emigration and internal migration trends and patterns............................................... 5 2.1. Main emigration trends................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Main internal migration trends ..................................................................................... 8 2.3. Main characteristics of migrants .................................................................................. 9 3. Nation-wide labour market and social development trends under the influence of emigration ............................................................................................................................10 3.1. Economic and labour market developments ...............................................................10 3.2. Social security ............................................................................................................14
  • Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Lithuania

    Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector in Lithuania

    ETHNIC STRUCTURE, INEQUALITY AND GOVERNANCE OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN LITHUANIA NATALIJA KASATKINA & VIDA BERESNEVICIUTE JANUARY 2004 Part of UNRISD Project on Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector. All unauthorized citation, duplication or distribution prohibited without the approval of UNRISD and the authors. C O N T E N T 1. Introduction: Argument, Conceptual Framework and Methodology 3 2. Ethnic Cleavages 7 2.1. Trends in Ethnic Composition 7 2.2. Migration Trends in Soviet Period 11 2.3. Migration Trends after the Restoration of Independence 13 2.4. Ethnic Cleavages in Regions and Towns 16 2.5. Socio-Economic, Social and Cultural Cleavages: Ethnic Relations, Trends in 18 Education and Employment 2.5.1 Social Relations: Social Adaptation of Ethnic Groups 18 2.5.2 Educational Attainment 22 2.5.3 Trends in Employment 25 3. Impact of the Soviet Period on Ethnic Structure 30 4. Ethnic Cleavages and Inequalities in the Public Sector 33 4.1 Legal Framework for Protecting Minority Rights 33 4.2 Electoral Rules 36 4.3 Political Parties and Organisations of Ethnic Minorities 37 4.4 Ethnic Structure of the Parliament (Seimas) 38 4.5 Ethnic Structure in Governmental Bodies (Cabinet) 46 4.6 Civil Service at Municipal Level 50 5. Institutional and Policy Reforms for Managing Diversity and Inequalities 56 5.1 The Department of National Minorities and Lithuanians Living Abroad 56 5.2 The Conception of Ethnic Policy 58 5.3 Recommendatory Considerations 59 5.3.1 Educational Issues 59 5.3.2 Political and Civic Participation of Ethnic Minority Groups 60 6.
  • Consolidated Annual Report And

    Consolidated Annual Report And

    CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY 2018 THE EUROPEAN UNION, PRESENTED TOGETHER WITH THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 1 CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 3 WORD OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 9 WORD OF THE CEO 10 GENERAL INFORMATION 11 COMPANY MANAGEMENT 13 DIVIDEND POLICY 20 MAJOR EVENTS OF THE ACCOUNTING PERIOD 21 MAJOR EVENTS THAT OCCURRED AFTER THE END OF THE 22 ACCOUNTING PERIOD KEY PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL INDICATORS 23 ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 30 ACTIVITY OVERVIEW 37 PLANS AND FORECASTS 41 STRATEGY GOALS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION 43 MAIN OPERATIONAL RISKS 48 CORRUPTION PREVENTION 50 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 52 INFORMATION ON SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS 57 COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRANSPARENCY GUIDELINES 58 AUDITORS 59 CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 60 2 WORD OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Dear friends, 2018 was of great importance to the group of Lietuvos paštas companies. This year was marked by targeted changes resulting from a sustainable foundation for further action and a clear identification of business lines. One of the most important cause that has provided a clear, solid foundation for the company's effective management is the formation of a new team of managers. I believe that the new managers, having extensive and broad experience in the largest companies in the country, will be able to firmly hold the steering wheel of the Lietuvos paštas company group in a troubled, shifted sea that has to be passed through. Particular importance for the company's activities was given to the new strategy of the Lietuvos paštas company group adopted in 2018.
  • The Problem of Klaipėda Region Peripherality

    The Problem of Klaipėda Region Peripherality

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Klaipeda University Open Journal Systems ISSN 2029-9370. REGIONAL FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, No. 1 (6) THE PROBLEM OF KLAIPĖDA REGION PERIPHERALITY Gintarė Pociūtė1 Institute of geology and geography (Lithuania) ABSTRACT This article presents the socioeconomic and demographic situation in Klaipėda county that is illustrated by chosen indicators’ analy- sis. In this article Klaipėda county has been chosen as an example territory to measure the peripherality phenomenon. Thus, in order to measure the peripherality the chosen indicators’ values were compared with Lithuanian average and state’s centres’ values. The article stresses the most peripheral regions in Klaipėda county which needs the governance attention and also the strongest one that leads all the county. The article finds out that the cooperation question is essential for both – county’s peripheries and centres – as it provides possibility to stay stable or even endows a potential to grow. KEY WORDS: Klaipėda county, core-periphery, peripheral region, cooperation. JEL CODES: R100 Introduction The peripherality question is one of the most essential ones’ while discussing about the region’s possi- bility to compete and at the same time cooperate with other regions. In the cooperation sphere the priority is usually given to the stronger and more centrality features worth regions as these regions have enough of social, economical, demographical stock. In this case appears the question: which regions might me noticed as central ones and which ones should be underlined as peripheral? Thus, this article takes a task to clarify this question while taking Klaipėda region as an example for measuring peripherality of this specific region.
  • The Change of Forests and Their Area in Lithuania

    The Change of Forests and Their Area in Lithuania

    RURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DOI: 10.22616/rrd.24.2018.027 THE CHANGE OF FORESTS AND THEIR AREA IN LITHUANIA Giedrė Ivavičiūtė Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuania Kaunas Forestry and Environmental Engineering University of Applied Sciences, Lithuania Klaipėda State University of Applied Sciences, Lithuania [email protected] Abstract The article presents an analysis of the existing situation of forests of the Republic of Lithuania. The situation is analysed in ten counties of the country. In the Republic of Lithuania, forests occupied 2,178,958.04 ha, country’s forest coverage – 33.38% in 2017. The highest forest coverage was established in Alytus (48.80%) and Vilnius (43.47%) counties. Only in three counties of Lithuania (Panevėžys, Telšiai and Utena) the prevailing type of ownership is private forests. In all counties of Lithuania mostly there are Group IV commercial forests, which make up 71.4% of the total forest area. The least are Group I reserved forests. Coniferous species (56.2%) prevail in the country’s forests, of which pine forests are dominant. It is crucial today to analyse the current state of forests and anticipate changes in trends, preventing potential threats. Following the analysis of Lithuanian forest change, it was determined that during the period between the years 2006 and 2017, the forest area increased by 78,616.40 ha or 3.74%. The largest forest development took place in Utena (17,324.13 ha or 7.32%) and Šiauliai (14,798.15 ha or 6.87%) counties. In order to implement the forestry development prospects, from 2018 to 2030, 106,068.87 ha of forests should be planted.