DOCSLIB.ORG

Katherine Mansfield and Edwin Muir in the New Age

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Katherine Mansfield and Edwin Muir in the New Age Chapter 5 We Moderns: Katherine Mansfield and Edwin Muir in the New Age Chris Mourant In 1911, Holbrook Jackson privately printed a book of aphorisms titled Plati- tudes in the Making, which he circulated amongst his close friends. In the copy given to G.K. Chesterton are a series of jottings made in green ink under each of Jackson’s aphorisms, a response either endorsing or emphatically rejecting each maxim with an alternative. Under ‘He who reasons is lost’, for instance, Chesterton wrote: ‘He who never reasons is not worth finding’ (Jackson and Chesterton 19). Beneath ‘Don’t think – do’, he declared: ‘Do think! Do!’ (19). In this text, the Christian apologist challenges the enthusiast of Nietzsche’s Dio- nysian philosophy. For these writers, aphorisms not only enabled the display of individual linguistic wit, but also provided a common ground for debate: the form is inherently dialogic, inviting either identification, or the articulation of a radically alternate point of view. And it is not coincidental that both Jackson and Chesterton were regular contributors to the New Age at this time, a peri- odical that invited such dialogic exchanges and positioned the aphorism as a form synonymous with modernity. Together with Alfred Richard Orage, Jackson became co-editor of the New Age in 1907. This magazine became hugely important in disseminating and pro- moting aphoristic writing in the early twentieth century. Young writers were encouraged to develop their craft by composing aphorisms for publication in the periodical; as such, the aphorism form became associated in the New Age with a new generation of modernist writers and their developing ideas of the ‘modern’. Launched in 1894 as a Christian Socialist weekly, Orage and Jackson bought the New Age with the financial backing of George Bernard Shaw and a Theosophist banker, Lewis Alexander Wallace, with the aim of turning it into a journal that would present modern, socialist perspectives on contemporary politics, literature, and art. While Jackson was co-editor of the New Age for only the first volume of the ‘New Series’, Orage continued to edit the periodical until 1924, making it one of the most important publication venues for the develop- ment and dissemination of modernist literature and culture. Katherine Mansfield’s first published stories in England appeared in the New Age between 1910 and 1911. In 1921, she sent a letter to Orage recognising © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004400061_007 <UN> Katherine Mansfield and Edwin Muir in the New Age 95 his influence, calling him ‘my master’ and stating: ‘you taught me to write, you taught me to think; you showed me what there was to be done and what not to do’ (Collected Letters 4:177). When Orage founded the New English Weekly in 1932, he received hundreds of letters expressing a similar sentiment to Mans- field, crediting him with helping to foster literary talent in the old days of the New Age. Ashley Dukes, for instance, wrote: ‘They were grand years from 1907 to 1914, when so many of us were doing our apprenticeship under your shrewd direction’. About the New Age, E.H. Visiak recalled: ‘How well one remembers the enthusiasm of the new writers it attracted! How many a name, now famous, it brought to light!’ And, about the periodical, S.G. Hobson concluded: ‘It is uni- versally recognised that it was the most stimulating and formative influence of that period’.1 After Orage’s death in 1934, the New English Weekly published a memorial issue of tributes to its late editor from a range of writers and artists, including Shaw, Chesterton, Ezra Pound, Augustus John, H.G. Wells, Richard Aldington, Herbert Read, John Middleton Murry, Eric Gill, Storm Jameson, and Edwin Muir. In his contribution to this memorial issue, T.S. Eliot notes that Orage’s death ‘is a public loss’, while arguing that he would be remembered ‘as the best literary critic of that time in London’, and ‘the benevolent editor who encouraged merit and (what is still rarer) tolerated genius’ (‘Orage: Memories’ 100). The New Age functioned as the print equivalent of the community of writers and thinkers that Orage and Jackson had first brought together with the estab- lishment of the Leeds Arts Club in 1903. Inviting the leading literary figures of the day to speak, such as Chesterton, Shaw, Wells, W.B. Yeats, Edward Carpen- ter, and Wyndham Lewis, among many others, the Leeds Arts Club reflected the commitment of Orage and Jackson to bringing the latest political and aes- thetic ideas out of the metropolitan centre of London to the provinces. Like- wise, the New Age helped to foster the literary talents of young writers from peripheral spaces, such as Edwin Muir, originally from the Orkney Islands, and Mansfield, originally from New Zealand. Like the Leeds Arts Club, the New Age sought to encourage debate and dialogue between writers. Ann Ardis has analysed how the periodical stoked competing visions of modernity and modernism by publishing ‘writers side by side with articles challenging their work’, including ‘visual and verbal parodies of modernist texts, artists, and manifestos; columns by the editor and other regular contributors questioning specific aesthetic precepts; and letters to the editor that continued debate about such concerns from one issue to the next’ 1 Ashley Dukes, E.H. Visiak, and S.G. Hobson. Letters to A.R. Orage. File 22. bc MS 20c Orage. Alfred R. Orage Archive. Special Collections, University of Leeds, Leeds. 3 July 2015. <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Leeds Arts Club and the New Age: Art and Ideas in a Time of War by Tom Steele Thank You Very Much Nigel, That's a Very Generous Introduction
    TRANSCRIPT Into the Vortex: The Leeds Arts Club and the New Age: Art and Ideas in a Time of War by Tom Steele Thank you very much Nigel, that's a very generous introduction. Thank you for inviting me back to the Leeds Art Gallery where I spent so many happy hours. As Nigel said, the book was actually published in 1990, but it was a process of about 5 or 6 year work, in fact it's turned into a PHD. I've not done a lot of other work on it since, I have to say some very very good work has been done on Tom Perry and other peoples in the meantime, and it's grievously in danger of being the new edition, which I might or might not get around to, but maybe somebody else will. Anyway, what I'm going to do is to read a text. I'm not very good at talking extensively, and it should take about 40 minutes, 45 minutes. This should leave us some time for a discussion afterwards, I hope. Right, I wish I'd thought about the title and raw text before I offered the loan up to the gallery, because it makes more sense, and you'll see why as we go along. I want to take the liberty of extending the idea of war to cover the entire decade 1910-1920, one of the most rebellious and innovative periods in the history of British art. By contrast, in cultural terms, we now live in a comparatively quiet period.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Sketches of Key Pupils
    Appendix E Biographical Sketches of Key Pupils John Godolphin Bennett (1897–1974) was a scientist and philosopher who first met Gurdjieff in Istanbul in 1921 when he was working as an interpreter and personal intel- ligence officer in the British Army. In London that year Bennett began attending meet- ings held by Ouspensky on Gurdjieff’s teaching, and in 1922 he met Gurdjieff again. Bennett made brief visits to Gurdjieff’s Institute at Fontainebleau in February and August of 1923. In the 1930s Bennett formed his own group of followers, and rejoined Ouspensky’s group. In 1946 Bennett established an Institute at Coombe Springs, Kingston-on-Thames in Surrey. After a twenty-five year break Bennett renewed his ties with Gurdjieff in Paris in 1948 and 1949, at which time Gurdjieff taught him his new Movements. In 1949 Gurdjieff named Bennett his ‘official representative’ in England, with reference to the publication of Tales. After Gurdjieff’s death Bennett became an independent teacher, drawing from Sufi, Indian, Turkish, and Subud traditions. In 1953 he travelled through the Middle East hoping to locate the sources of Gurdjieff’s teach- ing among Sufi masters. By the end of his life he had written around thirty-five books related to Gurdjieff’s teaching.1 Maurice Nicoll (1884–1953) studied science at the University of Cambridge before travelling through Vienna, Berlin, and Zurich, eventually to become an eminent psy- chiatrist and colleague of Carl Gustav Jung. Nicoll was a member of the Psychosynthesis group, which met regularly under A.R. Orage, and this connection led Nicoll to Ouspensky in London in 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Age Under Orage
    THE NEW AGE UNDER ORAGE CHAPTERS IN ENGLISH CULTURAL HISTORY by WALLACE MARTIN MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY PRESS BARNES & NOBLE, INC., NEW YORK Frontispiece A. R. ORAGE © 1967 Wallace Martin All rights reserved MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY PRESS 316-324 Oxford Road, Manchester 13, England U.S.A. BARNES & NOBLE, INC. 105 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10003 Printed in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner Ltd, Frome and London This digital edition has been produced by the Modernist Journals Project with the permission of Wallace T. Martin, granted on 28 July 1999. Users may download and reproduce any of these pages, provided that proper credit is given the author and the Project. FOR MY PARENTS CONTENTS PART ONE. ORIGINS Page I. Introduction: The New Age and its Contemporaries 1 II. The Purchase of The New Age 17 III. Orage’s Editorial Methods 32 PART TWO. ‘THE NEW AGE’, 1908-1910: LITERARY REALISM AND THE SOCIAL REVOLUTION IV. The ‘New Drama’ 61 V. The Realistic Novel 81 VI. The Rejection of Realism 108 PART THREE. 1911-1914: NEW DIRECTIONS VII. Contributors and Contents 120 VIII. The Cultural Awakening 128 IX. The Origins of Imagism 145 X. Other Movements 182 PART FOUR. 1915-1918: THE SEARCH FOR VALUES XI. Guild Socialism 193 XII. A Conservative Philosophy 212 XIII. Orage’s Literary Criticism 235 PART FIVE. 1919-1922: SOCIAL CREDIT AND MYSTICISM XIV. The Economic Crisis 266 XV. Orage’s Religious Quest 284 Appendix: Contributors to The New Age 295 Index 297 vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS A. R. Orage Frontispiece 1 * Tom Titt: Mr G. Bernard Shaw 25 2 * Tom Titt: Mr G.
    [Show full text]
  • Ann Ardis Chaper 5 from "Modernism and Cultural Conflict"
    MODERNISM AND CULTURAL CONFLICT 1880-1922 ANN L. ARDIS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Published BY The PRESS Syndicate of The University OF Cambridge The Pitt Building Trumpington Street Cambridge C B 2 I RP United Kingdom Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building Cambridge C B2 2RU UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, AY 1001 1 -42 I I, USA 477 Willamstown Road, Port Melbourne VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon 13 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront Cape Town 8oo1, South Africa http: //wmw.cambridge.org © Ann L. Ardis 2002 This book is in copyright Subject to statutory exception arid to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Baskerville Monotype I 1 /12.5 pt System LATEX 2E [ TB A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Ardis Ann L. 1957 Modernism arid cultural conflict 1880 1922 / Ann I,. Ardis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN o 52 I 81206 2 I. English literature 20th century History and criticism. 2. Modernism (Literature) Great Britain. 3. Culture conflict Great Britain. 4. Culture conflict in literature. I. Title PK478.MG A74 2002 820.9’1 12 dc2 I 2002067060 ISBN o 52 I 81206 2 hardback CHAPTER 5 “Life is not composed of watertight compartments”: the New Age ’s critique of modernist literary specialization BLAST GRAMMAR, BLESS CLICHE, BLAST SPELLING, BLESS BIG PRINT, BLAST REASON, BLESS BLOOD, BLAST SENSE, SO BLESS SELF, SO BLAST THE NEW AGE.
    [Show full text]
  • THE A. R. ORAGE and HOLBROOK JACKSON the OUTLOOK
    THENEW AGE, June 27, 1907, THE Page 137. SOCIALIST IMPERIAL- ISM. AN INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST REVIEW BY OF POLITICS, LITERATURE, AND ART FRANK FORBREAKFAST& AFTER DINNER Edited by In making, use less quantity. it HOLMES. being so much stronger than A. R. ORAGE and HOLBROOK JACKSON ordinary COFFEE. No. 668 [New Series. Vol. I. No. g.] THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 1907. c___I_-_--- --- -IL__ i THE OUTLOOK. overwhelming majority, and, though the Lords may amend, they are not likely to reject it. The most Thanks to the Tsar! unfortunate feature of the third reading debate was the intervention of Mr. Arthur Henderson on behalf of the The representatives of the civilised world, duly as- Labour Party. It is most regrettable that the repre- sembled at the Hague, adopted unanimously a resolu- sentative of that party could make no more valuable tion that the following message should be telegraphed contribution to the debate than a feeble echo of Radical to the Emperor of Russia:- negations. Mr. Henderson said, quite truly, that it was “ the poor who felt most heavily the tremendous in- At the commencement of its labours, the second crease in our military expenditure,” but instead of draw- Peace Conference lays at the feet of your Majesty its ing the obvious moral that our public burdens ought to respectful homage, and expresses to your Majesty its be more equitably adjusted, he appeared to plead merely profound gratitude for having taken the initiative in for a reduction of expenditure, though he must know continuing the work begun in 1899. The Conference (or at least if he does not, many of his colleagues do) begs your Majesty to believe in its sincere desire to that there are more than £600,000,000 of unearned work with all its strength to accomplish the delicate rent and interest going yearly to support the idle rich, and at the same time arduous task which has been all of which ought to be available for public purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of the Work During Gurdjieff’S Lifetime
    DISSEMINATION OF THE WORK DURING GURDJIEFF’S LIFETIME Throughout the course of his teaching Gurdjieff employed deputies or “helper- instructors” to assist with disseminating his ideas. During the Russian phase of the teaching, P.D. Ouspensky and other senior students would often give introductory lectures to newcomers as preparation for Gurdjieff’s presentation of more advanced material. A.R. Orage was responsible for introducing Work ideas to Gurdjieff’s New York groups in the 1920s. Under Gurdjieff’s direction Jeanne de Salzmann organized and led French groups during the 1930s and was largely responsible for teaching Gurdjieff’s sacred dances. Gurdjieff realized that if his teaching was to take root in the West he needed to train and teach students with a Western background who could assist him in making the teach- ing culturally appropriate. Gurdjieff’s efforts to train his assistants may also have come from a desire to develop them into independent teachers in their own right. During a period of physical incapacity following his serious automobile accident in July 1924, Gurdjieff’s Institute at the Prieuré in Fontainebleau virtually ground to a halt. It was then that Gurdjieff realized that none of his students possessed the degree of inner development or the leadership capacity to carry his work forward in his absence: He had to acknowledge what for him was a devastating realization: that the Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man had failed insofar as not a single pupil, nor even all of his students collectively, possessed the inner resources required even temporarily to sustain the momentum of life he had set into motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002
    Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002 bron Van Gogh Museum Journal 2002. Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam 2002 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_van012200201_01/colofon.php © 2012 dbnl / Rijksmuseum Vincent Van Gogh 7 Director's foreword In 2003 the Van Gogh Museum will have been in existence for 30 years. Our museum is thus still a relative newcomer on the international scene. Nonetheless, in this fairly short period, the Van Gogh Museum has established itself as one of the liveliest institutions of its kind, with a growing reputation for its collections, exhibitions and research programmes. The past year has been marked by particular success: the Van Gogh and Gauguin exhibition attracted record numbers of visitors to its Amsterdam venue. And in this Journal we publish our latest acquisitions, including Manet's The jetty at Boulogne-sur-mer, the first important work by this artist to enter any Dutch public collection. By a happy coincidence, our 30th anniversary coincides with the 150th of the birth of Vincent van Gogh. As we approach this milestone it seemed to us a good moment to reflect on the current state of Van Gogh studies. For this issue of the Journal we asked a number of experts to look back on the most significant developments in Van Gogh research since the last major anniversary in 1990, the centenary of the artist's death. Our authors were asked to filter a mass of published material in differing areas, from exhibition publications to writings about fakes and forgeries. To complement this, we also invited a number of specialists to write a short piece on one picture from our collection, an exercise that is intended to evoke the variety and resourcefulness of current writing on Van Gogh.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed 400 399 Author Title Institution Report No Pub Date Available from Pub Type Edrs Price Descriptors Abstract Document Resume C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 400 399 CE 072 717 AUTHOR Marriott, Stuart, Ed.; Hake, Barry J., Ed. TITLE Cultural and Intercultural Experiences in European Adult Education. Essays on Popular and Higher Education since 1890. Leeds Studies in Continuing Education. Cross-Cultural Studies in the Education of Adults, Number 3. INSTITUTION Leeds Univ. (England). Dept. of Adult and Continuing Education. REPORT NO ISBN-0-900960-67-1; ISSN-0965-0342 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 322p.; For a related document in the Cross-Cultural Studies series, see CE 072 716. AVAILABLE FROMLeeds Studies in Continuing Education/Museum of the History of Education, Rm. 14, Parkinson Court, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Adult Education; Andragogy; Case Studies; Continuing Education; Cross Cultural Studies; *Cultural Context; Cultural Differences; *Cultural Exchange; Educational Change; Educational History; Educational. Objectives; Educational Policy; *Educational Practices; *Educational Trends; Extension Education; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; *Role of Education IDENTIFIERS *Europe; Folk High Schools; Popular Education ABSTRACT This book contains the following papers from a European research seminar examining the history and theory of cross-cultural communication in adult education: "Introduction" (Stuart Marriott, Barry J. Hake); "Formative Periods in the History of Adult Education: The Role of Social and Cultural Movements in Cross-Cultural Communication" (Barry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, Orage
    Black Sheep Philosophers by Gorham Munson On October 29, 1949, at the American Hospital in Paris died a Caucasian Greek named Georgy Ivanovitch Gurdjieff. A few nights later at Cooper Union, New York, a medal was presented to the revolutionary architect Frank Lloyd Wright. After his part in the ceremony was over, Wright asked the chairman's permission to make are announcement. "The greatest man in the world," he said, "has recently died. His name was Gurdjieff." Few, if any, in Wright's audience had ever heard the name before, which is quite understandable: Gurdjieff avoided reporters and managed most of the time to keep out of the media publicity. However, there was one kind of publicity that he always got in Europe and America, and that was the kind made by the wagging human tongue: gossip. In 1921 he showed up in Constantinople. "His coming to Constantinople," says the British scientist, J.G. Bennett, "was heralded by the usual gossip of the bazaars. Gurdjieff was said to be a great traveler and a linguist who knew all the Oriental languages, reputed by the Moslems to be a convert to Islam, and by the Christians to be a member of some obscure Nestorian sect." In those days Bennett, who is now an expert on coal utilization, was in charge of a British Intelligence section working in Constantinople. He met Gurdjieff and found him neither Moslem nor Christian. Bennett reported that "his linguistic attainments stopped short near the Caspian Sea, so that we could converse only with difficulty in a mixture of Azerbaidjan Tartar and Osmanli Turkish.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo
    University of Tulsa College of Law TU Law Digital Commons Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works 1995 Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/fac_pub Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 32 James Joyce Q. 533-81 (1995). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unpublished Letters of Ezra Pound to James, Nora, and Stanislaus Joyce Robert Spoo University of Tulsa According to my computation, 198 letters between Ezra so come Pound and James Joyce have far to light. Excluding or letters to by family members (as when Joyce had Nora write for him during his iUnesses), I count 103 letters by Joyce to Pound, 26 of which have been pubUshed, and 95 letters by Pound to Joyce, 75 of which have been published. These numbers should give some idea of the service that Forrest Read performed nearly thirty years ago in collecting and pubUshing the letters of Pound to Joyce,1 and make vividly clear also how poorly represented in print Joyce's side of the correspondence is. Given the present policy of the Estate of James Joyce, we cannot expect to see this imbalance rectified any time soon, but Iwould remind readers that the bulk of Joyce's un pubUshed letters to Pound may be examined at Yale University's Beinecke Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity and Political Identification in the Work
    8 Jagodzinski Herbert Read 9 With this very same conviction, authors who have wri~en o!, Aesthetic Issues in the journals second section go about decentenng this CREATIVITY AND POLITICAL IDENTIFICATION "object" of institutional discourse by showing us that there is a wide range of aesthetics to be seen/ scene at the margins. Cherokee Culture, Native IN TIIE WORK OF HERBERT READ American Artifacts, and the 'neighborhood' view of art are examined. These political locations constitute periphery, marginalized spaces which mainstream art education seldom entertains in its stockjoumals. Rafferty's study of Vancouver graffiti artists is a paradigmatic case study of those dis­ DAVID THISTLEWOOD enfranchised artists outside the art world who legitimate themselves as artists in their revolt against arts institutionalization. In a postmodern world, the irony remains that there is no political space outside/ inside the The idea of a class conflict, in which a powerful minority subjugates art institution. These graffiti artists have become legitimated through their the majority among other ways by depriving it of any sense of self-~te~m very documentation. Schellin adds yet another important dimension to the deriving from worthwhile, origmal work - that is, by suppressmg Its artist as Outsider. He questions the representation of AIDS victims in his creativity - was something Herbert Read acquired through his youthful own poetic way, thereby heightening our consciousness as to the neglect involvement in the late stages of the Arts and Crafts Movement. It was a this sOcio-historical issue has for art educators. Historically there has premise he was never seriously to question, as was the corresponding idea always existed an iconography of disease - how the Other's Body as that to assert one's right to be creative was to engage in a political act.
    [Show full text]
  • Luigi Pericle
    LUIGI PERICLE Il volume celebra Luigi Pericle, pittore, ma anche The volume celebrates Luigi Pericle, painter, thinker, pensatore, letterato, studioso di teosofia writer, scholar of theosophy and esoteric doctrines. e di dottrine esoteriche, rivelando la sua storia It reveals his extraordinary history, made of profound straordinaria, fatta di ricerche profonde e grandi explorations and outstanding encounters. incontri. Dal noto collezionista Peter G. Staechelin From the acclaimed collector Peter G. Staechelin a Sir Herbert Read, trustee della Tate Gallery; to Sir Herbert Read, trustee of the Tate Gallery; dal museologo Hans Hess, curatore della York Art from museologist Hans Hess, curator of the York Art Gallery, al celebre artista e regista tedesco Gallery, to famous German artist and filmmaker Hans Richter. Tutti furono attratti dal suo carisma, Hans Richter. They were all attracted by his charisma, dalla sua personalità versatile, dalla sua arte his multifaceted personality, his ‘clairvoyant’ art. “chiaroveggente”. Con Luigi Pericle, la storia With Luigi Pericle, the history of Art Informel dell’arte informale del secondo Dopoguerra si in the years following World War II opens up apre inaspettatamente alla filosofia, alla spiritualità unexpectedly to philosophy, alternative spirituality, alternativa, ai misteri del cosmo, sullo sfondo the mysteries of the cosmos against the background dell’era spaziale. of the space age. LUIGI PERICLE BEYOND THE VISIBLE BEYOND THE VISIBLE € 39,00 www.silvanaeditoriale.it LUIGI PERICLE LUIGI PERICLE BEYOND THE VISIBLE a cura di/edited by CHIARA GATTI con la collaborazione di/with the collaboration of Luca Bochicchio, Marco Pasi, Michele Tavola Partner principali/ Main partners LUIGI PERICLE Dr. iur.
    [Show full text]